Scott Vs Desantis Application 11th Circuit

USCA11 Case: 23-13411 Document: 1-2 Date Filed: 10/17/2023 Page: 1 of 982
1 of 982
Christine Scott
212 E. Hillsboro Blvd #212
Deerfield Beach, FL 33441
misschristinescott@hotmail.com
682-230-2002
Aug. 17, 2023
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas

United States Supreme Courthouse
1 First Street NE
Washington, D.C. 20543d
RE: Emergency Application Regarding Election Fraud Affecting National
Security (Brought under United State Supreme Court Rules 111 and 222 Federal
Court of Appeals Rule 23, and 11th Circuit Rule 2-1.
To the Honorable Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the
United States and Circuit Justice for the United States Court of Appeals for the
Eleventh Circuit:
Petitioner, pro se litigant4, Christine Scott (herein known as ‘Scott’) seeks an order
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2101(e), Rules 11 and 22 of the United States Supreme
Court, Rule 2 of the United States Court of Appeals, and Rule 2-1 of the 11th Circuit
to set aside the 2022 General Election and holding it anew. The Leon County
Circuit Court, assisted by the Clerk, have conspired with the First District Court of
Appeals to block the case from moving forward, which is why Scott cannot take
the traditional route to arrive at the Supreme Court.

1 Enclosed a1: United States Supreme Court: Rule 11
2 Enclosed b1: United States Supreme Court: Rule 22
3 Enclosed c1: Federal Court of Appeals: RULE 2 and 11th Circuit Rule 2-1
4 Memorandum of Law Relating to Pro Se Litigant
2 of 982
This case is based on an election plagued by over 3B statutory violations of fraud,
by state and county official, where the election machines were either not certified,
certifiable or both, where the State’s official records claim no registered voter
from any party voted, and where candidates certified their own races. This
misconduct, fraud and corruption took place in all of Florida’s 67 counties. After
having moved that the judge disqualify himself5 due to a repeated and blatant
refusal to follow the governing statute, Fla. Stat. 102.168: Contest of Election,
which supersedes any court rules of procedure, and which was put in place to
ensure election cases could move swiftly through the court system, on May 17,
2023, Scott added necessarily added him.
The State of Florida and our country is currently under attack by both foreign and
domestic entities which seek to destroy her on many levels, including but not
limited through abuse of the election process, which has been completely
overtaken, in Florida, amounting to no less than a coup by traitors from within
working with foreign enemies, showing that the case is of such imperative public
importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require
immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U.S.C. s. 2101(e) and Rule 11:
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals Before Judgment.
5 Enclosure d1: J. Lee Marsh added to Contest of Election for aiding Defendants in
acts of RICO and Treason
3 of 982
To ensure this court can seamlessly move forward in its review of this case which
addresses matters of state, ultimately affecting national security, and because the
United States Supreme Court is the highest appellate court in the land and
capable of hearing the matter without pressure from politicians or other outside
influences, Scott requests this court implement FRAP 2. Suspension of Rules which
states, “On its own or a party’s motion, a court of appeals may – to expedite its
decision or for other good cause – suspend any provision of these rules in a
particular case and order proceedings as it directs…’ and as is described in the
11th Cir. R. 2-1 Court Action, which states that ‘(i)n lieu of the procedures
described in the Eleventh Circuit Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, the
court may take such other or different action as it deems appropriate.’ To avoid a
successful coup and overthrow of both the Florida and national government it is
imperative that Justice Thomas review this case which has been caged in and
blocked from being hear or moving to a higher court, by the Leon County Circuit
Court, as well as the Clerks and Chief Justice of the First District Court of Florida.
The case is open in the Leon County Circuit Court, the Chief Judge went so far as
to assign a new judge, but the clerks have refused to show that the case is open,
on the docket, and everyone in the judiciary appears to be pretending the case is
closed. It looks like the strategy is to stall until after the 2024 election cycle and
then to call the case moot. Scott has the right to a fair trial. She has the right to
have evidence heard in the case. Her evidence is solid and, if heard, she will win
4 of 982
the case and the People of Florida will rightfully be able to have a new election.
Each Floridian has the right to have their vote counted, yet none were.
Scott is writing to submit this Emergency Application to the Eleventh Circuit of the
United States Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, in her capacity as the
plaintiff6, in the case of Scott v. DeSantis7, in the Leon County Circuit Court, in
Florida8. Scott understands the Court’s obligation and commitment to uphold
justice and safeguard her right to a fair and honest election, as well as the rights
of all Floridians, and more broadly all Americans, humbly seeking intervention in a
matter of great urgency.
In light of the urgency and importance of this matter, Scott respectfully requests
that the Court consider this emergency application. The evidence provided within
demonstrates a clear violation of Scott’s constitutional right to due process, to a
fair and honest election the right to a secure nation and the immediate threat to
our national security, as well as this matter being of public interest, which has led
to a current and ongoing attempted coup to overthrow local, state and federal
government, with the goal being to remove Scott’s sovereign rights, as well as
those of Americans, who have not lost such rights due to becoming an enemy of
6 Concerned party = (1) American with constitutional right to fair and honest
elections, (2) registered voter in the State of Florida during the 2020 and 2022
election cycles, (3) taxpayer in the State of Florida, (4) Petitioner in Case
#2022CA2105.
7 Case #2022CA2105
8 which was unlawfully dismissed before heard on May 18, 2023, in violation of
my constitutional right to a fair trial
5 of 982
the state and/or aiding foreign nationals in this malicious, ongoing attempt to
overthrow the Florida and US government by way of election fraud, both
throughout the State of Florida and throughout the entire country by way of
compromised electronic election equipment9, compromised government officials,
employees, contractors and agents. The ramifications of these violations are far-
reaching and demand prompt judicial review.
In light of the urgency and importance of this matter, Scott respectfully requests
that the Honorable Thomas Clarence, or, if he prefer, the whole of the United
States Supreme Court, consider her emergency application. Scott firmly believes
that her case meets the criteria, as described in detail below.
The urgency of the situation, the imminent danger for the State of Florida and the
United States of America10, the public interest and the critical constitutional issues
at stake necessitate immediate attention from this Honorable Court due to
significant interference with the election process, in the 2022 election cycle11,
which has put this country’s sovereignty in peril. As an American citizen registered
9 Both certified and uncertified for use in the State of Florida
10 Which belongs to the American people, and was never a corporate entity due
to the mere fact that no government official had the legal right to turn our
country over to any other group, entity, state or sovereign and in attempting to
do so committed an act of treason against the American people. The
government may not act without the permission of the people. To relinquish
control or ownership of the country, or any state, would have necessitated
permission by way of a constitutional amendment by the American populace,
which was never granted.
11 As well as in the 2020 election cycle, which is briefly addressed in this
application. Upon request, further evidence of 2020 election fraud as it related
to election equipment can be supplied.
6 of 982
to vote in Florida’s Broward County, Scott has a right12 and a duty13 to bring this
crisis to the attention of the highest court in the land to ensure enemies of the
state do not win this war currently being launched against our fine country. In a
similar respect, this honorable court has an absolute and immediate duty to
address this matter to protect our country from enemy nations wishing to destroy
us. Again, it is Scott’s right to address this matter which personally affects her,
and every other American in the State of Florida, and ultimately, the entire
country, just as it is the duty of this court to address this imminent danger so that
our country and sovereigns14 survive this unconventional attack of war.
I. Introduction and Background
On Dec. 1, 2022, Scott filed a Contest of Election, in Florida’s Leon County Circuit
Court15, which addresses misconduct, fraud and corruption16 relating to the 2022
12 FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 2. Electors. — Only a citizen of
the United States who is at least eighteen years of age and who is a permanent
resident of the state, if registered as provided by law, shall be an elector of the
county where registered.
13 FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE 6, SECTION 3. Oath. —Each eligible citizen
upon registering shall subscribe the following: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm)
that I will protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and the
Constitution of the State of Florida, and that I am qualified to register as an
elector under the Constitution and laws of the State of Florida.”
14 We the People
15 See Fla. Stat. 102.168: Contest of Election
16 See Fla. Stat. 102.168(3): The grounds for contesting an election under this
section are: (a) Misconduct, fraud, or corruption on the part of any election
official or any member of the canvassing board sufficient to change or place in
doubt the result of the election. (b) Ineligibility of the successful candidate for
the nomination or office in dispute. (c) Receipt of a number of illegal votes or
rejection of a number of legal votes sufficient to change or place in doubt the
result of the election. (d) Proof that any elector, election official, or canvassing
board member was given or offered a bribe or reward in money, property, or
any other thing of value for the purpose of procuring the successful candidate’s
7 of 982
General Election cycle. On May 17, 2023, Scott necessarily added J. Lee Marsh 17,
the then-presiding judge, as a defendant in the case18, for entering the arena19,
advocating for the defendants20, violating several Florida statutes, as well as
Scott’s constitutional right to due process21, a fair trial22 and an impartial judge23.
nomination or election or determining the result on any question submitted by

referendum.
17 See Enclosure d1: J. Lee Marsh added to Contest of Election for aiding
Defendants in acts of RICO and Treason
18 WHEREAS, officials and even judges have no immunity (See, Owen vs. City of
Independence, 100 S Ct. 1398; Maine vs. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502; and Hafer
vs. Melo, 502 U.S. 21; officials and judges are deemed to know the law and
sworn to uphold the law; officials and judges cannot claim to act in good faith
in willful deprivation of law, they certainly cannot plead ignorance of the law,
even the Citizen cannot plead ignorance of the law, the courts have ruled there
is no such thing as ignorance of the law, it is ludicrous for learned officials and
judges to plead ignorance of the law therefore there is no immunity, judicial or
otherwise, in matters of rights secured by the Constitution for the United States
of America. See: Title 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. "When lawsuits are brought against
federal officials, they must be brought against them in their "individual"
capacity not their official capacity. When federal officials perpetrate
constitutional torts, they do so ultra vires (beyond the powers) and lose the
shield of immunity." U.S. v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 (1878)
19 Once a judge enters the arena with the moving party, the judge has assumed
the posture of an adversary and is disqualified from conducting further
proceedings. See Stewart v. Douglas, 597 So. 2D 381 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
20 Disqualification under Canon 3E(1) does not require actual bias or actual
prejudice, but “whenever the judge’s impartiality might be reasonably
questioned.”
21 Due Process: The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one
shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law." The
Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, uses the same eleven words, called
the Due Process Clause, to describe a legal obligation of all states. These words
have as their central promise an assurance that all levels of American
government must operate within the law ("legality") and provide fair
procedures. Source: Cornell Law School, Legal Information Institute.
Law.cornell.edu/wex/due_process
22 One of the hallmarks of the American judicial system is that every litigant is
entitled to “[a] fair trial in a fair tribunal.” In re Murchinson, 349 US 133, 136
8 of 982
Fla. Stat. 38.01: Every judge of this state who appears of record as a party
to any cause before him or her shall be disqualified to act therein,...Any and
all attempted judicial acts by any judge so disqualified in a cause, whether
done inadvertently or otherwise, shall be utterly null and void and of no
effect.
It is the duty of all officials whether legislative, judicial, executive,

administrative, or ministerial to so perform every official act as not to
violate constitutional provisions. Williamson v. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 815 F.2d. 369, ACLU Foundation v. Barr, 952 F.2d. 457, 293 U.S.
App. DC 101, (CA DC 1991)
Due to Judge Marsh’s newly acquired status as a defendant, he was without
jurisdiction24 to rule in the case, and in such, in violation of his oath25 to uphold the
constitution once he attempted to order that the case be dismissed before heard,
the latter of which violates Fla. Stat. 102.168(5), which was specifically written to
(1955)
23 See Enclosure d1: J. Lee Marsh added to Contest of Election for aiding
Defendants in acts of RICO and Treason
24 Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the
judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216,
101 S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6
Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)
25 Fla. Stat. 876.05 contains the state oath which states in relevant part that ‘a
recipient of public funds’ ‘solemnly swear(s) or affirms(s) that (he/she) will
support the Constitution of the United States and of the State of Florida’; and in
accordance with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court, any judge
who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars
against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of
the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has
stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against
the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re
Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S.200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L.
Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed
257 (1821). Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
9 of 982
prevent judges from dismissing election cases before heard26,necessarily voiding27
the order for violating the presiding statute under which the case was filed.
See Fla. Stat. 102.168(5) – A statement of the grounds of contest may not
be rejected, nor the proceedings dismissed, by the court for any want
of form if the grounds of contest provided in the statement are sufficient to
clearly inform the defendant of the particular proceeding or cause for which
the nomination or election is contested.
The orders filed and signed on May 19, 2023, by then-Defendant Marsh, to dismiss
the case28 and declare Scott to be a vexatious litigant29, are nullified because a
judge cannot preside over a case to which he is a party30, nor can he create a
legally binding order at that stage of litigation.
26 In addition, A court should not dismiss a complaint “unless it appears beyond

doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claims which
would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. Gobson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957)
27 A void judgment or decree is regarded as a nullity. Caudell v. Leventis, 43 So.
2d 853 (Fla. 1950) A void judgment or decree is regarded as a nullity. Caudell v.
Leventis, 43 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1950)
28 Enclosure e1: See Enclosure d1: J. Lee Marsh added to Contest of Election for
aiding Defendants in acts of RICO and Treason
29 Enclosure f1: See Enclosure d1: J. Lee Marsh added to Contest of Election for
aiding Defendants in acts of RICO and Treason... the right to file a lawsuit pro
se is one of the most important rights under the constitution and laws." Elmore
v. McCammon (1986) 640 F. Supp. 905
30 To ensure a fair trial, the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the
Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause will, in some circumstances,
require the disqualification of the judge. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Lavoi, 475 U.S.
813, 820-822 (1986)
10 of 982
Scott’s case was not dismissed for any want of form but rather during an
unconstitutional hearing31, held in violation of Fla. Stat 102.168(6)32, which voids
any and all judicial acts during said hearing for lack of jurisdiction. Yet, after being
added to the case for repeatedly violating the United States and Florida
Constitutions, as well as multiple Florida statutes33 (as described in detail within
31 An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties;

affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as
inoperative as though it had never been passed. Norton v. Shelby County, 118
U.S. 425 p. 442 (1866)
32 Fla. Stat. 102.168(6): A copy of the complaint shall be served upon the
defendant and any other person named therein in the same manner as in other
civil cases under the laws of this state. Within 10 days after the complaint has
been served, the defendant must file an answer admitting or denying the
allegations on which the contestant relies or stating that the defendant has no
knowledge or information concerning the allegations, which shall be deemed a
denial of the allegations, and must state any other defenses, in law or fact, on
which the defendant relies. If an answer is not filed within the time prescribed,
the defendant may not be granted a hearing in court to assert any claim or
objection that is required by this subsection to be stated in an answer.
33 ... the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms
and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written
constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts,
as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument." "In declaring
what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first
mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only
which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution, have that rank". "All law
(rules and practices) which are repugnant to the Constitution are VOID". Since
the 14th Amendment to the Constitution states "NO State (Jurisdiction) shall
make or enforce any law which shall abridge the rights, privileges, or
immunities of citizens of the United States nor deprive any citizens of life,
liberty, or property, without due process of law, ... or equal protection under
the law", this renders judicial immunity unconstitutional. Marbury v. Madison, 5
U.S. (2 Cranch) 137, 180 (1803); Under Federal law which is applicable to all
states, the U.S. Supreme Court stated that if a court is "without authority, its
judgments and orders are regarded as nullities. They are not voidable, but
simply void; and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior to a reversal in
opposition to them. They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned
in executing such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as
trespassers." Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)
11 of 982
this application) and repeatedly refusing to disqualify himself34 upon receipt of
three separate legally sufficient motions, the then-presiding judge again violated
Florida’s Election Code35 by attempting to dismiss the case before heard36 and,
without jurisdiction or a proper hearing37, maliciously and in retaliation against
Scott, ruled her to be a vexatious litigant in an attempt to ensure Scott, an
indigent litigant, could no longer represent herself, while knowing she could not
afford an attorney; essentially attempting to block her contest of election - even
though then-defendant Marsh did not have jurisdiction in the case at that point38
and while having knowledge that any judicial action heard on May 18, 2023 was
mandatorily void.
Florida’s Contest of Election statute forbids hearings to be granted for objections,
defenses or claims by defendants, if they failed to file an Answer within 10 days of
being served the complaint. All objections, defenses and claims must be ‘in an
answer’ ‘to be granted a hearing’, per Fla. Stat. 102.168(6). The motions ruled on
by then-Defendant Marsh, on May 18, 2023, were not authorized to be heard
34 Enclosure d1: Motions, Objections and Denials to Disqualify Judge Marsh

35 Florida Statute 102.168(5): Contest of Election. ‘A statement of the grounds of
contest may not be rejected, nor the proceedings dismissed, by the court for
any want of form if the grounds of contest provided in the statement are
sufficient to clearly inform the defendant of the particular proceeding or cause
for which the nomination or election is contested.’; ‘It is ethical responsibility of
all judges to know the law and to faithfully follow it.’ Garcia v. Manning, 717 So.
2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
36 See Fla. Stat. 102.168(5)
37 It is ethical responsibility of all judges to know the law and to faithfully follow it.
Garcia v. Manning, 717 So. 2D 59 (Fla. 3D DCA 1998)
38 Judge not only must be free of evil intent but he must also avoid appearance of
evil. Aetna Life & Cas. Co v. Thorn, 319 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
12 of 982
because 1) Attorney Schrieber filed an answer on behalf of Governor DeSantis,
Attorney General Moody and Chief Financial Officer Patronis who had requested
the hearing had filed an answer 13 days after having been served the the
complaint; 2) Attorney Ashley Davis who had no authority to represent Secretary
of State Byrd nor Director of Elections for the Division of Elections Matthews (a
duty belongs to the Attorney General39), because Davis filed an Motion to Dismiss
outside the answer, which does not comply with the presiding statutory
requirements as laid out in Fla. Stat. 102.168(6).
Fla. Stat. 102.168(6): A copy of the complaint shall be served upon the
defendant and any other person named therein in the same manner as in
other civil cases under the laws of this state. Within 10 days after the
complaint has been served, the defendant must file an answer admitting or
denying the allegations on which the contestant relies or stating that the
defendant has no knowledge or information concerning the allegations,
which shall be deemed a denial of the allegations, and must state any other
defenses, in law or fact, on which the defendant relies. If an answer is not
filed within the time prescribed, the defendant may not be granted a
hearing in court to assert any claim or objection that is required by this
subsection to be stated in an answer.
Due to the fact that:
1) neither motion was authorized to be heard because:
a) Secretary of State Byrd and Division of Elections Director of
Elections Matthews’ motion to dismiss was not filed ‘in an answer’,
which violated the mandate in Fla. Stat. 102.168(6), which means
they could not be granted a hearing for any objection, claim or
39 Enclosure g1: 1) Florida statute relating to attorney general’s duties; 2) Fla.

Stat. 111.07: defense of civil actions against public officers, employees, or
agents; 3) Fla. Stat. 768.28(9)(a)
13 of 982
defense. A motion to remove Scott’s right to defend herself is a
motion stating a defense, claim and/or objection which was beyond
the authority of defendants Byrd and Matthews and the jurisdiction of
the court,
b) none of the three attorneys representing Byrd or Matthews (McVay,
Davis and Chappell) were authorized to represent state defendant,
since Florida’s Constitution assigned that duty to the Attorney
General, as is reaffirmed under the Attorney General’s duties (see Fla.
Stat. 16.01(4-5)40 which means the state funds they accepted for such
representation were received through embezzlement, which violates
Fla. Stat. 812.014, subsequently voiding the Byrd and Matthew’s
motion under the doctrine of unclean hands.
c) Byrd and Matthews motion falsely accusing Scott of being a
vexatious litigant was brought forth by Ashley Davis, an attorney
without legal authority to represent state defendants, and in such was
an impostor who had embezzled funds to represent SOS Byrd and DOE
Director Matthews making the motion and hearing void and leaving
40 Fla. Stat. 16.01(4): Shall appear in and attend to, in behalf of the state, all
suites or prosecutions, civil or criminal or in equity, in which the state may be a
party, or in anywise interested, in the Supreme Court and district courts of
appeal of this state. (5) Shall appear in and attend to such suits or prosecutions
in any other of the courts of this state...
14 of 982
the judge (even if Judge Marsh had still had jurisdiction in the case,
which he did not) without authority or jurisdiction to hear the motion,
d) the Doctrine of Unclean Hands forbids the motion brought forth by
Byrd and Matthews from being heard due to the fact that their motion
violates Fla. Stat. 102.168(6) and was brought forth by attorneys
without the ability to represent state defendants; and
2) there was no legally presiding judge assigned to the case at the time of
the unauthorized hearing,
a) Judge Marsh was without jurisdiction to hear the motions due to his status
as a defendant in the case regardless of whether or not he had filed an
order disqualifying himself.
b) Fla. Stat. 38.01 states that due to a judge’s status as a defendant, he is
disqualified from presiding over the case. The statute does not base the
disqualification on a written order by the judge, but rather on the fact that
the judge had become a party in the case. Scott had no reason to attend,
and therefore, did not attend the sham and unauthorized hearing on May
18, 2023. She had no obligation – and arguably no right due to the illegality
of the hearing, in general - to appear for, or participate in, a hearing that
operated in violation of the law.
15 of 982
Florida’s judiciary is simply too corrupt to be trusted to conduct a fair hearing
related to election fraud when the governor, attorney general, circuit judges,
district court judges, Florida supreme court justices, clerks, all 67 supervisors of
elections, county commissioners and legislators have been ‘selected’ rather than
‘elected’ and if they want to be ‘selected’ again would presumably be obligated
do whatever the controlling puppet masters dictate, in their position, to ensure
the election fraud remains intact, making it impossible to obtain a fair trail
relating to a Contest of Election, in the State of Florida, and therefore it is
necessary to for this Court to hear the case, due to the case being an emergency,
of public importance and matter of national security.
II. Facts
1. In accordance with Florida’s Division of Elections (DOE) official precinct-level
election results41, no registered voters voted in any race, whether
Republican, Democrat or any other party, in Florida42, during the 2022
General Election cycle, in any of her sixty-seven counties43 (see Fla. Stat.
98.0981(1)(a),(b)(6),(d)1.b-g, 4,(2)(c)1-3,(4),(5));
41 Enclosure 1: Precinct-Level Election Results: Data Definition and Field Codes

Columns 9-11
42 Which means that none of Florida’s 14M+ registered voters voted during the
2022 General Election cycle, in contradiction to a manual count of votes cast in
each county, based on supplied totals from each of Florida’s 67 Supervisors of
Elections official results, totaling 7,795,893 votes cast statewide.
43 Enclosure 2: Official Results for 2022 General Election - Sample of No
Registered Voters in Any County Throughout State of Florida
16 of 982
2. The DOE’s official findings claim that no one voted in eight counties during
in the 2022 Primary election44;
3. Secretary of State (SOS) Cord Byrd did not perform his duty to secure
Florida’s elections or ‘conduct preliminary investigations into any
irregularities or fraud involving...voting…’45 which Scott addressed in
emails46 and lawsuits47, and which Byrd acknowledged were part of his
duties, during the recorded Jan. 18, 2023, Florida House of Representatives’
House Ethics, Elections and Open Government Subcommittee meeting 48;
4. Governor Ron DeSantis, Attorney General Ashley Moody and Chief Financial
Officer Jimmy Patronis influenced the 2022 election cycle49 which benefitted
themselves50 by certifying their own races, instead of passing the baton to

44 Enclosure 3: Official Results for the 2022 Primary Election Sample of No
Registered Voters in Nine Florida Counties
45 See Fla. Stat. 97.012(15) Secretary of State as chief election officer’s duties:
Conduct preliminary investigations into any irregularities or fraud
involving...voting...
46 Enclosure 4: Emails To Or Copied To Secretary Of State, Cord Byrd, Addressing
Fraud In Florida’s 2020 & 2022 Election Cycles
47 Florida Circuit Court, Leon County – 2022 General Election: Case #2022CA2105
(Contest of Election, per Fla. Stat. 102.168); 2022 Primary Election: Case
#2022CA1548 (Contest of Election, per Fla. Stat. 102.168); and 2020 General
Election: Case #2020CA2117 (Contest of Election, per Fla. Stat. 102.168)
48 See Myfloridahouse.gov/VideoPlayer.aspx?eventID=8250 at 4m20s
49 See Fla. Stat. 104.31 Political Activities of State, County, and Municipal Officers
and Employees. - (1) No officer or employee of the state...shall (a) Use his or
her official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with an election
or a nomination of office...or affecting the result thereof.
50 See Fla. Stat. 112.313(6): Misuse of Public Position ‘No officer, employee of an
agency, or local government attorney shall corruptly use...his or her
position...or perform his or her duties, to secure a...benefit...for
himself, herself, or others.’, Fla. Stat. 104.31: Political Activities of
State...officers (1) No officer...of the state...shall: (a) Use his or her official
authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with an election...or
coercing or influencing another person’s vote or affecting the result thereof.
17 of 982
officials who were not on the 2022 ballot51 and in such without a conflict of
interest52;
5. Palm Beach and Lee counties coerced voters to vote on ADA devices
instead of on paper ballots even though Florida is a paper ballot state in an
effort to hide the swapping out of ballots within the electronic53; when Scott
requested the public records identifying how many voters voted on ADA
machines, per Fla. Const. Art. 1, s. 24, she was denied the record access.
Scott was told by several voters and poll watchers in Lee and Palm Beach
County, that voters were told they had to vote on the devices. Only under
adamant demand did was anyone allowed to vote on paper ballots. When
Scott asked Maria Matthews how many counties used ADA devices instead
of paper ballots, she said that Florida’s Division of Elections did not keep
track of that data. SOS Byrd claims Florida is a paper ballot state.
51 See Fla. Stat. 102.111: Election Canvassing Commission (1) ‘The Election
Canvassing Commission shall consist of the Governor and two members of the
Cabinet selected by the Governor, all of whom shall serve ex officio. If a
member of the commission is unable to serve for any reason, the Governor
shall appoint a remaining member of the Cabinet. If there is a further vacancy,
the remaining members of the commission shall agree on another elected
official to fill the vacancy.’
52 Fla. Stat. 112.311(1) “It is essential to the proper conduct and operation of
government that public officials be independent and impartial and that public
office not be used for private gain other than the remuneration provided by
law. The public interest, therefore, requires that the law protect against any
conflict of interest and establish standards for the conduct of elected officials
and government employees in situations where conflicts may exist”; Fla. Stat.
112.312(8) ‘“Conflict” or “conflict of interest” means a situation in which regard
for a private interest tends to lead to disregard of a public duty or interest.’
53 Enclosure 4a: Emails Relating to Exclusive ADA Machine Use in Lee & Palm
Beach Counties during the 2022 Election Cycle
18 of 982
6. Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Wendy Sartory Link’s election
workers unsealed the Primary Election Day (ED) ballot boxes, took out and
replaced the ballots and log sheets to match the county’s altered results,
which affected the integrity General Election ballot54;
7. Broward County’s official 2022 General Election results log ten-percent
(10.01%) of ballots cast as blank55;
8. Official summary results show 78,106,957 million dashes instead of whole
numbers within candidate races or ballot types totaling over 29 votes,
which violates Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a)56;
9. Official precinct-level results show 75,482,035 million dashes instead of
whole numbers within candidate races or ballot types totaling over 29
votes, which violates Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a)57;
10. Based on the combined Summary and Precinct-Level official results,
during the 2022 General Election cycle, there were a total of 153,588,992
54 Enclosure 5: Images of Election Day Boxes Being Unsealed, Ballots Being

Removed and Replaced, Log Sheets in Hand, Boxes Resealed and Put on
Shelves in Warehouse
55 Enclosure 6: 10% (60K) of Broward County’s Ballots Were Blank During the
2022 General Election Cycle
56 Enclosure 7: Itemized report of violations of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a) of
summary results for all 67 counties and a sample of official county summary
results showing dashes instead of whole numbers within candidate races or
ballot types totaling over 29 votes,or conc
57 Enclosure 8: Itemized report of violations of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a) of precinct-
level results for all 67 counties and a sample of official county precinct-level
results showing dashes instead of whole numbers within candidate races or
ballot types totaling over 29
19 of 982
violations of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a), combined throughout Florida’s 67
counties58;
11. 11 Florida counties took funds from that originated from Mark
Zuckerberg and Chinese citizen Priscilla Chan59, by way of two front
companies60, and signed contracts that ultimately relinquished power to
Mark Zuckerberg and china, which is treason, fraud, invalidates the election
in those 11 counties because 1) the funds were at least partially derived
from an enemy of the state, Priscilla Chan, due to her status as a Chinese
citizen and China’s active war doctrine claiming to be at war against the
United States through the use of unconventional and irregular warfare,
including but not limited to election interference; 2) used some of the
illegal funds after the state had outlawed the acceptance of such funds 61,
58 Enclosure 9: Spreadsheet documenting the combined summary and precinct-
level results in violations of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a)
59 Addressing the very real fact that China forces Chinese citizens who live in
America to act on behalf of the Chinese government, is a necessity. It is not a
phobia, as many scream to hide this very dangerous fact, but rather a
necessity of the reality of the situation. We many not allow our enemies to use
their citizens who live within the United States as a way to overthrow the
United States and/or Florida. In such, reality must be addressed that the
Chinese government, often, but not always, under threat, uses Chinese citizens
living in the US in militaristic actions – including but not limited to
unconventional and irregular warfare – against America.
60 The first front company Zuckerberg and Chan used to funnel money into both
the 2020 and 2022 election cycles, in the State of Florida, to influence,
manipulate and change the vote, was the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative; the
second was the Center for Tech and Civic Life. The purpose was to hide the
source of the money, otherwise, Zuckerberg and Chan would have donated the
funds directly. The plan was to use the money to manipulate the election to
ensure the candidates they wanted in office won the elections, which was done
by way of misconduct, fraud and manipulation.
61 Enclosure 10: Alachua County Board of Commissioners Acceptance and
Transfer of Illegal Funds (Zuckerbucks) to Alachua County Supervisor of
20 of 982
per Fla. Stat. 97.0291; and 3) never had the authority to receive funds from
a source other than from the State of Florida, dispersed by the county, to
the Supervisor of Elections duties as described in Fla. Stat. 98.015, 129.101
and 129.102.
12. 35 Florida counties used uncertified Clear Ballot auditing products,
which disclose vote totals real time and are connected directly to computers
which are connected to wifi62;
13. 49 counties used ES&S equipment during the 2020 and 2022 election
cycles that were not federally certified due to built-in modem
vulnerabilities, and in such, could not be used at a state level since the
state accepted federal election funds, nor could the election be certified
due to the doubt created by using uncertifiable equipment63;
14. 18 Florida counties64 allowed for foreign interference in their 2020 and
2022 election cycles by using foreign-owned Dominion products 65 which are
largely or exclusively made in China66;
Elections 2022 Budget

62 Enclosure 11: 26 Florida Counties Illegally Used Clear Ballot Auditing Products
Which Are Not Certified for Use in the State of Florida
63 Enclosure 12: 49 Federally Uncertified ES&S Machines Were Illegally Used in
the 2020 & 2022 Election Cycles
64 Enclosure 13: 18 Florida Counties That Used Chinese-Owned Dominion
Equipment During the 2020 & 2022 Election Cycles
65 Enclosure 14: Dominion Voting Systems, Inc is Foreign-Owned, Partially by
Enemy of the State, China
66 Enclosure 15: Substantial Foreign Interference With Florida Elections by Enemy
State, China, Which Unlawfully Acted as a Contractor by Contracting Dominion
Equipment to the State of Florida (Show China’s War Doctrine Against the US)
21 of 982
15. (REMOVE – USE AS AN ARGUMENT or as an example... ADDRESSING
RAMPANT FRAUD) Hillsborough County’s Supervisor of Elections, Craig
Latimer used dashes instead of whole numbers to represent votes, during
the 2022 election cycle, to hide altered totals, in violation of Fla. Stat.
98.0981(2)(a)67;
16. all 67 Supervisors of Elections have joined the Florida Supervisors of
Elections, Inc., which is a lobbying organization acting in violation of the
best interest of Florida residents and voters, the Sunshine Act, and the IRS’s
501(c)(3) Mandate68;
17. and on and on...
III. ARGUMENT
A. DOE: ACCORDING TO THE DIVISION OF ELECTION’S 2022 GENERAL

ELECTION PRECINCT-LEVEL OFFICIAL RESULTS NO REGISTERED
REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS OR OTHERS69 VOTED IN ANY OF
FLORIDA’S 67 COUNTIES, ACCUMULATIVELY CREATING
According to the Division of Elections Official Results for the 2022 General Election
cycle, no registered Republicans, Democrats or others (see Enclosure 1: Columns
9-11) voted in any race. 7,795,893 ballots were cast at a precinct-level throughout
the Florida’s 67 counties, but not a single registered Republican, Democrat, or
67 Enclosure 16: Example of Hillsborough County Altered Ballot Totals Which Were
Concealed in Violation of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a)
68 Enclosure 17: FSE Membership; FSE Officers; FSE Board Members
69 ‘All Other Parties’
22 of 982
Other voted in any candidate race or referendum, resulting in 7,795,893 cast
ballots by the ‘Total Registered Voters’ (see Enclosure 1: Column 8) that were not
cast by anyone in any of the three mandatory categories of ‘Total Republicans’,
‘Total Democrats’ or ‘All Other Parties’70, according the the DOE’s Official Results
for the 2022 General Election, which is an impossibility.
It is not possible to have a vote in the ‘Total Registered Voters’ column without it
correlating with a voter falling into one of the three mandatory categories of
‘Republican’, ‘Democrat’, or ‘Other’. The total registered voters is no more than an
accumulation of the three later voter identifications, found in columns 9-11.
This is a finding of massive fraud. It shows that all votes were stolen from all
registered voters who cast a vote in the 2022 election cycle, their votes were
concealed, deleted and/or altered in columns 9-11, which allowed the votes be
used as part of a shell game which hides the vote from the view, so that it can be
interchangeably placed into any of the three categories, allowing for an individual
or entity to arrange the votes to ‘select’, rather than elect, the winner.
Just as the zeros (in Columns 9-11 of the DOE’s precinct-level official results) are
necessary to hide the fraud; the dashes used instead of whole numbers (in races
or ballot-types, of the summary or precinct-level results), on the county
70 Herein known as ‘Others’
23 of 982
websites71, was another piece of the puzzle necessary to hide the fraud in this
shell game. Together, the zeros and dashes create access to fraudulently tallies
without the ability for one to reconcile the total votes in any race or for any ballot-
type, which removes an accurate overview of the will of the voters and creates a
palate primed for undetectable alteration and manipulation of election results.
Due to this massive misconduct, fraud and corruption, which has created
substantial non-compliance with statutory requirements, by multiple government
officials, listed above, it is sufficient to change or place in doubt the result of the
election. In such, the 2022 General Election cycle must be set aside and held
anew.
The fact that 7,795,893 votes cast by Republicans, Democrats and Others are
missing creates ~194,897,325 (7,795,893 x 25 votes cast per ballot) separate
violations of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(c)2. ‘The row immediately before the first data
record shall contain the column names of the data elements that make up the
data records. There shall be one header record followed by multiple data records’
and 3. ‘The data records shall include...Total Registered Republicans, Total
Registered Democrats (and) Total Registered All Other Parties…’
Since Defendant/Respondent DOE Dir. Matthews, who is overseen by and
answerable to Defendant/Respondent SOS Byrd, who is overseen by and
answerable to Defendant/Respondent Gov. DeSantis’ misconduct, fraud and

71 Described below and in violation of Fla. Stat. 98.0981(2)(a)
24 of 982
corruption violated Fla. Stat. 98.0981(c)2.and3., as well as 102.168(3)(a)and(c),
and each vote counts as a separate violation of the four aforementioned statutes,
the governor, secretary of state and DOE Director each creates four violations
(with an accumulative or 12 violations of the four statutes between the three
election officials) relating to the fraud pertaining to the DOEs website, as
described above, with an accumulative 2,338,767,900 (194,897,325 statewide
violations of votes cast but not part of official DOE record x 12 statutory
violations/4 each, per 3 officials) related violations, to the above mentioned
statutes, which is substantial noncompliance with statutory requirements
sufficient to change or place in doubt the result of the election.
B. ES&S: VOID BALLOTS DUE TO FRAUD, MISCONDUCT AND

CORRUPTION BASED ON UNCERTIFIED AND/OR UNCERTIFIABLE
ELECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT USED IN THE 2022 ELECTION
Election Systems & Software’s (herein known as ‘ES&S’) DS200 was not federally
certified, during the 2020 or 2022 election cycles, due to the vulnerabilities
related to the built-in modem.
Since each county, in Florida, accepted federal funds during the 2022 General
Election cycle, the option to use ES&S’ DS200 option for scanning and tabulating
ballots, at the precinct, was relinquished, due to the contract signed by HAVA/EAC
and each of the 49 supervisors of elections. Each of the 49 SOEs used ES&S
25 of 982
anyway, which necessarily voided each election held during the 202272 election
cycle, due to the security vulnerabilities allowing easy back-end access to the
system shattering the integrity of the entire election, effectively nullifying the
election and necessitating that it be set aside and held anew.
The 49 counties that used ES&S had an accumulative of 7,200,354 ballots cast,
which equals a combined 180,008,850 votes cast73. 180M+votes cast onto easily
hackable, high-risk and extremely vulnerable, uncertifiable elections machines is
an unconscionable act of misconduct that created substantial non-compliance
with statutory requirements, by the governor, secretary of state, director of
elections of the division of elections, and 49 of Florida’s supervisors of elections,
sufficient to change or place in doubt the result of the election, per Fla. Stat.
102.168(3)(a). Every vote, in each of the 49 counties is void, since the equipment
used was not federally certified and does not meet the safety standard for use in
Florida.
C. DOMINION: VOID BALLOTS DUE TO FRAUD, MISCONDUCT AND

CORRUPTION BASED ON UNCERTIFIED AND/OR UNCERTIFIABLE
ELECTION SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT USED IN THE 2022 ELECTION
Dominion Voting Systems Corporation (herein known as ‘Dominion’) was used in
18 counties throughout Florida during the 202274 election cycle. Dominion is a
72 And 2020
73 7,200,354 x 25 = 180,008,850 – a conservative county
74 And 2020
26 of 982
foreign-owned hardware and software company with intentionally built-in
vulnerabilities that have allowed and continue to allow 18 of Florida’s 67 counties
election results, at a precinct-level, to be manipulated and altered to the point
where elections have become ‘selections’ that install compromised officials
working for corrupt behind-the-scenes dictators, rather than as a representational
voice of the people’s will.
Dominion’s headquarters are located in socialist Canada with a Board of Directors
consisting of several Chinese nationals. Every Chinese national is by law an agent
of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
China has a current and active war doctrine that includes using unconventional
warfare against the United States, which includes bribing75 United States officials
and rigging US elections. China considers itself an enemy of the United States and
currently at war with the US. Dominion’s hardware is manufactured in China. Both
Dominion and ES&S us the same operating system that is used in, and was
created by, Smartmatic, which was created by Venezuelans.
At its base, Dominion is no more than a tool of destruction utilized by the Chinese
and other governments that position themselves as enemies of the United States,
and in such, of Florida. Dominion is, and has been since its inception, too
vulnerable – due to imperative public interest and national security – to be used in

75 China has an official bribe budget
27 of 982
Florida’s elections, whether it be 2022 or otherwise. Any Dominion76 equipment
used in Florida elections77, by necessity, are void due to the unmitigated risk of
election tampering that was built into the machines by enemies of the state 78.
For the reasons listed above, Florida’s governor, secretary of state, director of
elections for the division of elections and 18 supervisors of elections that used
Dominion during the 2022 election cycle did so either in error or in collusion with
behind-the-scenes enemies of the state, which due to the misconduct, fraud and
corruption of conspiring with foreigners (Canada) and enemies of the states
(China), as described herein, necessarily voids all and any ballots cast using
Dominion and all such related votes cast, ‘sufficient to change or place in doubt
the result of the election’, per Fla. Stat. 102.168(a), making all votes cast on
machines partially or fully foreign-owned and manufactured, illegal or rejected
votes ‘sufficient to change or place in doubt the result of the election’, per Fla.
Stat. 102.168(c).
There were 18 counties that illegally chose to use foreign-owned and
manufactured election equipment that is known to be insecure and not reliable for
use in the US for the several reasons listed above, which violates Fla. Stat.
102.168(a) due to (1) misconduct by each of the 18 SOEs for using equipment
76 This applies equally to ES&S hardware and software due to the Smartmatic
base which was created by foreigner, which necessarily created an
unacceptable risk to the sovereignty of the US when used within US and Florida
elections
77 Or anywhere else in the US
78 Including but not limited to Venezuela and China
28 of 982
that is not certifiable for use; (2) (constructive) fraud by concealing the
scientifically-proven vulnerabilities found in Dominion’s software, and pretending
the uncertifiable election equipment manufactured in a country with an active war
doctrine against the US, which includes election interference as a mode of
unconventional warfare, was reliable election equipment likely to create fair and
honest results without being altered or manipulated; and (3) it was a corrupt
practice for the 18 SOEs who used Dominion in their counties to use election
equipment they either knew or should have know was owned and influenced by
foreign powers. In such, each SOE violated each cast vote in their districts
accumulatively accounting for 595,539 votes cast, for which the 18 SOEs each
created three separate violations of Fla. Stat. 102.168(3)(a) relating to 1)
misconduct, (2) fraud, and 3) corruption for an accumulation of 54 violations of
the statute and totaling 32,159,106 violations against the votes cast within the 18
counties that used Dominion.
Under Florida Law, constructive fraud occurs where the plaintiff

establishes that both: a) The plaintiff and defendant were in a confidential
or fiduciary relationship; and b) The defendant: c) abused a duty owed to
the plaintiff; or took unfair advantage of the plaintiff. (Hansen v. Premier
Aviation Holdings, LLC, 2017 WL 8893119, at *3* (S.D. Fla. Nov. 21, 2017)
(applying Florida law; Levy v. Levy, 862 So. 2d 48, 53 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
In such, the 202279, election cycle must be set aside and held anew due to the
imminent threat to national security and the imperative importance to have and
79 As well as the 2020
29 of 982
maintain fair and honest elections both in Florida and nationwide, which is the
right of every American.
D. UNLAWFUL SELF-CERTIFICATION OF OWN RACE BENEFITTING SELF

