Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Margulis UgariticPsalmR 1970
Margulis UgariticPsalmR 1970
252)
Author(s): B. Margulis
Source: Journal of Biblical Literature , Sep., 1970, Vol. 89, No. 3 (Sep., 1970), pp. 292-304
Published by: The Society of Biblical Literature
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The Society of Biblical Literature is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Journal of Biblical Literature
I. Recto
TEXT
TRANSLATION
NOTES
2 rpu : "(the) Rapha"; cf. II Sam 21 16, 18 (=I Chron 20 4, 6), Ug.
(epithet of the king-hero Danel). For the implications and ove
nificance, cf. Comment 2 below.
6 ytb bcttrt... tpt bhdrcy: Cf. Josh 12 4 where (mutatis mutandis) the
identical "formula" (cf. Deut 1 4; Josh 9 lo, 13 12) occurs and in a con-
8... wydmr bknr ... For the idiomatic parallel in OT Hebrew cf.
Pss 71 22, 98 5, 147 7, 149 3.
9 tlb : a hitherto unidentified instrument. On the basis of the OT evi-
dence - e.g., I Sam 10 5 1nn1 't7n lnl ~:; I Kings 10 12 rnV11
rnv1? t2l' - the choice seems to lie between 5r;n "flute" and :al
"lute," with slight preference to the latter.
15 bhbr :=b "from (out of)"+hbr "barrel, vat" (WUS, no. 896). Cf.
UM 52:76 whbrh mla yn, "and his barrel is full of wine"; Akk. huzburu(m)
-AHw, 352a; CAD, vol. 6, s.v. A possible OT reflex is bet heber (Prov
21 9, 25 24) "tavern" (literally, "house of vat"). There appear to be no
compelling grounds however for assuming with Albright (VTSuppl, 3
[1955/1960], pp. 10-12; The Bible and the Ancient Near East [Anchor
ed.], 482 f.) a connection with Ugaritic (UM Krt 82) bt hbr (=Akk. bit
hiburni, AHw, 344b; cf. however CAD, s.v.) "granary." For the highly
problematic smn sswn mhbryk in Ps 45 8 (RSV: "with oil of gladness
above your fellows") we ought possibly to read smn swsn(m) mhbry (mr)
"oil of lilies/roses from vats (of myrrh)."
I I. Verso
TEXT
6b .. ] rpi mlk lm 4
bcz 7rpi mik ilm +4
bdmrh 8bl[iah]2 +4
bhtkh bnmrth \2
91r[pi] ar7 czk 3
dmrk lOl[i]ak htkk +3
TRANSLATION
NOTES
7 lr[pi]6 ars : Cf. UM 128:111:14 mid rm krt btk rpi ar, whic
2527) renders "... unter den Fiirsten des Landes." The rpum
submitted, are to be seen as an order or brotherhood of knigh
known for their giant physical proportions and under the pa
the mythical-chthonic rpum/Rephaim, themselves a (myt
fraternity of skilled warriors. See further below, Comment 2
12 ncmt snt : Vncm, Heb. t(i)wy (cf. WUS, 1806): cf. Gen 49 15 (// n:).
The precise syntactical relationship depends on whether one sees ncmt
as an abstract noun (WUS, s.v.: Lieblichkeit) or as modifying snt. Re
the latter term, cf. OT ni3v =plural construct, versus Z'W (Ug. snm?) =
plural absolute/rectus, rarely construct (e.g., the fixed idiom .. . .n ,w).
ym-snt, Heb. ;ivW-ns, esp. in their respective plural forms, are a
fixed pair in which Vym is consistently the A-word and V/snt the B-word
(e.g., UT 1019:4-5; Deut 32 7; Ps 77 6, 90 15; Job 10 5. On the termi-
nology A-word/B-word, cf. M. Held, in R. Boling, JSS, 5 (1960),
pp. 223 ff.). This is sufficient to rule out the possibility of snt ( <ysn) =
(Heb.) m;rt "sleep" [Krt:33]) in this context.
