S3} Boy | 220 No.J-17060/44/2019-DDU-GKY Government of India Ministry of Rural Development Department of Rural Development (Rural Skills Division) Notification NoS2.8./2020 NDCC It Building, 7" Floor Jai Singh Road, New Delhi- 110001 Dated?! March 2020 Subject: Changes in SOP regarding Project Closure and Default Management Procedures Ministry of Rural Development has amended certain provisions relating to the rent procedures in the SOP of the DDI Project Closure Provisions:- projects and relating to default mana; are as below: pletion and Closure of KY. The changes made % Pescription ofthe JReference of [Changes made Kection of the SOP the Section IT [issue Project Completion SECTIONS.6 [nr this case. the procedure for [nancial eport audit of the project closure will bd followed as per the procedure define [The project has been} completed i.e, the PLA ha fe ie - a ed pkich SO as shoei tae chain [plone by the Se, Fad, Sal acetone ad and placement no, and Placemen nace Success Rate should be computed as pe 1 the SOP. fhe situanion and procedure describe in SI3.8 [When a PIA requesis fox SECTION 33) a. Foreclosure of the Project project closure. When a PIA has initiated the project jand realizes that they are unable tc execute the project and achieve desired} utcomes for the same and requests t lose the project, and such a request is made by the PIA within one year fro the sanction date of the project, the State could consider this with the ipproval of the competent authority iter following due process of portunity of hearing as per SoP! ‘oreclosure in such cases can happen ith or without imposing, penalty on th IPIA. In cases where the PIA request foreclosure after the completion of one]ear from the sanction date, it shall b lone after imposition of penalty afte following due process of opportunity o hearing as per SoP. In this case, the procedure for financial audit of the project closure will followed as per the procedure definet Jr the section 8.11.2 of the SOP, |Further, trained and placement no. an [Placement Success Rate should 4 computed as per the situation an racedure described in SI3.8 b. Termination of the Project: The State may decide to terminate Jproject under conditions of default afte lziving an opportunity of hearing. The Prescribed competent authority: should kerminate the project after imposin; penalty on the PIA. lin this case, the procedure for financial wudit of the project closure will be followed as per the procedure define lin the section 8.11.2 of the SOP. lFurther, trained and placement no. an [Placement Success Rate should computed as per the situation and} procedure described in SB.8 &. Nonclosure of project ever fier the completion of approved project period: lif a PIA does not apply for closure of the project, even after the completion of me year from the project end date (i.e! y Ath year in case the project duration] is 3 years), such project shall be closet luly following the default procedures. In this. case also, the procedure fo financial audit of the project closure will be followed as per the procedur lefined in the section 8.11.2 of the SOP]‘wrther, trained and placement no, an Placement Success Rate should b computed as per the situation and vrocedure described in SI3.8 Fore e Majeure: In the event of natural and unavoidable] atastrophes which interrupt tha) xpected course of events and restrict the PIA from fulfilling its obligations, the prescribed competent authority o' the State shall take action on case to ase basis and no general guidelines ear} lbe issued in this regard, Further| frained and placement no. an [Placement Success Rate should be computed as per the situation an wrocedure described in SI3.8 SF 3.78: Project ClosureSF 3.7 B (Pg4Collated from Sanction order, MOU, ‘Completion Report 1 of SOP 1) {BG and DDU-GKY Guidelines. lhad been stated(source document mentioned in th that MoRD willtable itself) issue th ama heeklisticomputation sheet been) cparally rrepared and enclosed as Annexure 1 [First 2 ballets undeiNotes to “Tuble'These may be read as Foll jotes to “Table 1} indicative unit Traininglraining Zost...2304 hours)" (Pgl...2304 Sof DDU-GKVlhoursy” (ng 