UNIT 56

HISTORICAL RELATIONS BETWEEN IRELAND A N D

GREAT BRITAIN. IRISH AUTHORS: SEAN O’CASEY
AND JAMES JOYCE.

1. INTRODUCTION.

2. HISTORICAL RELATIONS BETWEEN IRELAND AND GREAT BRITAIN.

2.1. From ancient times to the sixteenth century.

2.2. From the seventeenth to the late nineteenth century.
2.3. The twentieth century.
2.3.1. Before 1850: the Great Famine.
2.3.2. From 1850 to 1920: the Ulster Crisis.
2.3.3. From 1920 to 1950: Norther Ireland and the IRA.

3. A LITERARY BACKGROUND: THE INTER-WAR PERIOD.

3.1. Main literary forms.

4. IRISH AUTHORS: SEAN O’CASEY AND JAMES JOYCE.

4.1. Sean O’Casey (1884-1964).
4.2. James Joyce (1882-1941).

5. EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING.

6. CONCLUSION.

7. BIBLIOGRAPHY.
1 .
INTRODUCTION.

The present unit, Unit 56, aims to provide an account of the historical relations between Ireland
and Great Britain. Particularly, we shall concentrate on the late Victorian period since both
authors were born in the 1880s, and the first half of the twentieth century since it was the period
in which both authors produced their main works. Despite the two Irish authors under study, that
is, Sean O’Casey and James Joyce lived and produced their works within this period, they
worked in different fields. Thus O’Casey is to be framed within drama whereas Joyce is framed
within novel productions. We shall analyse how they reflected the prevailing ideologies of the
day in the literature of the time which, following Speck (1998), is an account of literary activity
in which social, economic, cultural and political allegiances are placed very much to the fore.

This is reflected in the organization of the unit, which is divided into three chapters which
correspond to the main tenets of this unit: (1) a historical account of the relations between
Ireland and Great Britain throughout history; (2) the literary background of the time, that is, the
late Victorian literature, the birth of modern literature, and also the inter-War years; and finally,
an analysis of (3) the two Irish authors, Casey and Joyce.

2. HISTORICAL RELATIONS BETWEEN IRELAND AND GREAT

BRITAIN.

Chapter 2 provides an account of the historical relations between Ireland and Great Britain
throughout the timeline so as to frame, in next chapter, the literary background of Casey and
Joyce within an appropriate context. In doing so, it is convenient to focus on the main events
related to the late Victorian period and the first half of the twentieth century, approximately
from 1880 to 1950. Thus, under Victoria, a Britain transformed by the Industrial Revolution
became the world’s leading imperial power whereas under the following reigns Britain saw the
dismantling of its empire and, therefore, its decadence together with a period of European
conflicts and wars, including the Irish question and the two World Wars.

This period, bewildered by growing wealth and power at the beginning of the century because of
the pace of industrial and social change as well as scientific discovery, saw a growth in literature,
especially in fiction. Yet, after the middle of the reign, confidence began to fade because of a
series of conflicts, wars and colonial problems, and in the last two decades a different
atmosphere was created. As a result, literature developed various specialist forms, such as
aestheticism, professional entertainment, historical novel, and a disenchanted social concern,
which gave way to the revival of drama.

Yet, we shall examine the development of the relations between Ireland and Great Britain since
ancient times up to approximately 1950 as regards the main turning points occurred in the
mentioned periods.
2.1. From ancient times to the sixteenth century.

In prehistoric times, approximately between c.7000 and 6000 BC, Ireland was connected to
Great Britain by means of land bridges which were soon to be swept away by rising seas during
the last Ice Age. Later on, in the Mesolithic period, although the ice cap had disappeared, the two
islands were still connected by the subsoil beneath which was permanently frozen. In the
Neolithic and Bronze ages, between c.7000 BC and c.750 BC, Ireland was sparsely inhabited by
hunter-gatherers who developed farming techniques. Therefore, the population grew and
immigrants arrived from Britain and the European mainland.

These immigrants are known as the Celts, who came from Britain and the European mainland
over the centuries during the Iron Age (c.750 BC-AD 399) and, who, by this time dominated the
northern half of Europe (Spain, the south-west Portugal, and far as Anatolia). Later on, the
Roman expansion encouraged new invaders to go into Britain and on to Ireland and, during the
last centuries of the pre-Christian era there was a steady inflow of people with Celtic cultures
who, with the help of iron weapons and horses, subjugated the island. Yet, Roman conquests in
Gaul and Britain encouraged the migration of the Gaels to Ireland but, as the Roman Empire
began to fall apart, they ravaged western Britain at the same time as Germanic peoples flooded
in from the east.

Yet, during the fourth and fifth century, Ireland was still to be heavily influenced by the Roman
Empire due to the fostering of British Christianity. By the early fifth century, Christianity seems
to have penetrated parts of the south as a result of regular trading contacts with the Roman
Empire and the work of missionaires.

Thus, the only missionary to have left a written record is known as Patrick, who later on became
an emblematic Irish figure. Seized by Irish raiders early in the fifth century, he was taken as a
slave for six years and, in his extreme loneliness, he renewed his faith in Christianity. When he
escaped, he got back to his home in Britain, was trained as a priest and persuaded the British
Church to send him back as Bishop to Ireland. So we may say that by that time Ireland and
Britain were connected by religion.

Later on, from the ninth to the twelfth century, the continuous Viking raids (AD c.800 and
1169), directed from Britain, brought an abrupt halt to major Irish influence overseas and led to
the abandonment of great monasteries. However, the Irish learned much from Vikings with

respect to two main aspects: first, the fact that during this time the country came close to
political unity and, secondly, the foundation of the island’s first towns, three of which (Dublin,
Waterford and Limerick) were cities by the time the Normans arrived.

