Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Prepis D Johnson A Bianchi H Godicke B
A Prepis D Johnson A Bianchi H Godicke B
A Prepis D Johnson A Bianchi H Godicke B
Consolidated Summary
This document represents a consolidated summary of the main working documents1 prepared
for the Donors Conference. It has been designed so as to facilitate the reader’s access to the
essential facts of the monuments and sites under consideration: for each subject, concise
data have been summarized concerning its history, its significance, its present condition, the
proposed interventions as well as the amount of funds required for restoration, rehabilitation
or reconstruction.
In order to obtain more detailed information on the sites and monuments, references to the
descriptions contained in the reports have been provided.
The order in which the monuments and sites are presented in this document does not in any
way reflect the degree of priority for restoration, rehabilitation or reconstruction works, nor
does it suggest any preference of monuments or sites related to a given community. The
numbering of the sites has been provided solely for easy identification of the monuments or
sites.
The estimated amount required for the works recommended on all monuments and sites is in
the order of 40,000,000 €. However, in several cases the experts who prepared the reports
have recommended a limited amount for carrying out preliminary studies prior to large-scale
interventions. Once these studies have been conducted and the corresponding projects
prepared, the restoration, rehabilitation or reconstruction works on all monuments and sites
will require significantly larger sums.
In one of the main working documents (UNESCO 2004 report), estimated costs are
expressed in US Dollars, whereas all other reports provide estimates in Euros. As the official
currency used in Kosovo is the Euro, total figures provided in this document are expressed in
that currency.
This document has been prepared by an ad-hoc inter-agency group of experts designated
jointly by UNESCO, the Council of Europe and UNMIK, with the participation of experts from
Belgrade and Pristina.
1
These working documents are available on the internet:
UNESCO
1. 2003 Report – Cultural Heritage in Kosovo : Protection and Conservation of a Multi-Ethnic Heritage in Danger
www.unesco.org/culture/heritage/kosovo1
2. 2004 Report - Cultural Heritage in Kosovo : Protection and Conservation of a Multi-Ethnic Heritage in Danger
www.unesco.org/culture/heritage/kosovo2
Council of Europe
1. May 2004 Report – Preliminary Technical Assessment on the religious buildings/ensembles in Kosovo damaged in March 2004
www.coe.int/T/E/Cultural_Co-operation/Heritage/Technical_Co-operation_and_Field_Action_Unit/AT04_171rev.pdf?L=E
2. June 2004 Report – Technical Assessment on the religious buildings/ensembles in Kosovo damaged in March 2004
www.coe.int/T/E/Cultural_Co-operation/Heritage/Technical_Co-operation_and_Field_Action_Unit/AT04_245rev.pdf?L=E
3. July 2004 Report – Technical Assessment on the religious buildings/ensembles in Kosovo damaged in March 2004
www.coe.int/T/E/Cultural_Co-operation/Heritage/Technical_Co-operation_and_Field_Action_Unit/AT04_245bis.pdf?L=E
4. Priority Intervention List – 2004: Kosovo (Joint programme Council of Europe/European Commission – IRPP/SAAH)
www.coe.int/T/E/Cultural_Co-operation/Heritage/Technical_Co-operation_and_Field_Action_Unit/IRPP_SAAH.pdf?L=E
List of monuments and sites
from the two UNESCO mission reports
(March 2003 and April 2004)
as well as from the four Council of Europe
reports (2004)
Islamic/Ottoman monuments/sites
Remarks:
- The budget in the first UNESCO report was 320.000 € but has been increased in the second report.
- Regarding the importance and complexity of the site, the preservation is an ongoing process and every intervention has to be
carefully planned and prioritized by a conservation plan.
- The environment needs to be considered for protection purposes.
- The site has been proposed for inclusion in the World Heritage List.
- The site is protected by KFOR troops.
History:
Built in the XIV c, founded by Serbian King Stephan Uros III
Decanski. The main building, a Romanesque church with
gothic details, was built between 1327 and 1335 and
covered by wall paintings in the next two decades. The rest
of the monastic buildings were organized surrounding the
church.
Significance: One of the most important sites in Kosovo.
Linked with western architectural influence represents a
unique occurrence among Balkan churches. Valuable
environment. Contains extraordinary wall paintings, icons
and furniture Included in the World Heritage List in 2004.
Condition: The site is in good condition and has not been
damaged by the military conflict.
Restoration of wall paintings (partially financed by Italian
government) is urgent and some stone decoration is
required.
MONASTERY OF DEČANI Proposed Interventions Budget
O Survey and reports on stability of the church
Deçan/Dečani
02 Deçan/Dečani municipality and condition of wall paintings.
Implementation of necessary works on the
Sources: UNESCO Mission 2003 (p. 23) basis of the conclusions of the studies 550,000 $
UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 33)
CoE Prioritized Intervention List (p. 57)
Remarks:
-The original budget in the first UNESCO and CoE reports was 525,000 €. in report, but both reports included the
restoration of a “Konak” which has been already carried out. The updated budget is included in last UNESCO report
for further interventions.
-The site, a living monastic ensemble, is protected by KFOR troops.
-Regarding the importance and complexity of the site, the preservation is an ongoing process and every intervention
has to be carefully planned and prioritized by a conservation plan.
-The environment needs to be considered for protection purposes.
History:
The church was built and decorated with frescoes in the
early XIV century by Serbian King Stephan Uros II Milutin
over older structures. The exonarthex was remodeled later
the same century. The rest of the buildings (monastery and
nunnery) are relatively recent.
Significance:. The church is one of the finest examples of
late Byzantine architecture and is preserved in its original
form intact. The frescoes were painted by the best artists of
the time; their historic and artistic value is exceptional.
Contains valuable furniture and icons.
It houses the seat of the Serbian Episcopate of Raska and
Prizren.
Condition:
Good, the building does not present visible damage, only
minor problems caused by the passing of time.
Remarks:
-The Monastery is situated in a Serbian enclave not far from Pristina.
-The site is protected by KFOR.
-Regarding the importance and complexity of the site, the preservation is an ongoing process and every intervention has to be
carefully planned and prioritized by a conservation plan.
-The site has been proposed for inclusion in the World Heritage List.
History:
Built in 1306-7 over the remains of a previous XI century
basilica, the interior was covered with wall paintings. It was
the cathedral of Prizren, converted into a mosque in the
XVIII century it was reconverted into a church in 1912.
March 2004 it was attacked and set on fire.
Significance:.
It is the only surviving serbian medieval urban cathedral and
one of the most important churches of the late byzantine
period. Wall paintings of the highest quality.
One of the most important and endangered sites in Kosovo.
Condition:
The church is severely damaged and endangered, the belfry
is very affected by fire and needs stabilizing. The wall
paintings are damaged by fire and smoke; the famous
fresco of the Virgin of Eleousa has been partially destroyed.
Extensive works urgently needed. Constructions in the
environment are affecting the site.
CHURCH OF BOGORODICA Proposed Interventions Budget
O LJEVISKA UNESCO: Preparatory: analysis and
restoration work of the structure. Protection
04 Prizren/Prizren
Prizren/Prizren municipality
of wall paintings. Second phase: total
restoration of the building and wall paintings 4,044,544 $
Sources: UNESCO Mission 2003 (p. 27) CoE: Urgent: static consolidation and wall
UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 12 ) paintings consolidation. Secure the site.
CoE Prioritized Intervention List (p. 73) Medium term further studies for restoration 55,000 €
CoE May 2004 (p. 9) of building and frescoes (no budget given)
CoE June 2004 (p. 7)
Remarks
-The great significance of the site together with the extent of the damages make this church a top priority for intervention. Its
preservation is fully endangered; some basic protection measures have to be carried out immediately. Remaining interventions need
to be planned and prioritized.
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-CoE budget only for immediate measures; UNESCO figure for long term intervention.
- Management study for establishment of an active protective buffer zone around the monument should be made within the frame of
a New General Master Plan for the protection and rehabilitation of the traditional core of the city of Prizren.
-The site has been proposed for inclusion in the World Heritage List.
History:
Built in the mid XIV century by Serbian Emperor Stephan
Dusan on the remains of an older complex. Damaged and
abandoned one century later was used as a quarry to build
Sinan Pasha mosque.
In the 1990s a new monastery was built over the remains, in
March 2004 it was burned down.
Significance: The archeological site has extraordinary
interest from the historic and archeological point of view,
including the tomb of Stephan Dusan.
The new buildings do not present historic or artistic value,
but symbolic and religious for the Serbian community.
Condition:
The archeological site was not damaged in March 2004 and
is well preserved, but the tomb of S. Dusan was damaged.
The new monastery and the workshop are burned down.
The new constructions, built on archeological remains, have
a strong impact in the site.
MONASTERY OF THE HOLY Proposed Interventions Budget
O ARCHANGELS UNESCO 2004: Archaeological research
and preservation of the site. Restoration of
05 Prizren/Prizren
Prizren/Prizren municipality
the monastic dwellings. Restoration of the
tomb. 2,000,000$
Sources: UNESCO Mission 2003 (p. 30) COE 2004: Reconstruction of the monastic
UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 26) dwellings. Storage of stones and other
CoE Prioritized Intervention List (p. 97) archaeological finds. Additional walling and 1,635,000 €
CoE May 2004 (p. 15) new generator.
CoE June 2004 (p.13)
Remarks:
- Included in the Implementation Committee works:
- The new building was controversial for religious and preservation reasons.
- In the 2nd half of 2004 a new building was erected where the workshop used to be, again over archeological remains.
- In case of reconstruction of the monastery the environmental impact on the remains should be assessed. It seems more suitable to
change its location to outside the archeological site with careful demolition of the damaged structure.
- Reports point to an eventual change of location.
- The site is protected by KFOR, a small community of monks is still living on the site.
Remarks:
-Urgent maintenance problems should be addressed immediately to prevent water ingress in the church and to secure
the site.
-The project and study for the entire monastery and environment is an adequate way to aproach the preservation of
the site, which will require additional funding in the future. The project should establish the priorities and schedule the
conservation measures to be carried out in the first phase.
History:
Built by donation of Jovan Dragoslav in 1315, it was well
constructed and decorated with wall paintings. The building
was linked with similar works in Macedonia and Greece. A
careful intervention was carried out in 1996-97.
Systematically destroyed in June July 1999.
Significance:.
It was the oldest preserved private founded mediaeval
church, and an important place of worship. The fine work
and paintings had great artistic value, which unfortunately
are now almost completely lost.
The remains have historic and archeological value.
Condition:
The church was blown up and the trees cut down. The only
parts standing are half of the south apse and the bell tower.
The remains are mostly on site and the significant building
and fresco fragments are easily recognizable among them.
CHURCH OF THE VIRGIN Proposed Interventions Budget
O Securing the site repairing the walls.
Cleaning of the site under expert
Mushitishtë/Mušutište
07 Suharekë/Suva Reka municipality supervision. Recording study and careful
storage of significant fragments of the
Sources: UNESCO Mission 2003 (p. 35) building and frescoes. Study of the remains.
Reparation of surrounding buildings and
CoE Prioritised Intervention List (p. 87) replanting of trees. 300,000 €
Remarks:
- The amount of 300,000 € is necessary for the preparatory stages of a large scale intervention which would require significantly
more funds
-The Serbian community of Musutiste has left and not yet come back.
- Considering that this church constitutes an important place of worship, successful reconstruction and restoration works would be an
important incentive for the Serbian community to return to the area;
- It is important to secure records relating to the old structure, especially the studies and records from the last intervention.
Remarks:
- The amount of 150,000 € is necessary for the preparatory stages of a large scale intervention which would require
significantly more funds:
-There are still some Serbians in the local enclave; the priest is working in the out buildings. The intervention should
help the site to be in use.
-The site is protected by KFOR
-Some of the icons are stored in Velika Hoca
-An awareness campaign for the local population by the local authorities is mentioned in the report.
History:
Originally built in the XIV century over the tomb of Stephan
Uros it was abandoned in the XVI century. After renewal it
was abandoned and ruined again in 1705. In the XIX
century it was rebuilt up to the vaults. It was covered by a
concrete roof around 1990.
Significance:.
The significance is mainly historical. The building has
disappeared. The site can be treated as an archaeological
site or as a monument of culture.