35(/i) There shall be no escalation in rates fouidelines July 2016 of _DDU-GKY/pf sanctioned projects fepietines duly iii) The revised rates as notified by th 16 i) Rates as per the Common Cost Norms (CNN). IMoRD on the basis of Common Cost jorms notified by the MSDE from time} 10 time shall be applicable fo rospective new projects Following section on Standard Instructions has been inserted after '3.7B at Page#5 of SOP 813.8: Deter ining “Trained” 1d “Placed” Number of CandidatesIn case of orderly closure of a project, there could be 3 situations: + Situation-1: PIA has received 1* instalment only + Situation-2: PIA has received 1* and 2" instalment only * Situation-3: PIA has received'1*, 2", and 3" Instalment AA detailed approacl to deal with each of these situations has been described in the following sections: 1 may he noted that while deriving trained and placed numbers as per the following processes, the basic principle of rounding off shall be applied. However, while computing the Sample Success rate (%h), the percentage shall neither be rounded up nor rounded down, instead the same shall be retained up to two decimal points, 1. Situation-1: PIA has received 1" instalment only. In this situation, there could be 2 scenarios: + PIA has completed sanetioned Training Targets * PIA has failed in achieving the sanctioned Training Targets In both the above scenarios, steps to be followed for determining the Placement Success Rate, are explained by examples in the following sections 1.1 Scenario-1: When PIA has Achieved Sanctioned Training Target In this scenario, let us assume different cases as shown in the Table-1, where the original sanctioned target is same as the actual no, of trained candidates: Tablet [Case# [Farget Sanctioned |T'rained Placed (Assumed) assumed as claimed {#s which have passed the y PIA) [Desk & Salary verifications) a) Ry Qa) @) T 2000 2000 20 z 800 7800 2800 3 6500 6500 3500 4 7500 7500 3100 Step-1: Revise Project Size Determine number of candidates ought to have been trained to enable PIA to get 100% fund for the “Placed” number of candidates. This is explained below: As per SOP, it is entailed that PIA can claim 100% of the sanctioned project cost if the placement Sanctioned Training achievement is >=70% of the Project size. For example, if the Project size (ic. target) is 1,000 candidates, PLA will get fund for all (000 candidates if Placement achievement is >=700candidates (i.e. 70% of 1,000 (sanctioned target)]. Therefore, if PIA has trained 100% of the sanctioned target and the placement achievement is <70% of the trained candidates, then the no, of trained candidates to be considered for fund release will be calculated as: [(1 00 x N)/70] number of candidates. Using this formula, the number of candidates to be considered as trained by the PIA in above examples are caleulated {in Col. (5)] as shown in the below table: Table -2 Case# [Target [rained Placed jumber of candidates ough [Sanctioned {Claimed by _|(#s which have passed the\to be Trained by PIA or the assumed) [PIA -assumed)] Desk & Salary Jew Project Size (Rounded) verifications) 100 X Col. (4/70 ay Q) GB) a 6) 7 2000 2000 20 @ 2 800 4800 2800 000 3 6500 6500 3500 5000 4 7500 7500 3100 7286 it may be noted here that the vatue in Col, (5) in the above table in each case will be taken as Project ‘Targets for further verification/computation purposes for project closure. Further, Determination of Number of Placed candidates for Generation of Samples for all installments and Sample Size for Physical Verification shall be calculated as per the Tables 4A and SA (Notification 42/2016) oF 4B and SB (Notification 19/2019), as the ease may be 1.2 Scenario-2: When PIA has NOT Achieved the Sanctioned Target In this scenario, let us assume a few cases as shown in the Table-2 where the number of trained candidates is less than the sanctioned targets: Table3 ‘Target Sanctioned Tratned Placed ‘Case (Assumed) (claimed by PIA- | (#s which have passed the assumed) Desk & Salary verification) a @) @) 4) 7 200 iv a 2 4800 4000 R00 3 6500 3500 3500 4 9500 7500 5000 Step-1: Revise Project Size Determine number of candidates ought fo have been