Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Saep 12
Saep 12
Note: This version of SAEP-12 is applicable only to projects using the new Capital Management
System. All other projects will use the previous version of the procedure dated 19 June 2011.
Contents
1 Scope ..................................................................................... 2
2 References ............................................................................. 5
3 Instructions ............................................................................. 6
4 Responsibilities .................................................................... 21
5 Conflicts and Deviations ....................................................... 23
E x h i b i t s ................................................................................... 24
Exhibit A - Table of Contents ...................................................... 24
Exhibit B.1 - Approval Sheet for Initial and Abbreviated PEPs .... 25
Exhibit B.2 - Approval Sheet for Full PEP ................................... 26
Exhibit B.3 - Approval Sheet for Full PEP ................................... 27
Exhibit B.4 - Approval Sheet for Full PEP ................................... 28
Exhibit C - Revision Control ........................................................ 29
Exhibit D - Contracting Plan Matrix ............................................. 30
Exhibit E - Comparison of Various Contracting Alternatives ....... 31
Exhibit F - Project Milestone Schedule ........................................ 32
Exhibit G.1 - Integrated Project Team “IPT”
(Typical - Business Case “FEL 1” Phase) ............... 33
Exhibit G.2 - Integrated Project Team “IPT”
(Typical - Study and DBSP “FEL 2” Phases) .......... 33
Exhibit G.3 - Integrated Project Team “IPT”
(Typical - Project Proposal Phase “FEL 3”) ............. 34
Exhibit G.4 - Integrated Project Team “IPT” (Typical -
Detailed Design and Procurement Phases) ............ 34
Exhibit G.5 - Integrated Project Team “IPT”
(Typical - Construction Phase) ................................ 35
Exhibit H - Project Responsibility Matrix ...................................... 36
Exhibit I - Front End Loading (FEL) & Project Characterization .. 37
Exhibit J - FEL Deliverables (for Projects Value < $20MM)......... 38
Document History........................................................................ 41
1 Scope
1.1 Definition
The Project Execution Plan (PEP) is a strategic planning document that defines
objectives, plans, requirements, and related information necessary for optimum project
execution. It is a master reference guide that promotes common understanding and
alignment of all project participants. The PEP is prepared by the Project Leader (FPD)
during the Business Case (FEL 1) and is updated by future Project Manager/Sr. Project
Engineer during DBSP phase (FEL 2) and by the Project Manager during Project
Proposal phase (FEL 3) and onward with input from the Proponent and other Saudi
Aramco organizations that have key roles in the project's planning and execution.
For all versions of the PEP, the Project Sponsor concurs with the recommendations
while approval rests with the Construction Agency.
1.2 Purpose
The PEP serves as a communication and coordination tool that formally establishes the
Project Leader’s/Manager's front-end project planning, with emphasis on identifying
issues critical to project success and defining strategies to address these issues. It is an
agreement endorsed by the Facilities Planning Department (FPD), Saudi Aramco
Project Management Team (SAPMT), Proponent, and Management defining the
execution strategy of the project. The PEP provides strategic guidance in developing
more detailed tactical planning and execution tools as the project progresses. In one
comprehensive document, the PEP relates the approved project scope with contracting
and materials plans, cost information, summary schedules, value improving practices
implementation (including Project Risk Management), departmental responsibilities,
and project staffing requirements.
The Project Execution Plan is completed in three phases: the Initial PEP, the
Abbreviated (Updated) PEP, and the Full (Final) PEP.
Initial PEP is mandatory for Types A and B projects
Abbreviated PEP is mandatory for Types A, B, and C projects
Full PEP is mandatory for:
o Types A, B, and C projects
- over $50MM
- for ≤ $50MM, as recommended by the responsible Construction Agency’s
Department Manager
o Type C1 projects
Exception:
PEPs are waived for Master Appropriation projects.
For a program that consists of several BIs, a single combined PEP may be prepared
provided it addresses matters related to all BIs included in the program.
The PEP shall be issued in accordance with the timing outlined below, which is
designed to support the PEP's purpose of serving as a strategic planning tool:
To be developed and issued for approval by the Project Leader during the
Business Case phase. The Initial PEP is intended to provide a framework for
subsequent planning and shall address the following items using the best
information currently available:
Project Summary (that covers aspects of the Project Charter)
Contracting Strategy
Master Schedule
Project Organization and Interfaces
Value Improving Practices (VIP) Plan (including Project Risk Management)
As the project progresses through follow-on phases, the Initial PEP is updated to
become the Abbreviated PEP.
The PEP shall be updated as the need arises prior to implementing major scope
changes, significant changes in the Contracting Plan, and at other times as deemed
necessary by the PEP approval authority. SAPMT may issue a completely revised
document or an addendum covering the changed section(s) only.
2 References
3 Instructions
Provide a brief synopsis of the objectives, scope, and current progress status of the
project. Incorporate into the Project Summary:
Define where the project currently stands in the project life cycle, in order to
establish the information basis on which the PEP is being prepared.
Briefly identify the major ongoing activities and provide current percentage of
completion of the Business Case, Design Basis Scoping Paper, Project Proposal,
detailed engineering, procurement, and construction, as applicable.
PEP should state location of project and indicate whether offshore or onshore and
reference any issues regarding site selection (Land Use Permit or other issues).
In addition to hot tap/stopple operations and tie-ins, the PEP should also identify
shutdown requirements and if it is planned during Plant T&I.
PEP should identify other related projects that may impact the project positively
or negatively.
Summarize the plan to prepare the Deliverable Waiver Request (DWR) and
obtain its approval. The DWR is concluded at completion of Business Case,
Study, DBSP and Finalize FEL phases.
The Front End Loading Manual provides recommended deliverables for Types A,
B, C, and C1 projects over $ 20MM. For Projects less than or equal to $20MM,
the recommended deliverables list is provided as Exhibit-J. However, for each
individual project, the Project Leader/Manager and the IPT will determine the
specific list of deliverables for their project.
The DWR is required for projects Types A, B, C, and C1 except for the DWR in
the Study Phase, which is not applicable to Types C or C1 projects.
Note: The DWR is a list of deliverables proposed by the integrated project team (IPT)
in order to waive those deliverables in the next FEL Phase that they deem
unnecessary or inapplicable to the proposed project or the information that is
generally found in these deliverables can be located/obtained from other
sources without additional work. It also, provides the rationale for each
deliverable included in the deliverable waiver request. For more details on the
DWR process, refer to Value Assurance Manual.
3.3 Contracting
The contract development process is often intricate and interrelated and once actions
based on a particular strategy are initiated, it may not be practical or possible to modify
the strategy. An overall contracting strategy, which addresses all aspects of the work,
must be developed and presented by the contract proponent (Construction Agency) to
management at an early stage of every project.
For the updated and final versions of the Contracting Strategy, input comes from
the Senior Project Engineer, Contracting Coordinator, and the FPD representative.
This Contracting Strategy shall be updated by the contract proponent
(Construction Agency) to reflect any major changes (particularly related to OOK
contracts, non-lump sum contracts, and non-competitive awards). For other
The Contracting Strategy shall summarize the plans for developing and procuring
the necessary contracts for the project's major contracting phases (i.e., Project
Proposal, Detailed Design, Procurement and Construction). Information shall be
categorized by the major contracting phases mentioned and include the following:
a) Type of Contract (Lump Sum Turnkey, Lump Sum, Lump Sum Procure/Build,
Reimbursable Cost, Unit Rate, etc.) and the reasons for selection.
b) Procurement Method (Competitive Bid, Sole Source, etc.) and reasons for
selection and whether an existing General Bid Slate/Screening List will be
used.
c) Appropriate Project and Contracting Milestones, for example:
- Prepare and Issue Bid Packages
- Expenditure Request Approval (ERA)
- Contract Award
- Mechanical Completion
- On Stream
The Contacting Strategy shall include an exhibit illustrating the contracting plan
in matrix form (See Exhibit D).
A Contracting Plan is required for each contract action (or related contract
actions) unless the requirement has been waived in writing by the Contracting
Representative. The Contracting Plan is the joint responsibility of the Contracting
Department and the contract proponent (Construction Agency). After approval by
the Contract Signatory, the Contracting Plan shall be incorporated into the Project
Execution Plan. For more detailed instructions, refer to the Saudi Aramco Supply
Chain Management Manuals, Volume-I, Section 7.3.
