Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article Applied Acoustics Revised
Article Applied Acoustics Revised
Article Applied Acoustics Revised
net/publication/251448260
CITATIONS READS
243 1,560
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Philippe Glé on 09 February 2018.
Abstract
This article is devoted to the acoustical properties of hemp concrete, a “green” building material. In the study, hemp concretes made
of different binders and different kinds of particles were characterised, and then modeled using equivalent-fluid models. Further, it
is shown that the sound absorption of these materials can be controlled and significantly enhanced by means of suitable constituents
and fabrication processes. Finally, good results are provided by the models.
Keywords: Acoustics, Sound absorption, Multi-scale porosity, Vegetable particles, Hemp concrete, Hemp shiv
Hemp shiv S1 S2 S3
Mean length (mm) 9 8 4
Mean width (mm) 2.5 2.5 1
Figure 1: A hemp culture Mean thickness (mm) 0.5
REV (mass - g) 3.0 2.4 3.7
The different parts of the plant are used. Seeds are harvested REV (number of particles) 500 400 1800
for the feeding of animals and for the fabrication of alimentary
Table 1: Characteristics of the hemp shiv
oil. Then, stems are cut and transformed to obtain, on the one
hand, fibers and on the other hand, the particles called shiv.
High quality paper and insulation wool are made from fibers,
Porosity and density. In this study, only the connected porosity
while particles, which are highly porous, are used for litter and
of the media, noted φ, is considered. Hemp shiv is a granular
as aggregates in hemp concrete. In the following, the study
media so it can be characterised by two porosities, the intra-
focuses only on the particles of hemp, as building materials.
particle porosity φintra and the inter-particle porosity φinter . The
total connected porosity φ of the hemp shiv in bulk can be eval-
1.1.2. Physical characteristics uated knowing φintra and φinter :
Particles size distribution. Particles of hemp can have differ-
ent origins, which means they grew under different climates, φ = φintra + (1 − φintra )φinter = φinter + (1 − φinter )φintra (1)
2
14 16
S1
S2 0.9
12 14
S3
12
10 0.88
10
Surface (%)
Surface (%)
Porosity
8
0.86
8
6
6 0.84 S1 − Measured
4 S2 − Measured
4
S3 − Measured
0.82 S1 − Predicted
2 2 S2 − Predicted
S3 − Predicted
0 0 0.8
0 10 20 30 40 0 2 4 6 8 100 110 120 130 140 150 160
Length (mm) Width (mm) 3
Density (kg/m )
Figure 3: Particles size distribution of the shives [21] (Length distribution and Figure 4: Porosity of the hemp shiv in bulk according to its degree of com-
width distribution) paction
The intra-particle porosity was evaluated previously at 57% Sizes of the pores. As said before, the pores of the hemp shiv
using a 3D tomography (Mateis - INSA Lyon) for samples of in bulk are distributed in two categories, the inter-particle pores
hemp shiv with particles S 1 [21]. Then, the total porosity was and the intra-particle pores. The size of the inter-particle pores
measured with a porosimeter [22] on samples with a diameter is about 1 mm, and is directly linked to the degree of com-
of 46 mm for different degree of compaction of the hemp shiv: paction. For the intra-particle pores, a 3D tomography of a
particle of shiv S 1 done in the study mentioned above [21] and
• the low degree of compaction (ρ = 102kg/m3 ) where the presented in Figure 5 clearly shows microporosity, with two
particles are only poured, characteristic sizes. The first network of pores is characterised
by a size of about 70 µm (responsible for 15% of the intra-
• the intermediate degree of compaction (ρ = 123kg/m3 )
particle porosity), whereas the second one has a size of about
where the particles are poured and shaken,
400 µm (responsible for 85% of the intra-particle porosity).
• the high degree of compaction (ρ = 157kg/m3 ) where the
particles are mechanically compacted.
Hemp shiv S1 S2 S3 Resistivity. The shiv static airflow resistance was measured fol-
ρF (kg/m3 ) 820 860 1060 lowing the standard ISO 9053 on samples with a diameter of 93
mm and a height of 10 cm. The measurements were made for
Table 2: Density of the frame of the hemp shiv each hemp shiv and for each degree of compaction on three dif-
ferent samples and were averaged. Results shown in Figure 6
The porosity decreases naturally with the degree of com- point out that the resistivity of hemp shiv increases for small
paction of the shiv, but also depends on the size of the particles particles and for high degree of compaction. Indeed, the more
as it is shown by Figure 4, since the densities of the frame differ compacted the shiv, or the smaller the particles, the smaller the
between the shives. That is why the hemp shiv S 3 has a greater size of the inter-particle pores, and the higher the air flow resis-
porosity, while S 1 and S 2 present close values. tance, mostly linked to it.
3
Binders A B C
16000 Mass content of powder (%) 64.3 64.3 66.4
S1
14000 S2
Mass content of water (%) 35.7 35.7 33.2
S3 Mass content of retarding agent (%) 0 0 0.4
12000 Density of the grains ρG (kg/m3 ) 2800 2700 3200
Resistivity (Nm−4s)
4000
pores, with a diameter of about 1 mm are visible on the faces of
2000 cut samples, especially for samples of binder A (See Figure 7
(a)). This is due to air trapped during the mixing process.
0
100 110 120 130 140 150 160
3
Density (kg/m )
Figure 6: Air flow resistance of the hemp shiv according to its degree of com- P
ores
iz
edi
st
ri
bu onofbi
nde
rA
paction
1.2. Binders
1.2.1. Generalities
In this study, three different binders were tested and com-
pared, two lime based and one cement based binders. For rea-
sons of confidentiality, they are noted A, B and C.
• Binder C is a quick natural cement. Its hardening is very Resistivity. The static air flow resistance of the samples was
quick, so it implies the use of a retarding agent. then measured using samples with a diameter of 46 mm and a
height of 5 cm. The results are presented in Table 4.
1.2.2. Physical characteristics
Binders A B C
Samples of binder were produced with the mass contents
used in previous studies [5, 6]: about one third of water and Resistivity of the binder (106 Nm−4 s) 3.5 3 3.3
two third of powder of binder (see Table 3). Then, the samples Table 4: Resistivity of the binders
were tested in a stabilised state, once their density was approx-
imately constant. These extremely high values reveal the low permeability of
the samples. Moreover, with such values, it is not even pos-
Porosity and density. Firstly, the density of binder grains ρG
sible to determine if the low differences observed between the
was calculated from the measurement of the porosity of these
samples is due to the binders or to measurement errors.
latter. Then, the density and the porosity of the samples of
binder was also measured. The results are presented in Table
1.3. Hemp concrete
3.
Lime binders (A and B) both present a bigger porosity com- 1.3.1. Generalities
pared to cement binder (C). No significant difference exists Hemp concrete is the result of the mixing of hemp particles,
between the two lime binders. binder and water. This is a green building material that com-
bines a good thermal insulation (λ = 0.06W/moC) and a good
Sizes of the pores. The size of the pores of the different binder acoustical absorption [5]. It is mostly used in buildings for
samples was determined experimentally in a previous study the filling of walls, roofs and floors. Various mixes of hemp
[23]. The porosity of the binder A was investigated using mer- concrete can be produced depending on the binder content, the
cury porosimetry and the characteristic size of the pores in the degree of compaction, the size of the particles and the binder
binder is about 1 µm as shown in Figure 7 (b). Yet, bigger type. In this study, nine different configurations were tested,
4
with hemp concretes made from the three sizes of particles and These equations were applied to the two extreme cases, first
the three different binders mentioned above. In the following, shortly after the mixing considering the total quantity of water,
the term S x − y stands for hemp concrete made with particles and second for the dry case considering the hemp concrete with-
S x and binder y. out water. These theoretical ranges of porosity are presented in
Table 7 between brackets.
