Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Enhancing Questionnaire Design: Theoretical
Perspectives on Capturing Attitudes and Beliefs in
Social Studies Research
Caroline Ochuko ALORDIAH1 and Juliet N. OSSAI2
Faculty of Education
University of Delta Agbor, Nigeria
1
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2917-9302
Abstract:- This theoretical paper explores the role of
theoretical perspectives in questionnaire design, aiming to
improve data quality and research outcomes in social
studies research. It examines the significance of
questionnaire design in understanding human behaviour
and decision-making, and its potential contributions to
research practices. The paper examines classical theories
like cognitive dissonance and contemporary models like
implicit attitudes, focusing on understanding belief systems
and their cognitive, social, and cultural influences. It also
discusses strategies for identifying relevant dimensions of
attitudes and beliefs and addressing response biases to
improve data accuracy. The paper also emphasizes the
linkage of theories to measurement constructs, ensuring
content validity by mapping theoretical concepts to
questionnaire items. Practical implications are
demonstrated through item wording, scale development,
and piloting. Ethical considerations, such as informed
consent, anonymity, and avoiding harm, are explored to
ensure participants' rights and well-being. Cultural and
contextual adaptation is also highlighted, as are appropriate
modes of administration to maximize response rates and
data quality. This theoretical analysis provides valuable
insights for psychometricians, researchers, and
psychologists in constructing questionnaires that effectively
capture attitudes and beliefs. By integrating theoretical
perspectives, researchers can enhance the validity and
reliability of their data, leading to a deeper understanding
of attitudes and beliefs in various research contexts. The
study also identifies future research directions and
innovations in questionnaire design methodologies to
continually improve attitude and belief measurement
practices.
Keywords:- Questionnaire Design, Attitudes, Beliefs,
Theoretical Perspectives, Data Quality, Research Outcomes,
Psychometrics.
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
I. INTRODUCTION
Questionnaire design is essential in the dynamic field of
social studies research nowadays for acquiring important
information and comprehending people's attitudes and opinions
(Centellegher et al., 2016). Due to their effectiveness,
scalability, and capacity to reach a sizable and diverse audience,
questionnaires are frequently employed as a method for data
collecting (Bee & Murdoch-Eaton, 2016). They provide
researchers with a methodical way to investigate diverse facets
of human behaviour, attitudes, and beliefs in a range of
circumstances (Schaffer et al., 2019). One cannot overestimate
the significance of using surveys to record attitudes and
opinions (Lundby et al., 2021). The essential building blocks of
human cognition are attitudes, which have an impact on social
relationships, behaviour, and decision-making (Pramanik ,
2016). Understanding attitudes and beliefs is necessary to
obtain understanding of a variety of subjects, including public
opinion, consumer behaviour, social identity, and psychological
well-being (Tudoran, 2019) Therefore, well-crafted surveys are
essential for illuminating these complex facets of human nature
(Braito et al., 2017). Despite being widely used, questionnaire
designs frequently run into problems that might undermine the
validity and accuracy of the data gathered. Response biases,
poorly written questions, and a lack of proper consideration of
theoretical viewpoints are some of these difficulties (Baird et
al., 2017). To make sure that their results are trustworthy and
reliable, researchers need to handle these restrictions.
The lack of adequate integration of theoretical viewpoints
in the design of the questionnaire in the context of attitudes and
beliefs may be the weakness of this study (Stone et al., 2018).
Although past studies on questionnaire design may have
existed, they may not have thoroughly examined how
theoretical frameworks might influence and enhance the
measurement of attitudes and beliefs (Aasdahl et al., 2020). By
offering a thorough investigation of various theoretical
viewpoints and their applications in questionnaire construction,
the study could attempt to close this gap and produce a more
honed and efficient method for gathering attitudes and beliefs
(Alordiah, 2023). The study may also fill a knowledge vacuum
about how theory-based questionnaire designs affect research
603
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
findings. Although there may be some study on the subject,
there may not be enough thorough case studies and examples to
show the success and advantages of using theory-driven
questionnaire designs (Byrne et al., 2019; Ridder et al., 2017).
This study can make a contribution by demonstrating how the
incorporation of theoretical viewpoints can produce data that is
more trustworthy, legitimate, and insightful, improving the
caliber and accuracy of research findings.
This article's main objective is to improve questionnaire
design by including theoretical viewpoints on identifying
attitudes and beliefs. To accomplish this goal, a thorough
theoretical analysis will be carried out to examine how various
theoretical frameworks influence and enhance questionnaire
formulation. This work intends to provide novel methods for
developing questionnaires that successfully evaluate attitudes
and beliefs by analysing and integrating various theoretical
views. This work has made a number of important advances in
the realm of questionnaire design. First off, it closes the gap
between theoretical conceptions and actual measurement by
highlighting the significance of theoretical perspectives.
Researchers can improve the content validity of their
instruments, making them more reliable and accurate in
assessing attitudes and beliefs, by matching questionnaire items
with pertinent theoretical concepts. Second, by addressing
current issues with questionnaire design, this study aims to
enhance the general data quality and research findings.
Researchers can improve the accuracy of their findings and the
reliability of their data by spotting and correcting response
biases and other design faults. The study's conclusions also
have application in a number of social studies research
domains. Improved questionnaire designs can result in more
informed decision-making and a greater understanding of
human behavior in fields ranging from marketing and public
opinion polling to psychology and sociology (Parascandola,
2017).
II. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORKS ON
ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS
A. Overview of Attitude Theories
The study explores a number of theoretical frameworks
that support the development and evaluation of attitudes. A
thorough grasp of attitudes is essential for creating efficient
questionnaires that effectively reflect people's attitudes and
beliefs.
 Classical Theories
The elaboration likelihood model and the cognitive
dissonance hypothesis are two well-known examples (ELM).
The cognitive dissonance theory, put out by Leon Festinger,
contends that people feel psychological discomfort when
confronted with opposing beliefs or attitudes. They are driven
to modify their attitudes or views in order to lessen this
dissonance. Researchers can create surveys that show
underlying conflicts in people's belief systems by using their
understanding of cognitive dissonance (Bolia – et al., 2016).
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Elaboration Likelihood Model ELM, a concept created by
Richard E. Petty and John T. Cacioppo, explains how people
digest persuasive communications and form opinions. It names
two processing paths: the inner route, which is analytical and
thoughtful, and the periphery way (relying on superficial cues).
Understanding how attitudes are generated and altered by
various processing mechanisms can be assessed with the help of
integrating the ELM into questionnaire design (Teng et al.,
2014).
 Contemporary Theories
The Dual-Process Models, according to dual-process
theories, attitudes are influenced by two different cognitive
processes, automatic and regulated. While regulated processes
require deliberate and conscious thought, automatic processes
are instinctive and reflexive. Researchers can account for both
the quick and reflective components of attitude formation by
taking dual-process models into consideration when designing
questionnaires (Mega et al., 2014). The Implicit Attitudes in
contrast to the explicit views reported in questionnaires,
implicit attitudes are those that exist outside of conscious
awareness. Specialized methods, such as implicit association
tests (IATs) or priming activities, are needed to measure
implicit attitudes. Beyond what people publicly declare,
incorporating implicit attitudes into questionnaire design allows
for a more thorough knowledge of people's beliefs (Hughes et
al., 2015).
B. Understanding Belief Systems
It is crucial to comprehend how beliefs are created and
influenced in order to create questionnaires that truly reflect
people's core ideas.
 Cognitive Theories of Belief Formation
According to cognitive theories, cognitive processes
including perception, memory, and reasoning serve as the
foundation for the construction of beliefs. These ideas
investigate how people form, arrange, and change their beliefs
(Gjoneska, 2021). The theories of information processing
describe how people assimilate new information and
incorporate it into their own worldviews. This factor is essential
to consider when designing a questionnaire because it enables
researchers to determine how respondents assimilate new
information when establishing opinions ( Rashid et al., 2021).
According to the schema hypothesis, people classify knowledge
into mental frameworks called schemas. These schemas have an
impact on the generation, storage, and retrieval of beliefs.
Taking into account schema theory can help when creating
questions that investigate how prior information affects the
formation of attitudes (Hunzaker & Valentino, 2019).
 Social and Cultural Influences on Belief Systems
Beliefs are not developed in isolation; social and cultural
settings have an impact on them (Ng et al., 2020). The
theoretical framework includes an examination of how societal
influences influence belief systems. Social identity theory, for
example, emphasizes how belonging to a group shapes one's
604
 Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
views and attitudes. Social categorization and ingroup partiality
are two ways that group identity might affect an individual's
ideas. Understanding social identity processes can improve the
design of surveys to gauge attitudes toward particular groups
(Ockenfels & Werner, 2014). Cultural Psychology: Cultural
psychology looks at how various civilizations' belief systems
are influenced by cultural norms, values, and practices. When
capturing opinions in varied groups, questionnaire design
guided by cultural psychology ensures that cultural nuances are
taken into consideration (Elvis, 2017).
III. ROLE OF THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES IN
QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN
 Linking Theories to Measurement Constructs
Researchers can make sure that the data they gather
appropriately reflects the respondents' underlying attitudes and
views by ensuring that the questionnaire items are in line with
pertinent theoretical notions (Vries et al., 2016). Researchers
must connect the theoretical ideas from the selected attitude and
belief theories to particular questionnaire items in order to
design a useful questionnaire (Guenolenet al., 2018). This
entails turning theoretical abstractions into precise, quantifiable
statements or queries. For instance, if the cognitive dissonance
theory is being applied, researchers may create questions on a
questionnaire to gauge respondents' judgments of the cognitive
conflicts they feel when confronted with particular
circumstances (Desmedt et al., 2021).
For a questionnaire to be successful, the content validity
must be high. Researchers can make sure that the questionnaire
items accurately represent the range of the attitude or belief
being researched by basing item selection on well-established
ideas (Epstein et al., 2019). The selection of items is more
likely to cover all pertinent construct dimensions when it is
theoretically grounded, leading to a thorough evaluation of the
phenomenon being studied (Pleitz et al., 2020).
 Identifying Relevant Dimensions of Attitudes and Beliefs
Beliefs and attitudes are multifaceted structures that can
include many different elements. A thorough understanding of
respondents' attitudes and beliefs requires acknowledging and
recording these various elements (Vita et al., 2020). Surveys
shouldn't confine themselves to evaluating attitudes and
opinions in a single dimension. Researchers can discover and
investigate different dimensions that make up the complex
character of attitudes and beliefs by drawing on a variety of
theoretical viewpoints (Vaala et al., 2014). For instance,
researchers may take into account factors like emotional
attachment, behavioural intentions, and the perceived
significance of conservation activities when studying attitudes
toward environmental issues (Wullenkord et al., 2020).
Researchers can use a variety of question formats and answer
scales to record nuanced responses. When respondents can
express their ideas and beliefs in their own words, open-ended
inquiries might yield deeper insights (Singer & Couper,
2017Using Likert scales with several response alternatives can
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
also enable respondents to express sentiments in subtler
gradations. By utilizing these techniques, questionnaire creators
can learn more complex and in-depth details about respondents'
opinions and attitudes (Simms et al., 2019).
 Addressing Response Biases
Response biases may unintentionally affect the results of
surveys' data collection. In order to ensure the accuracy and
dependability of the data, researchers need to be aware of these
biases and take action to reduce their impact (Latkin et al.,
2016). In contrast to social desirability bias, acquiescence bias
is the propensity for respondents to reply in a way they believe
to be socially acceptable, regardless of their real convictions.
By using balanced answer alternatives and randomized item
presentation to prevent habitual responding, researchers can
reduce these biases (Kuru & Pasek, 2016). Researchers can
create inquiries that compel respondents to explore many parts
of their attitudes and beliefs by adding theory-based response
forms (Salzberger et al., 2014). For instance, theory-driven
response forms can be designed to elicit answers that take
explicit and implicit attitudes into account, resulting in results
that give a more complete knowledge of the respondents'
perspectives (Elran-Barak & Bar-Anan, 2018).
 Designing Effective Questionnaires for Attitudes and Beliefs
Effective attitude and belief questionnaire design needs
careful consideration of item language and construction
(Archambault et al., 2014). To ensure that respondents
understand the questions being posed and that their answers are
accurate and meaningful, it is crucial to use clear and
unambiguous questions (Bee & Murdoch-Eaton, 2016;
Alordiah & Agbajor, 2014). Furthermore, it's critical to steer
clear of any prejudice or leading language that can
unintentionally affect respondents' responses. In order to get
people to respond with accurate information, questions must be
phrased clearly (Sullivan & Artino, 2017). Inconsistent or
erroneous answers could be given by respondents as a result of
ambiguous or complex wording (Weijters et al., 2017). To
ensure that each question accurately conveys the intended
meaning, researchers must utilize simple, understandable
language (Bee & Murdoch-Eaton, 2016). For example, when
assessing attitudes towards climate change, a clear question
could be: "Do you believe that human activities significantly
contribute to climate change?" (Motta et al., 2021). Leading
questions influence respondents to give a specific response,
whether consciously or unconsciously. It is possible for biased
language to quietly shape respondents' attitudes or elicit
socially acceptable responses. To eliminate bias and guarantee
that the answers of the questionnaire truly represent the
respondents' true opinions and beliefs, researchers must
maintain objectivity in their language (Krumpal, 2013).
For the purpose of accurately capturing attitudes and
beliefs, the scale construction and validation procedure is
essential. To guarantee the validity and reliability of the survey,
researchers must carefully choose the proper response scales
and apply rigorous validation procedures. To evaluate attitudes
605
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
and beliefs, various answer measures can be utilized, including
Likert scales and semantic differentials. For the purpose of
accurately capturing attitudes and beliefs, the scale construction
and validation procedure is essential (Coombes et al., 2021;
Alordiah, 2020). The suitable scale is chosen based on the study
goals and the constructs being assessed. For instance, Likert
scales give respondents a variety of ways to react, allowing
them to indicate different levels of agreement or disagreement
(Froman, 2014). Conversely, semantic differentials employ
polar adjectives to determine respondents' perceptions of a
certain proposition (Tamura et al., 2014). The measurement
provided by the questionnaire must be consistent and stable to
be considered reliable. Test-retest reliability and internal
consistency are two techniques used by researchers to evaluate
reliability (Beetsma et al., 2020). On the other hand, validity
guarantees that the survey correctly measures the targeted
constructs. To confirm the validity of the questionnaire,
researchers often evaluate construct validity, content validity,
and criterion validity (Phillips et al., 2019).
The questionnaire design process must include the
processes of piloting and pretesting the questionnaire. Before
using the questionnaire on a broader population, researchers can
find any potential problems with it by conducting a pilot study
with a small sample of participants ( Ra et al., 2021Pilot testing
is distributing the questionnaire to a small group of participants
and requesting input on the questions' clarity, the response
options' appropriateness, and the questionnaire's overall format
(Reeve et al., 2018). Researchers can uncover any perplexing or
troublesome items through pilot testing, making adjustments to
improve the quality and efficacy of the questionnaire (Read et
al., 2021). Responses from pilot participants offer insightful
information on the usability and efficacy of the questionnaire.
Researchers may get advice on how to make some items
clearer, how to phrase questions, or how to change the response
choices ( Lei & Lee, 2021). The questionnaire's general design
is improved by incorporating this feedback, which also raises
the chances of getting accurate data for the main study.
Effective attitude and belief questionnaire design requires
careful consideration of item wording, scale selection, and
validation (Song et al., 2015). Researchers can construct a
questionnaire that effectively captures respondents' attitudes
and views by paying attention to clarity, minimizing bias, and
carrying out extensive piloting, leading to more robust and
meaningful study conclusions (Artino et al., 2018).
 Ethical Considerations in Questionnaire Design
Making sure that participants give their informed consent
before participating in the research is one of the ethical
considerations in questionnaire design (Joolaee et al., 2017). In
order to get participants' voluntarily assent to participate in the
study, informed consent must be obtained by informing them of
its goals, methods, potential dangers, and benefits (Nijhawan et
al., 2013). In order to ensure that participants completely
understand what their participation entails, researchers must
ensure that the research's objective and procedures are
communicated in a clear and understandable manner. Included
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
in this are the goals of the study, the type of the questionnaire,
how the data is collected, and any dangers that might be present
(Moody et al., 2017). Additional precautions are required to
guarantee informed consent for some vulnerable populations,
such as children or people with cognitive disabilities. In these
circumstances, researchers may request legal guardians'
permission or use plain language and visual aids to make their
findings easier to understand (Franca et al., 2016).
The confidentiality and privacy of participants must be
respected at all costs when designing a questionnaire.
Researchers must take precautions to safeguard participant
identities and response confidentiality (Ceylan & Cetinkaya,
2020). Any identifiable information that could be used to
connect participants to their responses should be avoided by
researchers. To protect their privacy, participants should instead
be given anonymous codes or identities. Researchers must use
data security techniques to protect participant data (Sanz et al.,
2022). This entails the use of secure data storage systems,
access restriction to only authorized personnel, and encryption
of sensitive data.
In order to prevent participants from suffering damage or
discomfort while filling out the questionnaire, researchers must
take precautions. This requires being aware of touchy subjects
and the potential emotional impact the questionnaire may have
on respondents. To prevent participants from suffering
emotional or psychological harm, researchers should carefully
assess the questionnaire's content. Approaching questions that
can bring up upsetting memories or bad feelings requires
prudence. Occasionally, despite safety precautions, people may
feel uncomfortable answering the questionnaire (Hayakawa et
al., 2022). If participants require help or debriefing sessions,
researchers should be ready to provide them. It can also be
useful to include contact details for support services. Ethical
considerations in questionnaire design are essential to protect
participants' rights and well-being (Ashini et al., 2021).
 Cultural and Contextual Adaptation
Given that attitudes and views can differ across many
cultural contexts, cultural sensitivity is an essential component
of questionnaire design. To guarantee that the questionnaire is
pertinent, considerate, and well-received by participants from
varied cultural backgrounds, researchers must be conscious of
cultural variations (Kanaan et al., 2020). Because of the
influence of their values, conventions, and traditions, various
cultures frequently have distinctive perspectives on attitudes
and beliefs (Alordiah et al., 2022). These cultural differences
should be taken into account by researchers, who should also
think about how they might affect how questionnaire items and
replies are interpreted (Moghaddam-Banaem et al., 2017).
Researchers may need to modify the questionnaire to make it
more relevant to the target population's particular cultural
environment in order to achieve cultural appropriateness. This
may entail rephrasing inquiries, utilizing examples that are
culturally appropriate, or adding regional idioms and
terminology (Kanaan et al., 2020).
606
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
When designing questionnaires, language is crucial,
especially when there are participants who speak multiple
languages (Köroğlu, 2019). Maintaining the questionnaire's
validity and reliability across linguistic groups depends on
accurate translation. Researchers must make sure that each
item's meaning and aim are consistent while translating the
questionnaire from one language to another (Ningrum et al.,
2019). Consideration and collaboration with bilingual experts
are essential because direct translation may not capture the full
depth of some subjects (Kaka et al., 2014). Pilot testing is done
by researchers with individuals who speak the target language
group to evaluate the quality of the translated questionnaire.
The input from the pilot participants aids in identifying any
problems with comprehension, cultural relevance, or parity
between the original and translated versions (Kanaan et al.,
2020). Enhancing the validity and reliability of the
questionnaire across varied populations requires cultural and
contextual adaptation (Lundby et al., 2021). Researchers may
make sure the questionnaire is suitable, inclusive, and produces
meaningful data across many cultural settings by being
culturally sensitive and appreciating the influence of cultural
factors on attitudes and views (Balante et al., 2021). The
questionnaire's integrity must also be preserved, and
comprehensive translation and piloting of translated versions
are essential to guarantee that the research collects correct data
from participants who speak different languages ( Roux et al.,
2021).
