Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Canadian 6th Edition Brealey Test Bank 1
Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Canadian 6th Edition Brealey Test Bank 1
Brealey
Full download at:
Solution Manual:
https://testbankpack.com/p/solution-manual-for-fundamentals-of-corporate-finance-canadian-6th-
edition-by-brealey-isbn-1259024962-9781259024962/
Test bank:
https://testbankpack.com/p/test-bank-for-fundamentals-of-corporate-finance-canadian-6th-edition-
by-brealey-isbn-1259024962-9781259024962/
TRUE/FALSE. Write 'T' if the statement is true and 'F' if the statement is false.
2) Accurate capital budgeting analysis depends on total cash flows as opposed to incremental cash
flows.
Answer: True False
3) Sunk costs influence capital budgeting decisions when the sunk costs exceed future cash inflows.
Answer: True False
4) Opportunity costs are evaluated for investment decisions at their historical (that is, book) cost.
Answer: True False
5) The method of financing a project affects the determination of its cash flows for capital budgeting
purposes.
Answer: True False
6) In project analysis, allocations of overhead should be limited to only those that represent additional
expense.
Answer: True False
7) Discounting real cash flows with real interest rates gives an overly optimistic idea of a project's
value.
Answer: True False
8) Suppose you finance a project partly with debt, you should neither subtract the debt proceeds from
the required investment, nor would you recognize the interest and principal payments on the debt as
cash outflows.
1
Answer: True False
9) When you finance a project partly with debt, you should still view the project as if it were all
equity-financed, treating all cash outflows required for the project as coming from stockholders, and
all cash inflows as going to them.
Answer: True False
10) Sunk costs remain the same whether or not you accept the project.
Answer: True False
12) If a project permits a reduction in the level of working capital, this reduction is assumed to increase
cash flows.
Answer: True False
2
13) When additional funds must be committed to working capital, those funds are assumed to be
recovered at the end of the project's life.
Answer: True False
14) As a project comes to its end, there is a disinvestment in working capital, which also generates
positive cash flow as inventories are sold off and accounts receivable are collected.
Answer: True False
15) The total depreciation tax shield equals the product of depreciation and the tax rate.
Answer: True False
16) Cash flow from operations = (revenues-cash expenses) × (1-tax rate) + (depreciation × tax rate).
Answer: True False
17) An asset's CCA class number affects its CCA dollar deduction amount from taxable income.
Answer: True False
18) When an asset class is terminated, there will be recaptured depreciation when the adjusted cost of
disposal from UCC of the asset class is a negative balance.
Answer: True False
19) Upon the sale of equipment at the end of its useful life, tax liability will be incurred whenever the
book value of the equipment exceeds the sales price.
Answer: True False
MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.
20) What is the undiscounted cash flow in the final year of an investment, assuming: 10,000 after-tax
cash flows from operations, the fully depreciated machine, the sole asset in the pool, is sold for
$1,000, the project had required $2,000 in additional working capital, and a 35 percent tax rate?
A) $14,000 B) $12,600 C) $12,650 D) $8,450
Answer: C
21) What is the NPV of a project that costs $100,000, provides $23,000 in cash flows annually for six
years, requires a $5,000 increase in net working capital, and depreciates the asset straight line over
six years while ignoring the half-year convention? The discount rate is 14%.
A) $13,283 B) -$13,283 C) $15,561 D) -$15,561
Answer: B
22) What is the NPV of a project that costs $100,000, provides $23,000 in cash flows annually for six
years, requires a $5,000 increase in net working capital, and depreciates the asset at 15 percent
declining balance over six years and sold at zero salvage value? The discount rate is 14 percent. The
tax rate is 40 percent.
A) -$13,283 B) $44,866 C) -$23,460 D) $13,283
Answer: C
3
23) What is the present value at a 10 percent discount rate of the depreciation tax shield for a firm in the
35 percent tax bracket that purchases a $50,000 asset being depreciated at 15 percent declining
balance with a half-year rule, disposed from the existing asset pool at zero?
A) $10,023 B) $17,500 C) $37,908 D) $10,866
Answer: A
24) Assume your firm has an unused machine that originally cost $75,000, has a book value of $20,000,
and is currently worth $25,000. Ignoring taxes, the correct opportunity cost for this machine in
capital budgeting decisions is:
A) $25,000. B) $5,000. C) $75,000. D) $20,000.