1.3.2. Physical characteristics
The mix formulation is given in mass in Table 5 and corre- Porosity (%) Binder
sponds to a formulation called “Wall” [6], which presents an A B C
intermediate binder content. However, these proportions are S1 75 (43 - 78) 75 (43 - 78) 74 (46 - 79)
not rigorously the same for all the samples since they were ad- Shiv S2 67 (43 - 78) 68 (45 - 78) 75 (44 - 79)
justed during the mixing in order to get an ideal and sensible S3 68 (46 - 81) 73 (48 - 81) 72 (50 - 82)
consistency neither too dry (risk of aggregates formation that
would make the final sample heterogeneous) nor too wet (bub- Table 7: Porosity of the samples of hemp concrete
bles would make the mixing more expanded than usual).
The measured values are respectively situated between these
Shiv S1 S2 S3 limits. However, theoretical values must be slightly bigger than
Binder A B C A B C A B C the measured ones, since they are based on the assumption that
Hemp 16 16 17 16 17 16 16 17 17 the porosity of each constituent remains accessible. This is no
Powder 32 32 33 32 33 32 32 33 34 longer the case when binder penetrates into particle pores.
Water 51 51 50 51 50 51 51 50 49
Sizes of the pores. The specificity of the hemp concrete is that
R.A. 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2 0 0 0.2
the total porosity measured and given in Table 7 corresponds to
Table 5: Mix formulation of the hemp concretes tested. The mass contents of the sum of the porosity of three different networks of pores:
hemp shiv, powder of binder and retarding agent (R.A.) are given in %
• The inter-particle porosity φinter ,
As for the binder, the measurements presented below were particle
made on stabilised samples. • The intra-particle porosity φintra ,
Porosity and density. The density of the different formulations • The intra-binder porosity φbinder
intra .
of hemp concrete are given in Table 6.
The main difficulty is that binder interacts with the particles
particle
Density (kg/m ) 3
Binder and it is difficult to know how much φinter and φintra are af-
A B C fected. We can assume that the binder has a more significant
influence on the inter-particle pores, but we can also suppose
S1 390 420 330 that it creates a thin layer around the particles and obstructs the
Shiv S2 400 390 310 intra-particle pores.
S3 420 420 420 Thus, the porous network of the hemp concrete is defined
Table 6: Density of the samples of hemp concrete by four different sizes of pores, which are the size of the intra-
binder pores (about 1 µm), the two sizes of the intra-particle
The density of the stabilised samples is about 400 kg/m3 , but pores (about 70 µm and 400 µm ) and the size of the inter-
in two cases (S 1 − C and S 2 − C), it is clearly lower. That particle pores (about 1 mm). Yet, in this study, the pore size
is due to an excess of water introduced in the mixing, which distribution of the hemp concretes was not determined because
turned into pores after drying. of the irregularity of the shapes of the pores, presented for ex-
The porosity was then measured on samples with a diameter ample in Figure 8 for the hemp concrete S 1 − B. Usually, pore
of 46 mm and a height of 5 cm (see Table 7). Porosities of size distribution are determined for porous media having pores
hemp concrete are close to each other, so that the effect of either with regular shape, such as circular, triangular or slit shapes
binder or particles size distribution can not be discussed. [20, 24].
The range of theoretical possible values for the total porosity These scales do not necessarily all take part into the phenom-
was also evaluated. This was done considering the frame den- ena of dissipation into the material.
sity ρF and the introduced mass M of each constituent in the
hemp concrete. So, we have: Resistivity. Finally, the resistivity of the hemp concretes was
measured following the standard ISO 9053, using samples with
T otal volume − Frame volume a diameter of 10 cm and a height of 10 cm. The measurements
φtheoretical = (3)
T otal volume were repeated on three samples from the same fabrication and
averaged. Their mean values are given in Table 8.
With:
The influence of the size of the particles and of the binder
X M(constituent) on the resistivity of hemp concretes is not clear. However, it
Frame volume = (4)
ρ (constituent)
constituents F
appears that the binder has the effect of increasing the air flow
5
1
200
400
0.9
600 0.8
800
1000
0.7
Sound absorption
1200
0.6
1400
1600
0.5
1800
0.4
2000
0.2
Size 1
0.1 Size 2
Figure 8: Pore shapes of hemp concrete S 1 − B
Size 3
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Resistivity (Nm−4 s) Binder Frequency (Hz)
A B C
S1 11000 31300 33300 Figure 9: Sound absorption of hemp shiv for various sizes of the particles -
Shiv S2 73000 32300 55700 Low degree of compaction
S3 20300 19300 24700
dence of the contact conditions between the shiv and the tube). 0.2
Besides, these samples had namely the same degree of com- 0.1
paction, but the position and orientation of the particles might
0
be slightly different. The Results are presented in Figure 9 for 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Frequency (Hz)
the example of a low degree of compaction.
First, the figure shows that the reproducibility is good, and
that the preparation of the sample has a minor incidence. Then, Figure 10: Sound absorption of hemp concrete for various sizes of the particles
it shows an interesting consequence of the size of the particles - Binder B
on the sound absorption. The acoustical properties of the shives
6
1
2.1.2. Type of binder Binder A
Then, the effect of the binder was also explored, working 0.9 Binder B
with samples of pure binder, and with samples of hemp con- Binder C
0.8
crete. 0.7
Sound absorption
0.6
Effect on the absorption of the binder samples. Firstly, samples
of the three binders described in Section 1.2.2 (without shiv) 0.5
with a diameter of 10 cm were tested (see Figure 11). These 0.4
binders are very reflexive so that thick samples are hard to char-
0.3
acterise. That is why authors tested samples of binder having a
thickness of 5 cm. 0.2
0.1
0.5
Binder A 0
0.45 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Binder B Frequency (Hz)
0.4 Binder C
0.35
Figure 12: Sound absorption of hemp concrete according to the binder
Sound absorption
0.3
0.25
times for the same reasons explained Section 2.1.1. The results
0.2
for the particles S 2 is presented in Figure 13.
0.15
1
0.1
0.9
0.05
0.8
0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 0.7
Frequency (Hz)
Sound absorption
0.6
0.4
This latter is particularly low, under 10% in the studied fre- 0.3
quency range. Yet, the absorption of the binder A is signifi-
0.2
cantly bigger than the absorption of the other binders. This fact Low degree of compaction
0.1 Intermediate degree of compaction
can be explained by the presence of big pores (size of about 1 High degree of compaction
mm) visible on the faces of this kind of binder (see Figure 7). 0
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
Frequency (Hz)
Effect on the absorption of the hemp concretes. Secondly, this
effect was tested on the samples of hemp concrete. Figure 12
Figure 13: Sound absorption of hemp shiv according to its degree of com-
compares the hemp concretes made with particles S 3. These paction
measurements were made with the big impedance tube.
As it can be seen, binder A loses its singularity in the hemp We note that the compaction of the hemp shiv has a big inci-
concretes. This can be explained by the fact that during the mix- dence on its sound absorption. On the one hand, the compaction
ing, the particules prevents the formation of the bigger pores of tends to translate the acoustic absorption curve (first and second
binder A. However, it appears that the hemp concretes made peak of absorption) towards the low frequencies. On the other
with lime binders, A and B, have a greater sound absorption. hand, it plays a significant role on the amplitude of the sound
We can make the assumption that this is due to the differences absorption, which is maximum for the intermediate degree of
already observed in porosity (see Table 3). compaction. Comparing Figures 9 and 13, one sees that the de-
gree of compaction has a bigger effect on the sound absorption
2.2. Influence of the fabrication process of hemp shiv than the particles size distribution. It seems also
2.2.1. Degree of compaction of particles that what matters most is not the particles size distribution but
The sound absorption of hemp concretes relies strongly on the density of the samples of shiv.
