Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 Screen Film Radiographic Technique
3 Screen Film Radiographic Technique
6
EXPOSURE FACTORS
7
FACTORS THAT MAY INFLUENCE X-RAY QUANTITY AND
QUALITY
8
PRIMARY EXPOSURE FACTORS
EXPOSURE
FACTORS
SECONDARY
FACTORS
• Of these, the most important are kVp and mAs, the factors principally
responsible for x-ray quality and quantity.
11
kVp
12
kVp
• Higher kVp:
– Higher beam quality
– Greater beam penetrability
– More scatter radiation
• Rationale: more Compton effect interaction
– Less differential absorption
– Result: reduced image contrast
13
kVp
• Higher kVp:
– Higher beam quality
– Greater beam penetrability
– More scatter radiation
• Rationale: more Compton effect interaction
– Less differential absorption
– Result: reduced image contrast
14
MILLIAMPERES
15
MILLIAMPERES
• Question:
– What is the electron flow from cathode to anode when the 500-mA
station is selected?
16
TIME (s)
17
• Question:
– A radiographic technique calls for 600 mA at 200 ms. What is the mAs
value?
18
• Question:
– A radiograph of the abdomen requires 300 mA and 500 ms. The patient is unable
to breath-hold, which results in motion blur. Therefore, the exposure is made with
a time of 200 ms. Calculate the new mA that is required.
19
DISTANCE
20
• The following relationship, called the direct square law, is derived from
the inverse square law.
• It allows a radiologic technologist to calculate the required change in
mAs after a change in SID to maintain constant OD.
21
DISTANCE
• Question:
– An examination requires 100 mAs at 180 cm SID. If the distance is
changed to 90 cm SID, what should be the new mAs setting?
22
IMAGING SYSTEM
CHARACTERISTICS
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
24
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
25
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
26
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
27
FILTRATION
INHERENT FILTRATION
COMPENSATING FILTERS
28
FILTRATION
• Inherent filtration
– Glass or metal envelope
– For general-purpose tubes, the value of inherent filtration is
approximately 0.5 mm Al equivalent
• Light-localizing collimator
– Provides an additional 1.0 mm Al equivalent
29
FILTRATION
• Added filtration
– 1-mm Al filter is inserted between the x-ray
tube housing and the collimator
30
COMPENSATING FILTERS
31
HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATION
32
HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATION
• Half-wave rectification
– Results in the same radiation quality as is produced by full-wave
rectification, but the radiation quantity is halved.
– Used in mobile and dental x-ray imaging systems
• Full-wave rectification
– Same as half-wave rectification except there is no dead time.
– X-rays are emitted continually as pulses.
– The required exposure time for full-wave rectification is only half that
for half-wave rectification.
33
HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATION
34
HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATION
• High-frequency generators
– The voltage waveform is nearly constant, with less than 1% ripple.
– High-frequency generation results in even greater x-ray quantity and
quality.
– Used increasingly with dedicated mammography systems, computed
tomography (CT) systems, and mobile x-ray imaging systems.
35
PATIENT FACTORS
PATIENT FACTORS
THICKNESS
PATIENT
FACTORS COMPOSITION
PATHOLOGY
37
HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATION
• Hyposthenic
– Thin but healthy appearing; these patients require less radiographic technique.
• Hypersthenic
– Big in frame and usually overweight.
• Asthenic
– Small, frail, sometimes emaciated, and often elderly
38
HIGH VOLTAGE GENERATION
39
THICKNESS
• The thicker the patient, the more x-radiation is required to penetrate the
patient to expose the image receptor.
• For this reason, calipers are available to the radiologic technologist for use
to measure the thickness of the anatomy being imaged.
40
THICKNESS
• The thicker the patient, the more x-radiation is required to penetrate the
patient to expose the image receptor.
• For this reason, calipers are available to the radiologic technologist for use
to measure the thickness of the anatomy being imaged.
41
COMPOSITION
• The thorax and the abdomen may have the same thickness, but the
radiographic technique used for each will be considerably different.
• The radiologic technologist must estimate the mass density of the
anatomical part and the range of mass densities involved.
• Soft tissue
– Low kVp and high mAs are used.