Prior to carrying out a detailed analysis as part of the Contract Plan, potential
contracting alternatives in the form of a summary level schedule comparison
shall be prepared (See Exhibit E).
The Materials Procurement Strategy describes the potential strategies for the different
procurement options available. The Materials Procurement Plan addresses project
material requirements, their procurement and movement and it should define the proposed
procurement and traffic responsibilities of Saudi Aramco and the Contractor(s).
The procurement strategy is to be developed near the end of the DBSP (after all
major equipment is identified) and feeds the Materials Procurement Plan during
Project Proposal and is done with input from the SAPMT representative, Materials
Procurement Coordinator, Contracting Coordinator, and Inspection Coordinator.
The recommendations are agreed upon by the relevant departments of the Materials
Supply organization (thru Materials Procurement Coordinator) and decisions are
made by the Construction Agency. The Materials Procurement Strategy:
Provides important project background information that highlights the main
procurement requirements for the project.
Highlights those items (i.e., long lead and novated items) that require special
early attention from a procurement perspective in order to avoid delays in
project execution.
Details the various strategies that could be used to source equipment and
materials, including internal sourcing (using existing inventory), external
sourcing by Saudi Aramco, and external sourcing via a contractor.
Provides a recommended strategy to utilize for procurement of materials (to
be used and detailed further in the Materials Procurement Plan in the Project
Proposal phase).
3.4.1.1 Critical and Long Lead-time Material and Equipment
This plan designates responsibilities between Saudi Aramco and Contractors for
cost effective supply of materials and equipment to meet project schedules.
pre-commissioning forms. The procedures should cover all disciplines (for example
buildings, electrical systems, instrumentation, non-hydrocarbon mechanical systems, etc.)
Identification of the Mechanical Completion Packages, which describe the limit and
scope of the system. This is to include drawings that indicate the system boundaries
and isolation locations.
Vendor Representative Requirements
Master of the Punch List/ Exception Item List Database
Pre-commissioning Status Tracking System
Systems Turnover Sequence - Provides a conceptual plan of the breakdown of the
facility into systems and the sequence in which these systems will be checked out
and turned over to the Proponent. Also, address specific plans to implement Partial
Mechanical Completion, if applicable.
For reference and details, please refer to GI-0002.710 and SAEP-367.
The Commissioning and Start-up Plan is a planning document that defines the
objectives, plans, requirements, and related activities and information necessary for a
successful start-up. It is a master reference guide that promotes common understanding
and alignment of all project participants.
Saudi Aramco GI-0002.710, provides the framework for start-up planning. The Planning
for Start-up Best Practice is a useful reference and provides tools designed to assist in
developing and implementing an early start-up plan (see SAEP-367).
The Commissioning and Start-up Plan describes the roles and responsibilities of key
persons and organizations, as well as the timing of commissioning and start-up planning
and execution activities. The start-up plan shall address the following issues:
The development of the Commissioning and Start-up Plan (as an integral part of
the Operational Readiness Plan “ORP”) is the responsibility of the Senior
Operations Representative with input from the Project Manager, Safety and
Industrial Security (S&IS), Inspection, etc. It also relies upon information from
the Pre-commissioning and Mechanical Completion plan, developed in the DBSP
phase. The Project Manager is to provide oversight to ensure that commissioning
and start-up planning is performed as an activity that is planned and tracked.
Note: The Operational Readiness Plan (ORP) is a document that highlights and
describes activities and resources aiming to ensure the optimization of
Operations and Maintenance activities over the facility lifetime (starting after
Handover). The ORP also defines how the project will transition into an
operating facility and will describe what “operational-type” steps must be taken
along the project planning and execution path to have a flawless start-up and
initial operations.
The Sr. Operations Representative (with input from the Project Manager) shall be
assigned responsibility for managing the planning of commissioning and start-up,
specifying when these assignments will be made and what their start-up planning
responsibilities will entail. He shall identify other key contributors to start-up
planning and execution, including Inspection, Loss Prevention, contractors,
vendors, and others as required, and define their roles and responsibilities.
He shall also provide estimated timing and duration of start-up planning,
pre-commissioning, mechanical completion, and commissioning activities,
including operations and maintenance training required prior to start-up.