Under the Norman rule between the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, the Norman invasion of
Ireland (AD 1169–1315) was very different from that of England a century before in three
aspects: first, that Ireland was not overwhelmed in just a few years as Britain was; that the
newcomers conquered the former Viking settlements and seized fertile lowlands; and finally, that
Normans did not conquer all the territory and left the mountainous regions and Ulster west of the
River Bann to the native Irish.

Already in the fourteenth century, the political history of England is characterized by a period of
violence and revolution, the fact that England’s sovereignty is chiefly nominal whereas Ireland is
left to herself, and the development of two different Irish societies as religion is concerned.

In the fifteenth century, Henry Tudor defeated and killed Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth. A
new phase began in Irish history, as from this time English royal power began to recover.
From then on, and unlike his father, Henry VIII was determined to make himself the ruler of all
of Ireland and therefore, named a lord deputy to rule over Ireland who stayed there as a chief
governor. Almost until the end of the sixteenth century the Tudor monarchy vacillated between
conciliation and conquest.

Sir Anthony St Leger persuaded Henry VIII to change his title from Lord of Ireland to King of
Ireland and the Irish parliament gave its approval in 1541. The act was not only translated into
Irish but developed a chain of events by means of which the lords would drop their traditional
Gaelic titles and give up their lands, receiving them back from the king with English titles.
Moreover, Henry’s break with Rome and the confiscation of monastic lands caused less
dislocation than might have been expected. As a result, England became a Protestant kingdom in
the reign of Edward VI, but the Reformation made little headway in Ireland, even in the Pale.

The mid sixteenth century witnessed the beginning of a new period in the history of the British
Isles which was characterized by the emergence and expansion of the great British Empire and
the figure of Elizabeth coming to the throne in 1558. Under her rule, there was no policy
formulated for the government of Ireland, although by the end of the century the complete
conquest of Ireland became a strategic necessity for Elizabeth I during a time when Spain
threatened to use the island as a means of challenging England from the west. The Elizabethan
conquest (1558–1603) brought about the final subjugation of Ulster, which was a heavy burden
on royal resources.

2.2. From the seventeenth to the late nineteenth

century.

In the seventeenth century, with respect to Ireland, the government of James I (1625–1641) was
really interested in the success of the Plantation of Ulster, not only as a way of paying debts
acquired by Elizabeth during her Irish Wars, but also to spread Protestantism and to secure the
province for the Crown. Moreover, events such as the Reformation and fear of Ireland’s
Catholic majority made Charles I be more concerned to assert his royal prerogatives and to
ensure allegiance to the Established church, since most Ireland was Protestant.

Conflicts and rebellions continued in the Ulster Plantation since it proved difficult for the
British government to find enough British to colonise Ireland, and the native Irish outnumbered
the planters everywhere, resentful at their losses and reduction in status. Meanwhile,
Reformation amongst the Catholic Irish was being strengthened by friars sent over from Spain
and Flanders.Actually, Protestants were absolved if they paid fines, but almost all Catholic
landowners disappeared in Ulster, many obtaining smaller estates as compensation. By the
end of the century, the accession of a Catholic king, James II (1685-1689), warned the
population not only through the length and breadth of England but also through the Protestant
settlement in Ireland. The hopes of Catholic gentry, who had lost so much in Cromwell's land
settlement, were raised by the king’s actions, but soon the country was thrown into conflict
again, and for a time the fate of Britain and much of Europe seemed to depend on the situation in
Ulster.

Yet, James II’s policy brought so many problems to the country again, such as the conflict with
Whigs and Tories alike, that the English nobility asked William of Orange for help. Then on 5
November 1688 an imposing Dutch army disembarked at Brixham and James fled to France. In
1689 William and his wife Mary, James’s eldest daughter, were declared joint sovereigns of
England, Scotland and Ireland. Soon after, James entered Dublin and, under the leadership of
Lord Mount, resistance to the forces of King James was organised.

An assault was made on the Jacobite garrison of Carrickfergus, but it was a disaster. Then the
Jacobites swept northwards and overwhelmed the Protestants in 1689. After this failure, all of
eastern Ulster occupied Belfast without meeting resistance there. For a brief moment in history
which coincided with the turn of the century, Ireland became a conflict point of Europe, and the
victories of William of Orange were a severe blow to the ambitions of Louis XIV to dominate
western Europe. So William’s victory ensured a period of peace in Ireland for the ensuing
century, in which the island prospered and the population grew.

The eighteenth century coincided with the emergence of the Industrial Revolution in England
and all over Europe and the expansion of the British empire. With respect to Ireland, in the late
eighteenth century the cotton industry was established there with the help of protective duties,
and for a time there were successful large enterprises in the counties of Cork, Kildare and
Dublin. In the same period the first mills began in Belfast in the 1770s as well as in the final
years of the Napoleonic Wars this city became the centre of the power production of yarn. By
the end of the century the population rose considerably, but generally productivity had
outstripped population growth.

At the beginning of the nineteenth century things became worse since agricultural prices fell
steadily, the Irish countryside destitution increased and, on top of that, the domestic industries in
wool and linen declined in the face of competition from those of England, thus Manchester,
Leeds, Bradford and Belfast. Hence Dublin also failed to industrialise, though it was once the
second largest city in the British Empire, and could not therefore absorb enough of the poor from
the countryside. By then, Belfast had become the fastest-growing urban centre in the United
Kingdom but it too was incapable of taking in enough of the destitute from central and southern
Ulster, then the most densely populated rural area in the British Isles. By the first half of the
century (1845) it was estimated that one half of the population was dependent on the potato for
survival.

