Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HRM623-SG V6
HRM623-SG V6
www.bmtcollege.ac.za
*SAQA equates one credit with ten notional hours of study. Credits include all studies related to this
module, including prescribed and recommended research, assignments and work-related projects if
required. Credits will only be granted upon successful completion of the full programme.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.2 THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT (OHSA) NO. 85 OF 1993
......................................................................................................................... 2
1.2.2 The roles, functions and legal duties of the employer ...................................... 5
1.2.4 Duties of Health and Safety Representatives are specified under section 18 of
the OHSA. ....................................................................................................... 6
1.2.6 The Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act applies to: ..... 6
2.2.1 HIV/AIDS in the workplace affects the organisation in the following way: ...... 20
3.2.1 This force field system consists of three stages to describe the process of
organisational change: ................................................................................... 58
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1: Example of an appointment letter for a health and safety representative .. 4
Table 1.2: Example of Acceptance of Appointment .................................................... 4
Table 1.3: Extract from the National Institute for Health Care Reform’s website:
Employer wellness initiatives grow, but effectiveness varies widely (cassil, 2010) .. 11
Table 2.1: Estimated number of people receiving ARTs (2005-2010) ...................... 23
Table 2.2: HIV prevalence (2002-2017) ................................................................... 24
Table 2.3: Extract EEA (1998) Code of Good Practice on Hiv and Aids and the world
of work...................................................................................................................... 36
Table 2.4: Example of an organisation’s hiv/aids policy ........................................... 44
Table 3.1: Other recommended reading................................................................... 72
Please note that you do not need to purchase any of the new editions of the textbooks
if you already purchased a previous edition. The content of the textbooks remains the
same unless otherwise specified.
Erasmus, B.J., Schenk, H.W., Tshilongamulenzhe, M.C. & Swanepoel, B.J. (ed).
(2014). South African Human Resource Management Theory and Practice (5th ed.).
Cape Town: Juta.
ISBN 978-1-48510-207-6
OR
Erasmus, B., Schenk, H., Mulaudzi, M. & Grobler, A. (2019). South African Human
Resource Management: Theory and Practice (6th ed.). Cape Town: Juta.
ISBN 978-1-48513-009-3
ISBN 978-1-4737-5112-5
OR
Warnich, S., Carrell, M.R., Elbert, N.F. & Hatfield, R.D. (2022). Human Resource
Management in South Africa (7th ed.). Hampshire: Cengae Learning EMEA.
ISBN 978-4737-7941-9
Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A., Odendaal, A. & Roodt, G. (2013). Global and South
African Perspectives: Organisational Behaviour (2nded.). Cape Town: Pearson
Education.
OR
Formative - Module 1
(HR Planning and Administration III)
Formative - Module 3
(HR Planning and Administration III)
Formative - Module 4
(Organisational Behaviour III)
Formative - Module 5
(Organisational Behaviour III)
Formative - Module 6
(Organisational Behaviour III)
Formative - Module 7
(Labour and Industrial Relations III)
Formative - Module 8
(Labour and Industrial Relations III)
1.2 THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT (OHSA) NO. 85 OF 1993
......................................................................................................................... 2
• Argue a case for moving from narrow health and safety compliance focus to a
holistic approach of ‘well-being at work and beyond’, and describe the role of
different role players and stakeholders in this regards;
In this chapter we discuss the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA) No. 85 of
1993 and the Mine Health and Safety Act No. 29 of 1996. The Occupational Injuries
and Diseases Act, No. 130 of 1993 regulates the payment of compensation to persons
who are injured or who contract a disease while working. The Occupational Health
and Safety Act lays down certain rules aimed at preventing accidents at work.
Legal compliance with health and safety legislation does not depend on the size of the
organisation. Every organisation must comply. The legislation that you must comply
with, depends on the type of industry that you are operating in.
Note that all mines and quarries must comply with the Mine Health and Safety Act and
all other businesses must comply with the OHSA.
The Occupational Health and Safety Act (1993) of South Africa, requires the employer
to bring about and maintain, as far as reasonably practicable, a work environment that
is safe and without risk to the Health and Safety of the workers. This means that the
employer must ensure that the workplace is free of hazardous substances, such as
benzene, chlorine and micro-organisms, articles, equipment, and processes that may
cause occupational injury, damage, disease or ill health.
Where this is not possible, the employer must inform workers of the hazards and risks
present in the workplace. The employer must also educate employees on how to
prevent certain hazards, and how to ensure a safe work environment. Protective
measures should be in place to ensure a safer workplace.
Note that the Occupational Health Safety Act does not expect of the employer to take
sole responsibility for Health and Safety in the workplace. The Act is based on the
principle that hazards and risks in the workplace must be addressed by communication
and cooperation between the employer and the employees. The employer and
employees must share the responsibility for Health and Safety in the workplace and
work together to address and eliminate all hazards and risks. Both parties must pro-
actively participate to identify dangers and develop control measures to make the
workplace safe.
The employer and the workers are required by the Occupational Health and Safety act
to be involved in a system where Health and Safety representatives may inspect the
workplace regularly and then report to a Health and Safety committee. The Health and
Safety committee must in turn make recommendations to the employer about the
improvement of Health and Safety in the workplace.
To ensure that this system works, every worker must know his or her rights and duties
as contained in the Act.
1.2.1.1 The purpose of the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA)
• The health and safety of persons at work and those in connection with the use of
plant and machinery;
• The protection of other persons from hazards to health and safety caused by the
activities of the persons at work; and
• The CEO must appoint health and safety representatives in terms of section
16(2) of the OHSA. This appointment must be formalised in the form of a letter.
I, XXX confirm that I have read and understood the appointment as set out above.
I, XXX confirm that I have read and understood the appendices and confirm my
intention to comply with all the legal requirements.
I, XXX confirm that I have received training in the assigned responsibilities and
duties required of me.
Signed: Date:
Designation:
• The employer must comply with the intent of the legislation by creating and
maintaining a safe and healthy workplace as far as is “reasonably practicable”.
Refer to the OHSA for definitions and explanations.
• Eliminating hazards;
• Ensuring that the requirement of the Act are complied with by all employees;
• To take care of their own health and safety, as well as that of other persons who
may be affected by their actions or negligence to act.
• Wear the prescribed safety clothing or use the prescribed safety equipment
where required;
You may now wish to refer to your textbook to read up on these duties.
The aim of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases Act is to provide
for compensation for disablement caused by occupational injuries or diseases
sustained or contracted by employees in the course of their employment, or for
death resulting from such injuries or diseases; and to provide for matters connected
therewith (such as medical expenses etc.)
