Introduction to Philosophy of the Human Person (PHI122)

PEER EVALUATION FORM (12 points)

Evaluator’s Name:
Activity Title: Program/Project Proposal
Date:
Level Production
Member’s Last Name Quality of Input Total
of Engagement of Output

Rubric for Peer-Assessment on Student Discussion

Exemplary Effective Minimal Unsatisfactory

Criteria Score
(4) (3) (2) (1)

The members The members are The members can The members refuse
are able to offer able to co contribute hardly contribute to contribute ideas
Quality
creative and relevant information ideas. This is due to for the adaptation of
of Input
substantial in analyzing the the lack of research the text.
information in text. and knowledge
analyzing the text. about the text.

The members The members The members The members do not

proactively contribute efficiently seldom contribute share any insights or
contribute to the to do the tasks. ideas to the group, ask questions. I am
Level of
group by offering However, there are rarely asks dependent on the
Engagement
ideas/asking instances where I questions, and ideas from the other
questions/voluntee am hesitant to share hardly do the tasks members of the
ring to do the tasks insights/ask given. group. I fail to do
given. questions. the tasks given.

The members The members carry The members The members only
responsibly carry out most of the tasks attempt to carry out carry out what they
out all tasks assigned to them by some of the tasks can from the tasks
Production assigned to them promptly assigned to them by assigned to them by
of Output by promptly submitting quality submitting their the group for the
submitting quality work as per work as per sake of simply
work as per discussed by the discussed by the submitting their
discussed by the group. group. work.
group.

Total Score:

AdZU SHS Peer and Self-Assessment on Student Discussion

School Year 2023-2024