• Extremity,
– Consists of soft tissue and bone, low kVp is used because the body part is thin.
42
COMPOSITION
• Chest
– Takes advantage of the high subject contrast.
– Lung tissue has very low mass density, the bony structures
have high mass density, and the mediastinal structures have
intermediate mass density.
– high kVp and low mAs can be used to good advantage.
▸ This results in an image with satisfactory contrast and low
patient radiation dose.
43
PATHOLOGY
• The type of pathology, its size, and its composition influence radiographic
technique.
• In this case the patient examination request form and previous images may
be of some help.
• The radiologic technologist should not hesitate to seek more information
from the referring physician, the radiologist, or the patient regarding the
suspected pathology.
44
PATHOLOGY
• Destructive pathology
– Causing the tissue to be more
radiolucent.
• Constructive pathology
– Increasing mass density or composition,
causing the tissue to be more
radiopaque.
45
IMAGE QUALITY FACTORS
IMAGE QUALITY FACTORS
REVIEW
PRODUCE EVALUATE
47
IMAGE QUALITY FACTORS
48
OPTICAL DENSITY/
IR EXPOSURE
OPTICAL DENSITY
50
OPTICAL DENSITY
51
OPTICAL DENSITY
• Overexposure
– Radiograph: too dark or high OD
– Rationale: too much x-rays reaches the image receptor
– Can cause saturation artifact
• Underexposure
– Radiograph: too light or low OD
– Rationale: too little x-rays reaches the image receptor
– Can cause quantum mottle
52
OPTICAL DENSITY
A, Overexposed radiograph of the chest is too black to be diagnostic. B, Likewise, an underexposed chest
radiograph is unacceptable because no detail to the lung fields is apparent. (Courtesy Richard Bayless, University
of Montana.)
53
MILLIAMPERE-SECONDS (mAs)
54
MILLIAMPERE-SECONDS (mAs)
55
FIFTEEN PERENT kVp RULE
56
Normal chest radiograph taken at 100 cm source-to-image receptor distance (SID). B, If the
exposure technique factors are not changed, a similar radiograph at 90 cm SID (A) will be
overexposed, and at 180 cm SID (C) will be underexposed. (Courtesy Kurt Loveland, Southern
Illinois University.)
57
FIFTEEN PERENT kVp RULE
• Question:
– A Radiographer performed Chest PA examination on a 14 year old girl,
with the following factors, 82 kvp, 3 mAs, 72 inches SID. The
radiologist observed that the image is too dark and displays many
shades of colors, and requests to repeat the examination. What are
the new factors to be used by the RT?
58
KILOVOLTAGE
59
KILOVOLTAGE
60
KILOVOLTAGE
• Question:
– A radiograph of the elbow is produced using 4 mAs at 60 kVp. What
kVp would be required to halve the exposure to the IR?
• Answer:
– 60 kVp (60 kVp X 15%)
– 60 kVp (60 kVp X 0.15)
– 60 kVp - (9 kVp) 51 kVp
61
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
62
ANODE HEEL EFFECT
63
ANODE HEEL EFFECT
64
SOURCE TO IMAGE RECEPTOR DISTANCE (SID)
• SID alters the intensity of the beam reaching the IR, according to the
inverse square law.
• The inverse square law affects exposure in inverse proportion to the
square of the distance.
• In radiography the most common situation is a need to maintain an
acceptable IR exposure while changing the distance.
• To maintain IR exposure, mAs (or an influencer) must be changed to
compensate for the exposure change. The exposure maintenance
formula is used.
65
SOURCE TO IMAGE RECEPTOR DISTANCE (SID)
• This formula is based on the inverse square law but is reversed to a direct
square law because mAs must increase when distance increases, and vice
versa, in order to maintain IR exposure.
66
SOURCE TO IMAGE RECEPTOR DISTANCE (SID)
• Question:
– If a satisfactory exposure is obtained with 20 mAs at 72”, what mAs
will be required to maintain the same exposure at 40”?
67
SOURCE TO IMAGE RECEPTOR DISTANCE (SID)
• Question:
– If a satisfactory PA chest radiograph is made at 72” with 4 mAs, what
mAs will be required at 56”?