• Workers who are totally or partially disabled for less than 3 days;
• Domestic workers;
• Members of –
• Any worker guilty of willful misconduct, unless they are seriously disabled or
killed;
• Anyone employed outside the RSA for 12 or more continuous months; and
• Workers working mainly outside the RSA and only temporarily employed in the
RSA.
If you believe that your injury or illness was sustained while you were on duty, you are
unlikely to have a claim against your employer, but will be able to claim from the
Compensation Commissioner (for COIDA.) The Department of Labour of the South
African Government is responsible for administering the Compensation of injured
workers in terms of COIDA.
The purpose of the Mine Health and Safety Act is to provide for protection of the health
and safety of employees and other persons at mines and, for that purpose to:
• Give effect to the public international law obligations of the Republic relating to
mining health and safety and to provide for matters connected therewith.
Employees in the mining industry who are injured in the performance of their duties or
who suffer from occupational diseases are compensated in terms of the Occupational
Diseases in Mines and Works Act (ODMWA) in a similar manner to which workers in
other industries are compensated in terms of COIDA.
According to Nel et al. (2012) employee care embraces attention to the personal,
social and financial problems of individual workers. It is a function of human resource
management to concern itself with the general welfare of the people who are employed
in the organisation.
Most people generally agree that the primary objectives of an effective wellness
programme are to prevent disease, decrease health risks, and contain rising health
care costs.
While this definition has stood the test of time, it doesn’t capture the many emerging
developments within the wellness field today. Health and wellness programmes are
becoming more sophisticated, more specialised, and more targeted to specific
populations.
Michael Mulvihill, the president of Leade Health, Inc., a vendor of wellness services in
proposes a more current definition of wellness, health promotion, and disease
prevention, as follows:
Nel et al. (2012) point out that problems at home or in the community as well as
financial troubles are transferred to the work environment and impact generally
negatively upon it. Employee Assistance Programmes (EAPs) should therefore be set
up to assist employees with personal problems such as stress, alcoholism,
depression, money management etc.
Many organisations that provide EAPs for their employees are motivated by the
knowledge that a supportive workplace is a vital component in returning problematic
employees to a healthy and productive life.
While employer wellness programs have spread rapidly in recent years, few
employers implement programs likely to make a meaningful difference in
employees’ health—customised, integrated, comprehensive, diversified
programmes strongly linked to a firm’s business strategy and strongly championed
by senior leadership and managers throughout the company. Employers that lack
the ability and commitment to support a comprehensive wellness programme may
be wiser to stay on the sidelines, according to experts interviewed for a new
qualitative research study from the Centre for Studying Health System Change
(HSC). Most experts believe substantial financial incentives are essential to
achieving strong employee participation. However, there are compelling
exceptions—companies that opt not to pay for wellness participation yet achieve
strong buyin and improved outcomes. Return on investment for wellness initiatives
is uncertain, particularly for one-size-fits-all programmes purchased from vendors
with little direct employer involvement. Measuring impact has many challenges—
one key challenge is that wellness programmes are seldom implemented without
concurrent benefit design changes, so isolating the impact of wellness interventions
alone may not be possible.
But soon they realise that employees are only about 40% of the health care cost, so
if they want to improve health care costs, they have to get to dependents.” Several
companies with highly regarded wellness programmes for employees have
struggled with how to expand the programmes successfully to employees’ families.
As one wellness executive said, “I haven’t figured out how to reach families without
spending just a ton of money and energy. I don’t know how to reach spouses and
dependents efficiently and well.”
Accurately measuring the impact of a wellness programme is one of the most difficult
challenges facing employers. Respondents observed that there is no single industry
standard for measuring return on investment (ROI) on wellness programmes. Two
types of ROI are typically estimated: “hard ROI,” which measures savings in direct
medical costs only, and “soft ROI,” which also includes productivity gains from such
factors as reduced absenteeism. Several years ago, it was not uncommon for
wellness vendors to “make extravagant ROI claims (in the region of 5:1) to market
their wellness programmes—claims they weren’t able to deliver on,” according to an
expert. The result was disillusionment by some early adopters in the employer
community.
Key Takeaways
Among the common themes that emerged from interviews with industry experts and
especially with employers sponsoring wellness programmes, the following stand
out:
• Programmes that are comprehensive, integrated and diversified stand the best
chance of success: Behaviour modification programmes offered in isolation
don’t have a strong track record. Participants who quit smoking or lose weight
often revert to former behaviours. Without broader interventions to change the
work environment and promote a culture of health, wellness programmes are
unlikely to make a lasting impact. Because most employers have diverse
workforces and because individual needs and preferences differ, wellness
programmes work best when they span a wide range of activities.
• Most believe financial incentives are essential, but compelling exceptions exist:
The consensus in the wellness industry was that substantial cash incentives
are needed to achieve strong participation, and these incentives should be
designed to incrementally reward discrete activities that improve or maintain
health. However, some employers operate successful programmes with
minimal or no cash rewards attached and believe such rewards to be
counterproductive in causing employees to focus on the incentive rather than
The HIV/AIDS
Challenge
IN THIS CHAPTER
• AIDS: is the acronym for "acquired immune deficiency syndrome". AIDS is the
clinical definition given to the onset of certain life-threatening infections in
persons whose immune systems have ceased to function properly as a result of
infection with HIV.
• HIV testing: taking a medical test to determine a person’s HIV status. This may
include written or verbal questions inquiring about previous HIV tests; questions
related to the assessment of ‘risk behaviour’ (for example questions regarding
sexual practices, the number of sexual partners or sexual orientation); and any
other indirect methods designed to ascertain an employee’s or job applicant’s
HIV status.
• HIV: is the acronym for "human immuno deficiency virus". HIV is a virus which
attacks and may ultimately destroy the body’s natural immune system.
• Infected employee: an employee who has tested positive for HIV or who has
been diagnosed as having HIV/AIDS.
advantages and disadvantages the test holds for the person and the influence
the result, positive or negative, will have on them.
• STDs: acronym for "sexually transmitted diseases". These are infections passed
from one person to another during sexual intercourse, including syphilis,
gonorrhoea and HIV.
Nel et al. (2012) point out that the HIV/Aids pandemic is acknowledged as being the
single most important strategic issue facing South African business and is the greatest
challenge of the new millennium so far. All levels of management of organisations
have to be fully aware of the situation, because it has become a national crisis. South
Africa has one of the highest per capita HIV/AIDS prevalence and infection rates in
the world. According to Statistics SA, 12.6% of South Africa’s total is living with HIV,
thus an estimated 7,06 million people (Statistics South Africa, 2017).
The good news is that the rate at which the population in South Africa is being infected
is estimated to be declining from 1,9% in 2002 to 0,9% in 2017 (Statistics South Africa,
2017).
AIDS leads to lost opportunities for business, lower productivity and lower
competitiveness. It is very important to start HIV/AIDS campaigns to avoid loss of
productive staff. Every South African business, no matter what the size, has a
significant role to play in combating HIV/AIDS.
The Code of Good Practice on key aspects of HIV/AIDS and employment was
published on 1 December 2000. It contains useful guidelines and legal requirements
for employers, trade unions and employees who needs to deal with the HIV/AIDS
pandemic.
WHO. Facts about health in the African Region of WHO. Available at:
http://www.who.int/hiv/en/
UNAIDS. Global facts and figures: The global AIDS epidemic. Available at:
http://www.unaids.org/en
http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022017.pdf
The HIV/AIDS pandemic demands that every employer should get involved in the
efforts to contain it. Because HIV/AIDS has a "bottom-line" influence on business,
workplace programmes geared towards countering its strategic and operational
effects are no longer a luxury. In the same way that bad debt, workplace accidents,
theft, robbery, lack of quality and poor cash management may threaten the existence
of companies; HIV could be a similar forerunner of disaster.
To manage HIV/AIDS in the workplace, companies will need to realise that the
pandemic will affect every workplace, manager and employee in some way.
• Absenteeism and attrition are likely to increase as employees become ill and
need to take long-term sick leave.
• Employees need to take time off work to take care of their sick family members.
• Employees may need to take time off work to attend funerals of family members
and colleagues.
• Medical health clams will increase and this will affect medical contributions.
One of the most effective ways of reducing and managing the impact of HIV/AIDS in
the workplace is through the implementation of an HIV/AIDS policy and programme.
Addressing aspects of HIV/AIDS in the workplace will enable employers, trade unions
and government to actively contribute towards local, national and international efforts
to prevent and control HIV/AIDS.
• This release uses the cohort-component methodology to estimate the 2017 mid-
year population of South Africa.
• The estimates cover all the residents of South Africa at the 2017 mid-year, and
are based on the latest available information. Estimates may change as new data
become available. With the new estimate comes an entire series of revised
estimates for the period 2002–2017.
• For 2017, Statistics South Africa (Stats SA) estimates the mid-year population at
56,52 million.
• About 29,6% of the population is aged younger than 15 years and approximately
8,1% (4,60 million) is 60 years or older. Similar proportions of those younger than
15 years live in Gauteng (21,1%) and KwaZulu-Natal (21,1%). Of the elderly
aged 60 years and older, the highest percentage 24,0% (1,10 million) reside in
Gauteng. The proportion of elderly persons aged 60 and older is increasing over
time.
• Life expectancy at birth for 2017 is estimated at 61,2 years for males and 66,7
years for females.
• The infant mortality rate for 2017 is estimated at 32,8 per 1 000 live births.
The estimated overall HIV prevalence rate is approximately 12,6% among the South
African population. The total number of people living with HIV is estimated at
approximately 7,06 million in 2017. For adults aged 15–49 years, an estimated 18,0%
of the population is HIV positive.
Those who become infected with HIV do not need treatment with antiretroviral drugs
immediately. There is an asymptomatic period during which the body‘s immune
system controls the HIV infection. After some time the rapid replication of the virus
overwhelms the immune system and the patient is in need of antiretroviral treatment
(The United States Agency for International Development, 2013).
The WHO recommends that cotrimoxazole is provided to all children born to HIV+
mothers until their status can be determined. With normal antibody tests a child‘s HIV
status cannot be determined until 18 months of age because the mother‘s antibodies
are present in the child‘s blood. Thus all children born to HIV-positive mothers should
receive cotrimoxazole until aged 18 months. For children aged between 18 months
and 5 years the WHO recommends cotrimoxazole should be provided to all children
who are HIV positive. After the age of 5 years children should be on cotrimoxazole if
they have progressed to Stage III or IV. If early diagnosis is available then only HIV-
positive children are considered in need of cotrimoxazole (The United States Agency
for International Development, 2013)
Table 2.1 shows the number of adults receiving ART, number of children receiving
ART and percentage of children receiving cotrimoxazole, 2005–2010
Table 2.2 shows the prevalence and the total number of people living with HIV from
2002 to 2017. The total number of persons living with HIV in South Africa increased
from an estimated 4,94 million in 2002 to 7,06 million in 2017. For 2017 an estimated
12,57% of the total population is HIV positive.
Prevalence %
HIV
Women Adult Youth Total Incidence
Year population
15-49 15-49 15-24 population rate % 15-49
(millions)
2002 20,23 17,65 7,31 10,91 1,90 4,94
2003 20,42 17,77 7,02 11,15 1,87 5,09
2004 20,56 17,85 6,68 11,33 1,88 5,23
2005 2065 17,89 6,78 11,48 1,86 5,35
2006 20,70 17,90 6,71 11,58 1,83 5,47
2007 20,79 17,95 6,60 11,70 1,74 5,60
2008 20,00 18,11 6,56 11,88 1,74 5,77
2009 21,16 18,22 6,48 12,01 1,62 5,92
2010 21,31 18,31 6,32 12,14 1,46 6,08
2011 21,45 18,39 6,09 12,28 1,33 6,25
2012 21.53 18,43 5,82 12,39 1,21 6,41
2013 21,48 18,35 5,45 12,43 1,02 6,54
2014 21,40 18,25 5,12 12,46 0,97 6,67
2015 21,34 18,17 4,92 12,50 1,01 6,80
2016 21,29 18,10 4,79 12,55 1,00 6,93
2017 21,17 17,98 4,64 12,57 0,91 7,06
You may view the rest of the report on the internet, it includes very interesting statistics
regarding HIV and AIDS in South Africa (Statistics South Africa, 2017).
Given the stigma as well as the myths and misconceptions surrounding HIV and AIDS
in many communities, there is a tendency for people, particularly those with high-risk
profiles, to be hesitant or even fearful of being tested for HIV.
The potential for stigmatization, discrimination and even victimization is real - Hence
the need for testing and counselling to be voluntary. Despite the continued AIDS
epidemic affecting our country, the majority of South African companies have not
begun to fully assess the impact of the disease on their workplaces.
There are a variety of criteria that companies should look at when assessing the risk
to their workplaces:
• The first is labour intensity. The more labour-intensive a company the greater the
impact of Aids will be.
• The demographics of employees are also important criteria. Women are more
affected by the disease than men and unskilled workers are disproportionately
affected compared to skilled workers.
• Skilled workers who become infected, however, will cost the company
considerably more money as they command more comprehensive benefit
packages. Depending on the company's benefits structure, the infection of one
skilled employee can cost the company six times that employee's salary every
year in medical bills, absenteeism and lost productivity.