2.3. The twentieth

century.

The early twentieth century and the Irish question are to be politically related to the accession of
Victoria’s son, Edward VII (1841-1910) to the crown, and his reign was known as the
Edwardian Age (1901-1910) or the age of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. Edward was the
only British monarch who reigned for nine years at the beginning of the modern age in the early
years of the 20th century. He was replaced on his death by King George V (1865-1936), who
replaced the German-sounding title with that of Windsor during the First World War. The
Windsor title remained in the family under the figure of Edward VIII, Duke of Windsor (1894-
1972). As we know the family name is still present in the current Royal Family.

2.3.1. Before 1850: the great

famine.

Before 1850, the Industrial Revolution also affected Ireland since in the late eighteenth century,
and for a time there were successful large cotton enterprises, the establishment of the first mills
in the 1770s, and in the final years of the Napoleonic Wars turned Belfast into the centre of the
power production of yarn. Hence, the industrial revolution made spectacular progress in the
eastern Ulster in the nineteenth century due to the capital, business skills and technical expertise
acquired by drapers and cotton manufacturers earlier.

Yet, in social and economic terms, the population in the south rose from about two million at the
beginning of the eighteenth century to over five million by the end of it. However, Dublin, once
the second largest city in the British Empire, failed to industrialise and could not therefore
absorb enough of the poor from the countryside.

On the contrary, Belfast became the fastest-growing urban centre in the United Kingdom but it
was unable of taking in enough population from central and southern Ulster, then the most
densely populated rural area in the British Isles. However, by 1845 a microscopic fungus
affected the potato crops and caused a wave of famine, sweeping most of the island. In addition,
by the end of 1846, the country was hit by snow storms, and thousands of people died of
starvation.

The Tory government acted quickly and, in the hope of making bread cheaper; advanced loans to
grand juries to give employment to the destitute on harbours, roads and bridges and
purchased maize in America to be sold at cost-price in Ireland. Yet, the Whig party did not agree
with this action and a Whig admistration was established instead. Eventually, it is
estimated that about a million people died during the famine and that another million emigrated,
the vast majority to Britain and North America. The government declared in 1848 that the famine
was over, but it continued to rage in 1849 and to a lesser extent until 1852.

2.3.2. From 1850 to 1920: the Ulster

Crisis.

From 1850 to 1920, Irish nationalism spread outwards and downwards and, as a result, the
majority of population demanded some form of self- government. The Protestants, a majority in
the north-east, viewed this development with alarm, and when Westminster agreed to a form of
independence, the Protestants insisted on remaining in the United Kingdom. When the census
revealed the effects of famine in 1851 and most emigrants wanted to leave the country, some
landlords charged money for assisted passages as a rapid way of reducing poor rates and
clearing scrapholders from their estates. As a result, between 1849 and 1854 nearly 50,000
families were permanently dispossessed in the post-Famine clearances.

Soon some concerted action against landlord power began, but amongst Irish substantial tenants.
Hence, James Stephens, a veteran of Young Ireland, found a revolutionary organisation in
Dublin in 1858 which was dedicated to the establishment of an Irish republic by force of arms.

The movement in Ireland, now officially called the Irish Republican Brotherhood but better
known as the Fenians, spread rapidly amongst labourers, shopkeepers and others hard hit by the
successive harvest failures of the early 1860s.

The pressure on the land and living standards rose considerably in the 1850s, 1860s and early
1870s due to the effects of the earlier Great Famine and steady emigration. Rents failed to keep
pace with farm profits and evidence of the new modest prosperity was to be seen in the number
of new Catholic churches erected in these years. In addition, the extermination of the Plains
Indians and the unprecedented production of cheap meat and corn in North America, produced a
crisis on the Irish land. The reduction in prices was fast and disastrous for Irish tenant farmers,
who formed the Land League in the 1879.

Refusing to work for offending landlords, farmers demonstrated their united power in Mayo
against Captain Boycott in 1880. The Prime Minister, W E Gladstone, drafted a Land Act in
1881 which gave tenants new rights and set up courts to control (and generally reduce) rents.
The Land League failed however in its aim to have the landlords removed altogether. Yet, Irish
nationalism increased despite the efforts of the United Kingdom, such as the disestablishment of
the Church of Ireland in 1869, the increasing of rights for tenant farmers by the Home Rule
movement in 1870, or the introduction of the secret ballot in 1872.

This solution divided Ulster politics and as a result, protestants opposed to Home Rule. Then at
the end of 1885, Gladstone announced that he supported Home Rule and that he would bring in

a Bill to establish a parliament in Dublin with limited powers. In a packed Commons, Gladstone
introduced his Bill with an epic speech on 8th April 1886. Desertions from his own side,
however, ensured defeat of the measure in June. Hence in the nineteenth century Belfast was the
most violent corner of Ireland and lots of people were killed.

The very success of first the cotton industry and then of linen manufacture, engineering and
shipbuilding drew in people from the countryside, most of them from mid-Ulster where
sectarian tensions were severe.

Invisible frontiers tween these ghettos were constantly shifting due to the rapid growth of
Belfast, and it was along these frontiers that intense rioting occurred.

By 1888 Belfast was the largest city in Ireland because of its linen industry.

Gladstone made a second attempt to give Ireland Home Rule in 1893. This time the Bill passed
through the Commons but was thrown out of the Lords. There might have been a stronger
reaction in Ireland but for a fatal division in the Irish Parliamentary Party. Liberal Unionists led
by Joseph Chamberlain joined with the Conservatives to create the Unionist Party and during a
long period in office the Unionists made it plain that there would be no devolution for Ireland
but at the same time indicated a desire to eliminate the Home Rule.

