See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/373999646

Comparison of Shape Grammar Utilization in Basic Design Studio: Manual

Techniques vs. Parametric Software in Emulation of Natural 2D Patterns

Article · April 2024

CITATIONS READS

0 263

1 author:

Erdem Yildirim
Dokuz Eylul University
14 PUBLICATIONS 11 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Erdem Yildirim on 18 September 2023.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

Comparison of Shape Grammar Utilization in Basic Design Studio:

Manual Techniques vs. Parametric Software in Emulation of
Natural 2D Patterns

Assist. Prof. Dr. Erdem YILDIRIM

erdem.yildirim@deu.edu.tr
Dokuz Eylül University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Türkiye
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-8829-5274

ABSTRACT
This paper examines the incorporation of shape grammar into architectural design
education in an effort to facilitate the imitation of natural 2D patterns in basic design
course. Shape grammar is a rule-based design methodology that permits designers and
architects to produce complex designs by defining a set of transformation rules. This study
investigates shape grammer with a comprehensive literature review and examines the
effectiveness of teaching shape grammar using both manual techniques and the visual
scripting program Grasshopper3D, a plug-in in Rhinoceros modelling software. The results
indicate that the combination of hands-on exercises and digital tools improves students'
comprehension of shape grammar and their ability to imitate natural 2D patterns in
architectural design. By investigating the integration of shape grammar and the imitation
of natural 2D patterns, this research paper aims to contribute to the advancement of
architectural design education. It offers insights into effective teaching methods and the
role of technology in enhancing students' comprehension of shape grammar and their
ability to create designs inspired by natural patterns.
Keywords: Basic design studio, shape grammar, parametric education, manual vs digital

1. INTRODUCTION
The incorporation of shape grammar into architectural design education has attracted
growing interest in recent times. The utilization of shape grammar, a design methodology
based on rules, provides architects with a systematic framework for creating intricate
designs through the establishment of a collection of transformation rules (Stiny, 1980).
One notable application of shape grammar in the early stages of the fundamental design
studio lies in its capacity to replicate organic two-dimensional patterns, thereby offering
an instrument to integrate the intricacies and intricacy of the natural world into
architectural compositions (Alkaim, 2015).

The replication of organic two-dimensional patterns in architectural design carries

substantial significance. Architects have historically drawn inspiration from the natural
world, which provides a diverse array of patterns, textures, and forms. Natural patterns,
such as the intricate branching of trees and the fractal arrangements observed in seashells,
possess a captivating complexity and an inherent logic that architects strive to emulate in
their designs. Architects have the ability to design structures that align with their
environment, elicit feelings of serenity, and encourage the adoption of sustainable design
principles through the study and emulation of these patterns (Marques & Eloy, 2013).

The inclusion of shape grammar instruction in architectural education presents a distinctive

avenue for acquainting students with the fundamental tenets of rule-based design and
facilitating their comprehension and replication of organic two-dimensional patterns.
Through a thorough understanding of the fundamental principles that dictate these
patterns, students have the ability to employ shape grammar methodologies in order to
generate designs that showcase comparable attributes. Additionally, the incorporation of
shape grammar within architectural design education promotes the development of critical

87
 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

thinking abilities, problem-solving aptitude, and a more profound comprehension of design

composition.

The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of two different methods for
teaching shape grammar: manual techniques and the utilization of Grasshopper software.
Manual techniques encompass practical exercises and analog collages, facilitating active
student involvement in the application of shape grammar principles through physical
means. In contrast, the Grasshopper software, which is a visual programming language
utilized under Rhino, provides architects with a digital platform to implement algorithmic
principles and produce complex designs. This study aims to assess the effects of both
manual techniques and digital tools on students' comprehension of shape grammar and
their proficiency in replicating natural 2D patterns. Through a comprehensive examination
of these teaching methods, the study seeks to determine the extent of their impact. The
objective of this study is to conduct an analysis of various approaches by means of case
studies and evaluation measures. The purpose is to assess the strengths and limitations of
each approach and ascertain their effectiveness in improving students' design skills.

