Email: kishandatta@yahoo.com Mobile: 9841341094 PREDICTION AND EVALUATION TECHNIQUES AND TOOLS Baseline Data:
Baselinerefers to the collection of background
information on the biophysical, social, and economic settings of the proposed area.
Normally, information is obtained from
secondary sources, or the acquisition of new information through field samplings, interviews, surveys, and consultations. Baseline information is required for all types of EAs to facilitate identification, prediction and evaluation of the environmental impacts so as to avoid, mitigate or compensate adverse impacts on the resources of the project and its surrounding areas. Base line data is collected for two main purposes:
Toprovide a description of the status and trends of
environmental factors of the host area against which predicted changes can be compared and evaluated in terms of significance;
Toprovide means of detecting actual change, once a
project is initiated. Impact predictions are made against a ‘ baseline’ established by the existing environment (or by its future state).
Known as baseline studies, the collection of data on relevant
biophysical , social, and economic aspects provides a reference point against which the characteristics and parameters of impact-related changes are analyzed and evaluated.
The description of the affected environment includes the
characteristics of the area in which the proposed project activities during construction and operation will take place >>>>>>>>it should cover the study area (area within all effects and impacts would occur, and potential compensations and rehabilitation efforts would be made) Environmental Aspects:
setting, gender issues, infrastructure, institution, education, community resources, economic characteristics, health, sanitation, cultural resources and practices, agricultural practices. Impact prediction is a technical exercise
It utilizes physical, biological, socio-economic and
cultural data to estimate the likely characteristics and parameters of impacts (e.g. magnitude, spatial occurrence, etc)
Prediction helps to know what will happen on
the environmental resources during and after the project implementation >>>> provides opportunities to select and design cost effective and appropriate mitigation measures and cause least damage to environmental resources. Qualitative prediction is based on expert judgment while the quantitative rely on mathematical models and other techniques.
Impact prediction considers the following aspects:
1) Magnitude of the Impacts
2) Extent of the Impacts
3) Duration of the Impacts
Methods of Impact Prediction: 1) Mathematical Models: These are based on cause and effect relationship usually expressed in the form of mathematical functions. These include simple input output as well as complex dynamic models a) Deterministic Model: normally used to predict socio-economic impacts such as the economic multiplier after money is injected into the project area, and the response of local economy.
b) Stochastic Models: They are probabilistic. Predictions depend on
the probability that a number of events will occur in a given area and time. 2: Statistical Models: Statistical models such as regression and component analysis are sometimes used to indicate the relationship between data and the test hypothesis. Predictions of flood frequencies, fro example, may use statistical models.
3. Geographic Information System:
Satellite images, physical maps and aerial photographs provide information on existing resources. GIS techniques can be used to predict the impacts of a development project as they allow for analyzing the effects of project activities on the resources present in the project area. 4.Field and Laboratory Experimental Methods Inventory ; Laboratory test
5. Biological Methods
6. Socio-economic Methods
7. Expert Judgment
8. Case Studies Impact Evaluation :
Impact evaluation provides useful information to
decision makers for selecting appropriate choice. Once impact is identified and predicted ,it is necessary to evaluate them in terms of their significance, or non- significance.
Impact evaluation should duly consider the national
policies, acts and rules, strategies, standards, guidelines, international commitments and so on.
It should also consider public concerns, negative social
impacts and scientific and professional evidences such as on resource use, ecological damage, etc. Significant criteria should be used throughout the different stages of EA process. Some criteria to determine adverse impacts include: Loss of rare, endangered and/or endemic species; extent of habitat destruction, depletion or fragmentation ; Reduction in diversity of species, and importance of ecological functions such as distribution of food chains; Loss of critical or productive habitats; Severe disturbance to pristine ecosystem and its ecological sustainability; Change in land use and natural landscapes and loss of current use of land; Displacement of families affected by the project activities Pressure on social service facilities and loss of valued ( prime land) areas; Toxicity impacts on human health; Reduction in the capacity of renewable resources to meet the needs of present and future generations. In case of beneficial impacts, the following criteria could also be used during the evaluation of their significance:
Impacts that generate socio-economic benefits such as
employment, income and reduce poverty without depleting the natural resource base;
Impacts that address women, disadvantage group, marginalised
people or special target group Methods of Impact Evaluation: 1) Consultation with Experts and Stakeholders 2) Delphi Method 3) Use of Numerical Values 4) Consideration of Policies, Laws, and Local Customs 5) Consideration of Standards 6) Environmental Evaluation System 7) Impact Presentation