Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Channel Management
Channel Management
Channel Management
Internet channel conflict is a conflict that occurs when Internet and traditional bricks-and mortar
channels destructively compete against each other when selling to the same market
Intermediaries that fear the negative effects of disintermediation may fight back against
manufacturers. Because the intensity and frequency of channel conflicts continue to increase,
channel conflict Management is an urgent issue in the e-business era.
The scheme was revised to fit the Internet channel conflict domain, and named the Internet
channel conflict measurement (ICCM) instrument.
After all top managers responsible for Internet channel decisions answer the ICCM questions,
each organization can identify its predominant Internet channel conflict management style
through averaging all scores and performing basic statistical calculations.
If two or three styles are found to have similarly high scores, a focus group study may be used
to select which is most appropriate.
The next step is to get more detailed information based on the experiences of other companies
“Success” means Internet channel conflict has been fully or partially resolved by applying a
specific conflict management strategy
Such stories may be found in e-business magazines, the news media, and some practitioner
oriented journals, as well as on Web sites
After analyzing the cases, five channel conflict management strategies were identified:
Intermediary support strategy is used by manufacturers with low concern for self but high
concern for intermediaries.
In this situation, manufacturers adopt a passive Internet channel strategy, and use their Web
sites to support existing intermediaries.
For example, a manufacturer may develop e-business infrastructure for its intermediaries,
advertise product information instead of product sales, and give e-customers the location of the
nearest local intermediaries.
Differentiation strategy
Differentiation strategy is used in situations in which manufacturers have high concern both for
self and their intermediaries.
Such manufacturers seek ways to differentiate themselves from their intermediaries. To do this,
they utilize strategies such as market and product differentiation to minimize the cannibalization
of existing channels
Using the market differentiation strategy involves separating customers into groups, and
addressing each group using different channels.
Conflict avoidance strategy is used by manufacturers with low concern for self and others.
These manufacturers are successful in “sneaking” into direct Internet channel sales, but only by
making some sacrifices.
Such manufacturers adopt an aggressive strategy and push intermediaries to accept their
decisions. In some cases, manufacturers sever relationships with previous intermediaries and
sell their products exclusively on the Internet.
In other cases, they aggressively merge their previous intermediaries into their company to
remove the channel conflict.
Compromising strategy
Two types of compromising strategies exist: information sharing-strategy and profit sharing
strategy
The information-sharing strategy involves sharing information collected through online sales
between manufacturers and intermediaries Manufacturers that employ the profit-sharing
strategy share profits derived from online sales with intermediaries.
Before making their final choice of channel conflict management strategy, managers should pay
special attention to other channel-related factors such as channel power, dependency,
environment, and product characteristics.
Channel power, the ability to control the decision variables of the marketing strategies of
channel members at different distribution levels, is the most frequently recognized causative
factor of channel conflicts
When a manufacturer holds a powerful channel position, it may have more concern for self, and
may therefore choose more self-oriented Internet channel conflict management strategies, such
as the differentiation strategy and the channel absorption strategy
Channel dependency has three components: the relative size of a business’s contribution to
profits; the commitment of one channel member to another member in terms of the relative
importance of the latter’s marketing policies; and the difficulty in effort and cost faced by a
channel member in attempting to replace another member as a supply source or as a customer.
After considering their organizational resource capabilities, and the costs and benefits of
multiple channel conflict management strategies, companies can select and combine multiple
strategies for a unique competitive advantage.
2) Strategic Sourcing
3) Fee-based Services
5) Technology Spending
1) Efficiency
2) Effectiveness
3) Adaptability
Channel Types -
1. Master Distributor
3. Manufacturing Reps
4. Brokers
The issues in this case are related to Horizontal, Vertical, and Multi Channel Conflicts.
1) Goal Incompatibility
The need of the hour for HiteVision was to resolve the conflict with a single brand when they
went to the commercial IFPD business.
The other methods are PROBLEM SOLVING (through meetings and joint planning) and
Bargaining (doing a Trade-off). Horizontal Conflict between distributors of the educator segment
and the commercial segment was due to domain dissensus.
Vertical conflict between HiteVision and commercial distributors was due to goal incompatibility.
The conflict between Lamoro and HiteVision plus e-commerce was due to different perceptions
of reality.
Rest of the cases (All important concepts taught) - Call if there is any issue.
1) Tamul Plates -
We have to look at the levels, density, variety as well as novelty of the channels.
Sir taught about the segmental analysis (Studying about different segments) plus we also need
to
note down Channel characteristics and level of impact of each channel + Look at the maturity of
Identifying Market Segments: Companies divide their target market into distinct
segments based on factors such as demographics, psychographics, geographic location,
behavior, and purchasing power.
