The CARS model outlines a three move structure for establishing a research space in academic writing. Move 1 establishes the territory by describing the research problem and reviewing previous literature. Move 2 establishes a niche by identifying gaps or issues in previous research. Move 3 occupies the niche by outlining how the current study will address these gaps and contribute to knowledge. The model provides descriptions and examples of the typical language and steps used in each move.
The CARS model outlines a three move structure for establishing a research space in academic writing. Move 1 establishes the territory by describing the research problem and reviewing previous literature. Move 2 establishes a niche by identifying gaps or issues in previous research. Move 3 occupies the niche by outlining how the current study will address these gaps and contribute to knowledge. The model provides descriptions and examples of the typical language and steps used in each move.
The CARS model outlines a three move structure for establishing a research space in academic writing. Move 1 establishes the territory by describing the research problem and reviewing previous literature. Move 2 establishes a niche by identifying gaps or issues in previous research. Move 3 occupies the niche by outlining how the current study will address these gaps and contribute to knowledge. The model provides descriptions and examples of the typical language and steps used in each move.
The Create a Research Space (CARS) model (Swales, 1990)
Move 1 Descriptions Steps Writing Action Language
Establishing a Background 1. Claiming Describing the E.g., “The study territory (the information on the importance of, research of … has situation) issue/problem to problem and become a be discussed AND/OR providing significant evidence to aspect of …” support why the topic is important to study. 2. Making topic Providing E.g., “There are generalisations statements many situations about the where …” AND/OR current state of knowledge, consensus, practice or description of phenomena 3. Reviewing items Synthesising E.g., “As Borg et. of previous prior research al (2021) research that further found…” supports the need to study the research problem Move 2 Descriptions Steps Writing Action Language Establishing a Identification of 1a. Counter-claiming Introduce an E.g., “Emphasis niche (the issue/problem area opposing has been on … problem) to be discussed OR viewpoint or with scant from the perspective to attention given perspective of the identify a gap in to …” author, challenging prior research or questioning that the writer existing claims of believes has knowledge weakened or undermined the prevailing argument 1b. Indicating a gap Developing the E.g., “This OR research dilemma has problem around been a gap or complicated by understudied dearth of valid area of research data about …” 1c. Question-raising Presenting key E.g. “Despite OR questions about prior the observations of consequences of voter behaviour gaps in prior in local research that will elections, it be addressed in remains unclear this study why…” 1d Continuing a Extending prior Connecting tradition research to terminology expand upon or (e.g., “hence”, clarify a research “therefore”, problem. “consequently”), language that indicates a need (e.g., “Consequently these factors need to be examined in more detail…”) Move 3 Descriptions Steps Writing Action Language Occupying the 1. Stating how 1a. Outlining Answering the Clear niche (the the current purposes “So what?” explanations of solution) study will question objectives. contribute to OR knowledge or new 1b. Announcing understanding present research Describing study and purpose in terms 2. Describing the of intended organisational accomplishments structure of the paper 2. Announcing Summarising key E.g., “The principal findings findings findings indicate a need for …”, “The research suggests four approaches to …” 3. Indicating article Stating how the E.g., “This structure remaining paper review is will be organised organised as follows:”
The Fog Island Argument: Conversations About the Assessment of Arguments in Design and a General Education Course of Studies in Design, Planning, and Policy-Making