MICR3214 Microbial Interactions2019

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 48

9/8/2019

Welcome to MICR3214:
Molecular Microbiology

Paul D. Brown, PhD


Professor of Molecular Biology
(Infectious diseases and basic science)

Course coordinator
Email: paul.brown@uwimona.edu.jm

INTRODUCTION TO MOLECULAR
MICROBIOLOGY – LECTURES
• Microbial interactions: Environmental sensing;
Quorum sensing (4 L)
• Microbe-host interactions (4 L)
• TEST 1 (1 hr; MCQ)
• Microbial pathogenesis (4 L)
• Comparative and environmental genomics (5 L)
• Using whole genome sequencing to track bacterial
and viral pathogens (2 L)
• Stationary phase; Stringent response (2 L)
• (Drug development and reverse vaccinology)
• TEST 2 (1 hr; MCQ)

1
9/8/2019

INTRODUCTION TO MOLECULAR
MICROBIOLOGY – LABS
• Stress-Induced Mutagenesis (ASM webinar)
– report required
• Tiny conspiracies (ASM webinar) – no report
• Quorum sensing in bacteria (2 wks)
• Lectin agglutination
• Visit to Serology/Immunology section,
Microbiology Department
• Assessing virulence/pathogenesis using a
plant model (2 wks)
• Bioinformatics Exercise (2 wks)

INTRODUCTION TO MOLECULAR
MICROBIOLOGY - STRUCTURE
• Lectures – Thursdays/Fridays at 9 am
• Tutorials – To be decided (Wednesdays at 8 am)
• Labs – Mondays at 1 pm

• Recommended texts:
• Brock’s Biology of Microorganisms. Madigan et al.,
latest edition;
• Jawetz, Melnick and Adelberg’s Medical Microbiology.
Brooks et al. 25th edn. Lange. 2010;
• Medical Microbiology and Immunology. Levinson, 12th
edn. Lange, 2012;
• Bacterial Pathogenesis: A Molecular Approach. Salyers
& Whitt, latest edn.; ASM Press
• Course website: http://ourvle.mona.uwi.edu

2
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions

L1. Microbial Interactions

Overall Learning Outcomes:

• Students should be able to discuss


how microbes interact with each
other in their environment.

3
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions

Specific Learning Outcomes

Should be able to satisfactorily discuss/describe:


 Environmental sensing and interaction with other
organisms

 Two-component signal transduction

 Koch’s postulates, virulence, virulence factors and


their regulatory networks

 Quorum Sensing in Gram positive and Gram


negative microbes

Microbial Interactions
• The numerous types of microorganisms that exist
in nature rarely occur alone; rather they occur as
populations within complex biological
communities.

• Within these communities, interactions occur


among microbial, plant, animal, and human
populations.

• The categories used to describe these


interactions represent a conceptual
classification system, however, many specific
cases are difficult to classify without ambiguity.

4
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions
Neutralism
• This concept implies a lack of interaction
between two microbial populations.

• It occurs when microbial populations are spatially


distant from each other, where one microbial
population does not sense the presence of the
other.

• E.g. a pathogenic microbe invading the root of a


plant vis-à-vis microbes inhabiting leaf surfaces

Microbial Interactions
Commensalism (“at the table together”)
• One population benefits while the other
remains unaffected (not obligatory).

• Microflora of the oral, respiratory, and GI tracts


important for development of immunity.

• E. coli is acquired shortly after birth and this


encounter places some infants at risk for E. coli
meningitis during the first month of life.
• Symptomatic infections with C. albicans can
occur in the first year of life.

5
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions
Commensalism “at the table together”
• Host vs Microbe: Microbiome
– 1% of human genome – retroviruses
– 10-100-fold more microbial cells than human (1013)
cells

• Relationship could borders on mutualism


(clownfishes and sea anemones)
– Clownfishes actually may attract other fishes on
which the anemone can feed.

• Epiphytic bacteria living on the surface of


other organisms.

