Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lab Report Chm571 Exp Aas
Lab Report Chm571 Exp Aas
SEMESTER: 2
GROUP: AS2292A1
TITLES MARKS
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVE
METHOD
RESULT
DATA/CALCULATION
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Total:
OBJECTIVE
1. To determine the concentration of calcium in a tap water using a standard calibration
curve and standard addition method.
METHOD
For Part I, which is the Calibration Curve Method, a series of standard solutions of the
following concentrations were prepared from standard 100 ppm stock solutions: 2, 4, 6, 8 and
10 ppm. Then, an empty water (deionized water) was run before solution measurements were
made. Next, absorption of standard solution series; 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 ppm were measured. The
absorption of an unknown calcium solution was measured. Then, tap water absorption was
measured. After that, absorption ratio of 1: 1 (tap water: distilled water) was measured.
Lastly, the calibration curve (Absorption versus standard calcium concentration) was plotted
and the calcium concentration in an unknown calcium solution, tap water, 1: 1 tap water to
distilled water ratio was determined.
For Part II, the Standard Addition Method. Firstly, 5 mL of an unknown calcium
solution was transferred into six 100 mL volumetric flasks. The flask for a series of solutions
were prepared and labelled for standard addition methods. Next, a standard calcium solution
(100 ppm) was added by 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 mL in each of the six volumetric flasks at number 1,
respectively. Then, each of the six volumetric flasks was filled with distilled water to the
mark. After that, the absorption of the solution series for the standard addition method was
measured. Lastly, the concentration of calcium in an unknown calcium solution has been
determined.
RESULTS
DATA/CALCULATION
PRE LAB
Preparation of standard solution:
C1V1 = C2V2
0 0
2 2
4 4
6 6
8 8
10 10
Blank 0.0000
2 0.2169
4 0.3350
6 0.4359
8 0.5390
10 0.6337
0.5 0.4359
0.4 0.335
1:1 = 0.3671
0.3 0.2169
0.2
0.1 5.1174 ppm
10.1223 ppm
0
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
1 0 0 X+0 0.4297
2 1 1 X+2 0.6038
3 2 2 X+4 0.6898
4 3 3 X+6 0.7849
5 4 4 X+8 0.8595
6 5 5 X + 10 0.9407
Table 2: Absorbance of Ca in addition of unknown
Absorbance (A) VS standard concentration (ppm)
1 0.9407
0.8595
0.9 f(x) = 0.0488171428571429 x + 0.473980952380952
0.7849
0.8 R² = 0.975276062140085
0.6898 (5, 0.9407)
ABSORBANCE, A
0.7 0.6038
0.6
0.4297
0.5
0.4
0.3
(0, 0.4)
0.2
0.1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
1 2 3 4 x 5 6
STANDARD CONCENTRATION (PPM)
y = mx+c
y = 0.0488x+0.474 Cx = b C standard
m Vx
= (0.474)(100ppm)
(0.0488) (5ml)
Cx = 194.2623ppm
Cx = concentration unknown
b = pathlength (y-intercept)
m = gradient
Vx = volume unknown (5 ml)
C standard = 100ppm
Find Cx
In this experiment, a straight line without a cross y-axis is displayed on the graph
using the standard calibration curve method. Deionized water (1:1 v/v) has a calcium content
of 5.1174 ppm, whereas tap water has a calcium concentration of 10.1223 ppm. The
calibration curve approach was used to extract the data from the graph. Compared to other
types of water, tap water has the highest quantity of calcium. It is due to the fact that tap
water is not pure, meaning it contains a lot of minerals. Calcium and magnesium are the two
minerals that are most frequently found in "hard" water. The level of hardness rises together
with the calcium concentration in water. This is the main reason why tap water has the
highest concentration of calcium compared to others when determined by using the
calibration curve method.
The graph pattern for the standard addition method is also a straight line, but it crosses
the y-axis at 0.40. It's because the solution contains elements of the unknowable. It is possible
to compute the concentration of unknown added, which is 194.2623ppm. In the standard
addition method, the concentration of the unknown rises as the volume of standard added
rises; hence, absorbance rises as well. It is as a result of Beer's Law, which states that the
absorbance is directly proportionate to the concentration. The amount of light that interacts
with molecules determines how much of it is absorbed.
A few mistakes could be made during the carrying out of this experiment, producing
an unreliable outcome. Take into account the mistake of misreading the pipette mark when
creating standard solutions. To ensure an accurate transfer of solution volume, the eye should
be perpendicular to the pipette mark. The following error was dropping the solution while it
was being diluted. An excessive drop of solution could skew the reading. Another potential
source of mistake in this experiment is leaching or absorption by the container material. To
reduce mistake, be sure to calibrate and clean the glasses properly beforehand. Last but not
least, before doing the experiment, make sure to cover the volumetric flask with the stopper
and swirl it thoroughly. In addition to obtaining accurate results, it is to prevent
contamination and leaking out of the solution.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Raja, P. M. V., & Barron, A. R. (2022, August 29). Introduction to Atomic Absorption
Spectroscopy. Rice University. https://chem.libretexts.org/@go/page/55813