 Implementation and Data Collection
Important choices must be made during the
implementation phase of questionnaire design involving
participant recruitment and the choice of an acceptable sample
from the target group ( Rashid et al., 2021). To make sure the
data collected truly reflects the relevant attitudes and beliefs,
researchers must carefully take these factors into account.
Researchers identify the target demographic they want to study
before beginning data collecting. The features and requirements
that participants must meet in order to be eligible for the study
are described in this step. After defining the target population,
researchers choose the most appropriate sampling techniques to
obtain a representative sample of that population (Ameen &
Praharaj, 2020). The selection of a sampling technique (such as
random sampling or stratified sampling) depends on the goals
of the research and the resources that are available (Pathman et
al., 2018). If particular subgroups of the target population are
either underrepresented or overrepresented in the sample,
sampling bias may result. Researchers should be conscious of
such biases and take corrective action if necessary (Lamb &
Kwok, 2015). Additionally, non-response problems, in which
chosen participants fail to complete the questionnaire, can
impact the sample's representativeness. It is crucial to have
tactics in place to boost participation and lower non-response
rates in order to increase the study's validity (Hillyer et al.,
2020).
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Selecting the most appropriate method of questionnaire
administration is a crucial factor to take into account throughout
the implementation phase. Response rates, participant
involvement, and the caliber of the data gathered can all be
affected by the administration method. There are several ways
that researchers might distribute questionnaires, including
internet surveys, print surveys, and in-person interviews (Mauz
et al., 2018). The choice will rely on elements including the
research setting, the target population, and the available
resources. Each modality has benefits and drawbacks.
Participant response rates and the caliber of the data collected
might be affected by the administration method. For instance,
face-to-face interviews may provide in-depth responses but can
be time- and resource-intensive, while internet surveys may
reach a wider audience but may be prone to response biases
(Wilson, 2021). Researchers should carefully consider these
variables and select the mode that best supports their goals
while ensuring high data quality. Researchers need to pay close
attention to specifics during the implementation and data
collection phases because they could affect the study's validity
and reliability (Mittal et al., 2020). To accurately reflect the
target population, the sampling and recruitment procedures
must be well thought out (Wardropper et al., 2021).
Additionally, choosing the right administration mode improves
data quality and response rates. Researchers can increase the
overall validity and influence of their study on attitudes and
beliefs by carefully considering these areas ( Hooten & Bruse,
2017).
 Analysing and Interpreting Questionnaire Data
The analysis and interpretation of the responses is the
most important phase once the data from the questionnaires has
been gathered. To make relevant inferences and conclusions
from quantitative data on attitudes and beliefs, researchers
frequently use a variety of statistical techniques. Utilizing
statistical methods to compile and analyse numerical data
gathered through surveys is known as quantitative analysis ( Ali
& Bhaskar, 2016). Researchers can summarize the major
tendencies and response variability using descriptive statistics.
Additionally, depending on the sample data, inferential
statistics can be used to draw conclusions about the wider
population (Kaur et al., 2017).
A foundation for comprehending the underlying constructs
being tested by the questionnaire is provided by theoretical
perspectives on attitudes and beliefs (Malmi et al., 2020).
Researchers analyze the quantitative findings considering these
theoretical frameworks throughout the data analysis stage. They
get more understanding of the elements influencing attitudes
and views as well as how they coincide with or conflict with
accepted ideas as a result of doing this (Becchimanzi et al.,
2021).
607
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
In addition to quantitative information, questionnaires
may also contain open-ended questions that let respondents
comment on their answers. Researchers utilize thematic
analysis for such qualitative data to investigate and extrapolate
motifs, topics, and meaning from the participant tales (Al-
Yateem et al., 2022). The content of the open-ended responses
are systematically coded and categorized as part of the
qualitative research technique known as thematic analysis
(Bellows-Riecken et al., 2013). A greater knowledge of the
intricacies and complexity of attitudes and beliefs is provided
by the researchers' identification of recurrent themes and
patterns in the responses of the participants (McLean et al.,
2018). Thematic analysis allows for a rich exploration of
participants' perspectives beyond the constraints of closed-
ended questions (Woods et al., 2015).
Integrating both qualitative and quantitative data can yield
a more comprehensive understanding of attitudes and beliefs
(Reichman et al., 2021By juxtaposing the outcomes of the
quantitative analysis with the themes that emerge from the
qualitative data, researchers can triangulate their findings. This
mixed-methods strategy improves the study's robustness and
enables a more comprehensive interpretation of the findings
(Mataka & Kowalske, 2015). A crucial step in the research
process involves analysing and interpreting questionnaire data
in order to get useful findings and insights from the replies
received (Monticone et al., 2020). While qualitative analysis
focuses on the variety and depth of participant viewpoints,
quantitative analysis helps researchers to identify statistical
linkages and patterns (Petrofsky et al., 2023).
IV. LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Although theoretical viewpoints offer insightful advice,
they do have some limitations. The difficulty of generalizing
results to varied groups is one constraint, as is the simplifying
of complicated psychological processes and the potential for
researcher bias when choosing theoretical frameworks
(Howerton-Fox et al., 2022). The complexity of attitudes and
beliefs may not be fully captured by some theoretical
viewpoints, leaving gaps in the questionnaire's ability to fully
evaluate people's thought processes and motivations (McCann
et al., 2017). Therefore, in order to minimize potential biases
and limits, researchers and psychometricians should thoroughly
assess the strengths and shortcomings of the selected theoretical
frameworks (Gorman & Kashner, 2017). There are
methodological limitations that could affect the research
outcomes. These may include challenges related to sample
representativeness, non-response bias, or the reliability and
validity of the data collected (Lewis et al., 2013).
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
We suggest a number of potential future study directions
to advance the discipline of questionnaire design and attitude
research:
 Psychological theories are constantly changing; thus
researchers should investigate and incorporate new
theoretical stances into questionnaire design.
 Interdisciplinary partnerships that include expertise from
psychology, sociology, anthropology, and other related
subjects might be beneficial to questionnaire design.
 Researchers should investigate cutting-edge data collection
techniques as technology develops, including mobile apps,
wearable technology, and virtual reality simulations.
 Understanding how attitudes evolve and remain stable over
time can be learned by conducting longitudinal research.
 Researchers should concentrate on creating contextually
suitable, culturally sensitive questionnaires for various
populations given the diversity of cultures and societies.
This makes sure that the questions are applicable and
meaningful to people from all different cultural
backgrounds.
 Implications of this study to psychometricians, researchers,
and psychologist
This study has important ramifications for psychologists,
academics, and psychometricians since it sheds light on how to
improve questionnaire designs to better capture attitudes and
beliefs. The following are some practical and theoretical
ramifications of the study's findings that could be advantageous
to these professionals:
 The theoretical viewpoints offered in this work can be used
by psychometricians to create more reliable and accurate
questionnaires.
 The research's emphasis on cutting-edge theories and
multidisciplinary viewpoints may encourage
psychometricians to investigate novel assessment models
and procedures. This could lead to the creation of cutting-
edge psychometric tools that are compatible with our
growing understanding of attitudes and beliefs.
 Researchers can create surveys that successfully capture
attitudes and beliefs by using the theoretical ideas from this
study. Higher data dependability and quality may result
from this, enhancing the empirical basis for research
findings.
 Researchers can choose the instrument that best fits their
research objectives and target population by comparing and
analyzing current surveys utilizing theoretical frameworks.
 Understanding the importance of cultural sensitivity and
language translation in questionnaire design is useful for
psychologists.
 In the questionnaire design process, the study emphasizes
the value of informed consent, anonymity, and limiting
harm. Survey administration can be done ethically by
psychologists to safeguard the rights and welfare of
participants.
608
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
 The investigation of various theoretical frameworks in the
study promotes interaction between psychologists,
researchers, and psychometricians.
 The study's display of effective questionnaire designs gives
practitioners from various sectors a resource to share
experiences and adopt best practices.
 More theory-driven research in the area of attitudes and
beliefs is encouraged by emphasizing the role of theoretical
viewpoints in questionnaire design. As a result, underlying
mechanisms may be better understood, and evidence-based
therapies may be developed.
 The study's suggestions for future research areas stimulate
additional inquiries into the methodology used in
questionnaire design, resulting in continual developments in
the measuring of attitudes and beliefs.
V. CONCLUSION
This study investigates the significance of using
theoretical frameworks in the creation of questionnaires and
their uses in social studies research. The knowledge gathered
from this study can be applied to questionnaire design since
stronger and more accurate questionnaires can be made by tying
theoretical ideas to measuring constructs. Researchers can
collect nuanced replies and develop a thorough knowledge of
people's cognitive processes by comprehending the
multifaceted features of attitudes and beliefs. Data from
questionnaires become more accurate and dependable by
addressing response biases through theory-based response
forms. A wide range of research fields, including psychology,
sociology, marketing, and public policy, can benefit from these
theoretical advances. Better questionnaire design improves data
quality and enriches how study findings are interpreted. In
order to make better decisions and implement successful
interventions, researchers can better understand the underlying
mechanisms that shape attitudes and beliefs. Understanding
human attitudes and beliefs requires the use of theoretical
viewpoints in the creation of questionnaires. Researchers can
open new doors for understanding human attitudes and beliefs
by constantly improving and inventing. By integrating
interdisciplinary viewpoints, utilizing technology, and adopting
cultural sensitivity, questionnaire instruments can be made to be
more contextually relevant and impactful, benefiting not only
attitude and belief research but also the field of social studies as
a whole.
REFERENCES
[1]. Aasdahl, L., Marchand, G., Gismervik, S., Myhre, K.,
Fimland, M., & Røe, C. (2020). The Fear Avoidance
Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ): Does it really measure
fear beliefs?. Spine.
https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003188
[2]. Alordiah, C. O. (2023). Mind the gap: exploring effective
strategies for conducting gap analysis in educational
studies. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education,
7(1), 1-14
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[3]. Alordiah, C. O., Omumu, F., Owamah, H. I., Chenube, O.,
Okokoyo, I. E., Osagiede, M. A., & Agbajor, H. T. (2022).
Socio-cultural norms encouraging violence against women
(VAW) from a popular ethnic group in the Niger Delta
region of Nigeria and the roles of schools in preventing
VAW. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1).
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2102299
[4]. Ali, Z., & Bhaskar, S. B. (2016). Basic statistical tools in
research and data analysis. Indian Journal of
Anaesthesia, 60(9), 662–662.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.190623
[5]. Alordiah, C. O. (2020). Development and factorial
validation of a well-being scale for the Nigerian child.
Journal of the Nigerian Council of Educational
Psychologists, 13(1), 1-12.
[6]. Alordiah, C. O., & Agbajor, H. T. (2014). Bias in test
items and implication for national development. Journal
of Education and Practice, 5(9), 10-13.
[7]. Al-Yateem, N., Rossiter, R., Subu, M. A., Slewa-Younan,
S., Rahman, S. M., Dias, J. M., & Al-Marzouqi, A.
(2022). A qualitative exploration of mental health
knowledge among pediatric health professionals in the
United Arab Emirates. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0266224–
e0266224.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.02662
24
[8]. Ameen, S., & Praharaj, S. K. (2020). Problems in using
WhatsApp groups for survey research. Indian Journal of
Psychiatry, 62(3), 327–327.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.indianjps
ychiatry_321_20
[9]. Archambault, P., Gagnon, S., Gagnon, M.-P., Turcotte, S.,
Lapointe, J., Fleet, R., Côté, M., Beaupré, P., Sage, N. L.,
& Émond, M. (2014). Development and Validation of
Questionnaires Exploring Health Care Professionals’
Intention to Use Wiki-Based Reminders to Promote Best
Practices in Trauma. JMIR Research Protocols.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.3762
[10]. Artino, A. R., Durning, S. J., & Sklar, D. P. (2018).
Guidelines for Reporting Survey-Based Research
Submitted to Academic Medicine. Academic
Medicine, 93(3), 337–340.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.000000000000
2094
[11]. Ashini, A., Alsoufi, A., & Elhadi, M. (2021). Parental
perception of neonatal ICU visitation during the COVID‐
19 pandemic. International Journal of Gynaecology and
Obstetrics, 153(3), 554–555.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13650
[12]. Becchimanzi, C., Iacono, E., & Brischetto, A.
(2022). Acceptability of Assistive Robotics by Older
Adults: Results from a Human-Centred Qualitative Study.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001637
[13]. Baird, B., Lucas, R., & Donnellan, M. (2017). The Role of
Response Styles in the Assessment of Intraindividual
Personality Variability.. Journal of research in personality,
69,
609
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
[14]. 170-179
[15]. . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.015
[16]. Balante, J., van den Broek, D., & White, K. M. (2021).
Mixed‐methods systematic review: Cultural attitudes,
beliefs and practices of internationally educated nurses
towards end‐of‐life care in the context of cancer. Journal
of Advanced Nursing, 77(9), 3618–3629.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14814
[17]. Bee, D., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2016). Questionnaire
design: the good, the bad and the pitfalls. Archives of
Disease in Childhood-Education and Practice
Edition, 101(4), 210–212.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-
309450
[18]. Beetsma, A. J., Reezigt, R., Paap, D., & Reneman, M. F.
(2020). Assessing future health care practitioners’
knowledge and attitudes of musculoskeletal pain;
development and measurement properties of a new
questionnaire. 50, 102236–102236.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2020.10223
6 1782/20162015245
[19]. Bellows-Riecken, K. H., Mark, R., & Rhodes, R. E.