The government’s greatest achievement was to take the land issue out of politics. In 1902 the
Irish Chief Secretary, George Wyndham, accepted recommendations from a committee of
landlords, nationalists and unionists that the landlords be bought out. In 1903 Westminster
passed Wyndham’s Land Bill, which encouraged landlords to sell entire estates, the money
being advanced to tenants by the treasury to be repaid. The act was an immediate success,
though it took further legislation in 1909 to compel landlords to sell.

When there was a hint in 1905 that the government would consider a form of Devolution and
Unionists in Ulster formed the Ulster Unionist Council. The Liberals returned to power in 1906
but with such a large majority that they had no need to appease the Nationalists by introducing
Home Rule. Deadlock between the Lords and Commons however forced two elections in 1910,
with the result that the Liberals needed the support of the Irish Parliamentary Party led by John
Redmond to stay in office. In 1911 the Parliament Act ended the Lords’ veto and restricted their
delaying power to three parliamentary sessions. A third Home Rule Bill was introduced in 1912
and in January 1913 the Ulster Volunteer Force was set up, consisting of 100,000 men who had
signed the Covenant. Andrew Bonar Law, leader of the Unionist opposition at Westminster,
pledged his support. When Nationalists formed the Irish Volunteers to support Home Rule in
November 1913, it looked as if Ireland was on the brink of civil war . 1
An umbrella separatist political party was created in 1917. Originally, it was formed in 1905 by
Arthur Griffith, and was called Sinn Fein, which means ‘ourselves’. After a number of
spectacular by-election victories in 1917 and 1918, the party was ready to supplant the Irish
Parliamentary Party. Yet, in the general election of December 1918 the Nationalists were
annihilated, and Sinn Fein was considered then the most representative organisation of the Irish
people in Ireland. The Ulster Unionist Council had already agreed that, instead of resisting Home
Rule for the whole island, they would insist on the exclusion of the six most Protestant counties
in the north-east. Yet, Sinn Fein MPs refused to take their seats at Westminster and instead met in
Dublin, claiming to be the government of Ireland (naming their assembly Dáil Éireann).

The first incident which would led to the War of Independence traces back to the same day as the
Dáil was met in January 1919, when some volunteers attacked unarmed policemen at
Soloheadbeg in county Tipperary. By 1920 the government had suppressed the Dáil and flying
columns of Volunteers, calling themselves the Irish Republican Army, conducted an effective
guerrilla warfare in the countryside. Then, a parliamentary committee, chaired by the former
Ulster Unionist leader Walter Long, prepared a Bill which became law as the Government of
Ireland Act in December 1920. This Act divided Ireland into Southern Ireland with a devolved
parliament in Dublin, and Northern Ireland with a devolved parliament in Belfast.
Both parts of Ireland were to send some members to sit at Westminster. Sinn Fein rejected the
scheme out of hand and continued to support the IRA in its military campaign for a united Irish
republic. Eventually, the Unionists accepted the Act: the six counties of Northern Ireland
comprised the largest area that they could control without fear
that nationalists would gain a majority; and a home rule assembly in Belfast, they believed,
would give them some protection if a future Westminster government sought to reunite the
island.

2.3.3. From 1920 to 1950: Norther Ireland and the

IRA.

In the spring of 1921 and under the Government of Ireland Act, Northern Ireland came into
being. Both Nationalist and Sinn Fein MPs refused to attend but George V’s appeal was heard:
the IRA, now facing the regular British Army operating across country had suffered a number of
serious reverses; and Lloyd George, confronted with many other problems at home and abroad
was eager to make agreement.

The IRA asked for an agreement in July 1921 and, after protracted negotiations at Downing
Street, a treaty was signed with the British government on 6th December 1921. The 26 counties
would become a Dominion called the Irish Free State. Then a special Constabulary was
established between the years 1920 and 1921 to counter the threat of the IRA. The new force was
to be divided into three categories; A Specials, were to be full-time and paid as regular
policemen; B Specials, by far the largest section, to be part-time, uniformed and unpaid; and C
Specials, an unpaid reserve force to be called out only in an extreme emergency. Also, civil
servants were invited to apply but no determined effort was made to get Catholics to apply.

In the local government elections of 1920, the Unionists lost control of Londonderry
Corporation and a majority of councillors pledged themselves to the Irish Republic proclaimed
by Dáil Éireann. Tensions ran high in the city and in May 1920 fierce battles raged in the streets
between the UVF and the IRA. Moreover, in Belfast, after a meeting of 'Protestant and Unionist'
workers on 21 July, Catholics were driven out of the shipyards and in the ensuing weeks out of
many other places of employment in the city. Ferocious conflict followed and outnumbered
Catholics were generally the losers in this intercommunal warfare. In just one week there
seemed to be no prospect of an end to the conflict as the War of Independence edged into Ulster.

Other events followed such as riots, campaigns and conflicts between the police and IRA, who
defended Catholic ghettos in Belfast and Derry; the Civil War between 1922 and 1923; the
economic crisis between 1929 and 1932, caused by the First World War, which had brought
about traumatic changes in world trading conditions: the Northern Ireland’s helpless effort to sell
goods abroad; the Wall Street Crash of October 1929, which affected Belfast since
itdepended on export industries and was hard hit by the contraction of world trade; the reduction
of employees due to the unemployment of insured workforce; an attempt for a Protestant
Parliament where Catholics made up around one third of the inhabitants of Northern Ireland, and
their representatives were certain always to be in opposition.

