COURSE COMMITTEE MEETING (CCM)-I

Course Code & Name 18ECC208J&MICROPROCESSOR AND MICROCONTROLLER

Academic Year 2022 - 2023 CCM Date 28.12.2022
Semester IV CCM Venue Optical Laboratory

Members Present:

Position in the Course

S.No. Name and Designation Signature
Committee
1. Dr.K.Sivanandam, Assistant Professor Course Coordinator
2. Dr.E.Dinesh, Assistant Professor Course Instructor
3. Mr.S.Arunprathap, Assistant Professor Course Instructor
4. Ms.S.Kavitha, Assistant Professor Course Instructor

Minutes (Points discussed and decisions taken)

1. Discussion about Course Outcomes

CO 1 Experiment with 8086 Microprocessor (K3)

CO 2 Identify Appropriate interfacing in Microprocessor application (K3)

CO 3 Make use of 8051 Microcontroller based systems for various ALP Design (K3)

CO 4 Construct various Interfacing circuits for Microcontrollers (K3)

CO 5 Interpret the architectural features of MSP430 (K2)

2. Discussion about CO attainment analysis of previous batch for this course

Action Proposed
CO Attainmen Modification target were
COs CO Target to bridge the
attainment t Gap achieved
gap
CO1
CO2
CO3
CO4
CO5
 3. Preparation of Lesson Plan
Lesson Plan will prepare before the commencement of class

4. Preparation of Assessment Plan

Test Test No. Portion for Test Planned Date

I Unit 1 and Unit 2 20.02.2023

Mid Term Test
II Unit 3 and Unit 4 27.03.2023
Preparatory Exam I Unit 1 to 5 02.05.2023

Assignment:
Practice worksheet with answer will be prepared before the commencement of the class.

Cognitive Level

Cognitive Preparatory
Midsem-I Midsem-II Assignment
Level Test

Remember    
Understand    
Apply    
Analyze - - - -
Evaluate - - - -
Create - - - -

5. Preparation of Course Materialand question bank:

Course Material and question bank will be prepared before the commencement of class
6. Books to be followed by the students

1 Yu-Cheng Liu, Glenn A.Gibson, “Microcomputer Systems: The 8086 / 8088 Family -Architecture, Programming and Design”, Second Edition, Prentice Hall of
India, 2007.

2 Mohamed Ali Mazidi, Janice GillispieMazidi, RolinMcKinlay , “The 8051 Microcontroller and Embedded Systems: Using Assembly and C”, Second Edition,
Pearson education,2011.

3 Chris Nagy, Embedded Systems Design Using the TI MSP430 Series, Newnes publisher, 2003.

4 Kenneth Ayala, "The Microcontroller Architecture - Programming and Applications", 3rd Edition, Cengage Learning,2004.

5 N. Senthil Kumar, M. Saravanan, S. Jeevananthan “Microprocessors and Microcontrollers”, 2nd Edition, Oxford Higher Education, 2018.

7. Mapping of course outcomes with Program outcomes

POs PSOs
COs PO PO PO
PO1 PO3 PO4 PO6 PO7 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
2 5 8
CO1 3 3 3 - 3 - - 1 3 1 - - 3 3
CO2 3 3 3 - 3 - - - 3 - - 1 3 3
CO3 3 3 3 - 3 - - - 3 - - - 3 3
CO4 3 3 3 - 3 - - - 3 - - 1 3 3
CO5 3 1 1 - - - - 1 2 1 - - 3 3
CO
3 2.6 2.6 - 3 - 1 3 1 - 1 3 3
(Avg)

8. Assessment tools planned to assess all course outcomes

Course Assessment Tool with weightage
Outcome Midsem1 Midsem2 Preparatory Assignment Laboratory
CO1 10 10 10 20
CO2 10 10 10 20
CO3 10 10 10 20
CO4 10 10 10 20
CO5 10 20 20
9. Planning about the innovative learning methods if possible
Title of the Topic CO Methodologies
Assembly Language Programming in 8086 CO1 Think, Pair and Share

Addressing modes in 8086 CO1 Pick and Identify

Assembly Language Programming in 8051 CO3 Collaborative learning

Addressing modes in 8051 CO3 Pick and Identify

Instruction set CO5 Collaborative learning

10. Expected CO target for all course outcomes

COs Course Outcome Target
CO1 Experiment with 8086 Microprocessor (K3)
CO2 Identify Appropriate interfacing in Microprocessor application (K3)
Make use of 8051 Microcontroller based systems for various ALP Design
CO3
(K3)
CO4 Construct various Interfacing circuits for Microcontrollers (K3)
CO5 Interpret the architectural features of MSP430 (K2)

The target for the course outcome is given below:

Attainment Level 1: If the CO attainment is below 60%

Attainment Level 2: If the CO attainment is 60% to 69%

Attainment Level 3: If the CO attainment is 70% and above

Prepared by: Approved by:

