Scientific Review

Form
1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Advanced Materials, and Mechatronics
Systems (AIAMMS-2023)
(NOVEMBER 3-4, 2023)
ORGANISED BY:
School of Engineering and Technology, JECRC University, Jaipur, India
Paper submission ID: 355
Paper title: A Spectral-Spatial CapsNet (SSCNet) Based Framework for
Hyperspectral Image Classification
Reviewer Name Ritu Vashistha
Affiliation Chandigarh University
Email address Rituvashisth92@gmail.com

1. The form below is intended to provide a structure to evaluating the article in terms of its scientific merit, and to minimize or eliminate the
major reasons for rejection through peer review. We have constructed the form to enable review of the article according to general structure.
Any additional comments outside of this form which the reviewer feels important should be added to the Additional Comments box at the end
of this form.
2. If any of the sections is not relevant to your review, please indicate in the relevant box following each question.

SECTIONAL QUESTION COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(Please comment properly, not just Yes/No)
TITLE & KEYWORDS Are the title and keywords appropriate Yes
to the content?
ABSTRACT Does the abstract adequately describe Yes
the paper, its main findings, and
conclusions?
INTRODUCTION Please provide minimum two comments Start with a concise overview of hyperspectral image classification
to the authors that may improve the (HSIC) and its importance in various applications.
quality of the paper. Mention the challenges faced in HSIC, such as limited labeled training

METHODS Please provide minimum two comments
to the authors that may improve the
quality of the paper.
RESULTS/OUTCOMES Please provide minimum two comments
to the authors that may improve the
quality of the paper.
DISCUSSION Please provide minimum two comments
to the authors that may improve the
quality of the paper.
CONCLUSIONS Please provide minimum one comment
to the authors that may improve the
quality of the paper.
REFERENCES & Are the citations and references
CITATIONS relevant to the study?
Are there any important studies that
have not been cited?
Are any citations missing or any
statements made which don't carry
appropriate citation?
Is the level of self-citation appropriate,
given the context of the study and the
article length?
ADDITIONAL If relevant, please provide any
COMMENTS additional comments or
recommendations to the authors not
covered by the responses above.
Overall Quality of the Very good, good, satisfying, poor,
data, mixed pixels, and spectral variability.\
Discuss Briefly
Briefly describe the existing methodology used and Proposed method
developed .
Diagrammatic representation of the existing methodology .
Clearly define the specific research questions or problems you aim to
address with your proposed system.
Mention the comparision parameters in a tabular way on which existing
methodologies compared
Describe the results in Tabular comparison .
Describe the key components, architecture, and technologies used in
your platform. Providing a brief overview of the technical aspects can
help readers assess the feasibility and applicability of your system more
effectively.
Begin with a clear summary of the research objectives and what the
study aimed to achieve.
Mention the specific datasets and DL-based HSIC models used in the
study.
Highlight the challenges addressed in the research, such as the limited
number of training samples and the need for efficient spectral-spatial
feature extraction.
Explain the significance of overcoming these challenges.
Yes
NO
Yes
Yes
No
satisfying
Manuscript unacceptable
Language quality: Very good, good, satisfying, poor, Good
unacceptable
Is the paper technically Yes/No Yes
correct?
Are the methods, analysis Yes/No Yes
and arguments sound and
well controlled?