.

~ ot proposition-II
JnO

Rajat Aggarwal, aged 65, 1s .. 'th

dabad where he Ii ves W1
. . the ow ner of
.. two te fl •us
e [l'1J in Alu na
C Manager o f on e o f the
his wife and a son~ Karttk Aggarwal. V IJay Kaul xis1th •
supervisor- um
mills whereas Kart1'k Aggarwal 1s ·
the e h f the mi
.
lls.
M 13
·
2022, RaJat Aggarwal told Kart1k •
Ex ecu tive Ch • nna n of bot O
·
On
• h
ay '
ai
that he is planning to purchase some land to estabhs a new
textile mill on the outskirts of Ahmadab . V"
ad city which he again wants him to ma
Kaul. He told him that the market val nage witb iJa~
ue of these acres of }and is 50 l~cs of
of June, 2022, Rajat Aggarwal asked 5 _Rupees. On 2~k
Vijay whether he is interested to sell his
Aggarwal for Rs. 50 lac s for the establ l~ d ~o Ka rt
ishment of a new factory in which he aga
manager which was refused by Vijay in will be ~e
Kaul. From October onwards, there wa
in the salary of employees; however, s a 5 percent .hike
Vijay got a pay hike of2 0 percent and now
Rs. 80,000 per month . On 12th of Decem be~?g pai d as
ber, 2022, Rajat Aggarwal again ask~d
his land to him at 50 lacs of Rupees. Vij VtJay to sell
ay said him that he will tell after sometim
e.
st
On 1 January, 2023, Vijay was given
an accommodation by Rajat near the mil
Vijay shifted wit h his family in the hou l he worked in.
se. Rajat did not demand any rents and
not bother to ask anything in this regard Vijay also did
.
On 20 th February 202 3, Rajat came to the
house ofVijay and told him that he offere
the house on his name which was for 50 d to transfer
lacs of rupees in lieu of him being transfe
to Ka rtik . Vijay agreed to do it and told rring his land
Rajat that the land is being held by her s~s
property' s income till she remains unm ter to use the
arried under a written deed from her fath
the remainder interest which he will er and he has
transfer to Rajat after she gets married. Sis
th
on 30 August, 2023 . On September ter gets married
10, 2023 when asked to proceed with
refused to execute transfer deed. Raj at the transfer, Vijay
plead~d in the Court for the spe cif ic
contract as Vijay had exercised the opt per for ma nce of the
ion under section 35 Of the Transfer of
Argue for the parties. Property Act.

I q I3 I q I 5 °T J 71 Ict I Gf , ·I CJ 2 J
J
1 1

I '11 ½) I q 16I I Cf I g/ , Cf J._ 0,, I 9 ?- ')...} ' CJ ')..

½J