Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NURES
NURES
1. Phenomenological Studies
a. “Lived experience”
b. Examines human experiences through descriptions provided by the
people involved
c. Bracketing
● The researcher releases expectations and biases prior to
doing the research.
d. End purpose
● To determine themes and patterns of behavior, etc.
2. Ethnographic Studies
a. Collection and analysis of data about cultural groups.
b. End purpose
● To develop cultural theories.
c. Method
● Participant observation and interviews with “key
informants”
3. Grounded Theory Studies
a. Data are collected and analyzed and then a theory is developed
that is grounded on the data.
b. Method
● Purposeful sampling, done in field or naturalistic setting.
c. Concerned with generation rather than testing the hypothesis.
4. Historical Studies
a. Identification, location, evaluation, and synthesis of data of the past
b. End purpose
● To relate the past to the present and the future.
c. Sources of data for historical research
1. Documents
a. Oral history, written research, diaries,
eyewitness accounts, pictorial services.
2. Relics and artifacts
a. Physical evidence.
d. Classification of sources can be:
1. Primary
a. An account of the event from the person
himself.
2. Secondary
a. Summarized or retold by another.
e. Evaluation or Critism of the data
1. External
a. Authentically or genuineness of the source
2. Internal
a. Accuracy of the data in the source.
5. Case study
● In-depth examination of people.
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Steps:
1. Identify the problem
a. Broad topic, narrowed down
b. May be the most difficult and will take the most amount of time
c. Sources of study problems
i. Personal experiences
ii. Literature sources
iii. Previous research
iv. Testing of theories
i. Ethical issues
ii. Significance to nursing
iii. Personal motivation
iv. Researcher qualifications
v. Feasibility of the study
1. Time
2. Cost
3. Equipment and Supplies
4. Administrative support
5. Peer support
6. Availability of Subjects
2. Determine the purpose of the study
a. Define why the study ids being made (often mistakenly interchanged
with problem statement).
b. Must state the significance and use of the study results in order to get
approval.
c. Eg. To develop a better understanding of the significance of
consumption of fast food in the growing number of cases of obesity
and overweight among school aged children.
3. Review of Related Literature
a. Purpose
i. To determine what knowledge already exist on the topic to
be studied.
ii. To develop a conceptual and theoretical framework for the
study.
iii. To help the researcher plan the study methods (eg.
Instrument and tools).
b. Primary vs. Secondary sources
i. Theoretical framework
▪ Broad, general explanation of the relationships between
concept of interest in a research study.
▪ Based on the existing theory.
ii. Conceptual framework
● Explains relationship between concept but links concepts
selected from several theories, from previous research
results, and from the researcher’s own experience.
● Eg. Maslows Hierarchy of Needs Theory and Job
satisfaction theory.
e. Theory Generation and Development
i. Deductive reasoning
● Proceeds form general to specific.
● Eg. Maslow’s Hierarchy of needs – job satisfaction scale.
● Theory -> Propositional statement -> Hypothesis ->
Empirical data.
ii. Inductive reasoning
▪ Proceeds from specific to general
▪ Empirical date -> Empirical Generalization ->
Propositional statement -> theory.
▪ Eg. Observed that workers who receive low salaries have
poor work performance – job satisfaction theory.
f. Two types of theories
i. Grand theory
▪ Address a broad range of phenomena in the environment
or humanity.
ii. Middle-range theory
▪ Concerned only with a small area of the environment or
human experiences.
▪ Middle range theories have been found to be more
valuable to nursing research than grand theories.
5. Identify the Study Assumption
▪ Assumptions
o Beliefs that are held to be true but have not
necessary been proven.
o Eg. Fast food makes you fat.
▪ Three types of assumptions:
i. Universal assumptions
▪ Beliefs assumed to be true by a large percentage of
society.
▪ Eg. “Fast food makes you fat”.
ii. Assumptions based on theory or research findings
▪ Using another research finding assumptions as the basis
of one’s study.
▪ Eg. An existing research finding may have stated an
assumption that children who eat fast food twice a week
tend to be twice more likely to become overweight than
children who eat only once a week.
iii. Assumptions that are necessary to carry out the study
▪ In the mentioned research, the assumption that children
who study in elementary schools are of “school-age”.
6. Acknowledge the Limitation of the study
a. Limitations
▪ Uncontrolled variables that may affect the study results and limit
the generalizability of the findings.
▪ Extraneous Variables
▪ Also called Confounding or uncontrolled
▪ Variables over which the researcher either has no control or chooses
not to exercise control.
▪ Eg. The attitudes and beliefs of parents of children involved in the
study is not being something that the researcher can control.
b. Delimitations
▪ Limitations placed on the research by the researcher
himself.
c. Scope
▪ The extent to which the study will be made.
▪ Hypothesis
o Predicts the relationship between two or more
variables.
o Problem statements ask the question, hypothesis
gives a predicted answer.
