Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6.remedies in Tort
6.remedies in Tort
1) Introduction
As a matter of justice an injured person may have several possible remedies available under
tort laws and he can take legal action against wrong doer if his tort has been legally
recognized. There are two types of remedies in law of tort, legal remedy by which injured
person is compensated by the wrong doer in the form of money against his damage through
the court of law. 2nd is an injunction is an order of the court of the law which prohibits
wrong doer from doing something wrong in future again. Both of above are the legal
remedies in favor of injured person for his injury by wrong doer
2) Meaning of remedy
Judicial order to someone to make payment for damage is called remedy
3) Definition of remedy
It is such penalty when injured person is compensated by the wrong doer against violation
of his right through court of law is called remedy
4) Kinds of remedies
Following are the two kinds of remedies
Judicial remedies
Extra judicial remedies
1. Judicial remedies
Judicial remedy also called legal remedy , these are those remedies which are being
enforced by the court of law in shape of penalty in favor of injured person against wrong
doer
Kinds of damages
Following are the kinds of damages
1) Special damages,
2) General damages
3) Exemplary damages
4) Real damages
5) Nominal damages
6) Contemptuous damages
b. Injunction
In law of tort, an injunction is a court order which prohibits wrong doer from doing
something wrong in future again
Kinds of injunctions
Following are the kinds of injunctions
a. Self Help
In law of tort, self-help is an extra judicial remedy. When one found himself in
danger from other person. In this case each and every person has right to use of
reasonable force for the protection of himself or his family
b. Re-entry of land
In law of tort, self-help is an extra judicial remedy. When one found his property
under illegal control of another person. In this case each and every person has right
to use of reasonable force in order to get his property free from trespasser
c. Expulsion of trespasser
In law of tort, expulsion of trespasser is an extra judicial remedy; trespasser is a
person who commits an act of trespassing on a property without the permission of
the owner. In this case owner can expel a trespasser or trespassing animal without
the help court in order to keep them away from re entering
d. Reception of goods
In law of tort, reception of goods is an extra judicial remedy, if a person who has
been deprived from his property or things he has right of repossesses them
without the help of court
e. Abatement of nuisance
In law of tort, abatement of nuisance is an extra judicial remedy, if a person is
being irritated by an object in this case he has right to remove (abate) the nuisance
without the help of court
5) Objectives of remedy
The objectives of remedy in law of tort is the protection of the rights of persons, right of
property and right of reputation are included in this law.
The primary objective of remedy in the law of tort is to compensate the injured person by
the wrong doer against the violation of his legally recognized right
The second objective of remedy in the law of tort to build a financial pressure on wrong
doer by receiving an amount for compensation in the form of money for injured person
The third objective of remedy in the law of tort is to stop those who intentionally or
negligently violates the right of others
The fourth objective of the remedy is the satisfaction of the injured person
1) Criminal wrongs
2) Breach of contracts
3) Breach of trust
Example
If A enters into the land of B without permission of B. A has committed tort of trespass.
7) Conclusion
There is not wrong without remedy. The law of torts provides two kinds of remedies which
are judicial and extra judicial remedies. The judicial remedies are those remedies which have
been enforced by the court of law in order to compensate the injured person by the wrong
doer. The extra judicial remedies are those remedies which are not connected with the
courts but have been accepted by the courts of law. But in this case injured person has been
entitled to use of force or he can take action on his own without the help of court