The implications of the research findings have substantial relevance for the field of
architectural design education. The incorporation of shape grammar and the emulation of
natural 2D patterns into the curriculum during the third week of the Basic Design Studio
can furnish students with a robust groundwork in design principles and enable them to
generate intricate and contextually responsive architectural compositions. Moreover,
through the comparative analysis of manual techniques and digital tools, this research
endeavor will make a valuable contribution to the ongoing scholarly conversation
surrounding the influence of technology in the field of architectural education, as well as
the potential of digital platforms such as Grasshopper to augment students' design
proficiencies.

In the subsequent sections, we shall examine the theoretical underpinnings of shape

grammar, explore its connection with natural patterns, investigate the pedagogical
approaches involving manual techniques and Grasshopper software, illustrate the practical
implementation through case studies, assess the resulting outcomes, and engage in a
thorough discussion of the findings. The objective of this study is to make a scholarly
contribution to the field of architectural design education by highlighting the significance
of shape grammar and its capacity to facilitate the replication of natural two-dimensional
patterns.

2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Shape Grammar in Architecture
The utilization of shape grammar, a design methodology that originates from the
intersection of computer science and linguistics, has garnered considerable
acknowledgement as a potent instrument for architectural design (Tepavcevic &
Stojakovic, 2012). The proposed approach provides a structured framework for the
generation and manipulation of intricate designs through the utilization of a predefined set
of transformation rules. In the context of shape grammar, a design is conceptualized as a
configuration of shapes, which can undergo modifications according to predetermined rules
in order to generate novel designs. Through the establishment of a formal grammar,
architects are able to engage in the exploration and generation of a diverse array of design
variations, all the while upholding coherence and consistency within their compositions.

The principles of shape grammar exhibit a strong correlation with the domain of generative
design, placing significant emphasis on the investigation of design space and the creation
of innovative solutions (Aydın, 2012). Shape grammar is a computational design
methodology that allows architects to formalize their design intentions by establishing a
set of rules that govern the relationships and transformations between various shapes. The
principles outlined in these guidelines serve as a framework for the creation and alteration

88
 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

of geometric configurations, enabling designers to conceive intricate and multifaceted

architectural structures.

2.2. Shape Grammar and Natural 2D Patterns

An intriguing application of shape grammar in the field of architecture involves the
replication of natural two-dimensional patterns. Architects often find nature to be a rich
source of inspiration, as it presents a diverse array of patterns that possess both aesthetic
allure and fundamental structural principles. Illustrative instances encompass the intricate
spiral formations observed in seashells, the intricate network of branches exhibited by
trees, and the geometric arrangements of cells in honeycombs. Through the examination
and emulation of these organic patterns, architects have the ability to integrate their
intrinsic visual abstraction into architectural compositions. Shape grammar offers a robust
methodology for examining and formalizing these patterns through the use of
transformation rules. This enables designers to create designs that emulate the intricate
and visually captivating qualities of natural two-dimensional patterns.

The incorporation of natural patterns in architectural design extends beyond superficial

visual appeal. The subject matter encompasses the examination of structural efficiency,
the ability to adapt to environmental conditions, and the advocacy for sustainable design
practices. The emergence of natural patterns can be attributed to the processes of self-
organization, optimization, and adaptation within specific contexts, which have occurred
over an extended period of time. By replicating these patterns, architects have the ability
to access the innate knowledge of nature and develop designs that achieve a state of
harmony with their surroundings, maximize the utilization of resources, and foster the
development of sustainable built environments.

2.3. Teaching Shape Grammar in Architecture

The incorporation of shape grammar into architectural design education presents a
multitude of advantages for students. This facilitates the cultivation of a more profound
comprehension of design composition, spatial relationships, and formal language. Through
the utilization of shape grammar, students acquire the ability to engage in critical thinking
regarding design choices, systematically explore various design variations, and cultivate
an understanding and appreciation for the fundamental principles that govern architectural
form (Arpak, 2016).

Historically, the instruction of shape grammar has predominantly relied on manual

methodologies, including the utilization of pattern catalogues, practical exercises, and
collaborative design endeavors. According to Çolakoğlu et al., these approaches promote
active engagement among students by involving them in the physical manipulation of
shapes, analysis of their relationships, and experimentation with various rule-based
transformations (Çolakoğlu et al., 2008). The tactile nature of manual techniques facilitates
the development of students' spatial cognition and haptic comprehension of shape
grammar principles, thereby promoting a comprehensive learning experience.

The teaching of shape grammar has been extended into the digital domain due to the
emergence of computational design tools, such as Grasshopper software. According to
Slyk, Grasshopper, a visual programming language designed for Rhino, provides architects
with a platform to implement shape grammar principles through algorithmic design (Slyk,
2010). The utilization of rules within a digital environment enables the generation and
manipulation of intricate designs. The incorporation of Grasshopper within architectural
design education facilitates the introduction of students to the concepts of parametric
design thinking, algorithmic reasoning, and the possibilities for computational optimization.

2.4. Algorithmic Rule-based Design

Grasshopper, a widely adopted visual programming language and plugin integrated with
Rhino (Rutten & McNeel, 2007), has gained significant traction as an educational tool in

89
 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

architectural design. It is particularly valued for its efficacy in teaching shape grammar
principles within the realm of architectural education. The platform provides a digital
medium for architects to implement algorithmic design principles, facilitating the
generation of intricate and parametric designs by manipulating predefined rules. The
Grasshopper software offers a graphical user interface that enables students to visually
create and link components, which represent design elements and transformation rules.
The utilization of this visual representation serves to augment students' comprehension of
the interconnections among various elements and promotes the examination of diverse
design alternatives.

Grasshopper software's visual interface and ability to provide real-time feedback contribute
to its efficacy as a tool for comprehending the cause-effect relationships between rules and
design variations. Students have the opportunity to engage in experimentation with various
rule configurations, whereby they can observe the immediate alterations in the design and
subsequently enhance their approach through iterative refinement (Chairiyah et al., 2022).

One of the primary benefits of Grasshopper lies in its ability to facilitate parametric design
exploration. Parametric design enables the dynamic manipulation of design parameters,
thereby granting students the capacity to generate a wide range of design variations
(Schumacher, 2009, 2011). Through the establishment of parametric relationships within
the rules of shape grammar, students possess the ability to generate designs that possess
adaptability to various contexts and the capacity to accommodate evolving constraints
(Lee & Song, 2021). The parametric capabilities of the Grasshopper software foster a
mindset among students that goes beyond conventional static design solutions. One can
investigate the impact of various input parameters on the design output and examine the
interconnections among these parameters. This procedure facilitates the development of a
more profound comprehension of design optimization, adaptability, and the capacity to
create architectural compositions that are sensitive to their context.

The Grasshopper software exhibits a high level of compatibility with Rhino, a prevalent 3D
modeling software extensively employed in the field of architectural design. The integration
facilitates the ability of students to visually represent and enhance their designs within a
comprehensive 3D setting. Users have the capability to import 3D models, manipulate
geometric properties, and assess the spatial consequences of their investigations. The
visual characteristics of Grasshopper additionally enable the effective transmission of
design concepts. Students have the ability to create visually captivating representations of
their designs, which aids them in effectively presenting their ideas and participating in
meaningful discussions with their peers and instructors (Dino, 2012). Moreover, the
incorporation of Rhino software presents opportunities for additional analysis and
assessment, including structural simulations (Selmi̇ & İlerisoy, 2022), daylighting studies
(Eltaweel & SU, 2017), and fabrication processes in the prospective endeavors of the
students (Gallas et al., 2015; Radziszewski & Cudzik, 2019; Romaniak & Filipowski, 2018).