(2013). Qualitative elicitation of affective beliefs related
to physical activity. Psychology of Sport and
Exercise, 14(5), 786–792.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.0
4.002
[20]. Braito, M., Böck, K., Flint, C., Muhar, A., Muhar, S., &
Penker, M. (2017). Human-Nature Relationships and
Linkages to Environmental Behaviour. Environmental
Values, 26, 365-389.
https://doi.org/10.3197/096327117X14913285800706
[21]. Centellegher, S., Nadai, M., Caraviello, M., Leonardi, C.,
Vescovi, M., Ramadian, Y., Oliver, N., Pianesi, F.,
Pentland, A., Antonelli, F., & Lepri, B. (2016). The
Mobile Territorial Lab: a multilayered and dynamic view
on parents’ daily lives. EPJ Data Science, 5, 1-19.
https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0064-6
[22]. Ceylan, S. S., & Çetinkaya, B. (2020). Attitudes towards
gossip and patient privacy among paediatric
nurses. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 289–300.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019845124
[23]. Coombes, L., Bristowe, K., Ellis-Smith, C., Aworinde, J.,
Fraser, L. K., Downing, J. R., Bluebond-Langner, M.,
Chambers, L. W., Murtagh, F., & Harding, R. (2021).
Enhancing validity, reliability and participation in self-
reported health outcome measurement for children and
young people: a systematic review of recall period,
response scale format, and administration
modality. Quality of Life Research, 30(7), 1803–1832.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02814-
4 attitudes and beliefs about cancer clinical trial
[24]. Desmedt, O., Heeren, A., Corneille, O., & Luminet, O.
(2021). What do measures of self-report interoception
measure? Insights from a systematic review, latent factor
analysis, and network approach. Biological Psychology,
169. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8mpz9
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[25]. Elran-Barak, R., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2018). Implicit and
explicit anti-fat bias: The role of weight-related attitudes
and beliefs. Social Science & Medicine, 204, 117–124.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03
.018
[26]. Elvis, H. J. J. (2017). The Influence of Indigenous Culture
on Sport Psychology Practice: Challenges and
Prospects. Psychology and Behavioral Science
International Journal, 7(4).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19080/pbsij.2017.07.5557
19
[27]. Epstein, A., Williams, K., Reddihough, D., Murphy, N.,
Leonard, H., Whitehouse, A., Jacoby, P., & Downs, J.
(2019). Content validation of the Quality of Life
Inventory-Disability.. Child: care, health and
development. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12691
[28]. Franca, M. C., Smith, L. B., Nichols, J., & Balan, D. S.
(2016). Culturally diverse attitudes and beliefs of students
majoring in speech-language pathology. CoDAS, 28(5),
533–545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-
[29]. Froman, R. D. (2014). The Ins and Outs of Self-Report
Response Options and Scales. Research in Nursing &
Health, 37(6), 447–451.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21626
[30]. Gjoneska, B. (2021). Conspiratorial Beliefs and Cognitive
Styles: An Integrated Look on Analytic Thinking, Critical
Thinking, and Scientific Reasoning in Relation to
(Dis)trust in Conspiracy Theories. Frontiers in
Psychology, 12.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736838
[31]. Gorman, D., & Kashner, T. M. (2017). Medical
Graduates, Truthful and Useful Analytics With Big Data,
and the Art of Persuasion. Academic Medicine, 93(8),
1113–1116.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.000000000000
2109
[32]. Guenole, N., Brown, A., & Cooper, A. (2018). Forced-
Choice Assessment of Work-Related Maladaptive
Personality Traits: Preliminary Evidence From an
Application of Thurstonian Item Response Modeling.
Assessment, 25, 513 - 526.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116641181.
[33]. Hayakawa, S., Pan, Y., & Marian, V. (2022). Language
changes medical judgments and beliefs. International
Journal of Bilingualism, 26(1), 104–121.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006921102285
1
[34]. Hillyer, G. C., Beauchemin, M., Hershman, D. L., Kelsen,
M. A., Brogan, F. L., Sandoval, R., Schmitt, K. M., Reyes,
A., Terry, M. B., & Lassman, A. B. (2020). Discordant
participation between physicians, research staff, and
cancer patients. Clinical Trials, 17(2), 184–194.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774520901514
610
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
[35]. Hooten, W. M., & Bruce, B. K. (2017). Beliefs and
attitudes about prescribing opioids among healthcare
providers seeking continuing medical education. Journal
of Opioid Management, 7(6), 417–424.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2011.0082
[36]. Howerton-Fox, A., Veyvoda, M. A., & Montgomery, J. L.
(2022). The Effect of a Graduate Course in Cued Speech
on Students’ Perspectives: A Pilot Study. Perspectives of
the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1–7.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_persp-21-
00183
[37]. Hughes, J. (2015). Support for the domain specificity of
implicit beliefs about persons, intelligence, and morality.
Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 195-203.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2015.05.042
[38]. Hunzaker, M. B. F., & Valentino, L. (2019). Mapping
Cultural Schemas: From Theory to Method. American
Sociological Review, 84(5), 950–981.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419875638
[39]. Joolaee, S., Faghanipour, S., & Hajibabaee, F. (2017). The
quality of obtaining surgical informed consent. Nursing
Ethics, 24(2), 167–176.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733015584398
[40]. Kaka, B., Ogwumike, O. O., Idowu, O. A., Odole, A. C.,
Saidu, A. M., Fawole, H. O., & Ibrahim, M. (2014).