Also, the 1932 riots, a rare occasion when Protestants and Catholics campaigned together, went
on strike and organised protest marches to demand improved assistance; and the Sectarian
conflict between 1932 and 1935, which brought together in solidarity the working-class of
Catholics and Protestants. In addition, there was a period of inaction between 1939 and 1940,
where cabinet meetings were infrequent and brief, and the average age of ministers was high in
the eve of the war. Finally, the period between 1939 and 1967 can be named as one of war and
peace. The Second World War underlined the experiences of the two parts of Ireland, which were
sharply different, and as a result, the south remained neutral and free from attack, while the north
suffered severely during the 1941 Blitz. Attempts by nationalists to get rid of partition aroused
little sympathy in a world made anxious by the Cold War. Meanwhile welfare reforms greatly
improved the quality of life.

3. A LITERARY BACKGROUND: THE INTER-WAR

PERIOD.

The situation described in the years before the First World War, which saw serious labour
troubles, many of them connected with the growth of Trades Unionism, Home Rule for Ireland,
Free Trade or Protection, Votes for Women, the decline of agriculture and the growing
urbanization of the country were major problems of the day. We must take into account that
after the Boer War (1899-1902) the aloofness which Britain had so long and prosperously
maintained from European conflicts was abandoned in face of growing German strength, and
national rivalries finally came to a head in the appalling struggle of 1914-1918.

Similarly to the literary features of the late Victorian period, the literature of the age (up to
1920) saw a spread of education since “not only was there a larger market than ever before for
the “classics” and for all types of fiction, but there arose an entirely new demand for works in
“educational” fields – science, history and travel. As a profession and as a business, literature
offered better financial prospects (Albert, 1990:433)”.

Also, the spread of literacy was accompanied by an enormous output of books and “the
awakening of the national conscience to the evils resulting from the Industrial Revolution. More
than ever before would- be reformers pinned their faith on the printed word and on the serious
theatre as media for social propaganda (1990:434)”. Hence, the two periods are to be
characterized by the dominance of the novel as a vehicle for the sociological studies which
attracted most of the great artists of the period, and the rebirth of drama, which appeared after
more than a hundred years of insignificance since the time of Shakespeare. Like the novelists,
most of the important dramatists were namely concerned with the contemporary social scene,
and though, toward the end of the period, there are signs of a revival of poetic drama, and prose
continues as the normal medium.

Yet, the period of inter-wars (1918-1939) was, according to Albert (1990:507), “overshadowed
by the two World Wars –the after-effects of the first and the forebodings of the second. After the
Treaty of Versailles (1783) attention in England was still mainly concentrated on foreign affairs-
the growing pains of the new League of Nations, uncertainty in the Middle East, and troubles in
India and Ireland. The Treaties of Locarno (1925) diminished, at least temporarily, anxieties in
Europe, and home affairs began again to dominate English political thought.”

In addition, “the General Strike of 1926 was a major manifestation of the post-War slump,
which culminated in the ‘depression’ and the problems which made the early thirties a period of
great distress, particularly for the industrial areas. Foreign problems again came to the fore with
the rise to power of the Nazis in Germany, and from 1934 until 1939 there was mounting tension
abroad, and at home a gradual return to prosperity as industry was geared to rearmament.
Spiritually the period saw the immediate post-War mood of desperate gaiety and determined
frivolity give way to doubt, uncertainty of aim, and a deeper self- questioning on ethical,
social, and political problems, until the outbreak of hostilities in 1939, followed by the critical
situation after the evacuation of Dunkirk, enabled the nation to achieve a new unanimity of
purpose.”
3.1. Main features of the inter-war
period.

The main features of the inter-war periods are summed up in five key concepts: the breakdown
of established values, the resurgence of poetry, the variety of technical experiments in most
lieterary genres, the influence of radio and cinema, and the speed of life.
A) Poetry.
Broadly speaking, the hopes for a new world quickly disappeared in people’s minds after the
World War I, which caused a general feeling of disillusionment and despair. Writers witnessed
how culture disintegrated with no positive values to replace it and soon they felt the need for a
new world, for a new outlook on life. Following Albert (1990), the overall impression of this
inter-war years coincide with a new awareness of sociological factors which affect poetry, for
instance, developments in poetic technique, the difficulty of modern poetry, the combination of
psychology and politics, the rise of surrealism and new traditionalism, and the quest for
stability. Thus,developments in poetic technique were soon demanded to show a more realistic
way to face up to those difficult years. So, there was a change from old poetic forms to free
verse, and also to sprung rhythms, complex verbal patterns, and disregard for normal syntax.
The emphasis on the evolution of new forms gave way to a great difficulty of modern poetry,
thus the dominance of form on content and the use of eccentric themes. Hence this difficulty
caused an increase in the use of ‘vers libre’ and obscurity to appeal the complex states of mind.
This trend was encouraged by the popularity of the metaphysical conceit, which
accompanied the rebirth of symbolism (Yeats, French Symbolistes) and the imitation of
allusiveness (Eliot). Poetry reflected the situation of those inter-war years: complexity, a
refined sensibility, and the use of allusive and indirect language.The rise of surrealism and new
traditionalism also contributed to poetry writing, for instance, the former as an over-
simplification of a complex and constantly shifting situation which meant the escape from the
complex problems of contemporary life by means of experiments; the latter as the
expression of the individual emotional development and their reactions to their environment.
Poetry was then characterized by a detailed observation and lucid phraseology, concise
expression, ironic style, stirred by love and sex, out of the scope of experiments, and also
on the line of dramatic monologue.
Among the most representative poets of this period, we may mention Gerard Manley Hopkins
(1844-1889), T.S. Eliot (1888-1965), Wystan Hugh Auden (1907- 1973), Stephen Spender
(1909-1977), C. Day Lewis (1904-1972), Louis MacNeice (1907-1963), Dame Edith Sitwell
(1887-1964), and Ezra Pound (1885-1972).
rose: the novel.

