Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Japplphysiol 00162 2019
Japplphysiol 00162 2019
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Body
mass, g 39.53 ⫾ 1.81 34.36 ⫾ 1.13* 28.36 ⫾ 1.25*# 29.63 ⫾ 1.14*† 31.18 ⫾ 1.49*† 32.28 ⫾ 1.71*† 31.38 ⫾ 0.76*† 28.92 ⫾ 0.84* 24.57 ⫾ 0.98*#
Soleus, mg 7.5 ⫾ 0.2 7.6 ⫾ 0.2 7.1 ⫾ 0.3† 6.9 ⫾ 0.3† 7.1 ⫾ 0.2† 7.2 ⫾ 0.2† 7.5 ⫾ 0.2† 6.9 ⫾ 0.2† 6.0 ⫾ 0.2*#
Rel Soleus,
mg/g 0.19 ⫾ 0.01 0.22 ⫾ 0.01* 0.25 ⫾ 0.01* 0.24 ⫾ 0.01* 0.23 ⫾ 0.01* 0.23 ⫾ 0.01* 0.24 ⫾ 0.01* 0.24 ⫾ 0.01* 0.25 ⫾ 0.01*
EDL, mg 8.9 ⫾ 0.1 5.9 ⫾ 0.1* 6.3 ⫾ 0.2*#† 5.7 ⫾ 0.2† 5.9 ⫾ 0.1† 6.0 ⫾ 0.2† 5.9 ⫾ 0.1† 5.9 ⫾ 0.2† 4.7 ⫾ 0.1*#
Rel EDL,
mg/g 0.23 ⫾ 0.01 0.17 ⫾ 0.00* 0.22 ⫾ 0.01# 0.19 ⫾ 0.01* 0.19 ⫾ 0.01* 0.19 ⫾ 0.01* 0.20 ⫾ 0.00* 0.21 ⫾ 0.01# 0.20 ⫾ 0.01*
Gast, mg 123.30 ⫾ 2.2 51.30 ⫾ 1.6* 49.43 ⫾ 2.14*† 47.93 ⫾ 1.49*† 46.99 ⫾ 1.36*† 48.26 ⫾ 1.12*† 48.85 ⫾ 1.58*† 46.03 ⫾ 2.03*† 36.29 ⫾ 1.09*#
Rel gast,
mg/g 3.17 ⫾ 0.09 1.50 ⫾ 0.05* 1.74 ⫾ 0.06* 1.63 ⫾ 0.06* 1.52 ⫾ 0.06* 1.52 ⫾ 0.07* 1.56 ⫾ 0.05* 1.60 ⫾ 0.08* 1.49 ⫾ 0.05*
TA, mg 50.00 ⫾ 3.5 28.40 ⫾ 0.9* 28.24 ⫾ 0.73* 25.83 ⫾ 0.75* 26.73 ⫾ 0.86* 27.33 ⫾ 0.82* 28.87 ⫾ 0.74*† 28.03 ⫾ 0.71* 22.01 ⫾ 0.95*#
Rel TA,
mg/g 1.28 ⫾ 0.08 0.83 ⫾ 0.03* 1.00 ⫾ 0.03* 0.88 ⫾ 0.04* 0.87 ⫾ 0.03* 0.85 ⫾ 0.03* 0.92 ⫾ 0.02* 0.97 ⫾ 0.03* 0.91 ⫾ 0.05*
Masses and relative (rel) masses are represented as means ⫾ SE; n ⫽ no. of mice. Body mass was decreased in dystrophic (D2-mdx) compared with healthy
(DBA) mice, and treatment with QNRLis ⫹ prednisolone (QNRLisPred) further decreased body mass. Absolute muscle masses were reduced in dystrophic mice
compared with healthy mice, except the soleus was similar between groups. Treatment with QNRLisPred further decreased absolute muscle masses. Similarly,
relative muscle masses were decreased in dystrophic mice, regardless of tissue or treatment, DBA, n ⫽ 10; D2-mdx, n ⫽ 8; quercetin (Q), n ⫽ 9; nicotinamide
riboside (NR), n ⫽ 8; QNR, n ⫽ 8; lisinopril (Lis), n ⫽ 7; QLis, n ⫽ 10; QNRLis, n ⫽ 8; and QNRLisPred, n ⫽ 9. EDL, extensor digitorum longus; Gast,
gastrocnemius; TA, tibialis anterior. *Significantly different from DBA; #significantly different from D2-mdx; and †significantly different from QNRLisPred,
P ⬍ 0.05.