• Where skilled employees are highly specialised in their field of expertise, the loss
of such an employee can cost the company millions of rand - and such skills are
often irreplaceable
• Certain industries are at greater risk than others: the transport industry, for
example, is considered high risk as it employs workers who spend time away
from home. So too are companies that employ migrant labour such as in mining
and construction.
• The company's customer-base will also be affected by HIV/Aids and will not only
show declining growth in absolute numbers as breadwinners become sick with
Aids, but also purchasing patterns may change as consumers spend more
money on healthcare.
This enables the company to compile accurate HIV statistics. AIDS training by firms
should be consistent and on-going and should follow a multifaceted approach to stand
any chance of getting employees to change their ways.
Companies which believe that simply handing out condoms and putting up posters will
lead to any positive lifestyle changes by their employees are sadly mistaken. A
successful training intervention will ensure that both employees and management are
taught the basics of HIV/Aids.
Firstly, they should not assume that management is knowledgeable about the disease,
because in many instances they are not. Secondly, lower-level employees may not
understand concepts such as immune system, viruses and Aids-related syndromes.
These should be explained using pictures and analogies that people can relate to
easily. Life skills training, human anatomy and a healthy lifestyle may also have to be
covered.
Companies should not think that only their lower-level workers are at risk of HIV
infection, and offer training to these employees. Not only does this send out the
message that Aids is their problem, and not ours, but it is also completely wrong when
one considers that soon 15% of South Africa's skilled workforce is expected to be HIV-
positive.
Central to Aids education is the need to tackle head-on the negative attitudes,
discrimination and the overwhelming stigma surrounding the disease. This should be
done in a straightforward, open and honest manner and should take into account the
real fears of employees. Negative attitudes tend to be prevalent in some cultures and
therefore cultural sensitivity is required.
The good news is that both attitudes and cultures are learned and can therefore be
challenged and changed over time. Aids trainers should not shy away from dealing
with difficult questions surrounding sex, culture, religion and politics, as only by
beginning a dialogue involving these issues will we ever begin to value our differences
and create a no-blame culture.
HIV/Aids disproportionately affects women in our society. When one considers that in
Africa six times more females are infected than males and that, according to the
Department of Health, the highest rates of infection in South Africa are now in girls
aged between 13 and 19, the urgent need to address gender issues becomes glaringly
apparent (Department of Health, 2014). Gender-equality awareness should therefore
be incorporated into Aids training, or run parallel to it.
Some of the problems directly facing women in the fight against Aids are the
extraordinarily high rape statistics in South Africa and the continued disempowerment
of women, especially relating to sexual issues and condom usage in male-dominated
cultures. The solution is to persuade people to value basic human dignity and respect
between individuals irrespective of gender, culture and race, she says.
Health and safety representatives should have their skills updated so they are
competent in reducing the risk of HIV transmission in the event of workplace accidents.
They should especially be trained in universal safety precautions, the use of
mouthpieces, the administering of post-exposure prophylactics, post-accident HIV
testing and compensation claims.
All employees should be taught their legal rights in the workplace concerning Aids, but
managers, in particular, should have a sound understanding of the legal implications
to avoid unnecessary litigation. Managers should be aware they may not ask any
employee if they have HIV. And should an employee disclose his or her status to a
manager, that manager may not tell anyone else without the employee's written
consent. To do so could lead to the manager's dismissal. Aids training should also be
included in the company's induction programme for new workers.
Finally, it is important that the Aids message is not lost in translation and, preferably,
should be conveyed in the worker's mother tongue. Holistic educational interventions
do work but a sustained effort is required as well as a dedicated leadership team, she
says.
There are many myths about contracting HIV/Aids in the workplace, and often very
little preparation to prevent it from being contracted. There is no known risk of getting
HIV from working in a normal group setting.
The virus dies within three seconds of being exposed to air. Although occupational
transmission of the disease is unlikely, it is possible for employees to get cuts from
sharp utensils or equipment. The best policy is to treat all workers and colleagues as
if they were HIV positive in cases of workplace accidents. This does not discriminate
against anyone.
For example, company’s drivers should have protective gloves in their vehicles in case
of motor accidents. Keep Jik or bleach in your first-aid kit for cleaning up after
accidents. If it is proved that an employee has contracted HIV from a workplace
accident, the onus is on the employer to assist that employee in applying for
workman’s compensation.
The company should send any employee who fears the risk of HIV infection due to a
workplace accident for a test to determine their status - if the employee wishes.
HIV/Aids is already beginning to impact directly and indirectly on company profits.
No company is immune to the effects and costs will grow exponentially without
interventions. Aids have major cost implications for group life and medical aid claims,
lower productivity and rising replacement and training costs.
28 © Business Management Training College (Pty) Ltd
MANAGING HIV/AIDS IN THE WORKPLACE
For treatment programmes to succeed, the company's support, both financial and
through staff and management counselling is needed. There is still a misguided
tendency in many boardrooms to view HIV and AIDS as a social welfare issue and not
a corporate responsibility, beyond paying lip service to ineffective awareness
programmes and making provisions in company medical aid and group life schemes.
Aids sufferers are seen as being replaceable and there is a belief that the problem is
self-managing and that there will always be work-seekers. "The statistics are
staggering. The epidemic is rapidly spreading through the economically active
population, 13% of the national population is currently infected and with the total
number of infections expected to reach nine million in 2015, the prognosis for future
costs is bleak without risk-management interventions.
The first step in managing the situation is to determine a company's HIV prevalence
level by undertaking a confidential benchmark survey of HIV infections, which would
provide data for forwarding projections of Aids-related liabilities. The company should
then develop strategies for risk-management interventions using a battery of tools
including medical interventions, management training and insurance.
Each company is unique in its Aids risk profile. The extent of those risks varies even
within a larger group and from province to province. KwaZulu-Natal has the highest
incidence, followed by Mpumalanga and Gauteng. The Aids problem will not go away,
the "ostrich manoeuvre" is not an appropriate response, and HIV has to be recognised
as a treatable chronic disease for which affordable medication and other interventions
are available.
"When the costs of leaving the situation unchecked are balanced against effective
interventions, it becomes apparent that this is both the financial and morally correct
route to take. HIV/Aids is a reality and it will hit at least 20-30% of the economically
active and productive members of our population over the next 20 years. Economic
productivity and consumption will fall dramatically as those who produce and consume
the economic wealth die. No business will be unaffected.
The way in which employers choose to handle HIV-Aids in their workplaces has legal
implications for businesses. Legislation will both directly and indirectly affect the rights
of employers and employees.
Section 7 of the EEA makes it illegal for any employer to request that an employee
take an HIV test. In order to test employees for HIV, employers need to apply to the
Labour Court which will determine whether the employer's particular circumstances
make testing justifiable. The Labour courts have so far denied all applications.
