Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hushbot Research On Algorithmic Trading
Hushbot Research On Algorithmic Trading
Hushbot Research On Algorithmic Trading
Research By
Siim Laane, Information Systems (Estonian IT College, Tartu)
www.hushbot.com 1
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
Abstract Objectives:
The financial landscape has witnessed a Examine the Transition: The primary
remarkable transition from traditional objective of this research is to examine the
algorithmic trading to the era of Artificial transition from traditional algorithmic
Intelligence (AI) trading since December trading to AI trade. This involves assessing
2021. This research paper explores this the drivers behind this shift and the
profound shift, the transformative changes implications for market participants.
in financial markets following the COVID-
19 pandemic, and the emergence of new, Analyze Post-COVID Market Changes:
AI-driven trading algorithms. Another objective is to analyze the
changes in financial markets after the
Key Findings: COVID-19 pandemic. This includes
assessing shifts in market dynamics,
Transition to AI Trade: The research liquidity, and investor behavior in the
reveals a substantial transition from rule- context of the "new normal."
based algorithmic trading to AI-powered
trading systems. Advanced machine Explore New Trading Algorithms: The
learning models and neural networks are research aims to explore the landscape of
increasingly employed to make real-time new trading algorithms driven by AI and
trading decisions, adapt to market machine learning. It investigates their
dynamics, and optimize strategies. functionality, advantages, and potential
applications in contemporary financial
Market Resilience Post-COVID: The markets.
financial markets have demonstrated
remarkable resilience in the aftermath of In summary, this research paper provides
the COVID-19 pandemic. Investors and valuable insights into the dynamic and
institutions have adapted to new norms, transformative changes occurring in
leveraging technology to enhance market financial markets, driven by the shift from
stability and liquidity. algo trade to AI trade. It also highlights the
adaptability of markets in response to
AI-Powered Algorithms: New trading unprecedented global events, such as the
algorithms infused with AI techniques COVID-19 pandemic, and the potential of
have shown promising results. These AI-driven algorithms to shape the future of
algorithms are characterized by their trading.
ability to process vast datasets, detect
subtle market patterns, and execute trades
with precision, contributing to improved
trading outcomes.
www.hushbot.com 2
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
algorithmic trading.
www.hushbot.com 3
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
www.hushbot.com 4
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
www.hushbot.com 5
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
Methodology:
Data Analysis:
Research Methods for Analyzing
Quantitative Analysis: We employed
the Shift from Algo Trade to AI
statistical methods to analyze the market
Trade: data, focusing on the periods before and
after the transition to AI trade. This
Our research on the transition from analysis included volatility assessments,
traditional algorithmic trading (algo trade) liquidity measurements, and comparative
to AI trade is underpinned by a studies of trading strategies.
multifaceted methodological approach that
combines quantitative and qualitative Machine Learning Models: To assess the
analyses. This approach enables us to impact of AI on trading outcomes, we
comprehensively investigate the complex developed machine learning models that
dynamics of this transformation. Here's an simulated trading scenarios. These models
in-depth overview of our research incorporated historical market data and AI-
methods: driven trading strategies, allowing us to
evaluate performance under various
Data Collection: market conditions.
Market Data: We collected extensive Content Analysis: Qualitative data from
historical market data encompassing expert interviews underwent content
trading volumes, price movements, bid-ask analysis, identifying recurring themes and
spreads, and asset correlations. This insights regarding the practical challenges
dataset spans various asset classes, and opportunities associated with AI trade.
including equities, fixed income, and
cryptocurrencies, to provide a holistic view Comparative Studies:
of the transition.
