Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0.4 Chapter 4 - Family Nursing Process
0.4 Chapter 4 - Family Nursing Process
Objectives:
o Assess with the individual and family one’s health status/competence.
o Formulate with the client a plan of care to address the health conditions, needs, problems, and
issues based on priorities.
o Implement safe and quality interventions with the client to address the health needs, problems,
and issues.
o Provide health education using selected planning models to targeted clientele (individuals and
families) in the community.
o Apply principles of partnership and collaboration to improve delivery of health services.
o Evaluate with the client the health status/competence.
3) Home Environment
i. Housing
a. Adequacy of living space
b. Sleeping arrangement
c. Presence of breeding or resting sites of vectors of diseases (e.g. mosquitoes, roaches,
flies, rodents, etc.)
d. Presence of accident hazard
35
level. Wellness potential is a nursing judgment on wellness state or condition based on client’s
performance, current competencies, or performance, clinical data or explicit expression of
desire to achieve a higher level of state or function in a specific area on health promotion and
maintenance. Examples of this are the following:
II. Presence of Health Threats - conditions that are conducive to disease and accident, or may
result to failure to maintain wellness or realize health potential. Examples of this are the
following:
A. Presence of risk factors of specific diseases (e.g. lifestyle diseases, metabolic syndrome)
B. Threat of cross infection from communicable disease case
C. Family size beyond what family resources can adequately provide
D. Accident hazards
1. Broken chairs
2. Pointed /sharp objects, poisons and medicines improperly kept
3. Fire hazards
4. Fall hazards
5. Others
E. Faulty/unhealthful nutritional/eating habits or feeding techniques/practices.
1. Inadequate food intake both in quality and quantity
2. Excessive intake of certain nutrients
3. Faulty eating habits
4. Ineffective breastfeeding
5. Faulty feeding techniques
F. Stress Provoking Factors.
1. Strained marital relationship
2. Strained parent-sibling relationship
3. Interpersonal conflicts between family members
4. Care-giving burden
G. Poor Home/Environmental Condition/Sanitation.
1. Inadequate living space
2. Lack of food storage facilities
3. Polluted water supply
4. Presence of breeding or resting sites of vectors of diseases
5. Improper garbage/refuse disposal
37
I. Menopause
J. Loss of job
K. Hospitalization of a family member
L. Death of a member
M. Resettlement in a new community
N. Illegitimacy
Second-Level Assessment
II. Inability to make decisions with respect to taking appropriate health action due to:
A. Failure to comprehend the nature/magnitude of the problem/condition
B. Low salience of the problem/condition
C. Feeling of confusion, helplessness and/or resignation brought about by perceive
magnitude/severity of the situation or problem, i.e. failure to breakdown problems into
manageable units of attack.
D. Lack of/inadequate knowledge/insight as to alternative courses of action open to them
E. Inability to decide which action to take from among a list of alternatives
F. Conflicting opinions among family members/significant others regarding action to take.
G. Lack of/inadequate knowledge of community resources for care
H. Fear of consequences of action, specifically:
1. Social consequences
2. Economic consequences
3. Physical consequences
4. Emotional/psychological consequences
I. Negative attitude towards the health condition or problem-by negative attitude is meant
one that interferes with rational decision-making.
J. Inaccessibility of appropriate resources for care, specifically:
1. Physical Inaccessibility
2. Costs constraints or economic/financial inaccessibility
K. Lack of trust/confidence in the health personnel/agency
L. Misconceptions or erroneous information about proposed course(s) of action
III. Inability to provide adequate nursing care to the sick, disabled, dependent or vulnerable/at
risk member of the family due to:
A. Lack of/inadequate knowledge about the disease/health condition (nature, severity,
complications, prognosis and management)
B. Lack of/inadequate knowledge about child development and care
C. Lack of/inadequate knowledge of the nature or extent of nursing care needed
D. Lack of the necessary facilities, equipment and supplies of care
39
IV. Inability to provide a home environment conducive to health maintenance and personal
development due to:
A. Inadequate family resources specifically:
1. Financial constraints/limited financial resources
2. Limited physical resources-e.g. lack of space to construct facility
B. Failure to see benefits (specifically long term ones) of investments in home environment
improvement
C. Lack of/inadequate knowledge of importance of hygiene and sanitation
D. Lack of/inadequate knowledge of preventive measures
E. Lack of skill in carrying out measures to improve home environment
F. Ineffective communication pattern within the family
G. Lack of supportive relationship among family members
H. Negative attitudes/philosophy in life which is not conducive to health maintenance and
personal development
I. Lack of/inadequate competencies in relating to each other for mutual growth and
maturation (e.g. reduced ability to meet the physical and psychological needs of other
members as a result of family’s preoccupation with current problem or condition.
