Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Theories in Language Teaching and Learning
Theories in Language Teaching and Learning
Theories in Language Teaching and Learning
Traditional T: authority
Ss: do as told
& Practice on new vocabulary
Literary language
Vocab = grammar
1
Reading and writing, no speaking and listening skilss, no pronun
Culture: literature and fine arts
& Roles of L1: L1 for translating text, for instructions
& Evaluation
2
Ss work hard on vocabulary learning, translation, endless written exercises without much progress in the
mastery of the language an dwith little opportunity to express themselves through it.
Input è intake è output
(reading) (writing)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ss = less passive
T – Ss: like partners (T directs)
& Teaching & Learning process
Means of instructions: L2
Presenting meanings using: visual aids
Ss use L2 a great deal
Situational syllabus: based on situations
Grammar is taught implicitly, inductively (quy nap)
& Interactions T è Ss
Ss è T
Ss è Ss
3
& Language and Culture
Employing:
Say the correct word
Stop right away and use “or” questions for Ss to self-correct
PEDAGOGICAL PROCEDURES
Language instruction is exclusively conducted in the target language.
Language teachers should demonstrate the use of the target language and should not explain or translate.
Language teachers and leaners are more like partners. Leaners are given opportunities to interact with
other leaners.
In this sense, the DM is less teacher centered. The target language is always used in the classroom. Leaners
are continuously exposed to the target language and teachers do not use the native language as a means
instruction;
Basic vocabulary is introduced first. Ss are encouraged to make links between meaning and the target
language. The emphasis is on spoken language and vocabulary is emphasized over grammar;
Grammar is taught inductively. Rules are not given and leaners need to figure them out. L2 leaners need to
discover rules of grammar. Language errors are not corrected as teachers should provide opportunities for
self-correction.
According to DM instructors should approach the teaching of grammar inductively. This is on assumption
that L2 leaners should learn grammar by interpreting contextual and situational cues rather than
receiving long explanations.
The direct method was characteried by the following:
Correct pronunciation is emphasized
Emphasis is on speaking and listening
Vocabulary is taught through known words, real objects, pictures, and miming
Self-correction is encouraged
Curriculum is structured on situations/topics, not on linguistic structures
Communication is at the center
Purpose of language acquisition is to communicate
Some of the typical activities used in the direct method were:
Reading aloud
Question and answer exercise
Student self-correction
Conversation practice
Fill in the blank exercise
Dictation
Map drawing
4
Paragraph writing
MERITS
DM is suitable for private language schools where Ss were highly motivated and where native speaking
teachers could be employed.
The method provides an interesting and exciting ways of learning English through activities.
DM is successful in developing the skill of listening and speaking in very young children in elementary
schools because they have great ability to mimic.
DEFECTS
Ss have to pay high prices for small classes, individual attention and intensive study.
DM is not suitable for public education with constrain of budget, classroom size and teacher
background.
It demands tremendously on the teacher. He should be fluent in L2, and very resourceful in order to
make the meaning clear in a variety of ways without usng L1.
There is not sufficient provision for systematic practice of structures in a planned sequence.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language instructors play the role of leaders and are responsible for providing a good language model.
Learners must imitate this model by imitating anf following instructions
Learners should always be exposed to the target language
Learners are exposed to correct models/patterns of the target L2
Practice consists of a type of exercise called “drills practice” (e.g: repeat, manipulate, or transform a
particular form or structure to complete a task
Ss follow a very structural syllabus
Be able to communicate in L2. Ss should over learn to think in L2 wothout stopping to think in order to
form new habits.
& Roles of T & Ss
T è Ss
Ss è Ss
St è St
& Ss’ feelings: no principles
& Evaluation
Errors are avoided at all costs. (T stops right away and correct)
PEDAGOGICAL PROCEDURES
Typical example in the ALM in relation to drills practice is:
(1) The teacher says models (the word or phrase) and the Ss repeat them
Eg: T: I was tired, so I went to bed.
Ss: I was tired, so I went to bed.
6
(2) The teacher asks Ss to subtitute one word or more to practice different strctures or vocabulary items
Eg: T: I watch TV, She?