13 (Snt) il : "(the years) of El" or "of the god," with decided preference
to the former in view of Canaanite-Hebrew Del colam (cf. supra, I, Recto,
note 3). For it is obvious that the thrust of the imagery here is the idea
of eternity, symbolized by the superannuated head of the pantheon as
well as by the main steller luminaries: cf. Karatepe Inscription, III,
lines 18 f. : bcl smm wl qn 'rs wsms 'lm, and IV, lines 2 f. : sm 'ztwd ykn
lclm km smr -s wyr~. In the OT, cf. Ps 89 37 f. (Eng. 36 f.): "His line shall
endure for ever, his throne as long as the sun before me. Like the moon
it shall be established for ever, eternal as the sky [reading waded kassazaaq]
it shall stand firm."
COMMENT
cubits ... and fierce of face."I3 This passage, whose setting is the vicinity
of the Esdraelon/Jordan valley and which reflects the firsthand expe-
rience of its author, can hardly fail to bring to mind the description of
the Canaanite population by the Israelite reconnaissance as "men of
great stature" (Num 13 33). The Hebrew phrase Danse midd6t recurs,
interestingly enough, in connection with the accounts of single combat
between David's "mighty (men)" and Philistine warriors of giant pro-
portions designated "offspring of the Rapha/rephaim."'4
An examination of the traditions of single combat found in I Sam
17; II Sam 21 15 ff. (=I Chron 20 4 ff.) and 23 8 ff. (=I Chron 11 1 ff.)
shows that the "offspring of the Rapha(im)" are professional warriors
-'isv milhama (I Sam 17); is mddon (II Sam 21 20 [Qere])--who
specialize in single combat (Dis benayy{m [I Sam 17 4]).15 The formularic
designation Dis+P (=military profession) recalls "West Akkadian"
(El-Amarna, Alalakh, Ugarit, etc.) amelu(tu) - variant sdbe- +P used
to denote military types.'6 In the same vein, one notes the Ugaritic
parallelism mtm-gzrm "men-heroes" that occurs in the so-called
Rephaim text (UM 124:6-7) as follows: tm ytbs sm-il mtm // yc(?)bs
brkn sm-il gzrm (4+4), "There do men pay homage (?) to Name-
of-El // (There do) heroes bow (?) the knee to Name-of-El." It is surely
in this manner, moreover, that one must interpret the stock epithet
of Danel mt rpi (Heb. * rn(;1) V'K) which occurs in parallelism with
gzr mt hrnmy.'7
I3 Tr. Wilson, ANET2, pp. 475-79; Gardiner, Egyptian Hieratic Texts I, 1 (1911).
14 I Chron 11 23. The parallel text in II Sam 21 and the corresponding LXX
"read" (Qere) ,Imn v, - cf. also I Chron 12 9 - which is strikingly similar to Pap.
Anas. "fierce of face." The expression "man of stature" occurs in the Chron. passage
specifically in connection with one called ,is misrt, usually rendered "an Egyptian,"
the blandness of which is transparent. One ought perhaps to compare Ug. msry which
occurs alongside mryn and mdrilm, both species of military personnel. (Cf. however
Gr6ndahl, op. cit., p. 161). We note parenthetically that the orthography of rapa in
II Sam 21/23 is best explained (contra Willesen, JSS, 3 (1958), pp. 327-35) in terms
of the well-attested tendency of forms III-aleph to become III-he in "late" OT (and
Middle) Hebrew; e.g., Job 8 21 (/mlP > vmlh); Jer 49 10 (vhb' > vzbh); Siloam Inscr.,
line 4 (vqr' > qrh); and finally, Jer 3 22; Ps 60 4 (vrp: > vrph).
15 Cf. also neartm (II Sam 2 14 ff.) =Pap. Anas. I (xvii, 3-4) nearin.
x6 Knudtzon, Die El-Amarna Tafeln (1915), 49 (Glossary no. 1371); Wiseman,
The Alalakh Tablets (1955), 134f., 138; O'Callaghan, in JFK, 1 (1951), 320. Note-
worthy in this connection is Rabin's suggestion (Eretz Israel 8, pp. 251 f.) that the
term Og is actually a titular meaning "man".
17 One notes parenthetically the possibility that EA amelutu/Sabe bilatu may be a
literal translation of Canaanite mt(m) rpi(m) in view of Akk. vblt which in the D-
formation means "heal, make well" (AHw, 99), Canaanite vrp'.
