Professional Documents
Culture Documents
File 12
File 12
Code: E_BK3_SMTI
Examinator: F. Deken
Co-reader: C. van der Geest & S.A. Rijsdijk
Date:
Time:
Remarks:
Credit score: Maximum number of points is 100 (60 points for the open ended questions and
40 points for the multiple choice questions). To determine the grade for the exam, the
number of credits is divided by 10 and will be corrected for potential successful guessing at
the mc questions. Minimum score for the exam is 5.0. The score for the exam counts for
50% of the final grade for the course.
Grades:
Inspection:
Number of pages:
Good luck!
INSTRUCTIONS
There are no formal word limit for your answer, but we prefer concise (yet complete)
answers.
Schilling, M. (2019). Strategic management of technological innovation (6th ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Adner, R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business
review, 84(4), 98.
Ansari, S., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016). The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the US television
ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1829-1853
Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: granting access vs. devolving control.
Management Science, 56(10), Section 2. Literature and Background.
Christensen, C. and Raynor, M. (2003). The innovator’s solution, Chapter 2: How can we beat our most
powerful competitors? Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Cooper, R. (2008). The Stage-Gate Idea-to-Launch Process–Update, What’s New and NexGen
Systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 13–232–232.
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative
framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249.
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future.
Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338.
MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS
3. A “unicycle” is a vehicle that touches the ground with only one wheel. The most common
variation has a frame with a saddle, and has a pedal-driven direct drive. How does this
unicycle compare to the “safety bicycle”, which is the dominant design of bikes as we use
today (Lecture 2). Compared to the safety bicycle, I would categorize the unicycle as a:
a) Component innovation
b) Incremental innovation
c) Disruptive innovation
d) Architectural innovation
4. Christensen & Raynor (2003) describe sustaining innovations, low-end disruptions, new-
market disruptions, and hybrid disruptions. They explain that Southwest Airlines initially
targeted customers who were not flying (but rather used cars and buses) but also pulled
customers out of the low-end of major airlines’ value network. The authors therefore
describe Southwest Airlines’ services as a:
a) Low-end disruption
b) Hybrid disruption
c) New-market disruption
d) Sustaining innovation
5. In Lecture 3 (and Chapter 4) it was discussed that technologies may provide value to
users on three dimensions of value: standalone (technological) utility, complementary
products, and installed base. Considering these dimensions, which of the following
statements is FALSE?
a) Higher technological utility is the main driver whether users value one technology
over another.
b) If a new technology is compatible with the installed base and complementary products of
an incumbent technology, then it can deliver more value to users even by offering a small
improvement in its stand-alone utility compared to the incumbent technology.
c) Users may not necessarily rely on objective information in assessing the value offered by
a new technology - they are also affected by subjective assessment of their complementary
products and user bases.
d) If a new technology is incompatible with the installed base and complementary products
of an incumbent technology, then it should deliver a considerable improvement in its stand-
alone utility, such that, this improvement in the standalone utility is larger than the utility
users derive from the installed base and complementary products of the incumbent
technology.
6. Which of the following is NOT a factor driving the emergence of a dominant standard
(Lecture 3; Schilling Chapter 4)?
a) Increasing returns to production via learning curve effects
b) Government regulation pushing firms to adopt a single standard
c) Increasing returns to users by the availability of complementary goods (i.e., presence of
indirect network effects)
d) Government regulation to make two separate standards compatible with each other
in user base and complements
7. Consider a firm that has a resource that is valuable, rare, non-substitutable, and
IMITABLE. Which of the following is most likely be true regarding the competitive advantage
that this resource provides (Lecture 4):
a) Sustainable competitive advantage
b) Temporary competitive advantage
c) Competitive disadvantage
d) No advantage/disadvantage
8. We discussed Porter’s Five Forces in Lecture 4 (also addressed in Schilling, Chapter 6).
Consider a firm, whose largest two customer firms (each representing a large part of the
focal firm’s sales) have been recently merged. What does this merger mean from the
perspective of Five Forces analysis of the considered firm?
a) Higher bargaining power of buyers
b) Lower threat of substitutes
c) Higher bargaining power of suppliers
d) Lower degree of industry rivalry
9. Consider drawing a marble at random from an urn, for which you know the colors of
marbles within the urn, but you do not know how many marbles from each color are present
inside. Such a marble draw is an example of facing ....? (Lecture 5)
a) Uncertainty
b) Risk
c) Radical uncertainty
d) Chance
10. In Lecture 5 and Chapter 7 we discussed different tactics that firms use to set their R&D
budgets. R&D intensity refers to:
a) The ratio of R&D expenditures to sales
b) The costs of an agreed program
c) Previous levels of expenditure
d) None of the above
11. Considering open vs. proprietary platforms (Lecture 7 and Boudreau (2010)), which of the
following statements is true:
a) Completely open platforms help to capture/appropriate more value than proprietary
platforms
b) Proprietary platforms ensure rapid diffusion
c) Open platforms achieve economies of scope in innovation through complementor
efforts
d) Proprietary platforms have weak control of their architecture.