Condition:
The church was completely blown up in June 1999. The
only standing part of the building is the northern wall. There
are remains still on site, which do not seem to have been
cleared
Remarks:
- The amount of 250,000 € is necessary for the preparatory stages of a large scale intervention which would require
significantly more funds
-The possible artistic value seems to be completely lost, but from the historic and archaeological point of view the site
deserves strong intervention.
-The site is very isolated, but the area is basically inhabited by Albanians. Serbian quarters and other churches nearby
have also been completely destroyed.
History:
Built as a private endowment of an unknown Serbian
nobleman, buried in the Church in 1370. Frescoes were
added in the XIV century. Extensive reconstruction in the
XIX century. Further interventions during the XX century.
Completely destroyed in 1999.
Significance:.
The main artistic value was lost. The site is important from a
historic and archeological point of view.
Religious and symbolic value of the site for the Serbian
community, expelled from the area.
Condition:
The church is completely destroyed and the rubble has
been unprofessionally removed. The cemetery has been
systematically vandalized.
Remarks:
- The amount of 150,000 € is necessary for the preparatory stages of a large scale intervention which would require
significantly more funds
- An awareness campaign for the local population by the local authorities is mentioned in the report.
History:
Built in the XVI century a narthex was added not much
later. The narthex was painted at the beginning of the XVII
century. Later on a belfry was added to the building.
In 1999 it was destroyed with dynamite and the cemetery
was desecrated.
Significance:.
Local and historic significance. The wall paintings were not
of high quality but contained interesting icons.
Condition:
A large heap of rubble occupies the former site of the
church. The only remaining standing portion of the church
its apse.
The cemetery has been vandalized.
Remarks:
- The amount of 200,000 € is necessary for the preparatory stages of a large scale intervention which would require
significantly more funds
-The site needs to be cleaned and protected.
-The destruction is ongoing, as well as the use of the site as a dumping ground.
- An awareness campaign for the local population by the local authorities is mentioned in the report.
History:
Founded in the XIV cent. it was almost deserted in the XV c.
Renewed at the end of XVI c. with added walls, tower and
fountain. In the XIX c monastic buildings were added. The
church had three layers of frescoes from the XIV to the XVII
centuries. The monastery was destroyed in August 1999.
Significance:.
Local significance, the church was mainly important from
the historic and artistic point of view.
Historic and archaeological values of the site.
Condition:
The monastery is destroyed, the church was completely
blown up. The external wall is damaged but still standing.
Remains of some monastic buildings.
Remarks:
- The amount of 150,000 € is necessary for the preparatory stages of a large scale intervention which would require
significantly more funds
- The site needs to be cleaned and protected.
- The village of Dolac has been completely destroyed together with the monastery.
History:
The church was built in the XIV c.; after being damaged in
the XV c it was restored in 1568 and modified in the XIX c.
Frescoes from the XVI c. The rest of the buildings are later
additions of different periods.
Significance:.
The site is of regional significance, and the church remains
the focal meeting point of the Serbian community. It is the
finest surviving Serbian private religious foundation of the
early XIV c.
Condition:
Not damaged by the conflict but has some minor damage
due to lack of regular maintenance. Condensation is present
in the lower zones, and some upper. Frescoes need
conservation.
Remarks:
- The amount of 100,000 € is necessary for the restoration of the monastery and the preparatory stages of a large
scale intervention which would require significantly more funds - Protected by KFOR
- The site is in use and shelters a religious community; it is one of the few surviving monasteries in the region.
History:
Built in the 2nd half of the XIX c. on the site of an older
church foundation. Richly painted and decorated by
Macedonian artists. The iconostasis dated 1720 was
brought from San Andrea, Hungary. Not damaged in 1999;
set on fire in March 2004.
Significance: Orthodox cathedral of Prizren, the Chair of
the Diocese it is the most important church of the
episcopate, and sheltered rich treasures.
Despite the damage the site is still recognizable and has
important historic, artistic, religious and symbolic value.
Condition:
The church was burned down. Only the outer walls and the
columns remain standing. The roof, dome, vaults and belfry
collapsed and the interior was gutted. Wall paintings,
furniture, icons and other treasures are lost.
Sources: UNESCO Mission 2003 (p. 49) CoE: Immediate measures: Clearing and
UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 19) securing the site. Consolidation of walls and 200,000 €
CoE Prioritized Intervention List (p. 89) new timber roof.
CoE May 2004 (p. 23) Medium term: interior, dome and bell tower not given
CoE June 2004 (p. 27)
Remarks:
- The site is in the crowded centre of the city, protected by KFOR.
- The complex site includes other damaged buildings: the small church of St George, Runovic (cf. no O-36) and the
Episcopal residence (cf. no O-37). Opposite the road there is the small St Nicholas Church (cf. no O-35)
- The building complex and the whole site need a large-scale intervention, which has to be carefully planned and
prioritized probably in different phases. Further studies are needed.
- Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
History:
Built in the late XVI c. presumably over the remains of a XIV
c. church. Frescoes by painter Milija. The narthex was
added later. Valuable iconostasis, icons and manuscript
from around 1600. Cemetery gravestones from XVIII c.
Church completely destroyed in July 1999.
Significance:.
The church is almost lost, however the site is important from
an historic and archaeological point of view. It has symbolic
and religious significance for the Serbian community.
Valuable artefacts have disappeared.
Condition:
The church is a heap of rubble, the priest house destroyed
and the cemetery vandalized.
Remarks:
- The amount of 150,000 € is necessary for the preparatory stages of a large scale intervention which would require
significantly more funds
- The report does not mention the belfry, which is damaged but still standing. It’s restoration is necessary as well as
the cemetery clearance and tomb restoration, that together with the oak tree and the proposed works would help to
preserve the symbolic value of the site.
History:
Built for the Saxon miners employed in the nearby mines in
the XIII-XIV c the interior was covered by Byzantine
frescoes. It was used until the XVI c. Since then the building
has deteriorated progressively. There was some
preservation intervention 40 years ago.
Significance:.
The mix of Gothic style, construction techniques and
Byzantine wall paintings make this building unique.
Important archaeological value; the impressive ruins have a
big potential for attracting tourism.
Condition:
The building is a ruin with a preserved east apse,
foundations of the western part and fragments of the wall
paintings. The condition of the remains is very bad; the
walls are saturated with moisture and have moss.
Remarks:
- The amount of 100,000 € is required for covering the most urgent conservation needs as well as a comprehensive
study for a large-scale intervention:
- The possibility of use of the ruins for tourism purposes is feasible, but needs intervention and a plan to restore value
to the ruins, linking them to the locality in which they are found and the environmental and cultural assets of the area.
This includes the mines of Trepca, which are related to the origin of the site.
History:
Built between 1991-94, as a cemetery chapel. Damaged in
2001; in March 2004 was completely destroyed and the
cemetery desecrated.
Significance:.
The church is of relatively artistic and historic significance.
Its primary function was linked to the cemetery.
The site remains important, especially for the Serbian
community.
Condition:
The church has been completely destroyed and the site
leveled, only the concrete base remains. The trees were
cut and the cemetery damaged and desecrated. Outbuilding
considerably damaged.
Remarks:
- Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
- A reconstruction would allow for the performance of the cemetery’s liturgical ceremonies. The cemetery is significant
and needs to be restored to its proper condition.
History:
Built between 1994-95 on the foundations of an older
memorial church from the beginning of the XX c. Destroyed
in 1949. Even more largely destroyed in 1999 the remains
were finally razed and removed in March 2004
Significance:.
As an important religious site the church is naturally part of
Serbian cultural heritage; and with its prominent location in
the middle of the town it is of distinct cultural interest.
Condition:
Fully destroyed and debris removed; only the concrete base
remains.
Sources:
UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 37) CoE: Secure the site 9,000 €
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The construction of the building in the 90s gave rise to controversy.
-Important political implications are attached to the site.
-The current population in Gjakova is almost completely Albanian.
History:
Erected in the XIX c. on the site of an older church from the
XVI c. Undamaged in 1999 was burned later and completely
demolished in March 2004. Parish house also fully
damaged.
Significance:.
Low artistic and historic value. The church was important for
the local Serbian community and part of its collective
memory.
Condition:
Totally destroyed, the site is being use as a parking lot. The
cemetery was desecrated. Remains of the parish house in
unstable condition.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The cemetery and the church were very important for the Serbian community. Currently the local population is mainly
Albanian.
-An eventual reconstruction can be extremely controversial, but could help to the return of refugees. The decision has
important political implications.
History:
Built between the two world wars on the foundations of an
older church, it was set on fire and pulled down in 1941. In
1991 the building was restored. It was vandalized in 1999
and blown up in March 2004.
Significance:.
The church had low historic or artistic significance, was
important for the local Serbian community for religious and
symbolic reasons.
Condition:
Completely destroyed, the site is a pile of debris.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The eventual reconstruction of the site could be very controversial. The Serbian community is not present any more.
- Removal of the stones should be done in the presence of archeologists with experience on mediaeval monuments.
History:
Built in 1929. In March 2004 was attacked and set on fire.
Significance:.
Local significance.
Condition:
Partially damaged by fire and hammering. Priest’s house
devastated.
History:
Built about 1939, a fire was set alight at the main entrance
and in the alter place in March 2004
Significance:.
Local significance
Condition:
Good condition of preservation, small damage produced by
fire.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The site is not endangered, and requires minor repairs only.
History:
Built in the XX century, was destroyed and rebuilt over the
old foundations.
Vandalized and damaged by fire in 1999. In March 2004
was attacked by a Molotov cocktail.
Significance:.
The site presents local religious and symbolic significance.
Condition:
The church was damaged by an earthquake and presents
some serious structural cracks.
Remarks:
-The church presents symbolic significance, the only relevant works are those to prevent further damage
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
History:
Built at the end of the XIX century. After the war it was
partially damaged. In March 2004 the church and the parish
church were set on fire.
Significance:.
Local significance, It is one of the main churches in the city.
Presents historic and artistic values.
Condition:
Church: damaged doors, windows and floors. Emporia
completely burned, interiors blackened by smoke.
Bell tower damaged. Priest’s house burned down.
-The church is located in the south sector of the city, mainly populated by Albanians.
-Protected by KFOR troops.
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-As Mitrovica is divided by the river in two parts, it is important that the southern part be restored to ensure a balance
in the historical memory of the two communities.
History:
Erected in the XIV c. on the foundations of an early
Christian basilica (IV-VI c.). Partly reconstructed in XVI c.
Wall paintings XV-XVI c.
Significance:.
The church presents important historic and artistic values.
Wall paintings of extraordinary value and important walled
altar screen.
The site contains some archaeological remains.
Condition:
The church is in good condition, only some external damage
made in March 2004.
Wall paintings require urgent study and restoration work.
Sources:
UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 40) Repairing small damage and securing
CoE May 2004 (p. 117) archaeological remains (CoE) 3,000 €
Coe July 2004 (p. 97)
Remarks:
-The site of the church includes the newer church of St Florus and Laurus (see below, no. 26). Works to build a new
perimeter fencing, worth 24,000 €, cover both monuments, but are necessary to complete security of the site.
-The reports propose different interventions; the budgets should be added up.
-A detailed archaeological assessment of the site should be carried out.
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
History:
Built in the 20 th century near the older church of the
Presentation of the Virgin (see above, no 25)
The site is important from an archaeological point of view,
including the older church.
Significance:.
The building of the church is relatively recent. The
iconostasis screen bears some valuable icons.
Condition:
The church is in good condition; only the entrance door was
slightly damaged in March 2004.
The site requires protection.
Remarks:
-The proposed works will secure both buildings.
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
History:
A new unfinished church. It was affected by fire and stoned
in March 2004
Significance:.
No historic or artistic value found. Local significance.
Condition:
The church was never finished. Rainwater goods, doors and
windows damaged.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-Low interest building. Easy and cheap intervention required.
History:
Rebuilt in 1975 on the site of a church destroyed in 1946.
The annex building was set on fire in March 2004.
Significance:.
Limited historical or artistic value. The site has religious
significance for the local Serbian community.
Condition:
The church is undamaged but has problems of water
penetration. The guest house was affected by fire.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-Undamaged church. Minor and low-cost intervention is required to protect the guest house.
History:
Built in 1982 in the centre of the city.
It was set on fire in March 2004
Significance:.
Limited historic or artistic values. Local significance for the
Serbian community.
Condition:
Partly affected by fire and looted. Priest’s house badly
damaged by fire.