1. Cost constrains
2. Physical inaccessibility
H. Lack of or inadequate family resources, specifically
1. Manpower resources, e.g. baby sitter
2. Financial resources, cost of medicines prescribe
I. Feeling of alienation to/lack of support from the community, e.g. stigma due to mental
illness, AIDS, etc.
J. Negative attitude/ philosophy in life which hinders effective/maximum utilization of
community resources for health care
The coping index is composed of a point on the scale and a justification statement. Coping is
rated from 1 (totally unable to manage this aspect of family care) to 5 (able to handle this aspect
of care without help from community resources). Check no problem if it is not relevant.
Level of Competence
0 - No Problem
1 - No Competence
3 - Moderate Competence
5 - Complete Competence
The justification consists of statements that explain why you have rated the family as you have
explained in observable facts. General considerations include:
1. It is the coping capacity and not the underlying problem is being rated.
2. It is the family and not the individual that is being rated.
with each other and determines patterns or reoccurring themes among the data, and then
compares these data and the patterns or reoccurring themes with norms and standards.
Socio – Economic and Cultural Characteristics
Home Environment
Family Health Status
Family Values and Health Practices
The end result of the second-level assessment is a set of family nursing problems for each health
condition or problem.
A wellness condition is a nursing judgment related with a client’s capability for wellness. A
health condition or problem is a situation which interferes with the promotion and/or maintenance of
health and recovery from illness or injury. A wellness state or health condition/problem becomes a
nursing problem when it is stated as the family’s failure to perform adequately specific health tasks to
enhance the wellness state or manage the health problem. This is called the nursing diagnosis in family
nursing practice.
Definition
A family nursing care plan is the blueprint of the care that the nurse designs to systematically
minimize or eliminate the identified health and family nursing problems through explicitly
formulated outcomes of care (goals and objectives) and deliberately chosen set of interventions,
resources and evaluation criteria, standards, methods, and tools.
Features
The definition points to specific features of a nursing care plan. These characteristics are based on
the concept of planning as a process.
1. The nursing care plan focuses on actions which are designed to solve or minimize existing
problem. The plan is a blueprint for action. The core of the plan are the approaches, strategies,
activities, methods, and materials which the nurse hopes will improve the problem situation.
2. The nursing care plan is a product of a deliberate systematic process. The planning process is
characterized by logical analyses of data that are put together to arrive at rational decisions. The
interventions the nurse decides to implement are chosen from among alternatives after careful
analysis and weighing of available options.
3. The nursing care plan, as with all other plans, relates to the future. It utilizes events in the
past and what is happening in the present to determine patterns. It also projects the future
scenario if the current situation is not corrected.
4. The nursing care plan is based upon identified health and nursing problems. The problems are
starting points for the plan, and foci of the objectives of care and intervention measures.
5. The nursing care plan is a means to an end, not an end in itself. The goal in planning is to
deliver the most appropriate care to a client by eliminating barriers to family health
development.
6. Nursing care planning is a continuous process, not a one-shot-deal. The results of the
evaluation of the plan’s effectiveness trigger another cycle of the planning process until the
health and nursing problems are eliminated.
42
1. Priority Setting
After the assessment phase, the nurse may realize that the family is faced with a number of
health and nursing problems which cannot be taken up all at the same time considering the
available resources of both the family and the nurse. Considering the situation, she can rank the
identified health conditions/problems into priorities. Bailon and Maglaya (1990) devised a tool
called Scale for Ranking Health Conditions and Problems According to Priorities. This tool aims to
objectivize priority setting. There are four criteria for determining priorities among health
condition/s or problems. These include:
Nature of the condition or problem presented – categorized into wellness state/potential,
health threat, health deficit and foreseeable crisis:
Modifiability of the condition or problem – refers to the probability of success in enhancing
the wellness state, improving the condition, minimizing, alleviating or totally eradicating the
problem through intervention;
Preventive Potential – refers to the nature and magnitude of future problems that can be
minimized or totally prevented if intervention is done on the condition or problem under
consideration;
Salience – refers to the family’s perception and evaluation of the condition or problem in
terms of seriousness and urgency of attention needed or family readiness.
