1 Republic of the Philippines

2 Department of Education
3 REGION III
4 SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF PAMPANGA
5 SAN ISIDRO HIGH SCHOOL
6 BACOLOR, PAMPANGA
7

1 Research Proposal

2 Title Face to face learning: An impact to SISH

3 students before and after pandemic

4 Jose, justine M, Evaristo ,shaynne ann M, Hernandez

5 daniel M, (Venson, willbert)
6
1
7 Affiliation 1; e-mail@e-mail.com
2
8 Affiliation 2; justinejose433@gmail.com
9 * Correspondence: e-mail@e-mail.com; Tel.: 09272539507
10
11 01 2023

12 Abstract: A single paragraph of about 200 words maximum. For the proposal abstract, the
13 abstracts should give a pertinent overview and scope of the work. A semi-structured abstract
14 without headings should be used. Organization of the abstract should be as follows: 1)
15 Background: Place the question addressed in a broad context and highlight the purpose of the
16 study; 2) Methods:

17 Keywords: keyword 1; keyword 2; keyword 3 (List three to ten pertinent keywords specific to the
18 article; yet reasonably common within the subject discipline.)
19

20 1. Introduction

21 The transfer from face-to-face (F2F) to on line (ONL) better training might be visible as a
22 tremendously latest phenomena. The better training facility in which this observe become
23 performed will be known as Institution A for the sake of this essay. Even aleven though there
24 were severa tries to introduce ONL, coaching and getting to know have traditionally simplest
25 been carried out in a face-to-face setting. The conventional shape of getting to know, face-to-face
26 (F2F), and ONL had been by no means completely realized. dominated. Regarding the right
27 implementation of ONL, there had been severa discussions, mainly amongst policymakers. In
28 January 2020, a pilot software become placed into location. Finally, ONL become made to be had
29 in some of subjects. This brand-new technique to coaching and getting to know acquired
30 enthusiastic help from many individuals who had been completely devoted to it. The new on
31 line platform for coaching and getting to know become strongly recommended for teachers and
32 college students.

33

34 This idea become endured with excellent enthusiasm via way of means of many professors and
35 college students. At first, there had been troubles like terrible connectivity and an absence of
36 laptops and PCs for teachers and college students. Additionally, a few instructors and college
 8

37 students struggled to govern the platform properly. Some of those issues had been effectively
38 resolved as time went on. No one listened to the scholars' concerns, despite the fact that ONL
39 endured to generate a variety of interest. They commenced to voice their evaluations
40 approximately ONL.

41

42 The evaluations of the scholars concerning the blessings and downsides of the use of ONL
43 reports had been now no longer heard. Students commenced to impeach their perceptions of the
44 transfer from F2F to ONL. Some in their voices are indexed below: "Great! now no longer
45 required to wait faculty or pay for printingBecause I already pay for my laptop, internet, and
46 assignments every month, none of these items are expensive. No greater cost for me. For me,
47 buying on line is much less expensive. "Oh well, to be honest, the elegance is extra interactive
48 than buying on line. insufficient communication "There are hurdles to communication," those
49 voices say, describing the problems a few college students have switching from face-to-face to on
50 line preparation at Institution in san isidro excessive faculty bacolor. Since there's an absence of
51 statistics approximately their reports withinside the neighborhood literature, their voices are
52 fairly important. Additionally, it's far believed that after formulating policies to govern ONL,
53 policymakers have to recall their reports.At this institution, academic rules are often imposed
54 with very little scholar input. Thus, permitting college students to freely and sincerely
55 percentage their mind is the primary aim of this observe. If extra applications are carried out
56 thru ONL, their reports can also additionally have an effect on and resource coverage makers on
57 this manner. Therefore, if extra ONL alternatives are supplied, this observe can also additionally
58 serve to indicate the manner forward.

59

60 Thus, this studies cautiously investigated the transition of fifteen undergraduates at some point
61 of the semester January to May 2020, at Institution A in Trinidad and Tobago. During this
62 semester teachers and college students actively participated in ONL which become simplest
63 supplied thru Google Classroom. Keeping this goal intently in mind, that's the shift from F2F
64 toFace-to-face getting to know (F2F) is a coaching/getting to know technique that, in step with
65 Qureshi (2019) and Miles et al. (2018), improves the coaching/getting to know manner thru
66 interpersonal contact. Students and instructors can also additionally expand a help machine
67 because of those encounters. In a familiar, conventional study room context, college students can
68 also additionally sense extra comfortable and research extra quickly. Through those exchanges,
69 they'll additionally advantage get entry to to extra statistics and enhance their comprehension of
70 the route topics.

71

72 A comparable point of view become offered via way of means of Kirkup and Jones (1996), who
73 asserted that it become absolutely viable to set up this feel of camaraderie among college
74 students and instructors in an F2F getting to know environment. Chen (1997) agreed with this
75 point of view and stated that interactions now no longer simplest enabled college students to
76 assess their very own getting to know however additionally supplied in addition help.helped
77 them create a real feel of camaraderie among themselves. Additionally, this network and
78 fraternity can now and again improve college students' intelligence, confidence, and capacity to
79 deal with troubles associated with getting to know alone. F2F gives scholars a much broader
80 variety of getting to know opportunities. The maximum traditional fashion of preparation is
81 face-to-face (F2F), which includes the lecturer disseminating expertise to the scholars (Bandara
82 and Wijekularathna, 2017). It commonly takes location in a bodily contained study room. Every
83 day, training are held in a lot of times, from early withinside the morning to past due withinside

9
 10

84 the day. The the front of the study room commonly has a whiteboard and furnishings that may
85 accommodate each instructors and pupil.

86

87 One requirement for ONL is the distribution of observe substances to college students thru a
88 getting to know control machine, that's commonly created via way of means of an outdoor
89 source, together with Google Classroom (Pozzi et al., 2019). Students are bodily separated from
90 instructors and the faculty, and they may be mainly in fee in their very own training (Bagriacik,
91 2019). The consultation might be scholar-targeted relying at the form of observe or concern
92 matter. This mainly relies upon at the cloth to be trained and the way well-versed the scholars
93 are withinside the complexity of the concern matter. However, one in every of ONL's number
94 one desires is to enhance the ease and versatility of the scholar-instructor relationship (Bandara
95 and Wijekularathna, 2017). Classes are methodically deliberate after near interplay with
96 professors and college students.a second that works for each parties. Additionally, they may be
97 recorded and made handy so that scholars can also additionally, if required, revisit them
98 afterwards (Fish and Snodgrass, 2019; Qureshi, 2019). The aforementioned illustrates the
99 similarities and variations among F2F and ONL. The goal of this observe is to research extra
100 approximately college students' reports with the transfer from face-to-face to on line getting to
101 know, aleven though.

102 2. Study Objectives

103 2.1. General Objective

104 2.2. Specific Objectives

105 3. Methods

106 This section may vary between disciplines. Program chairs may refer to the usual content of
107 the methods section in some of the articles published in the respective disciplines. In general, this
108 section is composed of:

109 3.1. Study Design

110 3.2. Study Participants

111 3.2.1. Sample size

112 3.2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

113 3.4. (Specific Procedures Based on Study Objectives)

114

115

116 3.4.1. Ethical Considerations

117 State the issuing agency for the ethics clearance or exemption from ethics review.

118 3.4.2. Procedure 1

119 3.4.3. Procedure 2

11
 12

120 3.4.4. (Add more sections to this as needed)

121 4. Statistical Analysis of Data

122 Materials and Methods should be described with sufficient details to allow others to replicate
123 and build on published results. New methods and protocols should be described in detail while
124 well-established methods can be briefly described and appropriately cited.
125 Interventionary studies involving animals or humans, and other studies require ethical
126 approval must list the authority that provided approval and the corresponding ethical approval
127 code.
128

129 5. References
130 References must follow the APA format. Use of Mendeley is highly suggested.

13