Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 65

PROJECT MANAGEMENT: PLANNING, EXECUTION,

EVALUATION AND CONTROL


Prof. Sanjib Chowdhury

EL
Vinod Gupta School of Management

PT
IIT Kharagpur

N
Module 04: Defining the Project
Lecture 09: Responsibility Matrices and Project Communication Plan
Concepts Covered:
• Defining the Project Scope
• Establishing Project Priorities
• Creating the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)
• Integrating the WBS with the Organization

EL
• Coding the WBS for the Information System

PT
• Responsibility Matrices

N
• Project Communication Plan
Integrating WBS with the Organization (Step 4) Illustrative

EL
Source: Project Management, Gray and Larson

PT
N
Coding WBS for Information System (Step 5) Illustrative

• WBS Coding System


‒ Defines levels, elements,
budget, cost info,

EL
consolidation of report

PT
N
PBS for Software Development Project

EL
PT
N
Source: Project Management, Gray and Larson
 What is a Responsibility Matrix? Illustrative

Responsibility Matrix for a Market Research Project

EL
PT
Source: Project Management, Gray and Larson
N
RACI Matrix Illustrative
• Responsible: Those who do the work to achieve the
task or deliverable
Project Project
Executive Steering Project • Accountable: Also known as the Approver: the one
Deliverable Sponsor Group Manager Project Team
ultimately accountable for the Project deliverables
Project charter A C R I and completion; the one who signs it off
Stakeholder workshops: agenda and • Consulted: Those whose opinions are sought and
presentation C C A R
with whom there is two-way communication

EL
• Informed: Those who are kept updated on progress,
Results of stakeholder workshops I I A R

PT
often on completion of the task or deliverable, and
Results of project voting C C A R with whom there is only one-way communication

N
Strategy table of contents I A R I

Strategy drafts C A R I

Strategy final version A C R I

Communications plan A C R I

Project management products I A R I


Project Communication Plan

 What’s the purpose?


‒ What to communicate?
‒ Whom to communicate?

EL
(what, who, how, when: info?)

PT
N
 Developing a Communication Plan

1. Stakeholder analysis
2. Information needs
‒ status report, milestone report, scope changes,
deliverable issues, change request, Team meeting,

EL
action items, Gating decision

PT
3. Sources of information

N
4. Dissemination modes
5. Responsibility and timing
Stakeholder Communications

EL
PT
N
Source: Project Management, Gray and Larson
Shale Oil Research Project Communication Plan Illustrative

EL
PT
N
Source: Project Management, Gray and Larson
Conclusion:
• In continuation with the last lecture, this class discusses the remaining steps in
defining the project, namely, (iv) integrating WBS with the organization, and (v) coding
WBS for the information system.
• It further explains process breakdown structure (PBS), which is often used for process-

EL
based projects with ill-defined deliverables. It is generally used for the software
projects.

PT
• Furthermore, the need for responsibility/RACI matrix, the importance of stakeholder

N
analysis and developing project communication plan for the success of the project
have been elucidated.
References:
1. Project Management – The Managerial Process, Gray, C.F., Larson, E.W., and
Joshi, R., McGraw Hill Education, 8th edition.
2. Project Management – Achieving Competitive Advantage, Jeffrey K. Pinto, Pearson
Publishing Ltd., 5th edition.

EL
3. Successful Project Management, Gido, J. and Clements, J.P., Cengage Learning,

PT
6th edition.
4. Project Management: A Managerial Approach, Meredith, J.R. and Mantel, S.J.,

N
Wiley, PMBOK Guidelines Book
N
PT
EL
PROJECT MANAGEMENT: PLANNING, EXECUTION,
EVALUATION AND CONTROL
Prof. Sanjib Chowdhury

EL
Vinod Gupta School of Management

PT
IIT Kharagpur

N
Module 05. Estimating Project Time and Cost
Lecture 10: Estimating Guidelines and Methods, Top-down Estimation
Concepts Covered:
• Factors influencing the quality of estimates
• Estimating guidelines for time, cost and resource
• Top-down versus bottom-up estimation

EL
• Methods for estimating project time and cost
• Level of detail

PT
• Types of costs

N
• Refining estimates

Project Management
Estimating Projects
• What is Estimating?

