Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ADMS 1000 - Session 4 Slides
ADMS 1000 - Session 4 Slides
ADMS 1000 - Session 4 Slides
MANAGEMENT
York University - ADMS 1000
Jason Yarmolinsky
Learning Goals
• These forces can either independently or jointly affect the attractiveness of the industry
5 Forces Model – Threat of New Entrants
Entrants bring new competition, desire to gain market share, and substantial
resources and capabilities.
Incumbents need to consider how to create entry barriers to deter potential
new entrants:
Economies of Scale - spreading the costs of production over the number of units
produced
Capital Requirements - the threat of new entrants is reduced as the level of
required capital increases.
Switching Costs - the costs (monetary or psychological) associated with changing
from one supplier to another from the buyer perspective.
Access to distribution channels
Cost disadvantages independent of scale (i.e Government contracts/regulation)
5 Forces Model – Bargaining Power of
Suppliers
Suppliers can exert bargaining power over incumbents in an industry by
demanding better prices or threatening to reduce quality of purchased goods
or services
Their Power depends on:
the criticality of resources the suppliers hold to the incumbents (the more critical,
the more power suppliers hold)
the number of suppliers available relative to the number of incumbents in an
industry. (The less suppliers, the more power individual suppliers hold)
5 Forces Model - Bargaining Power of Buyers
All firms in an industry often compete with other firms in different industries,
where the firms provide substitute products or services with similar purposes.
Remember– the substitute products/services don’t have to be identical– they just
have to solve the same problem
Consider the impact of technology and consumer preferences
AirBnB and Hotels
Uber and Taxis
Online Stores versus Physical Retail Stores
5 Forces Model – Rivalry Among Existing
Firms
Lack of differentiation or switching costs
Numerous or equally balanced competitors
High exit barriers
Limitations of the 5 Forces Model
The model does not explicitly take roles of technological change and
governmental regulations into consideration. Specifically, it does not address
how technological change and governmental regulations affect the power
relationships between forces.
The focus of this model is primarily on the power relationships between each
force at a given point of time. As such, it may have limited implications for
future strategic decision-making.
The model assumes that all incumbents experience the same power
relationship with each force. However, incumbents differ in terms of their
resources and firm size, which can give them more or less power in
influencing their suppliers or customers.
Analyzing the Internal Environment
suggests that managers need to look inside of their firms for competitive
advantage. In order for a firm to achieve high performance, managers need to
look at the resources and capabilities of their firm and ask four important
questions:
1. The question of value (V)
2. The question of rareness (R)
3. The question of imitability (I)
4. The question of organization (O)
VRIO model - The question of value (V)
Do the firms’ resources and capabilities add any value to capture market
share or to enhance profitability, either through exploiting emerging
opportunities or by neutralizing threats.
Some firms do have such resources and capabilities.
Consider products, brand etc.
VRIO model - The question of rareness
(R)
Assess if an organization’s valuable resources and capabilities are unique
among its competitors
Consider: technology, patents, unique elements
VRIO model - The question of imitability
(I)
Valuable and rare resources and capabilities can provide firms with
competitive advantage; however, how long the advantage lasts depends upon
how quickly imitation could occur
Patents expire. First mover’s advantages only last as long as it takes someone to
follow…
VRIO model - The question of
Organization (O)
Can the firm be organized in effective and efficient ways to exploit their
valuable, rare, and difficult to imitate resources and capabilities to maximize
their potentials.
Having the other elements without the ability to structure the organization
effectively will lead to downfall
Consider companies with good products/services that have failed.
VRIO Model in Practise
A particular set of In favor of the In favor of the In favor of the In favor of the firm Sustainable
resources and firm firm firm competitive
capabilities advantage
A particular set of In favor of the In favor of the Not in favor of In favor of the firm Temporal
resources and firm firm the firm competitive
capabilities advantage
A particular set of In favor of the Not in favor of In favor of the In favor of the Temporal
resources and firm the firm firm firm competitive
capabilities advantage
If any of the answers to these questions are not in favour of the firms, then the firms would
only have temporal advantage over their competitors.
SWOT Analysis
Business Level
Each business unit in a diversified firm chooses a business-level strategy
as its means of competing in individual product markets.
Corporate Level
Specifies actions taken by the firm to gain a competitive advantage by selecting and
managing a group of different businesses competing in several industries and product
markets.
Business Level Strategy
Generic Strategies
Strategic alliances refer to two or more than two firms or organizations working together to
achieve certain common goals.
Major forms
Non-equity alliances (Longos and Starbucks)
Equity alliances (Microsoft and Facebook)
Joint Ventures (Libra cryptocurrency– Facebook and financial institutions)
strategic alliances provide firms with quick access to new resources and capabilities
contributed by alliance partners.
strategic alliances can be less costly and less resource commitment.
Firms also share risk associated with diversification with alliance partners.
On the other hand, firms will have to share potential revenue or profits with alliance
partners.
There are some specific risks associated with strategic alliances, the partner selection in
particular
Case – A & W