Walkability

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

WALKABILITY

 Pedestrian friendly design


 Front porches
 Trees lined the streets.
 10-minute walk radius
CONNECTIVITY
 Interconnected street grid network
 Narrow streets, Boulevard, and alleys
MIXED USED &DIVERSITY
 Live workshop within blocks and within buildings
 Diversity of people of ages, income levels, cultures, and races
MIXED HOUSING
 A range of types, sizes, and prices in closer proximity
QUALITY ARCHITECTURE & URBAN DESIGN
 Creating a sense of place:
 Placement of civic uses and sites within community.
 Human scale architecture
TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD STRUCTURE
 Public space at center
 A range of uses & densities within 10-15 minutes’ walk.
 Transect planning highest densities at town center.
 Create mix of natural habitats & urban setting
SUSTAINABILITY
 Minimal environmental impact of development and operations
 Eco-friendly technologies & value of natural systems
 Energy efficiency
 Less use of finite fuels
 More local productions
QUALITY OF LIFE
 Pride in sense of place
 Healthier spaces that contribute to wellbeing

STUDENT NAME: INSTRUCTOR DATE


PROJECT TITLE: STUDENT NO. RATING
PEGORIA, KIMY JANE S. AR. PRINCE CARLO BAUTISTA SEPT 17,2023
SUBJ. CODE & TITLE: SCHEDULE SHEET NO.
RESEARCH 01 202011051
COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE AD 40187 -ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 7 MONDAY -AD LEC 7 5-6PM 08-10
Ancient communal living sounds like a flashback to the 1970s when hippies lived together
in communes to oppose traditional capitalist principles and promote a different way of
life. Although the idea of communal living wasn't invented by hippies, it has recently had
a rebirth and could soon become the standard for millennials and their families.

In the middle age communal living remained the norm. Homes were
basically social gathering spaces for small groups of transient
inhabitants, serving as a conceptual bridge between hunter-gatherer
lifestyles and modern living patterns. According to historian John
Gillis, single-family households were unusual in most of the world
during the Middle Ages, and most medieval homes were made up of a
mix of acquaintances and extended relatives.

Millennial communal living and communal architecture began to resurface within the millennial
culture. Blame digital living, housing prices, or the unwillingness to
settle, but millennial values lend themselves increasingly well to
communal architecture. Typical millennial characteristics are that they
are tech-savvy, desire a good work-life balance that is more relaxed in
nature, they look for authentic experiences while at the same time
craving instant access to things. Trend have shown that millennials are willing to give up a portion of
their personal space in return for more communal areas.

STUDENT NAME: INSTRUCTOR DATE


PROJECT TITLE: STUDENT NO. RATING
PEGORIA, KIMY JANE S. AR. PRINCE CARLO BAUTISTA SEPT 17,2023
SUBJ. CODE & TITLE: SCHEDULE SHEET NO.
RESEARCH 01 202011051
COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE AD 40187 -ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 7 MONDAY -AD LEC 7 5-6PM 04-10
C. Innovation Focus
 should open new possibilities to the community.

 Performance Dimensions Vitality


the degree to which the form of the places supports the functions, biological requirements and capabilities of human being (example: Structures,
Environment)
 Sense
The degree to which places can be clearly perceived or structured in time and space by users(example: Signage, Way finding, Signs and Symbols, Mental
Maps)
 Fit
The degree to which the form and capacity of spaces matches the pattern of behaviors that people engage in or want to engage in (example: District,
Public Spaces, Land use, Flexibility of Spaces)
 Access
The ability to reach other persons, activities, resources, services, information, or places including the quantity and diversity of elements that can
be reached. (Example: )
 Control
The degree to which those who use or reside in places can create and manage access to space activities.
(Example: Enclosures, Security, Buffer Areas)

STUDENT NAME: INSTRUCTOR DATE


PROJECT TITLE: STUDENT NO. RATING
PEGORIA, KIMY JANE S. AR. PRINCE CARLO BAUTISTA SEPT 17,2023
SUBJ. CODE & TITLE: SCHEDULE SHEET NO.
RESEARCH 01 202011051
COMMUNITY ARCHITECTURE AD 40187 -ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 7 MONDAY -AD LEC 7 5-6PM 02-10

You might also like