the trichrome images, which is divided by the total area to identify the distribution, contractile area, and fibrotic area, one-way ANOVAs
percentage of the total area that was fibrotic. were performed using GraphPad Prism with a Newman-Keuls post
Fiber area distribution was assessed using immunohistochemis- hoc test. Data from soleus fatigue experiments were analyzed
try. Sections were incubated with antilaminin (anti-rabbit; cat. no. utilizing a repeated measure model in which a spatial power
RB-082-A; Thermo Scientific) using our standard immunohisto- variance structure was used. EDL contraction-induced injury data
chemistry protocol as previously described (29). Briefly, after were analyzed using a repeated measures model that implemented
being washed [phosphate buffered saline (PBS)] and blocked (5% an autoregressive variance structure. A mixed model method was
goat serum, 5% bovine serum albumin, 1% DMSO in 2⫻ PBS), used to determine significant sources of variation (Proc Mixed,
slides were incubated in primary antibody (laminin, 1:100 in SAS V9.0, SAS Inst., Cary, NC) that included fixed effects for
blocking solution) overnight at 4°C, then washed and incubated in treatment, time, and treatment ⫻ time interaction with pretreat-
secondary antibody (anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 488, 1:500; cat. no. ment value (20 min baseline measurement at 4 mo of age) as a
4412S; Cell Signaling Technology) for 1 h at room temperature. linear covariate. When fixed effects were significant sources of
Slide covers were mounted with SlowFade Gold Antifade Moun- variation, the PDIFF statement of SAS was used at the fixed-effect
tant with DAPI (cat. no. S36938; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and level of least squares means to separate pairwise differences.
sealed with nail polish. Slides were imaged at ⫻10 magnification
on the same inverted microscope. For each sample, two indepen- RESULTS
dent images were taken and quantified (100 – 400 fibers/image).
Fiber areas were objectively measured using OpenLab Software. Animal characteristics. Mouse body mass was decreased by
Statistics. To determine significant sources of variation in single 13–38% in untreated and treated D2-mdx mice compared
time point measures, such as tetanic force, specific force, fiber area with healthy (DBA) mice (P ⬍ 0.05) (Table 1). Additionally,
Fig. 1. Soleus muscle function. A: tetanic force and specific force were decreased in D2-mdx mice, regardless of treatment, compared with DBA. B: resistance
to fatigue was measured over 10 min. C: despite similar fatigue resistance between DBA and D2-mdx at these time points, QNRLis ⫹ prednisolone
(QNRLisPred) increased fatigue resistance at 120, 300, and 600 s compared with D2-mdx. DBA, n ⫽ 10 mice; D2-mdx, n ⫽ 7– 8 mice; quercetin (Q), n ⫽ 8
mice; nicotinamide riboside (NR), n ⫽ 8 mice; QNR, n ⫽ 8 mice; lisinopril (Lis), n ⫽ 7 mice; QLis, n ⫽ 9 –10 mice; QNRLis, n ⫽ 7 mice; and QNRLisPred,
n ⫽ 9 mice. Statistical significance was established at P ⬍ 0.05; *significantly different from DBA; #significantly different from D2-mdx.
less than 5% in DBA to 11–18% in D2-mdx groups (P ⬍ 0.05). Distribution of fiber cross-sectional area was shifted toward
Treatments did not significantly decrease fibrotic area compared an overabundance of smaller fibers and a corresponding un-
with D2-mdx, but treatment with QNRLisPred significantly in- derrepresentation of larger fibers in D2-mdx groups compared
creased fibrotic area compared with QLis (Fig. 4; P ⬍ 0.05). with DBA (Fig. 5A). The mean fiber area was similar between
Fig. 3. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL). A: representative H&E images (⫻40) of soleus muscle and
quantification of contractile area. B: representative H&E images (⫻40) of EDL and quantification of contractile area. Contractile area was significantly decreased
in D2-mdx mice, which was not corrected by these treatments. DBA, n ⫽ 8 –9 mice; D2-mdx, n ⫽ 8 mice; quercetin and lisinopril (QLis), n ⫽ 10 mice; Q,
nicotinamide riboside, and Lis (QNRLis), n ⫽ 7–9 mice; and QNRLis ⫹ prednisolone (QNRLisPred), n ⫽ 8 mice. Statistical significance was established at
P ⬍ 0.05; *significantly different from DBA; #significantly different from D2-mdx; †significantly different from QLis; ‡significantly different from QNRLis.
Fig. 4. Trichrome staining of the soleus. Representative trichrome images (⫻40) of soleus muscle and quantification of fibrotic area. Fibrotic area was increased
in dystrophic muscle. DBA, n ⫽ 9 mice; D2-mdx, n ⫽ 8 mice; quercetin and lisinopril (QLis), n ⫽ 10 mice; Q, nicotinamide riboside, and Lis (QNRLis), n ⫽
8 mice; and QNRLis ⫹ prednisolone (QNRLisPred), n ⫽ 8 mice. Statistical significance was established at P ⬍ 0.05; *significantly different from DBA;
†significantly different from QLis.
DBA, D2-mdx, and QLis but was decreased by 32% in Consistent with our earlier work using long-term quercetin
QNRLis and QNRLisPred compared with DBA (Fig. 5B; P ⬍ treatment of mdx mice, a relatively less-severe rodent model of
0.05). Median fiber cross-sectional area was decreased by DMD (28), application of quercetin over 7 mo to D2-mdx mice
20 – 45% in all D2-mdx groups compared with DBA (Fig. 5B; did not correspond with improved limb muscle function. Pre-
P ⬍ 0.05). Additionally, the variance coefficient was at least viously, we demonstrated that quercetin improved soleus spe-
doubled in all D2-mdx groups compared with DBA and in- cific force but did not potentiate other parameters of muscle
creased 19% in QNRLis compared with D2-mdx (Fig. 5B; P ⬍ function. We then surmised that the transient nature of quer-
0.05). cetin-mediated protection (28) may be due to depleted NAD⫹
and successfully treated with NR (28). Early support for this
DISCUSSION
rationale was established by prior observations that NAD⫹
DMD is caused by a mutation in the dystrophin gene, depletion in mdx mice was corrected after 12 wk of NR
resulting in the absence of functional dystrophin protein and a supplementation (25). This promising outcome was accompa-
complicated sequela. Researchers and clinicians continue to nied by an improved exercise capacity despite elevated ener-
pursue a variety of strategies intended to counter these cellular getic stress due to decreased mitochondrial oxidative phos-
dysfunctions and slow or prevent disease progression. Al- phorylation rate and increased mitochondrial ATP production
though transformative therapies are currently in various phases load (25). Despite dosing differences in this investigation, it is
of Food and Drug Administration approval to treat tomorrow’s likely that the advanced disease progression in the present
patients, pragmatic solutions are urgently needed to treat to- investigation (older mice, more-severe model) and/or the long-
day’s patients. In this study, our purpose was to determine the term use of NR limited its efficacy. Given that 1) the D2-mdx
extent to which treatment of D2-mdx mice with quercetin, model more accurately recapitulates injury in humans than the
nicotinamide riboside (NR), and/or lisinopril (Lis) improved mdx mouse model and 2) long-term treatment should be
muscle function and decreased disease-related muscle damage. expected with DMD patients, the applicability of NR to DMD
Counter to our hypotheses, we failed to demonstrate that seems tenuous based on the current findings.
treatment with quercetin, NR, or lisinopril independently or in In the present investigation, lisinopril did not improve mea-
combination meaningfully improved muscle function or de- sures of muscle function or decrease histological damage.
creased histopathological injury. Only a cocktail containing Similarly, short-term treatment with lisinopril did not improve
Pred (QNRLisPred) provided some protection against fatigue muscle function in an mdx/Utrn⫹/⫺ model, although lisinopril
and contraction-induced injury, but it did not decrease histo- decreased histological injury (21). When used in combination
logical injury. with spironolactone, an aldosterone receptor antagonist, lisin-
Fig. 5. Fiber area distribution of the soleus. A: dystrophic fiber area distribution was shifted toward an abundance of small fibers. B: mean fiber area was similar
between healthy and dystrophic muscle, but median was decreased in all D2-mdx groups. Additionally, the variance coefficient was elevated in dystrophic
muscle, regardless of treatment. C: representative immunohistochemistry images (⫻10) of laminin of soleus muscle. DBA, n ⫽ 8 mice; D2-mdx, n ⫽ 7 mice;
quercetin and lisinopril (QLis), n ⫽ 7 mice; Q, nicotinamide riboside, and Lis (QNRLis), n ⫽ 4 mice; and QNRLis ⫹ prednisolone (QNRLisPred), n ⫽ 5 mice.
Groups were compared within each fiber area bin using a one-way ANOVA. Significance was established at P ⬍ 0.05; *significantly different from DBA;
#significantly different from D2-mdx; †significantly different from QLis.
opril increased EDL and diaphragm function and decreased may contribute to translational limitations of therapeutic find-
histological injury in the quadriceps when treatment was ings to human populations. In this study we used an emerging
started at 4 wk but not at 8 wk in mdx/Utrn⫹/⫺ mice (23). model of DMD, the DBA/2J-mdx (D2-mdx) mouse, which has
Interestingly, in the mdx model, treatment with lisinopril and a relatively severe, progressive pathology and early-onset car-
spironolactone did not improve muscle function or decrease diac dysfunction (10). Consistent with our data from 48-wk-old
histological damage (19). Although differences in animal D2-mdx mice, EDL tetanic force and specific force were
model, duration of study, dose (33 mg/L or 66 mg/L), and use decreased at 7, 28, and 52 wk (10). Moreover, similar to our
of drug in combination likely account for some differences current findings in soleus, increased fibrosis was previously
between these investigations, collectively they provide under- reported in tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, and quadriceps in
whelming support for continued use of lisinopril alone as a 6- and 8-mo-old D2-mdx mice compared with control (15).