Answer: A
25) At current prices and a 13 percent cost of capital, a project's NPV is $100,000. By what minimum
amount must the initial cost of the project decrease (revenues will be unchanged) before you would
prefer to wait two years before investing?
A) $21,685 B) $26,000 C) $29,380 D) $27,690
Answer: D
26) A parcel of corporate land was recently dedicated as the new plant site. What cost allocation should
the land receive, based on the following: original cost of $200,000, market value of $300,000, net
book value of $200,000, a recent offer to purchase for $250,000?
A) $200,000 B) $300,000 C) $250,000 D) $275,000
Answer: B
27) A project that increased sales was accompanied by a $50,000 increase in inventory, a $20,000
increase in accounts receivable, and a $25,000 increase in accounts payable. Assuming these
amounts remain constant, by how much has net working capital increased?
A) $25,000 B) $45,000 C) $5,000 D) $30,000
Answer: B
28) For a profitable firm in the 35 percent marginal tax bracket with $100,000 of annual depreciation
expense, the depreciation tax shield would be:
A) $65,000. B) $35,000. C) $10,500. D) $30,000.
Answer: B
29) For a profitable firm in the 30% marginal tax bracket with $100,000 of annual depreciation expense,
the depreciation tax shield would be:
A) $30,000. B) $65,000. C) $35,000. D) $10,500.
Answer: A
30) What is the amount of the operating cash flow for a firm with $500,000 profit before tax, $100,000
depreciation expense, and a 35 percent marginal tax rate?
A) $325,000 B) $425,000 C) $260,000 D) $360,000
Answer: B
4
31) A project anticipates net cash flows of $10,000 at the end of year one, with such amount growing at
the expected 5 percent rate of inflation over the subsequent four years. Calculate the real present
value of this five-year cash stream if the firm employs a nominal discount rate of 15 percent.
A) $43,294 B) $55,000 C) $38,377 D) $33,522
Answer: C
32) Your forecast shows $500,000 annually in sales for each of the next three years. If your second and
third year predictions have failed to incorporate 5 percent expected annual inflation, how far off in
total dollars is your three-year forecast?
A) $76,250 B) $52,550 C) $25,000 D) $50,000
Answer: A
33) Your forecast shows $500,000 annually in sales for each of the next three years. If your second and
third year predictions have failed to incorporate 2.5% expected annual inflation, how far off in total
dollars is your three-year forecast?
A) $50,000 B) $37,813 C) $52,550 D) $76,250
Answer: B
34) A firm generates sales of $250,000, depreciation expense of $50,000, taxable income of $50,000,
and has a 35 percent tax rate. By how much does net cash flow deviate from net income?
A) $67,500 B) $82,500 C) $50,000 D) $17,500
Answer: C
35) What is the amount of the annual depreciation tax shield for a firm with $200,000 in net income,
$75,000 in depreciation expense and a 35 percent marginal tax rate?
A) $70,000 B) $75,000 C) $43,750 D) $26,250
Answer: D
37) Which of the following is not accurate in depicting cash flows from operations?
A) (Revenues - expenses - taxes paid)
B) (Revenues - cash expenses - taxes paid)
C) (Revenues - expenses) (1 - tax rate) + (depreciation × tax rate)
D) (Net profit + depreciation)
Answer: A
5
Another document from Scribd.com that is
random and unrelated content:
more insolent and exacting. The expenses soon rose above £8,000, and
the question whether these treaties were more for the benefit of the
Proprietaries in buying lands than for the safety of the inhabitants gave
rise to heated controversy. The result was that Indian affairs began to
take a wider and more public range, and the records of those days begin
to throw more light upon the uninhabited interior of the Province.
As early as 1722 we read that “William Wilkins was 150 miles up the
Sasquehannah trading for his master.” His master was John Cartlidge, an
Indian trader living at Conestoga, and 150 miles farther up the
Susquehanna was a venturesome trip at that date. There are also records
of several Frenchmen engaged in the trade living among the Indians east
of the mountains, extending their travels up the Susquehanna and its
branches.
A great council was held in Philadelphia, July 3, 1727, with the chiefs
of the Six Nations, but most of those in attendance were Cayuga,
Conestoga and Ganawese. Madame Montour, the celebrated interpreter,
was present at this conference and exerted her great influence toward an
amicable treaty.