Microbial Interactions
Synergism: “working together”

• Both populations benefit from the


interaction, however, the association is not
obligatory.

• E.g. the relationship between Chlorobium and


Spirillum and Chlorobium and Desulfovibrio,
which is based on the cycling of carbon and
sulfur.

• Chlorobium reduces CO2 and oxidizes H2S;


Desulfovibrio and Spirillum oxidize organic C and
reduce sulfur to H2S.

6
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions
Mutualism (Symbiosis)
• This can be considered as an
extension of synergism; however,
this is an obligatory relationship
where both populations benefit.

• Possibly most famous is lichen;


actually hundreds of “species”

• Interaction between the two


microbes allows them to act as if
they were a single organism with a
unique identity

Microbial Interactions
Competition
• This represents a negative relationship
between two populations in which both
populations are adversely affected with
respect to their survival and growth.

• This occurs when two populations utilize the same


resources, whether it is space or limited
nutrients.

• Here no toxins or inhibitory substances are


produced by either organism, but the rapid
growth of one out-competes the other for the
resources.

7
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions
Amensalism (Antagonism)
• Microbes that produce substances toxic to
competing populations will naturally have a
competitive advantage.

• The oxidation of sulfur by Thiobacillus


thiooxidans produces sulfuric acid reducing the
pH of aquatic habitats.

• Yeast produces ethanol during fermentation,


which is inhibitory to the growth of other
microbes. Etc…

Microbial Interactions
Parasitism

• The parasite derives its


nutritional requirements
from the population that is
harmed, the host.

• The host-parasite
relationship is
characterized by a
relatively long period of
contact.

8
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions
Parasitism
The influenza virus
takes over healthy
cells, spreads through
the body and causes
illness.

Signs and symptoms


include fever, chills,
muscle aches and
malaise.

Microbial Interactions
Parasitism

Infection with Candida


fungus can lead to
problems such as
diaper rash, vaginal
yeast infections and
oral thrush.

9
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions
Predation
Predation usually occurs when one organism, the
predator, engulfs and digests the prey.

The two-stage life cycle of


the bacterial predator
Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus

Microbial Interactions
Predation
A Bdellovibrio predator and the killed prey cell
in which it is growing are together termed a
bdelloplast.

As with parasitism, predation is a mechanism of


population control that dampens (or
attenuates) population explosions and
prevents exhaustion of nutritional resources of
the habitat that would lead to severe population
crashes.

10
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions
Environmental Sensing
• Bacteria need to sense changes in
environmental conditions and respond
rapidly to ensure their survival by adjusting
their metabolic processes to take advantage
of the current situation.

• Bacteria have a wide range of regulatory


responses to adaptive opportunities, for example,
when nutrients become available transport and
processing machinery are produced to utilize
them.

Microbial Interactions
Environmental Sensing
• Sensory systems mediate gene expression during
host invasion by pathogens.

• Stress conditions such as antibiotics, heavy


metals, starvation, or exposure to UV radiation,
elicit changes in gene expression that lead to
effective coping mechanisms.

• The machinery responsible for these adaptive


responses (stimulus detection, signal processing
and production of output responses) is common
to all cell sensory systems.

11
9/8/2019

Microbial Interactions
Environmental Sensing
• This recognition and processing of environmental
signals through signal transduction pathways
utilizes reversible protein phosphorylation.

Environmental Sensing
• In simple microbial systems, information
from sensory receptors feeds into a
circuitry of regulatory proteins that
transfer high energy phosphoryl groups
from histidine (His; H) to aspartate
(Asp; D) side chains.

• This phosphotransfer network couples


environmental signals to an array of
response elements that control cell
motility and regulate gene expression.

12
9/8/2019

Environmental Sensing

• A two component system is called "two


component" for historical and personal
reasons.

