Scientific Review

Form
1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Advanced Materials, and Mechatronics
Systems (AIAMMS-2023)
(NOVEMBER 3-4, 2023)
ORGANISED BY:
School of Engineering and Technology, JECRC University, Jaipur, India
Paper submission ID: 348
Paper title: Unleashing the Potential of Machine Learning: Revolutionizing Loan Forecasting Using Logistic Regression
Reviewer Name
Affiliation
Email address

1. The form below is intended to provide a structure to evaluating the article in terms of its scientific merit, and to minimize or eliminate the
major reasons for rejection through peer review. We have constructed the form to enable review of the article according to general structure.
Any additional comments outside of this form which the reviewer feels important should be added to the Additional Comments box at the end
of this form.
2. If any of the sections is not relevant to your review, please indicate in the relevant box following each question.

SECTIONAL QUESTION COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(Please comment properly, not just Yes/No)
TITLE & KEYWORDS Are the title and keywords appropriate Yes
to the content?
ABSTRACT Does the abstract adequately describe Yes
the paper, its main findings, and
conclusions?
INTRODUCTION Please provide minimum two comments To capture the reader's attention, consider starting with a compelling
to the authors that may improve the statistic, anecdote, or a thought-provoking question related to the role of
quality of the paper. capital in achieving life goals.
Focus on delivering key points in a more streamlined manner to

METHODS Please provide minimum two comments
to the authors that may improve the
quality of the paper.
RESULTS/OUTCOMES Please provide minimum two comments
to the authors that may improve the
quality of the paper.
DISCUSSION Please provide minimum two comments
to the authors that may improve the
quality of the paper.
CONCLUSIONS Please provide minimum one comment
to the authors that may improve the
quality of the paper.
maintain reader engagement.
Briefly describe the existing methodology also
Diagrammatic representation of the existing methodology .
Clearly define the specific research questions or problems you aim to
address with your proposed system.
Mention the comparision parameters in a tabular way on which existing
methodologies compared
Describe the results in Tabular comparison .
Describe the key components, architecture, and technologies used in
your platform. Providing a brief overview of the technical aspects can
help readers assess the feasibility and applicability of your system more
effectively.
Begin the conclusion by briefly reiterating the main objective of the
paper, which is to classify and inspect the nature of loan candidates.
This helps remind the reader of the paper's purpose.
While it's good to mention the accuracy rate (87.80%), it would be
helpful to provide some context. Is this accuracy rate considered high in
the context of similar studies or industry standards? Discuss the
significance of this accuracy rate.

REFERENCES & Are the citations and references Yes

CITATIONS relevant to the study?
Are there any important studies that NO
have not been cited?
Are any citations missing or any Yes
statements made which don't carry
appropriate citation?
Is the level of self-citation appropriate, Yes
given the context of the study and the
article length?
ADDITIONAL If relevant, please provide any No
COMMENTS additional comments or
recommendations to the authors not
covered by the responses above.
Overall Quality of the Very good, good, satisfying, poor, satisfying
Manuscript unacceptable
Language quality: Very good, good, satisfying, poor, Good
unacceptable
Is the paper technically Yes/No Yes
correct?
Are the methods, analysis Yes/No Yes
and arguments sound and
well controlled?