MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: D. LAPIDEZRUTCHELYN Name of Rater: JEANA M. MEQUIABAS

Position: TEACHER II Position: HEAD TEACHER 1
Date of Review:February 17, 2023
Rating Period: 2022-2023

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
per KRA Results
Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Classroom observation tool (COT) rating sheet and/or Quality

inter-observer agreement form done through onsite/face-
to-face/in-person classroom observation.

Basic
Education Services

Efficiency

Timeliness

If onsite/face-to-face/in person
classroom observation are not
implemented,

❖ Through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous teaching and
other modalities; or

❖ Through observation of a demonstration

teaching *via LAC session
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 2. Used a Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality

Education range of rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services teaching agreement form done through
strategies that onsite/face-to-face/in-person
enhance classroom observation.
learner If onsite/face-to-face/in person
achievement classroom observation are not
in literacy and implemented,
numeracy ❖ Through observation of
skills. (PPST synchronous/asynchronous Efficiency
1.4.2) teaching and othemodalities;
or
❖ Through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via Timeliness
LAC session

Basic 3. Applied a Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality

Education range of rating sheet and/or inter-observer
Services teaching agreement form done through
strategies to onsite/face-to-face/in-person
develop critical classroom observation.
and creative If onsite/face-to-face/in person
thinking, as classroom observation are not
well as other implemented,
higher order ❖ Through observation of
thinking synchronous/asynchronous
skills. (PPST teaching and othemodalities;
1.5.2) or
❖ Through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via
LAC session
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality Needs to Show more
Education Environment classroom rating sheet and/or inter-observer enhance my valid MOVs
Services and Diversity structure to agreement form done through skill on this
of Learners engage onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classroom observation. objective
learners,
individually or
in groups, in If onsite/face-to-face/in person
meaningful classroom observation are not Efficiency Needs to Show more
exploration, implemented, enhance my valid MOVs
discovery and skill on this
hands-on ❖ Through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous objective
activities
within a range teaching and othemodalities;
of physical or
learning
environments. ❖ Through observation of a Timeliness
(PPST 2.3.2) demonstration teaching *via
LAC session

Basic 5. Managed 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality Adopt to a Upgrade skill
Education learner rating sheet and/or inter-observer non-violent non-violent
Services behavior agreement form done through discipline discipline
constructively onsite/face-to-face/in-person
by applying classroom observation.
positive and
non-violent If onsite/face-to-face/in person
discipline to classroom observation are not
ensure learning implemented,
focused
environments ❖ Through observation of
(PSST 2.6.2) synchronous/asynchronous
teaching and othe
modalities; or

❖ Through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via
LAC session
 MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Classroom observation tool (COT) Timeliness
per KRA rating sheet and/or inter-observer
agreement form done through
onsite/face-to-face/in-person
classroom observation.

If onsite/face-to-face/in person
classroom observation are not
implemented,

❖ Through observation of
synchronous/asynchronous
teaching and othemodalities;
or
❖ Through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via
7% LAC session

Basic 6. Used Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality

Educati differentiated, rating sheet and/or inter-observer
on developmenta agreement form done through
Service lly onsite/face-to-face/in-person
s appropriate classroom observation.
learning
experiences to If onsite/face-to-face/in person
address classroom observation are not
learners’ implemented, Efficiency
gender, needs,
strengths, ❖ Through observation of
interests and synchronous/asynchronous
experiences. teaching and othemodalities;
(PPST 3.1.2) or Timeliness

❖ Through observation of a
demonstration teaching *via
LAC session

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
 per KRA Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
ce Target Results
Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 3. 7. Planned, 7% Classroom observation tool (COT) Quality

Educati Curriculum managed and rating sheet and/or inter-observer
on and implemented agreement form done through
Service Planning developmenta onsite/face-to-face/in-person
s lly sequenced classroom observation.
teaching and If onsite/face-to-face/in person
learning classroom observation are not Efficiency
processes to implemented,
meet ❖ Through observation of
curriculum synchronous/asynchronous
requirements teaching and othemodalities;
and varied or
Timeliness
teaching ❖ Through observation of a
contexts. demonstration teaching *via
(PPST 4.1.2) LAC session