• Prior to the use of the phrase "two


component" in this context, most gene
regulation proteins that were known were
single proteins, often homodimers or
homotetramers, which bound to two ligands:

– a metabolic intermediate
– a cis-acting gene regulation element

Environmental Sensing

The first
component
functions as a
sensor; the
second is a
response
regulator.

13
9/8/2019

Environmental Sensing

• The consequence of ligand binding, an


altered state of the regulatory protein (aka
conformational change), was directed to
the appropriate gene(s) by the protein's
DNA binding activity.

• Eventually, studies of the arabinose


utilization pathway in E. coli showed that
one could also have positive regulation, in
which the protein stimulated gene
expression.

Environmental Sensing

• In the mid-1980s, it had become clear that some


regulatory systems required more than one
protein component.
• The primary examples known at that time were:

 EnvZ/OmpR - osmoregulation in E. coli


 PhoR/PhoB - phosphate scavenging in E. coli
 NtrB/NtrC - nitrogen assimilation in a
variety of bacteria
 DctB/DctD - dicarboxylate transport in
Rhizobium leguminosarum
 VirA/VirG - virulence by Agrobacterium
tumefaciens

14
9/8/2019

Virulence and its Regulation

• Virulence, or the ability to cause an


infectious disease, is always
multifactorial, since the infectious
disease process is invariably complex.

• Different virulence factors are required by


the pathogenic microorganism at each
stage of the process to cause a disease.

Virulence and its Regulation

Virulence Factors

• The classical virulence factor is the bacterial


toxin, however, it could be any component of
the microbe that is required for, or that
increases its ability to cause disease.

• A German microbiologist, Robert Koch, realized


that if the new discipline of infectious disease
was ever to become respectable, it had to have a
rigorous scientific basis. (coming out of the era of
miasmic theories of infection)

15
9/8/2019

Virulence and its Regulation


Koch’s Postulates:

 Association of the microbe with the lesions of the


disease (diseased tissue) but not in normal tissue

 Isolating the bacterium in pure culture

 Showing that the isolated bacterium causes


disease in humans or animals

 Re-isolating the bacterium from the intentionally


infected animal (or human).

KOCH’S POSTULATES

• Microbe found in diseased tissue but not in


normal tissue

• Microbe can be isolated from diseased tissue


as pure culture

• Microbe can cause disease when inoculated


in animal or man

• Microbe must then be re-isolated in pure


culture from animal or man

16
9/8/2019

ISSUES WITH KOCH’S POSTULATES


• Microbe found in diseased tissue but not in
normal tissue
• Pathogen can be a colonizer and only sometimes
cause disease (Staph. aureus, Helicobacter pylori)
• Microbe can be isolated from diseased tissue as
pure culture
• Organism may be non-culturable (T. pallidum)PCR
• Disease may require multiple organisms
• Microbe can cause disease when inoculated in
animal or man
• Gonococcus has no animal model
• Microbe must then be re-isolated in pure culture
from animal or man
• Disease requires multiple microbes (periodontal
disease)
• (Therapeutic or preventative measures
eliminates disease)

MOLECULAR KOCH’S POSTULATES:


DEFINING VIRULENCE FACTORS

• Virulence gene is associated with bacteria


that cause disease but is absent or inactive
in strains that fail to cause disease
• Redundant virulence factors
• Ex: PVL+ community-acquired S. aureus (CA-
MRSA)
• Disrupt gene in virulent strainavirulence
• Redundant virulence factors
• Ex: PVL- CA-MRSA
• Introduce cloned gene into avirulent strain
virulence
• Ex: Lab MRSA+PVL
• Gene is expressed during infection

17
9/8/2019

UP-TO-DATE KOCH’S POSTULATES:


DEFINING NEW PATHOGENS
ASSOCIATED WITH DISEASE

• Metagenomics: bulk sequencing (16S


rRNA or random) to define new species,
new genes, and/or new pathways
• Microarray identification
• Nucleic acid sequence of putative pathogen is
present during disease and at sites of disease
• Nucleic acid sequence of pathogen is absent
or reduced in healthy controls
• Dose response

L2. Virulence Gene Regulatory


Networks
Global Regulation of Virulence in
Bordetella pertussis (Whooping Cough)

The early B.pertussis isolates


• Have distinctive colonial morphology
• Produce a variety of toxins:
– adenylate cyclase, pertussis toxin,
dermonecrotic toxin, and hemolysin

• Possess surface components that are


thought to aid in establishing infection
– pili, filamentous hemagglutinin, capsule,
and several unique outer membrane
proteins.