Dr.K.Sivanandam HoD/ECE
 COURSE COMMITTEE MEETING (CCM) - II

Course Code & Name 18ECE001JT & VLSI Design

Academic Year 2021 - 2022 CCM Date 28.04.2022
Semester Sixth CCM Venue Optical Laboratory

Members Present:

Position in the Course

S.No. Name and Designation Signature
Committee
1 Dr.C.Vivek, Associate Professor Course Coordinator
2 Dr.K.Sivanandam, Associate Professor Course Instructor

Minutes (Points discussed and decisions taken)

1. Review of Question paper with cognitive levels &students' performance

Mid Sem – I (50 Marks)
Cognitive Level
CO1 CO5
Remember 10 4
Understand 15 2
Apply - 19
Analyze - -
Evaluate - -
Create - -

Pass % in Mid Sem- I:

A section: 19/28=67.86%
Bsection: 10/31 = 32.26%
Csection: 12/25 = 48%
 D section: 10/36 = 27.78%

2. Impact analysis of Innovative Teaching Methodologies adopted (if any)

Activity 1:
Topic: Stick diagram
Name of the innovative Activity: Video Lecture
The students were understanding the concepts clearly, so that students were known about
the different layers which is used to design a CMOS logic circuits

Activity 2:
Topic:Full adder circuit design by EDA playground platform
Name of the innovative Activity: Hands on teaching method
The students were able to write the verilog code through online tool. Students are well
known about the availability of various online tools in pandemic period

3. Identification mechanism of weak/ bright students and follow-up mechanism

66 students are identified as weak students based on the arrear andMidSem - I performance
(below 50%). Remedial classes planned for the weak students.

54 students are identified as bright students based on the CGPA and MidSem - I performance
(above 50%).

Prepared by:Dr.C.Vivek&Dr.K.Sivanandam Approved by:

Date: 28-04-2022 Date:

 COURSE COMMITTEE MEETING (CCM) - III

Course Code & Name 18ECE001JT & VLSI Design

Academic Year 2021 - 2022 CCM Date 30.05.2022
Semester Sixth CCM Venue Optical Laboratory

Members Present:

Position in the Course

S.No. Name and Designation Signature
Committee
1 Dr.C.Vivek, Associate Professor Course Coordinator
2 Dr.K.Sivanandam, Associate Professor Course Instructor

Minutes (Points discussed and decisions taken)

1. Review of Question paper with cognitive levels &students' performance

MidSem – II (50 Marks)

Cognitive Level
CO2 CO3
Remember 10 10
Understand 15 15
Apply - -
Analyze - -
Evaluate - -
Create - -

Pass % in MidSem- II:

A section: 29/28 = 89.29%
B section: 19/31 = 61.29%
Csection: 21/25 = 84%
D section: 29/36 = 80.56%
2. Impact analysis of Innovative Teaching Methodologies adopted (if any)

3. Progress of weak / bright students and follow-up mechanism

Exams are conducted through online (MCQ pattern). Class test and remedial class are
conducted for slow learners.

4. Preparation of Assignment Questions if any

Individual assignment will be given in CO2

Prepared by: Approved by:

Date: Date:
 COURSE COMMITTEE MEETING (CCM) - IV

Course Code & Name 18ECE001JT & VLSI Design

Academic Year 2021 - 2022 CCM Date 22.02.2022
Semester Sixth CCM Venue Optical Laboratory

Members Present:

Position in the Course

S.No. Name and Designation Signature
Committee
1 Dr.C.Vivek, Associate Professor Course Coordinator
2 Dr.K.Sivanandam, Associate Professor Course Instructor

Minutes (Points discussed and decisions taken)

1. Review of preparatory and End semester Question paper &students' performance
Cognitive Preparatory
Level CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5
Remember 4 2 - 2 2
Understand 32 34 36 34 18
Apply - - - - 16
Analyze - - - - -
Evaluate - - - - -
Create - - - - -

Pass % inpreparatory:
A section: 19/28 = 67.86%
B section: 24/31 = 77.42%
Csection: 23/25 = 92%
D section: 26/36 = 72.22%
  End semester question paper was discussed and reviewed.
Cognitive End Semester
Level CO1 CO2 CO3 CO4 CO5
Remember 4 10 4 4
Understand 32 18 4
Apply 8
Analyze - - - - -
Evaluate - - - - -
Create - - - - -

2. Impact analysis of Innovative Teaching Methodologies adopted if any

NA
3. Curriculum Feedback Analysis by the studentFeedback on VLSI Design given by the
students is discussed. Based on the feedback, suggestions for the improvement are proposed.

4. Overall CO attainment for the course &Suggestion for the Improvement for the next batch
Action Proposed
CO Attainmen Modification target were
COs CO Target to bridge the
attainment t Gap achieved
gap
CO1 65.00 81.88 16.88 Increase the target to 70%
CO2 65.00 85.36 20.36 Increase the target to 70%
CO3 70.00 85.89 15.89 Increase the target to 72%
CO4 65.00 79.01 14.01 Increase the target to 70%
CO5 70.00 83.49 13.49 Increase the target to 72%

Prepared by: Approved by:

Date: Date: