Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bsoley,+torture+32 1,2 - 2022 pg280 290 1
Bsoley,+torture+32 1,2 - 2022 pg280 290 1
https://doi.org/10.7146/torture.v32i1-2.132846
International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims. All rights reserved.
281
30 ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL ISSUE
S E C T I O N I I I : P R E PA R I N G F O R T H E F U T U R E
ent forms of identity destruction were carried 1981, based on the MS-DOS system. Barely 40
out in Turkey in the Kartal Special Type Prison years later, quantum transmission systems are
(among others), which later gave rise to the becoming available and any desktop computer
well-known F-Type prisons. The Evin prison is capable of handling gigabytes of information
in Tehran has had, for more than 20 years, and in seconds. Advances in the battle for mind
is still in use, a module for experimentation control have followed the same exponential
with different forms of psychological torture, growth. What only ten years ago was part of a
in the past with US and Rusian trainers, now conspiratorial universe, is today a technologi-
on their own. Similar modules have been de- cal reality; sometimes in animal testing models,
scribed in other countries. It seems nobody but very often already in human experimenta-
wants to be left behind in the race to delve tion or applied in small scale environments.
into the limits of the human mind and will. In a very short time, there will be attempts to
scale it up, and a new battle will ensue as civil
Torture methods: changing the outlook society and human rights groups challenge
Psychological torture, in the past, was based the assault on individual liberty. Globally, this
on destruction: the destruction of the body new field, which has undergone extraordinary
through pain, and the destruction of the mind expansion since the 1970s, has been labelled
through psychological methods of attacking neuro-warfare (Krishnan, 2016). Part of it is
self and identity. Internet and Communications Ill-Treatment
Those methods proved to be of little prac- and Torture (ICIT) which looks specifically
tical use, except as punishment, and were not at how communications and social networks
considered cost-effective by the State perpetra- can be used as forms of torture, coercion and
tors. Whatever limited success such methods social control and reviewed elsewhere. (Pérez-
achieved often came at the expense of a neg- Sales & Serra, 2020)
ative social image, international isolation and Torture is understood, in its ultimate
a high political cost for the governments that consequences, as a relationship of domina-
used them. Moreover, such methods cor- tion in which one person breaks the will and
responded poorly with the logic of the free impedes the self-determination of another
market and the monetisation of all aspects of human being, taking control of all aspects of
society in a globalised world in which markets the victims’ life and trying to change the core
supplant States as social regulators. elements of his or her identity to the perpe-
Thus, the torture of the future will be trator’s interests (Pérez-Sales, 2017). This
forms of social control that are also niche purpose will increasingly come to be linked to
TO R T U R E Vo l um e 3 2 , N u mb e r 1 -2 , 2 02 2
markets. The destruction of body and mind the new technologies, artificial intelligence, the
will still be part of contemporary torture; but use of media and internet, and to new forms
the focus of torture methods will increasingly of lethal and non-lethal weapons.
be based on the logic of late capitalist societies.
Controlling the body: of course pain, but
Mind control: more than a myth? not only pain
The technological society is advancing expo- Table 1 collects a brief summary of available
nentially. In 1969, the US military research contemporary non-lethal weapons already
agency ARPA created the first rudimentary in- in use or in experimental stage with poten-
ternet. The first PC came onto the market in tial use as torture devices (National Research
282
30 ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL ISSUE
S E C T I O N I I I : P R E PA R I N G F O R T H E F U T U R E
Acoustic devices • White sound that produces irritability, insomnia and anxiety
• Low-frequency sound that causes headaches, disorientation and
nausea.
• Sound isolation devices – sound deprivation
• Sound saturation devices
Light devices • Strobe lights, dazzling lasers, flash binding lights that cause
disorientation and temporal blindness
Council, 2003; Wright, 2002). Some of them the human body (Davison, 2009b). As an in-
are well-known and debated, like electro-shock strument of coercion and torture, they can
implements (Dermengiu et al., 2008; Institute be used from a certain distance and become
for Security Studies, 2016), sound weapons unaware to the victim. They also allow for con-
(Davison, 2009a; Volcler, 2013) or chemical tinuously targeting a person. In the short term,
riot control agents (Schep et al., 2015). they cause thermal pain that can be unbearable
Others are less well-known, like thermal and in the medium and long-term, they can
lasers, radiofrequency or directed energy potentially cause lesions in the skin or inter-
devices (Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Direc- nal organs. There are also complex behavioural
T O R T U R E Vo l um e 3 2 , N um be r 1 - 2, 20 2 2
torate, 2011; Risling, 2006; United States Air effects, still under study (Davison, 2009b).
Force Research Laboratory, 2002).
Specifically, one of the less known and Nanotechnology and torture
most expanding areas of technological devel- Nanotechnology is the modern and rapidly
opment in recent years is that of so-called Di- expanding field of medicine that applies the
rected EnergyWeapons (DEW). These are based use of nanoparticles (particles with a size of
on the use of different forms of distant energy less than 100 nanometres [nm]) for preven-
emission devices (laser, radiofrequency, mi- tive, therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. It
crowave or other) directed against an individ- is based on the introduction of these particles
ual or focused towards specific areas within into the body through different transporters
283
30 ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL ISSUE
S E C T I O N I I I : P R E PA R I N G F O R T H E F U T U R E
has been reported in episodes of poisoning other harmful effects (J. Illes & Hevia, 2021;
with permanent neurological damage involv- Krishnan, 2016; Leung et al., 2019).
ing Russian dissidents over the last decade.
Also the use of oxytocin and other empathic Unveiling the brain: Accessing thoughts
substances and their potential applications in and feelings
psychiatry and mental health are well known If anything resembles a future in which it
(Lane et al., 2013; Leppanen et al., 2018) and is possible to control the human mind, it is
they have proposed as contemporary forms through the hundreds of civil and military re-
of truth serum (Marks, 2010; Walsh, 2014), search projects on Mind-Brain interfaces and
something that, for now, is far from reality. Remote Neural Monitoring. One step ahead of
284
30 ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL ISSUE
S E C T I O N I I I : P R E PA R I N G F O R T H E F U T U R E
neuroimplants, the aim of mind-brain inter- be marketed. If EEG waves can be amplified
faces is to impant devices that allow for wire- to the point of being detected by an external
less bi-directional communication between device without the need of a headset or exter-
the brain and the external world. Under the nal electrodes -a possibility that will be real in
coverage of medical projects, new generations a short time -, in popular terms, mind-read-
of ever more powerful cortical modems devel- ing and telepathy will be technologically pos-
oped by the military industry1 are marketed sible (Brigham & Kumar, 2010; Vorontsova
and already in use in pilot experimental sub- et al., 2021).
jects. In its present basic form, they allow to
control orthopaedic systems with the mind, Big data, security and surveillance in law
but in their more advanced modalities, corti- enforcement
cal modems allow the user to ‘inject’ images This decade will undoubtedly be remem-
or sounds directly into their visual or auditory bered as the decade of Big Data. The exist-
cortex1,2 allowing blind people to partially ence of super-computers with the capacity to
recover their sight or the brain damaged to process millions of data bytes in milliseconds
restore their ability to recall some memories3, and to integrate and analyse almost instanta-
among other uses. neously databases from very diverse sources
Different labs in Europe, Japan and the US has opened the door not only to an unprec-
have also developed headsets and other extre- edented advertising invasion but also to the
nal devices that act as Brain-Computer Interfaces integration of databases on human beings that
y detecting and amplifying EEG signals, allow- include and combine, for instance, biometric
ing patients to communicate with researchers data, activities, movements, expenditures and
and control external devices simply by imag- opinions, among many other elements. Always
ining the actions of their body parts (Bates, in the name of security and the fight against
2021), a technology that will have many poten- terrorism, and pushed by the new Cold War
tial benefits for patients suffering neurological jargon, governments approve the existence of
disorders. There are now on the market differ- databases with use restricted to military and
ent basic portable devices that monitor electric law-enforcement special units over which
brain activity4,5 and electromyography signals6 there are few to any means of transparency or
for no-touch game interfaces, emotional train- control. Such databases, in the form of anti-
ing and mindfulness practice, among others. terrorist files of persons ‘under special sur-
Different Thought-to-Text devices are already veillance’, have always existed. The difference
available (Willett et al., 2021) and ready to is that the current databases aim to slowly
T O R T U R E Vo l um e 3 2 , N um be r 1 - 2, 20 2 2
that often act with little political oversight. tools and technologies to the mapping and
There are many risks linked to the routine study of neural circuits, and the understand-
use of Big Data by law enforcement agen- ing of the neural and computational basis
cies, especially regarding discrimination and of behaviours, perceptions, thoughts and
abuse (Guthrie, 2017). Policies for full trans- emotion8 (Jorgenson et al., 2015; Koroshetz
parency have been proposed, including, for et al., 2018). New neuro-technologies fuelled
instance, regular meetings between police, by the BRAIN Initiative now allow investiga-
community representatives, elected leaders, tors to map, monitor and modulate complex
technology experts, and civil liberties groups neural circuits, enabling the pursuit of re-
engaged in public and open information ses- search questions previously considered unap-
sions (Guthrie, 2017). proachable (Hsu et al., 2020).
Furthermore, Big Data is used to decide One of the most exciting (and frighten-
political strategies and design communication ing) careers in contemporary science, mostly
campaigns (Stroud & McGregor, 2019) to in- in the private sector is, once deciphered the
crease voting tendencies and get acceptance brain, the pursuit of methods for transfer-
and compliance to unpopular measures. ring the entire information of a human brain
Debates in the field of human rights about into a computer. There are several companies
the limits of the use of Big Data paint a picture working towards being the first to achieve this
of increasingly urgent ethical awareness and goal, with Neurolink, the company owned by
action (Davis & Patterson, 2012). Elon Musk, as the most mentioned in news-
Interception and control of communications papers and the media. According to Ray
is the other side of the coin of social surveil- Kurzweil, director of engineering at Google,
lance. It seemed technologically impossible “we’ll be uploading our entire minds to
to monitor and track millions of telephones computers by 2045 and our bodies will be
and Internet communications around the replaced by machines within 90 years”9. Neu-
world until Edward Snowden and others un- ro-ethicists debate whether, by the time this is
veiled Echelon, the main among other similar achieved, it will transfer more than just a set
global surveillance networks (Cohen, 2014; of neural networks and information, or also
Verri et al., 2014). Echelon, with an estimated transfer that person’s consciousness, which
300,000 employees in 120 stations around the some speculate would amount to, somehow,
world, according to official figures, monitors achieving the immortality of a person in a
more than three billion communications every machine body.
day, 90% of Internet traffic. The information
TO R T U R E Vo l um e 3 2 , N u mb e r 1 -2 , 2 02 2
This possibility has spawned several think- Facing the challenge: Initiatives to defend
tanks of philosophical reflection that try to human rights in the 21st Century.
promote the debate on where contemporary ci-
vilisation and the human species should evolve. Research, documentation and advocacy
An example of this was made in a proposition initiatives
by the Global Future 2045’s 2013 Congress Fortunately, there are some initiatives
which stated the goal “Towards a New Strat- for these new struggles of the human rights
egy for Human Evolution” in an open letter tradition that are central to the fight against
to United Nations General Secretary Ban Ki- torture. Amnesty Tech is a global collective of
Moon, and was debated at Oxford’s Future advocates, hackers, researchers and technolo-
of Humanity Institute and other institutions gists that aims to “bolster social movements
(Benedikter et al., 2016). Furthermore, some in an age of surveillance, challenge the sys-
philosophers are developing models that speak temic threat to our rights posed by the sur-
of a coexistence of a classic labour-based cap- veillance-based business model of the Big Tech
italism with what is called new cognitive cap- companies, ensure accountability in the design
italism, in which persons will have economic and use of new and frontier technologies and
value for their brain and thinking and the eco- encourage innovative uses of technology to
nomical applications of the data it generates help support fundamental rights”11. Besides
(Lushetich, 2021). publishing reports, they undertake strate-
Linked to it is transhumanism, a branch gic litigation cases. Human Rights Watch has
of science devoted to enhancing (or abating) created a specific research line on Technol-
human beings by employing already existing ogy and Rights with a team of full-time re-
and future technologies: artificial intelligence, searchers that has produced both Global and
robotics, cognitive science, information tech- Country-Specific technical reports12,13. There
nology, nanotechnology, biotechnology and are many more14. Just to mention some rele-
others reviewed here (Hofkirchner & Kreowski, vant initiatives, the University of Essex created
2021). While most of the field is futuristic pro- the Human Rights, Big Data and Technology
jections, closer to science-fiction than reality, Research Group15 which has developed good
different projects of the so-called super-soldiers practise guidelines for the digital age. The
are already funded by DARPA military projects Georgetown Law Library created in 2014 a
as publicly announced on their website10. Big special repository on legal initiatives and reg-
Data is also used to create intelligent systems
that can support military decisions in complex
T O R T U R E Vo l um e 3 2 , N um be r 1 - 2, 20 2 2
ulations related to cyberspace and digital the first country to adopt specific national leg-
rights16. The United Nations Educational, Scien- islation on cognitive rights (Zúñiga-Fajuri et
tific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) has al., 2021)
issued a set of Recommendations on the Ethics
of Artificial Intelligence17. In summary
Brain implants and remote Mind-Brain in-
Neuro-ethics and cognitive liberty terfaces; the expansion of nanotechnologies
Most of these initiatives are related to privacy as weapons targeting not only the body but
concerns. Less developed is human rights re- also specific points in the brain; the growing
search and activism related to neuroscience. development of biomarkers and massive sur-
A pioneering movement linked to what veillance methods; the implementation of
was called Cognitive Liberty started more than methods to monitor emotions and thoughts
two decades ago (Boire, 2000) as a reaction to in the interrogation of suspects; the develop-
military research on the use of fMRI and other ment of Internet-based technologies for the
medical devices in lie detection in the inter- manipulation of opinion and social control:
rogation of suspects (Balmer, 2018; Poldrack, these, among many others, are technological
2008). Perhaps the movement was too vision- developments with potential use in manipula-
ary for the time and thus did not achieve the tion of minds, cruel and inhuman treatment
necessary backing from civil society organi- or torture at the individual level, and the ma-
sations. nipulation and social and control of commu-
Different civil society research groups are nities, ethnic groups or societies at a global
working on the ethical challenges and regu- level
lations of new neuro-technologies and neu- The world of civil science and human
ro-warfare (Carle, 2021; Herrera-Ferrá, 2021; rights advocacy has always advanced with a
Judy Illes & Hossain, 2017; Salles, 2021;Yuste minimum of 10 years of delay in regard to the
et al., 2021). There is a pioneering initiative of advances made by military science. Ten years
a group of neuroscientists from different coun- may not have been that long in the past, but it
tries led by the Chilean professor Rafael Yuste, may definitely be too long in the future.
Director of the Neurotechnology Centre at
Columbia University, which has articulated a And, so what?
transdisciplinary platform that lobbies for the Many of these developments in the field of
adoption by the United Nations General As- the interaction between technology, medicine,
sembly of a new charter of cognitive rights and sociology and other branches of sciences have
TO R T U R E Vo l um e 3 2 , N u mb e r 1 -2 , 2 02 2
respect for the integrity of the conscience as a undoubted potential to help humanity. But
fundamental and inalienable value of human they also have enormous potential risks when
beings (Goering et al., 2021; Ienca, 2021; J. ethics are subsumed to serving business in-
Illes & Hevia, 2021; Illes & Hossain, 2017; terests or military or political purposes. Even
Yuste et al., 2021). Chile, by the way, will be more when, in relation to all these develop-
ments, deregulation in the field of human
rights, is complete.
16 https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/c.
Faced with this reality, it is easy to be
php?g=363530&p=4783483 tempting to consider that these are conspir-
17 https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/ acy fantasies and that there is too much work
pf0000377897
288
30 ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL ISSUE
S E C T I O N I I I : P R E PA R I N G F O R T H E F U T U R E
In Regulating Neuroscience: Translational Legal Hofkirchner, W., & Kreowski, H.-J. (2021).
Challenges (1st ed., Vol. 4). Elsevier Inc. https:// Transhumanism : the proper guide to a posthuman
doi.org/10.1016/bs.dnb.2021.02.001 condition or a dangerous idea? Springer.
Cohen, E. (2014). Technology of Oppression: Preserving Hsu, N. S., Fang, H. Y., David, K. K., Gnadt, J. W.,
Freedom and Dignity in an Age of Mass,Warrantless Peng, G. C., Talley, E. M., Ward, J. M., Ngai,
Surveillance (Vol. 59). Palgrave McMillan. https:// J., & Koroshetz, W. J. (2020). The promise
doi.org/10.1057/9781137408211.0001 of the BRAIN initiative: NIH strategies for
Costa e Silva, J. A., & Steffen, R. E. (2017). The understanding neural circuit function. Current
future of psychiatry: brain devices. Metabolism: Opinion in Neurobiology, 65, 162–166. https://doi.