trained to enable PIA to get 100% fund for the “Placed” number of candidates, This is explained below: 5As per SOP, we know that & PIA gets 100% of its funds if Placement achieved is >=70% of the Project size. That means, if Project size (Le. Training target) is say 1000, PIA will get fund for all 1000 ‘candidates if Placement achievement is>=70%. Therefore, if'a PIA has placed N number of candidates, then to get fund for all the trained candidates, they will have to train at least {(100 x N70} number of candidates, Using this formula, the number of candidates to be trained by PIA in our above examples are calculated (in Col. (5)) as shown in the below table Table Case# [Target [Trained Placed [Number of candidates ought prresaeet (Claimed by _ |(#s which havelto be Trained by PIA or the assumed) [PIA assumed)} passed the _ Jew Project Size (Rounded) Desk & Salary [100 X Col. (4)}/70 verifications) a ) ) @ @ 7 2000 100 0 ct) 2 4800 4000 2800 4000 3 6500 3500 3500 3000 4 9500 7400 3000 73 Ut may he noted here that the value in Col. (5) in the above table in each case will be taken as Project Targets for further verification/computation purposes for project closure, 1.2.1 Step-2: Determine Number of Placed candidates for Generation of Samples for all instalments (2"/3"/4") Since PIA has achieved 70 % of placement w.r.. new project size in all the cases, Placement verification is to be done for all 3 installments. This is explained in the below tables (4A & 4B) for each of the cases. Table-4A (Based on Notification 42/2016) [Case# [New Project | Placed _ No. of Placed Candidates from which] ‘Target |(#s which havelSamples will be Generated (Assuming| (as calculated | passed the | Internal Target selected by PLA is in Col. of | Desk & Salary 0%. Table-4) | verifications) [2 EY 4th & Final (7% of (40.25%) (22.75% of Col. Col2) | of Col. 2) 2) a 2) G) 4) (3) (6) T 2 20 z 12 6 2 000 2800 280 | 1610 910 3 5000 3500 350) 2013 137 4 7143 3000 300 | 2875 1625Table-4B (Based on Notification 19/2019) [Case# | New Project Placed Target |(#s which have. (as calculated in |passed the Des Col. Sof Table-4)| & Salary No. of Placed Candidates trom which Samples will be Generated (Assuming Internal Target selected| by PIA is 70%, verification) [3°] _ 3% | 4th & Final 7% off (18 % of | (45 % of Col. 2) CoL2)| Col. 2) @ a @ oO; ® iG) 7 @ 20 2 5 3 z 000 2800 | 280 | 720 T800 3 3000 3500 350 | 900 7250 a Tas 3000-300 | 1286 3214 1.2.2 Step-3: Determine the Samples size for Physi (Now Project Target) and numb Verification based on total target candidates that have passed the Desk Verifies Based on the New Project size as considered in Col in the Table-4A & 4B, determine the samples size for Physical verification for computing Sample Success Rate (P) as per the table given at “SF 7.2C Estimate of sample size” of SOP. This is shown in Table SA and 5B below Table-SA (Based on Notification 42/2016) [Case# [New Project | Placed No. of Samples to be Verified for fFarget (as | (#s which have Instalment: alculated in| passed the Desk | gar 37 a Fina ol. Sof & Salary [Table-4) verifications) a Q) @) a) (3) (6) H co) 20 a 12 e 2 7000 2800 |75 (out of] 75 (out of| 75 (out oF 10) 280) | 1610) 3 3000 3500 100 (out | 100 (out [100 (out oF 1137) of 350) | of 2013) a 7143 3000 125 (out | 125 (out [125 (out of 1625) of 500) | of 2875) + Since the Total population is less than the minimum sample size prescribed in SOP, the number of candidates Placed uself is taken as Sample SizeTable-SB (Based on Notification 19/2019) [Case# JNew Project Placed No. of Samples to be Verified farget(as | (4s which have {calculated in |passed the Desk| = ¥ 4” & Final Col. 5 of & Salary [Table-4) verification) oO Q @ @ @ Oo T 2 20 a * 3 z 4000 2800 [75 (out of 280)] 75 (out of | 75 (out of 720) 1800) 3 3000 3500 TOO (out oF [700 (out oF| 100 (out oF 350) 900) 2250) 4 Tas 3000 125 (out oF [125 (out of| 125 (out oF 500) 1286) 3214) Since the Total population is less than the minimum sample size prescribed in SOP, the number of candidates Placed itself is taken ax Sample Size 1.2.3 Step-4: Carry out Placement Verification on samples drawn as per table SA & SB to determine the Sample Success Rate for Placement and Actual number of Placed candidates for each instalment as shown in the below Tables 6A & 6B below: Table-6A (Based on Notification 42/2016) [Case] New finstaiment-Wise and No] Sample ‘Compute | Number of Project | of candidate tobe | Sizeas | Samples [Sample Success] Candidates, Target Verified for each per Passed | Rate (P) (After) declared as (as Instalment [rabte-5a| Verification | applying the | “Placed” for sleulted instalment] Hof succesfully | Proven of feach instalment in col Sin : s = Table 4) Bsaercagy Kenmnied) Cold x Col.7 Verified for Placement a) @) GB) @) () (6) @) (8) 2 2 2 2 100% 2 1 29 at 2 12 10 83% 10 a” 6 6 5 83% 5 5 | 4000 oe 280 5 7 95% 266 3 1610 715 68 91% 1465910 75 65 87% 792 350 00 98 98% 343 a] sm 38 2013 100 38 88% v7 ro 1137 100 91 91% 1035 Fag 500 125 122, 98% 490, 4] 73 3 2875 125 118 94% 2703 a” 1625 125 122 98% 1593 Table-6B (Based on Notification 19/2019) [Casc#] New |Instalment-Wise and No. of] Sample | No.of [Compute | Number of Project candidate to be Verified for| Sizeas | Samples [Sample Candidates Target each Instalment per Passed Success Rate | declared as eee nstalmentiff of Candidates Table-SB veers sea Peer ‘be in col Sin are assumed), [erOvisions of [Instalment = Table 4) sop) Ico x Col OTe & @ o © @ ®& a 2 2 2 100% 2 1 29 3 5 5 4 80% 4 a” 3 B n 85% n a 280 75 7 95% 266 aoe a 720 75 68 91% 655 a 1800 75 65 87% 1566 e 350 100 98 98% 343 qj) se a8 900 100 88 88% 792 a” 2250 100 91 91% 2048 a 500 128, 122 98% 490 a] mas 3 1286 125 us 94% 1209 a” 3214 125 2 98% 31501.244 Step-S: Based on the Sample Success Rate computed in Table-6A & 6B (Col.7), compute Placement Success Rate of the project afier considering the Internal Target (which we have assumed as 70%) as shown in Table-7A & 7B below: ‘Table-7A (Based on Notification 42/2016) Case# [New project] Instalment -Wise and No. of | Sample | Placement Target | candidate to be Verified for | Success | Success Rate \(as calculated] each Instalment Rate (P) [(SR) = (P) x (I incol 5 in) Tnstatment? |# of Candidates = 10%) Table 4) to be Verified for Placement a) @) 3) 4) @) (6) a 2 100% 0% 1 29 x 12 83% dere a 6 83%. 58% aM 280 95% i 2 ps 30 1610 91% is a” 910 87% 61% 2 350 98% om 3 Aum 3 2013 88% me a” 137 91% by oy 500 98% eR 4 7143 ae 2875 94% bi a 1625 98% 69% Table-7B (Based on Notification 19/2019) Case# [New project] _Instalment -Wise and No, of ] Sample | Placement Target _ |candidate to be Verified for each] Success | Success Rate (as calculated] Instalment Rate (P) (SR) = (P) x (I incol5 it | Tastalment! | of Candidates to = 70%) Table 4) be Verified for Placement oO @ @ @ @ G) 3 Z 100% | 79% 1 29 x 2 80% 56% 6 85% 60% 102 280 95% | gre 2 ‘00f 2 1610 91% | Gag o 910 am | gig o 350 98% | 6am aii) ae 3” 2013 80% | 4% * 1137 91% | gaye = 500 96% | 60x 4] mas 3 2875 94% | Gey ° 1625 98% | gong ‘5 Step-6: Based on the “Placement Success Rate” number for each case us shown Table 74 & 7B, compute the net number of trained candidates for each instalment as shown below in Table-8A & 8B: Table-8A (Based on Not fication 42/2016) Caseii| New Project] Instalment-Wise and No.] Number of | Number of Candidates Target of candidate to be Candidates [that will be considered as (@scalculated! Verified for each Qualified as “Trained ‘col S in Instalment “Placed” for each (Col.5x100)70 Table’) [instalment] fof Tnstalment Candidates | Col x Col.6 of tobe Table-7A Verified for Placement Oo a o) @ & © a 2 2 3 1 29 38 12 10 4 a” 6 5 7 e 280 266 380 2 ‘ap 3 1610 1465 2093 a 910 792 131 : 5000 a 350 343 490 38 2013 mi 2530 ctan 1137 1035 1479 2 500 490 700 4 7143 3" 2875 2703 3861 a" 1625 1393 2276 ‘able-8B (Based on Notification 19/2019) Caset|New Project] Instalment-Wise and No. of [Number of Candidates] ~ Number oF Target | candidate to be Verified for | Qualified as “Placed” | Candidates that (as calcutated| each Instalment for each Instalment = | will be considered incol s in Tastalment? | # of Candidates | Colt x Col. of Table- as “Trained” = Table 4) to be Verified 7B (Colsx100)/70 for Placement Oo @ ) @ @ oO a 2 2 3 1 29 ey 2 4 6 4 6 in 16 2 280 266 380 2 a a 1610 655 936 a 10 1566 2237 aN 350 343 490 3, [/ 8 = 2013 792 M31 a” 1137 2048 2926 e) 500 490 700. 