18
9/8/2019

Virulence Gene Regulatory Networks


Global Regulation of Virulence in Bordetella pertussis

• Alternates between a virulent +


(bvg+) and an avirulent (bvg-)
state

• Virulent form rapidly becomes biofilm


avirulent if grown at 25oC (close to
the temp of external nares) rather
than 37oC (the internal body temp)
and vice versa

• Concentrations of Mg2+ and


nicotinic acid also modulate the
virulent state Nicotinic acid 0.8 mM 4mM

Virulence Gene Regulatory Networks

Global Regulation of Virulence in Bordetella


pertussis

Virulence
genes, fha,
ptx,
siderophore
production

19
9/8/2019

Virulence Gene Regulatory Networks

Global Regulation of Virulence in Bordetella pertussis

• A-B toxin: A (active) and B (binding) subunits


• The toxin attaches to the host cell via the B
subunit, allowing the A fragment to enter the cell
and act in the cytoplasm.
• Pertussis toxin is an
ADP-
ribosyltransferase
(Similar to cholera
toxin, diphtheria toxin,
and Pseudomonas
exotoxin A)

Virulence Gene Regulatory Networks


Global Regulation of Virulence in Bordetella pertussis

20
9/8/2019

Virulence Gene Regulatory Networks


Global Regulation of Virulence in Bordetella pertussis

Local damage is caused by a tracheal


cytotoxin, which kills ciliated cells
specifically and leads to their extrusion from
the epithelium as B. pertussis binds to and
multiplies on ciliated cells.

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
1. Down-regulation of Virulence Factors of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Salicylic acid

• Salicylic acid (SA) significantly


diminished P. aeruginosa's
ability to kill Caenorhabditis
elegans worms

• No effect on accumulation of
bacteria inside the worm’s gut,
suggesting that SA negatively
affected factors that influence
the virulence of P. aeruginosa

21
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
1. Down-regulation of Virulence Factors of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa by Salicylic acid.

• SA selectively repressed
transcription of exoproteins and
other virulence factors, while it had
no effect on expression of
housekeeping genes.

• In addition to its role as a signal


molecule in plant defense responses,
SA works as an anti-infective
compound by affecting the
physiology of P. aeruginosa and
ultimately attenuating its virulence.

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
2. Virulence control in group A Streptococcus
by a two-component gene regulatory
system

• Group A Streptococcus, the causative agent of


mild infections and life-threatening invasive
diseases.
• A two-component regulatory system,
designated covRS (cov, control of virulence;
csrRS) plays central role in growth and
pathogenesis
• One of 13 two-component signal-transducing
systems (TCS) encoded in GAS genomes

22
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
CovRS
• Regulates GAS gene expression in response to
stress in laboratory settings (39°C, a pH of 6,
or a high concentration of salt)
– Under these stress conditions, CovS inactivates CovR
and thus derepresses genes required for growth of the
bacteria
• Acts via repression
• Negatively controls expression of five proven or
putative virulence factors (capsule, cysteine
protease, streptokinase, streptolysin S, and
streptodornase)
• Required for biofilm formation
• Modulates the transcriptome during growth in
human blood

Other Systems involved in GAS


Virulence Regulation

Cole et al., 2011 Nature Rev Microbiol

23
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
2. Virulence control in group A Streptococcus by a two-
component gene regulatory system

• Using DNA microarrays and quantitative RT-


PCR, it was shown that CovR influences
transcription of 15% (n = 271) of all
chromosomal genes

• CovR also plays a central role in gene


regulatory networks by influencing
expression of genes encoding transcriptional
regulators, including other two-component
systems.