BY GOVERNOR DESANTIS, ATTORNEY GENERAL MOODY AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PATRONIS
On Nov. 22, 2022, the Election Canvassing Commission, which consisted of
Governor DeSantis, Attorney General Moody and Chief Financial Officer Patronis
certified ‘the official results80 for federal, state, and multi county races’ under the
false pretense that the authority given to them81 by Fla. Stat. 102.111, but
actually in violation of Fla. Stat. 104.051, since using one’s official government
position to benefit oneself is a violation of Fla. Stat. 104.31(1), “No officer...of the
state...shall: (a) Use his or her official authority or influence for the purpose of
interfering with an election or a nomination of office…’
Due to the statutory violations of self-certification created under Florida’s Election
Code Statute 104.31(1) DeSantis, Moody and Patronis are mandatorily ‘excluded
from the polls’, per Fla. Stat. 104.051, due to their fraudulent performance of their
duties, per Fla. Stat. 104.051(3), based on Fla. Stat. 102.111(1). which has
created a backup plan to fill vacancies due to just a scenario as this, when the
governor, attorney general and chief financial officer each is conflicted out of
being eligible to certify the election since doing so would benefit themselves. See
80 Enclosure 10a: Press Release: Secretary of State Cord Byrd Announces Election
Canvassing Commission Certification will be held on Tuesday, Nov. 22, 2022
81 While the authority is given, it is not given to those who are not eligible
30 of 982
Fla. Stat. 102.111(1), “If a member of the commission is unable to serve for any
reason, the Governor shall appoint a remaining member of the Cabinet. If there is
a further vacancy, the remaining members of the commission shall agree on
another election official to fill the vacancy.”
As a result of the staggering boldness of DeSantis, Moody and Patronis by refusing
to step down due to the glaring conflict of interest in certifying that Governor
DeSantis, Attorney General Moody and Chief Financial Officer Patronis each won
their own elections, which voids all elections they certified due to fraud. ‘Fraud
vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents and even judgments.’ Boyce v.
Grundy, 3 Pet. 210 (1830)
Relating to this violation of Fla. Stat. 102.111(1) and 104.31(1) by three election
officials, at a rate of 194,897,325 total violations against votes cast per ballot
statewide, the three officials based on 2 violations per official have created a total
of 1,169,383,950 violations relating to fraudulently certifying their own elections
to ensure the cover-up of fraud within their own race, as well as those throughout
the 67 counties.
Due to the misconduct, fraud and corruption, per Fla. Stat. 102.168(3)(a), by
named officials listed above and as described above ‘sufficient to change or place
in doubt the result of the election’ and in explanation of their refusal to address
substantial noncompliance with statutory violations that took place in Florida’s 67
31 of 982
counties, which resulted in DeSantis, Moody and Patronis winning their races, it is
necessary to set aside the 2022 election and hold it anew.
E. CLEAR BALLOT IS AN UNAUTHORIZED AND UNCERTIFIABLE VOTING

SYSTEM THAT COUNTED BALLOTS REAL-TIME & DAILY THROUGHOUT
FLORIDA’S ENTIRE VOTING CYCLE, WHICH INCLUDED COUNTING
EVERY VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOT AND EARLY VOTE BALLOT, IN 26
COUNTIES, IN FLORIDA, WHICH CONSISTED OF 4,899,635 82
INDIVIDUAL BALLOTS, EQUALLY MORE THAN 122,490,875
INDIVIDUAL VOTES83 COUNTED BEFORE THE CLOSE OF THE POLLS
ON ELECTION DAY, IN VIOLATION OF FLA. STAT. 101.5614
In 26 of Florida’s counties, ~122,490,875 votes cast on 4,899,635 ballots84 were
fraudulently counted on Clear Ballot’s real-time ballot counting software, which
voids the results for each of those 26 counties85.
All 26 counties that used Clear Ballot used it as part of their voting system to
count all Vote-By-Mail and Early Vote Ballots, in advance, which violates Fla. Stat.
101.561486, because no votes can be counted until after the polls close on
Election Day. The votes were counted early to allow the Supervisor of Election and
his/her workers the ability to create enough new ballots to change the result of
any particular race or referendum. In such, all votes cast in the 26 counties using
Clear Ballot’s hardware and software, during Florida’s 2022 election cycle, are
82 See Enclosure 11: 26 Florida Counties Illegally Used Clear Ballot Auditing
Products Which Are Not Certified for Use in the State of Florida
83 Assuming a conservative count of an average of 25 separate statewide or
federal races and referendums, per ballot, in each county, combined
(8,970,125 x 25 = 224,253,125)
84 4,899,635 ballots x 25 average races or referendums per ballot = 122,490,875
85 See Enclosure 11a: Clear Ballot Spreadsheet
86 It also violations Fla. Stat. 104.041, 104.051, 104.061
32 of 982
void due to the fraud of 1) using the uncertified voting system, which 2) allowed
votes to be counted early.
Fraud vitiates everything. Nudd v. Burrows, 91 U.S 426 (1875)
Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit... includes the

deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary
obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, ... and if he
deliberately conceals material information from them he is guilty of fraud.
Donnelly v. Dechristoforo, 1974.SCT.41709 ¶ 56; 416 U.S. 637 (1974)
McNally v. U.S., 483U.S. 350, 371-372
State has legitimate and strong interest in preventing voter fraud.

Democratic Executive Committee of Florida v. Lee, 915 F.3d 1312, U.S.C.A.
11th Cir. Feb. 15, 2019
It was an act of misconduct, fraud and corruption87 by Governor DeSantis,
Secretary of State Cord Byrd, the Director of Elections for the Division of Elections
Maria Matthews, as well as the 26 Supervisors of Elections to allow Clear Ballot to
be used in Florida’s election. Clear Ballot is not, was not and never has been
certified during the 2022 Election Cycle for use as a voting system. Further, none
of Clear Ballot products were, or could have been, approved as a non-voting
system during the 2022 election cycle88, due to the fact that the system was
created so that votes could be counted and altered, at will, during the entire
election cycle, which specifically allows election officials and/or workers to alter,
manipulate, destroy and conceal the actual vote of the people.
87 In violation of Fla. Stat. 102.168(a)

88 Certifications have to be renewed every two years. Approvals for ‘non-voting
systems’ appear to be no more than an act of deception in an attempt by the
SOS and DOE to dupe people into believing the product has a right to be used,
when it doesn’t, which makes it an act of fraud on the People to steal their
votes.
33 of 982
IV. Imminent Irreparable Harm
The election fraud that took place throughout Florida’s 67 counties installed
officials, rather than having them elected by the people. This has allowed a soft
coup and a quiet overthrow of the government to begin. It is of imperative public
importance that we right this wrong immediate by setting aside the 2022 General
Election cycle and holding it anew.
V. Likelihood of Success on the Merits
Scott’s facts are backed up by hard evidence89 showing that no votes were
counted by the Division of Elections relating to the 2022 General Election cycle;
that the election equipment used to scan and count ballots throughout Florida
was no certifiable, and much of which is foreign-owned and manufactured; that
there were hundreds of millions of violations relating to county SOE records; that
all records throughout Florida’s 67 county SOEs are void due to fraud; and that
there were well over 3 billion statutory violations during Florida’s 2022 General
Election which was sufficient to change or place in doubt the results of the
elections. For these reasons, there is a very high likelihood of success on the
merits.
VI. Balance of Equities
For this court to weigh the balance of equities, it must take into consideration that
no harm comes to the State of Florida, or the country as a whole, by

89 Official government documents
34 of 982
acknowledging that the 2022 General Election, in Florida, was altered to ‘select’
representatives, instead of allowing the registered voters of Florida to elect their
representation. In fact, allowing the 2022 General Election, in Florida, to be set
aside and held anew preserves the rights of every American registered to vote in
Florida.
With nearly 4 billions violations of Florida’s Election Code, solely relating to the
2022 General Election described above, and with a huge number not counted
because the corruption is simply too massive include in its entirety, it is clear that
the public interest was not served due to the lack of fairness in the result of the
election.
Each Floridian was injured by the fraudulent election, not just the ones who were
registered to vote or who did vote, but each American, who is protected by the
constitution and guaranteed a fair election which, in turn, guarantees a
representative government. Without setting aside the 2022 General Election and
holding it anew, the constitutional rights of every American who lives in Florida
has been trampled, which cannot be allowed to stand because if it does, it will
ultimately allow for further interference in our elections, which will very quickly
lead to the fall of our country.
VII. Public Interest
35 of 982
This is an election case of imperative public importance because it deals with
returning the right of the vote to be counted for each Floridian, as no votes were
counted during the 2022 General Election cycle, as well as halting an on-going
coup and attempt at overthrowing the government, in Florida, and more broadly
in the United States, as well as removing the freedoms of Americans and replacing
it with a slave system owned and dictated by a group of elites. It is of imperative
public importance that Americans remain living in a free county, in a Republic.
VIII. Conclusion
It is of imperative public interest that this court review and decide this case due to
the urgency of resolving matters relating to Florida’s fraudulently altered 2022
General elections, the current attempt at a coup to overthrow Florida’s
government, helmed by Governor DeSantis, and more broadly, it is a war against
We the People to overthrow the US government. The fact that China manufactured
and partially owns Dominion taints each of machine stemming from China,
specifically due to its active war doctrine against the US, which includes non-
traditional warfare such as elections and the use of bio-weapons.
Scott’s personal filings have discovered and proven that Florida’s judiciary can be
used to prevent a valid election case from being hear. Cases, in Florida, are
funneled to compromised judges and blocked by bought and/or anti-American
clerks who have the intention of overthrowing the government. This case is too
36 of 982
vital to nation security and imperative important to the public to allow a lower
court to hear it. It must be determined either by Justice Clarence, or if he prefers,
the Supreme Court as a whole due to the integrity of the United States Supreme
Court, to ensure Scott receives a fair trial. This case does not represent Scott
alone. It represents every single American, as each of us deserves an honest or
fair election and representation.
The arguments and evidence in this application barely touches the surface of the
state and county violations that were made against Florida’s Election Code, which,
as shown above accumulatively total 3,822,709,781 against votes cast throughout
the state.
For the 3B+ reasons90 - via the various ways described throughout this application
- Scott has shown that the 2022 General Election must be set aside and held
anew, in Florida, due to the 1) substantial non-compliance with statutory
requirements, 2) sufficient to change or place in doubt the results of Florida’s
2022 General Election.
The election should be set aside because this court has been given the evidence,
taken from the official results from the 2022 General Election, at a state, county
and precinct-level, that there were more than 3.8B separate violations of election
90 Which is the just the tip of the iceberg
37 of 982
fraud that occurred, in Florida, to determine by fact that reasonable doubt exists
as to whether Florida’s certified election expressed the will of the voters, which it
did not.
An election should be set aside if a court finds substantial non-compliance

with a statutory election procedure and also makes a factual determination
that reasonable doubt exists as to whether a certified election expressed
the will of the voters. Kinney v. Putnam County Canvassing Board by and
through Harris, 253 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
Scott’s request of this court is that it set aside Florida’s 2022 General Election and
hold it anew, on one day91, using paper ballots92, counted without interruption at a
precinct-level until all ballots have been counted, with public observation – no
Vote-By-Mail or Early Voting, just one day, as stated above, in an attempt to
secure the election from misconduct, fraud and corruption.
Sincerely,
/s/Christine Scott
Christine Scott
91 The day of the election

92 Voting on ADA devices is voting by machine, not by paper ballot. The machines
spit out a receipt, which is not the same as a ballot. Alterations can be made
when voting is done by device which leaves elections vulnerable to widespread
fraud.
38 of 982
MEMORANDUM OF LAW
CASE LAW AND FLORIDA STATUTES IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION
A. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASE LAW DICTATES THE NEED TO

SET ASIDE FLORIDA’S 2022 ELECTION CYCLE AND HOLD IT ANEW
The right to vote can neither be denied outright, nor can it be destroyed by
alteration of ballots, nor diluted by ballot-box stuffing. Reynolds v. Sims,
377 U.S. 533 (1964)
The right to vote freely for candidate of one’s choice is of the essence of
democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at heart of
representative government. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)
The right of suffrage is a fundamental matter in a free and democratic

society; since right to exercise franchise in free and unimpaired manner is
preservative of other basic civil and political rights any alleged
infringement of right of citizens to vote must be carefully and meticulously
scrutinized. U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 14. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533
(1964)
The Constitution of United States protects right of all qualified citizens to

vote, in state as well as in federal elections. U.S.C.A.Const. Amends. 14,
15, 17, 19, 23, 24. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)
The right to vote freely for candidate of one’s choice is of the essence of
democratic society, and any restrictions on that right strike at heart of
representative government. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)
The constitution forbids sophisticated as well as simple-minded modes of

discrimination. U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 14. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533
(1964)
Each citizen has an inalienable right to full and effective participation in

political processes of his state’s legislative bodies; full and effective
participation requires that each citizen has an equally effective voice in
election of members of his state legislature. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533
(1964)
39 of 982
A denial of constitutionally protected rights demands judicial protection.

Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964)
Preservation of integrity of electoral process is legitimate and valid state

goal. Rosario v. Rockerfeller, 410 U.S. 752 (1973); Bullock v. Carter, U.S.
134, 145, 92 S. Ct. 849, 857, 31 L. Ed. 2D 92 (1972)
As well-established by election contest statute, right to a correct count of

ballots in an election is substantial right which it is the privilege of every
candidate for office to insist on, in every case where there has been a
failure to make a proper count, call, tally, or return of the votes as required
by law, and this fact has been duly established as the basis for granting
relief. Gore v. Harris, 772 So. 2d 1243 (2000)
B. FLORIDA STATUTE 102.168(3)(a,c,d)93 DICTATES THE NEED TO SET

ASIDE FLORIDA’S 2022 ELECTION CYCLE AND HOLD IT ANEW
Fla. Stat. 102.168 Contest of election. — (3) ...The grounds for contesting
an election under this section are: (a) Misconduct, fraud, or corruption on
the part of any election official or any member of the canvassing board
sufficient to change or place in doubt the result of the election...(c) Receipt
of a number of illegal votes or rejection of a number of legal votes
sufficient to change or place in doubt the result of the election. (d) Proof
that any elector, election official, or canvassing board member was given
or offered a bribe or reward in money, property, or any other thing of value
for the purpose of procuring the successful candidate’s nomination or
election or determining the result on any question submitted by
referendum.
C. FLORIDA CASE LAW DICTATES THE NEED TO SET ASIDE FLORIDA’S

2022 ELECTION CYCLE AND HOLD IT ANEW
An election should be set aside if a court finds substantial non-compliance

with a statutory election procedure and also makes a factual determination
that reasonable doubt exists as to whether a certified election expressed
the will of the voters. Kinney v. Putnam County Canvassing Board by and
through Harris, 253 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
Courts must interfere with an election process when the will of the people
is affected by the wrongful conduct. See Boardman v. Esteva, 323 So. 2d
93 See Footnote 14: Fla. Stat. 102.168(3)
40 of 982
259 (Fla. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 967, 48 L. Ed. 2d 791, 96 S. Ct.
2162 (1976); Gilligan v. Special Road & Bridge District, 74 Fla. 320, 77 So.
84 (1917).
Courts cannot ignore fraudulent conduct which is purposefully done to foul

the election or corrupt the ballot. See Wilson v. Revels, 61 So. 2d 491 (Fla.
1952)
In determining whether an election should be set aside because of alleged

fraudulent conduct or noncompliance with election procedures, the court
has set forth the following factors for consideration: (a) the presence or
absence of fraud, gross negligence, or intentional wrongdoing; (b) whether
there has been substantial compliance with the essential requirements of
the absentee voting law; and (c) whether the irregularities complained of
adversely affect the sanctity of the ballot and the integrity of the election.
A fair election is the paramount consideration. Strict application of
technical procedural requirements is not mandated where there has been
substantial compliance with the requirements and there was no
interference with the sanctity or integrity of the ballot. Bolden v. Potter,
452 So. 2d 564 (Fla.1984)
If court finds substantial noncompliance with statutory election procedures

and makes factual determination that reasonable doubt exists as to
whether a certified election expressed the will of the voters, then court
must void contested election even in the absence of fraud or intentional
wrongdoing. Beckstrom v. Volusia County Canvassing Bd., 707 So.2d 720
(1998)
Court cannot sustain election, if there was substantial noncompliance by

election officials caused by intentional wrongdoing, if results do not reflect
voters’ will. See Beckstrom v. Volusia County Canvassing Board, 707 So. 2d
720 (Fla. 1998)
(W)hen there is present fraud and intentional wrongdoing, which clearly

affect the sanctity of the ballot and the integrity of the election process,
courts must not be reluctant to invalidate those elections to endure public
credibility in the electoral process. See Bolden v. Potter, 452 So. 2d 564
(Fla.1984)
As long as the fraud, from whatever source, is such that the true result of
the election cannot be ascertained with reasonable certainty, the ballots
affected should be invalidated. Bolden v. Potter, 452 So. 2d 564 (Fla.1984)
41 of 982
Courts cannot ignore fraudulent conduct which is purposefully done to foul

the election or corrupt the ballot. Fraud and corruption may permeate the
entire absentee balloting process, regardless of whether the number of
ballots conclusively shown to be invalid would change the outcome of the
election. Once substantial fraud or corruption has been established to the
extent that it permeated the election process, it is unnecessary to
demonstrate with mathematical certainty that the number of fraudulently
cast ballots actually affected the outcome of the election. Bolden v. Potter,
452 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 1984)
As long as the fraud, from whatever source, is such that the true result of
the election cannot be ascertained with reasonable certainty, the ballots
affected should be invalidated. Bolden v. Potter, 452 So. 2d 564 (Fla.1984)
Irregularities in the holding of popular elections will invalidate them where

they have not been free and fair and the result changed by reason of such
irregularities. See Gillian v. Special Road and Bridge District N.4 of Lee
County, 74 Fla. 320, 77 So. 84 (1917)
Sanctity of free and honest elections is cornerstone of true democracy.

Matter of Protest Election Returns and Absentee Ballots in November 4,
1997 Election for City of Miami, FL, 707 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
42 of 982
D. RELATING TO JUDGE, JURISDICTION AND IMPARTIALITY
See Enclosure d1: J. Lee Marsh added to Contest of Election for aiding Defendants
in acts of RICO and Treason
It is ethical responsibility of all judges to know the law and to faithfully

follow it. Garcia v. Manning, 717 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
“A judgment rendered by a court without personal jurisdiction over the

defendant is void. It is a nullity.” Hagans v Lavine 415 U. S. 533 (1974)
Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to

exist.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. 395 F 2d 906, 910 (1974)
By law, a judge is a state officer. The judge then acts not as a judge, but as
a private individual (in his person). When a judge acts as a trespasser of the
law, when a judge does not follow the law, the Judge loses subject-matter
43 of 982
jurisdiction and the judges' orders are not voidable, but VOID, and of no
legal force or effect. The U.S. Supreme Court stated that "when a state
officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal
Constitution, he comes into conflict with the superior authority of that
Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative
character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his
individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States. Scheuer v.
Rhodes, 416 U.S. 1683, 1687 (1974)
E. PUBLIC RECORDS
44 of 982
F. PRO SE LITIGANT
Pro se pleadings are to be considered without regard to technicality; pro se

litigants' pleadings are not to be held to the same high standards of
perfection as lawyers. Jenkins v. McKeithen, 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1959);
Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.,151 Fed 2nd 240; Pucket v. Cox,456 2nd 233
[P]ro se complaints must be liberally construed. See Haines v. Kerner, 404
U.S. 519, 520 (1972)
(Plaintiff) asks the court to take judicial notice of the fact that (she) is
without counsel, is not schooled in the law and legal procedures, and is not
licensed to practice law. Therefore (her) pleadings must be read and
construed liberally. See Haines. v Kerner, 404 US at 520 (1972)
G. RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL
The issue “is not whether a plaintiff will ultimately prevail but whether the
claimant is entitled to offer evidence to support the claims.” Scheuer v.
Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 235-36 (1974), overruled on other grounds by Davis
v. Schere, 468 U.S. 183 (1984) Scott had demanded a jury trial. She had
the right to present evidence, but was denied that right. Per Fla. Stat.
102.168(5), “A statement of the grounds of contest may not be rejected,
nor the proceedings dismissed, by the court for any want of form if the
grounds of contest provided in the statement are sufficient to clearly
inform the defendant of the particular proceeding or cause for which the
nomination or election is contested.” Scott’s Contest of Election ‘clearly
informed the defendants of the particular proceedings and in such could
not be rejected nor dismissed. The judge violated Scott’s right to a fair trial
when he dismissed the case, in violation of the statute governing the case,
Fla. Stat. 102.168, specifically subsection (5), when he (who was a
defendants and no longer with jurisdiction over the case) dismissed it.
A court should not dismiss a complaint “unless it appears beyond doubt

that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claims which
45 of 982
One of the hallmarks of the American judicial system is that every litigant
is entitled to “[a] fair trial in a fair tribunal.” In re Murchinson, 349 US 133,
136 (1955)
A court should not dismiss a complaint “unless it appears beyond doubt

that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claims which
‘Four corners including attachments’ Oceanside Plaza Condominium,

Ass’n . Foam King Industries, Inc., 206 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
H. RELATING TO VOID ORDERS
...judgment entered by a court that lacked subject matter jurisdiction was

void and subject to motion for relief from judgment at any time. When it is
determined that a judgment is void, the trial court has no discretion but to
vacate the judgment. Rodriguez v. Thompson, 235 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 2d DCA
2017) includes a void order or decree. DeLaOsa v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
208 So. 3d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
Relief by motion is available from a void judgment. Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b)

(4) In fact, on proper motion, trial courts must set aside void judgment.
Kruger v. Ponton, 6 So. 3d 1239 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) In such a situation, the
trial court has no discretion and is obligated to vacate the judgment. Bank
of New York Mellon v. Sperling, 201 So. 3d 607 (Fla. 4DCA 2016).
A void order has no force or effect and is a nullity. Lance Block, P.A. v.
Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., 85 So. 3d 1122 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2012)
...judgment entered by a court that lacked subject matter jurisdiction was

void and subject to motion for relief from judgment at any time. When it is
determined that a judgment is void, the trial court has no discretion but to
vacate the judgment. Rodriguez v. Thompson, 235 So. 3d 986 (Fla. 2d DCA
2017) includes a void order or decree. DeLaOsa v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,
208 So. 3d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
46 of 982
There is no time limitation on setting aside a void judgment – it may be

collaterally attacked at any time. M.L. Builders, Inc v. Reserve Developers,
LLP, 769 So. 2d 1079, 1082 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
47 of 982
I. RELATING TO DUTIES OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA
48 of 982
Enclosures:
Enclosure a1: United States Supreme Court: Rule 11
49 of 982
Enclosure b1: United States Supreme Court: Rule 22
50 of 982
Enclosure c1: Federal Court of Appeals: Rule 2 & 11th Cir. R. 2-1
51 of 982
Enclosure d1: J. LEE MARSH ADDED TO AMENDED CONTEST OF ELECTION

FOR AIDING DEFENDANTS IN ACTS OF RICO AND TREASON, FILED ON MAY
17, 2023 (Florida’s Leon County Circuit Court, Case #2022CA2105, filing
#173412798, pages 1, 4 and 6) AND JUNE 19, 2023 (Florida’s Leon
County Circuit Court, Case #2022CA2105, filing #175626779, pages 1, 4
and 8)
52 of 982
53 of 982
54 of 982
55 of 982
56 of 982
57 of 982
d1. MOTIONS, OBJECTIONS AND DENIALS TO DISQUALIFY JUDGE MARSH
58 of 982
59 of 982
60 of 982
61 of 982
62 of 982
63 of 982
64 of 982
65 of 982
66 of 982
67 of 982
68 of 982
69 of 982
70 of 982
71 of 982
72 of 982
73 of 982
74 of 982
75 of 982
76 of 982
77 of 982
78 of 982
79 of 982
80 of 982
81 of 982
82 of 982
83 of 982
84 of 982
85 of 982
86 of 982
87 of 982
88 of 982
89 of 982
90 of 982
91 of 982
92 of 982
93 of 982
94 of 982
95 of 982
96 of 982
97 of 982
98 of 982
99 of 982
100 of 982
101 of 982
102 of 982
103 of 982
104 of 982
105 of 982
106 of 982
107 of 982
108 of 982
109 of 982
110 of 982
111 of 982
112 of 982
113 of 982
114 of 982
115 of 982
116 of 982
117 of 982
118 of 982
119 of 982
120 of 982
121 of 982
122 of 982
123 of 982
124 of 982
125 of 982
126 of 982
127 of 982
128 of 982
129 of 982
130 of 982
131 of 982
132 of 982
133 of 982
134 of 982
135 of 982
136 of 982
137 of 982
138 of 982
139 of 982
140 of 982
141 of 982
142 of 982
143 of 982
144 of 982
145 of 982
146 of 982
147 of 982
148 of 982
149 of 982
150 of 982
151 of 982
152 of 982
153 of 982
154 of 982
155 of 982
156 of 982
157 of 982
158 of 982
159 of 982
160 of 982
161 of 982
162 of 982
163 of 982
164 of 982
165 of 982
166 of 982
167 of 982
168 of 982
169 of 982
170 of 982
171 of 982
172 of 982
173 of 982
174 of 982
175 of 982
176 of 982
177 of 982
178 of 982
179 of 982
180 of 982
181 of 982
182 of 982
183 of 982
184 of 982
185 of 982
186 of 982
187 of 982
188 of 982
189 of 982
190 of 982
191 of 982
192 of 982
193 of 982
194 of 982
195 of 982
196 of 982
197 of 982
198 of 982
199 of 982
200 of 982
201 of 982
202 of 982
203 of 982
204 of 982
205 of 982
206 of 982
207 of 982
208 of 982
209 of 982
210 of 982
211 of 982
212 of 982
213 of 982
214 of 982
215 of 982
216 of 982
217 of 982
218 of 982
219 of 982
220 of 982
221 of 982
222 of 982
223 of 982
224 of 982
225 of 982
226 of 982
227 of 982
228 of 982
229 of 982
230 of 982
231 of 982
232 of 982
233 of 982
234 of 982
235 of 982
236 of 982
237 of 982
238 of 982
239 of 982
240 of 982
241 of 982
242 of 982
243 of 982
244 of 982
245 of 982
246 of 982
247 of 982
248 of 982
249 of 982
250 of 982
251 of 982
252 of 982
253 of 982
254 of 982
255 of 982
256 of 982
257 of 982
258 of 982
259 of 982
260 of 982
261 of 982
262 of 982
263 of 982
264 of 982
265 of 982
266 of 982
267 of 982
268 of 982
269 of 982
270 of 982
271 of 982
272 of 982
273 of 982
274 of 982
275 of 982
276 of 982
277 of 982
278 of 982
279 of 982
280 of 982
281 of 982
282 of 982
283 of 982
284 of 982
285 of 982
286 of 982
287 of 982
288 of 982
289 of 982
290 of 982
291 of 982
292 of 982
293 of 982
294 of 982
295 of 982
296 of 982
297 of 982
298 of 982
299 of 982
300 of 982
301 of 982
302 of 982
303 of 982
304 of 982
305 of 982
306 of 982
307 of 982
308 of 982
309 of 982
310 of 982
311 of 982
312 of 982
313 of 982
314 of 982
315 of 982
316 of 982
317 of 982
318 of 982
319 of 982
320 of 982
321 of 982
322 of 982
323 of 982
324 of 982
325 of 982
326 of 982
327 of 982
328 of 982
329 of 982
330 of 982
331 of 982
332 of 982
333 of 982
334 of 982
335 of 982
336 of 982
337 of 982
338 of 982
339 of 982
340 of 982
341 of 982
342 of 982
343 of 982
344 of 982
345 of 982
346 of 982
347 of 982
348 of 982
349 of 982
350 of 982
351 of 982
352 of 982
353 of 982
354 of 982
355 of 982
356 of 982
357 of 982
358 of 982
359 of 982
360 of 982
361 of 982
362 of 982
363 of 982
364 of 982
365 of 982
366 of 982
367 of 982
368 of 982
369 of 982
370 of 982
371 of 982
372 of 982
373 of 982
374 of 982
375 of 982
376 of 982
377 of 982
378 of 982
379 of 982
380 of 982
381 of 982
382 of 982
383 of 982
384 of 982
385 of 982
386 of 982
387 of 982
388 of 982
389 of 982
390 of 982
391 of 982
392 of 982
393 of 982
394 of 982
395 of 982
396 of 982
397 of 982
398 of 982
399 of 982
400 of 982
401 of 982
402 of 982
403 of 982
404 of 982
405 of 982
406 of 982
407 of 982
408 of 982
409 of 982
410 of 982
411 of 982
412 of 982
413 of 982
414 of 982
415 of 982
416 of 982
417 of 982
418 of 982
419 of 982
420 of 982
421 of 982
422 of 982
423 of 982
424 of 982
425 of 982
426 of 982
427 of 982
428 of 982
429 of 982
430 of 982
431 of 982
432 of 982
433 of 982
434 of 982
435 of 982
436 of 982
437 of 982
438 of 982
439 of 982
440 of 982
441 of 982
442 of 982
Enclosure g1: 1) FLORIDA STATUTE RELATING TO ATTORNEY GENERAL’S

DUTIES; 2) FLA. STAT. 111.07: DEFENSE OF CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST
PUBLIC OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, OR AGENTS; (4) FLA. STAT. 768.28(9)(a)
443 of 982
444 of 982
FLA. STAT. 768.28(9)(a)
445 of 982
Enclosure 1. Precinct-Level Election Results Data Definitions and Field Codes
446 of 982
447 of 982
448 of 982
Enclosure 2. Sample of the Official Results for the Precinct-Level Results for the
Precinct-Level Results for 2022 General Election Cycle Taken From Florida’s
Division of Elections Website
2-1. 2022 Alachua County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-2. 2022 Baker County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
449 of 982
450 of 982
2-3. 2022 Bay County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-4. 2022 Bradford County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-5. 2022 Brevard County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
451 of 982
452 of 982
2-6. 2022 Broward County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-7. 2022 Calhoun County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-8. 2022 Charlotte County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
453 of 982
454 of 982
2-9. 2022 Citrus County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-10. 2022 Clay County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-11. 2022 Collier County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
455 of 982
456 of 982
2-12. 2022 Columbia County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-13. 2022 Dade County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-14. 2022 DeSoto County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
457 of 982
458 of 982
2-15. 2022 Dixie County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-16. 2022 Duval County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-17. 2022 Escambia County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
459 of 982
460 of 982
2-18. 2022 Flagler County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-19. 2022 Franklin County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-20. 2022 Gadsden County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
461 of 982
462 of 982
2-21. 2022 Gilchrist County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-22. 2022 Glades County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2.23. 2022 Gulf County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
463 of 982
464 of 982
2.24. 2022 Hamilton County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-25. 2022 Hardee County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-26. 2022 Hendry County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
465 of 982
466 of 982
2-27. 2022 Hernando County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-28. 2022 Highlands County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-29. 2022 Hillsborough County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
467 of 982
468 of 982
2-30. 2022 Holmes County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-31. 2022 Indian River County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-32. 2022 Jackson County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
469 of 982
470 of 982
2-33. 2022 Jefferson County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-34. 2022 Lafayette County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-35. 2022 Lake County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
471 of 982
472 of 982
2-36. 2022 Lee County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-37. 2022 Leon County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-38. 2022 Levy County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
473 of 982
474 of 982
2-39. 2022 Liberty County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-40. 2022 Madison County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-41. 2022 Manatee County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
475 of 982
476 of 982
2-42. 2022 Monroe County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-43. 2022 Marion County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-44. 2022 Martin County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
477 of 982
478 of 982
2-45. 2022 Nassau County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-46. 2022 Okaloosa County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-47. 2022 Okeechobee County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
479 of 982
480 of 982
2-48. 2022 Orange County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-49. 2022 Osceola County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-50. 2022 Palm Beach County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
481 of 982
482 of 982
2-51. 2022 Pasco County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-52. 2022 Pinellas County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-53. 2022 Polk County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
483 of 982
484 of 982
2-54. 2022 Putnam County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-55. 2022 Santa Rosa County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-56. 2022 Sarasota County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
485 of 982
486 of 982
2-57. 2022 Seminole County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-58. 2022 St. Johns County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-59. 2022 St. Lucie County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
487 of 982
488 of 982
2-60. 2022 Sumter County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-61. 2022 Suwannee County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-62. 2022 Taylor County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
489 of 982
490 of 982
2-63. 2022 Union County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-64. 2022 Volusia County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
2-65. 2022 Wakulla County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
491 of 982
492 of 982
2-66. 2022 Walton County Sample of General Election - No Registered Voters

That Voted
2-67. 2022 Washington County Sample of General Election - No Registered

Voters That Voted
493 of 982
3. SAMPLE OF THE OFFICIAL RESULTS SHOWING THAT NO REGISTERED

VOTERS VOTED DURING THE PRECINCT-LEVEL RESULTS FROM EIGHT
COUNTIES DURING THE PRIMARY ELECTION CYCLE - DATA TAKEN FROM
FLORIDA’S DIVISION OF ELECTIONS WEBSITE
3-1. 2022 Charlotte County Sample of Primary Election - No Registered

‘Republicans’, ‘Democrats’ or ‘All Other Parties’, respectively represented in
Columns 9-11.
3-2. 2022 Gadsden County Sample of Primary Election - No Registered

Columns 9-11.
3.3. 2022 Gulf County Sample of Primary Election - No Registered

Columns 9-11.
494 of 982
3-4. 2022 Hardee County Sample of Primary Election - No Registered

Columns 9-11.
3-5. 2022 Hendry County Sample of Primary Election - No Registered

Columns 9-11.
495 of 982
3-6. 2022 Orange County Sample of Primary Election - No Registered

Columns 9-11.
3-7. 2022 Pinellas County Sample of Primary Election - No Registered

Columns 9-11.
496 of 982
3-8. 2022 Seminole County Sample of Primary Election - No Registered ‘Voters’,

Columns 8-11.
3-9. 2022 Washington County Sample of Primary Election - No Registered

Columns 9-11.
497 of 982
4. EMAILS TO, OR COPIED, TO SECRETARY OF STATE CORD BYRD

ADDRESSING FRAUD IN FLORIDA’S 2022 ELECTION CYCLE
498 of 982
499 of 982
500 of 982
501 of 982
502 of 982
503 of 982
504 of 982
505 of 982
506 of 982
507 of 982
508 of 982
509 of 982
510 of 982
511 of 982
512 of 982
513 of 982
514 of 982
515 of 982
516 of 982
517 of 982
518 of 982
519 of 982
520 of 982
521 of 982
522 of 982
523 of 982
524 of 982
525 of 982
526 of 982
527 of 982
528 of 982
529 of 982
530 of 982
531 of 982
532 of 982
533 of 982
534 of 982
535 of 982
536 of 982
537 of 982
538 of 982
539 of 982
540 of 982
541 of 982
542 of 982
543 of 982
544 of 982
545 of 982
546 of 982
547 of 982
548 of 982
549 of 982
550 of 982
551 of 982
552 of 982
4a. EMAILS RELATING TO EXCLUSIVE ADA MACHINE USE IN LEE & PALM
BEACH COUNTIES DURING THE 2022 ELECTION CYCLE
553 of 982
5. IMAGES OF ELECTION DAY BOXES BEING UNSEALED, BALLOTS BEING

REMOVED AND REPLACED, LOG SHEETS IN HAND, BOXES RESEALED AND
PUT IN SHELF IN WAREHOUSE
Palm Beach County Election Day Precinct-Level Ballot Boxes can be

identified by the white label placed on the outside of each box, which is
sealed at the precinct before transferred to the warehouse for storage.
These boxes are never to be unsealed unless for an audit or recount.
Yet, just after midnight, in the early morning after Election Day, the Palm
Beach County Supervisor of Elections office opened each of the precinct-
level ballot boxes, took out the ballots and replaced them with another
back of ballots and a different log sheet, which matched the computer
manipulation done at a machine level. You can prove by (1) checking the
fingerprints on the ballots; (2) checking the DHS’s Albert video footage;
(3) retrieving the video footage from the Palm Beach County Supervisor
of Elections who has thus far refused to abide by the public records
requests to see it.
The below image shows a man in black pants and a purple shirt pulling a
pallet of precinct-level ballot boxes into view as the last of the public
observers were leaving because they were told all activities had ceased
for the evening.
I saw the activity in the back and stayed. Public observers have the legal
right to remain as long as workers were still there, so I told Wendy that I
would remain until the work was finished.
It is important to realize that during the public observation, between

June 28, 2022 and August 23, 2022, there had not been anything in that
back area of the warehouse. It had been empty. But on this early
morning after election day for the primary election, an entire work space
had been set up which was clearly designed specifically for the task of
opening sealed precinct-level ballot boxes, removing the ballots and log
sheets that came from the precincts, then replacing the precinct ballots
with different ballots which were handed off by people on the right side
of the makeshift work space back over to the election workers on the left
side of the workspace, then the boxes were resealed and put in shelves
for storage.
To the best of my understanding, the ballots were switched out to match

the fraudulent totals which came from the ES&S, ADA, and Clerk Ballots
machines, none of which were certified for use in the State of Flordia.
554 of 982
555 of 982
556 of 982
557 of 982
558 of 982
559 of 982
560 of 982
561 of 982
562 of 982
563 of 982
564 of 982
565 of 982
6. 10% (60K) OF BROWARD COUNTY’S BALLOTS WERE BLANK DURING

THE 2022 GENERAL ELECTION CYCLE
566 of 982
567 of 982
7. SPREADSHEET DOCUMENTING SUMMARY REPORT TOTAL VIOLATIONS

OF FLA. STAT. 98.0981(2)(a); and EXAMPLES FROM MULTIPLE COUNTIES
OF OFFICIAL SUMMARY REPORT RESULTS SHOWING DASHES INSTEAD OF
WHOLE NUMBERS WITHIN CANDIDATE RACES OR BALLOT TYPES
TOTALING OVER 29 VOTES, WHICH VIOLATES FLA. STAT. 98.0981(2)(a)`
568 of 982
569 of 982
ALACHUA COUNTY – SUMMARY
570 of 982
571 of 982
572 of 982
573 of 982
574 of 982
575 of 982
576 of 982
577 of 982
578 of 982
579 of 982
BROWARD COUNTY – SUMMARY
580 of 982
581 of 982
582 of 982
CHARLOTTE COUNTY – SUMMARY
583 of 982
584 of 982
585 of 982
586 of 982
587 of 982
588 of 982
COLLIER COUNTY – SUMMARY
589 of 982
590 of 982
591 of 982
592 of 982
593 of 982
594 of 982
595 of 982
596 of 982
597 of 982
598 of 982
DESOTO COUNTY – SUMMARY

NO DETAILED RESULTS POSTED FOR ANY RACE WHICH VOIDS RESULTS
NO OFFICIAL RESULTS POSTED FOR ANY RACE WHICH VOIDS RESULTS
599 of 982
600 of 982
601 of 982
DUVAL COUNTY – SUMMARY
602 of 982
FLAGLER COUNTY – SUMMARY

NOTE THAT FLAGLER HAS CONCEALED THE DETAILED SUMMARY REPORT
MAKING ALL RACES ON THE ENTIRE BALLOT VOID WITH MORE THAN
1,354,378 SEPARATE VIOLATIONS OF FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a)
ALSO NOTE THAT THE PRECINCT-LEVEL AND REPORTS TABS ARE
CONCEALED, WHICH FURTHER CREATES AT LEAST AN ADDITIONAL
1,354,378 VIOLATIONS OF FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a)
TOTALING OVER 2,708,756 VIOLATIONS IN FLAGLER COUNTY ALONE
603 of 982
HENDRY COUNTY – SUMMARY
604 of 982
HERNANDO COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED – DASHES
605 of 982
606 of 982
607 of 982
608 of 982
609 of 982
610 of 982
611 of 982
612 of 982
613 of 982
HIGHLANDS COUNTY – SUMMARY
614 of 982
615 of 982
616 of 982
617 of 982
618 of 982
619 of 982
620 of 982
621 of 982
622 of 982
623 of 982
624 of 982
625 of 982
626 of 982
627 of 982
628 of 982
629 of 982
630 of 982
631 of 982
632 of 982
633 of 982
634 of 982
635 of 982
636 of 982
637 of 982
638 of 982
639 of 982
640 of 982
641 of 982
642 of 982
643 of 982
644 of 982
645 of 982
646 of 982
647 of 982
648 of 982
649 of 982
650 of 982
651 of 982
652 of 982
653 of 982
654 of 982
655 of 982
656 of 982
657 of 982
658 of 982
659 of 982
660 of 982
661 of 982
662 of 982
663 of 982
664 of 982
665 of 982
666 of 982
667 of 982
668 of 982
669 of 982
670 of 982
671 of 982
672 of 982
673 of 982
674 of 982
675 of 982
676 of 982
677 of 982
678 of 982
679 of 982
680 of 982
681 of 982
682 of 982
683 of 982
684 of 982
685 of 982
686 of 982
687 of 982
688 of 982
689 of 982
690 of 982
691 of 982
692 of 982
693 of 982
694 of 982
HOLMES COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED VIOLATION OF FLA STAT

98.0981(2)(a), 838.022(1)(b), 104.051(1,3&4), 895.03, FRAUD, WIRE
FRAUD & TREASON
695 of 982
696 of 982
697 of 982
LAKE COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED VIOLATION OF FLA STAT

98.0981(2)(a), 838.022(1)(b), 104.051(1,3&4), 895.03, FRAUD, WIRE
FRAUD & TREASON
698 of 982
699 of 982
700 of 982
701 of 982
702 of 982
JACKSON COUNTY – SUMMARY – NO DETAILED RESULTS SHOWN
703 of 982
LEON COUNTY – NO DETAILED RESULTS SHOWN
704 of 982
705 of 982
706 of 982
707 of 982
708 of 982
709 of 982
MANATEE COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED VIOLATION OF FLA STAT

98.0981(2)(a), 838.022(1)(b), 104.051(1,3&4), 895.03, FRAUD, WIRE
FRAUD & TREASON
710 of 982
711 of 982
MONROE COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED VIOLATION OF FLA STAT

98.0981(2)(a), 838.022(1)(b), 104.051(1,3&4), 895.03, FRAUD, WIRE
FRAUD & TREASON
712 of 982
Contest Candidate Issue Party ProvisionalMail Early Election Total % of

Votes Votes Votes Day Votes Total
Votes Votes
Representative in Congress Dist 28 Carlos A. Gimenez REP - - - - 20421 60.67

Representative in Congress Dist 28 Robert Asencio DEM - - - - 13183 39.17
Representative in Congress Dist 28 Write-in - - - - 53 0.16
United States Senator Marco Rubio REP - - - - 19897 58.54
United States Senator Val Demings DEM - - - - 13756 40.47
United States Senator Dennis Misigoy LPF - - - - 151 0.44
United States Senator Steven B. Grant NPA - - - - 107 0.31
United States Senator Tuan TQ Nguyen NPA - - - - 61 0.18
United States Senator Write-in - - - - 16 0.05
Governor and Lt Governor Ron DeSantis and Jeanette REP - - - - 20479 60.23
Nuñez
Governor and Lt Governor Charlie Crist and Karla DEM - - - - 13314 39.15
Hernandez
Governor and Lt Governor Hector Roos and Jerry "Tub" LPF - - - - 85 0.25
Rorabaugh
Governor and Lt Governor Carmen Jackie Gimenez and NPA - - - - 126 0.37
Kyle "KC" Gibson
Attorney General Ashley Moody REP - - - - 20428 61.04
Attorney General Aramis Ayala DEM - - - - 13037 38.96
Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis REP - - - - 20188 60.84
Chief Financial Officer Adam Hattersley DEM - - - - 12992 39.16
Commissioner of Agriculture Wilton Simpson REP - - - - 19946 60.05
Commissioner of Agriculture Naomi Esther Blemur DEM - - - - 13267 39.95
State Representative Dist 120 James "Jim" V. Mooney Jr REP - - - - 20403 61.07
State Representative Dist 120 Adam Gentle DEM - - - - 13005 38.93
Justice of the Supreme Court- Charles T Canady YES - - - - 18502 63.25
Justice of the Supreme Court- Charles T Canady NO - - - - 10750 36.75
Justice of the Supreme Court- John D Couriel YES - - - - 17924 61.85
713 of 982
OKEECHOBEE COUNTY – DASHES IN VIOLATION OF FLA STAT 98.0981(2)
714 of 982
(a)
715 of 982
716 of 982
717 of 982
718 of 982
719 of 982
720 of 982
721 of 982
722 of 982
723 of 982
724 of 982
725 of 982
726 of 982
727 of 982
728 of 982
ORANGE COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED RESULTS CONCEALED PER FLA

STAT 98.0981(2)(a), WHICH ACTIVATES 838.022(1)(b), 104.051(1,3&4),
895.03, FRAUD, WIRE FRAUD & TREASON
729 of 982
PINELLAS COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED RESULTS CONCEALED PER FLA

730 of 982
POLK COUNTY – SUMMARY – DASHES REPRESENTING WHOLE NUMBERS

OVER 29 VOTES IN VIOLATION OF PER FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a), WHICH
ACTIVATES 838.022(1)(b), 104.051(1,3&4), 895.03, FRAUD, WIRE FRAUD
& TREASON
731 of 982
PUTNAM COUNTY – DETAILED RESULTS – VIOLATIONS OF F.S. 98.0981(2)

(a)
732 of 982
733 of 982
734 of 982
735 of 982
SANTA ROSA – SUMMARY – VIOLATIONS OF FLA. STAT. 98.0981(2)(a)
736 of 982
737 of 982
738 of 982
739 of 982
740 of 982
741 of 982
742 of 982
743 of 982
744 of 982
745 of 982
ST LUCIE COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED VIEW CONCEALED WHICH

VIOLATES FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a), 838.022(1)(b), 104.051(1,3&4),
CREATES FRAUD AND IS AN ACT OF WIRE FRAUD
746 of 982
747 of 982
SUMTER COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED VIEW CONCEALED WHICH

CREATES FRAUD AND ACTS OF WIRE FRAUD
748 of 982
SUWANNEE COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED VIEW CONCEALED WHICH

CREATES FRAUD AND ACTS OF WIRE FRAUD
749 of 982
750 of 982
751 of 982
752 of 982
753 of 982
754 of 982
TAYLOR COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED RESULTS CONCEALED PER FLA

755 of 982
756 of 982
757 of 982
WAKULLA COUNTY – SUMMARY – DETAILED RESULTS CONCEALED PER FLA

758 of 982
8. SPREADSHEET DOCUMENTING PRECINCT-LEVEL REPORT TOTAL

VIOLATIONS OF FLA. STAT. 98.0981(2)(a); and EXAMPLES FROM MULTIPLE
COUNTIES OF OFFICIAL PRECINCT-LEVEL REPORT RESULTS SHOWING
DASHES INSTEAD OF WHOLE NUMBERS WITHIN CANDIDATE RACES OR
BALLOT TYPES TOTALING OVER 29 VOTES, WHICH VIOLATES FLA. STAT.
98.0981(2)(a)`
759 of 982
760 of 982
ALACHUA COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DASHES - DETAILED
761 of 982
762 of 982
763 of 982
764 of 982
765 of 982
766 of 982
BREVARD COUNTY - PRECINCT-LEVEL
767 of 982
DESOTO COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL RESULTS

NO DETAILED RESULTS POSTED WHICH VOIDS RESULTS
NO OFFICIAL RESULTS POSTED WHICH VOIDS RESULTS
768 of 982
DUVAL COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL
769 of 982
770 of 982
771 of 982
772 of 982
773 of 982
774 of 982
775 of 982
776 of 982
777 of 982
778 of 982
779 of 982
HARDEE COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DETAILED/DASHES/GOVERNOR RACE

NOTE: SHOWS NO PROVISIONAL VOTES FOR ENTIRE ELECTION CYCLE.
WHY IS THERE NO PROVISIONAL VOTE COUNT? IT’S MANDATORY.
780 of 982
HERNANDO COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DASHES – DETAILED
781 of 982
782 of 982
783 of 982
784 of 982
785 of 982
786 of 982
787 of 982
788 of 982
789 of 982
790 of 982
791 of 982
792 of 982
793 of 982
794 of 982
795 of 982
796 of 982
797 of 982
798 of 982
799 of 982
800 of 982
801 of 982
802 of 982
803 of 982
804 of 982
805 of 982
806 of 982
807 of 982
808 of 982
809 of 982
810 of 982
811 of 982
812 of 982
813 of 982
814 of 982
815 of 982
816 of 982
817 of 982
818 of 982
819 of 982
820 of 982
HIGHLANDS COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DETAILED – DASHES
821 of 982
822 of 982
823 of 982
824 of 982
825 of 982
826 of 982
ORANGE COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DETAILED RESULTS CONCEALED

PER FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a), WHICH ACTIVATES 838.022(1)(b),
104.051(1,3&4), 895.03, FRAUD, WIRE FRAUD & TREASON
827 of 982
PINELLAS COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DETAILED RESULTS CONCEALED

PER FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a), WHICH ACTIVATES 838.022(1)(b),
828 of 982
SANTA ROSA – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DETAILED VIOLATIONS OF FLA STAT

98.0981(2)(a)
829 of 982
830 of 982
831 of 982
832 of 982
833 of 982
834 of 982
835 of 982
836 of 982
837 of 982
838 of 982
839 of 982
840 of 982
841 of 982
842 of 982
843 of 982
844 of 982
SARASOTA COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DASHES REPRESENTING

DETAILED RESULTS OVER 29 IN VIOLATION OF FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a),
WHICH ACTIVATES 838.022(1)(b), 104.051(1,3&4), 895.03, FRAUD, WIRE
FRAUD & TREASON
845 of 982
846 of 982
847 of 982
848 of 982
849 of 982
850 of 982
851 of 982
852 of 982
853 of 982
854 of 982
855 of 982
856 of 982
857 of 982
ST. LUCIE COUNTY – ALL DETAILED PRECINCT-LEVEL RESULTS CONCEALED,

IN VIOLATION OF FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a), FLA STAT 828.022(1)(b), FLA
STAT 895.03, FLA STAT 102.051(1,3&4), FRAUD AND WIRE FRAUD
858 of 982
859 of 982
ST LUCIE COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DETAILED VIEW CONCEALED

WHICH VIOLATES FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a), 838.022(1)(b),
104.051(1,3&4), CREATES FRAUD AND IS AN ACT OF WIRE FRAUD
860 of 982
SUWANNEE COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DASHES INSTEAD OF WHOLE

NUMBERS IN MULTIPLE CATEGORIES OVER 29 VOTES, WHICH VIOLATES
FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a), 838.022(1)(b), 104.051(1,3&4), CREATES FRAUD
AND ACTS OF WIRE FRAUD
861 of 982
862 of 982
863 of 982
864 of 982
865 of 982
866 of 982
867 of 982
TAYLOR COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DETAILED RESULTS CONCEALED PER

FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a), WHICH ACTIVATES 838.022(1)(b),
868 of 982
869 of 982
870 of 982
WALTON COUNTY – PRECINCT-LEVEL – DASHES INSTEAD OF WHOLE

NUMBERS IN MULTIPLE CATEGORIES OVER 29 VOTES/PROVISIONAL
COLUMN REMOVED CONCEALING VOTES POSTED IN THE PROVISIONAL
COLUMN, WHICH VIOLATES FLA STAT 98.0981(2)(a), 838.022(1)(b),
104.051(1,3&4), CREATES FRAUD AND ACTS OF WIRE FRAUD
871 of 982
872 of 982
873 of 982
874 of 982
9. SPREADSHEET DOCUMENTING 153,588,992 SUMMARY AND PRECINCT-

LEVEL VIOLATIONS OF FLA. STAT. 98.0981(2)(a) DURING THE 2022
GENERAL ELECTION CYCLE
875 of 982
876 of 982
877 of 982
878 of 982
10. ALACHUA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ACCEPTANCE AND

TRANSFER OF ILLEGAL (ZUCKERBUCKS) FUNDS TO ALACHUA COUNTY
SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS 2022 BUDGET
879 of 982
ENCLOSURE 10a:
880 of 982
881 of 982
11. 26 FLORIDA COUNTIES ILLEGALLY USED CLEAR BALLOT AUDITING

PRODUCTS WHICH ARE NOT CERTIFIED FOR USE IN THE STATE OF
FLORIDA
26 COUNTIES SPECIFICALLY USED CLEAR BALLOT’S CLEAR COUNT WHICH

