Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Cosmic

Investigation
Description
Team Formation:
Participants are divided into teams.
Team members collaborate throughout the
event to brainstorm and speculate on the
scenarios.
They get their names/houses by sorting hat
ceremony.

Scenario Presentation:
The event organisers present a series of
"What If" scenarios. These scenarios can be in
the form of video clips, written questions, or
multimedia presentations.
Each scenario is carefully designed to be
intriguing and cover a wide range of topics,
from outer space science to pop science and
speculative future events.

Scenario Exploration:
Teams are given a specific amount of time (e.g.,
3-5 minutes) to delve into each scenario.
They discuss and analyze the scenario,
considering various aspects, potential
consequences, and scientific principles that
come into play.

Presentation Phase:
After the allotted exploration time, teams
present their findings and speculations on the
scenario they were given.
Presentations can be in the form of brief
talks, creative presentations, or discussions.

Discussion and Feedback:


After each presentation, there's a brief
discussion where other teams and participants
can ask questions, provide feedback, or offer
alternative speculations. (Bonus Marks)

Scenario Rotation:
The process repeats for several scenarios,
allowing teams to explore a diverse range of
speculative situations.

CY2(Talk-a-Discussion):
What Happened to Chandrayaan 2 lander?
Students from Sci-fi explains.

Structure of event
Welcome and Introduction

Team Formation

Scenario Presentation

Scenario Exploration

Presentation Phase

Discussion & Feedback

Scenario Rotation

Cy2

Closing Remarks & Results

Scoring Categories

1. Creativity (15 points):


- Originality and uniqueness of
speculations.
- Creative presentation

2. Scientific Accuracy (25


points):
- Correct application of scientific
principles.
- Logical reasoning and evidence-based
speculations.
- Alignment with established scientific
knowledge.

3. Depth of Analysis (30 points):


- Thorough exploration of the scenario's
implications.
- Consideration of multiple angles and
factors.
- In-depth discussion of potential
consequences.

4. Presentation Skills (10


points):
- Clarity and effectiveness of
communication.
- Engaging and organized presentation.
- Ability to convey complex ideas
clearly.

5. Teamwork (10 points):


- Evidence of effective teamwork within
the group.
- Balanced contributions from team
members.

6. Engagement (Bonus) (10


points):
- Active participation and enthusiasm
during discussions.
- Thoughtful questions and contributions
during other team presentations.

7. Discipline & Disqualification:


Marks would be deduced for creating
indiscipline in the hall and for
unnecessarily arguing with the judges.
Use of internet / mobile during any point in
the activity would lead to
disqualification.

JUDGES DECISION WOULD BE FINAL


AND HOLD THE AUTHORITY TO
DISQUALIFY ANY TEAM FOUND
DISTURBING THE ENVIRONMENT.

You might also like