The experienced nurse practitioner can determine priorities among health condition or
problems utilizing her judgment on all these four criteria without necessarily going through the
process of scoring. The arithmetic computations utilized in the scale can, however, guide the
students or new practitioners who still need to gain the skill in deciding which factors have more
weight over the others. The computations help systematize priority setting by determining a
specific score for each problem on the list. The nurse considers several factors in order to be
objective in the decision-making process when setting priorities.
43
A goal is a general statement of the condition or state to be brought about by specific courses of
action. A cardinal principle in goal setting states that goals must be set jointly with the family. This
ensures the family’s commitment to the realization. Basic to the establishment of mutually
accepted goals is the family’s recognition and acceptance of existing health needs and problems.
The nurse must ascertain the family’s knowledge and acceptance of the problem as well as the
desire to take actions to resolve them. This is done during the assessment phase.
Goals set by the nurse and the family should be realistic or attainable. They should, therefore,
be set at reasonable levels. Too high goals and their consequent failure frustrate both the family
and the nurse. A clear definition of the problem situation and an accurate assessment of available
resources facilitate the setting of realistic goals. Both of these are functions of the depth and
breadth of the assessment process.
Goals, like objectives, are best stated in terms of client outcomes, whether at the individual,
family or community levels. Objectives, in contrast to goals, refer to more specific statements of the
desired results or outcomes of care. They specify the criteria by which the degree of effectiveness
of care are to be measured. Goals tell where the family is going; objectives are the milestones to
reach the destination.
Objectives stated as outcomes of care in family health nursing practice specify physical,
psychosocial states or family behavior. Examples are given below:
After nursing intervention, the malnourished preschool members of the family will increase
their weights by at least one pound per month.
After nursing intervention, the family will be able to:
a. Feed the mentally retarded child according to prescribed quantity and quality of food.
b. Teach the mentally retarded child simple skills related to the activities of daily living.
c. Apply measures taught to prevent infection in the mentally retarded member.
44
The next step in developing the family nursing care plan is formulating the intervention plan.
This involves selection of appropriate nursing interventions based on the formulated goals and
objectives. In selecting the nursing interventions, the nurse decides on appropriate nursing actions
among a set of alternatives, specifying the most effective or efficient method of nurse-family
contact and the resources needed. Some examples of nurse-family contact include the home visit,
clinic conference, visit in the workplace, school visit, telephone call, group approach (like health
classes), and the use of mail. The resources which include material (e.g., supplies, equipment,
teaching aids/kits, visual materials, handouts, charts, etc.) or human (e.g., other health team
members, development workers, community leaders) must be specified in the plan to ensure that
necessary preparations, coordination and collaboration are done before the implementation phase.
The public health bag is an essential and indispensable equipment of a public health
nurse which she/he has to carry along during her home visits. It contains basic medications and
articles which are necessary for giving care.
1. Upon arrival at the patient’s home, place the bag on the table To protect the bag from getting
lined with a clean paper. The clean side must be out and the contaminated
folded part, touching the table.
2. Ask for a basin of water or a glass of drinking water if tap To be used for hand washing
water is not available.
46
3. Open the bag and take out the towel and soap. To prepare for hand washing
4. Wash hands using soap and water. Wipe to dry. To prevent infection from the care
provider to the client
5. Take out the apron from the bag and put it on with the right To protect the nurse’s uniform
side out.
6. Put out all the necessary articles needed for the specific care. To have them readily accessible
7. Close the bag and put it in one corner of the working area. To prevent contamination
8. Proceed in performing the necessary nursing care and To give comfort and security and
treatment. hasten recovery
9. After giving the treatment, clean all things that were used To protect the caregiver and prevent
and perform hand washing. infection
10. Open the bag and return all things that were used in their
proper places after cleaning them.