The Labour Relations Act deals with good practice on dismissing employees for
incapacity due to ill health. This is what employers will have to draw from once
employees who develop full-blown Aids are no longer fit for work.
The transmission of HIV-Aids in the workplace is dealt with under the Occupational
Health and Safety Act. An employer is obliged to provide, as far as is reasonably
practicable, a safe workplace. This may include ensuring that the risk of occupational
exposure to HIV is minimised. Workplaces should have available protective gloves
and mouthpieces for mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.
Finally, the Medical Schemes Act provides that employees with HIV or Aids may not
be unfairly discriminated against in the allocation of employee benefits. Employees
who become ill with Aids should be treated like any other employee with a comparable
life-threatening illness with regard to access to employee benefits.
The above legislation, in conjunction with the code of good practice, should guide
companies in the development of an effective Aids policy and the implementation of
an intervention strategy. There is evidence of panic and despair in the way
corporations are dealing with the HIV/Aids pandemic, which costs them money and
affects their production capacity.
Over the next five years the number of Aids sufferers employed in South Africa is
expected to grow to well over one million and notwithstanding the relatively small
number of Aids sufferers in the workplace at present, it is evident that corporate South
Africa is already feeling the harsh impact of HIV/Aids. Once the extent of the problem
has been determined, the company can embark on a strategy to manage it.
Absenteeism and low productivity are the obvious problems facing an organisation
and it is these issues that need to be addressed. Productivity will drop off in a sick
labour force and extra workers will have to be hired to cover for those who are absent.
Provided there is early detection, the application of primary health care principles and,
at the right time, the introduction of anti-retroviral drugs, we can prolong the pre-Aids
period of the disease and make for more productive HIV-positive workers.
A Code of Good Practice has been developed for application within employer
Employment Equity Act (EEA) obligations. More precisely, the code's primary
objective is "to set out guidelines for employers and trade unions to implement so as
to ensure individuals with HIV infection are not unfairly discriminated against in the
workplace.
In this regard, provisions in relation to the following are contained in the code:
A secondary objective of the code is "to provide guidelines for employers, employees
and trade unions on how to manage HIV/Aids within the workplace".
Pursuant to this objective, guidelines are provided for in the code of good practice
which include:
• strategy development to assess and reduce the impact of the epidemic upon the
workplace; and
• support for individuals infected with and/or affected by HIV/Aids so that they may
continue to work productively for as long as possible.
The code has been specifically issued in accordance with section 54(1) of the EEA,
although it has relevance to a broad range of legislation including but not limited to
Labour Relations Act, the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, the Occupational
Health and Safety Act and the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair
Discrimination Act.
The timing of the issuing of the code is significant as it coincides with the formative
stages of employer Employment Equity Plan implementation.
The HIV/Aids code should be incorporated into the Employment Equity Plans and be
monitored. While section 187(1)(f) of the Labour Relations Act prohibits an employer
from dismissing an employee purely on the grounds of their HIV positive status, such
an employee's employment termination may be permissible in accordance with section
188(1)(a)(i) of the Labour Relations Act (i.e.: for a valid reason related to the
employee's capacity).
This accords with section 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act which
stipulates that an employer must, as far as is reasonably practicable, provide a safe
workplace which (according to section 5.3.6 of the HIV/Aids code) "may include
ensuring that the risk of occupational exposure to HIV is minimised.
Nel et al. (2012) provide the following guidelines in terms of dealing with HIV/AIDS
in the workplace:
• Employees with HIV/AIDS should be managed so that they are able to work
productively for as long as possible.
• Strategies should be formulated to deal with the direct and indirect costs of
HIV/AIDS in the workplace.
• Employers are required, in terms of both the Occupational Health and Safety Act
and Mine Health and Safety Act, to provide, as far as reasonably practicable, a
safe workplace. This may include ensuring that the risk of occupational exposure
to HIV/AIDS is minimised.
The Code of Good Practice on key aspects of HIV/AIDS and employment is issued by
the Minister of Labour Commission, on the advice of the Commission for Employment
Equity in terms of section 54 (1) (a) of the Employment Equity Act, 1998 (Act No. 55
of 1998).
The Code's primary objective is to set out guidelines for employers and trade unions
to implement so as to ensure individuals with HIV infection are not unfairly
discriminated against in the workplace.
• Developing strategies to assess and reduce the impact of the epidemic upon the
workplace.
• between the workplace and other stakeholders at a sectoral, local, provincial and
national level.
TABLE 2.3: EXTRACT EEA (1998) CODE OF GOOD PRACTICE ON HIV AND
AIDS AND THE WORLD OF WORK
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 HIV and AIDS are a serious public health challenge which has socioeconomic,
employment and human rights implications.
2.2 HIV poses a significant obstacle to the attainment of decent work and
sustainable development. It has led to the loss of the livelihoods of millions of
persons living with or affected by HIV and AIDS. Its effects are concentrated among
the most productive age groups and it imposes huge costs on enterprises through
falling productivity, increased labour costs and the loss of skills and experience.
2.3 HIV and AIDS affect every workplace, with prolonged staff illness, absenteeism,
and death, which impacts on productivity, employee benefits, occupational health
and safety, production costs, workplace morale and escalating HIV associated with
TB and STis.
2.5 Through this Code, the country commits to mitigate the impact of the epidemic
in the world of work taking into account all relevant Conventions of the International
Labour Organization, including Recommendation No. 200.
2.6 One of the most effective ways of reducing and managing the impact of HIV and
AIDS in the workplace is through the implementation of workplace HIV and AIDS
policies and programmes. Addressing aspects of HIV and AIDS in the workplace will
enable employers, workers and their organisations and government to actively
contribute towards local, national and international efforts to prevent and control HIV
and AIDS.
2.7 Every person should take personal responsibility in relation to HIV and AIDS to
educate themselves, prevent transmission, seek available treatment and treat
others with dignity and respect. All persons have the responsibility to support the
achievement of the objectives of this Code.
e) promote appropriate and effective ways of managing HIV and AIDS and TB in the
workplace; and
f) give effect to the international and regional obligations of the Republic of South
Africa on HIV and AIDS and TB in the world of work.
4.1 All workers working under all forms or arrangements, and at all workplaces,
including:
c) volunteers;
4.2 All sectors of economic activity, including the private and public sectors and the
formal and informal economies.
5. KEY PRINCIPLES
The guiding principles in this Code are based on International Conventions and
Recommendations, The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa and· national
laws, which include:
The response to HIV and AIDS must be recognised as a contributing factor to the
realization of human rights, dignity, fundamental freedoms, responsibility and
equality for all, including workers and their dependants.