In an address made by one of the chiefs to the Governor, he said:
“They desire that there may be no settlements made up the Sasquhannah
higher than Pextan (Harrisburg), and that none of the settlers thereabouts
be suffered to sell or keep any rum there, for that being the road by
which their people go out to war, they are apprehensive of mischief if
they meet with liquor in these parts. They desire also, for the same
reasons, that none of the traders be allowed to carry any rum to the
remoter parts where James Le Tort trades,—that is, Allegany on the
branch of Ohio. And this they desire may be taken notice of, as the mind
of the chiefs of all the Five Nations, for it is all those nations that now
speak by them to all our people.”
The following day the Governor made this reply: “We have not
hitherto allowed any settlements to be made above Pextan, but, as the
young people grow up, they will spread, of course, yet it will not be very
speedily. The Governor, however, will give orders to them all to be civil
to those of the Five Nations as they pass that way, though it would be
better if they would pass the Susquehannah above the mountains. And
the sale of rum shall be prohibited both there and at Alegany; but the
woods are so thick and dark we cannot see what is done in them. The
Indians may stave any rum they find in the Woods, but, as has been said,
they must not drink or carry any away.”
The interesting fact ascertained from these two addresses is that James
Le Tort, who had settled near Carlisle, as early as 1720, and was a well
known trader, had already passed over the Allegheny Mountains and
established his trading post on the Ohio River. As he was also known to
have lived and traded as early as 1701 on the island at the Forks of the
Susquehanna, long known as Packer’s Island, between Sunbury and
Northumberland, it may be fairly inferred that Le Tort found his way to
the West through the West Branch Valley and thence by the Indian path
leading from Great Island through what is now Clearfield and Kittaning
to the west.
This is interesting also because it was at this time that the Shawnee
began to pass over the mountains, followed by some Delaware,
especially those of Conestoga descent, and began to settle on the Ohio.
The Shawnee had established a large village at the mouth of
Chillisquaque Creek, where it empties into the West Branch, a mile
below Lewisburg on the east side of the stream.
The second inference is that at the date of the above conference there
were white people already seated on the Juniata and Susquehanna,
farther west than Paxtang, or there were already such decided symptoms
of danger in that direction that the Iroquois deputies considered it
necessary to forbid that anyone should presume to settle beyond the
Kittatinny Mountains. A violation of this precautionary restriction led to
a series of complaints about intruders into these valleys for the next
thirty years.
During the first quarter of the eighteenth century the history of Indian
affairs on the Susquehanna and Juniata, and especially the West Branch
of the former river, is nearly all connected closely with the Iroquois
agency on the northern border of the Province.
The principal representatives of this great Nation were Allummapees,
also called Sassoonan, the great Delaware King, and Shikellamy, the
great Oneida vicegerent.
Allummapees resided at Paxtang, as early as 1709. He removed from
Paxtang to Shamokin about 1718, and there resided among the Munsee,
the most belligerent of the Lenape clans. He ruled as king from 1718 till
his death. He was a good-hearted chieftain, true to the English and an
advocate of peace. When he died he was supposed to be one hundred
years of age. His death occurred August 12, 1731, when in a state of
helpless intoxication he was stabbed to the heart by his nephew,
Shockatawlin, of whom Allummapees was jealous.
Indians Massacre Major John Lee and
Family, August 13, 1782
n the evening of August 13, 1782, John Lee and his family with
one or two neighbors were seated at the supper table in their
comfortable log home in what is now Winfield, Union County.
Without a moment’s warning a band of Indians, supposed to
be sixty or seventy in number, rushed in on them, and killed
Lee and his family. The events of this crime rank among the
most cruel and revolting of those along the frontier.
A young woman, named Katy Stoner, hurried upstairs and concealed
herself behind the chimney, where she remained undiscovered and
escaped. She related the details of this horrible tragedy.
Lee was tomahawked and scalped, and an old man named John
Walker shared the same fate. Mrs. Claudius Boatman and daughter, who
were guests of the Lees, were killed and scalped; Mrs. Lee, with her
small child, and a larger boy, named Thomas, were led away captives.
The savages fled from the scene along the Great Path, leading up that
side of the West Branch Valley, over the White Deer Mountains, and then
crossed to the eastern side of the river below Muncy.