11. Remove apron, folding it away from the person, the soiled
side in and the clean side out. Place it in the bag.
12. Fold the lining, place it inside the bag and close the bag.
13. Take the record and have a talk with the Mother. Write For reference in the next visit
down all the necessary data that were gathered, observations,
nursing care and treatment rendered. Give instructions for care
of patients in the absence of the nurse.
14. Make appointment for the next visit (either home or clinic) For follow-up care
taking note of the date and time.
Pre-consultation conference
A pre-clinic lecture is usually conducted prior to the admission of patients, which is one
way of providing health education.
III. Triaging
1. Manage program-based cases.
(Certain programs of the DOH like the IMCI utilize an acceptable decision to which the
nurse has to follow in the management of a simple case).
Example – for control of diarrheal diseases (CDD), assess if the child has diarrhea
- If he has, for how long – is there a blood in the stool?
- Assess the child’s general condition – sleepy, difficult to awaken, restless and
irritable
- Observe for sunken eyes
- Offer fluid. Is he able to drink or is he drinking regularly, thirsty
- Pinch skin of the abdomen – does it go back very slowly?
2. Refer all non-program based cases to the physician. For all other cases which has no
potential danger, treatment/management is initiated by the nurse and she decides to
do her own nursing diagnosis and then refer to the physician for medical management.
3. Provide first-aid treatment to emergency cases and refer when necessary to the next
level care.
VII. Prescription/Dispensing
1. Give proper instructions on drug intake
2. To assess the living condition of the patient and his family and their health practices in
order to provide the appropriate health teaching
3. To give health teachings regarding the prevention and control of diseases
4. To establish close relationship between the health agencies and the public for the
promotion of health
5. To make use of the inter-referral system and to promote the utilization of community
services.
Utilization of health services and the poor: deconstructing wealth-based differences in facility-
based delivery in the Philippines
Andrew Hodge, Sonja Firth, Raoul Bermejo, III, Willibald Zeck, and Eliana Jimenez-Soto
Abstract
Background
Despite achieving some success, wealth-related disparities in the utilization of maternal and child
health services persist in the Philippines. The aim of this study is to decompose the principal factors
driving the wealth-based utilization gap.
Methods
Using national representative data from the 2013 Philippines Demographic and Health Survey, we
examine the extent overall differences in the utilization of maternal health services can be explained
by observable factors. We apply nonlinear Blinder-Oaxaca-type decomposition methods to quantify
the effect of differences in measurable characteristics on the wealth-based coverage gap in facility-
based delivery.
Results
The mean coverage of facility-based deliveries was respectively 41.1 % and 74.6 % for poor and non-
poor households. Between 67 and 69 % of the wealth-based coverage gap was explained by
differences in observed characteristics. After controlling for factors characterizing the socioeconomic
status of the household (i.e. the mothers’ and her partners’ education and occupation), the birth
order of the child was the major factor contributing to the disparity. Mothers’ religion and the
subjective distance to the health facility were also noteworthy.
Conclusions
This study has found moderate wealth-based disparities in the utilization of institutional delivery in
the Philippines. The results confirm the importance of recent efforts made by the Philippine
government to implement equitable, pro-poor focused health programs in the most deprived
geographic areas of the country. The importance of addressing the social determinants of health,
particularly education, as well as developing and implementing effective strategies to encourage
institutional delivery for higher order births, should be prioritized.
50
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is defined as the integration of best research evidence, clinical
expertise, and patient values. The aim of using evidence-to-guide practice is to support effective
practice by using evidence-based patient management strategies which are known to result in best
patient care. Thus, the concepts of EBP, which include formulating a focused clinical question,
searching and accessing the literature to identify the best research evidence, assessing the validity of
the evidence (critical appraisal), and applying the evidence to actual patient scenarios, have been
introduced and evaluated in the training of health professionals, particularly among medical doctors
in developed countries.