Provide a conceptual plan of the breakdown of the facility into systems and the
sequence in which these systems will be completed and taken over from the
SAPMT.
Describe the strategies to be utilized to ensure effective cost control and accurate
cost reporting throughout the project life from Preliminary Engineering Funds
approval through project closeout. Address the subjects of work breakdown
structure, cost contingency management, cost status reporting systems, and
expenditure forecast preparation. Identify any unique project characteristics that
may require deviations from standard Saudi Aramco cost control procedures,
and provide plans for handling such cases.
In the Abbreviated PEP, include the IPT organization chart for the Study and
DBSP phases and proposed Integrated Staffing Assignment for the Project
Proposal phase.
In an updated Abbreviated PEP or Full PEP (if applicable), include the IPT
organization chart for the Project Proposal and proposed Integrated Staffing
Assignment for the execution phases.
Note: Integrated Staffing Assignment is a document that defines the necessary
staffing to perform the activities in the following phase.
This ensures that there is no lack of resources to prepare the deliverables for
the next gate, and ensures continuity.
For typical organization charts for each major phase of the project, see Exhibit G1
to G5. For more details, refer to Integrated Project Team Manual.
Describe how the SAPMT will provide effective and efficient communications
among the SAPMT, proponent, support groups, and contractors during all
phases of the project.
Describe how the SAPMT will provide close coordination and effective
interface with other BIs, SAPMTs, or Proponents, whose work will have direct
impact on the Project's activities.
This plan identifies and details the interfaces among existing and new facilities
and among contractors. It provides oversight of the interactions and information
flow between the major contractors. The main components of the document
include the following:
1) Project information - Provides a summary of important project background
information including actions that will be taken about upgrade, renovation
or addition to existing facilities, interfaces between new and existing
facilities, etc.
2) Contractor Scopes of Work and Interfaces - Defines the division of work
between the different contracts associated with the project.
3) Interface Roles and Responsibilities - States the roles and responsibilities
between contractors for interface systems. Also, identifies other
government/public and private organizations (such as SEC, SSSP, airport
authorities, etc.) and their roles and responsibilities.
4) Master Interface Register - Lists the interface points (IPs) and is the
primary system used to control engineering, and data associated with
physical interfaces. Additionally, it identifies the deliverables associated
with construction that depend on others (internal/external).
5) Interface Management Process - Details the Interdependency Schedule (given
to contractors to be aware of future requirements of other contractors), and the
Interface Execution Plan (describes how contractor will implement the
interface scope of work). This section also includes details on the
Interface Query Process, Interface Meetings, and Interface Agreements.
6) Tools to be used for interface management, SAPMT and Contractor
training in the use of such tools, number of licenses, etc.
The Project Manager will initially develop the Interface Management Plan upon
completion of DBSP and will issue its final version upon completion of Project
Proposal package.
Summarize the plan for implementing Value Improving Practices (including Project
Risk Management) and Benchmarking as required per SAEP-367 and SAEP-26,
Contact PMOD/PEOD’s Value Practices Unit (VPU) for assistance with this section, if
required.
1) Value Engineering
2) Project Risk Management
3) Best Practices Implementation (include Project Management's currently-identified
or other industry best practices)
4) Benchmarking
3.11 Project Safety
Summarize the plan for implementing project safety studies. The objective in
performing these studies is to identify, assess and evaluate (analyze and rank) major
hazards and risks to personnel, and other assets. Additional goals are to develop
measures to reduce and control risks, improve process safety, protect personnel, the
Company’s reputation, assets, and business, and to minimize operability problems.
The first of the HAZOP studies shall be conducted during the Project
Proposal stage (see SAEP-14) and the report shall be incorporated
into the Project Proposal. During the detailed design, HAZOP
studies shall be performed, when the facility design is firm and no
The Project Leader/Manager shall notify LPD, EPD, P&CSD, and all
other concerned parties at least six weeks in advance of any PreHA
and HAZOP study so that qualified personnel can be assigned
participate in the studies. Supporting documentation (PFDs, P&IDs,
operating procedures, etc.) can be arranged at this time.
Describe the safety program for the project. The program should describe the
safety objectives for the project and how the program will be managed to ensure
these objectives are met. Address the issues of accident prevention and contractor
safety that shall also include job site safety. For details, please refer to both Saudi
Aramco- Safety Management System and Construction Safety Manual.
Describe the plan for performing the Environmental Assessment and mitigation of
environmental impacts as required by SAEP-13.
Summarize the plan for preparing and submitting the Project Closeout Reports in accordance
with SAEP-329. The Project Leader/Manager is to ensure that preparation and submission
of the Project Closeout Reports is included as an activity that is planned and tracked.
Address what actions will be taken to promote and support the hiring and training of
Saudi Arab personnel by contractors working on the project.
Address what actions will be taken with regards to upgrade renovation or addition to
existing facilities in the following areas:
Design and site investigation work required during the project proposal development
and detail design phases to determine as-built condition of existing facilities.
Risk assessment for items that may impact the project cost estimate.
3.17 Areas of Concern
Address project concerns where corresponding plans of action or solutions have not
been completely defined. Concerns for project delivery should be addressed by Project
Risk Management, including any unusual efforts or procedures required for successful
project completion. Areas of Concern related to external interfaces and engineering or
operational issues that may affect the resulting capability provided by the project should
also be highlighted here.
Highlight factors that may influence the project design (e.g., operations
manning philosophy, operating reliability, capital versus operating costs,
material sourcing premiums, labor premiums and location constraints, etc.).
Provide action plans to address any concerns.
3.17.2 Construction
Highlight factors that can influence the project construction (e.g., site location,
security, other projects, etc.). Provide action plans to address any concerns.
Summarize other Saudi Aramco activities that will be affected by the project
(e.g., maintaining minimum production rates at existing facilities).
Identify other known factors that may impact efficient execution of the project
and provide plans that address the concerns (e.g., SAPMT and others staffing
restraints).
4 Responsibilities
4.1 Preparation
Preparation of the Initial and Abbreviated PEP are the responsibility of the Project
Leader and future Project Manager/Sr. Project Engineer, respectively; coordination of
reviews, and obtaining approval signatures are the responsibility of the Project Leader.
For the Full PEP, preparation, coordination of reviews, and obtaining approval
signatures are the responsibility of the Project Manager.
4.2 Approvals
The Initial PEP (for Types A & B projects) and the Abbreviated PEP (for Types A,
B, & C projects) that are prepared prior to release of Preliminary Engineering
funds (and all subsequent revisions) require concurrence of the Project Sponsor
and approval of the Construction Agency Department Manager (see approval
sheet, Exhibit B.1).
The Project Manager shall submit a copy of the Abbreviated PEP to Project
Management Office Department (PMOD)/Project Execution Metrics Division
(PEMD) to verify the milestones.
Copies of the latest version of the Initial and Abbreviated PEPs shall also be
included in the Project Closeout Report to be submitted at DBSP phase
completion (see SAEP-329).
4.2.2.1 For Types A, B, and C projects with a value over $100MM the original
Full PEP requires approval by the Executive Director/Vice President of
the Construction Agency after concurrence by the Project Sponsor and
Proponent Admin Area Head (see approval sheet, Exhibit B.2).
A revised Full PEP only requires approval by the Construction Agency Department
Manager after concurrence by the Proponent Department Manager. A copy of the
revised Full PEP shall be forwarded to the signatories of the original Full PEP.
PMOD shall review PPU/MPU comments on the status of Full PEP submittals at
30% preliminary engineering as an integral part of BISR reviews. Copies of the
latest version of the Full PEP shall be included in the progressive Project
Closeout Report (see SAEP-329).
4.3 Distribution
The Project Leader is responsible for distributing the signed-off Initial and Abbreviated
PEPs. For Full PEPs, the Project Manager is responsible. Original and updated
electronic or hard copies of the Initial, Abbreviated, and Full PEPs will be distributed.
Distribution includes the PEP signatories and Materials Supply's Projects Procurement
Department. In addition, copies of revised PEPs shall be distributed to signatories of
Rev. 0 PEPs.
4.4 Confidentiality
Any conflicts between this document and other applicable Mandatory Saudi Aramco
Engineering Requirements (MSAERs) shall be addressed in writing to the EK&RD
Coordinator.