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
3. Regulation of Virulence by Environmental
Signals

The majority of group A streptococci (GAS,


Streptococcus pyogenes) are aggressive human
pathogens that must recognize and survive
within different environments during infection.

24
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
3. Regulation of Virulence by Environmental
Signals

• The M protein, fimbrial molecule found on the


surface of GAS, thought to play essential role in
establishment and progression of streptococcal
infections.

• Functions by preventing phagocytosis of the


bacteria by polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) and
allows bacterium to evade host immune response

• Transcription of the emm gene regulated by CO2

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
3. Regulation of Virulence by Environmental
Signals in GAS

• Increased osmolarity, low temperature, growth


with free exchange of gases, or the restricted
availability of iron resulted in decreased
transcription from the emm promoter

• Transcription of emm and scpA (and several


other virulence surface-associated molecules) in
GAS regulated by the two-component multiple
gene regulator, Mga, in response to CO2 levels

Infect Immun. 1995 Nov; 63(11): 4540–


4542

25
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
3. Regulation of Virulence by Environmental Signals

• The GAS CovRS homologs in group B streptococci,


Streptococcus mutans, and Enterococcus faecalis
have also been shown to regulate many virulence
genes and to be important for pathogenesis in
these organisms.

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
3. Regulation of Virulence by Environmental
Signals

• In Bacillus anthracis, transcription of the


genes encoding the virulence-associated
capsule and the anthrax tripartite toxin is
activated by increased external CO2 levels
and by high temperature.

• The activator AtxA (pXO1) is needed for


toxin and capsule synthesis, while AcpAB
protein (pXO2) is necessary for capsule
expression.

26
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
4. The AraC (arabinose) Family
Transcriptional Regulator – E. coli

• Negative auto-regulation
• Complex system for regulating intracellular levels

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
4. The AraC Family Transcriptional Regulator

• Six members of this family (Rv1317c [alkA],


Rv1395, Rv1931c, Rv3082c [virS], Rv3736, and
Rv3833) have been identified in the genome of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis by sequence similarity
to the defining DNA binding domain.

• The first of these, Rv1317c (alkA), has additional


domains conferring a role in the repair of alkylated
DNA, with the regulatory functions residing at the
N terminus.

27
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
4. The AraC Family Transcriptional Regulator

• Subsequently, Rv1395 has been shown to


regulate the expression of a cytochrome P450-
encoding gene transcribed divergently from it.

• Another member of this AraC family, Rv3082c


(virS), has been suggested to play a role in M.
tuberculosis pathogenesis on the basis of
sequence similarities and has also been shown to
regulate an operon transcribed divergently from
it.

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation

5. DNA Supercoiling
• A number of environmental stresses (such as
osmotic shock and anaerobiosis) have been
shown to induce changes in DNA
supercoiling.

• DNA supercoiling directly affects the


transcription of a specific subset of bacterial
genes, at least some of which (the outer-
membrane porins and type 1 fìmbriae) play a
part in bacterial virulence.

28
9/8/2019

Other
Systems
involved in
Virulence
Regulation

Examples: virR
gene of
Shigella
flexneri, and
invasin genes
of Salmonella
typhimurium

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation

6. DNA Methylation
• Plasmid-encoded fimbriae (Pef)
expressed by S. Typhimurium mediate
adhesion to mouse intestinal epithelium.

• The pef operon shares features with the E.


coli pyelonephritis-associated pilus
(pap) operon

29
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation

6. DNA Methylation
• These features include conserved DNA GATC
box sites in the upstream regulatory region as
well as homologues of the PapI and PapB
regulatory proteins.

• Unlike Pap fimbriae, which are expressed in a


variety of laboratory media, Pef fimbriae are
expressed only in acidic, rich broth under
standing culture conditions.