Janine Margarita Dizon, Ryan Joseph Dizon, Jocel Regino, and Alberto Gabriel
Abstract
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is integral in the health care system whether in developed or
developing countries. Thus, all health professionals need to be trained in EBP. An EBP training
program was conducted to health professionals in a developing country, the Philippines. The health
professionals (medical doctors and allied health professionals [physical therapists and occupational
therapists]) were working in hospitals in Manila, Philippines. The program aimed to build capacity in
EBP in terms of knowledge and skills. The EBP training program was conducted as a 1-day face-to-
face training. Pre- and post-test measures of EBP knowledge and skills were taken prior to and
immediately after the 1-day training, using the Fresno test of evidence-based medicine for the
medical doctors and the Adapted Fresno test for the allied health professionals. The EBP training
program resulted in significant improvements in knowledge and skills for both the medical doctors
(change in pre- and post-Fresno test measures, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.6–23.5; P≤0.05) and
the allied health professionals (change in pre- and post-Adapted Fresno test measures, 95% CI: 32.7–
38.5; P≤0.05). The EBP training conducted amongst the health professionals is an effective and tested
undertaking in introducing EBP in developing countries such as the Philippines.
On large rural health units in cities with established structure, the hierarchy is seen below:
The Rural Health Physician answers to the policies and health strategies set by the City Health
Officer. The Kagawad or Councilor on Health is on his/her political side. This person answers to the
Barangay Captain and is the link to providing resources in the barangay level to the health center.
Note that in the city level, there is also a Kagawad/Councilor on Health, which is the advisor on
health for the mayor.
On the health implementation side inside the barangay health unit, the hierarchy is as follows:
The Rural Health Nurse, usually one, has a higher command responsibility than the midwives.
This is because they have knowledge of every aspect in the day-to-day business of the health center.
The Rural Health Midwifes, usually more than one, have the next degree of responsibility. It is
because they are specialized to specific tasks inside the health center.
The Barangay Health Workers are the lowest group but are not paid through the city health
officer. Some are volunteers with only indemnity provided by the local government. Since the
indemnity and its amount is dictated by the Councilor's influence on the barangay budget, they
answer to the Kagawad/Councilor on Health. However, their service is to the health center, where
they do mostly clerical work.
The structure expands horizontally in the left side. If the rural health unit serves 3 barangays,
the rural health physician answers to 3 kagawads/councilors on health.
Additional Services
Should a barangay have budget for a medical technologist or a dentist, they have the same pay-
grade and command responsibility as the rural health nurse and the structure expands horizontally to
the right. Additional Barangay Health Workers are also found below them to serve their needs.
Local governments are political units composed of provinces, cities, municipalities and
barangays. They have long been existing with their own legislative bodies which are endowed with
specific powers as defined in the Revised Administrative Code and individual local government unit
(LGU) charters. These local legislative bodies were then called provincial boards in the case of
provinces, city councils in cities and municipal councils in municipalities. These local legislative bodies
were vested with the power to determine the number of employees that each office should have and
to fix their salary rates as agreed upon by the majority. In exercising such power, however, there
were no specific guidelines nor definite standards used in the creation of positions and the fixing of
salaries. Position titles were not descriptive nor reflective of the duties and responsibilities of the
positions and salaries were fixed arbitrarily. For local officials, however, laws such as Republic Act
(RA) No. 268 as amended, and RA No. 4477 were passed by Congress fixing the salaries of municipal,
provincial and city officials. These salary laws created a wide gap between the salaries of rank-and-
file employees and the officials.
3. Government Organizations
a) DSWD
The Philippines' Department of Social Welfare and Development (Filipino: Kagawaran ng
Kagalingan at Pagpapaunlad Panlipunan, abbreviated as DSWD) is the executive department of
the Philippine Government responsible for the protection of the social welfare of rights of
Filipinos and to promote social development.
52
History
In 1915, the Public Welfare Board (PWB) was created and was tasked to study,
coordinate and regulate all government and private entities engaged in social services. In 1921,
the PWB was abolished and replaced by the Bureau of Public Welfare under the Department of
Public Instruction.
On November 1, 1939, Commonwealth Act No. 439 created the Department of Health
and Public Welfare and in 1941, the Bureau of Public Welfare officially became a part of the
Department of Health and Public Welfare. In addition to coordinating services of all public and
private social welfare institutions, the Bureau also managed all public child-caring institutions
and the provision of child welfare services.