Any deviation from the requirements herein shall follow internal company procedure
SAEP-302, Waiver of a Mandatory Saudi Aramco Engineering Requirement.
Exhibits
SECTION TITLE
- APPROVAL SHEET
- REVISION CONTROL
1 PROJECT SUMMARY
2 CONTRACTING
3 MATERIAL PROCUREMENT
4 PRE-COMMISSIONING AND MECHANICAL COMPLETION PLAN
5 COMMISSIONING AND START-UP PLAN
6 PROJECT COST
7 PROJECT SCHEDULE
8 PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND INTERFACES
9 VALUE IMPROVING PRACTICES
(including PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT)
10 PROJECT SAFETY
11 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
12 PROJECT CLOSEOUT REPORTS
13 CONTRACTOR SAUDIZATION PLAN
14 MAXIMIZING IN-KINGDOM ENGINEERING,
PROCUREMENT AND CONSTRUCTION WORK
15 PROJECTS WITHIN EXISTING FACILITIES
(NON-GRASS ROOTS)
16 AREAS OF CONCERN
17 EXHIBITS
_____________________________________ _____________
PROJECT LEADER DATE
FACILITIES PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
DEPARTMENT MANAGER DATE
PROPONENT ORGANIZATION
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
PROJECT SPONSOR DATE
OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION
APPROVE:
_____________________________________ ______________
DEPARTMENT MANAGER or Higher DATE
CONSTRUCTION AGENCY
_____________________________________ _____________
PROJECT MANAGER DATE
PROJECT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
_____________________________________ ______________
DEPARTMENT MANAGER DATE
PROJECT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT
_____________________________________ ______________
GENERAL MANAGER DATE
AREA PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
DEPARTMENT MANAGER DATE
PROPONENT ORGANIZATION
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
PROJECT SPONSOR DATE
OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
VICE PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE
PROPONENT ORGANIZATION
APPROVE:
____________________________________ ________________
VICE PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
_____________________________________ _____________
PROJECT MANAGER DATE
CONSTRUCTION AGENCY
_____________________________________ ______________
DEPARTMENT MANAGER DATE
CONSTRUCTION AGENCY DEPARTMENT
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
DEPARTMENT MANAGER DATE
PROPONENT ORGANIZATION
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
PROJECT SPONSOR DATE
OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
VICE PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE
PROPONENT ORGANIZATION
APPROVE:
_____________________________________ ______________
GENERAL MANAGER DATE
AREA CONSTRUCTION AGENCY
_____________________________________ _____________
PROJECT MANAGER DATE
CONSTRUCTION AGENCY
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
DEPARTMENT MANAGER DATE
PROPONENT ORGANIZATION
CONCUR:
_____________________________________ ______________
PROJECT SPONSOR DATE
OPERATIONS ORGANIZATION
APPROVE:
_____________________________________ ______________
VICE PRESIDENT/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATE
PROPONENT ORGANIZATION
LSTK CONTRACT
IFP: mm/yy
Award: mm/yy
Compl: mm/yy LSPB CONTRACT
GES Service
Order Open Solicitation with Selective
PACKAGE Bidding
NO.2 IFP: mm/yy
Award: mm/yy IFP: mm/yy
Compl: mm/yy Award: mm/yy
MC: mm/yy
Procurement
DBSP Appr'd. 56D
Proj Proposal Detailed Design
10 Months
DBSP- Compl.
DBSP
Procurement
MC
CS
Construction
O.S
Commissioning Startup
ERC
ER Completion
Project Execution Plan
SAEP-12
Page 32 of 41
* Additional Milestone dates should be shown for required Government approval, as applicable
Document Responsibility: Project Management Office Standards Committee SAEP-12
Publish Date: 21 April 2020
Next Revision: 15 September 2019 Project Execution Plan
Project Characterization
Document History
21 April 2020 Editorial revision to change contact person.
8 September 2015 Editorial revision to reflect the final two paragraphs are applicable to the entire
Section 4.2.2 and not just with Section 4.2.2.3.
11 January 2015 Editorial revision to clarify definitions and update references and links.
15 September 2014 Revised the Next Planned Update, reaffirmed the content of the document, and reissued
as major revision to incorporate ATP-Capital Efficiency’s CMS requirements.