Remarks:
History:
Originally built in the XVI c. was restored in 1866 under the
patronage of the Tsarina of Russia.
Significance:.
Bears historic and artistic values.
It is of great importance for the local population.
Condition:
Roof in bad condition.
Interior damaged by fire, iconostasis burned.
Cemetery desecrated.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The site is protected by KFOR. The village is a Serbian enclave, but most of the houses are destroyed. Some of the
remaining population is living in the guesthouse on the site.
- Some of the icons are stored in Decani monastery.
History: Probably constructed shortly after 1737/1738.
Located on the terrain of the cemetery of the village. It has
not been used regularly since 1936. Detailed restoration
and conservation works were carried out 1968.
Condition:
The general condition is good but there are some
maintenance problems. Roofing is damaged (mainly by
heavy stone slabs) and needs repair. Some water
infiltration.
Remarks:
History:
Originally built in 1930, it was damaged in World War II. It
underwent several reconstructions, the final in 1971. Burned
down in 1999 and again in March 2004, when the apse was
also blown up.
Significance:.
Limited historic or artistic value. Local significance for the
Serbian community.
Condition:
Roof and rainwater goods damaged. Apse demolished,
interior damaged by fire.
Sources:
CoE May 2004 (p. 51)
CoE July 2004 (p. 19)
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites
-The site requires immediate repairs to stop further deterioration.
History:
Built in 1830 on the foundations of an older church. Rich
carved iconostasis by the Debar School was added in 1840
and wall paintings in 1902. The exonarthex is an addition of
1906. In 1990 it was refurbished and the dome was added.
Significance:.
Of regional importance, it was the main orthodox site in
Pristina. The site includes a cemetery. Rich stucco and
stone carving decoration and remarkable iconostases.
Condition:
The church is in poor condition, the roof collapsed, the
interior is devastated. The priest house and the baptistery
are burned down, and the cemetery desecrated.
Sources: UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 53) coverings, new timber roof, secure doors
CoE Prioritized Intervention List (p.91) and windows, fencing. Reconstruction of the
CoE May 2004 (p. 47) baptistery and secure the Priest’s house.
CoE June 2004 (p. 51) (120,000 €)
Remark
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-Situated in the middle of the city, mainly inhabited by Albanians, the site is not protected and is undergoing further
deterioration.
-The figure given by the CoE is only for immediate repairs, whereas UNESCO is a total estimation.
- Additional expenditure would be required to complete the interior furnishing of the church (new wooden iconostasis,
episcopal throne, ambo and emporia).
Condition:
The exterior is in good condition, but inside the building is
affected by fire, including the remains of the wall paintings.
Belfry affected by fire. External additional walls and stone
carvings also affected by fire.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-Site protected by KFOR.
-The whole Podkaljaja/Mahalla area (cf. no. V-11) surrounding the church was devastated including the smaller
church of S. Kyriake (cf. no. O-39). It used to be a traditional Serbian settlement.
-The figure given by the CoE is only for immediate repairs, whereas UNESCO is a total estimation.
History:
Built and decorated by Serbian nobleman Dragoslav Tutic in
1331-32.
Attacked in March 2004.
Significance:.
Very important historic and artistic value. Typical feudal
family church, excellent architecture and wall paintings.
Condition:
Walls attacked by hammers, lead cover partially removed,
interior affected by fire including wall paintings. Frescoes
affected by fire and threatened by humidity.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The complex site including other damaged buildings: the Episcopal church of St George (cf. no. O-14), the small
church of St George, Runovic (cf. no O-36) and the Episcopal residence (cf. no O-37) is situated across the road.
-The figure given by the CoE is only for immediate repairs, whereas UNESCO is a total estimation.
-The proposal for the demolition of side buildings made by CoE, should be in the frame of an urban intervention plan.
A proposal for the area had been made several years ago.
History:
Built in the XIV-XVI centuries. Contains a burial place and
wall paintings from the XVI century.
Attacked in March 2004
Significance:.
Important historic and artistic value from the post-byzantine
period. Valuable wall paintings with rich iconographic
programme.
Condition:
Doors and windows destroyed, tomb desecrated, interior
damaged by fire.
The walls have visible cracks prior to the attack, the wall
paintings affected but not smoke blackened
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The complex includes other damaged buildings: the Episcopal cathedral church of St George (cf. no O-14) and the
Episcopal residence (cf. no O-37). Across the road there is the small St Nicholas Church (cf. no O-35).
-The figure given by the CoE is only for immediate repairs, whereas UNESCO is a total estimation.
History:
Built in the XIX century. Initially Russian Consulate and
later residence and office of the Serbian Orthodox Bishop.
Set on fire in March 2004.
Significance:.
Limited artistic and historic value, the building is significant
as part of the site of the chair of Raska and Prizren’s
Episcopate.
Condition:
Badly damaged by fire, roof collapsed, interior gutted. Very
few walls, including perimeter walls remain.
Sources: UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 29) -CoE: Immediate: new roof and additional 30,000 €
CoE Priorty Intervention List (p. 85) window frames 320,000 €
CoE May 2004 (p. 63) -Medium term: full reconstruction 350,000 €
CoE July 2004 (p. 43) TOTAL (CoE)
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The complex includes other damaged buildings: the small church of St George, Runovic (cf.no O-36) and the
Episcopal church of St George (cf.no O-14). Across the road there is the small St Nicholas Church (cf. no O-35).
History:
Complex of four buildings, the original seminary (Uncle
Sima’s building) was built in the XIX century. The rest of the
buildings are later additions, mainly in the 1990s.
All the complex was set on fire in March 2004
Significance:.
The oldest building has historical value, and in general the
complex has religious and symbolic significance for the
Orthodox community.
Condition:
All the buildings fully damaged, especially the oldest one.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The large scale of the damage requires careful planning of interventions, giving priority to the protection and
conservation of the old building, as recommended in the reports.
-The site sheltered a small community of Serbs. Since March 2004 they have been living in KFOR premises.
History:
This smaller imitation of St Saviour Church was built in the
XIV century. Fully restored in the 1960s it contains many
original elements, wall paintings and an interesting
tombstone used as an altar.
In March 2004 it was set on fire.
Significance:.
Historic and artistic value.
Local significance.