In 1947, President Manuel Roxas abolished the Bureau of Public Welfare and created
the Social Welfare Commission, under the Office of the President, in its place.
In 1968, Republic Act 5416, known as the Social Welfare Act of 1968, created the
Department of Social Welfare, placing it under the executive branch of government. In 1976, the
Department of Social Welfare was renamed Department of Social Services and Development
(DSSD) through Presidential Decree No. 994. This was signed into law by President Ferdinand E.
Marcos and gave the department an accurate institutional identity. On June 2, 1978, the DSSD
was renamed Ministry of Social Services and Development (MSSD) in line with the change in the
form of government.
In 1987, the MSSD was reorganized and renamed Department of Social Welfare and
Development (DSWD) through Executive Or der 123, which was signed by President Corazon C.
Aquino. Executive Order No. 292, also known as the Revised Administration Code of 1987,
established the name, organizational structure and functional areas of responsibility of DSWD
and further defined its statutory authority. In 1991, the passage of Republic Act No. 7160
otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991 effected the devolution of DSWD basic
services to local government units.
History
In 1958, PIN was reorganized into the Food and Nutrition Research Center (FNRC) under
the Science and Development Board.
54
In 1960, the National Coordinating Council on Food and Nutrition (NCCFN), a loose
organization of government and nongovernment agencies and organizations involved in
nutrition and related projects, was organized.
In 1971, Executive Order No. 285 was promulgated, mandating the National Food and
Agriculture Council (NFAC) to coordinate nutrition programs in addition to coordinating national
food programs, thus, superseding the NCCFN.
In 1974, Presidential Decree No. 491 (Nutrition Act of the Philippines, June 24, 1974),
which created the National Nutrition Council (NNC) as the highest policy-making and
coordinating body on nutrition, was promulgated.
In 1987, Executive Order No. 234 (Reorganization Act of NNC, July 22, 1987) was
promulgated, reaffirming the need for an intersectoral national policy-making and coordinating
body on nutrition. It expanded the membership of the NNC to include the Departments of
Budget and Management (DBM), Labor and Employment (DOLE), Trade and Industry (DTI), and
National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). The Department of Social Welfare and
Development was named chair of the NNC Governing Board.
In 1988, Administrative Order No. 88 named the Department of Agriculture as the NNC
Chair of the NNC Governing Board.
In 1995, Republic Act No. 8172, An Act Promoting Salt Iodization Nationwide, designated
the NNC together with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and a
representative each from the medical profession and the salt industry, as the Salt Iodization
Advisory Board (SIAB). The SIAB is the policy-making body and coordinating body for the salt
iodization program.
In 2000, Republic Act No. 8976, Food Fortification Act of 2000, designated the NNC as
advisory body on food fortification. As such, the NNC shall set policies on food fortification, i.e.
what foods to be fortified with what micronutrient.
In 2005, Executive Order No. 472 named the Department of Health as the chair of the
NNC, with the DA and DILG as vice-chairs. It also called the NNC to re-orient its operations to be
more client-oriented and to prioritize addressing hunger and malnutrition, and authorized NNC
to generate and mobilize resources.
c) Population Commission
History
1967 -Seventeen heads of state including the Philippine President signed the United
Nations Declaration on Population which stressed: The Population problem must be recognized
as a principal element in long-range planning, if governments are to achieve their economic
goals and fulfill the aspirations of their people.
1970-The Philippine Population Program was officially launched through the Executive
Order No. 233. The Commission on Population (POPCOM) was mandated to serve as the central
coordinating and policy making body of the government in the field of population.
55
1971-Republic Act 6365, known as the Population Act of the Philippines was enacted by
Congress.
1986-Executive Order No. 123 attached POPCOM to the Department of Social Welfare
and Development (DSWD), as the planning and coordinating agency.
1987-Policy statement under the Aquino Administration was issued by the POPCOM
Board which states: "the ultimate goal of the Population Program is the improvement of the
quality of human life in a just and humane society... The achievement of this goal requires a
recognition of the close interrelationships among population, resources and environmental
factors."
1990-Executive Order No. 408, was issued placing POPCOM under the Office of the
President in order to "facilitate coordination of policies and programs relative to population."
1991-Executive Order No. 476 was issued making POPCOM an attached agency of the
National Economic and Development Authority.