One of Lee’s sons, Robert, happened to be absent and thus escaped the
fate of his parents. He was returning, however, and came in sight of the
house just as the Indians were leaving it, but they did not observe him.
He fled to Northumberland and gave the alarm.
A party of about twenty volunteers was organized by Colonel Samuel
Hunter, at Fort Augusta, and hastened in pursuit. On arriving at Lee’s
house they beheld some of the victims yet alive and writhing in agony.
Lee was not dead, and Mrs. Boatman’s daughter also survived. Litters
were hastily constructed, and they were carried to Fort Augusta. Lee
expired in great agony soon after arrival at the fort. Miss Boatman was
nursed back to health and lived many years afterwards.
Colonel Hunter and his party, without delaying to bury the dead,
pushed on after the savages as rapidly as possible with a view of
overtaking them, and releasing the captives. They came in sight of them
above Lycoming Creek.
In crossing White Deer Mountains Mrs. Lee was accidentally bitten on
her ankle by a rattlesnake, and her leg became so swollen and pained her
so severely, that she traveled with great difficulty. The Indians, finding
themselves pursued, urged her along as fast as possible, but she
weakened rapidly. When near the mouth of Pine Creek, about four miles
below the present Jersey Shore, Mrs. Lee’s strength failed her and she
seated herself on the ground.
The whites were rapidly approaching and the Indians were afraid she
would fall into their hands. A warrior stealthily slipped up behind her,
placed the muzzle of his rifle close to her head and fired. The entire
upper portion of her head was blown off. One of the Indians then
snatched up her young child and holding it by the feet, dashed it against
a tree.
The Indians then fled with renewed speed, crossing the river at
Smith’s fording, at Level Corner, and hurried up through Nippenose
Valley.
When Colonel Hunter and his men came up to where Mrs. Lee was
murdered her body was yet warm. The sight was horrible. The child was
but little injured, but was found moaning piteously.
The pursuit was now so hot that near Antes’ Gap, the Indians
separated, and ran up both sides of the mountains. Colonel Hunter
concluded that further pursuit was imprudent, and the chase was
abandoned.
The detail returned, buried the body of Mrs. Lee, and brought back the
child. At Lee’s house they halted and buried the dead there.
Young Thomas Lee who was taken prisoner, was not recovered for
many years afterwards. The son, Robert, made arrangements with the
Indians to bring his brother to Tioga Point, where he was delivered to his
friends. Such was the love of Indian life, however, that he was so
reluctant to return, they were obliged to bind him and place him in a
canoe. When near Wilkes Barre they untied him, but as soon as the canoe
touched shore he darted off like a deer. It was several hours before he
was retaken. On arriving at Northumberland he evinced all the sullenness
of a captive. Indian boys and girls, near his own age were made to play
about him for days before he showed any disposition to join with them.
At last he began to inquire the names of things, and by degrees he
became civilized, obtained a good education, and lived a useful life.
Thomas lived on the home farm for many years, as is proved by a
deed which he and his wife, Eliza, executed April 1, 1797, to William
Beard and Sarah, his wife. Robert Lee and his descendants lived on part
of the property as late as the beginning of the 19th century.
The massacre at Lee’s home resulted in the death of seven persons,
and only four of the six taken captive were returned to their kin. The
others were two sisters and a brother, liberated in 1785.
Since the beginning of spring in the year 1782, there had been sixty-
two inhabitants butchered by the Indians.
Judge John Joseph Henry, in a letter to Secretary of War, says that
when his father was returning home from Congress, then sitting in New
York (1784–85), he found Rebecca Lee on the road desolate and
moneyless. He took her to his own home in Lancaster, and, a few months
later, restored her to their brother, Robert, at Northumberland. The sister
was recovered at Albany a year later, and Thomas was turned over to his
brother in 1788.
Lee was the assessor in the township in which he lived. The Indians
hated him because they believed he had cheated them in a trade and they
sought an opportunity for revenge.
Lee was a prominent citizen, a major in the Northumberland militia,
February 7, 1776, and December 26, following, when a company
volunteered for the main army, Lee was chosen captain. The company
was attached to Colonel James Potter’s Second Battalion and saw much
active service.
Claudius Boatman was a Frenchman and after the massacre of his
wife, he took the remainder of his family, in 1786, and settled far up Pine
Creek. He had several daughters, one of whom married John English.