12. Consider that you are the innovation manager for a product under development.
Engineers suggest using a platform architecture (i.e., stable core components with varying
peripheral components) for the new product. For which of the following objectives would a
platform architecture be a POOR solution? (Lecture 7):
a) When you want to reduce R&D lead times for developing variants of the product
b) When you want the product to be customizable by recombining components
c) When you want to share components across variants of the product
d) When you want a very high performance and optimized product
13. Which of the following is NOT a potential risk of forming a strategic alliance? (Lecture 8,
Chapter 8)
a) Effectively sharing knowledge and learning is often too difficult
b) Commitment and coordination structure to facilitate collaboration are often
underestimated
c) A firm runs the risk of opportunism by the other firm and giving away too much
d) A firm runs the risk of becoming a ‘hollow’ firm
14. Which of the following is TRUE for a norms-based intellectual property (IP) regime?
(Lecture 8):
a) A norms-based IP regime relies on explicit and written rules of a given community
b) There is no punishment for violation of IP in norms-based regimes
c) Community members can effectively sanction violators of IP through shame,
denial, and reducing the status of the violator
d) Large electronics and tech companies mostly rely on a norms-based IP regime
15. In order for an innovation to be implemented, according to Adner (2006), firms have to
ensure that there is an alignment between several elements. Which of the following is
FALSE? (Week 4 - Ecosystems)
a) Firms have to align value exchanges (links) between actors in the ecosystems
b) Firms have to find mutual agreement between actors’ roles and position in the ecosystem
c) Firms have to ensure that each actor is satisfied with the activities they perform in the
ecosystem
d) Firms have to ensure that there are formal contracts between all ecosystem actors
16. Ansari et al (2016) describe how the TIVO innovation was confronted with several
coopetitive challenges when it was implemented in the TV ecosystem. They mention the
challenge of intertemporal coopetition. Intertemporal coopetition means that ….
a) an innovation can offer ecosystem members benefits in the future whereas the
innovation’s disruptive effects are felt immediately.
b) an innovation reduces the competitive advantage between the disruptor and an
ecosystem member.
c) the positions and roles of ecosystem members change as a result of the disruptive
innovation.
d) ecosystem members have to innovate their own products and services to create value
from the central/disruptive innovation.
17. Which option below characterizes the stage gate process? (Lecture 10) The stage gate
process …
a) is an innovative way for managing the new product development (NPD) process
b) manages the hand-overs from the marketing department to the engineering department,
to the manufacturing department
c) structures what information to consider for GO/NO GO decisions regarding NPD
projects
d) leads to escalating commitment to NPD projects
19. In Week 6 (and Schilling Chapter 12), four types of team structures were discussed.
Which type generally has the highest degree of cross-functional integration?
a) Autonomous team
b) Functional team
c) Lightweight team
d) Virtual team
20. Since much innovation arises from experimentation and improvisation, the _____
organization structure is typically better suited to creativity and innovation (Week 6).
a) mechanistic
b) formalized
c) standardized
d) organic
OPEN QUESTIONS
(The pattern by which superior new innovations arrive by displacing existing firms and jobs -
the latter part is the destructive part. Ice harvesters served large parts of the United States
and outside, until the refrigerator was invented and became widely adopted. Practically all
ice harvesters lost their jobs as a result.)
(Disruptive technologies were initially developed within the incumbent firms. Marketing
employees explored responses from important customers. Incumbents chose to invest (!) in
sustaining innovations. New companies were started that, through trial and error,
found new markets. These new companies and the performance of their products
moved upwards. The incumbent firms were too late to protect their market share. As such, it
was not because of myopia, a lack of interest or a lack of competences and expertise, but
because they were unable to change their strategy.)
(Short-term goals are needed to exploit existing products to reap profits from past
investment; the long-term goals are needed to direct innovation plans (explorative activities)
to realize future profits and be successful in the long-term. Ambidexterity proposes that first
should engage in both exploration and exploitation and hence balance the short-term and
long-term goals.)
(Strengths: Provide concrete financial estimates, explicitly consider timing of investment and
time value of money. Weaknesses: May be deceptive; only as accurate as original estimates
of cash flows, May fail to capture strategic importance of project, Takes existing situation as
stable (biased against risky and long term innovation)
(Economics perspective treats each side as a “customer” - innovators and their motivations
to innovate is purely transactional. Engineering perspective considers how platform
architecture impacts complementors’ motivation for innovation and their content/direction of
innovation)
(Blueprint strategy regards designing a compelling vision of the future ecosystem to motivate
actors to commit and is suggested to reduce uncertainty about the future ecosystem. An
adaptive strategy instead regards ecosystem strategy as both deliberative and emergent and
thus states that it requires continues adaptation)
(Answer key: When an individual in a team does not exert the expected amount of effort and
relies instead on the work of other team members. The potential for social loafing decreases
when individual team members can be evaluated on their individual performance, when
tasks are perceived as important, and in groups with high levels of social cohesion.)