Translation of the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
Into Hausa Language. Global Journal of Health
Science, 7(3).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v7n3p116
[41]. Kanaan, S. F., Khraise, H., Almhdawi, K. A., Darlow, B.,
Oteir, A. O., & Mansour, Z. M. (2021). Arabic version of
the Back Pain Attitudes Questionnaire: Translation, cross-
cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties. Journal
of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 34(1), 59–67.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3233/bmr-191758
[42]. Kaur, P., Stoltzfus, J., & Yellapu, V. (2018). Descriptive
statistics. International Journal of Academic
Medicine, 4(1), 60–60.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam_7_18
[43]. Köroğlu, Z. Ç. (2019). Interventionist Dynamic
Assessment’s Effects on Speaking Skills Testing: Case of
Elt Teacher Candidates. Advances in Language and
Literary Studies, 10(3), 23–23.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.3p.2
3 and entrepreneurial beliefs. International Journal of
[44]. Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability
bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Quality &
Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9
[45]. Kuru, O., & Pasek, J. (2016). Improving social media
measurement in surveys: Avoiding acquiescence bias in
Facebook research. Comput. Hum. Behav., 57, 82-92.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.12.008
[46]. Lamb, S. W., & Kwok, K. C. S. (2015). MSSQ-Short
Norms May Underestimate Highly Susceptible
Individuals. 57(4), 622–633.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814555862
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[47]. Latkin, C., Mai, N., Ha, T., Sripaipan, T., Zelaya, C.,
Minh, N., Morales, G., & Go, V. (2016). Social
Desirability Response Bias and Other Factors That May
Influence Self-Reports of Substance Use and HIV Risk
Behaviors: A Qualitative Study of Drug Users in
Vietnam.. AIDS education and prevention : official
publication of the International Society for AIDS
Education, 28 5, 417-425
[48]. Lei, F., & Lee, E. E. (2021). Cross-Cultural Modification
Strategies for Instruments Measuring Health Beliefs About
Cancer Screening: Systematic Review. 7(4), e28393–
e28393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/28393
[49]. Lewis, E. A., Hardy, M., & Snaith, B. (2013). An analysis
of survey reporting in the imaging professions: Is the issue
of non-response bias being adequately
addressed? Radiography, 19(3), 240–245.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2013.02.003
[50]. https://doi.org/10.1521/AEAP.2016.28.5.417
[51]. Lundby, C., Simonsen, T., Ryg, J., Søndergaard, J.,
Pottegård, A., & Lauridsen, H. H. (2021). Translation,
cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Danish
version of the revised Patients’ Attitudes Towards
Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire: Version for older
people with limited life expectancy. Research in Social &
Administrative Pharmacy, 17(8), 1444–1452.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.11.0
01
[52]. Malmi, L., Sheard, J., Kinnunen, P., Simon, & Sinclair, J.
(2020). Theories and Models of Emotions, Attitudes, and
Self-Efficacy in the Context of Programming Education.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3372782.3406279
[53]. Mataka, L. M., & Kowalske, M. G. (2015). The influence
of PBL on students’ self-efficacy beliefs in
chemistry. Chemistry Education. Research and
Practice, 16(4), 929–938.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/c5rp00099h
[54]. Mauz, E., von der Lippe, E., Allen, J. D., Schilling, R.,
Müters, S., Hoebel, J., Schmich, P., Wetzstein, M.,
Kamtsiuris, P., & Lange, C. (2018). Mixing modes in a
population-based interview survey: comparison of a
sequential and a concurrent mixed-mode design for public
health research. Archives of Public Health, 76(1).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-017-0237-1
[55]. McCann, B. T. (2017). Prior exposure to entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 23(3), 591–612.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-05-2016-0160
[56]. McLean, S. G., Goode, N., Hulme, A., Dodd, K., Gorman,
A. D., Solomon, C., & Salmon, P. M. (2019). Beyond the
Tip of the Iceberg: Using Systems Archetypes to
Understand Common and Recurring Issues in Sports
Coaching. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 1.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2019.00049
611
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
[57]. Mega, L. F., & Volz, K. G. (2014). Thinking about
thinking: implications of the introspective error for
default-interventionist type models of dual
processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00864
[58]. Mittal, N., & Alavi, S. (2020). Construction and
psychometric analysis of teachers mobile learning
acceptance questionnaire. Interactive Technology and
Smart Education, 17(2), 171–196.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-07-2019-0039
[59]. Moghaddam-Banaem, L., Ahmadi, F., Kazemnejad, A., &
Abbaspoor, Z. (2017). Development of a questionnaire to
measure attitude toward birth method selection. Iranian
Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 22(2), 147–
147.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_147_15
[60]. Moody, G., & Lugg, F. (2017). Public understanding of,
and attitudes towards, data linkage in
research. International Journal for Population Data
Science.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v1i1.92
[61]. Monticone, M., Frigau, L., Vernon, H., Rocca, B.,
Giordano, A., Vullo, S. L., Mola, F., & Franchignoni, F.
(2020). Reliability, responsiveness and minimal clinically
important difference of the two Fear Avoidance and
Beliefs Questionnaire scales in Italian subjects with
chronic low back pain undergoing multidisciplinary
rehabilitation. European Journal of Physical and
Rehabilitation Medicine, 56(5).
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23736/s1973-
9087.20.06158-4
[62]. Motta, M. (2021). Changing Minds or Changing Samples?
Disentangling Microlevel Stability and Macrolevel
Growth in Anthropogenic Climate Change
Beliefs. International Journal of Public Opinion
Research, 33(2), 477–489.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa020
[63]. Ng, W. K., Shaban, R. Z., & van de Mortel, T. F. (2020).
Hand hygiene beliefs and behaviours about alcohol-based
hand rub use: Questionnaire development, piloting and
validation. Infection, Disease and Health, 25(1), 43–49.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2019.10.001
[64]. Nijhawan, L. P., Janodia, M. D., Muddukrishna, B., Bhat,
K. U., Bairy, K., Udupa, N., & Musmade, P. B.
(2013). Informed consent: Issues and challenges. 4(3),
134–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-
4040.116779
[65]. Ningrum, E. H., Evans, S. E., & Soh, S.-E. (2019).
Validation of the Indonesian version of the Safety
Attitudes Questionnaire: A Rasch analysis. PLOS
ONE, 14(4), e0215128–e0215128.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.02151
28
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[66]. Ockenfels, A., & Werner, P. (2014). Beliefs and ingroup
favoritism. Journal of Economic Behavior and
Organization, 108, 453–462.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.12.003
[67]. Parascandola, M. (2018). Public Opinion, Public Policy,
and Smoking: The Transformation of American Attitudes
and Cigarette Use, 1890–2016 by Thomas R.
Marshall. Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 92(1), 215–
217.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.2018.0014
[68]. Pathman A, BD, A., WM, Z., Mohd S, Sukeri S, TJ, T.,
RA, H., Osman, M. B., Norazlin, & Zawaha. (2018).
Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Health Beliefs
toward Leptospirosis among Urban and Rural
Communities in Northeastern Malaysia. International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health, 15(11), 2425–2425.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112425
[69]. Petrofsky, L. A., Heffernan, C. M., Gregg, B. T., Smith-
Forbes, E. V., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2023). Sleep and
Military Leaders: Examining the Values, Beliefs, and
Quality of Sleep and the Impact on Occupational
Performance. Military Medicine.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usad040
[70]. Phillips, J., Prunuske, J., Fitzpatrick, L., & Mavis, B.
(2019). The Family Medicine Attitudes Questionnaire: A
Valid Instrument to Assess Student Attitudes Toward
Family Medicine. Family Medicine.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22454/fammed.2019.957
692
[71]. Pleitz, M. (2020). Paradox as a Guide to Ground.
Philosophy, 95, 185 - 209.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819120000078
[72]. Pramanik, A. (2016). Decision Making: A Core Problem
of Social Cognition. International Journal of Indian
Psychology.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25215/0302.025
[73]. Ra, A.-T., Moussa, Anwar, S., Ha, A.-S., & Sharma, P.
