Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CEL6 Cases
CEL6 Cases
The following extracts are real descriptions of experiences that UK and US medical students have
encountered whilst on global health electives. They are taken from the work of Peluso et al (2018)
and Monrouxe and Rees (2017).
This case highlights the issue of economic disparity between visiting elective students from resource-
rich countries and the patients they may meet in resource-poor countries. The bus fares that this
patient needed would be equivalent to about £4 sterling – something that the visiting students could
probably easily afford to donate.
Do you think the student was right to decline to see the patient without a doctor present to
supervise them? Can you articulate the reasons why you hold this opinion?
Can you identify any other possible courses of action that the student could have taken?
Would they have been better or worse than declining to see the patient?
How might cultural differences have influenced this student’s conversation with the nurse,
and the student’s perception of what was happening?
Case 3- from a student on elective in Indonesia
“We saw a 16-year-old girl who was admitted because she overdosed on cough syrup and
benzodiazepines after her boyfriend broke up with her. She was admitted overnight, and I saw her
with the team the next morning on rounds. She was not having any worrisome symptoms from the
medications, so the team was planning to send her home. A visiting medical volunteer asked if the
girl was having any thoughts of hurting or killing herself, and the Indonesian doctors said “we can't
really ask that directly,” indicating that asking patients about suicidal ideation was not culturally
acceptable. She was sent home without anyone taking a thorough psychiatric history.”
Would it ever be acceptable in the UK for a 16-year-old to be discharged after treatment for
an overdose without anyone asking her about suicidal ideation?
Does difference on any of the dimensions of culture that we have been looking at in this
unit, or other cultural differences explain any difference in practice between the UK and
Indonesia?
How would you categorise this student’s response to encountering difference in practice,
according to the advocacy-enquiry quadrants that was described in the lecture and reading?
Can you use this advocacy-enquiry model to suggest other ways that the visitors could have
approached this situation with the local team?
Why might the doctors have carried on with the procedure under these circumstances?
Do you think continuing with the procedure was bad practice, regardless of cultural context?
Why?
How might cultural differences or unconscious bias have influenced the doctors’ perception
that it was appropriate to continue with the procedure, and the student’s perception that it
was not?
In addition to the language barrier that the student identified, how might cultural
differences have made communication between the student and the doctors more difficult?