Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Angel IA
Angel IA
Angel IA
Research Question: What is the optimum shape for a hand sanitizer bottle?
1
Rationale
Hand sanitizers have been a product of high demand due to the world’s current pandemic.
As it has been an essential item to purchase in order to maintain hygiene and prevent the spread of
the COVID-19 virus, hand sanitizers have been produced in large amounts, with bottles of varying
shapes and sizes. According to the Wall Street Journal, the rise of hand sanitizer sales has increased
by 600% in 2020.1
Seeing the high increase of hand sanitizer production, with myself as one of the consumers,
has led me to realize the increase of plastic pollution as a result of this product, along with other
plastic packaging. Furthermore, not only is investigating this beneficial to the environment, as
manufacturers could also reduce their production costs by using less plastic to produce these
bottles. Due to this circumstance, I would like to investigate a hand sanitizer bottle shape with
dimensions to obtain a minimum surface area. In order to achieve this, I will investigate a design
that can contain 60 cm3 hand sanitizer bottle and find the dimensions for the smallest surface area,
Introduction
In order to answer the given research question, I will need to find the minimum surface
area of the entire hand sanitizer bottle. The hand sanitizer bottle is a regular 3D shape and the
11
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hand-sanitizer-sales-jumped-600-in-2020-purell-maker-bets-against-a-post-
pandemic-collapse-11611311430
2
I will find the minimum surface area in a 60 cm3 hand sanitizer bottle using the following
procedures:
1. Model the functions of the bottle using two sub-functions and curve-fitting to produce a
single continuous curve that will fit the contour of the bottle
2. Since the surface area function will depend on multiple dimensions, some of these variables
will need to be eliminated in order to determine the surface area. Volume V will be set to
60 cm3, and a formula will be determined for both sub-functions using integration.
3. Derive the formula for the surface area S of the bottle using approximation
4. Plot S against the bottle’s dimensions using matlab, and determine the dimensions suitable
for the minimum surface area.
Discussion
The hand sanitizer bottle was first positioned sideways, and viewed in elevation as depicted
by figure 1.1. The symmetrical line of the bottle was determined as the origin set of Cartesian axes,
where x is considered as the horizontal displacement from the origin, and y, as the vertical
3
displacement from the origin. As the purpose of this study is to optimize the shape of the bottle,
through minimizing the bottle’s surface area, the dimensions of this bottle are given parametrically
instead of numerically.
The continuous piecewise function contains two functions as one is a curve f(x) and the other
linear g(x), which models the bottle, as depicted by the domain x ∈ (-p2, p3) and range y ∈ (r1, r2),
which is the horizontal displacement from the origin, and returns the vertical displacement y from
the origin or the radius of the bottle at the horizontal displacement. The piece-wise function will
be defined by sub-functions of two intervals: x1 ∈ (-P2, 0) for f(x) and x2 ∈ (0, P3) for g(x).
On the interval x2 ∈ (0, P3)= r2, the second sub-function from B to C was approximated simply
as a horizontal line, in which the overall shape of that segment is considered as a cylinder, with
function g (x) = r2, where x2 ∈ (0, p3), and the horizontal line from the origin to point B (0, r2)
will be treated as equivalent to the bottle’s radius. However, through this, the bottle’s bottom part,
which forms a curve at the end of the graph, will not be considered, and therefore the final volume
of the bottle will be larger than expected. Meanwhile, for the first sub-function from point A to B,
with origin x1 ∈ (-P2, 0), it is a curve, that can be considered as either a sinusoidal, logistic, or
parabolic function.
To model the curve f(x), there are numerous curve types to choose from, such as the sinusoidal
logistic, and parabolic curve. However, given that the curve modelled has extreme points, I will
evaluate each of these choices, and find which one is most suitable.
This curve may have been fitting for a sin function, as it has the minimum point as coordinate
A, and the maximum point at coordinate B. However, it does not have a saddle-point which is a
4
The next choice was a logistic function, which can be a good consideration, however, this
curve shows that after the coordinate B, the function will form a straight line, meanwhile, logistic
functions continue with a curve. Therefore, I eliminated the logistic function as well.