skeletal muscle therapy for DMD. Notably, the combination of Interestingly, fat accumulation was significantly increased at 6
lisinopril and metoprolol (-blocker) mitigate some aspects of mo in the gastrocnemius and at 6 and 8 mo in the quadriceps
disease severity in cardiac muscle in a clinical population (32). (15), but in this investigation fatty infiltration was not visually
Within the context of preclinical murine experiments to date, apparent in the 11-mo-old soleus or EDL. Ostensibly, in-
DMD has been most commonly modeled by the C57BL/10- creased fatty infiltration decreased contractile cross-sec-
mdx (mdx) mouse. Although this mouse model has been useful tional area in this prior work (15) and supports functional
for studies related to disease mechanism, its mild phenotype observations in the current investigation. Moreover, as in
23. Rafael-Fortney JA, Chimanji NS, Schill KE, Martin CD, Murray JD, 28. Spaulding HR, Ballmann CG, Quindry JC, Selsby JT. Long-term
Ganguly R, Stangland JE, Tran T, Xu Y, Canan BD, Mays TA, Delfín quercetin dietary enrichment partially protects dystrophic skeletal
DA, Janssen PM, Raman SV. Early treatment with lisinopril and muscle. PLoS One 11: e0168293, 2016. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.
spironolactone preserves cardiac and skeletal muscle in Duchenne mus- 0168293.
cular dystrophy mice. Circulation 124: 582–588, 2011. doi:10.1161/ 29. Spaulding HR, Kelly EM, Quindry JC, Sheffield JB, Hudson MB,
CIRCULATIONAHA.111.031716. Selsby JT. Autophagic dysfunction and autophagosome escape in the mdx
24. Rodrigues M, Echigoya Y, Maruyama R, Lim KRQ, Fukada SI, mus musculus model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Acta Physiol (Oxf)
Yokota T. Impaired regenerative capacity and lower revertant fibre 222: e12944, 2018. doi:10.1111/apha.12944.
expansion in dystrophin-deficient mdx muscles on DBA/2 background. Sci 30. Swaggart KA, Demonbreun AR, Vo AH, Swanson KE, Kim EY,
Rep 6: 38371, 2016. doi:10.1038/srep38371. Fahrenbach JP, Holley-Cuthrell J, Eskin A, Chen Z, Squire K,
25. Ryu D, Zhang H, Ropelle ER, Sorrentino V, Mázala DA, Mouchiroud
Heydemann A, Palmer AA, Nelson SF, McNally EM. Annexin A6
L, Marshall PL, Campbell MD, Ali AS, Knowels GM, Bellemin S, Iyer
modifies muscular dystrophy by mediating sarcolemmal repair. Proc
SR, Wang X, Gariani K, Sauve AA, Cantó C, Conley KE, Walter L,
Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 6004 –6009, 2014. doi:10.1073/pnas.
Lovering RM, Chin ER, Jasmin BJ, Marcinek DJ, Menzies KJ,
Auwerx J. NAD⫹ repletion improves muscle function in muscular dys- 1324242111.
trophy and counters global PARylation. Sci Transl Med 8: 361ra139, 31. Vassilakos G, Lei H, Yang Y, Puglise J, Matheny M, Durzynska J,
2016. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5504. Ozery M, Bennett K, Spradlin R, Bonanno H, Park S, Ahima RS,
26. Selsby JT, Ballmann CG, Spaulding HR, Ross JW, Quindry JC. Oral Barton ER. Deletion of muscle IGF-I transiently impairs growth and
quercetin administration transiently protects respiratory function in dystro- progressively disrupts glucose homeostasis in male mice. FASEB J 33:
phin-deficient mice. J Physiol 594: 6037–6053, 2016. doi:10.1113/JP272057. 181–194, 2019. doi:10.1096/fj.201800459R.
27. Selsby JT, Morine KJ, Pendrak K, Barton ER, Sweeney HL. Rescue of 32. Viollet L, Thrush PT, Flanigan KM, Mendell JR, Allen HD. Effects of
dystrophic skeletal muscle by PGC-1␣ involves a fast to slow fiber type angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or beta blockers on the
shift in the mdx mouse. PLoS One 7: e30063, 2012. doi:10.1371/journal. cardiomyopathy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Cardiol 110:
pone.0030063. 98 –102, 2012. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.064.