2.5. Computational Thinking and Digital Literacy

Through the utilization of a visual programming language, students are able to cultivate
proficiencies in algorithmic reasoning, logical cognition, and the ability to resolve complex
problems. Individuals develop an enhanced understanding of the capabilities of
computational tools in the realm of architectural design, as well as recognize the
significance of integrating digital methodologies into their professional endeavors
(Schnabel, 2012). This prompts individuals to engage in the exploration of alternative
algorithmic design methodologies, including generative design, optimization algorithms,
and machine learning (Naboni & Paoletti, 2018; Wortmann & Schroepfer, 2019). The
acquisition of computational thinking skills through this exposure provides students with
valuable abilities that are becoming more pertinent in modern architectural practice.

90
 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

According to El-Mahdy, Grasshopper software provides a robust platform for instructing

shape grammar in the field of architecture (El-Mahdy, 2022). The utilization of a visual
programming interface, algorithmic capabilities, and parametric design exploration
features facilitates the active involvement of students in the application of shape grammar
principles within a digital environment. Through the utilization of Grasshopper, students
are able to cultivate their computational thinking skills, augment their capabilities in design
exploration, and acquire expertise in digitally driven design.

3. Case Studies
In order to evaluate the efficacy of incorporating shape grammar instruction in
architectural education for replicating natural two-dimensional patterns, two case studies
were undertaken, employing both traditional manual methods and the utilization of
Grasshopper software. The primary objective of the case studies was to assess the
students' comprehension of shape grammar principles, their capacity to replicate natural
patterns, and the results of their design investigations.

3.1. Case Study 1: Manual Techniques

Hands-on exercises are an essential element in the pedagogy of teaching shape grammar
within the field of architecture. The exercises entail the physical manipulation of shapes,
enabling students to comprehend the interconnections among various elements and
investigate the effects of transformations based on rules. By engaging in practical
activities, students acquire a kinesthetic comprehension of shape grammar principles and
obtain valuable insights into the formal language of two-dimensional design. During
practical activities, students frequently engage with physical materials, such as paper,
cardboard, or foam boards. They participate in activities that entail the manipulation of
materials through cutting, folding, and assembling processes in order to generate patterns.
Students generate variations of shapes and examine the resulting design outcomes by
adhering to predetermined rules. This procedure facilitates the internalization of shape
grammar concepts, comprehension of cause-effect relationships between transformations,
and cultivation of an intuitive understanding of design composition.

Figure 1. Selected submissions of the students' shape grammar studies with manual techniques

91
 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

The initial case study involved the active engagement of a cohort of architecture students
in a practical workshop centered around the creation of patterns. Subsequently, the
students were tasked with a collaborative design project that required them to replicate a
particular 2D pattern found in nature through the utilization of manual techniques. The
participants engaged in collaborative activities within small groups, wherein they analyzed
the distinctive attributes of the patterns, discerned the fundamental principles governing
them, and formulated strategies for design.

The students participated in a series of iterative design exercises, utilizing tangible

materials such as paper, cardboard, and modeling clay. The individuals engaged in the
process of cutting, folding, and assembling the materials in order to produce compositions
that bore a resemblance to the chosen natural pattern. The students engaged in practical
experimentation and received feedback from their peers, resulting in the improvement of
their designs. Their efforts were directed towards capturing the fundamental characteristics
of the natural pattern, while also incorporating their own unique creative interpretations.
The findings of the case study demonstrated that the utilization of manual techniques
effectively facilitated a comprehensive comprehension of shape grammar principles. The
students acquired a heightened understanding of the interconnections among design
elements, the effects of rule-based transformations, and the complexities inherent in
natural patterns. The project's emphasis on collaboration facilitated the development of
critical thinking, communication, and collaboration abilities, thereby cultivating a
comprehensive educational encounter.

3.2 Case Study 2: Grasshopper Software

The second case study involved a cohort of architecture students who participated in a
workshop centered around the instruction of shape grammar, facilitated by the utilization
of Grasshopper software. The workshop commenced with an introductory session on
Grasshopper, encompassing fundamental aspects of the visual programming language and
its utilization in the generation of patterns.