(2021). Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and practices of the
population in Kuwait about AIDS-a pilot study. Eastern
Mediterranean Health Journal, 1(2), 235–240.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26719/1995.1.2.235
[74]. Rashid, A. S. K., Tout, K., & Yakan, A. C. (2021). The
critical human behavior factors and their impact on
knowledge management system–cycles. Business Process
Management Journal, 27(6), 1677–1702.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-11-2020-0508
[75]. Rashid, A. S. K., Tout, K., & Yakan, A. C. (2021). The
critical human behavior factors and their impact on
knowledge management system–cycles. Business Process
Management Journal, 27(6), 1677–1702.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-11-2020-0508
612
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023
[76]. Read, S. T., Wynaden, D., Albrecht, M. A., & Toye, C.
(2021). Development of the dementia community attitudes
questionnaire. Dementia, 20(6), 1940–1957.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301220977649
[77]. Reeve, E., Anthony, A. C., O’Donnell, L. K., Low, L.-F.,
Ogle, S. J., Glendenning, J. E., Lorang, C. E. B., &
Hilmer, S. N. (2018). Development and pilot testing of the
revised Patients’ Attitudes Towards Deprescribing
questionnaire for people with cognitive
impairment. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 37(4),
E150–E154.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.12576
[78]. Reichman, M., Bakhshaie, J., Grunberg, V. A., Doorley, J.
D., & Vranceanu, A.-M. (2021). What Are Orthopaedic
Healthcare Professionals’ Attitudes Toward Addressing
Patient Psychosocial Factors? A Mixed-Methods
Investigation. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related
Research, 480(2), 248–262.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.000000000000
2043
[79]. Ridder, H. (2017). The theory contribution of case study
research designs. Business Research, 10, 281-305.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S40685-017-0045-Z
[80]. Roux, B., Sirois, C., Niquille, A., Spinewine, A., Ouellet,
N., Pétein, C., Sibille, F.-X., Csajka, C., Reeve, E., &
Villeneuve, C. (2021). Cross-cultural adaptation and
psychometric validation of the revised Patients’ Attitudes
Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in
French. 17(8), 1453–1462.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.11.0
04
[81]. Salzberger, T., Newton, F., & Ewing, M. (2014).
Detecting gender item bias and differential manifest
response behavior: A Rasch-based solution. Journal of
Business Research, 67, 598-607.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2013.02.045.
[82]. Sanz, T. R. V., Casero, A. G., González, Y., Albaladejo,
J., Hanlon, L. F. M., & Llamas, M. A. (2022). Opinions of
nurses regarding Euthanasia and Medically Assisted
Suicide. Nursing Ethics, 29(7–8), 1721–1738.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733022110994
0 [94]. Wilson, S. (2021). To mix or not to mix: Parental attitudes
[83]. Schaffer, D. R., & Debb, S. M. (2019). Validation of the
Online Security Behaviors and Beliefs Questionnaire with
College Students in the United States. Cyberpsychology,
Behavior, and Social Networking, 22(12), 766–770.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0248
[84]. Simms, L., Zelazny, K., Williams, T., & Bernstein, L.
(2019). Does the Number of Response Options Matter?
Psychometric Perspectives Using Personality
Questionnaire Data. Psychological Assessment, 31, 557–
566. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000648
[85]. Singer, E., & Couper, M. (2017). Some Methodological
Uses of Responses to Open Questions and Other Verbatim
Comments in Quantitative Surveys. , 11, 20.
https://doi.org/10.12758/MDA.2017.01
IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[86]. Stone, A., McDermott, M., Abdi, A., Cornwell, B.,
Matyas, Z., Reed, R., & Watt, R. (2018). Development
and validation of the multi-dimensional questionnaire of
scientifically unsubstantiated beliefs. Personality and
Individual Differences.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAID.2018.02.024
[87]. Sullivan, G. M., & Artino, A. R. (2017). How to Create a
Bad Survey Instrument. Journal of Graduate Medical
Education, 9(4), 411–415.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-17-00375.1
[88]. Tamura, N., Terashita, T., & Ogasawara, K. (2014).
Development of an Attitude-measurement Questionnaire
Using the Semantic Differential Technique: Defining the
Attitudes of Radiological Technology Students toward X-
ray Examination. Japanese Journal of Radiological
Technology, 70(3), 206–212.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2014_jsrt_70.3.1
35
[89]. Teng, S., Khong, K., & Goh, W. (2014). Conceptualizing
Persuasive Messages Using ELM in Social Media. Journal
of Internet Commerce, 13, 65 - 87.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2014.910729
[90]. Tudoran, A. A. (2019). Why do internet consumers block
ads? New evidence from consumer opinion mining and
sentiment analysis. Internet Research, 29(1), 144–166.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-06-2017-0221
[91]. Vaala, S. (2014). The Nature and Predictive Value of
Mothers' Beliefs Regarding Infants' and Toddlers'
TV/Video Viewing: Applying the Integrative Model of
Behavioral Prediction. Media Psychology, 17, 282 - 310.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.872995
[92]. Vita, G., Strano, A., Maesano, G., Via, G., & D’Amico,
M. (2020). The Role of Individual Knowledge in
Functional Olive Oil Preferences: Does Self-Coherence
Lead to Different Health Attributes Perception?. Foods, 9.
https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101428
[93]. Vries, R., Realo, A., & Allik, J. (2016). Using Personality
Item Characteristics to Predict Single–Item Internal
Reliability, Retest Reliability, and Self–Other Agreement.
European Journal of Personality, 30, 618 - 636.
https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2083
towards translanguaging and language management
choices. International Journal of Bilingualism, 25(1), 58–
76.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920909902
[95]. Weijters, B., Puntoni, S., & Baumgartner, H. (2017).
Methodological Issues in Cross-Linguistic and
Multilingual Advertising Research. Journal of
Advertising, 46, 115 - 128.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1180656
[96]. Wardropper, C. B., Dietsch, A. M., Goebel, M. S., &
Martin, V. J. (2021). Conducting conservation social
science surveys online. Conservation Biology, 35(5),
1650–1658.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13747
613
Volume 8, Issue 10, October – 2023 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
[97]. Woods, A., Jones, N., Alderson-Day, B., Callard, F., &
Fernyhough, C. (2015). Experiences of hearing voices:
analysis of a novel phenomenological survey. The Lancet
Psychiatry, 2(4), 323–331.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-
0366(15)00006-1
[98]. Wullenkord, M., Heidbreder, L., & Reese, G. (2020).
Reactions to Environmental Changes: Place Attachment
Predicts Interest in Earth Observation Data. Frontiers in
Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01442

IJISRT23OCT368 www.ijisrt.com 614