1. The document provides a rubric for evaluating a case study report with criteria in 5 areas: presentation format, development of the case study, resolution of the regression process, resolution of the correlation process, and conclusions.
2. Points are awarded based on the level of completion and justification in addressing each criteria from full points for complete fulfillment to no points for no participation.
3. The rubric evaluates the case study report on presenting information in the proper format, fully developing the case study with justified explanations and arguments, completely resolving the regression and correlation analyses with appropriate calculations and discussions, and providing at least two reasoned conclusions.
1. The document provides a rubric for evaluating a case study report with criteria in 5 areas: presentation format, development of the case study, resolution of the regression process, resolution of the correlation process, and conclusions.
2. Points are awarded based on the level of completion and justification in addressing each criteria from full points for complete fulfillment to no points for no participation.
3. The rubric evaluates the case study report on presenting information in the proper format, fully developing the case study with justified explanations and arguments, completely resolving the regression and correlation analyses with appropriate calculations and discussions, and providing at least two reasoned conclusions.
1. The document provides a rubric for evaluating a case study report with criteria in 5 areas: presentation format, development of the case study, resolution of the regression process, resolution of the correlation process, and conclusions.
2. Points are awarded based on the level of completion and justification in addressing each criteria from full points for complete fulfillment to no points for no participation.
3. The rubric evaluates the case study report on presenting information in the proper format, fully developing the case study with justified explanations and arguments, completely resolving the regression and correlation analyses with appropriate calculations and discussions, and providing at least two reasoned conclusions.
1. The document provides a rubric for evaluating a case study report with criteria in 5 areas: presentation format, development of the case study, resolution of the regression process, resolution of the correlation process, and conclusions.
2. Points are awarded based on the level of completion and justification in addressing each criteria from full points for complete fulfillment to no points for no participation.
3. The rubric evaluates the case study report on presenting information in the proper format, fully developing the case study with justified explanations and arguments, completely resolving the regression and correlation analyses with appropriate calculations and discussions, and providing at least two reasoned conclusions.
ILUMNO LEARNING ACTIVITY CASE STUDY 2 - MODULE FOUR
BREAKDOWN OF THE EVALUATION:
HEADER: Rubric criteria 5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points 1 point No participation 0 points The presentation 1.Presentation formal with all the criteria o of the report fully sections requested complies with the (editorial appropriate y report structure well-written words) formal requested The student presents a excellent The student 2.Development of the case developmentfrom presents good with key aspects of the case, justification development with subject and its explanation. and work proposal few arguments with arguments Resolution of the regression The student The student process (tabulation y The student The student solves partially resolves The student solves very little of graphic from dispersion, solves the entire almost all the partially resolvesthe the development Failure to submit determine the value of "a", regression regression developmentfrom developmentfrom from case study report "b", equation and line of development with development with regression with regressionwithout regression without adjustment) key arguments. key arguments. key arguments key arguments key arguments Resolution of the correlation The student process (calculation of the The student solves very little of Student solves partially resolves The student the development standard error), coefficient Student solves all almost all the partially resolvesthe sample determination and from correlation correlation developmentfrom developmentfrom correlation, confidence correlation development with development with correlation with correlationwithout interval and prediction key arguments. key arguments. key arguments key arguments interval) without 5.At least two conclusions or The student considerations finals The student presents two or as part of the respective presents final more final analysis of the case, which considerations o considerations o evidences arguments conclusions no reasoned statistics and everyday reasoned conclusions reality