I selected a parabolic function to model the bottle parametrically, using the formula
f (x) = ax2 + bx + c. However, I simplified this function, as the maximum and minimum values,
or the information of the extreme points is known. or it can be simplified as f (x) = a (x – xe)2 +
ye, where a refers to the coefficient for the function’s concavity, xe refers to the extreme or
maximum point of the abscissa, and ye refers to the extreme or maximum point of the ordinate.
Therefore, in order to find the function of this parabola, the function’s concavity coefficient, a, by
f (x) = a (x – xe)2 + ye
These values can be substituted, using the coordinates for the maximum point of f(x)
which is point B (0, r2). Therefore xe, is substituted with 0 and ye is substituted with r2 e. Thus,
f (x) = a (x – 0)2 + r2
f (x) = ax2 + r2
Then, in order to find the value of a, f (x) and x, can be substituted by the coordinates
r1 = ap22+ r2
𝑟1 − 𝑟2
=𝑎
𝑝22
5
𝑟1 − 𝑟2 2
𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑥 + 𝑟2
𝑝22
In order to find the overall volume formula for both sub-functions, first sub-function will be
integrated, using the 3d integration formula, meanwhile the second sub-function will use the
Recalled from the first section, the overall formula of the two sub-function is as follows:
𝑟1 − 𝑟2 2
2 𝑥 + 𝑟2 , 𝑖𝑓 − 𝑝2 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 0
𝑓(𝑥) = { 𝑝2
𝑟2 , 𝑖𝑓 0 < 𝑥 ≤ 𝑝3
To find the formula for the first sub-function, it must first be integrated. The formula for
this is
𝑥1
𝑉 = 𝜋 ∫ 𝑓 2 (𝑥)𝑑𝑥
𝑥0
Therefore, I will use the function that I have previously found into this formula, which
gives:
0 2
𝑟1 − 𝑟2
𝑉1 = 𝜋 ∫ ( 2 𝑥 2 + 𝑟2 ) 𝑑𝑥
𝑝2
−𝑝2
To solve this equation, the parameters must be manually integrated, using the following
steps:
6
0
𝑉1 = 𝜋 ∫ 𝑎2 𝑥 4 + 2𝑎𝑟2 𝑥 2 + 𝑟22 𝑑𝑥
−𝑝2
𝑎2 5 2𝑎𝑟2 3 𝑥=0
𝑉1 = 𝜋 [ 𝑥 + 𝑥 + 𝑟22 𝑥]
5 3 𝑥 = −𝑝 2
𝑎2 2𝑎𝑟2
𝑉1 = 0 − 𝜋 ( (−𝑝2 )5 + (−𝑝2 )3 + 𝑟22 (−𝑝2 ))
5 3
𝑎2 5 2𝑎𝑟2 3
𝑉1 = 𝜋 ( 𝑝2 + 𝑝 + 𝑟22 𝑝2 )
5 3 2
𝑎2 2𝑎𝑟2
term 1 being 𝑝25, term 2 being 𝑝23 and term 3 being 𝑟22 𝑝2.