Figure 2 Selected submissions of the students' shape grammar studies with Grasshopper software

92
 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

The students were presented with a sequence of instructional materials and practical tasks
centered around the development of parametric designs that drew inspiration from various
natural two-dimensional patterns. Subsequently, the students were allocated individual
design projects wherein they were tasked with replicating natural two-dimensional patterns
through the utilization of Grasshopper. The designers utilized algorithmic thinking and
parametric design exploration in order to formulate their designs, taking into account the
interconnections between design parameters and rule-based transformations. The
researchers employed the visualization capabilities of Grasshopper and Rhino software to
systematically assess and enhance their designs through iterative processes.

The case study provided evidence to support the claim that the utilization of Grasshopper
software resulted in an improvement in students' comprehension of shape grammar and
their proficiency in replicating natural patterns through the use of visual coding. The
utilization of parametric design exploration facilitated the generation of a diverse array of
design variations, thereby empowering students to conceive intricate and multifaceted
compositions.

3.3. Comparative Analysis and Findings

The utilization of both manual techniques and Grasshopper software in the two case studies
yielded significant findings regarding the pedagogy of shape grammar in architectural
design, specifically in the replication of natural two-dimensional patterns. The comparative
analysis of the findings yielded several noteworthy observations:

-The utilization of manual techniques facilitated the development of a haptic and instinctive
comprehension of shape grammar principles. The utilization of physical manipulation
techniques enabled students to cultivate a profound understanding of the interconnections
among design elements and the consequences of transformations governed by rules.
-The utilization of Grasshopper software enabled the application of algorithmic reasoning
and the exploration of parametric design. The students acquired proficiency in
computational thinking and digital literacy, thereby enhancing their capacity to generate
intricate designs and explore a diverse array of possibilities.

-Both methodologies presented possibilities for students to effectively replicate natural

two-dimensional patterns. The manual techniques fostered a collaborative environment
that promoted peer learning and facilitated creative interpretation. Additionally, the
utilization of Grasshopper's algorithmic capabilities enabled the creation of complex
procedural designs.

4. Evaluation of Results
The assessment of the pedagogical application of shape grammar in architecture for the
replication of natural two-dimensional patterns encompassed the evaluation of students'
comprehension of shape grammar principles, their proficiency in emulating natural
patterns, and the caliber of their design outputs. The assessment criteria encompassed
elements such as creativity, alignment with the chosen natural pattern, and compliance
with shape grammar principles.

Both manual techniques and the utilization of Grasshopper software demonstrated efficacy
in enhancing students' comprehension of shape grammar principles. In the case study on
manual techniques, the students exhibited a profound understanding of the
interconnections among design elements and the cause-and-effect relationships inherent
in rule-based transformations. The individuals demonstrated proficiency in expressing and
implementing shape grammar principles during their design investigations.

Likewise, the Grasshopper software case study demonstrated that the students possessed
a comprehensive comprehension of algorithmic design and parametric thinking. The
researchers proficiently employed the components and parameters of Grasshopper to

93
 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

establish shape grammar rules and investigate diverse design variations. The software
platform facilitated the visualization of the effects of rule-based transformations on design
outcomes, thereby enhancing the users' comprehension of shape grammar principles.

The case studies revealed a range of design outcomes, exhibiting varying levels of quality,
wherein certain students demonstrated greater success in their designs compared to
others. Nevertheless, in general, the designs exhibited a notable degree of ingenuity,
consistency with the chosen natural patterns, and adherence to the principles of shape
grammar.

5. DISCUSSION
5.1. Design Outcomes and Expressiveness
In this section, we will discuss the design outcomes and expressiveness of a given design.
The design outcomes refer to the results or consequences of a design The assessment of
design results in both case studies unveiled a diverse array of innovative and
communicative designs. The students were able to effectively replicate natural two-
dimensional patterns, accurately capturing both their aesthetic and structural qualities.
The utilization of manual techniques facilitated the creation of distinct interpretations and
physical interactions, leading to the development of architectural compositions that are
sensitive to their specific contexts. The utilization of Grasshopper software facilitated the
ability of students to generate intricate and multifaceted designs, thereby demonstrating
the expressive capabilities of shape grammar within digital contexts.

