Adjudicator 8th of March

This House believes that it is within the interest of progressive religious

leaders to support the childfree movement

1st Proposition : ABI

•Altenative✔

•State the Stance clearly

•Definition (only about 'child free') you forget to explain about the characteristics of this motion
(progressive religious leaders, support, child free)

•Find the BoP :

-Why it should a progressive religious leaders?

-Why they can give a big impact/influence, at the moment they support child free, that happening
on the society?

•Try to reduce the repetition words

•On the 1st Argument "It will protect the humanity choice"

- Still missing the evidence or the example case in current situation

-It's important to make your argument more relevant, rather than you didn't give any specific
evidence or case.

•Your speech should contain about :

-Give definition clearly (Analyze the heading and the characteristic)

-Urgency

-Give alternative on your side

-State clearly your goal/stance

-Proof the BoP clearly

-Argument (Assertion, Reasoning,Evidence, Link back)

-Pre-empetive (even if....)

1st Opposition : ALFAREL

•1st Oppo still swept away by the case of government team (still follow the misconception)
meanwhile it's actually about 'why it's become so important when progressive religious leaders to
support children movements'

•State your goals clearly (i.e. it's not ethics for them, vice versa they want to more protect their
religion, their own beliefs)

•It's better the opening of your speech, start with clarification

•Still miss about the alternative

•On the 1st Argument "Broke the fundamentally/the existence of religion path, especially as the
religious leaders, in which they become the role model in their religion"

•Don't answer the POI too long with the same meaning or purpose, it will just wasting your time

•On the 2nd Argument was similar with 1st argue

•Missing about the parameters (for both sides)

•Miss about the pre-empetive (even if..)

2nd Proposition : THALYA

•Good enough, but the point that you've delivered was powerful if the 1st speaker start to bring it
from the first of debate, rather than 1st speaker just simply state about 'human have their own
right'

•1st Argument quite good "will stop pluralism people/primordialism become more open minded"

•You can try to more elaborate about 'Push back from traditionalist and reducing social stigma'

•2nd Argument was fulfilled the A-R-E-L on how it will create the awareness of people about
population growth

•You forgot to more highlight the alternative and comparison

•More notice about the pre-empetive

2nd Opposition : NURLINDA

•It's good to start your speech with clarification, that it's just lead to part within the community
and potentially drive away people who don't agree with the stance

•Starting from the 2nd speaker, the matter of the debate was clear

•More elaborate with the 1st speaker idea/arguments

•You can input another alternative from your side.

3rd Proposition : AQILA

•More Highlight about the 'Religious Leaders'

•Miss about the comparison

•Don't often include personal point of view

•Highlight about the exclusivity

•More elaborate about the impact of your side core-idea

•Elaborate more about : "Why at the end it's really inappropriate for religious leaders to support
the children movements in current situation or with the society? "

3rd Opposition : INTAN

•More elaborate "Which side matter in this debate

•Highlight about which side can create a better situation in current and in the long-term

Reply-Speech Oppo : NURLINDA

•Glorify your identity team

•Create the comparisons from both sides more profitable with your sides

•More Reinforce your team's point

Reply-Speech Propo : THALYA

•Create more scathing comments to the opponents

•More highlight about the comparisons (benefits, the most relevant case/evidence, long-term)