▪ Characteristics of a hypothesis
i. Declarative form
ii. Written in present tense
iii. Reflects the problem statement
iv. Contains the population and the variables
v. Must be testable or empirically verifiable
▪ Simple
a. Relationship between one independent and one dependent variable.
▪ Complex
▪ Relationship between two or more independent or dependent
variables.
▪ An interaction effect would concern the action of two variables in
conjunction with each other.
▪ Null
i. No relationship exists between two variables.
▪ Research
ii. There is a relationship, states the expected relationship.
▪ Nondirectional
iii. Mere prediction that a relationship exists.
▪ Directional
iv. Researcher further predicts the type of relationship.
▪ Importance
o To make the meaning of terminologies and variables
clearer to the researcher and the reader.
o To allow for replication of the study.
▪ Operational definitions
o Indicates hoow a variable will be observed or
measured.
o Eg. Weight – can be measured in kilograms or
pounds.
i. Qualitative
ii. Quantitative
a. Experimental
▪ Concerned with cause and effect relationships.
▪ Highly respected in the scientific world.
▪ Must have: Manipulation or control of independent variable,
random selection of subjects, measurement of independent and
dependent variable.
▪ More control can be exercised over extraneous variables.
▪ In nursing experimental, a nursing intervention is usually
introduced.
▪ Internal validity
o Degree to which changes in dependent variable can
be directly attributed to the independent variable.
o Can have the following as threats to validity:
▪ Selection Bias
o Results are due to subject differences before the
independent variables was manipulated.
▪ History
o Some event other than the experimental treatment
occurs during the study that influenced the dependent
variable.
▪ Maturation
o Changes that occur within the subjects during an
experiment study influences the study results.
▪ Instrumentation Change
o Difference between the pretest and the post test
measurement caused by a change in the accuracy of the
instrument of the judge’s ratings.
o Avoided by trial runs, or training sessions for judges prior
to rating.
▪ Mortality
o Subject dropout rate is different between the
experimental and comprison group.
▪ External Validity
i. Degree to which the study results can be generalized to other
people and other settings. Threats include:
i. Hawthrone effect
1. Study participants respond in a certain manner
because there are aware that they are being
observed.
a. True Experimental
▪ Researcher has great deal of control over the
research situation.
▪ 3 criteria: Manipulation of variables; One
experimental and one comparison group (control
group).
▪ Subjects are randomly assigned
R X O1 (Experimental Group)
R O1 (Control Group)
b. Quasiexperimental
▪ Missing one criteria for true experimental design.
▪ Time-series designs
▪ Researchers periodically observes measures
the subjects. Experimental treatment is
administered between two of the
observations. 01 02 03 X 04 05 06.
c. Pre-experimental design
▪ Weak researcher has little control over the
research.
i. Correlational Studies
1. Correlation Coefficient
▪ Researcher extent to which one variable (X) is related to
another variable.
a. + Relationship
▪ Also called Direct
▪ As the value of one variable increases, the
value of the other variable also increases.
b. – Relationship
▪ Also called Inverse
▪ As the variable of one value increase, the value
of the other variable decreases.
1. Retrospective studies
▪ Dependent variable identified in the present, and the
independent variable that occurred in the past is
determined.
2. Prospective studies
▪ Independent variable is identified at the present time,
and the subjects are followed in the future to observe
the dependent variable
▪ Eg. Fast food and weight gain.
a. Population
▪ Complete set of individuals or objects the posses some
common characteristics that is of interest to the researcher.
i. Target population
▪ Also called Universe.
▪ The group of people or objects to which the
researcher wishes to generalize the findings of the
study.
ii.Accessible population
▪ That group which is actually available for the study.
a. Sample
▪ A subgroup chosen to represent the population and used to
make generalizations about the population.
i. Probability
▪ Everyone in the population has the chance of being
selected.
a. Proportional stratified
b. Disproportional stratified
1. Convenience sampling
▪ Accidental or incidental.
▪ Choosing readily available people or objects for a study.
▪ Snowball sampling
o Study subjects help refer additional subjects.
2. Quota Sampling
▪ Similar to stratified random but selection not random.
▪ Basis of stratification is determined by the researcher.
▪ Eg. 50% females, 50% male.
3. Purposive sampling
a. Judgmental sampling
b. Handpicking of subjects.
1. Cohort study
▪ Persons are studied who have been born during a
particular time period.
▪ Objectives
▪ To examine issues related to the design, sample size,
data collection procedures and data analysis
approaches.
▪ Can be used to test an instrument, evaluate the study
phenomenon. Etc.
a. Data
▪ Pieces of information or facts that are collected in scientific
investigations.
b. What data will be collected? Who will collect the data? Where will
the data be collected? When will the data be collected? How will
the data be collected? (Why, is answered by the purpose of the
study or the research design, and is not part of this).
i. Questionnaires
▪ Paper and pencil, self-report instrument.
▪ Contains questions the respondents are asked to answer
in writing.
2. Types of questions
a. Demographic
▪ Data on the characteristics of the subjects.
▪ Demographic or attribute variables.