8. Participated 1. Proof/s of Quality

in collegial attendance in LAC
discussions Sessions/FGDs/meeting
that use s/other collegial
teacher and discussions
learner
feedback to 2. Minutes of LAC
enrich Sessions/FGDs/meeting
teaching s/ and other collegial
practice.
discussions on the use
(PPST 4.4.2)
of teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
7% teaching practice.
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of
teaching practices
following participations
from LAC
sessions/FGDs/meeting
s/other collegial
discussions that use
 teacher and learner
feedback to enrich
teaching practice with
proof/s of attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
Form/document that
highlights the objective

Basic KRAs 9. Selected, Weight Classroom observation Quality

Educati developed, per KR tool (COT) rating sheet
on organized and 7% and/or
Service used inter-observer agreement
s appropriate form done through
teaching and onsite/face-to-face/in-
learning person classroom
resources, observation If onsite/face-
including ICT, to to-face/in
address learning person classroom
goals. observation are not
(PPST 4.5.2) implemented,
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session

Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% Classroom observation Quality
Educati Assessme selected, tool (COT) rating sheet
on nt and organized and and/or
Service Reporting used inter-observer agreement
s diagnostic, form done through
formative and onsite/face-to-face/in-
summative person classroom
assessment observation
strategies
consistent with If onsite/face-to-face/in
curriculum person classroom
requirements. observation are not
(PPST 5.1.2) implemented,
• Through observation of
synchronous/asynchr
on
ous teaching and other
modalities; or
• Through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session Efficiency

Timeliness

Basic KRAs 11. Monitored Weight Any one of the Quality

Educati and evaluated
following: • Individual
per KRA
on learner
Service progress and Learning Efficiency
s achievement Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
using learner
attainment • Peer Assessment Data •
Sample of Learner’s output Timeliness Follow the
data. (PPST
5.2.2) with reflection/self recommende
assessment d timeline in
• Progress Charts/Anecdotal conduction
Records monitoring
and
• Class/e-class evaluation of
 records/grading sheets learners
• Lesson Plan showing index
progress.
of mastery
• Frequency of errors with
identified least
mastered
skills
• Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
highlights the objective
(e.g. Individual Learning
Achievement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
• Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
7%

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
ce Target
7% Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

Basic 12.Communicat Any one (1) of the Quality

Educati ed promptly following:
on and
Service clearly the • A sample of corrected
s learners’ test paper of learner in
needs, a
progress and learning area with
achievement to parents’ or guardian’s Efficiency
key signature and date of
stakeholders, receipt
including
parents/ • Minutes of meeting with
guardians key stakeholders (e.g.
(PPST 5.4.2)
PTC, SGC, SPT, CPC)
with proof of attendance
• Report card with
parent’s or guardian’s Timeliness Need to
signature in all quarters communicate
supported by minutes of
promptly
the meeting
learners’
• Communication with progress.
stakeholders (e.g.
parents/guardians, co
teacher, LGU) using
various modalities
• Anecdotal record
showing entries per
quarter
• Any equivalent ALS
Form/document that
highlights the objective
• Others (Please specify
and provide
annotations)

13. Applied a 7% A reflection/journal Quality

personal entry that highlights
philosophy of the application of a Timeliness Need to
teaching that is learner-centered apply
personal
philosophy of
teaching that
is learner
 centered
across 4
quarters

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
learner teaching philosophy in Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
centered. the lesson plan or ce Target
(PPST 7.1.2) community work. Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

14. Set 7% 1. Certification form the ICT Quality

professional Coordinator/School Head/
development Focal Person in-charge of e-
goals based SAT 2. IPCRF-DP Efficiency
on the 3. Mid-year Review Form
Philippine (MRF) 4. Updated IPCRF-DP
Professional from Phase II
Timeliness
Standards for
Teachers
(PPST 7.5.2)

Basic 5. Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Educati
• Committee involvement
various related
on works/
Service activities that • Involvement as
s contribute to
the teaching module/learning
learning material writer/validator
process. • Involvement as a Efficiency
resource
person/speaker/learning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/School
initiated TV/Radio
based instruction
Timeliness Need to
 submitted
• Book or journal
MOVs that is
authorship/co
distributed
authorship/contributor
ship across 4
quarters
• Advisorship/coordinator
ship/chairpersonship
• Participation in
demonstration teaching
• Participation as
research presenter in a
forum or conference
• Mentoring or pre
service/in-service
teachers
• Conducted research

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
per KRA Review
within the rating period Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal Results
ce Target
• Others please specify Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
with annotation on how it
contributed to the
teaching learning
process.

Ratee

BEVERLY A. CATIMBANG
 ENGR. SHEILA L. GUEVARA
HUBERTO N. HERMOSO Approving Authority
Head Teacher/Rater