4 7143 3 2875 1209 1727 oD 1625 3150 4500 1.2.6 Step-7: Based on the Placement Success Rate computed at step 5, Table 7A & 7B, Instalment amount computation could be done as per the procedure detailed in the SOP. 2, Situation-2: PIA has received 1" and 2" Instalment only In this situation, there could again be 2 scenarios: 1. PIA has completed sanctioned Training Targets 2. PIA has failed in achieving the sanctioned Training Targets 2Im both the above scenarios, steps 10 be followed for determin explained by examples in the following, Placement Success Rate, are 2.1 Scenario-1: When PIA has Achieved Sanctioned Trai ing Target In this scenario, let us assume the cases as shown in the below Table sanctioned target is same as the actual no. of trained candidates: 1A. & 9B where the original ‘Table-9A (Based on Noti ication 42/2016) Case | Target | Trained [ 2" Instalment Paid for | Inaddition to 2™ Sanctioned] (Claimed by Numbers instalment numbers, (assumed)| PIA - Placed assumed) (7% of Col, 2) (assumed) oO @ i) @ ) © T 2000 2000 200 140 400 z 4800 3800 80 336 650 3 6500 6500 650 5 700 4 7500 7500 750 325 800 ‘Table-9B (Based on Notification 19/2019) Case# |” Target ‘Trained —[2"" Instalment Paid for] In addition to 2™ /Sanctioned|(Claimed by PIA| Numbers Tnstalment (assumed) | assumed) |“Trained | Placed] numbers, (20% of Col.| (7% of additional Number| 2) Col.2) | of “Placed” candidates (assumed) ay @ @ a & Oo T 2000 2000 400 140 700 2 | 4800 4800 960 336 650 3 | 6500 6500 1300 455 700 a | 7500 7500 1500 325 800 3BAAs detailed in Situation-1 Scenario-2, Step-|, Revise Project Size as shown in the below Table-1OA & HOB: Table-10A (Based on Notification 42/2016) (Case#}Target rained 2" Instalment Paid] In addition to 2™ Number of Sanctioned {Claimed for Numbers Instalment numbers, | candidates assumed) by PIA- [Trained | Placed onal n ought to be Pssumed) | (10% of | (7% of | “Placed” e: trained by PIA Col.2) | Col. 2) | (assumed having passed | or the new the Desk verification) | Project (Rounded) [100 X Col. (6)] 70 w Q) QB) @) (5) (6) a) [2000 | 3000 |~ 200 | 140 400 371 2 | 4800 | a800_|— 480 | 336 650 929 3] 6500 [6500 | 650 ass 700 1000 4] 7300 | 7300 [750 | 325 300 11a3 Table-108 (Based on Notification 19/2019) ase# [Target [Trained B™ Instalment Paid] In addition to | Number of ‘anctioned(Claimed |_for Numbers _| 2 Instalment |eandidates ought assumed) by PIA- [Trained | Placed | numbers, | to be trained by pssumed) | (20% of | (7% of | additional | PLA or the new Col.2) | Col.2)| number of | Project Size “Placed” (Rounded) candidates | [100 X Col. (6)] (assumed 170 having passed the Desk verification) (i) (2) G) 44) (3) (6) @) H 2000 “| “2000 [400 [140 400 il 2 4800 | ~ 4800 | 960 | 336 650 929 3 6500 [6500 | 1300) 455 700 1000 q 7500 [7500 | 1300] 25 800 Tas Using Training Targets as listed in Col. 7 of the Table-I0A & 108, follow all the steps as detailed in Situation-1, Scenario-2 for all the cases to determine the Sample Success Rate and also the Placement Success Rate u2.2 Seer In this scenario, let us assume the eases as shown in the Table-I1A & 11 larget is more than the actual no, of trained candidates: Table-11A (Based on Noti ion 42/2016) nario-2: When PIA has NOT Achieved Sanctioned Training Target 'B where the original sanctioned [Case [Target Sanctioned Trained 2""Instalment Paid for In addition to. 2" ‘Assumed) (assumed as Numbers Instalment numbers, claimed by PIA) | “Trained | Placed (10% of Col. (7% of Col. | “Placed” candidates 2 2) (assumed having assed the Desk verification) @ @ @ a @ © T 2000 1200 200 140 400 z 800 3000 80 336 650 3 6500 3000 650 55 700 a 7500 6500 750 325 800 Table-11B (Based on Notification 19/2019) Case# | Target Sanctioned ‘Trained 2" Tnstalment Paid for | In addition to2™ (Assumed) (assumed as Numbers Instalment numbers, claimed by PIA) |" Trained | Placed — jadditional number of (20% of Col.