Ss: She watches TV.
T: They?
Ss: They watch TV.
(3) T gives Ss certain kind of sentence pattern. Ss are asked to transform this sentence.
Eg: (positive into negative)
T: I like watching football.
Ss: I don’t like watching football.
Dialog memorization
Backward build-up (đọc ngược câu từ sau -> trước)
Repetition drill
Chain drill
Single slot subtitution drill (thế 1 chỗ gạch chân “I eat apple in the kitchen.”)
Multi-slot subtitution drill (thay đổi các thành phần “I eat apples in the park.”)
Transformation drill
Question and answer drill
Use of minimal pairs
Complete dialog
Grammar game
MERITS
ALM develops the mastery of foreign language in all 4 skills, beginning with listening as the basis for
the teaching of reading and writing.
The method develops comprehension and fluency in speaking the FL very early in the Ss’ learning
experience.
Audio lingual materials are more systematical and scientifically designed.
Reading and writing are not neglected. The Ss are trained to build skills in these ares step by step.
Ss enjoy learning to use the target language from the first day of their introduction to it. There is active
participation by all Ss for most of time.
DEFECTS
Ss learn in a mechanical way and may become well-trained parrots.
The technique of memorization and drilling may be intensely tedious and boring. The successful
application of audio lingual techniques requires inventiveness and resourcefulness on the part of the
teacher who has to vary the presentation of material and use differnet type of drills and exercises to create
interest.
This method is appropriate for young children who love to mimic and act out roles and to learn through
activities than through explanations and the learning of facts. Adult learners are used to organizing the
material they are learning, so the approach is appropriate if memorization and drilling are accompanied
by some explanation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7
THE TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE METHOD (TPR)
THE MAIN PRINCIPLES
James Asher’s Total Physical Response Method is a comprehension-based method to language teaching.
The method assumes that language acquisition should start with understanding the language we hear or
read before we proceed to production. It is a method of language teaching that makes use of physical
movements to react to verbal input.
The Total Physical Response Method assumes that understanding language input plays a key and
primary role in language acquistion.
A set of principles were set to help L2 leaners to increse their understanding of the language to which they
are exposed:
Instructors provide L2 learners with a nonverbal model that they need to imitate. Only after an
initial period of conprehension of the target language, learners will be able to speak.
Initally, language instructors issue commands and then perform the actions with students. Later
on, Ss demonstrate an understanding of the commands by performing them alone
Vocabulary and grammar learning are the skills emphasized.
Understanding should precede producting. When ready to speak, instructors should let Ss make
errors and should be tolerant
Language instructors create a relaxed and stress-free environment where Ss focus on meaning
interpreted by movement.
The main characteristic of this method is that its focuses on meaning and comprehension. Verbal
response is not necessary and Ss become performers. Verbal response is not necessary as the main
focus is listening and acting.
REVIEWING THE PRINCIPLES
& Goals
Facilitate Ss’ experience of learning a foreign language by reducing the stress Ss might feel
& Role of Ts and Ss
T: director
Ss: imitators
When Ss are ready to speak è roles of Ts and Ss reverse
& Teaching and learning process
T è Ss Ss 1 Ss
T è St (individual) Ss 1 Ts
& Ss’ feelings
8
There not be too much modeling + Ss not be too rushed è Feelings of success and low anxiety facilitate
learning.
& Language and culture
& Role of L1
Introduce TPR è rarely would the native language be used è Meaning is made clear through body
movements.
& Evaluation
9
TPR is inclusive and works well a class with mixed ability levels.
TPR is good for kinesthetic learners (nhữ ng ngườ i họ c thô ng qua thự c hà nh) who need to be active in
class.
TPR is good tool for building vocabulary.
Actions help build connections in the brain by using TPR.
TPR helps learners achieve fluency faster by immersing learners in activities that involve them in
situational language use.
TPR works well for child and adult leaners.
DEFECTS
TPR is the most useful for beginners.
Preparation becomes an issue for teachers at higher levels
Ss are not generally given the opprtunity to express their own thought in as creative maner.