B)Drama.
As for poetry, the situation of the inter-War years was deeply felt in the English theatre, and
therefore, in Ireland within the Irish Literary Revival Drama. Following Albert (1990), after the
war the sociological factors which affected this literary form were, broadly speaking, the
conditions in the theatre, the decline of realism, the development of comedy, the popularity of
the history play, the revival of poetic drama and the experiments abroad and at home. Thus,By
the 1920s the conditions in the English theatre was defined as poor since there were no worth
productions since Shaw’s Pygmalion (1913). In addition, the arrival of the cinema constituted a
new threat to the theatre since it quickly became the main way of entertainment of the masses.
The cinema was a powerful competitor as it is today due to the ability to offer sensation,
spectacle on a scale impossible in the theatre, and the novelty of a new art form.The most
outstanding expressionist dramatists were theAmerican Eugene O’Neill and Elmer Rice. In
England the influence of expressionism is to be seen in O’Casey, Priestley, and James
Bridie.

C) Prose.

There is no doubt that the Victorian era was the age of the English novel, namely realistic,
thickly plotted, crowded with characters, and long. By the end of the period, the novel was
considered not only the premier form of entertainment but also a primary means of analyzing
and offering solutions to social and political problems, only challenged by the revival of drama
towards the last two decades. This king style, the novel, is presented with a political,
philosophical or social overtone since was the ideal form to describe contemporary life and to
entertain the middle class.

Yet, the twentieth century witnesses the development of the novel into new revolutionary
techniques as well as the genres of poetry and drama. Thus, we shall examine the novel in
relation to, for instance, the new approach as an interpreter of life, experiments in the evolution
of a new technique, the influence of pshychology, the lack of popularity of the new novelists,
writers in the established tradition, war books, satire, escapist novels, the autobiographical-
novel-sketch comedies, and the growth of the American novel under the figures of the lost
generation. The novel was regarded as an interpreter of life since it reflected the disillusionment,
cynicism, despair, and bewilderment in face of the crumbling of established moral values
which characterize the post-War world. These features, combined with its form and content,
made the inter-War generation look to the novel for an interpretation of the contemporary scene.
According to Albert (1990:521), we may distinguish three main groups of novelists: first, those
who attempted to replace the old values for new ones; second, those who portrayed the
complexities of inter-War life; and finally, those who focused attention on the impact of life
on the individual consciousness and on characters rather than action.This practice is closely
connected to impressionism which gives way to expressionistic techniques based on
experiments, which establish a clear difference between the pre- War novel (Henry James) and
that of the inter-War years (James Joyce). Namely the novel develops from having a controlled,
finished, artistic form to have a more loose, fluid, and less coherent one; from presenting an
outward appearance to inner realities of life; from a simple chronological development of plot to
a complex and discontinuous one. Apart from James Joyce, Virginia Woolf, and aldous
Huxley, other who experimented in this way included Dorothy Miller Richardson and May
Sinclair.
Yet, the most representative technique of this period is drawn from the influence of
pshychology so as to present the mind of the characters: the stream of consciousness, the
use of the interior monologue, the detailed tracing of the association of ideas, and an
allusive style. The rapid development of the science of psychology did much to deepen
and enrich the study of human character in the early years, but its full impact came with
the works of Sigmund Freud about the study of personality. This opened the way to the
exploration of the vast fields of the subconscious and the unconscious so as to dwell the
mind of characters, which meant a breakdown of Victorian moral attitudes.Satire was also
common as a form of fiction. Satirist writers are Rose Macaulay (1881-

1958), Ronald Firbank (1886-1926), and Cyril Connolly (1903-1974).

Another genre was escapist novels, characteristic of all periods of great emotional and
moral tension. This type of novel was highly demanded in the 1920s, which was partly
met by imaginative, fantastic, and light writ ing. Among the most representative writers
 we include Norman Douglas, Walter de la Mare, and David Garnett.

4. IRISH AUTHORS: SEAN O’CASEY AND JAMES

JOYCE.

4.1. Sean O’Casey

(1884-1964).

Following Albert (1990:548- 550), Sean O’Casey “was born in Dublin, and worked as a
labourer, living in the crowded tenements of Dublin’s slums, which he describes so vividly in his
early plays. After his early stage successes he made literature his career, and in 1926
received the Hawthornden Prize. O’Casey’s first play, The Shadow of a Gunman , was produced
at the Abbey Theatre in 1923. Its setting is the slum tenements of Dublin, in their crowded
squalor, and it is an unflinching study of the Anglo-Irish War of 1920, capturing well all the
bloodiness and violence of the struggle and the dangerous intensity of the lives of the
participants, his characters”.

“O’Casey, as later, uses the device of a mouthpiece character, who here gives an ironical
commentary on the events. The chief heroic character is a woman, as in Juno and the Paycock
(1924), an infinitely more mature play, and his masterpiece. Again the setting is the Dublin
slums: the time now the civil disturbances of 1922. It is a vivid and intensely powerful play, in
which rich, almost grotesque humour covers yet emphasizes the underlying bitter tragedy”.

“Three of O’Casey’s finest creations figure here –the deeply pitying Juno, her worthless
husband, the ‘Paycock’, and his boon companion, Joxer Daly. The Plough and the Stars (1926), a
tragic chronicle play dealing with the Easter rising of 1916, is equally realistic in its exposure of
the futility and horror of war. There is the same blend of grotesque humour and deep tragedy,
and once again O’Casey makes use of the mouthpiece character”.