their fabrication process, starting with the degree of compaction
of the particles. Yet, in this study, each hemp concrete sample 2.2.2. Quantity of binder
was made with the same degree of compaction, so that this ef- The fabrication process is further defined by the quantity
fect was only analysed on hemp shiv in bulk. The three degrees of constituents introduced in the mixing. In a previous study
of compaction presented in Section 1.1.2 were compared for [5, 6], V. Cerezo tested the incidence of the binder content on
each size of particles. The measurements were repeated three the sound absorption coefficient of hemp concretes. To sum up
7
this study, several hemp concretes were fabricated with differ-
ent binder contents. The volume concentration of binder in the
samples varied between 9% and 51%. The results of this previ- 1
ous study are presented in Figure 14 for 10 cm thick samples. Uper face
Sound absorption
Lower face
0.5
0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Frequency (Hz)
b c
Figure 14: Sound absorption of hemp concrete according to the binder content
[5, 6]
Figure 15: Sound absorption of the two faces of the sample of hemp concrete
Thus, increasing the binder content is equivalent to decreas- S 1 − A (a), photographs of the upper face (b) and the lower face (c) of the
ing the porosity, so that the sound absorption is strongly re- sample
duced.
Lower face
when too much water is introduced, two phenomena happen.
In the first place, the mixing becomes bullous, so that its 0.5
compaction becomes difficult. Secondly, the excess of water
retreats to the lower face of the sample. Then, this water mixed
with binder dries and turns into a thin layer in contact with the 0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
mould of the sample. Among the nine formulations of hemp Frequency (Hz)
concrete, three were fabricated with this unwanted excess of a
water. The sound absorption of the lower face of such samples
is strongly affected by this phenomenon.
Lower face terial [25, 26]. In the present study, the frame movement is
neglected.
0.5
The samples of hemp shiv and hemp concrete were modeled
using two equivalent-fluid models. Models based on as few
parameters as possible were sought in order to avoid the de-
0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 termination of too many parameters. Yet, it is not possible to
Frequency (Hz)
neglect the effects of porosity, airflow resistance or tortuosity
a on the acoustical properties of granular materials [27, 28]. So,
the simplest models that can be used in this study have three pa-
rameters. Two parameters were directly measured in this study:
the connected porosity and the airflow resistance. The unknown
quantity is the tortuosity of the samples.
In these models, the acoustical properties of a material are
described with two complex quantities. The equivalent dy-
namic density ρeq treats the visco-inertial dissipation in the me-
dia. The equivalent dynamic bulk modulus Keq takes into ac-
count the thermal dissipation effect.
α
Data
- γ: the ratio of the specific heats of the air (1.4) Model
- P0 : the static pressure of the air (105 Pa) 0
500 1000 1500 2000
- NPr : the Prandtl number of the air (0.71) 10 0
Re(ρ/ρ0)
Im(ρ/ρ0)
And the following parameters describing the porous media: 5 −5
- φ: the open porosity
0 −10
- σ: the air flow resistance (Nm−4 s) 500 1000 1500 2000 500 1000 1500 2000
Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)
- α∞ : the high frequency limit of the tortuosity
3 1
- s: the shape factor
Re(K/P0)
Im(K/P0)
2
0
Then, the sound absorption α can be calculated as α = 1
Z−Z0 0 −1
Z+Z0 with Z the surface impedance of the sample, and Z0 the 500 1000 1500 2000 500 1000 1500 2000
impedance of the air (about 400 kg.m−2 .s−1 ). For a hard backing Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)
3.1.2. Evaluation of the parameters density ρ decreases, whereas the dynamic density predicted us-
• The open porosity φ and the resistivity σ were directly ing Biot-Allard model is relatively constant. Fitting the tortu-
measured on the samples as described in Section 1, osity or the shape factor in a physical range did not allow to
approach the dynamic density and the sound absorption of the
• Then, the high frequency limit of the tortuosity α∞ was ad-
material. This shows clearly that the Biot-Allard model is not
justed to get the best agreement between the measurement
adapted for hemp concretes.
of the dynamic density and the modelling,
• Usually, the shape factor s is adjusted to make the model fit φ(%) σ(Nm−4 s) α∞
the measurements [32]. This parameter is defined between 73 19300 3.0
0.8 for narrow slits and 1.1 for equilateral triangular pores
Table 10: Parameters of the modelling of hemp concrete - S 3 − B
[30]. In this study, since an adjustment is already done
using the tortuosity, the shape factor was set by default at
unity.
3.2. Johnson model
3.1.3. Results In Section 3.1, we saw that a three parameters model is suffi-
In this section, the modelling of the samples is compared to cient to predict the acoustical properties of hemp shiv. But this
the measurements of sound absorption, dynamic density and is no longer the case for hemp concretes, for which the dynamic
bulk modulus. These measurements were performed using a density is not well predicted. So in a second step, in order to
three microphones method [34]. improve this modelling of hemp concretes taking more accu-
rately into account the visco-inertial effects, another parameter
Hemp shiv. For the hemp shiv in bulk, in every case, as shown was added. A model based upon the contributions of Johnson
in Figure 19 for the hemp shiv S 2 - Intermediate degree of com- et al. [14] was used.
paction, the agreement is good between the modelling and the
measurement. 3.2.1. Description of the model
In this model, ρeq is defined by Johnson et al. [14] to predict
φ(%) σ(Nm−4 s) α∞ more accurately the visco-inertial dissipation.
85 4600 2.3 s
α∞ ρ0 jσφ 4α2∞ ηρ0 ω
Table 9: Parameters of the modelling of hemp shiv S 2 - Intermediate degree of ρeq (ω) = 1 − 1 + j 2 2 2 (9)
compaction φ ωρ0 α∞ σ Λφ
η is the viscosity of the air (1.84 10−5 Pl) and Λ the viscous
Hemp concretes. The model was applied to hemp concrete characteristic length describing the size of the interconnections
samples, for example with the hemp concrete S 3−B. As we can between pores in the porous media.
see in Figure 20, there are big differences between the sound ab- Besides, since previous section showed that the expression
sorption predicted by Biot-Allard model and the measurements. of Zwikker and Kosten predicts pretty well the measured bulk
Experimentally, we observe that the real part of the dynamic modulus Keq , this expression is reused.
10
Data Data
1 Model 1 Biot−Allard Model
Johnson Model
0.5 0.5
α
α
0 0
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
40 0 40 0
Re(ρ/ρ0)
Re(ρ/ρ0)
Im(ρ/ρ0)
Im(ρ/ρ0)
20 20
−50 −50
0 0
100 200 300 400 100 200 300 400 100 200 300 400 100 200 300 400
Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)
5 3 5 3
Re(K/P0)
Re(K/P0)
Im(K/P0)
Im(K/P0)
2 2
1 1
0 0
0 −1 0 −1
100 200 300 400 100 200 300 400 100 200 300 400 100 200 300 400
Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz) Frequency (Hz)
Figure 20: Modelling of the sound absorption α, the normalised dynamic den- Figure 21: Modelling of the sound absorption α, the normalised dynamic den-
sity ρ/ρ0 , and the normalised bulk modulus K/P0 of hemp concrete - S 3 − B sity ρ/ρ0 , and the normalised bulk modulus K/P0 of hemp concrete - S 3 − B
3.2.2. Evaluation of the parameters Hemp concrete is characterised by its high porosity that com-
• The open porosity and the resistivity were directly mea- bines the microscopic pores of its binder and its vegetable par-
sured on the samples, ticles, and bigger pores between the particles. Thus, its sound
absorption is intermediate between the excellent absorption of
• Then, the high frequency limit of the tortuosity and the vis- hemp shiv, and the reflexion of the binder.
cous characteristic length were predicted using an indirect Besides, another convenience of the hemp concretes was
characterisation method [35]. In this method, analytical shown: its sensibility to several parameters. It enables control
solutions derived from the Johnson et al. model [14] en- of the acoustic absorption of the material, for instance, with the
able to extract these parameters from the measurement of choice of the constituents and of the fabrication process. To
the real and imaginary parts of the dynamic density of the conclude, hemp concretes made with lime binders and small
material, particles are particularly good acoustical absorbents.
These acoustical properties were then modeled using
• The shape factor s was set at unity. equivalent-fluid models. For the hemp shives, the predictions
of a three parameters model provided good agreement with ex-
periment. For hemp concretes, a four parameters model had to
3.2.3. Results
be used to get more accurate predictions.
The model was applied to the samples of hemp concrete. For The next objective of the authors is to link the parameters of
example, Figure 21 compares the measurements and the two the models: porosity, airflow resistance, tortuosity and viscous
modelling approaches for the hemp concrete S 3 − B. It appears characteristic length, to the main characteristics of the material:
that introducing the viscous characteristic length has a big in- density, size of the particles and binder content.
cidence on the modelling of sound absorption, so that the pre-
diction using the Johnson model is a lot more accurate than the
Biot-Allard model. Indeed, the real and imaginary parts of the Acknowledgment
dynamic density are better estimated with this model. The authors would like to thank laboratory Mateis of INSA
Lyon for its valuable collaboration and the reviewers for their
φ(%) σ(Nm−4 s) α∞ Λ(m) constructive comments improving the manuscript.
73 19300 3.0 23 10−6 [1] M.-J. Swift, P. Bris, K.-V. Horoshenkov, Acoustic absorption in re-cycled
rubber granulate, Applied Acoustics 57 (1993) 203–212. 1
Table 11: Parameters of the modelling of hemp concrete - S 3 − B [2] I.-M. Rushforth, K.-V. Horoshenkov, M. Miraftab, M.-J. Swift, Impact
sound insulation and viscoelastic properties of underlay manufactured
from recycled carpet waste, Applied Acoustics 66 (2005) 731–749. 1
[3] C. Wassilief, Sound absorption of wood-based materials, Applied Acous-
tics 48 (1996) 339–356. 1
Conclusion [4] H.-S. Yang, D.-J. Kim, H.-J. Kim, Rice straw wood particle composite for
sound absorbing wooden construction materials, Bioresource Technology
86 (2003) 117–121. 1
In this study, the acoustical properties of a “green” building [5] L. Arnaud, V. Cerezo, Qualification physique des matériaux de construc-
material, hemp concrete, were investigated, working with dif- tion à base de chanvre - Rapport final - Programme de juin 1998 à août
ferent kinds of binder and different sizes of particles. 2001, Contrat de recherche CNRS 071462 (2001) 659–678. 1, 4, 7, 8
11
[6] V. Cerezo, Propriétés mécaniques, thermiques et acoustiques d’un Acoustique 3 (1990) 28–30. 9
matériau base de particules végétales: approche expérimentale et [32] Y. Champoux, M.-R. Stinson, On acoustical models for sound propaga-
modélisation théorique, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole doctorale MEGA, Lyon tion in rigid frame porous materials and the influence of shape factors,
(2005). 1, 4, 5, 7, 8 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92 (2) (1992) 1120–1131.