Condition:
Interiors damaged by fire, wall paintings affected.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The whole quarter Podkjalaja/Mahalla (cf. no. V-11) surrounding the church was devastated including the church of
St. Saviour (cf.no. 0-34). It used to be a traditional Serbian settlement and is currently protected by KFOR.
History:
The oldest parts of the church date back to the XV century.
The original monastery from the XVI century. was renewed
in the XIX century. Damaged in World War II it was rebuilt in
1947-1960.In the main church, fragments of the original wall
paintings (XVI ) Remaining wall paints are from the XIX
century.
Significance:.
Outstanding historic and artistic value. Important religious
significance. Contains the tomb of S. Joanikije of Devic, a
local hermit from the XV century. Valuable wall paintings.
Condition:
The interior of the Church is damaged by fire including the
frescoes. A new timber roofing was added to the Church
since March 2004. All the monastic buildings destroyed by
fire, only external walls remain.
MONASTERY OF ST Proposed Interventions Budget
O JOANIKIJE AT DEVIČ -UNESCO: Full restoration of the site, wall
paintings furnishings, and iconostasis
40 Llaushë/Lauša
Skenderaj/Srbica municipality
(2,650,000 $)
Sources: UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 51) -CoE Immediate: Clearance, reconstruction 940,000 €
CoE Prioritized Intervention List (p. 81) of the sisters and guests’ wings, walling, 3,060,000 €
CoE May 2004 (p. 19) fencing and new generator. 4,000,000 €
CoE June 2004 (p. 19) -Later: phased reconstruction of complex
TOTAL
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The extent of this complex (about 3500 sq. m. living area) and the extensive damage need thorough planning and
prioritization of interventions, as stated in the CoE reports.
-The site is protected by KFOR. The local population is mainly Albanian.
History:
Built in the first decades of the XX century on the
foundations of an older building. Damaged and looted on
several occasions since 1999, when it was abandoned.
Significance:.
Limited historic or artistic value. Local significance for the
Serbian community.
Designed by the first Serbian woman architect Jelisveta
Nacic.
Condition:
Exterior in good condition, interior vandalized and partially
damaged by fire. Bell tower upper part destroyed by fire.
Paintings vandalized
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-Practical measures can prevent further deterioration.
-The conservation of the wall paintings does not seem to be the top priority, as stated by UNESCO. The quality is very
poor, priority should be given to the protection of the site.
History:
Built in 1933 in a central position of the town.
Came under attack in March 2004
Significance:.
Great religious and symbolic significance.
Contains valuable decoration and artefacts.
Condition:
Attacks were halted by KFOR, damage only near the
entrances.
The priest’s house is severely damaged.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The site is protected by KFOR.
History:
Built in 1930 over old foundations of a destroyed building.
Vandalized and damaged in 1999 and again in March 2004.
Significance:.
Local significance for the Serbian community.
Interesting elements and constructive techniques.
Condition:
Severely damaged by fire, structural collapse. Cemetery
desecrated.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The site is protected by KFOR.
History:
Modern church built in the XX century attacked in 1999 and
again in March 2004.
Significance:.
Limited historic and artistic value.
Local religious and symbolic significance of the site, which
contains a Serbian cemetery.
Condition:
Interior affected by fire, roof covering partially removed.
Guesthouse extensively affected by fire. Large proportion of
tombstones damaged
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-Demolition of the guesthouse is pointed out in the report.
-Consideration should be given to carry out the whole intervention at once, due to the small size of the buildings.
-The site is protected by KFOR troops.
History:
No historic data available. The cemetery is an older
settlement; the chapel is a recent construction of poor
quality.
Significance:.
The cemetery has local significance for the Serbian
community.
Condition:
Church: damaged roof and internally affected by fire.
Guesthouse fully damaged by fire.
Cemetery: large proportion of headstones damaged.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites. The budget for the immediate
protection of the site is already allocated by the PISG.
History:
Recent church built in the XX century. Was attacked in
March 2004.
Significance:.
The site has local significance for the Serbian community.
Condition:
Interior damaged by fire. Cemetery desecrated.
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-Consideration should be given to carry out the whole intervention at once, due to the small size of the building.
-The site is protected by KFOR.
History:
Attacked in March 2004.
Significance:.
Limited historic and artistic value, the church has religious
and symbolic significance for the local Serbian community.
The iconostasis and the entrance door are valuable
Condition:
The church is in good condition, small cracks produced by
an earthquake.
Priest’s house damaged by bullets.
Sources:
CoE May 2004 (p. 109)
CoE July 2004 (p. 91)
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
-The site is in perfect condition and in use. It is inhabited and maintenance properly carried out.
History:
Erected in 1834 on the remains of an earlier church from the
XVI-XVII century. Vandalized in 1999 it was fully damaged
in March 2004.
Significance:.
Bears historic and artistic values. Local religious and
symbolic significance.
Rich wall paintings partly conserved.
Condition:
Roof and interior fully affected by fire. There are some
structural cracks. Cemetery desecrated.
The earlier church is enclosed by a newer exonarthex.
Remarks:
Condition:
Recently restored but drainage system needs to be
installed.
Remarks:
-Building was restored in 2003.
-Proposed intervention to be carried out: drainage around the building and restoration of graveyard
Significance:
Historic and artistic value. Religious and symbolic
significance. Situated in the old market quarter it is part of a
unique ensemble.
Remarks:
-The mosque is under restoration (2005) with U.S. and Swedish funds concentrating on restoration of minaret,
external stone conservation works, drainage. Therefore the above sum of 285,000€ is to be revised accordingly.
-Proposed further interventions: restoration of gravestones, conservation of wall paintings approx. cost 175,000 €.
-The PISG also suggests to reconstruct and refurbish the XVII century library which was part of the ensemble.
Estimated cost approx: 1,000,000€.
History: Probably built by Murat’s son, Sultan Bayazit I at
the end of XIV century near the place of his demise.
Contains a cenotaph of the sultan. Was rebuilt and restored
several times: in the XVI century in 1859, in 1911; finally in
1990 by the Turkish Ministry of Culture. The site contains
later cenotaphs of Rif’a Pasha (1859) and Mehmet Pasha
(1903)
Significance:.
The monument bears artistic value. It has great historic
significance as part of the site of the famous battle of
Kosovo Polje in 1389.
Condition:
The building is in good condition in general.