“His next play, The Silver Tassie (1929), was refused by the Abbey Theatre and failed on the
boards, though some have described it as the most powerful tragedy o our day. War is still the
theme, now the 1914-1918 War. O’Casey gives an impassioned and bitter picture of the
footballer hero retuning paralysed from the trenches. It is unflinching in its truthfulness, and the
suffering in the play is intense –perhaps there is too much suffering and too little action. It is of
particular interest because here O’Casey experiments with the mingling of the realistic and
expressionistic types of drama”.

“His introduction of a symbolic technique is seen in the blending of prose and rhythmic chanted
verse, which gives tremendous power to the second act in particular. How far his experiments
have, as has been thought, subdued his great gifts it is difficult to say, but his later plays Within
the Gates (1933), The Star Turns Red (1940), Purple Dust (1940), Red Roses for Me (1946), Oak
Leaves and Lavender (1946), and Cockadoodle Dandy (1949), do not have the intense life of his
best three, though the magic of his language remains”.
 “Juno and the Paycock, The Plough and the Stars, and The Silver Tassie marked O’Casey out as
the greatest figure in the inter-War theatre. His own experience enabled him to study the life of
the Dublin slums with the warm understanding with which Synge studied the life of the Irish
peasantry, and, like Synge, he coud draw magic from the language of the ordinary folk he
portrayed. His dialogue is vivid, racy, and packed with metaphor, and his prose is rhythmical and
imaginative. He had, too, Synge’s gift of mingling comedy with the tragedy that is his main
theme. In O’Casey the mood changes rapidly. Comedy is seldom long absent, yet one can never
forget the grim, underlying sadness. He draws what he sees with a ruthless objectivity and an
impressionistic vividness of detail.”

4.2. James Joyce

(1882-1941).

James Joyce was born in Dublin and was the son of middle - class Irish parents. “He was
educated in Jesuit colleges and at the Royal University. He abandoned the idea of taking
orders, however, and shortly after the turn of the century he left Ireland for France. In Paris he
studied medicine and thought of becoming a professional singer. During the 1914-1918 War he
taught languages in Switzerland [since he was medically unfit for service], and afterward returned
to Paris, where he settled down to a literary life, struggling continually against ill-health and public
opposition to his work”.

Regarding his literary contribution, he used a straightforward narrative technique in his first
work, Dubliners (1914) so as to achieve an objective, short story study of the sordid Dublin
slums. The result was a powerful written prose which, though simple, has a distinct individual
flavour. “Set in the same city is A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (1916), an intense
account of a developing writer torn between the standards of an ascetic, religious upbringing and
his desire for sensuousness. Though the work is largely autobiographical (Stephen Dedalus is
Joyce), the writer preserves a cool detachment in the precise analysis of his hero’s spiritual life.
His handling of the sexual problems involved is particularly forthright.”

“An earlier version, much more conventional in style, was Stephen Hero, which was not
published until 1944. The artistic dilemma of Stephen-Joyce was re-expressed in his
unsuccessful play Exiles (1918). Stephen Dedalus appears again in Ulysses (1922), a study of the
life and mind of Leopold and Mrs Bloom during a single day. It is modelled on the Odyssey of
Homer, but it is set in the squalor of Dublin’s slums. There are parallel characters in the two
works, and the structure is in each case the same; these likenesses are deliberately invoked to
stress the sordid meanness of modern life as contrasted with life in the heroic age”.

“The ‘stream of consciousness’ technique and the internal monologue are used with great
power, and Bloom has been described as the most complete character in fiction. The material is
handled objectively and with a frankness that caused the book to be banned as obscene: the style
shows clearly Joyce’s mastery of language, his ingenuity, brilliance, and power. Published inthe
same year as The Waste Land [1922], it presents a similar view of the hopeless dilemma of man
in the post-War world. It appeared in The Little Review in America, but was banned after the
fifth instalment, and this ban was not lifted in England until 1933.”

“Joyce’s only other novel was Finnegan’s Wake (1939), parts of which had appeared as early as
1927 and 1928 as Work in Progress and Anna Livia Plurabelle. In it he has developed his
technique to a point where subtlety of the history of the human race from its earliest beginnings,
as seen in the incoherent dreams of a certain Mr Earwicker. The use of an inconsecutive
narrative and of a private vocabulary adds to the confusion, but it cannot conceal the poetic
furor, the power, and brilliant verbal skill of the work”.

Among his novels’ features we shall examine his subjects, his technique and his style. First of
all, regarding his subjects, Joyce is regarded as a “serious novelist, whose concern is chiefly with
human relationships –man in relation to himself, to society, and to the whole race. This is true
also of his latest work, though his interest in linguistic experiments makes it difficult to
understand his meaning. Acutely aware of the pettiness and meanness of modern society, and of
the evils which spring from it, he is unsurpassed in his knowledge of the seamy side of life,
which he presents with startling frankness. He is a keen and subtle analyst of man’s inner
consciousness, and, in common with the psycho-analysis of his day, he is much preoccupied
with sex”.

Regarding his technique, Joyce is said to be a pioneer in the quest of a new technique to present
the contemporary human dilemma. “He was a ceaseless experimenter, ever anxious to explore
the potentialities of a method once it was evolved, and in his use of the ‘stream of
consciousness’ technique, and in his handling of the internal monologue, he went further and
deeper than any other. His sensitiveness, his depth of penetration into the human consciousness,
give to his character-study a subtlety unparalleled in his day, and if, in his attempts to catch
delicate and elusive shades of feeling and fix them in words, he has frequently become
incomprehensible, the fact remains that a character like Leopold Bloom is a unique and
fascinating creation”.