68
OBJECT TO IMAGE RECETOR DISTANCE (OID)
OID IR Exposure
69
FILTRATION (all types)
70
BEAM RESTRICTION
• Restricting the beam, collimating, or reducing the primary beam field size
reduces the total number of photons available.
• This reduces the amount of scatter radiation and therefore reduces the
overall IR exposure.
Collimation IR Exposure
71
ANATOMICAL PART
• Because the patient is the prime attenuator of the beam, the anatomical
part being examined has a great deal of influence on IR exposure.
• Attenuation is dependent on the thickness and type of the tissue being
imaged.
• Tissue type
– Affected by the average atomic number and the density (quantity of matter per unit
volume) of the tissue.
– The use of contrast media will alter the average atomic number of the tissue and
can affect IR exposure.
– Pathology can alter tissue thickness and/or type.
72
ANATOMICAL PART
Tissue Thickness
Average Atomic Number IR Exposure
Tissue density
73
ANATOMICAL PART
74
ANATOMICAL PART
75
ANATOMICAL PART
76
GRIDS
• Grids absorb scatter, which would otherwise add exposure to the IR and
density to the film.
Grid Ratio
Low frequency Grid IR Exposure
Dense interspace material
Moving Grids
Improperly used grids
77
GRIDS
78
IMAGE RECEPTOR
80
IMAGE RECEPTOR
• Question:
– What is the proper mAs for use with an 80-RS system when technical
factors of 55 kVp and 5 mAs produce an acceptable image with a 200-
RS system?
81
CONTRAST
OPTICAL DENSITY
83
CONTRAST
84
CONTRAST
85
CONTRAST
86
87
KILOVOLTAGE
88
DIFFERENTIAL ATTENUATION
89
DIFFERENTIAL ABSORPTION
Differential
kVp Contrast
Attenuation
90
DIFFERENTIAL ABSORPTION
Differential
kVp Contrast
Attenuation
91
SCATTERED RADIATION
93
SCATTERED RADIATION
94
95
FIVE PERCENT kVp RULE
96
FIVE PERCENT kVp RULE
• Question:
– A modest reduction in image contrast is required for a knee exposed
at 62 kVp/ 12 mAs. What technique should be tried?
97
FIVE PERCENT kVp RULE
• Question:
– The exposure factors of 300 mA, 0.07s, and 95 kVp were used to produce a
particular radiographic density and contrast. A similar radiograph can be
produced using 500 mA, 80kVp and ?
a. 0.01 s
b. 0.04 s
c. 0.08 s
d. 0.16 s
98
FIVE PERCENT kVp RULE
• Question:
– The exposure factors of 300 mA, 0.07s, and 95 kVp were used to produce a
particular radiographic density and contrast. A similar radiograph can be
produced using 500 mA, 80kVp and ?
a. 0.01 s
b. 0.04 s
c. 0.08 s
d. 0.16 s
99
MILLIAMPERE-SECONDS (mAs)
100
MILLIAMPERE-SECONDS (mAs)
101
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
• The possibility of the focal spot size altering contrast enough to be visible
is extremely unlikely.
• Focal spot sizes have such a small effect on IR exposure that it is unlikely
that their effect on contrast could be detected.
102
ANODE HEEL EFFECT
• The anode heel effect alters the intensity of radiation and therefore
affects IR exposure, which can affect contrast.
• The intensity of radiation is greater at the cathode end of the tube. This
difference would become visible only with open collimation and a small
anode target angle (less than 12°).
• The anode heel has very little effect on contrast.
