Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Why Do Farmers Commit Suicide
Why Do Farmers Commit Suicide
T
he summer of 2004 was an unprecedented one for rural there had been no attempt – either by the English language press
Andhra Pradesh, even by the dubious standards estab- or the local media – to collate and analyse the information at
lished in the last two decades when the number of suicides a broader level to highlight the issues at stake.
by peasants had risen alarmingly. In a short span of less than However, the most plausible reason for the spate of suicides
two months, between May and July 2004, more than 400 peasants appears to be related to the fact that farmers were at that time
in the state committed suicide. Although peasant suicides have engaged in the task of planning their next crop. May and June
repeatedly occurred in the state in the past, the significance of are months when they prepare for sowing the kharif crop in late
this round of deaths lay in the fact that they were reported from June and July, when the monsoon arrives in most parts of the
every single district in the state, barring Hyderabad. state. Those sympathetic to the plight of the farmers argued that
Blaming “drought”, the favourite explanation of do-nothing small and marginal farmers across the state had reached the end
politicians, simply failed to explain the tragic phenomenon. The of the road. Unable to clear their existing loans or to get fresh
fact that suicides were reported literally from every corner of loans for the next season, and seeing no hope on the horizon
the state (Table 1), in particular, from even the better irrigated they took their lives, they say.
districts, exposed the argument that the scarcity of water, depicted What explains the phenomenon of a sharp increase in the
in a vague and generally deceptive sense, was responsible for incidence of suicide among the peasantry? The consensus among
farmers committing suicide. Instead, the stunning sweep of death psychiatrists and social scientists who have explored the phe-
across the state brought to the fore all that is wrong in the lives nomenon is that a substantial “dislocation” of livelihoods drives
of the peasantry. a community to despair and eventually suicide. Although the
Death hit farmers in varying agro-climatic zones. Unlike the phenomenon of suicide is a deeply personal and individual act,
rounds of suicides in 1987-88, 1997-98 and 2000, when peasants suicidal behaviour is determined by a confluence of factors. These
growing particular crops such as tobacco, cotton, chillies and are basically in two domains. One, the internal domain, relates
groundnut died, in 2004 death stalked everywhere. No crop was to factors which operate at the level of the individual. The other
exempted and no section of the small peasantry appeared insu- is external, which suggests that larger social processes determine
lated. The overwhelming proportion of the death toll was among suicidal behaviour. It places emphasis on broader society-level
small and marginal farmers and tenant cultivators, who had no changes, as being responsible for deaths by suicide. The reasoning
claim on the land they cultivated and who paid exorbitant rents is that individuals, unable to cope with the social churn in which
to landlords. they find themselves, resort to suicide. Of course, this is accen-
What explains the unprecedented number of suicides in such tuated when such a churn is also accompanied by widespread
a short duration? Several theories floated in Hyderabad. The economic distress.
theory popular among sections of bureaucrats, politicians and The evolution of the modern understanding of suicides and
the intelligentsia was that the peasants committed suicide because suicidal behaviour has been to marry the externalised and the
of the assistance package announced on the eve of elections by internalised views. Diego De Leo, psychiatrist and former presi-
the then chief minister N Chandrababu Naidu, who hitherto dent of the International Association for Suicide Prevention
steadfastly clung to the notion that a relief package for victims (IASP), explains that this understanding has come a long way
would spur more farmers to their death. On June 2, 2004 the from the early 19th century view that equated suicidal behaviour
previous chief minister remarked that the “unusual spurt” in the with insanity. Two concomitant revolutions in the late 19th
number of suicides after Rajasekhara Reddy assumed office was century – one in the field of sociology, associated with Emile
because of the package. Durkheim (1951), and the other, the psychoanalytical movement
Another explanation was that it was simply because the media, led by Sigmund Freud, have been synthesised in the modern view
particularly the Telugu language press, was reporting such deaths of suicide and suicidal behaviour.
in a much more systematic manner than before. Some Telugu The phenomenon of suicide is therefore widely regarded to
papers listed the number of suicides in their district editions. be a result of individuals’ inability to cope with sudden and
Media observers pointed out that the coverage by the Telugu cataclysmic changes in socio-economic conditions. It is not
media was much better when compared to earlier rounds of such without significance that the highest suicide rates are those
deaths. In fact, observers noted that even the English dailies prevailing in the countries of the erstwhile Soviet Union, where
published from state reported the deaths in a more systematic calamitous changes in living conditions have occurred in the last
fashion than in the past. However, media critics also noted that decade and more.
Crops North Coastal Andhra South Coastal Andhra Rayalaseema South Telangana North Telangana Total State
1958 1998 1958 1998 1958 1998 1958 1998 1958 1998 1958 1998
Foodgrains 66.90 54.40 72.10 65.40 44.40 23.60 64.40 62.50 74.20 60.60 73.10 53.20
Groundnut 7.10 9.50 3.60 1.80 20.30 48.30 10.50 9.50 8.00 5.30 10.50 15.30
Oilseeds 11.30 12.90 6.30 3.70 21.40 56.30 19.50 20.30 15.10 10.80 15.30 20.80
Cotton 0.20 0.70 0.80 7.00 7.90 5.20 0.40 8.20 4.00 17.60 3.10 8.20
Others 21.60 32.00 20.80 23.90 26.30 14.90 15.50 9.00 6.70 11.00 11.60 17.80