Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Purchase and Sale Agreements Part 2
Purchase and Sale Agreements Part 2
Formalities
Contract for sale of land
Formalities for contract of sale of land
Influence of the Consumer Protection Act o formalities
Consequences of non-compliance with formalities
Formalities
Contractual formalities are there to serve as a guide to parties against any unforeseen circumstances
that may lead to litigation. The general rule of common law is that no formalities are required for a
valid or enforceable contract of sale, however, certain statutory formalities are required for the valid
contract of purchase and sale of immovable property. The parties themselves may also (where no
statutory formalities are required) agree to certain formalities for their contract. Their intention has to
be examined carefully, as two possible reasons for such agreement could exist:
- That the contract will only be valid after the formalities are compiled with; or
- That the formalities will only serve as proof of an existing contract between the
parties in which case a valid contract already exists before the formalities are
complied with
Where formalities are required by statute, the parties cannot, as a general rule, change, exclude or
abandon these formalities through mutual agreement.
Important concepts:
- Alienate: means to sell, exchange or donate irrespective of the fact that it is subject to a
suspensive or resolutive condition
- Land: includes any unit; any right claim transfer of land; any undivided share in land
- Deed of alienation: is described as a document or documents in terms of which land is
alienated, and has a wider meaning of “contract”
The Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 requires that the sale of immovable property be reduced to
writing and signed by both parties or their agents
Section 2(1) of the Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981 which commended on 19 October 1982,
requires the following formalities with regard to contracts for the purchase and sale of land
(a) Contract must be written:
The deed of alienation must contain all the essentialia as well as any other term expressly
raised or implied in the negotiations and regarded as material by the parties
A material term is one that the parties regard as important enough to insert in the contract
Agents
- An agent can act on behalf of either a seller or a buyer (as a principal) only where a sale of
land is concluded, if the agent has the written authority to act on behalf of his/her principal.
- The written authority must already exist at the time of conclusion of the contract and the agent
must have knowledge thereof.
- An agent cannot act on behalf of a trust still to be formed.
- Such a deed of alienation will be null and void, because one cannot act as an agent on behalf
of a principal who does not exist at the time of the representative act.
- A company, being a legal entity, cannot itself sign any agreement and cannot provide its
functionaries with written authority to sign on its behalf.
- In terms of section 66(1) of the Companies Act, the business and affairs of a company must
be managed by or under the direction of its board, which has the authority to exercise all of
the powers and perform any of the functions of the company except to the extent that the Act
or the company’s Memorandum of Incorporation (MOI) provides otherwise.
- The contracting powers of directors and managers may be declared in the MOI
The Consumer Protection Act does not require agreements in general to be in writing. If the
agreement is in writing it needs to be signed by a consumer [section 50(1) and (2)]. If the agreement is
in writing, such written agreement should be in plain and understandable language [section 22].
The following are the legal consequences where the formalities are not compiled with the Alienation
of Land Act:
1. The contract is null and void. No legal obligation exists between the parties
2. If one of the parties delivered the whole part of his/her performance, he/she cannot claim
counter-performance from the other party
3. Any party who delivered such performance is entitled to reclaim his/her performance from
another party
4. The buyer who has made performance in terms of the invalid contract is entitled to claim the
following from the seller interest at the prescribed interest rate and reasonable compensation
5. The seller who allowed the buyer to possess the land is entitled to claim the following from
the buyer:
a. Reasonable compensation for the buyer’s occupation, use and enjoyment of the land
b. Compensation for any intentional or negligent damages caused to the land by the
actions of the buyer or someone whose actions he/she is responsible.
6. Where both parties delivered complete performances in terms of a contract which is actually
null and void because of the fact that the formalities were not complied with, the contract is
deemed to have been valid and binding from the time of conclusion thereof.
1. You must first and foremost identify the problem and identify the applicable principle in the
question.
2. Provide the theory of the principle/or rule that regulates that particular problem.
3. Most importantly, apply the theory of the principle to the problem or the set of facts
(scenario) and show that you are applying the theory of the principle to the scenario.
4. Lastly, based on the application of the theory of the principle conclude.