ALLOWS BALLOTS TO BE COUNTED REAL TIME. CLEAR BALLOT PRODUCTS
ARE NOT CERTIFIED (LEGAL) FOR USE, IN FLORIDA. NO BALLOTS, IN
FLORIDA, CAN BE COUNTED BEFORE THE THE POLLS CLOSE ON ELECTION
DAY. YET, 26 COUNTIES DID COUNT THE VOTES EARLY AND THEN
MANIPULATE THE RESULTS, WHICH DESANTIS, BYRD AND MATTHEWS
HAVE REFUSED TO REMEDY.
BECAUSE GOVERNOR DESANTIS, SECRETARY OF STATE CORD BYRD,
DIRECTOR OF ELECTIONS FOR THE DIVISION OF ELECTIONS MARIA
MATTHEWS AND 26 FLORIDA SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS VIOLATED THE
FLORIDA ELECTION CODE BY USING UNCERTIFIED REAL TIME BALLOT
COUNTING EQUIPMENT, THERE IS REASONABLE DOUBT THAT THE
ELECTIONS IN THOSE 26 COUNTIES REPRESENTED THE WILL OF THE
VOTERS, PLUS THERE WAS SUBSTANTIAL NONCOMPLIANCE WITH
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS, WHICH IN ACCORDANCE WITH FLORIDA LAW
MEANS THE ELECTION CYCLE NEEDS TO BE SET ASIDE AND HELD ANEW.
THE BELOW TWO IMAGES ONLY REPRESENT THE COUNTIES I HAVE BEEN
ABLE TO IDENTIFY AS USING CLEAR BALLOT. MARIA MATTHEWS,
DIRECTOR FOR THE DIVISION OF ELECTIONS HAS REFUSED TO DISCLOSE
THE COUNTIES USING CLEAR BALLOT. THE CLEAR BALLOT AGENT WHO
ADMITTED 26 COUNTIES, IN FLORIDA, USE CLEAR BALLOT, REFUSED TO
DISCLOSE THE COUNTIES. THEREFORE, FROM SEEING IT FIRSTHAND, IN A
COUNTY SUCH AS PALM BEACH COUNTY, BY WAY OF CLEAR BALLOT’S
WEBSITE OR PRESS RELEASES, I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO ASCERTAIN 8 OF
THE 35 COUNTIES USING CLEAR BALLOT’S REAL TIME REPORTING.
882 of 982
883 of 982
884 of 982
CLEAR BALLOT SPREADSHEET SHOWING THE 26 COUNTIES THAT USED

CLEAR BALLOT HARDWARE & SOFTWARE DURING THE 2022 ELECTION
CYCLE AND THE TOTAL BALLOTS CAST IN EACH OF THE COUNTIES THAT
USED THE UNCERTIFIABLE & UNAUTHORIZED CLEAR BALLOT PRODUCTS
885 of 982
886 of 982
887 of 982
888 of 982
889 of 982
TO ‘TABULATE’ IS TO ‘COUNT’. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE.
890 of 982
891 of 982
892 of 982
893 of 982
CLEAR BALLOT REAL TIME REPORTING IS NOT CERTIFIED FOR USE IN

FLORIDA, YET WAS USED IN 35 OF FLORIDA’S 67 COUNTIES DURING THE
2022 ELECTION CYCLE, WHICH VOID THE ELECTIONS IN EACH OF THOSE
35 COUNTIES DUE TO NONCOMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTE
894 of 982
UPDATE – AS OF OCT. 12, 2023, 26-OUT-OF-67 COUNTIES IN FLORIDA ARE

CURRENTLY USING THE UNCERTIFIED CLEAR BALLOT AUDIT MACHINES TO
VERIFY THEIR ELECTION RESULTS, WITH 9 ADDITIONAL COUNTIES
PLANNING ON USING CLEAR BALLOT DURING THE 2024 ELECTION CYCLE.
ACCORDING TO FLORIDA STATUTE, THESE MACHINES MAY NOT BE USED
SINCE THEY HAVE NOT BEEN CERTIFIED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA, NOR
ARE THE MACHINES CERTIFIABLE SINCE THEY GIVE REAL-TIME DATA AS
SOON AS THE BALLOT IS SENT THROUGH THE MACHINES AND THE
MACHINES ARE USED AS SOON AS VOTE-BY-MAIL BALLOTS ARE RECEIVED
AND THROUGHOUT THE ELECTION PROCESS.
NO COUNTY IN FLORIDA HAS ADMITTED TO USING CLEAR BALLOT, PER

THE OFFICIAL DOE RECORDS, WHICH MEANS EACH OF THE 35 COUNTIES
THAT USED CLEAR BALLOT APPEARS TO BE DOING SO CLANDESTINELY TO
HIDE THE ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES, WHICH VOIDS THE ELECTION IN EACH OF
THOSE 35 COUNTIES, WHICH DESANTIS, BYRD AND MATTHEWS HAVE
REFUSED TO TAKE ACTION ON
895 of 982
ACCORDING TO FLORIDA’S DIVISION OF ELECTIONS WEBSITE ONLY

DOMINION AND ES&S ARE CERTIFIED FOR USE, CLEAR BALLOT IS NOT
CERTIFIED NOR IS IT CERTIFIABLE SINCE IT CONNECTS DIRECTLY INTO
LAPTOPS WHICH ARE CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET AND IT IS USED
THROUGHOUT THE ELECTION CYCLE TO KEEP A RUNNING TOTAL OF
VOTES IN RACES, WHICH ELECTION OFFICIALS AND WORKERS CAN VIEW
ON THEIR SCREEN – THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF CLEAR BALLOT (SEE
IMAGES BELOW)
896 of 982
897 of 982
898 of 982
899 of 982
900 of 982
901 of 982
902 of 982
903 of 982
904 of 982
905 of 982
906 of 982
907 of 982
THE LAPTOP IS CONNECTED TO THE CLEAR BALLOT MACHINES HAVE
WIFI ACCESS. ELECTION (CLEAR BALLOT?) EMPLOYEES ILLEGALLY
OPEN SEALED PRECINCT-LEVEL BALLOT BOXES WHICH THEY THEN
CLANDESTINELY COUNT THROUGHOUT EARLY VOTING AND THEREBY
CALCULATING RUNNING TOTALS FOR EACH CANDIDATE AND
INITIATIVE, IN VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATUTE. THE SOFTWARE
USED IS CLEAR BALLOT’S CLEAR COUNT REAL TIME REPORTING.
908 of 982
909 of 982
910 of 982
911 of 982
912 of 982
913 of 982
914 of 982
915 of 982
916 of 982
917 of 982
918 of 982
COUNTING ALL THE EARLY VOTING BALLOTS THE DAY BEFORE ELECTION
DAY, EVEN THOUGH THE LAW SAYS NO BALLOTS CAN BE COUNTED UNTIL
THE POLLS CLOSE ON ELECTION DAY, WHICH WAS AUG. 23. 2022 – THESE
ACTIONS VOID PALM BEACH COUNTIES 2022 PRIMARY ELECTION CYCLE
919 of 982
920 of 982
921 of 982
922 of 982
923 of 982
924 of 982
925 of 982
926 of 982
927 of 982
928 of 982
929 of 982
930 of 982
931 of 982
932 of 982
933 of 982
ENCLOSURE 12. 49 COUNTIES USED FEDERALLY UNCERTIFIED ES&S

MACHINES WERE ILLEGALLY USED IN THE 2020 & 2022 ELECTION CYCLES
934 of 982
935 of 982
936 of 982
937 of 982
938 of 982
ENCLOSURE 13. 18 FLORIDA COUNTIES THAT USED CHINESE-OWNED

DOMINION EQUIPMENT DURING THE 2020 & 2022 ELECTION CYCLES
939 of 982
940 of 982
ENCLOSURE 14. DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC IS FOREIGN-OWNED,

PARTIALLY BY ENEMY OF THE STATE, CHINA Data Source: Scott’s 2020
Contest of Election & Exhibits (Case#2020CA2217, Leon County, FL – also
illegally closed by defendant/judge & rogue clerks, the latter of which
are statutorily obligated to keep a progress docket, per 28.211, the 2020
Contest of Election is still open, even if the clerks won’t post an accurate
docket)
941 of 982
942 of 982
943 of 982
944 of 982
ENCLOSURE 15. SUBSTANTIAL FOREIGN INTERFERENCE WITH FLORIDA

ELECTIONS BY ENEMY STATE, CHINA, WHICH UNLAWFULLY ACTED AS A
CONTRACTOR BY CONTRACTING DOMINION - CHINA’S WAR DOCTRINE
AGAINST THE US Data Source: Scott’s 2020 Contest of Election &
Exhibits (Case#2020CA2217, Leon County, FL – also illegally closed by
defendant/judge & rogue clerks, which means the 2020 case is still open)
945 of 982
946 of 982
947 of 982
948 of 982
949 of 982
950 of 982
951 of 982
952 of 982
953 of 982
954 of 982
955 of 982
956 of 982
957 of 982
958 of 982
959 of 982
960 of 982
961 of 982
962 of 982
963 of 982
964 of 982
965 of 982
966 of 982
967 of 982
968 of 982
969 of 982
970 of 982
971 of 982
972 of 982
973 of 982
974 of 982
ENCLOSURE 16. PROOF SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS FOR HILLSBOROUGH

COUNTY, CRAIG LATIMER, ILLEGALLY CERTIFIED THE COUNTY 2022
ELECTION CYCLE IN VIOLATION OF FLA. STAT. 98.0981(2)(a), WHICH
CONCEALED THAT THE VOTE COUNT THROUGHOUT THE RACES HAD BEEN
ALTERED
975 of 982
THE TOTALS YELLOW HIGHLIGHTED NUMBERS FOR CHARLIE CHRIST IN THE LEFT
COLUMN SHOULD BE REPRESENTED BY WHOLE NUMBERS IN THE COLUMN ON THE
RIGHT, BUT HAVE BEEN REPLACED BY DASHES IN VIOLATION OF STATUTE, WHEN
TO WHOLE NUMBER RESULTS ARE NOT SHOWN, AS IS REQUIRED, PER FLA STAT
98.0981(2)(a), IT ALLOWS FOR THE ALTERATION OF THE VOTE COUNT RELATING
TO ANY CANDIDATE RACE OR REFERENDUM, PARTICULARLY WHEN THE DOE HAS
VIOLATED FLA. STAT. 98.0981(1) BY REFUSING TO SHOW THE TOTAL NUMBER OF
REPUBLICANS, DEMOCRATS AND OTHERS, THAT VOTED FOR PARTICULAR
CANDIDATE AND REFERENDUMS, IN AT A PRECINCT-LEVEL, THROUGHOUT THE
976 of 982
STATE. IT BECOMES AN ORCHESTRATED COUP OR ATTEMPT AT OVERTHROWING

THE GOVERNMENT BY WAY OF ELECTION FRAUD
977 of 982
17. FSE MEMBERSHIP; FSE OFFICERS; FSE BOARD MEMBERS
978 of 982
979 of 982
980 of 982
981 of 982
982 of 982

Scott Vs Desantis Application 11th Circuit

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Scott Vs Desantis Application 11th Circuit

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

USCA11 Case: 23-13411 Document: 1-2 Date Filed: 10/17/2023 Page: 1 of 982

Associate Justice Clarence Thomas

RE: Emergency Application Regarding Election Fraud Affecting National

Court of Appeals Rule 23, and 11th Circuit Rule 2-1.

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2101(e), Rules 11 and 22 of the United States Supreme

the traditional route to arrive at the Supreme Court.

This case is based on an election plagued by over 3B statutory violations of fraud,

2023, Scott added necessarily added him.

overtaken, in Florida, amounting to no less than a coup by traitors from within

importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require

Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals Before Judgment.

particular case and order proceedings as it directs…’ and as is described in the

Florida8. Scott understands the Court’s obligation and commitment to uphold

matter of great urgency.

demonstrates a clear violation of Scott’s constitutional right to due process, to a

overthrow the Florida and US government by way of election fraud, both

compromised electronic election equipment9, compromised government officials,

reaching and demand prompt judicial review.

that her case meets the criteria, as described in detail below.

at stake necessitate immediate attention from this Honorable Court due to

our country and sovereigns14 survive this unconventional attack of war.

I. Introduction and Background

advocating for the defendants20, violating several Florida statutes, as well as

nomination or election or determining the result on any question submitted by

It is the duty of all officials whether legislative, judicial, executive,

Due to Judge Marsh’s newly acquired status as a defendant, he was without

prevent judges from dismissing election cases before heard26,necessarily voiding27

legally binding order at that stage of litigation.

26 In addition, A court should not dismiss a complaint “unless it appears beyond

unconstitutional hearing31, held in violation of Fla. Stat 102.168(6)32, which voids

Constitutions, as well as multiple Florida statutes33 (as described in detail within

31 An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties;

this application) and repeatedly refusing to disqualify himself34 upon receipt of

without jurisdiction or a proper hearing37, maliciously and in retaliation against

Scott, ruled her to be a vexatious litigant in an attempt to ensure Scott, an

afford an attorney; essentially attempting to block her contest of election - even

Florida’s Contest of Election statute forbids hearings to be granted for objections,

defenses or claims by defendants, if they failed to file an Answer within 10 days of

by then-Defendant Marsh, on May 18, 2023, were not authorized to be heard

34 Enclosure d1: Motions, Objections and Denials to Disqualify Judge Marsh

because 1) Attorney Schrieber filed an answer on behalf of Governor DeSantis,

complaint; 2) Attorney Ashley Davis who had no authority to represent Secretary

requirements as laid out in Fla. Stat. 102.168(6).

Due to the fact that:

1) neither motion was authorized to be heard because:

a) Secretary of State Byrd and Division of Elections Director of

Elections Matthews’ motion to dismiss was not filed ‘in an answer’,

which violated the mandate in Fla. Stat. 102.168(6), which means

they could not be granted a hearing for any objection, claim or

39 Enclosure g1: 1) Florida statute relating to attorney general’s duties; 2) Fla.

defense. A motion to remove Scott’s right to defend herself is a

motion stating a defense, claim and/or objection which was beyond

the authority of defendants Byrd and Matthews and the jurisdiction of

b) none of the three attorneys representing Byrd or Matthews (McVay,

Davis and Chappell) were authorized to represent state defendant,

since Florida’s Constitution assigned that duty to the Attorney

General, as is reaffirmed under the Attorney General’s duties (see Fla.

representation were received through embezzlement, which violates

Fla. Stat. 812.014, subsequently voiding the Byrd and Matthew’s

motion under the doctrine of unclean hands.

c) Byrd and Matthews motion falsely accusing Scott of being a

vexatious litigant was brought forth by Ashley Davis, an attorney

without legal authority to represent state defendants, and in such was