5.2 HIV and AIDS is a workplace issue HIV and AIDS is a workplace issue and must
be treated like any other serious illness or condition in the workplace. HIV and AIDS
must be included among the essential elements of the national, provincial, local and
sectoral response to the pandemic with full participation of all stakeholders.
5.3 Reduce HIV-related stigma and unfair discrimination and promote equality of
Women and girls are at greater risk and more vulnerable to HIV infection and are
Real or perceived HIV status is not a valid cause for termination of employment.
Workers with HIVrelated illness must not be denied the possibility of continuing to
carry out their work unless proven medically unfit to do so. As with many other
conditions, workers with HIV and AIDS must be reasonably accommodated and be
able to work for as long as medically fit. Medical examination should be limited to
the capacity of a worker to perform the task(s) of a particular job.
5.6 Prevention
Prevention of all modes of HIV transmission and TB is a fundamental priority for the
country. In keeping with this principle the workplace must facilitate access to
comprehensive information and education to reduce the risk of HIV transmission
and HIV-TB co-infection and STI's.
5.7 Treatment, Care and Support Treatment, care and support services on HIV and
AIDS must be accessible to all workers and their dependants. All workers must have
access to affordable health services, social security, insurance schemes or other
employment-related benefits either through the employer, the State or
nongovernmental organisations. Programmes of care and support must include
measures of reasonable accommodation in the workplace for persons living with
HIV or HIV-related illnesses.
5.9 Occupational Health and Safety The workplace must be safe and healthy for all
workers, and they must benefit from programmes to prevent specific risks of
occupational transmission of HIV and related transmissible diseases, such as TB,
especially in jobs most at risk, including the health care sector.
5.10 Testing, Confidentiality and Disclosure Workers and their dependants must
enjoy protection of their privacy, including confidentiality relating to their own HIV
status or that of their co-workers. Workers must not be required to undergo HIV
testing or other forms of screening for HIV unless found to be justified by the Labour
Court. The results of HIV testing must be confidential and not endanger access to
jobs, tenure, job security or opportunities for advancement.
…. You may wish read the rest of the code from the government’s website (link at
the end)
7.2 HIVTesting
7.2.1 Authorisation for mandatory HIV testing of workers may only be obtained from
the Labour Court in terms of Section 7{2) of the Employment Equity Act.
7.2.2 Mandatory Testing for HIV is not a requirement in the world of work, including
the following circumstances: a) during an application for employment; b) as a
condition of employment; c) during procedures related to termination of employment;
and d) as an eligibility requirement for training or staff development programmes.
7.2.3 Anonymous, unlinked surveillance or epidemiological HIV testing in the
workplace may occur provided it is undertaken in accordance with ethical and legal
principles. The information obtained must not be used to unfairly discriminate
against workers. Testing will not be considered anonymous if there is a reasonable
possibility that a worker's HIV status can be deduced from the results.
7.3.1 All persons, including those with HIV and AIDS have the legal right to privacy.
A worker is therefore not legally required to disclose his or her HIV status or related
medical information to his or her employer or to other workers.
7.3.2 The results of HIV testing must be confidential and not endanger access to
jobs, tenure, job security or opportunities for advancement.
7.3.3 Where a worker chooses to voluntarily disclose his or her HIV status to the
employer or to other workers, this information must not be disclosed to others
without the worker's express written consent. Where written consent Is not possible,
steps must be taken to confirm that the worker wishes to disclose his or her HIV
status.
7.3.5 Access to personal data relating to a worker's HIV status and related medical
data must be bound by the rules of confidentiality consistent with the relevant
national laws.
… You may wish read the rest of the code from the government’s website (link at
the end)
7.5.1 Workers with HIV and AIDS must not be unfairly discriminated against in the
allocation of employee benefits.
7.5.2 Where an employer offers a medical benefit, that employer must ensure that
this benefit does not unfairly discriminate, directly or indirectly, against any worker
on the basis of his or her real or perceived HIV status.
… You may wish read the rest of the code from the government’s website (link at
the end)
Employers, trade unions and employees must develop and effectively implement
integrated gender sensitive strategies to respond to the impact of HIV and AIDS,
including TB and STis, in the workplace. This must be done as far as possible in
cooperation with national, provincial, local and sectoral initiatives, including:
b) The development and implementation of HIV and AIDS workplace policies and
programmes that are free from unfair discrimination and promote human rights.
In developing and implementing long and short term measures to deal with and
reduce this impact, the following must be taken into account:
b) Management commitment;
and
g) Monitoring and Evaluation of HIV and AIDS policies and programmes must be
put in place.
All social partners have the responsibility to promote education, training and
information about HIV and AIDS in the world of work.
9.3.1 Training, safety instructions and any necessary guidance in the workplace
related to HIV and AIDS must be provided in a clear and accessible form for all
workers.
The complete Code of Good practice can be accessed from the following website:
https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/35435gon451.pdf
South Africa's Code of Good Practice on HIV-Aids has been adopted internationally
by the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and is a comprehensive document and
good start for employers who would like to know more about the do's and don’ts of the
disease.
It draws largely from the provisions of the Employment Equity Act (EEA) which
prohibits discrimination against any employee, or applicant for employment, on the
basis of HIV status.
Confidentiality
An employee who is, or becomes, HIV infected has the right to confidentiality and
privacy, as is the case with an employee who has experienced or is experiencing
any other medical or psychosocial related incident. HIV infected employees are not
obliged to inform management, or any other person in their organisation, of their HIV
status. There is no justification for asking job applicants to disclose HIV related
personal information. Nor are employees obliged to reveal such personal
information to fellow employees. All reasonable precautions are taken to ensure that
information regarding individual HIV status, voluntarily provided to anyone in the
organisation, or ascertained through a medical consultation, via an HIV test or
disclosure of known HIV positive status, is maintained in strict confidence. Such
information is not disclosed to any other person in, or outside, the organisation
without the individual’s express written consent. Organisation summary statistics,
concerning group HIV infection rates and/or other HIV/ AIDS outcomes and
HIV/AIDS-related risk behaviours, compiled from individual HIV testing, and/or
knowledge, attitude and practice surveys, may be shared with employees while
respecting and maintaining the confidentiality of individual responses and results.
These statistics are scientifically and ethically derived and only provided to external
stakeholders once appropriate attempts have been made to share these with
employees and their representatives.
Non-discrimination
ABC Company does not tolerate any form of unfair discrimination against those
infected with HIV and takes all reasonable steps to respect their dignity and their
individual human rights. All employees, supervisors, managers, and medical staff
who know (or think they know) an individual’s HIV status are made aware of the
requirements and responsibilities of disclosing this information to a third party, and
the consequences that could arise if this responsibility is disregarded.