Benchmarking: We benchmarked AI-
AI Adoption Metrics: To gauge the driven trading systems against traditional
adoption of AI in trading, we sourced data algo trading systems, comparing factors
from reputable industry reports, financial such as risk-adjusted returns, drawdowns,
institutions, and market participants. This and execution speed.
included information on AI trading system
deployments, market share, and Market Impact Analysis: We assessed the
technology adoption trends. market impact of AI adoption by
examining factors such as order book
Expert Interviews: We conducted dynamics, liquidity provision, and price
structured interviews with experts in the discovery efficiency.
field, including traders, quantitative
analysts, and technology specialists, to Research Methods for Analyzing
gain qualitative insights into the practical Changes in the Market After COVID-19:
implications of AI adoption in trading.
www.hushbot.com 6
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
www.hushbot.com 7
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
www.hushbot.com 8
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
www.hushbot.com 9
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
of the stocks as the trading procedure was return advance over time in conformity to
quicker. With the introduction of a stochastic process, which means that
algorithmic trading, you can design an stock markets are very random. This is
algorithm that will command the a very useful presumption which is at
computer to sell or buy individual stocks the disposition of all the derivatives
when predefined conditions are met (Moy pricing models and other security
das, 2019). Algorithmic trading can help to valuation models. Fundamentally most
trade at a very high speed and recurrence, of the quantitative financial models
which is impossible for a human trader remonstrate that the returns of any
to carry out. Algorithmic trading given financial security are persuaded
platforms usually consist of four different by one or more market risk
main components that are the trade circumstances. The level to which these
execution handler, data handler, The risk factors emancipate market returns is
model component, and the strategy. The known as price sensitivity. For instance, a
four main components which are used well-assorted portfolio's market returns
to run the algo-trading platform are may be determined by the fluctuations
discussed in detail below. in foreign exchange rates, Markets short-
term rates, and the returns in the stock
The model component of market. These factors can be calculated
historically and can be used to develop a
Algorithmic trading: model that reproduces what those risk
factors can do and can predict what the
The model component of Algorithmic returns on that particular portfolio might
trading is the depiction of the outside be.
world as the algorithmic trading system
perceives it. The financial models that are
developed usually tend to constitute how Changes in the Market After
the algo-trading system considers the COVID-19:
market works (Moy das, 2019). The
fundamental goal of these financial models The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic
is to create interpretations about the in late 2019 triggered a seismic shift in the
world and, in this case, the financial global financial landscape. This section
markets. Financial markets can be conducts a comprehensive analysis of the
structured using numerous methods and transformative changes that have defined
techniques. Still, all the financial models financial markets in the post-COVID-19
are doing just one thing, depleting a era, including shifts in market volatility,
complicated system into a manageable liquidity, and investor behavior.
set of rules which illustrates the Additionally, we explore the pivotal role
behaviour of that system under a played by technology and automation in
different sequence of events. The adapting to the "new normal."
conventional methods include decision
trees, frizzy logic techniques, neural Market Volatility and Dynamics:
networks, mathematical models, and
induction rule sets. The practice of Extreme Volatility: The pandemic's initial
employing mathematical models to wave brought unparalleled volatility to
illustrate the performance of stock financial markets. Stock indices
markets is known as quantitative experienced rapid declines, followed by
Finance. Most of the models in sharp recoveries. Volatility, as measured
quantitative finance work on the intrinsic by indices like the VIX, surged to historic
presumption that the market prices and the levels, reflecting heightened market
www.hushbot.com 10
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
uncertainty.
Retail Trading Surge: The pandemic saw a
Intraday Price Swings: Intraday price surge in retail trading, with individual
swings became more pronounced as news investors using online platforms to engage
about the pandemic unfolded. Algorithms in stock trading and options trading. The
designed to respond to real-time data faced "Robinhood effect" exemplified this trend.
significant challenges in adapting to
rapidly changing market conditions. Long-Term Investing: Some investors
reevaluated their strategies, emphasizing
Sectoral Variations: Certain sectors, such long-term investing and ESG
as technology and healthcare, (Environmental, Social, Governance)
demonstrated resilience and even growth, considerations. The pandemic highlighted
while others, like travel and hospitality, the importance of resilient and sustainable
faced severe downturns. This divergence investments.
led to sector rotation strategies and
thematic investing. Technology and Automation in the
"New Normal":
Liquidity and Trading Patterns:
Remote Work and Digitization: Financial
Liquidity Squeeze: During the initial phase institutions swiftly embraced remote work
of the pandemic, liquidity in some asset arrangements, accelerating digitization
classes, particularly corporate bonds and efforts. The adoption of cloud-based
emerging markets, contracted technologies, digital collaboration tools,
significantly. Investors rushed to safety, and virtual trading floors became integral
leading to disruptions in the functioning of to business continuity.
certain markets.