5.2. Constraints and Prospects for Future Research

The case studies provided evidence regarding the efficacy of incorporating shape grammar
instruction in architectural education. However, it is important to acknowledge and address
certain constraints and restrictions associated with this approach. The study's sample size
was comparatively small, which restricts the extent to which the findings can be applied to
a broader population. Furthermore, the assessment primarily concentrated on immediate
results, neglecting to evaluate the lasting effects on students' design abilities and their
subsequent professional development. Subsequent investigations may consider expanding
the sample size and delving into the enduring impacts of shape grammar education on the
field of architectural design.

In addition, there is potential for further exploration in the integration of additional

computational tools and techniques, such as machine learning and generative design
algorithms, to broaden the range of applications in shape grammar education.
Furthermore, the inclusion of tangible architectural projects and the examination of how
shape grammar principles can be applied in practical design scenarios may yield additional
knowledge regarding the utilization of shape grammar in professional settings.

6. CONCLUSION
The pedagogy of shape grammar in the field of architecture, whether taught through
traditional methods or facilitated by the employment of Grasshopper software, offers a
potentially effective strategy for emulating organic two-dimensional patterns. The case
studies conducted in this study have provided evidence of the efficacy of both approaches
in improving students' comprehension of shape grammar principles, their capacity to
replicate natural patterns, and the caliber of their design results.

The utilization of manual techniques facilitated a kinesthetic and instinctive educational

encounter, enabling students to investigate the principles of shape grammar through direct
interaction with physical materials. This methodology facilitated the development of
innovative thinking, cooperative efforts, and a comprehensive comprehension of the causal
relationships associated with rule-based transformations. In contrast, the utilization of
Grasshopper software facilitated the active involvement of students in algorithmic
reasoning, exploration of parametric design, and meticulous manipulation of design

94
 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

parameters. The platform offered a digital interface for the visualization and manipulation
of shape grammar rules, leading to the creation of intricate designs that are responsive to
their respective contexts.

The incorporation of shape grammar instruction in architectural education has

demonstrated its efficacy in fostering the development of computational thinking abilities
and digital literacy among students. The utilization of Grasshopper software facilitated the
cultivation of algorithmic reasoning, logical thinking, and problem-solving proficiencies
among the students. The individuals developed a high level of competence in a visual
programming language and obtained abilities that are becoming more and more pertinent
in modern architectural work.

The assessment of design outcomes in both case studies unveiled a diverse array of
innovative and artistic designs. The students were able to effectively replicate natural two-
dimensional patterns, accurately capturing both their aesthetic and structural qualities.
The integration of manual techniques and the utilization of Grasshopper software facilitated
a holistic educational encounter, effectively bridging the divide between theoretical
comprehension and the application of design in practice.

The case studies have yielded valuable insights; however, it is imperative to acknowledge
their inherent limitations. The study employed a limited sample size, and the assessment
primarily emphasized immediate results. A more comprehensive understanding of the
impact of shape grammar education on architectural design skills and professional practice
could be achieved through additional research that incorporates larger sample sizes and
long-term assessments.

In summary, the pedagogical utilization of shape grammar in architectural education,

employing both manual methods and computer-aided design software, presents a valuable
instructional strategy for emulating organic two-dimensional pattern. Both methodologies
enhance students' comprehension of shape grammar principles, their capacity to replicate
natural patterns, and the caliber of their design results. Shape grammar education is a
pedagogical approach that aims to cultivate creativity, collaboration, computational
thinking, and digital literacy among students. These skills are considered highly valuable
for their future architectural practice in the context of the digital age.