It is easy to over use TPR and begin to bore Ss.
TPR may limit teachers in term of scope of language that can be addressed.
TPR can be a major challenge for shy Ss.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The main assumption behind this approach was that communicative language teaching programs will lead to
the development of both Linguistic Competence and Communicative Competence.
Linguistic competence : vocab, gram, knowledge about the language
Communicative competence: the usage
In the 1980s one could talk of a “fever” for the Communicative Language Teaching Approach. CLT
was considered to be a type of instruction, an approach to language teaching rather than a method.
CLT makes us consider language not only in terms of its structures but also in terms of the
communicative functions that it performs. Therefore, this approach aims at understanding what
people do with language forms when they communicate. The CLT Approach is a student-centered type
of instruction, a very revolutionary approach to language teaching.
CLT Approach represents a philosophy of teaching that is based on communicative language use.
If the language classroom can become an area of co-operative negotiation, joint interpretation, and the
expression, then the language teacher is in the position to give the students the opportunity for
spontaneous, unpredictable exploratory production of language when involved in classroom language
tasks.
The main contribution of this new type of instruction is the shift from attention to the grammatical
forms to the communicative properties of the language. The language instructor creates the
opportunity and the conditions in the classroom for learners to interact in a communicative way. This is
10
to say that the L2 learner has someone to talk to, something to talk about, and a desire to understand and
to make himself/herself understood. If that happens, language acquistion can take place naturally and
teaching can be extremely effective.
This approach encouraged the development of communicate competence (eg: grammatical competence,
pragmatic competence, sociolinguistic competence and strategic competence)
This approach considers learners’ needs a matter of priority
This approach suggests that a language syllabus should be based on notional/functional principles and
communicative competence
This approach commits to message-orientated use of ther target language in the classroom.
The main characteristics of this approach:
The meaning is emphasized over form. Genuine questions (ask question to which Ss do not know
the answer) as opposed to display questions (type of questions asked to make Ss display knowledge)
are used because there is a focus on meaning rather than form
Learners should have considerable exposure to the second language speech from the teacher and
other learners and instructors should provide opportunities for learners to play an active role.
The role of the language instructor is to construct dynamic classroom tasks(architect) and encourage
learner’s participation and contribution (resource person or co-builder). To that end, the materials that
the instructor uses must permit these new roles.
Therefore, the traditional question/answer task should be supplanted by a task-oriented activity. By
providing a series of tasks to complete, the tutor plays the role of architect, encouraging learners to take
responsibility for generating the information themselves rather than just receiving it.
Communication is defined by the expression, interpreation, and negotiation of meaning. Learners
teachers must make some mutual efforts to understand interactions and negotiate meaning. Negotiation of
meaning can be defined as any phonologically, lexically and morpho-syntacically to resolve
difficulties in mutual understanding that impede the course of their communication
Comprehensible and meaning-bearing input promotes acquisition. Simplifications of the input
through the use of the contextual props, cues and gestures also promote acquisition. Comprehension
activities should be used without initial requirement for Ss to speak in the target language. The main
function of language teaching is to provide comprehensible input (useful especially for beginners and
foreign language learners) that leads to a low filter (high motivation and low anxiety). Little pressure
should be exercised for learners to perform at a high level of accuracy and in the early stages,
comprehension is emphasized over production
Classroom activities should be designed to evoke communication and not be wasted in grammatical
lectures or manipulative and mechanical exercises
Learners must be involved in learning tasks that allow them to perform a range of communicative
dunctions with the target L2. Communicative language teaching should encourage the use of a variety
of discourse tasks
Grammar should be learned communicatively. Learners should be provided with communicative tasks
that contain enough samples of the linguistic features that learners are trying to learn. Learners must be
engaging in communicative tasks where grammar is enhanced using different techniques (eg: input
enhancement, consciousness rasing, input flood, structured input tasks)
The amount of correction in the L2 classroom must be kept to a minimum, as the emphasis must be to
allow learners to express themselves. In the CLT Approach, error correction is seen as having a negative
effect on learners in terms of lowering their motivation and attitude. An alternative form of
correction might be done by the teacher by repeating what the Ss have said with the correct form
(recasting) or using other forms of corrective feedback such as negative enhancement techniques.