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
6. DNA Methylation
• Analysis of the DNA methylation states of pef
GATC sites indicated that, under acidic growth
conditions, which induced Pef production,
most GATC I sites were non-methylated,
whereas GATC II and GATC X were
predominantly methylated.

• The methylation protection at GATC I and


GATC II was dependent on Lrp and was
modulated by PefI.

30
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
6. DNA Methylation
• DNA adenine methylase (Ddam) mutants of
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium
contain reduced levels of FinP RNA encoded on
the virulence plasmid.

• Dam methylation appears to regulate finP


transcription, rather than FinP RNA stability or
turnover.

• The finP promoter includes canonical -10 and -


35 modules and depends on the δ70 factor.

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation

6. DNA Methylation
• Unexpectedly, a GATC site overlapping with
the -10 module is likewise dispensable for
Dam-mediated regulation.

• These observations indicate that Dam


methylation regulates finP transcription
indirectly and suggest the involvement of a
host factor(s) responsive to the Dam
methylation state of the cell.

31
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation

• Varying deficiencies in cell growth, antimicrobial resistance and


biofilm formation, alongside low-level increases in gene
expression (recA and papI), and adherence to HEK-293 and HTB-
9 mammalian cells were also detected as a factor of SOS
induction to result in increased mutability. Phenotypic
characteristics of parental strains were restored in dam
complement strains.

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation

32
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation

• Most of the genes involved in attaching-and-effacing lesion


formation are carried within a chromosomal pathogenicity island
called the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE)

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation
• Evaluation of
agrA and sarA
targeted small
RNA silencing of
virulence in
Staphylococcus
aureus in a
Caenorhabditis
elegans model

33
9/8/2019

Other Systems involved in Virulence


Regulation

• Figure 1. HC104A and HC106A inhibit DosRST reporter fluorescence. (a)


Chemical structures of HC104A and HC106A. HC104A (b) and HC106A (c)
inhibited DosR-driven GFP fluorescence signal in a dose-dependent manner, while
having minimal impact of Mtb growth. The EC50 values of fluorescence inhibition
for HC104A and HC106A are 9.8 µM and 2.5 µM, respectively.

L.3: Quorum Sensing

• It was once held that most bacteria function


only as individuals designed to compete with
one another and to multiply rapidly under
appropriate conditions.

• After all, dense cultures of bacteria can be


grown from a single cell.

• This concept has given way to the view that,


like other creatures, bacteria can
communicate with each other and form
communities that represent more than the
sum of the individuals.

34
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing

Some, Vibrio fischeri (Beijerinck 1889)/(Aliivibrio


fischeri; 2007) or Vibrio harveyi, can glow in the
dark.

Quorum Sensing
• Others, like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, form
biofilms on the surface of human organs, and
attack virulently those organs multiplying
with tremendous speed, making it practically
impossible for antibiotics to interfere.

What is quorum sensing?

35
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing
• Bacteria produce and release chemical signals -
autoinducers - in search of similar cells in their close
surroundings.
– Called "cell-cell communication"
• Other bacteria release the same autoinducers in response.

• One-cell organisms in effect become multi-cellular


organisms and can act together.

• The detection of a minimal threshold stimulatory


concentration of an autoinducer leads to an alteration in
gene expression.

Quorum Sensing

36
9/8/2019

Canonical bacterial quorum-sensing (QS)


circuits.

Steven T. Rutherford, and Bonnie L. Bassler Cold


Spring Harb Perspect Med 2012;2:a012427

©2012 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

Quorum Sensing

• These processes include symbiosis,


virulence, competence, conjugation,
antibiotic production, motility, sporulation,
and biofilm formation.

• In general, Gram-negative bacteria use


acylated homoserine lactones as
autoinducers, and Gram-positive bacteria
use processed oligo-peptides to
communicate.