REFERENCES
Alkaim, A. (2015). Procedural Generation for Architecture. Computer Science.
http://www.grasshopper3d.com/
Arpak, A. (2016). Seeing As Aesthetic Experience And Creative Action: Visual Practices
With Shape Grammars In Design Education [PhD]. MIT.
Aydın, S. (2012). A Parametric Quasi-Grammar for Generating a Flexible Urban Design
Tool: Shape Grammars Optimised by Evolutionary Algorithms [Master]. University of
Liverpool.
Chairiyah, R., Yetti, A. E., & Pujiyanti, I. (2022). The Grasshopper+Rhino for 3D
Modelling in Indonesian’s Education of Biomimetic Architecture. www.rhino3d.com
Çolakoğlu, B., Yazar, T., & Uysal, S. (2008). Educational Experiment on Generative Tool
Development in Architecture PatGen: Islamic Star Pattern Generator. In ecaade (pp.
685–692). http://www.bot.yildiz.edu.tr
Dino, I. G. (2012). Creative design exploration by parametric generative systems in
architecture. Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 29(1), 207–224.
https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2012.1.12
El-Mahdy, D. (2022). Learning by Doing: Integrating Shape Grammar as a Visual Coding
Tool in Architectural Curricula. Nexus Network Journal, 24(3), 701–716.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-022-00608-w

95
 Online Journal of Art and Design
volume 12, issue 2, April 2024

Eltaweel, A., & SU, Y. (2017). Parametric design and daylighting: A literature review. In
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Vol. 73, pp. 1086–1103). Elsevier Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.011
Gallas, M.-A., Jacquot, K., Jancart, S., Delvaux, F., & Delvaux, F. (2015). Parametric
Modeling: An Advanced Design Process for Architectural Education.
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02890293
Lee, K. S., & Song, H. K. (2021). Automation of 3D average human body shape modeling
using Rhino and Grasshopper Algorithm. Fashion and Textiles, 8(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-021-00249-6
Marques, E., & Eloy, S. (2013). Customized Crok Façade. In Rudi. Stouffs & Sevil.
Sariyildiz (Eds.), Computation and performance (Vol. 1, pp. 621–626).
Naboni, R., & Paoletti, I. (2018). Architectural Morphogenesis Through Topology
Optimization. In D. Domenico (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Form and
Morphogenesis in Modern Architectural Contexts (pp. 69–92). IGI Global.
Radziszewski, K., & Cudzik, J. (2019). Parametric Design in Architectural Education.
World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 17(4), 448–453.
Romaniak, K., & Filipowski, S. (2018). Parametric Design in the Education of Architecture
Students. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 16(4),
386–391.
Rutten, D., & McNeel, R. (2007). Grasshopper3D. Robert McNeel & Associates.
Schnabel, M. A. (2012). Learning parametric designing. Computational Design Methods
and Technologies: Applications in CAD, CAM and CAE Education, 56–70.
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-180-1.ch004
Schumacher, P. (2009). Parametricism: A New Global Style for Architecture and Urban
Design. Architectural Design, 79(4), 14–23.
Schumacher, P. (2011). The Autopoiesis of Architecture, Volume I: A New Framework for
Architecture. In John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Vol. I (Issue 9).
https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=-
mXFdggEOz8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=schumacher+2011+architecture+autopoies
is&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiz4bqe16vzAhWySvEDHY5bAsYQ6AF6BAgIEAI#v=on
epage&q=schumacher 2011 architecture autopoiesis&f=false
Selmi̇, M., & İlerisoy, Z. Y. (2022). A Comparative Study of Different Grasshopper Plugins
for Topology Optimization in Architectural Design. Journal of Science, 3(10), 323–
334. http://dergipark.gov.tr/gujsb
Slyk, J. (2010). Generating through Understanding Pattern language revisited to support
reasoning and creation in architecture. In C. Spiridonidis & M. Voyatzaki (Eds.),
Educating Architects Towards Innovative Architecture (pp. 381–387). EAAE.
Stiny, G. (1980). Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars. Environment and Planning
B: Planning and Design, 7(3), 343–351. https://doi.org/10.1068/b070343
Tepavcevic, B., & Stojakovic, V. (2012). Shape grammar in contemporary architectural
theory and design. Facta Universitatis - Series: Architecture and Civil Engineering,
10(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.2298/fuace1202169t
Wortmann, T., & Schroepfer, T. (2019). From optimization to performance-informed
design. Simulation Series, 51(8), 261–268.

96

View publication stats