5 3
2𝑎𝑟2 3 2 𝑟1 − 𝑟2
𝑝 = ( 2 ) 𝑟2 𝑝23
3 2 3 𝑝2
2𝑎𝑟2 3 2
𝑝 = (𝑟 𝑟 − 𝑟22 )𝑝2
3 2 3 12
1 2
𝑉1 = 𝜋 ( (𝑟12 − 2𝑟1 𝑟2 + 𝑟22 )𝑝2 + (𝑟1 𝑟2 − 𝑟22 )𝑝2 + 𝑟22 𝑝2 )
5 3
1 2 1 2 2
𝑉1 = 𝜋𝑝2 ( 𝑟12 − 𝑟1 𝑟2 + 𝑟22 + 𝑟1 𝑟2 − 𝑟22 + 𝑟22 )
5 5 5 3 3
7
1 4 8
𝑉1 = 𝜋𝑝2 ( 𝑟12 + 𝑟1 𝑟2 + 𝑟22 )
5 15 15
𝜋𝑝2
𝑉1 = (3𝑟1 + 4𝑟1 𝑟2 + 8𝑟22 )
2
15
Meanwhile the volume formula for g(x) or the second sub-function uses the formula of the
V=πr2h
These values will be substituted by the given parameters, where the radius is r2 and the
𝑉2 = 𝜋𝑟22 𝑝3
𝑉 = 𝑉1 + 𝑉2
π 2 4𝜋 8𝜋 2
𝑉= 𝑟1 𝑝2 + 𝑟1 𝑟2 𝑝2 + 𝑟 𝑝 + 𝜋𝑟22 𝑝3
5 15 15 2 2
π
V1,= 𝑝 (3𝑟12 + 4𝑟1 𝑟2 + 8𝑟22 ) consist of 3 parameters which are. 𝑝2 , 𝑟1 , 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟2 . It enclosed
15 2
V2= 𝜋𝑟22 𝑝3 simply a volume of a cylinder and it consist of 2 parameters i.e. 𝑝3 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑟2 . It
While finding the surface area for the second sub-function could use the surface area
formula for a cylinder, the first sub-function will need to use approximation. The formula for
8
0
When I tried to formulate the surface area for this segment I found a complicated integration.
2
√1 + (𝑓 ′ (𝑥)) = √1 + (2𝑎𝑥 + 𝑟2 )2
substitution, but the final result will not be able to have a closed form expression. So, I decided to
simplify the model using linear fitting, joining point 𝐴(−𝑝2 , 𝑟1 ) and point 𝐵(0 , 𝑟2 ).
To find the functions connecting point A and point B, the functions were then
approximated, where
2
Varberg, D. E., Purcell, E. J., & Rigdon, S. E. (2014). Calculus early transcendentals. Harlow,
Essex: Pearson.
9
ℎ(𝑥) ≈ 𝑓(𝑥)
ℎ(𝑥) = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐
and the gradient is then found using the x and y coordinates from points A and B.
(𝑟2 − 𝑟1 ) (𝑟2 − 𝑟1 )
𝑚= =
(0 − (−𝑝2 )) 𝑝2
c is then found by substituting the x and y values with the coordinates from Point 𝐵(0 , 𝑟2 )
𝑟2 − 𝑟1
𝑟2 = (0) + 𝑐
𝑝2
𝑐 = 𝑟2
𝑟2 − 𝑟1
ℎ(𝑥) = 𝑥 + 𝑟2
𝑝2
𝑓(𝑥) ≈ ℎ(𝑥) = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑟2
𝑟2 − 𝑟1
𝑓 ′ (𝑥) ≈ ℎ′ (𝑥) = 𝑚 =
𝑝2
𝑆1 = 2𝜋 ∫(𝑚𝑥 + 𝑟2 )√1 + 𝑚2 𝑑𝑥
−𝑝2
Now, the square root part does not contain the variable 𝑥, so it can then be excluded from
integration process.