37
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing
Gram Positive System
• Production of some antimicrobial peptides
(AMPs), so-called "bacteriocins", activated by
quorum sensing in several lactic acid bacteria
– Lactacin – against competitive bacteria
– Nicin and pediocin – against spoilage and
pathogenic bacteria

• Important for develop-


ment of genetic
competence (ability to
"pick up" DNA) or
virulence

Quorum Sensing
Gram Positive System
• Since the animal gut includes a HCD of micro-organisms
consisting mainly of Gram+ve bacteria, we think that a
significant part of these bacteria use quorum sensing
mechanisms involving peptide pheromones.

38
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing
Gram Positive System
Staphylococcus aureus Agr system

• S. aureus can cause skin and soft tissue


infections, as well as pneumonia,
bacteremia, and sepsis
• S. aureus is the leading cause of hospital-
related infections in the US
• Ability to cause disease depends on
expression of an array of adhesins, toxins,
and compounds that affect the immune
system

Quorum Sensing
Staphylococcus aureus Agr system

• QS regulates expression of virulence-


associated genes via the agr locus
• Includes
  a-toxin
  d-haemolysin
  rot (repressor of toxins)
Fibronectin-binding proteins
Protein A, Coagulase
–  secreted toxins (proteases,
lipase, superantigens, urease)

39
9/8/2019

THOMPSON AND BROWN (2014) PATHOGENS AND GLOBAL HEALTH

90

80

Percentage Frequency (%)


70

60

50
MRSA
40
MSSA
30

20

10

0
TSST LUKE-ED β-HAEMO γ-HAEMO γ-VAR
S. aureus Toxins

Frequency distribution of agr Frequency Distribution of toxins


alleles

Frequency
Distribution of
Staphylococcal
enterotoxin

Quorum Sensing
Staphylococcus aureus Agr system

• agr system inhibits biofilm formation


• Could be due to the fact that establishing
a biofilm community at LCD allows S.
aureus time to grow to HCD and, at that
point, it is optimally poised to secrete
virulence factors
• To facilitate its dispersal, S. aureus
terminates biofilm production and
decreases surface proteins and adhesins
at HCD

40
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing
Gram Negative System
The Aliivibrio fischeri LuxI/LuxR System

• LuxI is the protein responsible for


autoinducer production, and LuxR is the
protein necessary for detecting and
responding to autoinducer (acylated-
homoserine lactone).

Quorum Sensing
Gram Negative System
The Allivibrio fischeri LuxI/LuxR System:

41
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing
Gram Negative System

• Activation of the luxICDABE operon


establishes a positive feedback loop,
increasing the level of autoinducer
production (via luxI) and the amount of
light the bacterium emits (via luxCDABE).

• Conversely, the LuxR-autoinducer


complex inhibits the transcription of luxR,
which provides a compensatory
mechanism for the regulation of light
production.

Quorum Sensing
Gram Negative System
• In most described cases, acyl-HSL signals
are generated by the activity of a single
enzyme that uses as substrates S-
adenosylmethionine (SAM) and an
intermediate of fatty acid biosynthesis, acyl-
acyl carrier protein.

• Thus Pseudomonas aeruginosa RhlI primarily


catalyzes the synthesis of N-butyryl-HSL
(C4-HSL), and P. aeruginosa LasI directs the
synthesis of N-(3-oxododecanoyl)-HSL
(3OC12-HSL).

42
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing
Gram Negative System
• Quorum sensing was first discovered to
control the luminescence of Allivibrio fischeri,
a bacterium that forms a mutualistic light
organ symbiosis with certain marine animals.

• Acyl-HSL signaling is critical for virulence of


the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora and
for virulence of P. aeruginosa in mouse
models of lung and burn infections, in
invertebrates, and in plants.

Quorum Sensing
Gram Negative System
• Both of these systems, LasR-I and RhlR-I,
have linked R and I genes.