Gender Equality
ABC Company recognises that women are more likely to become infected and are
more often adversely affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic than men due to biological,
socio-cultural and economic reasons. ABC Company strives to equalise gender
relations, recognising that the empowerment of women is vital to successfully
prevent the spread of HIV infection and enable women to cope with HIV/AIDS.
Social dialogue
ABC Company recognises that it takes courage for individuals to disclose their HIV
positive status, and that such disclosure challenges the stigma associated with the
epidemic. The company encourages employees to be open about their HIV or AIDS
status if they so wish and takes all reasonable steps to ensure that such employees
are not unfairly discriminated against or stigmatised and that they have access to
appropriate counselling and support.
Employment
Applicants for employment, for any occupation or position, are required to pass a
standard pre-placement medical examination. This does not include an HIV test, nor
indirect screening methods, such as questions in verbal or written form about
previous HIV tests and/or questions related to the assessment of HIV risk behaviour.
The only health-related criterion for employing an individual is the person’s fitness
to perform the work offered. If a person makes his/her HIV/AIDS status known
voluntarily, it shall not be a basis for refusing to conclude, continue or renew an
employment contract. Employees with HIV/ AIDS are governed by the same
contractual obligations as all other employees.
Employees who become HIV positive will continue to be employed until they become
medically unfit to work. Medical incapacitation is handled in the same way as all
other ill-health conditions in terms of ABC Company’s incapacitation policy and
procedure. An employee’s HIV status is not considered grounds for any other
employee refusing to work with him/her. Working with an HIV positive person does
not put an employee at risk of becoming infected in the course of normal working
contact. ABC Company’s policy includes all ill-health retirements irrespective of the
cause, and no special conditions exist for persons with HIV/ AIDS which might place
them at a disadvantage relative to others. HIV infected employees and those
suffering from AIDS are entitled to the same sick leave, disability, pension and
medical benefits as all other employees.
ABC Company encourages all employees who are at risk of HIV infection to undergo
voluntary counselling and testing. We believe that voluntary counselling and testing
for HIV is a critical intervention that helps to link care and support for those with HIV
infection to our broader prevention programmes aimed at turning the tide of the
HIV/AIDS epidemic. No employee is forced or coerced to undergo such testing.
HIV testing requires informed consent. This implies that the individual knows and
understands that the test is, why it is necessary, the benefits, risks, alternatives and
any possible social or economic implications of the outcome. Counselling provides
information, education, and psychological and emotional support in order to maintain
optimal health and well-being and the capacity to be effective employees for as long
as possible. Counselling services inform employees of their rights and benefits in
relation to statutory social security programmes and medical and other employee
benefits as well as any life skills programmes, which may help employees cope with
HIV/AIDS. Counselling services are also linked to programmes of direct care and
support for employees with HIV/AIDS.
manner that takes into account levels of education and literacy and the need to be
situated in an appropriate cultural context. Educational strategies are based on
consultation between employers and employees and their representatives and the
methods used are as interactive and participatory as possible.
We strive to ensure that our information and education programmes are sensitive,
accurate and current.
Prevention
There is increasing evidence that early care and support improves the quality and
length of life of people living with HIV/AIDS. Medical assistance is provided for HIV
ABC Company must ensure that employees are aware of any limitation of benefits
imposed in terms of these arrangements. Notwithstanding these limitations, ABC
Company are encouraged to:
• keep HIV positive employees healthy and productive for as long as possible,
through early participation in wellness programmes;
• prevent opportunistic infections that account for most of the morbidity and
mortality associated with AIDS, particularly TB • reduce mother to child
transmission of HIV by facilitating access to appropriate antiretroviral therapy
(ART);
• offer appropriate and effective ART on an affordable and sustainable basis for
all employees who develop AIDS • ensure that HIV care and support
programmes are extended into the community through existing public and
private health service providers and through NGOs;
Policy Review
This policy will be reviewed on a regular basis to take account of the progression of
the epidemic; developments in medical care; experience in preventing new
infections and managing HIV/AIDS in the workplace; its impact on employee benefit
schemes; and changes to relevant legislation.
The Nature of
Organisational
Change
IN THIS CHAPTER
• Analyse the internal and external forces that may be driving change;
• Explain the nature and importance of change and transformation in South African
organisations;
and not a negative process, businesses must have a vision, a strategy and a proven
and adaptable process for managing change.
In this chapter we discuss how organisations can manage and control strategic change
and the importance of promoting change.
Stone (2008) is of the opinion that the need for change becomes evident when there
is a gap between organisations, division, function or individual performance objectives,
and actual performance of the organisation.
According to Nel et al. (2012) change drastically shortens the lifespan of organisations.
This in turn reflects the organisation’s ability to phase out strategies, policies, and
businesses that are no longer relevant, whilst creating new activities, product,
services, and strategies to sustain performance, relevance, and success.
Nel et al. (2012) point out that the Human Resource Manager will have to improve the
balance between the competing demands of managing current performance, and let
go of some other activities, attitudes, and patterns of thinking.
The following are examples of external triggers for change (Jones, 2010; Wadell,
Cummings, & Worley, 2007):
• Changes in the broader environment such as political shifts and social events,
(for example, September 11 in the US in 2001, and the catastrophic tsunamis,
Bali bombings, the Iraqi and Afghanistan wars, Haiti earthquake, etc.)
The following are examples of internal triggers for change (Jones, 2010; Wadell,
Cummings, & Worley, 2007):
• restructuring.
• Job descriptions;
• Decision-making processes;
• Managerial style;
• Quality of programmes;
When examining the internal and external driving forces of change, we need to look
at the variables in the macro– and market environment.
For this balance to be altered, in other words for change to take place, there must be
either a strengthening of the driving forces for example:
• legislation;
• globalisation has the effect of world-class competitors entering the South African
market;
• economic imperatives;
• competitive pressure;
• traditional practices;
• organisational culture;
• job security;
• lack of resources;
Stone (2008) identifies two basic forms of change in organisations namely planned
and unplanned change.
According to Net et al. (2012) planned change occurs when change results form a
deliberate decision to alter the organisation. A company moves from one structure to
another to alter the structure of functions in the organisation.
According to Nel et al. (2012) whether forced or planned, change must be managed,
because it can be either disruptive or constructive, depending on how effectively the
process is executed. Net et al. identifies three scopes for planned change:
• Incremental change: Making change to a small work procedure will fall into this
category; it is usually a change involving minor improvement or adjustments.
Kurt Lewin is responsible for introducing the force field analysis approach to manage
planned business change. This model recognises that change is the consequence of
a disturbance in the force field surrounding an entity or business, and that the objective
should be to re-establish a situation of equilibrium (balance). The underlying principle
is that the driving forces must outweigh straining or resisting forces in any situation if
change is to happen (Cameron & Green, 2012)
3.2.1.1 Stage 1:
Unfreezing the current organisational balance. This involves the process of making
people aware of their habitual modes of thinking and behaviour and making them
aware of the need to change (Senior, 2002)
Main tasks of the change agent during this stage are to: (Kroon, 1995)
3.2.1.2 Stage 2:
Moving / changing to a new position. This process involves making the actual changes
that will take the business to a new level.