▪ Age, educational background, religion.
b. Open-ended questions
▪ Essay, fill-in-the-blank
c. Closed-ended questions
▪ Respondent is asked to choose from given alternatives.
▪ Must be collectively exhaustive (all possible answer provided) and mutually
exclusive ( no overlap between categories)
d. Contingency questions
▪ Items that is relevant for some respondents and
not for others.
▪ Eg. If yes..
e. Filler questions
a. Items in which the researcher has no direct interest but
are included in a questionnaire to reduce the emphasis
on the specific purpose of other questions.
ii. Interviews
b. Interviewer obtains responses from a subject in a
face-to-face encounter or through a telephone call.
1. Unstructured interview
c. Interviewer given a great deal of freedom to direct the
course of the interview.
d. Conducted more like a normal conversation.
▪ Probes
o Additional prompting questions that encourage
the respondent to elaborate on the topic.
2. Structured interviews
▪ Asking the same questions in the same order and in
the same manner of all respondents in the study.
▪ Even subtle changes in the wording of the interview
may not be permitted.
3. Semi-structured interview
a. Structured
▪ Carried out when the researcher has prior knowledge
about the phenomenon of interest.
▪ Uses a checklist.
b. Unstructured
▪ Researcher attempts to describe events or behaviors
as they occur, with no preconceived idea of what will
be seen.
a. Event
▪ Observation of an entire event.
▪ Eg. Bed making techniques of student nurses.
b. Time
▪ Observation of events or behaviors during specified
times.
▪ Eg. Appetite of patients during scheduled meals.
b. Non-participant observer-covert
▪ Generally not ethical.
▪ Observer does not let participant know of his activity.
▪ Eg. Public behavior (can be ethical)
c. Participant observer-overt
▪ Involved with the subjects openly and subjects know
that they are being observed by the same.
▪ Eg. Immersion with families while observing their
day-to-day lifestyle.
d. Participant observer-covert
▪ “Plant”, “Spy”
▪ Observer interacts with the subjects and observes
their behavior without their knowledge. Rarely ethical.
v. Attitude scales
▪ Self-report, data collection instruments that ask respondents to
report their attitudes or feelings on a continuum.
1. Likert Scale
▪ Uses five or seven responses for each item ranging from
Strongly Agree (5) to strongly disagree (1).
▪ Negatively worded questions are rated scored reverse.
1. Personality Inventories
▪ Self-report measures used to assess the differences in
personality traits, needs, or values of people.
2. Projective Techniques
▪ Subject is presented with an ambiguous stimuli, subject
describes what the stimuli appear to represent.
▪ Eg. Rorschach Inkblot Test.
i. Frequency distribution
▪ Simply counting the occurrence of values or scores represented
in the data.
▪ Appropriate for tabulating all types of data (nominal, ordinal,
interval, ratio).
▪ If range of score is less than 20, each score can be listed
individually, when the range is large you can group them into
“class intervals”
1. Bar graph
▪ Used to represent frequency distribution with nominal
data or some type of ordinal data.
▪ May be horizontal or vertical.
2. Histogram
▪ Uses bars to represent the frequency distribution of a
variable that is measured at the ordinal, interval, or ratio
level.
▪ Has X and Y axis.
3. Frequency polygon
▪ Graph that uses dots connected with straight lines to
represent the frequency distribution or ordinal, interval, or
ratio data.
▪ The class intervals are on the horizontal axis, the
frequency on the vertical axis.
iii. Percentages
▪ Represents the proportion of a subgroup to a total group.
▪ Minimum number for the computation of percentages should be
atleast 20.
i. Mode
▪ Category or value that occurs most often in a set of data
under consideration.
▪ If the data gathered are nominal this is referred to as
“nominal class”.
▪ Maybe unimodal, bimodal, multimodal.
ii. Median
▪ Middle score or value in a group of data.
▪ If number of values is even, the midpoint between the
two middle values is the median. If the number of values
is uneven, then the median is the middle value.
iii. Mean
▪ The average sum of a set of values found by adding all
values and dividing by the total number of values.
▪ X = Total of all values or number of values.
c. Measures of Variability
▪ Measures how spread out values are in a distribution of values.
i. Range
▪ Distance between the highest and lowest value in a
group of values or scores.
▪ Eg. Highest 60, lowest 40, the range is 20.
ii. Percentile
▪ A datum point below which lies a certain percentage of
the values in a frequency distribution.
▪ Eg. NCEE Score, Weight for Age charts in Pediatrics.
iv. Variance
▪ Standard deviation squared.
v. Z-score
d. Measures of Relationships
▪ Measures the correlation between variables.
i. Correlation Coefficients
▪ Pairing the value of each subjects on one variable with
the value on another variable.
▪ Eg. Athletic ability vs. IQ level. Anxiety level vs. pulse
rates.
a. The final step in the research process and yet the most important one
for nursing. No matter how significant the findings may be, they are of
little value to the nursing profession if not communicated to other
collegues.