Algorithmic Trading Adaptation:
Central Bank Interventions: Central banks Algorithmic trading strategies adapted to
globally responded with unprecedented the changing landscape, emphasizing risk
monetary policy measures, injecting management, sentiment analysis, and
liquidity through asset purchases and volatility-based algorithms.
interest rate cuts. This influx of liquidity
calmed markets and provided support for AI-Driven Analytics: AI and machine
risk assets. learning technologies were harnessed to
analyze vast datasets, enabling traders and
Shift to Electronic Trading: Electronic investors to identify trends and anticipate
trading platforms witnessed increased market moves.
adoption as traders sought efficient and
contactless ways to execute trades. This Regulatory Considerations: Regulators
shift accelerated the adoption of grappled with the challenges posed by
automation and algorithmic trading. remote trading and digital adoption.
Cybersecurity, market surveillance, and
Investor Behavior and Sentiment: regulatory technology (RegTech) gained
prominence.
Flight to Safety: Investors flocked to safe-
haven assets, including government bonds In conclusion, the post-COVID-19 era has
and gold, reflecting risk aversion. This reshaped financial markets in profound
flight to safety persisted throughout the ways. Extreme volatility, liquidity
early stages of the pandemic. challenges, shifts in investor behavior, and
www.hushbot.com 11
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
www.hushbot.com 12
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
www.hushbot.com 13
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
www.hushbot.com 14
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
www.hushbot.com 15
HUSHBOT RESEARCH PAPER
Friday, 17 December 2021
Education and Training: Investigate the Menkveld, A. J., & Zoican, M. A. (2017).
educational and training needs of Need for Speed? Exchange Latency and
professionals entering the AI trade space. Liquidity. The Review of Financial
Develop comprehensive programs to equip Studies, 30(4), 1188-1228.
individuals with the skills to navigate AI-
driven financial markets effectively. Nanda, V., Narasimhan, A., & Seyhun, H.
N. (2018). Why Do Institutional Investors
In conclusion, the transition from algo Chase Return Performance? Journal of
trade to AI trade is an evolutionary leap in Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(1),
the financial industry. It presents 175-203.
opportunities for efficiency and innovation
but also poses complex challenges related Zhang, X., & Russell, J. R. (2020).
to ethics, regulation, and risk management. Algorithmic Trading. In The Palgrave
By continuing to study this transformation Handbook of Corporate Sustainability in
and its multifaceted implications, we can the Digital Era (pp. 509-540). Palgrave
pave the way for a more resilient, Macmillan.
transparent, and equitable financial
landscape in the AI-driven era. Zheng, Y., & Tsyvinski, A. (2019). The
Economic Impact of Machine Learning.
References: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,
50(2), 1-54.
Chaboud, A., Chiquoine, B., Hjalmarsson,
E., & Vega, C. (2021). Rise of the Zohren, S., Roberts, S. J., & Shanahan, M.
Machines: Algorithmic Trading in the (2018). A Survey of Deep Learning for
Foreign Exchange Market. The Journal of Scientific Discovery. arXiv preprint
Finance, 76(4), 1815-1859. arXiv:1803.01729.
Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Zhu, H., & Lesmond, D. (2018). Trading
Weber, B. W. (2018). On the Fintech Fast and Slow: Colocation and Liquidity.
Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Review of Financial Studies, 31(5), 1874-
Innovation, Disruption, and 1912.
Transformation in Financial Services.
Journal of Management Information
Systems, 35(1), 220-265.
www.hushbot.com 16