3.2.1.3 Stage 3:
Refreezing in the new position. This process involves making the changes permanent
and rewarding desired outcomes by offering rewards for performance.
Therefore the best strategy for change is to reduce the restraining forces and thereby
increasing the driving forces. The organisation must be awakened by a new reality
and must disengage from the past, recognising that the old ways of doing things is no
longer acceptable.
The organisation needs to embrace a new vision of the future, uniting behind the steps
necessary to achieve that vision. Finally as new attitudes, practises, processes and
policies are put in place to change the company, these must be “refrozen” or solidified.
This effort can only be successful if the whole company participates in the change
effort.
A change agent is mostly used to manage the planned change process as he/she is
an independent external management consultant or facilitator.
Jones (2010) and Stone (2008) describe how employees often resist change when
they do not understand its implications, and perceive that it might cost them much
more than the amount they will gain.
Questions such as: “what about me?” often arise. People fear that they might lose
something valuable through the change process, such as their job, status in the
business or fear of their future role in the business. Often, people don’t understand the
reasons for the change or don’t agree with the changes.
Stakeholders resist change not purely on emotional grounds, but for reasonable and
predictable reasons:
1. Narrow-minded self-interest.
Nel et al (2012) point out that people perceive change as a threat to their self-interest.
Reactance is a negative reaction that occurs when people feel that their personal
freedom is threatened. This may also occur when stakeholders expects to lose
something as a result of change being implemented.
• loss of power or control (feeling that things are being done ‘to’ them rather than
’by’ them or ’with’ them to improve a situation);
• loss of confidence (feeling incapable of performing well under the new way of
doing things);
• additional workload;
• loss of income (feeling that their pay and benefits may be reduced or that they
may lose their jobs);
• job insecurity .
2. Resentment.
Resentment develops either within particular people because of change, often called
change fatigue or due to the increased presence of power and authority. This accurse
as a result of the number and range of instructions that almost inevitably flow from
management in implementing change.
Not trusting those who proposing change, this is normally a symptom of poor
communication.
7. Disrupted habits.
Feeling upset when old ways of doing things will no longer be accepted
8. Poor timing.
Feeling inadequate or humiliated because the ‘old’ ways are no longer perceived as
good ways.
9. Lack of purpose.
Team norms may be altered if they conflict with the desired changes.
These people may resist change if they feel that their group structure, social norms or
power base is being affected. At organisational level it has been suggested that a
series of interrelated factors may contribute to resistance, including organisational
structures, culture and strategy.
• “Can’t change” blockage: This blockage centres around the lack of resources or
power
Step 3: Promote consensus for the new vision and the necessary competence to
follow it through. Managers who cannot adapt to change and transformation issues
during this period must be replaced.
Step 4: Spread the message of regeneration and renewal to all departments without
pushing it from the top. Use the team to break down resistance by enlisting their
feedback about how to organise departments and responsibilities.
• Continually align the project with the vision of where the company is going and
with the wider organisations vision.
• Appoint a project team from across different levels in the organisation to advise
on the process.
• Show or demonstrate early and middle term success to all involved in the process
by showing evidence of benefits achieved through the implemented changes.
• Allow time for feedback from all involved. Take time to listen to positive
responses, objections and allow for adjustments.
• Planning for individual futures takes time. Have a source of transitional funding
available to provide incentives for change. From physical restructuring to
redundancy or early retirement payment as well as Training and Development
funds for skills development initiatives. Anticipate the need for such investments
rather than being reactive to events or barriers brought up during the process.
• Memoranda;
• Letters;
• Short reports;
• Formal reports;
• Presentations.
Depending on the situation most progress reports have the following similarities in
content:
According to Stimpson and Farquharson (2012) there are five different types of
corporate culture:
• Role culture: People in an organisation with role culture show little creativity and
operate within rules. The structure of the organisation is well-defined and each
individual has clear delegated authority. Power and influence come from a
person’s position within the organisation. This corporate culture is mostly
associate with bureaucratic organisations.
• Task culture: Groups are formed to solve particular problems and there will be
clear lines of communication similar to a matrix structure. Such teams often
develop a distinctive culture because they have empowered to make decisions.
Team members are encouraged to be creative.
between individuals of the whole organisation, but this is the most creative type
of culture.
Many businesses have turned themselves around converting potential bankruptcy into
commercial success. Very often this transformation has been achieved by changing
the corporate culture of the business.
Let’s discuss some of the possible situations in which changing culture would seem
essential according to Stimpson and Farquharson (2012):
• A merger or takeover may result in one of the businesses having to adapt its
culture to ensure consistency within the newly created larger business unit.
Changing the culture means changing the way people think and react to problematic
situations. It can also mean changing the way things have been done for years. It may
also involve major changes such as job descriptions, communications methods and
working practices.
“Who moved my cheese?” by Dr Spencer Johnson is a must read for any one going
through change. The importance of understanding different personalities of people
and how they react to change. Written for all ages this story takes less than an hour
to read, but its unique insights can last for a lifetime. “Who moved my cheese? is a
simple parable that reveals profound truths. It is an amusing and enlightening story
of four characters who live in a maze and look for cheese to nourish them and make
them happy. Cheese is a metaphor for what we want to have in life and the maze is
where we look for what we want. This profound book from bestselling author, Dr S
Johnson will show you how to anticipate change, adapt to change quickly, enjoy
change and lastly be ready to change quickly, again and again.”
Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2012). Making sense of change management (3rd ed.).
London: Kogan Page.
Department of Labour. Code of Good Practice on HIV and AIDS and the world of work
(2012). Staatskoerant, 15 June 2012. Retrieved from
https://www.worklaw.co.za/SearchDirectory/Codes_Of_Good_Practice/HIV_and
_AIDS_and_the_World_of_Work.pdf
Jones, G. (2010). Organisational theory, design and change (6th ed.). New Jersey:
Pearson Education.
Nel, P., Werner, A., Du Plessis, A., Ngalo, O., Poisat, P., Sono, T., … Botha, C. (2012).
Human resource management (8th ed.). Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
Statistics South Africa. (2017). Statistical Release P0302. Pretoria. Retrieved from
http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022017.pdf
Stone, R. J. (2008). Human Resource Management (5th Ed.). Milton: John Wiley &
Sons.
The United States Agency for International Development. (2013). Health Policy
initiative in Tanzania report (2009-2013). USA. Retrieved from
http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JFN7.pdf