Clinical and Experimental, 69, S8–S12. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.conb.2020.10.008
org/10.1016/j.metabol.2017.01.010 Ienca, M. (2021). On Neurorights. Frontiers in
Crowley, M. (2016). Chemical Control. Regulation Human Neuroscience, 15(September). https://doi.
289
30 ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL ISSUE
S E C T I O N I I I : P R E PA R I N G F O R T H E F U T U R E
neuroscience: where do we stand? Current Vorontsova, D., Menshikov, I., Zubov, A., Orlov, K.,
Opinion in Neurobiology, 18(2), 223–227. https:// Rikunov, P., Zvereva, E., Flitman, L., Lanikin,
doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.006 A., Sokolova, A., Markov, S., & Bernadotte,
Risling, M. (2006). Detailed Examples of NLT : Radio A. (2021). Silent eeg-speech recognition using
Frequency Energy , Kinetic Energy and Electro- convolutional and recurrent neural network with
Muscular Devices (RTO-EN-HFM-145). 85% accuracy of 9 words classification. Sensors,
Salari, V., Rodrigues, S., Saglamyurek, E., Simon, 21(20), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21206744
C., & Oblak, D. (2022). Are Brain–Computer Walsh, K. (2014). Oxytocin, the “trust hormone”, could
Interfaces Feasible With Integrated Photonic become new interrogation tool.
Chips? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15(January), Wan, J., Zhou, S., Mea, H. J., Guo, Y., Ku, H.,
1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.780344 & Urbina, B. M. (2021). Emerging Roles of
Salles, A. (2021). Humanness: Some neuroethical Microfluidics in Brain Research: From Cerebral
reflections. In Regulating Neuroscience: Fluids Manipulation to Brain-on-a-Chip
Translational Legal Challenges (1st ed., Vol. and Neuroelectronic Devices Engineering.
4). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/ Chemical Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.
bs.dnb.2021.03.002 chemrev.1c00480
Schep, L. J., Slaughter, R. J., & McBride, D. I. Willett, F. R., Avansino, D. T., Hochberg, L. R.,
(2015). Riot control agents: The tear gases CN, Henderson, J. M., & Shenoy, K. V. (2021). High-
CS and OC-a medical review. Journal of the Royal performance brain-to-text communication via
Army Medical Corps, 161(2), 94–99. https://doi. handwriting. Nature, 593(7858), 249–254. https://
org/10.1136/jramc-2013-000165 doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03506-2
Stroud, N. J., & McGregor, S. C. (2019). Digital Wright, S. (2002). Future sub-lethal, incapacitating &
discussions: how big data informs political paralysing technologies: Their coming role in the
communication. Routledge. mass production of torture, cruel and degrading
United States Air Force Research Laboratory. (2002). treatment. Raft Paper Presented To The Expert
Biological effects of directed energy. AFRL-HE- Seminar On Security Equipment & The Prevention
BR-TR-2002-0226, 8(6), 41‐49. Of Torture, October, 1–26.
Verri, G. J., Bender, L., & Dondonis, E. (2014). Yuste, R., Genser, J., & Herrmann, S. (2021). It’s
Government and Corporative Internet Time for Neuro-Rights. Horizons, 18, 154–164.
Surveillance. World Summit on the Information Zúñiga-Fajuri, A., Miranda, L. V., Miralles, D.
Society Forum Power, 411–443. Z., & Venegas, R. S. (2021). Neurorights in
Verwey, W. D. (1977). Riot Control Agents and Chile: Between neuroscience and legal science.
Herbicides in War: Their Humanitarian, Toxicological, In Regulating Neuroscience: Translational Legal
Ecological, Military, Polemological, and Legal Challenges (1st ed., Vol. 4). Elsevier Inc. https://
Aspects. Sithjoff International Publishing. doi.org/10.1016/bs.dnb.2021.06.001
Volcler, J. (2013). Extremely Loud. Sound as weapon.
The New Press.
T O R T U R E Vo l um e 3 2 , N um be r 1 - 2, 20 2 2