| (7% of Col, | “Placed” candidates 2) 2) (assumed having passed the Desk verification) o @ @ @ @ 3) 7 2000 1200 400 140 400 2 800 3000 960 336 650 3 6500 3000 1500 455 700 a 7500 6500 1500 325 800 15As detuiled in Situation-2 Scenario-1, Step-2, Revise Project as shown in the below Table-I2A & 128: Table-12A (Based on Notification 42/2016) Case# | Target Trained | 2" Instalment Paid [Tn addition to 2") Number of Sanetioned | (assumed as | for Numbers Instalment candidates ought to (Assumed) | claimed by | Trained | Placed | numbers, | be trained by PIA PIA) | (10% of | (7% of | additional | or the new Project Col.2) | Col2) | numberof | Size (Rounded) “Placed” | [100 X Col,(6)] 70 candidates (assumed having| passed the Desk verification) oO ) @) @ @ 6 a 2000 7200 200 140 400 371 2 4800 3000 480) 336 650 29 | 3 6500 5000 650 455 700 1000 4 7500 6500 750 325 800 Tas Pable-12B (Based on Notification 19/2019) Case# | Target Trained instalment Paid |In addition to2"] Number of Sanctioned | (assumed as |__for Numbers Instalment —Jeandidates ought to (Assumed) | claimed by Placed | numbers, | be trained by PIA PIA) (7% of | additional | or the new Project Col.2) | numberof | Size (Rounded) “Placed” | [100 X Col(6)] /70 candidates (assumed having] passed the Desk verification) a) @) B) (4) G) (6) a T 2000 1200 400 140 400 37 2 4800 3000 960 336 650 19 3 6500 5000 B00] 455 700 TO000 4 7500 6500 1500 [525 800 Tas Using Training Targets as listed in Col. 7 of the Table- Situation-1, Seenario-2 tor Placement Success Rates corresponding fo the Notification applicable, 16 12A & 12B, follow all the steps as detailed in all the cases to determine the Sample Success Rates and subsequently3. Situation-3: PIA has received 1", 2™ and 3" Instalmes {In this situation again, there could be 2 scenarios: 1, PIA has completed sanctioned Training Targets 2. PIA has failed in achieving the sanctioned Training Targets |n both the above scenarios, steps to be followed for determining the Placement Success Rate, are explained by examples in the following sections 341 Scenario-1: When PIA has Achieved Sanctioned Training Target 1m this scenario, let us assume the cases where the original sanctioned target is same as the actual no, of trained candidates as shown in the Table-I3A & [3B Table-13A (Based on Notification 42/2016) Case# | Target Trained] 2" Instalment Paid [3 Instalment Paid for [In addition to 2" Sanctioned |(Claimed by| for Numbers Numbers and 3"! (Assumed) PIA) ‘Trained | Placed | Trained | Placed Tnstalment 10% of | (7% of | (57.5% of [(40.25% off numbers, Col2) | Cob2) | Col.2) | Col2) | additional Number of “Placed” candidates (assumed all cleared Desk Verification) oO @ @ @ oO © 7) ® T 2000 2000 200 140 1130 805 400 2 800 800 480 336 2760 1932 650 3 500 6500 60 | 435 3738 2617 700 4 7500 7500 750 325 ws 3019 800 Table-13B (Based on Notification 19/2019) ‘Case# | Target Trained | 2" Instalment Paid [3" Instalment Paid for [In addition to2™) Sanctioned |(Claimed by| for Numbers Numbers and 3" (Assumed) PIA) ‘Trained | Placed | Trained | Placed Instalment (20% of | (7% of | (40% of | (18% of Col.2) | Col2) | CoL2) | Col.2) Number of “Placed” candidates (assumed all cleared Desk Verification) 7a @ @) (ay () (6) a) (8) T 2000 2000 00 140 800 360 400) 2 4800 4800 960 336 1920 364 650 3 6500 6500 100 [435 2600 1170 700 4 7500 7500 1500 [525 3000 7350 800 As detailed in Situation Scenario-2, Step-1, Res Project Size For both the Notifications- 42/2016 and 19/2020. is computed as shown in the below Table-14 Tablo-14 Caseft | Target Sanctioned [Trained] Tn addition to 2" and 3" ] Number of candidates (Assumed) (essumedas | Instalment numbers, fought to be trained by PLA| [rlaimed by PIA} additional umber of | or the New Project size “Placed” candidates (Rounded) (assumed all cleared Desk] [100 X ColL(4)] 70 Verification) o 2 a co) So T 2000 2000 400 TT 2 800 800 50 009 3 6500 500 700 To00 q 7500 7500 800 1143 Using Training Targets as listed in Col. 5 of the above table, follow all the steps as detailed in Situation-1, the Placement Success Rate and subsequent Placement § nario-2 for all the cases to determine Rate. 32 Seenario-2: When PIA has NOT Achieved Sanctioned Training Target 4m this scenario, let us assume the cases as shown in the Table-15A & 15B, where the original sanctioned target is more than the actual no, of trained