2003-On March 24, 2003, President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo issued Executive Order
No. 188 attaching POPCOM to the Department of Health.
Commonly referred to as NGOs, are usually non-profit that are active in humanitarian,
educational, health care, public policy, social, human rights, environmental, and other areas to
effect changes. They are a subgroup of all organizations founded by citizens, which include clubs
and other associations that provide services, benefits, and premises only to members.
Sometimes the term is used as a synonym of "civil society organization" to refer to any
association founded by citizens. Task-oriented and driven by people with a common interest,
NGOs perform a variety of service and humanitarian functions, bring citizen concerns to
Governments, advocate and monitor policies and encourage political participation through
provision of information.
NGOs are usually funded by donations, but some avoid formal funding altogether and
are run primarily by volunteers. NGOs are highly diverse groups of organizations engaged in a
wide range of activities, and take different forms in different parts of the world. Some may have
charitable status, while others may be registered for tax exemption based on recognition of
social purposes. Others may be fronts for political, religious, or other interests. Since the end of
World War II, NGOs have had an increasing role in international development, particularly in the
fields of humanitarian assistance and poverty alleviation.
By orientation
Charitable orientation often involves a top-down effort with little participation or input
by beneficiaries. It includes NGOs with activities directed toward meeting the needs of
the disadvantaged people groups.
Service orientation includes NGOs with activities such as the provision of health, family
planning or education services in which the programme is designed by the NGO and
people are expected to participate in its I mplementation and in receiving the service.
Participatory orientation is characterized by self-help projects where local people are
involved particularly in the implementation of a project by contributing cash, tools, land,
materials, labour etc. In the classical community development project, participation
begins with the need definition and continues into the planning and implementation
stages.
Empowering orientation aims to help poor people develop a clearer understanding of
the social, political and economic factors affecting their lives, and to strengthen their
awareness of their own potential power to control their lives. There is maximum
involvement of the beneficiaries with NGOs acting as facilitators.
By level of operation
Community-based organizations (CBOs) arise out of people's own initiatives. They can
be responsible for raising the consciousness of the urban poor, helping them to
understand their rights in accessing needed services, and providing such services.
City-wide organizations include organizations such as chambers of commerce and
industry, coalitions of business, ethnic or educational groups, and associations of
community organizations.
State NGOs include state-level organizations, associations and groups. Some state NGOs
also work under the guidance of National and International NGOs.
National NGOs include national organizations such as the YMCA, Rotary, professional
associations and similar groups.
International NGOs range from secular agencies such as Save the Children, to religiously
motivated groups. They can be responsible for funding local NGOs, institutions and
projects and implementing projects.
57
c) School Organizations
School organizations are created in schools to arrange the resources of time, space and
resources for the benefit of the faculty and students. Some examples are organizations
in student leadership and organizations in specific fields or subject.
Evaluation phase of the nursing process is a planned, ongoing, purposeful activity in which the
nurse and the client-partner determine the client’s progress toward achievement of goals and
outcomes. It also involves examining the other steps of the nursing process. Evaluation is an
important aspect of the nursing process because conclusions drawn from the evaluation determine
whether the nursing interventions should be terminated, continued or changed/ modified.
Evaluation is continuous. Evaluation done while or immediately after implementing a nursing
intervention enables the nurse and client-partner to make on- the- spot modifications in an
intervention.
The evaluation in the care of individuals focuses on: quality of life, functional status, patient
satisfaction, compliance measures, and impact of educational interventions. These are the broad
areas contained in the objectives of nursing care. In family health nursing, the nurse determines the
extent to which the family could perform its health tasks to maintain wellness or to address specific
health threats, health deficits, foreseeable crisis/ stress points.
In evaluating programs, the evaluator looks into the inputs, processes and/or outcomes. Inputs
are the important resources the program cannot do without (e.g., Iron and Vitamin A for a nutrition
program and vaccines for an immunization program). Processes are important activities of the
58
program. The outcomes of a program are outputs, effects and impact. Outputs are the specific
products or services which an activity is expected to produce from its inputs to achieve its objectives.
Effects are the results of the use of project outputs. Impact is the outcome of program effects and is
an expression of broader, long-range program objectives.