• It is estimated that about 4% of the roughly


6,000 P. aeruginosa genes are controlled by
quorum sensing.

• The autoinducers 3OC12-HSL and C4-HSL


bind to a regulatory protein (LasR or RhlR),
activating it to the form that stimulates gene
expression.

43
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing

Quorum Sensing
Gram Negative System
• LasI synthesizes autoinducers and more
activation of LasR, thus the bacterium
responds quickly by producing virulence
factors controlled by LasR.

• These include lasA and lasB, a gene that


encodes an alkaline protease (aprA), the
gene that encodes exotoxin A (toxA), and
two component genes for the export of these
exoproteins (xcpP, xcpR).

44
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing

Quorum Sensing
Gram Negative System
• rhlA and rhlB encode enzymes that synthesize rhamnolipid,
which maybe involved in cell damage.

• A LasR mutant strain could


colonize the lung, but it did not
achieve high densities and it
did not cause pneumonia,
bacteremia, or death.

• The mutant did not have a


growth defect under laboratory
conditions, it could invade the
lung and survive but it could
not cause disease.

45
9/8/2019

ASSESSMENT OF PATHOGENICITY USING


THE ROMAINE LETTUCE LEAF MODEL

Rhl+/Las+ Rhl-/Las+

Rhl+/Las- Rhl-/Las-

ASSESSMENT OF PATHOGENICITY USING


THE ROMAINE LETTUCE LEAF MODEL

 Isolates grouped as rhl-


/las+ and rhl+/las- showed
increased infection potential
due to severe maceration of
tissues as early as day 2

 Isolates grouped as rhl-/las- and rhl-/las+ showed


reduced infection potential since the more severe
effects were not observed until day 4.
 Of significance, isolates that were rhamnolipid
negative/elastase negative could still cause infection
in plants.

46
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing
References:

Bacterial Pathogenesis: A Molecular Approach. 2nd Edition by


Abigail A. Salyers and Dixie D. Whitt. ASM Press, Washington , D.C.

Mechanisms of Microbial Disease. 2nd Edition by Moselio


Schaechter, Gerald Medoff and Barry I. Eisenstein. Williams and
Wilkins, Balitmore.

Regulation of finP Transcription by DNA Adenine Methylation


in the Virulence Plasmid of Salmonella enterica.
Eva M. Camacho, Ana Serna, Cristina Madrid, Silvia Marques, Raul
Fernandez, Fernando de la Cruz, Antonio Juarez, and Josep
Casadesus. (2005) J Bact., 187, 5691–5699

Quorum Sensing
References:

Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing in Gram-negative


bacteria: A signaling mechanism involved in associations with
higher organisms.
Matthew R. Parsek and E. Peter Greenberg (2000). PNAS 97, 8789-
8793.

Regulation of Virulence by Environmental Signals in Group A


Streptococci: Influence of Osmolarity, Temperature, Gas
Exchange, and Iron Limitation on emm Transcription.
Kevin S. McIver, Andrew S. Heath, and June R. Scott
Infection and Immunity (1995) 63, 4540–4542

DNA methylation-dependent regulation of Pef expression in


Salmonella typhimurium.
Brad Nicholson and David Low (2000). Molecular Microbiology 35,
728.

47
9/8/2019

Quorum Sensing
References:

Virulence control in group A Streptococcus by a two-


component gene regulatory system: Global expression
profiling and in vivo infection modelling.
Morag R. Graham, Laura M. Smoot, Cristi A. Lux Migliaccio, Kimmo
Virtaneva, Daniel E. Sturdevant, Stephen F. Porcella, Michael J.
Federle, Gerald J. Adams, June R. Scott, and James M. Musser. Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(21): 13855–13860.

The AraC Family Transcriptional Regulator Rv1931c Plays a


Role in the Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Cristiane C. Frota, K. G. Papavinasasundaram, Elaine O. Davis, and
M. Joseph Colston. Infection and Immunity (2004), 72, 5483-5486

48

You might also like