candidates: ‘Table-15A (Based on Notification 42/2016) Case# | Target Trained [ 2" Instalment Paid [3 Instalment Paid for Sanctioned |(Claimed by| _ for Numbers [In addition to 2" Numbers and 3" (Assumed) | PIA- Placed | Trained | Placed | Instalment assumed) | (10% of | (70% of | (57.5% of {(40.25% of Col. 2) Col.2) | Col.2) “Placed” candidates (assumed- all cleared Desk 18aas shown in the below Table-6 Verification) 0) e @ @ @ © a ® T 2000 1850 200 10 1150 805 400 2 800 4000 180 336 2760 1932 650 3 6500 3200 650 455 3738 2617 700 + 7500 6000 750 | 525 a3 3019 800 ‘Table-15B (Based on Notification 19/2019) Case# | Target | Trained | 2™ Instalment Paid [3™ Instalment Paid for in addition to 2™ Sanctioned |(Claimed by| for Numbers Numbers and 3” (Assumed) | PIA- “| Trained | Placed | Trained | Placed | Instalment assumed) | (20% of | (7% of | (40% of | (18% of | numbers, Col2) | Col2) | Col2) additional umber of “Placed” candidates (assumed- all cleared Desk Verification) aw Q @) ay () (6) q) (8) 7 2000 1850 400 140 800 360 00 2 800 4000 960 336 1920 864 650 3 6500 3200 1300 | 455 2600 1170 700 a 7500 6000 1300] 525 3000 1350 800 AAs detailed in Situation-1 Scenario-2. Step-|, Revise Project Size for both the Notifications be computed Table-16 Case# Target ‘Trained In addition to 2 and 3" | Number of candidates Sanetioned | (Claimed by | Instalment numbers, — jought to be trained by PIA| (Assumed) PIA -assumed)} additional number of | or the New Project size “Placed” candidates (Rounded) (assumed — all cleared Desk| [100 X Col, (4)] /70 Verification) a Q) GB) @) G) 7 2000 7850 400 a z F800 4000 650 729 3 6500 3200 700 1000 4 7500 6000 300 1143 19Using Training Targets as listed in Col. 5 of the above table, follow all the steps as detailed in Situation-1, Scenario-2 for all the cases to determine the Placement Suecess Rate and subsequent Instalment amounts. Default Management Provisions # [Modifications [Existing provisions Reference [Major Penalty: In case of violation oF normsisevere Action for Default™ fiefautt in performance’ fraud will be imposed by _[Seetion 1.6 of SOP I and following the duly laid down default management 1133/2016 Jprocess as per the SOP’s of DDU-GKY li |Whenever a project is terminated, the PIA should be _ [Section 1.6 of SOP I lacklisted and debarred for a period of at least 3 years [Table 1-3 Classification |However, ifthe same PIA completes other projects of [of Penalties to be IDDU-GKY successfully in the same State, after limposed . Pe 11 lebarment, the duly prescribed competent authority Inay decide to waive off the debarment. 2 [Allrecoveries to be made against Bank Guarantee BG) and from dues payable to the PIAS in any other IDDU-GKY projects within the State. In ease recoveries can’t be effected by either of the above, the same shall bbe recovered as per section 3.11 of the Standard iperating procedures. [During the implementation of the programme: If it has been observed by the State, at any stage during the project period, that the PIA is not adhering to the Jevemts ", Section 1.5 ime lines of the project, penalty as per the norms in thel(Remedy of Delay) of ISOP, should be imposed, however, the total penalty [SOP I_and Notification should not exceed 10% of the project cost. ff [iFthe total penalty Tevied on a project (major +minor) [Notification 33/2016. jis more than or equal to 10% of the total cost, in such [Pg 15, “Table 10- -ases, the agency should be terminated and blacklisted. [Details of minor and Imajor penalties ” Point 6 read with Note below the lable. Section 1.4 Table 1-2 ‘timeline for Major [The Ministry shall maintain a list of PIAS, blacklisted vy States on its designated portal and the same shall be wailable for public viewing II appraisal agencies should review this list and make f: note in their appraisal recommendation, [The Ministry reserves the right to Blacklist a PIA rationally based on the recommendation of the State, [Table 10-1 ; details of These blacklistings will be made following the defautt |minor and major Jprocedures as defined in the SOP. 20[Any PLA which has been blacklisted shall not be ligible for submitting proposal for DDU-GKY project. penalties (SF 10.1 A: ew of default jandling procedures) Pg. 13 of notification 33/2016 f penalties to be imposed (SOP 1, Section| [I.6 Action for default) pe 10-11 [Minor Penalty: In case of deviation from SoP as fiefined in chapter 10 of SoP. These will be imposed by following the duly laid down default management roves as per the SOP’s of DDU-GKY IF the commencement ofthe batches, as mandated, has cen delayed by the agency and the State Government is satisfied that it has been delayed due to the non- hincerity of the agency, a penalty should be imposed. This would be at the rate of 0.15% (ofthe pimount leased) er day for the numberof days the -ommencement of the batches has been delayed. [3/2016 _ Table 10-1 (pg| of notification) iF the PIA fails to pay the Penalty and also does not take any other action on it, the project may be lerminated after following due process of opportunity hearing as per SoP and the said penalty along with ther recoveries as per the existing provisions of SoP should be recovered from the Bank Guarantee and the lance amount, ifany, may be recovered using the lauses laid down in Section 3.11 of the SOP. jofification 502017, [point 2 Section 3.11 of the SOP-1 tecovery of dues from a} a P [Extension for the project may be given by the proses sd Competent Authority only twice in the pproject life cycle subject to a maximum period of up to i year. Any extension given for the project shall be a no-cost extension. At the time of extension of the wroject, the PIA should give a revised Action Plan. lotification 2/2016 (pg 10 fobtaining Bank Guarantee (BG) for the extended luration plus 2 months shall be a precondition for -xtension of project duration This issues with approval of the competent authority. Encl:As above. a1 mul rma) rector ( Skills)To Director General, NIRDPR, Hyderabad Additional Chief Secretary/Principal Secretary/ Secretary of the Nodal Department implementing DDU GKY in the States! UT MD, NABCONS, New Delhi Copy to: oveene CEOs/ MDs of the Nodal Departments in States/ UTs implementing DDU GKY PPS to Secretary (RD) PPS to Additional Secretary (RD) PPS to Joint Secretary (Skill) Al officials in DOU GKY ICT- PMU team for uploading the notification on DDU GKY Website d I sctor ( Skills) 22™ a rina &Pnsomer Troe se pr Santon Oar ete oa sece eco fee. fewa toh [Physical Progress of Project261413 [vatican frees during Clone othe re agin yy Aen [cee marmiteBe 5 [Deviations Observed fsnatcace nen lms ent mente 7. [Financial Progress of Project som7 [Ferenc caneiestn soca ana bowrcng Hen uly pl and tle toca UIawat Repo? 7 [Resarang Pet Pacem Suppo Gr he eT[Information Specific to Final Installment & Project Closure ‘9 [Deviations in Financial Progress 40 [Sub-Category wise Achievement Be[Proposal for Release or Recovery -Oviiy Goswe 2) from PIA janconsr wn aaOL‘Computation before CNN. SI. No. Particulars Eligible amount ‘Actual/Admissible Unutilised Amount (Rs.) Total No. of Candidates considered for Project based on [Placement Success Rate (Before CNN ) No. [Eligible amount computed as below fa) Total No. of candidates trained before CNN (As per revised 1 |epplication/sanction order) * Per candidate cost before ICNN/Revision Deductions: lUndisbursed To&Fro (Includng dropouts as per SF 6.3C)- (Budget as per working sheet- Actual/Admissible as per UCs) Unutlised Boarding & Lodging (includ (Budget as per working sheet- Act dropouts SF 6.30) imissible as per UCs) fa) X- Category b) Y-Category [c) Z- Category [Undisbursed PPS (Budget as per working sheat- as per UCS) [b) within state [c) Outside the state [Unuiilised one ime travel cost (Budget as per working sheet- \dmissible as per UCs) - caping budget, if budgeted in pre CNN applicable or Re\ HTabiet Computer cost (Budget as per working sheet JActual/Admissible as per UCs) [Total amount to be releasedirecovered Note: 1. If Actual/ admissible amount is more than the eligible amount restricted to Eligible amount 33Computation after Revision / CNN si Particular Hous/No. of ei lansidates Days 7 [Tas Ro Canadien canner tor Projet based oh Placement Success Rata (Afr rvisor/GNN [rade +1 ade rade [Eligible amount computed as por project cost 24