0
10
𝑚 2 𝑥=0
𝑆1 = 2𝜋√1 + 𝑚2 ( 𝑥 + 𝑟2 𝑥) |
2 𝑥 = −𝑝 2
𝑚 2
𝑆1 = 0 − {2𝜋√1 + 𝑚2 ( 𝑝 − 𝑟2 𝑝2 )}
2 2
𝑚 2
𝑆1 = 2𝜋√1 + 𝑚2 (− 𝑝 + 𝑟2 𝑝2 )
2 2
𝑟2 − 𝑟1 2 1 𝑟2 − 𝑟1 2
𝑆1 = 2𝜋√1 + ( ) (− ( ) 𝑝2 + 𝑟2 𝑝2 )
𝑝2 2 𝑝2
2𝜋 1 1
𝑆1 = √𝑝22 + 𝑟22 − 2𝑟1 𝑟2 + 𝑟12 (− 𝑟2 𝑝2 + 𝑟1 𝑝2 + 𝑟2 𝑝2 )
𝑝2 2 2
2𝜋 1 1
𝑆1 = √𝑝22 + 𝑟22 − 2𝑟1 𝑟2 + 𝑟12 ( 𝑟1 𝑝2 + 𝑟2 𝑝2 )
𝑝2 2 2
2
Canceling
𝑝2
To find the surface area for the second sub-function g(x), the formula of the cylinder’s
surface area is used, 2πrh+2πr2. These values are then substituted with the given parameters, where
S2 = 2𝜋𝑟2 𝑝3 + 𝜋𝑟22
𝑆𝐴 = 𝑆1 + 𝑆2
11
IV. Minimizing the Surface Area
The last step of the investigation was to minimize the surface area, by using the formulas of
π 2 4𝜋 8𝜋 2
𝑉= 𝑟1 𝑝2 + 𝑟1 𝑟2 𝑝2 + 𝑟 𝑝 + 𝜋𝑟22 𝑝3
5 15 15 2 2
Given that the desired volume for the bottle is 60 cm3, therefore, p3 and r2 will be variables
that will be modified, given that they are in the second sub-function of the bottle, which is the
largest part of the bottle, therefore using the most plastic. Meanwhile, the parameters that will be
assumed, using the actual dimensions from the bottle are r1 and p2, in which the values are 1.146
π 2 4𝜋 8𝜋 2
𝑉= 𝑟1 𝑝2 + 𝑟1 𝑟2 𝑝2 + 𝑟 𝑝 + 𝜋𝑟22 𝑝3
5 15 15 2 2
12
A similar method was used for the surface area, where
The graph for the function of the surface area against r2 found to display this surface area is
below.
13
r2 =2.286 cm
SA=74.15 cm2
Then to find the p3 value, the values of the formula can then be substituted using the values
𝑝3 = 2.464
Conclusion
The objective for this investigation was to find the optimum shape for the hand-sanitizer
bottle, by finding the dimensions for the minimum surface area. Therefore, to answer this
The optimum shape for a 60 cm3 hand-sanitizer bottle has the dimensions of
r1= 1.146 cm r2=2.286 cm p2=1.3 cm p3=2.464 cm
These dimensions will give the minimum surface area required to hold 60 cm3 for a bottle with the surface
area of 74.15 cm2
axis
2. The model function for the minimum surface area is a parabolic function
3. The surface area of the bottle’s neck and cap is not included.
Recommendation
If I could re-conduct this experiment in the future, there are several errors which I have
14
The first error, I found was that there was a linearization error in the modelling of my
As it can be seen, the best fit lines for the line before point M, and after point M are uneven.
In order to fix this error, next time I can first find the mid-point of line AB, and later find the line
Another error that was not in line with my investigation was that I only found the surface
area of plastic for the part of the bottle only, and not the cap, although the cap contains plastic as
well. Therefore, in the future, I would also like to find the minimum surface area of both the cap
Lastly, I am aware that this is not the only shape for a hand-sanitizer bottle, as there are
various other shapes for hand-sanitizer bottles, including ones with irregular shapes that are not
cylindrical as the one that I used. Therefore, in the future, I could also find the minimum surface
area for more than just one bottle, and in fact compare which bottle shape is most suitable for a
15
Bibliography
Boucher, C. (2011, March 7). Wolfram demonstrations Project. Retrieved April 09, 2021, from
https://demonstrations.wolfram.com/MinimizingTheSurfaceAreaOfACylinderWithAFixed
Volume/
Extreme value of quadratic function. (2003). Retrieved April 09, 2021, from
https://portal.tpu.ru/SHARED/k/KONVAL/Sites/English_sites/Site3_M/5/5_07_2.htm
Terlep, S. (2021, January 22). Hand sanitizer sales JUMPED 600% in 2020. Purell Maker bets
against A Post-pandemic Collapse. Retrieved April 09, 2021, from
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hand-sanitizer-sales-jumped-600-in-2020-purell-maker-bets-
against-a-post-pandemic-collapse-11611311430
Varberg, D. E., Purcell, E. J., & Rigdon, S. E. (2014). Calculus early transcendentals. Harlow,
Essex: Pearson.
16