There is water infiltration through the roof. Stone chemical
and physical weathering and salt efflorescence in many
areas.
SULTAN MURAT I Proposed Interventions Budget
I MAUSOLEUM (TÜRBE) Documentation, structural assessment,
diagnosis, restoration and conservation
03 Mazgit
Obiliq/Obilić municipality
including the following works.
-Desalination, cleaning and consolidation of
Sources: UNESCO Mission 2003 (p. 98 ) stones; repair and replacement of stones.
Renewal of rotted floorboards. Intervention
in the garden. New rainwater collector
around the building.
217,000 €
Remarks:
-The whole plain known as Gazimestan is the historic site of the famous battle of Kosovo Polje. There are other
monuments in the site such as the Memorial Complex (cf. no. V-09) about 1 km. away.
History:
Built in the XVIII century in oriental style. At the end of XIX
century an annex was added to the building
Significance:
Artistic, scientific and historic values from the Ottoman
period and oriental architecture. Regional importance. The
site has been used as an archaeological and ethnological
museum over the past 30 years.
Condition:
Very bad condition. The roof is damaged, water infiltrations
from roof and soil. Interior in bad condition, several cracks in
the walls.
Remarks:
-The given budget is a rough preliminary evaluation. A further study needs to be carried out.
- Immediate measures for the protection of the site should be taken to prevent further deterioration.
-The use of the regional museum seems adequate for the building. Situated in the core of Mitrovica, it will contribute to
the development of cultural tourism.
History: The name of the mosque is attributed to its
construction with red bricks. According to an inscription
above the entrance it was built by Sinān Aghā in 1173 H. /
1759-1760 A.D. and later renovated by Qahraman Pasha in
1307 H./ 1889-1890 A.D. Largely destroyed in 1999.
Significance:
Historic and artistic value. Religious and symbolic
significance.
Remarks:
-Restored in 2004 by Arab funds; foundations, walls, roofing, plastering, (without paintings), wooden mezzanine.
-The building should be reassessed to identify preservation needs.
Significance:
Historic and artistic value. Religious and symbolic
significance.
Remarks:
-Restoration works scheduled to commence in 2005 with Italian funds.
History: Probably built in the second half of the 15th century
by Sultan Mehmet al-Fatih and subsequently restored and
reconstructed. Burnt in 1999. Recently renovated with
Italian funds.
The minaret probably belongs to an early mosque as the
level is about 1 m lower than the level of the mosque’s
flooring. Recent excavations showed an older flooring.
Significance:
Historic and artistic value. Religious and symbolic
significance.
Condition:
Good condition due to the recent reconstruction
Remarks:
-The building was reconstructed in 2002 (Italian funds), the building now has problems with dampness in the wall
stones.
History:
Built around 1470. Destroyed by fire in 1999.
Significance:.
It is one of the oldest monuments in Pristina. Historical
value and important significance together with the old town.
Condition:
Badly damaged by fire, the weather and the cement added
in the joints have contributed to deterioration. Dampness in
walls by infiltration and capillar action.
Remarks:
- Both reports highlight the integration of any intervention with urban regeneration of the center of Pristina.
History:
Constructed by Sultan Mehmet II al Fatih around 1460 in
the old core of Pristina. Restored in 1682-3, XVIII and XIX
century. Painted decorations from XVIII century. The upper
part of the minaret fell down during an earthquake and was
rebuilt in 1955.
Significance:.
One of the oldest monuments in Pristina, testimony of the
sacral architecture of the Ottoman period. Historic and
artistic value. Religious significance. The building is in use.
Condition:
Poor. Dampness from the roof and the soil. Some areas of
stone work are damaged. Cracks in construction elements.
Doors and windows need to be repaired.
-Possible integration of any intervention with urban regeneration of the center of Pristina and programmes of cultural
tourism development.
History:
Built in the XV century next to the Mehmet II al Fatih
Mosque. The interior was decorated with murals. The baths
were transformed over the centuries. It has been out of use
for some time, except for the south zone, completely
renewed and occupied by shops.
Significance:.
Regional significance. One of the rare examples of the
Ottoman bath typology in Kosovo. Historic, artistic and
symbolic value. The urban area is a very significant part of
the city.
Remarks:
-The building is undergoing serious and fast deterioration. An urgent protective intervention has to be carried out
immediately.
-The urban site deserves an integrated conservation plan, together with the Mosque, the small Hammam, the Clock
Tower, the building of the Academy of Science and Arts and the rest of the urban environment.
History:
According to the inscription inside the mosque, the building
was founded by Yashar Mehmet Pasha in 1834. Other
sources suggest the XVI century. The original portico was
later replaced by a smaller one.
Significance:.
Historic and artistic value. Religious and symbolic
significance.
The building is still in use on a daily basis.
Condition:
Dampness from damaged lead cover and capillary action.
Cracks, rusted iron bars.
Degradation of the environment is ongoing.
Remarks:
- Possible integration of any intervention with urban rehabilitation of the historical centre of Pristina and programmes
of cultural tourism development.
Condition:
Water penetration through the roof has caused plaster
detachment and loss of paintings. Stone deterioration.
Remarks:
-The urban site deserves an integrated conservation plan, together with the rest of the urban environment.
History:
Founded by Gazi Mehmet Pasha in the second half of the
XVI century together with the Bayrakli Mosque, high school
and primary school, library and mausoleum. Restored in
1834. Currently used for temporary exhibitions.
Significance:.
High value, as one of the most important Hammams in the
Balkans, combines local and oriental influences.
Condition:
Poor due to water penetration through the roof. Floor, walls
and cupolas partly damaged.
CoE Prioritised Intervention List (p. 19) CoE: full restoration 115,000 €
-The urban site deserves an integrated conservation plan, together with the rest of the urban environment.
History:
Built in the Ottoman period, has not been in use for over 25
years.
Significance:.
One of the oldest Ottoman public baths
Condition:
The building is not dilapidated but due to lack of
maintenance roof tiles are missing, residual water passing
along the walls, plaster and joint mortars detached in some
places and floors in bad condition.
Remarks:
Remarks:
Condition:
Ruinous state, walls almost collapsed. Bad condition of the
archeological finds, except the foundation of the Good
Friday cathedral, discovered and preserved in 2003.
