FORM UPDATED: August 2019

THE UNIVERSITY OF ST. LA SALLE

GRADUATE SCHOOL AND CONTINUING EDUCATION

COMMENTS AND SUGGESTIONS FORM

DATE

COLLEGE/DEPARTMENT:

RESEARCH AGENDA:

RESEARCH PROPOSAL TITLE:

PROPONENT(S): PALOMATA

PANEL MEMBERS

Documenter

TO BE FILLED IN BY
TO BE FILLED IN BY THE EVALUATOR
THE STUDY LEADER

Comments and suggestions Action Taken Refer to

page#

TITLE

INTRODUCTION

Background of the Study

Statement of the Problem You may consider adding SOP on significant

difference in the pre-test and post test
scores of the control group to determine
whether the modular print learning
modality improves student learning.

Hypothesis/Hypotheses

Theoretical/Conceptual
Framework

Scope and Limitations

Significance of the Study

Definition of Terms

1
The Documenter is requested to please email to the consolidated form to both the Proponents(s) and CRE at
urc@usls.edu.ph within 1-2 days after the deliberation.Thank you.
 FORM UPDATED: August 2019

Review of Related Literature

METHODS/MATERIALS AND
METHODS

Research Design

Respondents/Participants/Subjects

Instrument/ Description of Validity of Research Instrument (p. 25)

Product/Prototype paragraph 3. Review the statement because
4.6 is the mean validity score for the
instrument which includes the performance
task and another mean validity score was
mentioned which is 4.8 for performance
task. Clearly indicate what these validity
scores signify.

Kindly also double check the applicability of

Kuder-Richardson 20 for reliability testing
because KR 20 is used to measure internal
consistency for measures with dichotomous
choices. If your instruments is more than
two choices better use Cronbach’s alpha.

2
The Documenter is requested to please email to the consolidated form to both the Proponents(s) and CRE at
urc@usls.edu.ph within 1-2 days after the deliberation.Thank you.
 FORM UPDATED: August 2019

TO BE FILLED IN BY
TO BE FILLED IN BY THE EVALUATOR
THE STUDY LEADER

Comments and suggestions Action Taken Refer to

page#

Data Gathering Procedure/Quality

Testing or Performance
Evaluation

Statistical Treatment

Ethical Considerations
(FPIC/Assent form)

REFERENCES

WORK PLAN

BUDGET REQUIREMENT

OTHERS (Results and Discussions) Use n instead of N in the tables.

Conclusion The performance of both groups improved

significantly (This statement can be
strengthened if the significant difference in
the pre-test and post-test scores of the
control group was also established)

3
The Documenter is requested to please email to the consolidated form to both the Proponents(s) and CRE at
urc@usls.edu.ph within 1-2 days after the deliberation.Thank you.
 FORM UPDATED: August 2019

Printed Name and Signature: _______ Date: _____________

PHOTO DOCUMENTATION (Pls. insert 1 or 2 group photos of the deliberation.

4
The Documenter is requested to please email to the consolidated form to both the Proponents(s) and CRE at
urc@usls.edu.ph within 1-2 days after the deliberation.Thank you.