Negative enhancement techniques would involve providing learners with some information about
the incorrectness of the particular use of a form/structure by enhancing the mistake in different ways
(e.g: facial expression or offering a quizzical look)
PEDAGOGICAL PROCEDURES
The three main activities proposed in this approach are:
11
(1) activities that involve communication promote second language acquisition;
(2) activities that involve completion of real tasks promote second language acquisition;
(3) meaningful activities that make use of authentic language to promote second language acquisition
The 3 main features of all communicative activities are:
One person knows something the other one does not (information gap)
The speaker has a choice
The main purpose of the activity is achieved based upon the information that is received form the
listener (feedback)
Typical communicative language teaching activity is an information-gap activity. This is an activity where
learners are missing the information to complete a task successful. They need to talk to each other to
find the information to complete the task.
For example, Learner A has a biography of a famous person with all the place names missing, while learner
B has the same text with all the dates missing. Together they can complete the text by asking each other the
relevant questions to collect the relevant information to complete the task.
The main activities used in CLT are:
Information gap activities
Jigsaw activities
Opinion-sharing activities
Role plays
Language games
Scrambled sentences
Communicative grammar tasks
Exchange information tasks
Discourse type tasks
Picture strip story
REVIEW
& Role of T and Ss
Teacher:
Presentation/ Pre-stage: Instructor, controller organizer, motivator,…
Practice/While-stage: Facilitator, advisor, participant, assessor,..
Production/Post-stage: Feedback giver, corrector
Ss: Communicators
Center in classroom
& Teaching/Learning process
(T establishes situations)
T Ss
Ss Ss (group work)
St St (pair work)
12
T’s talking time < Ss’ talking time
& Ss’ feelings
Accuracy + fluency
T can informally evaluate Ss’ performance during group work.
(formal) an integrative test having a real communicative function.
T’s response to Ss’ error
Errors of forms are tolerated during fluency-based activities
T notes Ss’ error and deal with them later with an accuracy-based activities.
Langauge functions: things we do with languag:
Requesting enquiring suggesting
Warning greeting describing
Agreeing promising apologizing
Reporting advising
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TASK-BASED LANGUAGE TEACHING (TBL)
THE MAIN PRINCIPLES
Task-based language teaching became initially popular in the 1990s. it referred to a type of language
teaching that takes “tasks” as its key units designing and implementing language instruction. The
main principles of the TBL approach are:
Learners should be provided with opportunities that make the language input receive more
comprehensible;
Learners should be engaged in contexts in which they need to produce output which others can
understand;
Learners should be exposed to real-life language situations in the language classroom.
TBL aims at providing L2 learners with a natural context to use the target language.
The goal of this approach is to promote communication and to develop fluency by attempting to use the
L2 in real operating conditions. Learners work to complete a task and have plenty of opportunities for
interaction and nefotiation of meaning as they have to understand each other and express their own
meaning.
The essential characteristics of a task in this approach are:
Meaning must play a key role
The participants choose the linguistic resources to perform the task
Learners must resolve a communication-based world problem
Learners will be assessed in terms of the task outcome
TBL aims at integating all 4 language skills (Speaking, R, L & W) and providing opportunities for the
learners to experiment with explore both spoken and written language through learning activities that are
designed to engage L2 learners in the authentic, practical, and functional use of language for meaningful
purposes (e.g: to cultivate the learners’ communicative competence).
PEDAGOGICAL PROCEDURES
& Goals
Facilitate Ss language learning bu engaging them in a variety of tasks that have a clear outcome.
& Role of T and Ss
A pre-task phase typically begins a task sequence. T can introduce Ss to the language they will need to
complete the task. The tasks are meaningful and relevant so that the Ss are the reason for doing the task and
can see how the task relates to possible situations in their lives outside the classroom.
A task cycle phase: Ss are actively engaged with the task, with the teacher monitoring their performace and
intervening when necessary. The task has clear outcomes to that both Ss and Ts can tell if the task has been
successfully completed.