Remarks:
History:
This village became a centre for wine growing and trade in
the XII century. Landowners built their dwellings in the
village. Many churches were built since the XIV century,
such as St Nicholas, St John and St Stephen. The village
still retains its vernacular appearance typical of the Serbian
population.
Significance:.
The integration of buildings, landscape and vineyards is
unique to Kosovo. The ensemble should be preserved along
with the churches.
Condition:
Many houses have been abandoned as a result of armed
conflict. Many buildings are dilapidated. The site needs
further assessment.
Remarks:
-The interventions have to be accompanied with measures to retain the current population and facilitate the return of
displaced persons.
-All the interventions have to be carefully planned and prioritized, due to the complexity of the preservation of the site.
History:
Inhabited since the VIII century B.C., the Roman city of
Ulpiana was built on the site and first mentioned in the
second century A.D. when it became a city. After an
earthquake in 518 A.D. Justinian reconstructed the city
changing its name to Justiniana Secunda. Subsequently it
became an important episcopal seat.
Significance:
It is the most important archaeological site in Kosovo, with
major finds to date.
Condition:
In general very poor condition of the remains discovered.
Site not protected and neglected.
Remarks:
- Ulpiana is considered as one of the most important archaeological sites of the Balkans, which may be far from being
fully and systematically excavated.
- Excavations on this site and other archaeological sites in Kosovo need significant investments. Existing and future
archaeological finds need to be preserved and exhibited in the museums of Kosovo. The conditions of the museums
in Kosovo need to be improved. The PISG recommends 1,000,000€ for this purpose.
Remarks:
The complex was restored in 2002-03 with the assistance of EAR. It is now an Ethnographic museum (belonging to
Kosovo Museum).
History:
The atelier was the private house of the famous Kosovo-
Albanian sculptor Agim Cavdarbasha. The site is made up
of a house-atelier, an open gallery and a museum. In March
2004 it was attacked and set on fire.
Significance:.
Linked to the life and works of a renowned artist, it is one of
the few private museums in Kosovo. The site is unique and
the collection has great artistic value.
Condition:
House destroyed by fire. Some walls remain in unstable
condition. About 80-100 artefacts have been destroyed.
The remaining objects are spread out all over the site and
subject to deterioration and possible looting.
ATELIER, GALLERY, MUSE- Proposed Interventions Budget
V UM AGIM CAVDARBASHA UNESCO: Surveillance of the site,
reconstruction of the museum and
07 Caglavica/Čaglavica
Prishtinë/Priština municipality
protection of the exhibits (75,000 $)
CoE Immediate: temporary roofing in the
Sources: yard to protect pieces. Additional fencing. 15,000 €
UNESCO Mission 2004 (p. 55) Later: full reconstruction of the building.
CoE May 2004 (p. 107) Replicas of lost artefacts and reconstruction
CoE July 2004 (p. 87) of the museum exhibition 85,000 €
TOTAL 100,000 €
Remarks:
-Included in the Implementation Committee for the Reconstruction of Religious Sites.
History:
Built in 1927 as a hotel, the building has been used as a
post office until recently.
Significance:.
It is one of the few examples of middle-European
architecture in Kosovo. Regional importance.
Significant urban position.
Condition:
Poor - caused by water penetration and lack of
maintenance.
Building is not in use.
Remarks:
-Technical assessment carried out by ACM in July 2000 on main restoration works.
-Feasibility study carried out by F Riedl in May 2003 for the full rehabilitation of the building.
History:
Built in 1953 to commemorate the famous battle of Kosovo-
Polje of 1389,an epic event in Serbian history.
Significance:.
The memorial tower has a symbolic value, and the battle
field site has great historical value.
Condition:
Inscriptions lost and the bottom of the staircase was blown
up.
Remarks:
-The monument is part of the historic site of the battle of Kosovo-Polje. There are other monuments on the site: the
mausoleum of Murat (cf. no. I-03) and Bajraktarevo Turbe.
-The recommendations for the site are very interesting, but the estimate is restricted to the monument only.
History:
Illyrian and Neolithic remains. First mentioned in the VI
century B.C. and later in the XI century A.D. Continuously
used and fortificated. During the mediaeval period,
refortified and important buildings added. In 1912 the citadel
and its buildings were blown up and abandoned.
Significance:.
Of important historic and archeological value. The site has
great significance. It is the symbol of the city of Prizren.
Condition:
The site is neglected and very deteriorated.
Remarks:
- Estimated rehabilitation costs according to COE Preliminary Technical Assessment 2005: 800,000€
- The old town of Prizren adjoining this Fortress is very significant historically and needs to be preserved and
rehabilitated through a proper urban heritage plan. The PISG recommends an additional 300,000 € for this purpose.
History:
Located on a hill between the river and the fortress, this
Serbian picturesque quarter was a unique ensemble. It was
set on fire and largely destroyed in March 2004.
Significance:.
Great historical significance.
Urban value seriously hampered by the destruction.
Very important site for the identity of Serbian population in
Prizren
Condition:
Not in use after its destruction in March 2004.
Houses extensively damaged by fire.
Remarks:
-The process for the reconstruction of the area will be long and complicated. It needs good planning and has to be
coordinated with the offices concerned with the return of displaced persons, since the population is very important to
revitalize the urban areas. This process has started recently.
-The area is under control of KFOR troops.
History:
The first five arches were probably built in early mediaeval
Byzantine time, and the remaining four arches added later.
The river changed its course and now the bridge stands on
dry ground.
Significance:.
It is the oldest stone bridge preserved in Kosovo.
Regional significance as a remain of the Byzantine and
Ottoman era. Extraordinary historic value.
Condition:
Neglected and dilapidated, the bridge is half buried. Many
stones have been removed.
Remarks:
Condition:
Vey poor. Severe deterioration of the perimeter walls and
archeological remains. Lack of maintenance.
Zvecan/Zvečan
13 Zveçan/Zvečan municipality
PISG estimates for aerial survey, diagnostic
Sources: study, study for archaeological excavation
and conservation, design proposal for re-
CoE Prioritised Intervention List (p. 49) use and conservation works 200,000€
Remarks:
The budget for interventions will be drawn up in a CoE Preliminary Technical Assessment (PTA)
Francisco Montanes
Alex Mills
Ms Susanne Wik