Finally, his style has been defined as a change from an early straightforward and simple writing
to a complex, allusive and original one in his last years. In this latter, Joyce uses a broken
narrative, with abrupt transitions, the omission of logical sentence links and a new vocabulary.
This produces a pure writing which is often private in significance, that is, a writing in which
words are coined by the breaking up of one word and the joining of its parts to parts of other
words similarly split, and roots of words from many languages.
In short, he preferred the comic to the tragic view of life, and his humour may be comic,
intellectual and even sardonic in tone.

5 EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS IN LANGUAGE

TEACHING.

Literature, and therefore, literary language is one of the most salient aspects of educational
activity. In classrooms all kinds of literary language (poetry, drama, prose –novel, short story,
minor fiction-, periodicals) either spoken or written, is going on for most of the time. Yet,
handling literary productions in the past makes relevant the analysis of literature in the twentieth
century, and in particular, Irish literature for our purposes. Yet, what do students know about
Irish literature and its main authors? At this point it makes sense to examine the historical
background of Britain and Ireland within the twentieth century so as to provide an appropriate
context for these two Irish authors in our students’ background knowledge and check what they
know about it.

Since literature may be approached in linguistic terms, regarding form and function
(morphology, lexis, structure, form) and also from a cross-curricular perspective (Sociology,
History, English, French, Spanish Language and Literature), Spanish students are expected to
know about the history of Britain and its influence in the world. In addition, one of the
objectives of teaching the English language is to provide good models of almost any kind of
literary productions for future studies.

Currently, action research groups attempt to bring about change in classroom learning and
teaching through a focus on literary production under two premises. First, because they believe
learning is an integral aspect of any form of activity and second, because education at all levels
must be conceived in terms of literature and history. The basis for these assumptions is to be
found in an attempt, through the use of historical events, to develop understanding of students’
shared but diverse social and physical environment.

Learning involves a process of transformation of participation itself which has far reaching
implications on the role of the teacher in the teaching- learning relationship. This means that
literary productions are an analytic tool and that teachers need to identify the potential
contributions and potential limitations of them before we can make good use of the historical
events which frame the literary period. So, literature productions may be easily approached by
means of the subjects of History, Language and Literature by establishing a paralelism with the
Spanish one (age, literature forms, events).

Moreover, nowadays new technologies (the Internet, DVD, videocamera) and the media (TV,
radio, cinema) may provide a new direction to language teaching as they set more appropriate
context for students to experience the target culture. Present-day approaches deal with a
communicative competence model in which first, there is an emphasis on significance over
form, and secondly, motivation and involvement are enhanced by means of new technologies
and the media . Hence literary productions and the history of the period may be approched in
terms of films and drama representations in class, among others, and in this case, by means of
books (novels: historical, terror, descriptive) and drama (opera, comedies, plays), among others.

Actually, O’Casey and Joyce’s influence upon 20th-century literature was wide since most of
their works have been approached in terms of literature, plays or films. For instance, O’Casey’s
three best plays, Juno and the Paycock, The Plough and the Stars, and The Silver Tassie marked
him out as the greatest figure in the inter-War theatre as well as with Joyce, whose fame was
drawn from his three main novels Dubliners (1914), A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man
(1916) and Ulysses (1922), where the former has been recently filmed.

The success partly lies in the way literary works become real to the users.

6 .
CONCLUSION.

Since literature reflects the main concerns of a nation at all levels, it is extremely important for
students to be aware of the close relationship between History and Literature so as to understand
the main plot of a novel, short story, or any other form of literary production (play, comedy,
poem). In this unit, we have partic ularly approached the first half of the twentieth century from
the Irish perspective, and in particular, through the eyes of two of its most outstanding authors,
O’Casey and Joyce.

It is worth pointing out that both authors shared similarities and differences, for instance, they
both were born in the 1880s, were of Irish Dublin backgrounds , studied the life of the Dublin
slums, wrote about Ireland problems (the Anglo-Irish War in 1920, the Easter rising in 1916, the
First World War), and experimented with modernist techniques in their writings (stream of
consciousness, humour in tragedy, rhythmic language –almost musical- , the blending of prose
and verse). Yet, though they lived in the same period, they explored the human mind and social
problems from different perspectives: O’Casey from drama and Joyce from the novel.

So far, we have attempted to provide the reader with a historical background on the vast amount
of literature productions in the twentieth century. This information is relevant for language
learners, E.S.O. and Bachillerato students, who may not automatically establish similiarities
between British, Spanish and worldwide literary works. So, learners need to have these
associations brought to their attention in cross-curricular settings. As we have seen,
understanding how literature developed and is reflected in our world today is important to
students, who are expected to be aware of the richness of English literature, not only in Great
Britain but also in other English-speaking countries.
7. BIBLIOGRAPHY.

Albert, Edward. 1990. A History of English Literature. Walton-on-Thames. Nelson. 5 edition

th

(Revised by J.A. Stone).

Magnusson, M., and Goring, R. (eds.). 1990. Cambridge Biographical Dictionary. New York:
Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, R. 1980. Historia Contemporánea, Akal ed., Madrid.

Sanders, A. 1996. The Short Oxford History of English Literature. Oxford University Press.
Rogers, P. 1987. The Oxford Illustrated History of English Literature. Oxford University Press.

Speck, W.A. 1998. Literature and Society in Eighteenth-Century England: Ideology Politics
and Culture 1680-1820. Book Reviews.
Thoorens, Léon. 1969. Panorama de las literaturas Daimon: Inglaterra y América del Norte.
Gran Bretaña y Estados Unidos de América. Ediciones Daimon.

van Ek, J.A., and J.L.M. Trim, 2001. Vantage. Council of Europe. Cambridge University Press.