A post-task phase takes place to reinforce Ss’ learning or to address any problems that may have arisen.
& Interaction
(T establishes tasks)
15
T è Ss
Ss è Ss (group work)
St è St (pair work)
& Ss’ feelings
Ss are motivated by doing tasks that prepare them for the real world.
& Language & culture
T consantly evaluates Ss in light of task outcomes and the language they use.
& T’s response to Ss’ error
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE LEXICAL APPROACH
The lexical approach is less concerned with Ss production and more concerned that Ss receive and
comprehend abundant input. Particularly at lower levels, Ts talk extensively to their Ss in the target
16
language, while requiring little or no verbal response from them. Ss are also given exercises and activities
that raise their awareness about multi-word lexical items, such as “I see what you mean”, and “Take your
time”.
Lewis emphasizes acquisition over learning assuming that “it is exposure to enough suitable input, not
formal teaching; which is key to increasing the learner’s lexicon. (Lewis 1997:197)
“Vocabulary acquisition is the target and most important task facing the language learner.”
v Why is the lexical approach so helpful?
Learning chunks of natural language saves “processing time” – Ss don’t have to build a sentence from
grammatical beginnings.
Helps learners sound more natural.
v Using language chunks in class
Even teaching “how are you?” to young learners – hopefully you don’t break down the sentence into its
grammatical components and explain them, you just teel them what it means.
You probably also teach them useful classroom phrases – “what does “X” mean?”, “Please can I go to the
bathroom?” and so on.
v Teaching Lexical Chunks
The best way is little and often. Whenever you come across an appropriate chunk, you can introduce it to the
class. Whatever system of recording vocabulary you ask your Ss to use, do the same with your lexical
chunks.
Make sure that you keep a record of the lexical chunks you’ve introduced to each class and be sure to use
them in context whenever you can.
Ss actually enjoy searching for items using concordance printout from a corpus. Keep the task simple. You
can make it into a game by challenging pairs or groups of Ss to come up with the most lexical chunks
meeting a certain criteria. For example: find colour collocations based on food and drink, (mustard-yellow)
find 2 colour collocations with “y” (orange-yellow)
ADVANTAGES OF THE LEXICAL APPROACH
It develops learner’s proficiency with lexis or words combinations.
Central to the lexical approach is ther focus on teaching real English and a shift away from the artificial
language found in ELT textbook and which is drawn form the intuition of textbook designers.
Emphasis is on successful communication not grammatical mastery.
Language is not learnt by learning individual sound and structures and then combining them, but by an
increasing ability to break down wholes into parts.
17
Lexcial approach advocates argue that language consists of meaningful chunks that, when combined,
produce continuous coherent text, and only a minority of spoken sentences are entirely novel creations.
DISADVANTAGES
Language cannot be simply divided into different units in real life.
Some topics that are traditionally considered advanced can actually be taught at much lower levels.
Ts and learners need training in using computational tools to analyse data received from technological
corpara.
It still need to be demonstrated how a lexically based theory of language and language learning can be
applied at the levels of design and procedure in language teaching, suggesting that it is still an idea in
search of an approach an a methodology.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE ELECTIC APPROACH (PP TONG HOP)
THE MAIN PRINCIPLES
“The successful teacher usually organizes and makes a blend of methods he/she thinks are appropriate. Each
method has its value and uniqueness on one side and its difficulties and disadvantages on the other side.”
Larsen-freeman(2000) and Mellow (2000) both have used the term principled eclecticism to describe a
desirable, coherent, pluralistic approach to language teaching.
Larsen-freeman (2000) “when Ts who subscribe to the pluralistic view of methods pick and choose from
among methods to create their own blend, their practice is said to be eclectic.”
Eclecticism involves the use of a variety of language learning activities, each of which may have very
different characteristics and may be motivated by different underlying assumption. The use eclecticism is
due to the fact that there are strengths as well as weaknesses of single theory based methods.
The use of eclecticism does not mean to mix up different approaches randomly. There must have some
philosophical backgrounds and some systemetic relation among different activities. Usually it is
recommended to mix structural approaches with communicative use of language.
18
19