Republic of the Philippines

Department of Justice
OFFICE OF THE PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR-CAVITE
Imus City, Cavite

Gen. Mariano Alvarez Water District (GMAWD),

Represented by Atty. Iluminada M. Vaflor-Fabroa,
Complainant/s,

-versus- NPS Docket No. IV-03-INV-23C-0549

For: Violation of Article 142 (Inciting
Louritess Esguerra Cayabyab to Sedition) of the Revised Penal
a.k.a. Lotiz, Code in relation to RA 10175;
Teresita Esguerra, Violation of Section 4(a)(3) and
Daniel Manalo, (c) (4) of Republic Act 10175;
Cathyrine Erison Valmoria, Violation of Republic Act 10173;
Gina Lynn Llegaria Lero, and Intriguing Against Honor in
Michaela Anna Gala Vaje, relation to RA 10175
Melanie Valenzuela Torres,
Bryan Christian Ramos Orleans,
Susan Penoscas Bernal,
Zyrille Joyce Omosura Arocha,
Elisa Arcos Bautista, and
Maria Andrea Aquino Vesca,
Respondent/s
x--------------------------------------------------x

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

This afternoon of September 28, 2023, after I learned that Lotiz

Cayabyab has posted on Facebook the alleged Resolution on the above
entitled case that allegedly was dismissed by the Court and followed by her
post “Sobrang grateful Cong, PANALO po kami” with the message of Atty.
Roy M. Loyola, “Good Morning! Start each day with a grateful heart.” Our
Congressman of the 5th District of Cavite, Atty. Roy M. Loyola, known to be
instrumental to the appointment of some of the Cavite prosecutors said to
be “close” to Lotiz Cayabyab, the Prosecutors have already provided a
copy of the Resolution, without providing the complainant a copy of the
same, thus, I personally went to the Office of the Provincial Prosecutor’s
Office, Imus, Cavite to secure my copy, which is already unusual, for in the
past, the said Office always provided the parties with a copy of the
Resolution by mail and the parties need not go to the Office of the
Provincial Prosecutor to secure a copy unless the said Office will inform the
parties that the Resolution is already for release and for the parties to
come to their Office to get and sign for their copy received.

No such information was received by GMAWD nor of its Board of

Directors nor its General Manager or by the complainant herself
representing the GMAWD. I myself, came to know about it because it was
posted on Facebook by Lotis Cayabyab, telling everyone that they won the
case against GMAWD and posted the Resolution that she received.

The said RESOLUTION contained the following statements:

1. In the instant case, there is no allegation that respondents

acted to incite others to employ force, intimidation, or other
means outside legal methods against GMAWD.
x---------------------------------------------------x