• Why estimating Time and Cost are important?


(support decision, schedule work, develop budget, cash flow needs, check
progress)

EL
PT
• Types of Estimates

N
• Top-down vs. Bottom-up Estimates
Conditions for Top-Down/Bottom-up Estimates
Top-down Bottom-up
Condition Estimates Estimates
Strategic decision making X
Cost and time important X

EL
High uncertainty X

PT
Internal, small project X
Fixed-price contract X

N
Customer wants details X
Unstable scope X

Source: Project Management, Gray and Larson


Factors Influencing Quality of Estimates

Planning Horizon

Other (Non-project)
Project
Factors (equip b/d, vac.,
Duration (new tech)
N/holidays)

EL
PT
Quality of Estimates
Organization
People

N
Culture

Project Structure and


Padding
Org.(matrix, dedicated
Estimates
team)
Guidelines for Work Package Estimates – time, cost, resources

People with familiarity

Risk assessment Several people

EL
PT
Preparing Initial
Estimates

N
Contingencies Normal conditions

Independent task Time units


• What is the preferred approach for estimating time and cost?
‒ Top-down  WBS/OBS  Bottom-up  Schedule and budget 
Reconcile

EL
• Top-down Approach for Estimating Project Times and Costs

PT
• Consensus methods
• Ratio methods

N
• Apportion method
• Function point methods
• Learning curves
Apportion Method of Allocating Project Costs using WBS

EL
PT
N
Source: Project Management, Gray and Larson
Conclusion:
• This chapter deals with estimation of project time and cost. There are mainly
two types of approaches for estimating project times and costs, namely, (1)
Top-down approach such as (i) consensus methods, (ii) ratio methods, (iii)
apportion method, (iv) function point methods for software and system

EL
projects, and (v) learning curves; (2) Bottom-up approach such as (i)
template methods, (ii) parametric procedures applied to specific tasks, (iii)

PT
range estimates for the WBS work packages, and (iv) phase estimating: a
hybrid method. Top-down estimation/approach has been explained in detail.

N
References:
1. Project Management – The Managerial Process, Gray, C.F., Larson, E.W., and
Joshi, R., McGraw Hill Education, 8th edition.
2. Project Management – Achieving Competitive Advantage, Jeffrey K. Pinto, Pearson
Publishing Ltd., 5th edition.

EL
3. Project Management: A Managerial Approach, Meredith, J.R. and Mantel, S.J.,
Wiley, PMBOK Guidelines Book

PT
4. Project Management for Business and Technology – Principles and Practice, John

N
M. Nicholas, Prentice-Hall of India Ltd.
N
PT
EL
PROJECT MANAGEMENT: PLANNING, EXECUTION,
EVALUATION AND CONTROL
Prof. Sanjib Chowdhury

EL
Vinod Gupta School of Management

PT
IIT Kharagpur

N
Module 05. Estimating Project Time and Cost
Lecture 11: Level of Detail, Type of Costs, and Refining Estimates
Concepts Covered:
• Factors influencing the quality of estimates
• Estimating guidelines for time, cost and resource
• Top-down versus bottom-up estimation

EL
• Methods for estimating project time and cost
• Level of detail

PT
• Types of costs

N
• Refining estimates

Project Management
 Bottom-up Approach for Estimating Project Time and Cost

• Template methods
• Parametric procedures
• Range estimates

EL
• Phase estimating

PT
N
Phase estimating over Product Life Cycle

EL
PT
Source: Project Management, Gray and Larson
N
Top-down and Bottom-up Estimates

EL
PT
N
Level of Details
• What should be the level of details?
– levels of management, project complexities

• Excessive detail

EL
– Costly, focus on dept., unproductive

PT
• Insufficient detail

N
– Costly, lacks focus, efforts on non-essential activities
Types of Cost
• Direct Costs
• Direct (Project) Overhead Costs
• General and Administrative Overhead Costs

Contract Bid Summary Costs Illustrative

EL
Direct costs $120,000

PT
Direct overhead $30,000

N
Total direct costs $150,000
G&A overhead (20%) $30,000
Total costs $180,000
Profit (15%) $27,000
Total bid $207,000
Refining Estimates
• Need for refining/adjusting estimates
• Hidden interaction costs
• Normal conditions
• Things that may go wrong
• Changes in project scope and plans

EL
• Optimistic

PT
• Strategic misrepresentation

N
• Create a Database for Estimation
Structure of a Database for Estimating Illustrative

EL
PT
N
Source: Project Management, Gray and Larson
Problem Solving

EL
PT
N
Problem Solving

EL
PT
N
N
PT
EL
Conclusion:
• In continuation with the previous lecture, this session discusses the Bottom-up
approach/estimation of time, cost and resources. It further elaborates why estimating
time and cost are important?
• It also explains the level of details - that shall be different for different levels of
management; excessive details increases unproductive paper work, and less details

EL
tend to loss focus and opportunities.

PT
• This module further illustrates that there are three types of cost associated with the
project and these are: (a) Direct costs, (b) Direct (project) overhead costs, and (c)

N
General and administrative overhead costs.
• It also elaborates the need for refining/adjusting estimates as there are hidden
interaction cost and other costs; and importance of creating a database for estimation.
References:
1. Project Management – The Managerial Process, Gray, C.F., Larson, E.W., and
Joshi, R., McGraw Hill Education, 8th edition.
2. Project Management – Achieving Competitive Advantage, Jeffrey K. Pinto, Pearson
Publishing Ltd., 5th edition.

EL
3. Project Management: A Managerial Approach, Meredith, J.R. and Mantel, S.J.,
Wiley, PMBOK Guidelines Book

PT
4. Project Management for Business and Technology – Principles and Practice, John

N
M. Nicholas, Prentice-Hall of India Ltd.
N
PT
EL
PROJECT MANAGEMENT: PLANNING, EXECUTION,
EVALUATION AND CONTROL
Prof. Sanjib Chowdhury

EL
Vinod Gupta School of Management

PT
IIT Kharagpur

N
Module 06: Developing Project Plan
Lecture 12: Concept of Project Network and Network Development Rules
Concepts Covered:
• Developing Project Network
• Constructing a Project Network
• Activity-on-Node (AON), Activity-on-Arrow (AOA)
• Network Computation Process

EL
• Forward Pass and Backward Pass Computation

PT
• Level of Details for Activities
• Extended Network Techniques

N
• Concepts of Lags, Laddering, Hammock Activities
• Uncertainty in activities - three time estimates
• Probability of Completion of Project on Time
Developing a Project Plan using Network model

• What is a Network?

EL
PT
• Types of network and their characteristics

N
- AON, AOA
Terminology

EL
Fig. AOA network Rules

PT
N
Fig. AON network
Developing a Project Plan using PERT/CPM
 Critical Path Method (CPM)
• DuPont (1956/57)
• Deterministic time
• AON network
• Repetitive jobs

EL
PT
 Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT)
• U S Navy (1957/58)

N
• Probabilistic time
• AOA network
• Non-repetitive jobs
Constructing Project Network
 Terminology
 Activity, Event
 Merge activity
 Parallel (concurrent) activities

EL
B
 Burst activity

PT
A C
 Dummy activity

N
D
 Two approaches
A
 Critical path, Critical activities
B D
 Slack/float

C
• Basic rules to Develop Project Networks
- Network flow
- Finish-start
- Arrows
- Identification No.

EL
- Looping

PT
- Conditional statement

N
- Dangler
Conclusion:
• This chapter explains how to develop a project plan using network model. There are
two types of network viz. Activity-on-node (used by CPM), and activity-on-arrow (used
by PERT). The differences between AON and AOA network, and their applicability
have been mentioned.

EL
• It also elucidates the difference between CPM and PERT. CPM uses one time
estimate as the tasks are repetitive and activity time is fairly accurate, whereas PERT

PT
uses probabilistic or three time estimates, which will be discussed later in this module.