Understanding Segment Preferences: For each identified segment, companies gather
data to understand their preferences, buying behaviors, and channel preferences. This
includes assessing whether a segment prefers online shopping, brick-and-mortar stores,
direct sales, or other channels.
Customizing Distribution Channels: Once the preferences of different segments are
understood, companies can tailor their distribution channels to match those preferences.
For example, if a segment prefers online shopping, the company would focus on
e-commerce platforms and digital marketing efforts to reach that segment effectively.
Allocating Resources: Companies allocate resources based on the potential and
importance of each segment. Segments with higher potential may receive more
investment in terms of distribution channels, marketing campaigns, and customer
service.
Optimizing Reach and Convenience: Segmental analysis helps companies ensure that
their products are available where customers expect them to be. This optimization of
distribution channels enhances convenience for customers, increasing the likelihood of
sales.
Enhancing Customer Experience: By catering to the specific needs and preferences of
different segments, companies can create a more personalized and relevant customer
experience, leading to higher customer satisfaction and loyalty.
Iterative Process: Segmental analysis is not a one-time effort. As market dynamics
change and consumer behaviors evolve, companies need to continuously monitor and
analyze segments to ensure their distribution strategies remain effective.
2) Schiit Audio - Vertical Compression ; Composite channels ; Trade-off Analysis; Horizontal
Diversity ; Functional Decomposition; The concept of Market Fragmentation and Growth Rate,
Threshold legitimacy
Composite channels in channel management refer to the use of multiple distribution channels to
reach a target market. These channels can include various intermediaries and methods such as
wholesalers, retailers, e-commerce platforms, direct sales, distributors, and more. Organizations
often employ composite channels to maximize their reach, cater to diverse customer
preferences, and achieve broader market coverage. This strategy allows companies to leverage
the strengths of different channels while mitigating the limitations of individual channels.
Effective management of composite channels requires coordination, clear communication, and a
deep understanding of customer behaviors and market dynamics.
Trade-off analysis in channel management involves evaluating the pros and cons of different
distribution channels to make informed decisions. It considers costs, control, reach, customer
experience, efficiency, and partner capabilities. The goal is to balance these factors to select the
most effective channels for reaching target customers and achieving business goals. This
analysis helps in optimizing the distribution strategy and ensuring consistency across channels.
Horizontal diversity in channel management involves utilizing multiple distribution channels that
operate at the same level within the distribution chain. This approach helps companies reach a
wider audience and reduces dependency on a single channel. It can enhance market coverage
and customer engagement, but requires careful coordination to maintain consistency across
channels.
Functional decomposition in channel management involves breaking down the various functions
and tasks within a distribution channel into smaller, manageable components. This allows for a
clearer understanding of the roles and responsibilities of each entity within the channel. By
breaking down the functions, companies can identify areas of improvement, streamline
processes, and optimize the overall channel performance. It helps in allocating tasks efficiently,
improving coordination, and enhancing the effectiveness of the entire distribution process.
Market fragmentation in channel management refers to the division of a market into smaller and
distinct segments or niches based on specific characteristics, preferences, or needs of
consumers. As markets become more diverse and consumer demands vary, companies often
find it beneficial to tailor their distribution strategies to cater to these specific segments
effectively.
In the context of channel management, market fragmentation requires companies to adapt their
distribution channels to reach these segmented markets efficiently. This might involve creating
specialized channels for different customer groups, selecting appropriate intermediaries, and
developing unique marketing messages for each segment. The goal is to ensure that the
distribution channels align with the preferences and behaviors of the target segments,
enhancing customer satisfaction and overall market performance.
Threshold legitimacy in channel management refers to the minimal level of credibility and
acceptance that a channel member must meet to be considered a legitimate participant in the
distribution network. It ensures that channel partners meet specific criteria, such as financial
stability and adherence to regulations, fostering trust and effective collaboration within the
channel. This concept helps mitigate risks and protect brand reputation by maintaining a
baseline standard of reliability among channel members.
3) Krishna Textiles - Channel Objectives ; The objectives of Wholesaler and retailers should
align.
Value chain analysis. Channel Disintermediation; Forward and Backward Integration; Pipeline
each channel is evolved ; Need to do category wise analysis (for increasing frequency of
purchase); Core competencies of each channel to arrive at the perfect channel mix.
5) Y-comet - The differences between LCV and HCV. Possible causes for low conversion rate
of Inquiries. Understanding of Sales process and benchmarking; One cannot design the channel
without understanding the customer segments;
Imp methodology -
1. First we need to understand the market segments and their buying behaviour.