103
SOURCE TO IMAGE RECEPTOR DISTANCE
104
OBJECT-TO-IMAGE-RECEPTOR DISTANCE
106
BEAM RESTRICTION
107
BEAM RESTRICTION
108
BEAM RESTRICTION
109
ANATOMICAL PART
111
GRID
112
IMAGE RECEPTOR
• Film/screen
– Determined by D log E curve
– Steeper the slope, greater the contrast
• Digital systems
– Determined by histogram and LUT
– Displayed as various bit depth values
113
RECORDED DETAIL/ SPATIAL
RESOLUTION
115
RECORDED DETAIL
116
SHARPNESS OF IMAGE DETAIL
• It refers to the structural lines or borders of tissues in the image & the
amount of blur of the image
• Controlling Factors:
– Geometric factors
– Focal spot size (primary)
– SID
– OID
117
SHARPNESS OF IMAGE DETAIL
• Influencing Factors:
– Type of intensifying screen used
– The presence of motion
• Sharpest Image Detail:
– Small focal spot size
– Longest SID
– Minimize OID
118
RECORDED DETAIL
• Influencing Factors:
– Type of intensifying screen used
– The presence of motion
• Sharpest Image Detail:
– Small focal spot size
– Longest SID
– Minimize OID
119
VISIBILITY OF IMAGE DETAIL
120
VISIBILITY OF IMAGE DETAIL
121
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
122
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
123
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
• Focal spots are usually not capable of imaging structures smaller than
the focal spots themselves.
• The width of the penumbra (unsharpness) can be mathematically
calculated using the following formula:
124
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
• Question:
– Calculate the penumbra for an image taken with a 1.0-mm focal spot,
at a 400 distance and an OID of 30.
125
FOCAL SPOT SIZE
126
127
DISTANCE
• The distances between the source or focal spot (S), object or part (O),
and image receptor (I) are critical in establishing sufficient spatial
resolution.
SPATIAL
SID PENUMBRA RESOLUTION
SPATIAL
OID PENUMBRA RESOLUTION
128
129
130
IMAGE RECEPTOR
• Digital Systems
• The primary factors affecting the spatial resolution of digital imaging
systems are the detector geometric properties and the image processing
system.
• Factors affecting spatial resolution for Computed Radiography:
1. Phosphor size,
2. Layer thickness
3. Concentration
4. Scanning of the phosphor screen and during the processing phase
131
IMAGE RECEPTOR
132
IMAGE RECEPTOR
• Film Screen
– The resolving power of an intensifying screen depends on three
factors:
1. Phosphor size
2. Phosphor layer thickness
3. Phosphor concentration
133
EFFECTS OF INTENSIFYING-SCREEN FACTORS ON RESOLUTION
134
MOTION
135
VOLUNTARY MOTION
• Voluntary motion is that which is under the direct control of the patient.
• For the most part, this comprises the voluntary nervous system in
cognizant adults (children and incognizant adults may be excepted in
some cases).
• Communication, especially in a manner that establishes a professional
and competent atmosphere, is the best method of controlling voluntary
motion.
136
INVOLUNTARY MOTION
137
EQUIPMENT MOTION
138
COMMUNICATION
139
EXPOSURE TIME REDUCTION
140
IMMOBILIZATION
141
DISTORTION
IMMOBILIZATION
143
DISTORTION
144
DISTORTION
145
146
FACTORS AFFECTING SIZE DISTORTION
147
SOURCE-TO-IMAGE-RECEPTOR DISTANCE
148
149
OBJECT-TO-IMAGE-RECEPTOR DISTANCE
150
151
152
CALCULATING SIZE DISTORTION
153
CALCULATING SIZE DISTORTION
• Question:
– If the SID is 40” (100 cm) and the SOD is 30“
(75 cm), what is the magnification factor? SID
M SOD
154
CALCULATING SIZE DISTORTION
• Question:
– If the SID is 40” and the OID is 2“, what is the
magnification factor? SID
M SOD
155
CALCULATING SIZE DISTORTION
O M
156
CALCULATING OBJECT SIZE
• Question:
– If a projected image measures 5” and the
magnification factor is 1.02, what is the size
of the actual object? I
O M
157
CALCULATING SIZE DISTORTION
• If the image size and the object size are known, the percent of
magnification can be determined using the following formula:
158
CALCULATING SIZE DISTORTION
• Question:
– If an object measures 5 cm and the image measures 6 cm, what
would be the percent of magnification of the object?
159
FACTORS AFFECTING SHAPE DISTORTION
160
SHAPE DISTORTION
161
SHAPE DISTORTION
162
163
164
ALIGNMENT
165
CENTRAL RAY
166
ANATOMICAL PART
167
ANATOMICAL PART
168
Thank You!
James Lawrence Aduche, RRT, RSO
Faculty, Southwestern University - PHINMA
Jbaduche.swu@phinamaed.com