N
• The module further explains various terminology used for developing network plan,
and basic rules to develop project networks.
References:
1. Project Management – The Managerial Process, Gray, C.F., Larson, E.W., and
Joshi, R., McGraw Hill Education, 8th edition.
2. Project Management – Achieving Competitive Advantage, Jeffrey K. Pinto, Pearson
Publishing Ltd., 5th edition.

EL
3. Project Management: A Managerial Approach, Meredith, J.R. and Mantel, S.J.,
Wiley, PMBOK Guidelines Book

PT
4. Project Management, Pradeep Pai, Pearson India Education Services Pvt Ltd.,

N
2019, 1st edition.
N
PT
EL
PROJECT MANAGEMENT: PLANNING, EXECUTION,
EVALUATION AND CONTROL
Prof. Sanjib Chowdhury

EL
Vinod Gupta School of Management

PT
IIT Kharagpur

N
Module 06: Developing Project Plan
Lecture 13: Construction of Network and Network Computation Process
Concepts Covered:
• Developing Project Network
• Constructing a Project Network
• Activity-on-Node (AON), Activity-on-Arrow (AOA)
• Network Computation Process

EL
• Forward Pass and Backward Pass Computation

PT
• Level of Details for Activities
• Extended Network Techniques

N
• Concepts of Lags, Laddering, Hammock Activities
• Uncertainty in activities - three time estimates
• Probability of Completion of Project on Time
• Practical considerations for building a project network

- Network Logic Errors


- Activity Numbering
- Use of Computers to Develop Networks
- Calendar Dates

EL
- Multiple Starts and Multiple Projects

PT
N
Network Logic Errors - Illogical Loop
• Steps for Developing Network analysis model – using PERT/CPM

- Identify tasks

- Define relationship

- Estimate time

- Assign resources

EL
- Draw network and compute CP

PT
N
Notations
Source: Optimization and Business Improvement Studies in Upstream Oil and Gas Industry,
Sanjib Chowdhury, Wiley & Sons Inc., NJ, USA.

N
PT
EL
Illustrative
Optimizing Rig Move Time and Activity Schedule using Critical Path Analysis Critical Path :
Rigging down
Source: Optimization and Business Improvement Studies in Upstream Oil and Gas Industry,

Practical
consideration

Illustrative

EL
PT
Steps
Sanjib Chowdhury, Wiley & Sons, NJ, USA.

N
Notation for Critical Path Analysis

Item Symbol Definition

Activity duration t The expected duration of an activity

Early start ES The earliest time an activity can begin if all previous
activities are begun at their earliest times

EL
Early finish EF The earliest time an activity can be completed if it
is started at its early start time

PT
Late start LS The latest time an activity can begin without

N
delaying the completion of the project

Late finish LF The latest time an activity can be completed if it


is started at its latest start time

Total slack TS The amount of time an activity can be delayed


without delaying the completion of the project
• Forward Pass Computation
- ES = EFpredecessor (max)
- EF = ES + t  next activity ES  unless merge activity (select largest EF of
preceding activities)

• Backward Pass Computation

EL
- LF = LSsuccessor (min)
- LS = LF - t  next activity LF  unless burst activity (select smallest LF of

PT
preceding activities)

N
- TS = LF - EF or
- TS = LS - ES

Problem Solving
Problem Solving
Questions

EL
PT
N
N
PT
EL
Problem Solving
Questions

EL
PT
N
N
PT
EL
Conclusion:
• In continuation with the last class, this lecture illustrates how to construct a project
network, and computation of network process.
• This includes computations of forward pass and backward pass, determining
float/slack, computing critical path, and sensitivity of network.

EL
• All these have been demonstrated by solving numerical, which will be helpful to the
students.

PT
N
References:
1. Project Management – The Managerial Process, Gray, C.F., Larson, E.W., and
Joshi, R., McGraw Hill Education, 8th edition.
2. Project Management – Achieving Competitive Advantage, Jeffrey K. Pinto, Pearson
Publishing Ltd., 5th edition.

EL
3. Project Management: A Managerial Approach, Meredith, J.R. and Mantel, S.J.,
Wiley, PMBOK Guidelines Book

PT
4. Project Management, Pradeep Pai, Pearson India Education Services Pvt Ltd.,

N
2019, 1st edition.
N
PT
EL

You might also like