Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3rd Part Affidavit 20-04-2023
3rd Part Affidavit 20-04-2023
3rd Part Affidavit 20-04-2023
In
Crime.
No. 629 of 2020
Between:-
Sukanya Kapuria W/o Abhijit Kapuria
Aged About 40 Years, Occ: Private employed
R/o Plot No. 27, Door No. 29-1357/1/A
Deen Dayal Nagar, Naredmet
Malkajgiri- Medchal District
…..Petitioner/ Complainant
Vs
1. The State of Telangana
Through PS Neredmet, Rachakonda Rep.
by its Public Prosecutor.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda,
Vayupuri, Hyderabad 500094.
3. The SHO Neeredmet Police Station,
Rachakonda, Neeredmet, Hyderabad.
…Respondents
Affidavit
employed, R/o Plot No. 27, Door No. 29-1357/1/A, Deen Dayal
Witness No. 1 -
Witness No. 2 -
Pavan Kumar, News Reported by Profession, Resident of —-, who
record a few videos for reporting purposes, and those are already
submitted in court as video evidence. His witness will prove three
points maintain by police in their final report as false.
1. When on 18th September 2020 the next day after the incident
he reached the location and found sand, stones, and other
dust particles which should not there if there was huge rain
that cause the Road was overflowing with drain water. At the
same time, the road should be filled with sewage from the
drain but apparently, the road was clean.
2. In the final report page 5, the police maintained that “No
Repair was required for the Nala as it was duly safeguarded by
chain link fencing” which is again a false statement given by
the police department. As in the video it is clearly seen that
there was no such chain link fencing available there or even
no structure is also there which can prove that GHMC installed
chain link fencing earlier which was removed by local people.
3. One of the videos was recorded by Mr Pavan, and submitted
to the court as evidence to prove that the MLA Mynampally
Hanumanth Rao was discussing with the local people saying
that he is aware of the Open Nallah issue which is a long listing
problem in this area and he is working towards resolving it.
Which means there was a problem that was known by the
administration. But the Police are trying to hide the fact in their
report.
Hence this affidavit
Deponent
In
In
Between:-
Sukanya Kapuria
…..Petitioner/ Complainant
Vs
The state of Telangana,
Represented by Public
Prosecutor and another
……Respondent/ Respondent
Affidavit
Filed on
Filed by: