Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

JOHN BENEDICT L.

CANONEO

QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS: CHLORINE AND WATER EFFECTS ON LIGHTBULB


PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY

Authors: Chen Wang, Faizul Azli Mohd-Rahim, Hamzah Abdul-Rahman, Nurul Safwah Mohd
Yusoff

Affiliation:

Email:

Abstract

As a statement of architecture and to save energy, daylighting is frequently included into


buildings. The advantages of daylighting, however, go beyond energy efficiency and
architectural design. For individuals without access to sources of indoor lighting, the invention
known as the solar bottle bulb is both extremely efficient and reasonably priced. The only
resources needed for this idea are a bottle, some roofing materials, water, and a small amount
of commonly available chemicals. Electricity is not required. This essay examines daylighting's
crucial historical viewpoint from the standpoint of solar bottle bulbs. It emphasizes the necessity
of using solar bottle bulbs in underdeveloped regions of the world and the significance of this
creation as a step towards sustainability. The designs, guiding concepts, and uses of the
technology that has jolted the underprivileged into adopting a new way of life are reviewed in
this essay. The review includes an evaluation of internet, print, and journal literature related to
daylighting and solar bottle bulbs.

Introduction

For the visual activities of humans , light is crucial. There won't be any sight without light. People
continue to live in conditions that are far worse than an inexpensive apartment in many of the
developing nations that are also highly populated. Buildings are constructed relatively closely
together and in close proximity to one another, which prevents free natural lighting from entering
the structure and forces building inhabitants to rely heavily on electricity for interior lighting. Due
to their extreme poverty, many disadvantaged households would prefer to live in an
uncomfortable environment, such as relying on indoor kerosene lamps, than pay the exorbitant
cost of power. These underprivileged individuals would forego using light bulbs because they
could not afford the high cost of living, which caused them to dwell in dimly lit environments
(Sarant, 2011).
Review of Related Literature

You might also like