NAME: HERMIE LYN TIBON INSTRUCTOR: LIEZEL CHAN

TASK: TASK 3 SUBJECT: ED201

1.

Treatment
Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4 Trial 5
1 (1 ml) 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.4
2 (2 ml) 0.4 0.8 0.6 0.2 0
3 (4 ml) 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4
4 (6 ml) 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.8
5 (8 ml) 0.6 0.8 1 0.6 0.6
SOLUTION:
Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication

SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance

1 (1 ml) 5 2.2 0.44 0.028
2 (2 ml) 5 2 0.4 0.1
3 (4 ml) 5 3 0.6 0.02
4 (6 ml) 5 3.2 0.64 0.028
5 (8 ml) 5 3.6 0.72 0.032

Trial 1 5 3.2 0.64 0.028

Trial 2 5 3 0.6 0.06
Trial 3 5 3 0.6 0.06
Trial 4 5 2.6 0.52 0.032
Trial 5 5 2.2 0.44 0.088

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 0.368 4 0.092 2.090909 0.129605 3.006917
Columns 0.128 4 0.032 0.727273 0.586205 3.006917
Error 0.704 16 0.044

Total 1.2 24
2. Three barangays where Voltage, and Power and Energy were collected. The data are shown below
Test the significant difference among three barangays at 0.05 levelof significance.

VOLTAGE
NANYO 7.02 3.7 3.02 3.63 3.12 3.12
DATU
6.09 6.53 6.69 6.13 6.24 6.3
ABDUL
TAGPORE 4.31 4.28 4.42 4.16 3.87 4.36

POWER AND ENERGY

NANYO 33970.42 32360.23 48118.25 34664.13 38777.56 33872.72
DATU
34705.17 42517.74 35424.28 39723.35 49566.25 40632.02
ABDUL
TAGPORE 39781.97496 39697.9478 38369.1462 39324.71088 41913.91988 40121.99184

SOLUTION:

Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication

SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance

NANYO 6 23.61 3.935 2.36623
DATU ABDUL 6 37.98 6.33 0.05524
TAGPORE 6 25.4 4.233333 0.039267

VOLTAGE 3 17.42 5.806667 1.896233

3 14.51 4.836667 2.234633
3 14.13 4.71 3.4303
3 13.92 4.64 1.7353
3 13.23 4.41 2.6523
3 13.78 4.593333 2.568933

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 20.44208 2 10.22104 11.89416 0.002271 4.102821
Columns 3.710361 5 0.742072 0.863545 0.537384 3.325835
Error 8.593322 10 0.859332

Total 32.74576 17
Solution:
S1. Ho: There is no significant relationship among three barangays in terms of voltage at
0.05 level of significance.
Ha: There is a significant relationship among three barangays in terms of voltage at
0.05 level of significance.
S2: ⍺ = 0.05
S3: p-value: 0.537384

S4. Ho is not rejected since 0.537384>0.05 level of significance

Meaning: Ho is True. It means there is no significant relationship among three barangays

in terms of voltage at 0.05 level of significance.. Further we fail to reject the Null
hypothesis.

Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication

SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance

NANYO 6 221763.3 36960.55 34541571
DATU ABDUL 6 242568.8 40428.14 29240156
TAGPORE 6 239209.7 39868.28 1365669

3 108457.6 36152.52 10014663

POWER AND ENERGY 3 114575.9 38191.97 27494723
3 121911.7 40637.23 44142356
3 113712.2 37904.06 7912606
3 130257.7 43419.24 30798457
3 114626.7 38208.91 14166944

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Rows 41584930 2 20792465 0.914057 0.431939 4.102821
Columns 98262410 5 19652482 0.863942 0.53716 3.325835
Error 2.27E+08 10 22747457

Total 3.67E+08 17
Test if the relationship is significant at 0.05 level of significance

Solution:
S1. Ho: There is no significant relationship among three barangays at 0.05 level of
significance.
Ha: There is a significant relationship among three barangays at 0.05 level of
significance.
S2: ⍺ = 0.05
S3: p-value: 0.53716

S4. Ho is not rejected since 0.53716>0.05 level of significance

Meaning: Ho is True. It means there is no significant relationship among three barangays

in terms of Energy and power at 0.05 level of significance.. Further we fail to reject the
Null hypothesis.