26 Archaeology and the Religion of Israel (1946), p. 218. Cf. also Farnell, Greek Hero
Cults (1920/1), pp. 15-18.
27 Cf. Kraeling, JNES, 6 (1947), pp. 193-208; and my paper in Tarbiz (1969/70),
where I have suggested that Gen 6 1-4, as a theomachy account, be viewed as a mytho-
logical etiology of the Rephaim-Anaqim tradition.
28 Stein, Der Begriff Kebod Jahwe (1939); von Rad, Studies in Deuteronomy (1948/
1953), pp. 37-44; Theology of the OT (1957/1962), pp. 239-41. The merit of Stein's
work lies principally in the collection and classification of the material; that of von Rad
in the application of form-critical method. See also Weinfeld, Tarbiz, 37 (1967/8),
pp. 116-20, 131 f.
point, one could only surmise that the doctrine was "in no wi
creation of the Priestly Document but only the reintroduc
very old sacral tradition."29 The question of the doctrine'
historical background and origin could be raised as a prog
challenge only;30 the question of possible extrabiblical cultura
seems never to have been put, much less answered.
In 1969 the present writer completed a study of Psalm 29,
it was argued that the leitmotif of this biblical composition i
or gravitas of Yahweh in the form of a storm cloud, and that
(kultischen) leben of this text was the ritual enthronement of
in the Jerusalem temple.3' The key passage on which this the
was vs. 10, a verse whose true meaning and significance had b
flaged by a faulty masoretic text division. However, once
structure of the poem came into focus, it was obvious that th
reading was approximately as follows:
Jerusalem cultus, the nature of which could now be defined with some
precision in terms of the divine enthronement construct vigorously
propounded and defended by Mowinckel for half a century but which
had yet to be demonstrated as necessary. The theory of kdb6d en-
thronement, on the other hand, seemed all but immune to the otherwise
formidable arguments leveled at Mowinckel's theory.34
The almost simultaneous appearance of the new (RS 24) Ugaritic
texts35 provided what seemed to be immediate confirmation of this
form-critical thesis while pointing unmistakably to the solution of the
cultural-historical aspect of the problem. To be sure, the formative
role of the pre-Davidic Jerusalem cultus on Israelite kingship and en-
thronement theology had not been entirely overlooked;36 the Ugaritic
testimony to El's kingship had, after all, redrawn attention and im-
parted new credibility to the OT evidence for El-worship in the Jebusite
city-state (Gen 14). But there existed hitherto no unambiguous evidence
to connect Canaanite kingship ideology with Israelite cultic practice,
nor any indication of a Canaanite blend of enthronement and kabod
themes.37
The new evidence for the ritual enthronement (i.e., enthroned
presence within a ritual setting) of the yqr El/kebod Yahweh is thus of
major significance. It may be seen as the linchpin of both Canaanite
and Israelite divine kingship ( = K6nigtum Gottes) ideology and practice,
binding the mythic with the ritual and the Canaanite with the Israelite
on the phenomenological and historical planes respectively.
34 Cf., e.g., Kraus, Gottesdienst in Israel (21962), pp. 239-41; de Vaux, Ancient
Israel (1958/1961), pp. 504-06. Be it noted, however, that some of the arguments
- especially the one based on a being-becoming antithesis (e.g., Johnson, Sacral Kingship
[1955], pp. 54 ff.) - were decisively countered by Mowinckel himself: cf., e.g., PsIs
Worship, II, pp. 222 ff.
It is possibly significant that neither Ps 29 nor the concept of the kabod Yahweh
seems to have figured prominently in Mowinckel's argumentation.
35 Despite a title-page dated 1968, Ugaritica V does not seem to have appeared
publicly before calendar year 1969. The text in question did not come to my attention
until early August 1969 on the occasion of Prof. Loewenstamm's lecture at the Fifth
World Congress of Jewish Studies (Jerusalem).
36 On Israelite kingship generally, cf. the writings of A. R. Johnson (e.g., Sacral
Kingship); on the divine enthronement proper, see Mowinckel, Psis Worship, I, p. 114.
37 There did exist however some overlooked evidence for a Canaanite sem-
theology, e.g., UM 124:6-7 (cf. supra, Comment 2); Ug. PN's smbcl, Smcnt (Gronda
op. cit., pp. 193 f.).