Claudius died in 1802, and was buried in the village of Waterville.
rom 1826 to 1838 may be termed the Anti-Masonic period, for during
those eventful years bigotry ran wild, while superstition and fanaticism,
like the demons of old, took possession of the many. They were the
halcyon days for broken-down politicians to ride into power
and place.
Seizing the opportunity, these demagogues originated a
political party, whose platform denounced all secret societies,
particularly the Freemasons, as destructive of every principle
of religion, justice and good government.
During the years 1823 to 1826 there resided in Western New York one
William Morgan, a native of Virginia, by trade a stone mason.
It has been represented that he was a veteran of the War of 1812, but
he earned his title of Captain as the owner of a fishing smack, with
piratical tendencies, which plied along the gulf coast.
In 1825 “Captain” Morgan was residing in Batavia, N. Y., where a
poor printer, named Wilbur, concocted with Morgan to publish a book
containing the revelations of Freemasonry, which was in fact the copy of
a volume formerly published in England in 1750, under the title “Jachin
and Boaz.”
As would be expected, the announcement of the publication of the
book in question wrought up members of the Masonic fraternity to fever
heat. Efforts to suppress the work were freely discussed, and some even
proposed doing so by force if it could not be done otherwise.
The respectable part of the fraternity, supposing that no book of that
kind would really be published, and, like a nine days’ wonder, if it was,
would soon vanish and wholly disappear, took little or no interest in the
matter. While they were folding their arms, an inconsiderate scheme was
developed by individuals for suppressing by force the contemplated
work.
But at this time Morgan was arrested for debt, September 12, 1826,
and placed in a carriage and driven to Rochester. That was the last ever
seen of him.
Morgan’s sudden disappearance caused great excitement, and gossips
gave out the statement that Freemasons had conveyed him to Fort
Niagara, while others claimed they had drowned him in Lake Ontario.
Public meetings were held and finally a reprobate named Edward
Giddings spread the sensational story that Freemasons had abducted and
foully put Morgan to death.
At this time the body of a man was washed ashore on Lake Ontario,
and a week after interment the body was exhumed and a second inquest
determined that “William Morgan had come to his death by drowning.”
The corpse did not, in any particular, resemble Morgan, but the crowd
determined that “it was a good enough Morgan until after election.” This
body was identified as that of Timothy Monroe, who had drowned
September 26. The remains were buried by his widow.
This should have ended the Morgan excitement but it did no such
thing. “A lie well stuck to is more convincing than the truth.” So a most
infamous deception was practiced upon the people.
Prosecutions were instituted against those who were supposed to have
anything to do with the abduction of Morgan. Many trials resulted, but
no murder was ever established.
What had become of Morgan? Was he drowned or murdered?
As early as September 26, 1826, the “Intelligencer,” of Harrisburg, as
well as other newspapers, cautioned the Masonic fraternity against “a
man calling himself Captain Morgan, as he is a swindler and a dangerous
man.”
It has been authentically settled that after the night of the so-called
abduction, being threatened with numerous suits for debt and other
misdemeanors, Morgan left the country of his own free will, going
directly to Australia, the passage money being furnished him. Arriving in
that far distant clime, he established a newspaper, but died ten years later.
A son, who accompanied him, continued the business, and was living
just prior to our Civil War.
The Freemasons of New York State, as a body and individually,
disclaimed all knowledge of any abduction of “Captain” Morgan.
By 1828 the Anti-Masonic movement had gained such impetus in
New York that a candidate for governor was placed on their ticket. Anti-
Masonic tickets were named in Massachusetts, Vermont and Ohio.
In 1829 the storm broke out in Pennsylvania, and was first felt in the
little town of New Berlin, Union County, where Lafayette Lodge No.
194 was holding a public procession August 18. The speakers for the
occasion were Hon. Jesse Merrill, General Henry Frick, Henry C. Eyer,
Reverend Just Henry Fries, Reverend John Kessler and Reverend Henry
Piggott. Henry W. and George A. Snyder, distinguished sons of former
Governor Simon Snyder, were officers of the lodge and had arranged the
program.
The meeting was broken up by the hostile action of a mob. It was
these same people who sent Ner Middlesworth, that great exponent of
Anti-Masonry to the General Assembly; it was also in New Berlin where
the first Anti-Masonic newspapers were established.
Joseph Ritner was placed in nomination for the office of Governor by
the Anti-Masonic convention, which met in Harrisburg in 1829, and he
received 51,000 votes, only 30,000 less than his successful opponent,
George Wolf.
A national convention was held in Baltimore September, 1831, which
placed a complete ticket in the field. In 1832 the Anti-Masons of
Pennsylvania again placed Joseph Ritner in nomination, but he was again
defeated by Governor Wolf, but two years later the Anti-Masons gained
control of the Legislature, and under the capable leadership of Thaddeus
Stevens, made political history in the Keystone State.
In the election of October, 1835, Joseph Ritner was elected, and with
both branches of the General Assembly, the Anti-Masons were
determined to carry out their various unlawful measures with a high
hand.
The Stevens Legislative investigation held December, 1835, proved to
be a fiasco, as the inquisition failed to disclose a single unlawful act
upon the part of any member of the order of Freemasons or Odd Fellows.
By 1838 the clouds of ignorant oppression had cleared away, and the
people, who cared to do so, could unite with either secret organization
without fear of social ostracism or political suicide.
York County and Its Part in the Revolution,
Erected August 19, 1749
fter the close of the Revolution the country west of the Ohio
was still occupied with Indian tribes ever ready to bring
devastation, destruction, and desolation to the homes of the
border settlers, and ever incited and aided by the British, who
held a number of posts along the lakes. The Indians had
determined the Ohio River should be the permanent boundary
between them and the United States.
President Washington sent Generals Josiah Harmar and Arthur St.
Clair in succession to command troops selected to overawe them, and
each in turn experienced bitter defeat by the savages. Washington then
sent for General Anthony Wayne and in April, 1782, placed him in
command of the Army of the United States.
Wayne understood his mission. He organized his “Legion” in
Pittsburgh, June, 1792, consisting of only 2,631 troops recruited from
Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia and New Jersey. Pennsylvania
furnished all but 232 of the command.
Wayne inaugurated strict discipline. Two soldiers were shot down for
sleeping on their posts. Whiskey was forbidden in the camp and
drunkenness severely punished. He insisted upon cleanliness and
regularity of diet. He taught the use of the bayonet and the sword. He
dined with his officers, and carefully planned every detail of his
expedition with their full knowledge.
Wayne had Chief Cornplanter, ninety Choctaw and twenty-five
Chicasaw Indians with him, whom he used to sow dissension among the
hostile Indians.
The war lasted more than two years during which time there were
periods of four and five months that he was without communication with
the seat of government. The Government viewed this Indian war with
alarm, and not without cause, as two previous defeats made the outcome
doubtful.
While the hostile Indians were perfecting their combinations the
Government sent commissioners to Fort Erie to sue for peace. The result
was that the Indians gained the time they needed, then refused to treat at
all, and the burden fell upon Wayne to see that the commissioners
reached their homes with their scalps on their heads, for which they
formally gave him thanks.
On October 13 he had marched to a point on the Miami River, eighty
miles north of Cincinnati, where he found a camp which he fortified and
called Greenville and remained there through the winter. From this camp
he sent out scouts and spies to secure intelligence and scalps. He also
sent a force to the field where St. Clair had been defeated to bury the
bones of the dead and erect a stockade called Fort Recovery.
In May a lieutenant with a convoy gallantly charged and repulsed an
assault. About seventeen hundred of the enemy made a desperate attempt
June 13, to capture an escort under the walls of Fort Recovery and to
carry the Fort by storm, keeping up a heavy fire and making repeated
efforts for two days, but were finally repulsed. Twenty-one soldiers were
killed and twenty-nine wounded.
A few days later, after receiving reinforcements of mounted men from
Kentucky, General Wayne marched seventy miles in the heart of the
Indian country, built Fort Defiance, and then within sight of a British fort
on the Miami River made his preparations for the battle which was
inevitable.
He had marched nearly four hundred miles through the country of an
enemy, both watchful and vindictive; had cut a road through the woods
the entire way, upon a route longer, more remote and more surrounded
with dangers than that of Braddock; had overcome almost insuperable
difficulties in securing supplies; had built three forts, and now had
reached a position where the issue must be decided by arms.
On the morning of August 20, 1794, the army advanced five miles,
with the Miami on the right, a brigade of mounted volunteers on the left,
a light brigade in their rear, and a selected battalion of horsemen in the
lead. They came to a place where a tornado had swept through the forest,
and thrown down the trees, since called Fallen Timbers, and where the
twisted trunks and uprooted trees lay in such profusion as to impede the
movements of the cavalry.
Here the Indians, two thousand in number, encouraged by the
proximity of the British fort, determined to make a stand. Hidden in the
woods and the high grass, they opened fire upon the mounted men in
front and succeeded in driving them back to the main army. The enemy
were formed in three lines in supporting distance of each other,
extending two miles at right angles to the river and were protected and
covered by the woods.
Wayne formed his force in two lines. He saw the enemy was strong in
numbers and intended to turn his flank, and met this situation by
ordering up the rear line to support the first, by sending a force by a
circuitous route to turn the right of the enemy; by sending another force
at the same time along the river to turn their left, and by a direct charge
in the front to drive the Indians from their covert with the bayonet.
The Indians could not stand this attack, broke in confusion, and were
driven two miles in the course of an hour through the woods with great
loss. Their dead bodies and the British muskets lay scattered in all
directions. All of the village, corn fields and houses, including that of
Alexander McKee, the British Indian agent, within a scope of one
hundred miles were burned and destroyed.
American annals disclose no such other victory over the savage tribes.
It secured for civilization the territory between the Ohio and Mississippi
Rivers. It made possible the development of such states as Ohio, Indiana
and Illinois.
When the news reached London, the British Government, recognizing
that the cause of the Indians was hopeless, ordered the evacuation of the
posts at Detroit, Oswego and Niagara.
Two weeks later General Wayne was crushed to earth by a falling tree,
so much bruised as to cause great pain and hemorrhages, and only the
fortunate location of a stump, on which the tree finally rested, saved his
life.
After the treaty of cession and peace had been executed, and after an
absence in the wilderness for three years, he returned home in 1795,
everywhere hailed with loud acclaim as the hero of the time and received
in Philadelphia by the City Troop and with salvos from cannon, ringing
of bells and fireworks.
His last battle had been fought. His work was done. “Both body and
mind were fatigued by the contest,” were his pathetic words. Soon
afterwards the President sent him as a commissioner to Detroit and on
his return he died at Presque Isle, now Erie, December 15, 1796.
Chief Tedyuskung Annoys Moravian Brethren;
Arrives at Bethlehem
August 21, 1756
edyuskung, the great king of the Delaware tribe and one of the
most powerful of the Indian sachems in Pennsylvania, much
enjoyed the prominence he gained by frequent councils and
conferences with the Governor and other Provincial
dignitaries, even at the expense of causing a great jealousy
among Indian chiefs of other nations. He was a skilled
diplomat, a good speaker and a friend of the English, yet he was rather
crafty in his dealings with both the whites and his own race, and was
given over to excessive intemperance.
At the conclusion of the great treaty held at Easton, July 24–31, 1756,
the Governor and others in authority doubted the sincerity of
Tedyuskung, but he satisfied them on that score, and during August
remained almost constantly in or about Fort Allen on a drunken debauch.
Finally on August 21, he removed with his retinue to Bethlehem, where
his wife, Elizabeth, and her three young children determined to remain,
while the King went on an expedition to the Minisinks to put a stop to
some Indian depredations.
Tedyuskung went from there to Wyoming and sent word to Major
Parsons, at Easton, that he wanted his wife and children sent to him.
Major Parsons went immediately to Bethlehem and made known the
King’s desire to his wife, but she decided to remain where she was. This
then was the cause of frequent visits to Bethlehem, where Tedyuskung
much annoyed the Moravian Brethren, who were not in position to
control his actions when he was their unwelcome visitor.
July, 1757, he was for some time in and about Fort Allen and then in
attendance at the second great conference at Easton, during which time
his wife and children were with him. Two days after this conference
closed Tedyuskung, his family and others went to Bethlehem. Reichel, in
his “Memorials of the Moravian Church,” says:
“Some of these unwelcome visitors halted for a few days, and some
proceeded as far as Fort Allen and then returned, undecided as to where
to go and what to do. During the month full 200 were counted—men,
women and children—among them lawless crowds who annoyed the
Brethren by depredations, molested the Indians at the Manakasy, and
wrangled with each other over their cups at ‘The Crown’.”