[7] D. Samri, Analyse physique et caractérisation hygrothermique des 9, 10
matériaux de construction: approche expérimentale et modélisation [33] C. Zwikker, C.-W. Kosten, Sound absorbing materials, Elsevier, New-
numérique, Ph.D. thesis, Ecole doctorale MEGA, Lyon (2008). 1 York (1949) 174. 9
[8] M.-P. Boutin, C. Flamin, S. Quinton, G. Gosse, Analyse du cycle de vie : [34] T. Iwase, Y. Izumi, R. Kawabata, A new measuring method for sound
Compounds thermoplastiques chargés fibres de chanvre et Mur en béton propagation constant by using sound tube without any air spaces back of
de chanvre banché sur ossature bois, Rapport d’Étude INRA Lille, Réf. a test material, Internoise 98, Christchurch, New Zealand (1998) 4. 10
MAP 04 B1 0501. (2005) 32. 1 [35] X. Olny, R. Panneton, J. Tran-Van, An indirect acoustical method for de-
[9] A. Laukaitis, B. Fiks, Acoustical properties of aerated autoclaved con- termining intrinsic parameters of porous materials, Proceedings of the 2nd
crete, Applied Acoustics 67 (2006) 284–296. 1 Biot conference, Grenoble (2002) 6. 11
[10] O. Umnova, K. Attenborough, E. Standley, A. Cummings, Behavior of
rigid-porous layers at high levels of continuous acoustic excitation: The-
ory and experiment, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114 (3)
(2003) 1346–1356. 1
[11] S. B. Park, D. S. Seo, J. Lee, Studies on the sound absorption character-
istics of porous concrete based on the content of recycled aggregate and
target void ratio, Cement and Concrete Research 35 (2005) 1846–1854. 1
[12] J.-F. Allard, Propagation of sound in porous media, Applied Science
(1993) 284. 1
[13] M.-E. Delany, E.-N. Bazley, Acoustical properties of fibrous absorbent
materials, Applied Acoustics 3 (1970) 105–116. 1
[14] D.-L. Johnson, J. Koplik, R. Dashen, Theory of dynamic permeability and
tortuosity in fluid-saturated porous media, Fluid Mechanics 176 (1987)
379–402. 1, 10, 11
[15] Y. Champoux, J.-F. Allard, Dynamic tortuosity and bulk modulus in air-
saturated porous media, Applied Physics 70 (1991) 1975–1979. 1
[16] D. Lafarge, P. Lemarinier, J.-F. Allard, V. Tarnow, Dynamic compressi-
bility of air in porous structures at audible frequencies, Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America 102 (4) (1997) 1995–2006. 1
[17] S.-R. Pride, F.-D. Morgan, A.-F. Gangi, Drag forces of porous-medium
acoustics, Physical Review B 47 (1993) 4964–4975. 1
[18] X. Olny, C. Boutin, Acoustic wave propagation in double porosity media,
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114 (1) (2003) 73–89. 1
[19] N. Atalla, R. Panneton, F. Sgard, X. Olny, Acoustic absorption of macro-
perforated porous materials, Journal of Sound and Vibration 243 (4)
(2001) 659–678. 1
[20] G. Pispola, K.-V. Horoshenkov, A. Khan, Comparison of two modeling
aproaches for highly heterogeneous porous media, Journal of the Acous-
tical Society of America 121 (2) (2007) 961–966. 1, 5
[21] I. Ceyte, Béton de chanvre, définition des caractéristiques mécaniques de
la chènevotte, Travail de Fin d’Études, ENTPE (2008) 155. 2, 3
[22] L. Beranek, Acoustic impedance of porous materials, Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America 13 (1942) 248–260. 3
[23] S. Goyer, Caractérisation des propriétés microstructurales et hydriques
des bétons légers, Master recherche MEGA, Lyon (2007) 110. 4
[24] K.-V. Horoshenkov, K. Attenborough, S.-N. Chandler-Wilde, Pade ap-
proximants for the acoustical properties of rigid frame porous media with
pore size distributions, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
104 (3) (2007) 1198–1209. 5
[25] M.-A. Biot, Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated
porous solid. I.Low-frequency range, Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America 28 (1956) 168–178. 9
[26] M.-A. Biot, Theory of propagation of elastic waves in a fluid-saturated
porous solid. II.High-frequency range, Journal of the Acoustical Society
of America 28 (1956) 179–191. 9
[27] K. Attenborough, On the acoustic slow wave in air-filled granular media,
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81 (1) (1987) 93–102. 9
[28] C. Boutin, Estimates and bounds of dynamic permeability of granular
media, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (6) (2008) 3576–
3593. 9
[29] N. Voronina, K.-V. Horoshenkov, A new empirical model for the acoustic
properties of loose granular media, Applied Acoustics 64 (2003) 415–
432. 9
[30] M.-R. Stinson, Y. Champoux, Propagation of sound and the assignment of
shape factors in model porous materials having simple pore geometries,
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91 (2) 685–695. 9, 10
[31] J.-F. Allard, C. Depollier, J. Nicolas, W. Lauriks, A. Cops, Propriétés
acoustiques des matériaux poreux saturés d’air et théorie de Biot, J.
12