Tedyuskung tarried in Bethlehem several days when he set out on a
mission to Tioga, but on the way he was met by messengers from the
Ohio Indians, who bore such glad tidings that the King determined he
should go to Philadelphia and appraise the Governor and Council of the
good news.
At Bethlehem Tedyuskung spent a few days with his wife and family,
meantime holding a conference with Bishop Spangenberg, Reverend
Mack and other Moravian Brethren—Augustus, the christianized
Delaware chief serving as interpreter. Tedyuskung inquired of the
Moravians why the converted Indians could not move to Wyoming.
Bishop Spangenberg told him they would require a town of their own,
where a school and church could be built. The king said these should be
built there.
He then surprised the Brethren by telling them that reports had been
circulated among the Indians that the Moravians had decapitated the
Indians among them, placed their heads in bags and sent them to
Philadelphia. These charges had so exasperated the Indians that they
conspired to attack the Brethren’s settlements and cut off the inhabitants
without regard to age or sex. He and Paxinoso had on one occasion
persuaded 200 warriors, who had banded together for this purpose, to
desist from their design.
After his interview with the Governor and Council in Philadelphia,
Tedyuskung returned to Bethlehem, where he remained with his wife and
children until October 7 when he again went to Philadelphia.
During all her sojourn in Bethlehem the King’s wife was maintained
by the Moravian Brethren at the expense of the Province. Tedyuskung
was back in Bethlehem in about ten days and remained until the 27th,
when they set out for Wyoming, where the Commissioners were daily
expected to build a fort and some houses for the Delaware.
Having previously signified to the Moravian Brethren at Bethlehem
his desire to spend the winter at Bethlehem, permission for him and his
family to do so was reluctantly granted. Thereupon, upon his return from
New Jersey, a lodge was built for him near “The Crown” inn. There he
held court and gave audience to the wild embassies that would come
from the Indian country.
In addition to Tedyuskung and his family nearly one hundred Indians
spent the winter of 1757–58 in the neighborhood of “The Crown.”
Reichel says: “Government was imposing an additional burden upon the
Brethren when it committed this lawless crowd to their keeping * * * We
are at a loss how to act. Furthermore, we are told that some of our
neighbors are growing uneasy at our receiving such murdering Indians,
as they style them. I fear we shall be obliged to set watches to keep such
of them off as are disposed to quarrel with, or may attempt to hurt any of
them.”
Tedyuskung attended a long conference in Philadelphia in the early
part of 1758, and made trips to and from Bethlehem for this purpose.
He was back in Bethlehem in April, and on the 17th sent a number of
the Delaware, who had wintered in the Moravian town, to Fort Allen,
there to join Captain Jacob Arndt’s soldiers in ranging the frontiers. He
also sent his sons, Captains John Jacob and Amos and three other
Delaware over the Allegheny to the Indians towns of the Delaware and
Shawnee.
Tedyuskung remained in Bethlehem, and Justice Horsfield wrote on
April 18: “I never before was so much convinced of Tedyuskung’s zeal
for the English cause.” Five days later, however, a soldier came to
Bethlehem from Fort Allen with a letter from Captain Arndt in which he
stated that he was having trouble with the Indians sent to the fort by
Tedyuskung—the messengers, who were still there, as well as those who
were to range being continually drunk, having brought with them some
casks of rum from Easton.
Tedyuskung made another trip to Philadelphia in May to urge the
Governor to again send the Commissioners to finish the fort and the
houses. He returned to Bethlehem about May 8.
Reichel says: “When the swelling of the maple buds and the whitening
of the shad-bush on the river’s bank betokened the advent of Spring,
there were busy preparations going on in Tedyuskung’s company over
the matter of their long-expected removal to the Indian Eldorado on the
flats of the Winding River. It was the 16th of cornplanting month (May),
the month called Tauwinipen, when the Delaware King, his Queen, his
counsellors and his warriors led by the Commissioners, took up the line
of march for Fort Allen, beyond there to strike the Indian trail that led
over the mountains to Wyoming Valley—and on the going out of these
spirits ‘The Crown’ was swept and garnished and Ephriam Colver, the
publican, had rest.”
Gilbert Family in Indian Captivity Twenty-nine
Months Released August 22,1782