D01.

Platform supervisor room Recommendation:

PO RO
• Platform supervisor room to be
deleted in PO as it is not provided in
RO stations and also there is no
PLATFORM function or usage of this space.

2 no’s of platform supervisor room Platform supervisor rooms not

with toilet is provided at platform provided in RO packages
level for supervison of passenger
movement at the platform
Platform supervisor room – as per ER: ER 21.3.1

The Employer’s Requirements mentions Platform Supervisor

Space/Room in the following:
ER 21.4.10
• Clause 21.3 Definition: Platform Supervisor Space
• Clause 21.4.10 Waterproofing External and Internal
• Table 21.4 Floor Area Requirements
This requirement is defined in the ER as “a space for
supervisors of passenger movement at the platform”.
CP 101 : Platform supervisor room location

1 2

QHS platform (supervisor room - 21 sqm each)

1 2

TSS platform (supervisor room - 15 sqm each)

NAS platform (supervisor room 1- 24 & supervisor room 2 -35 sqm)

Why Platform supervisor room not required
1. Just for information, the GC had obtained data from the existing local LRT/MRT lines. Platform Supervisor
Space/Rooms are not provided but instead Platform Train Dispatcher’s Booths are installed as additional
operational requirement. These booths are provided only at the terminal (end) stations.

2. NOT provided in the current design of the RO stations.

3. There is no CP106 equipment to be installed in this room.

4. Platform supervision will be done through CCTV installation at platform area, observed through proper design
of CCTV system
D02. Toilet standardisation Recommendation:
PO
• Child urinal to be removed in PO as
the large cubicle can be used a adult
As per ER 21.4.6.3,
with infant toilet
child urinal , diaper • Child diaper table to be removed in
changing table to be PO as it is already accommodated in
provided in male & multipurpose toilet. As this also
female toilet requires wash basin adjacency for
cleaning, it is best to combine in
one place.
• DOTr to advise if above RO strategy
to be followed for PO which
requires ER amendment
RO

child urinal ,
diaper
changing table
not considered
within male or
female toilet
D03. Staff lockers – wash basin
PO (ER)
ER 21.4.3.6
Showers will be provided for each sex with a
wash hand basin recess;
Wash basin inside shower areas
Clarification:
RO
• If RO has changed the design based
on new policy, should PO also
implement
• DOTr to advise if RO strategy to be
followed for PO which requires ER
amendment
RDT response on 25 Jan 2022:
Based on JDT design concept/thoughts) Considering
the situation of COVID-19, the wash basin was
installed in the locker room near the entry as it is
necessary to wash hands frequently. Besides, unlike
Showers Room, it is considered no problem to install
Wash Basin in non-waterproofing room.
Wash basin at lockers
D04. Platform lifts glazing intent Recommendation:
PO RO
• Spider fixing to be used for PO also,
similar to RO bid docs &
promotional video for improved
aesthetics and line wide consistency
• PO to follow RO also with regards to
architrave intent, glass panelisation,
smoke curtain integration etc. for
line wide consistency

Promotional video

Fixing – frame system (ER) Fixing – spider

 SA1 Contract – Stamped doc/drg
2100
- Frame system
- SS door with glass window (ER)
- Control panel along frame (no
additional side cladding)
- No cladding above lift door
- Smoke curtain header at ceiling void
- Glass panelisation – not detailed
PO - Technical Design Drawing
- Frame system
- SS door with glass (small) windows
- Jamb cladding (one side only) to cover
control panel
- Cladding above lift door to conceal curtain
- Smoke curtain header is within cladding
- Glass panelisation is assymetrical
RO – Common standard drawing
- Spider fixing system
- SS door with glass (large) windows
- Jamb cladding to cover control panel,
cladding both sides for symmetry
- No cladding above lift door
- Smoke curtain header at ceiling void
- Glass panelisation is symmetrical
Why RO to be followed for line wide consistency
1. Spider fixing is elegant , cost effective & line wide consistent. Spider fixing is much easier to install and requires
less labor than steel framing

2. As lift provides sense of direction, it is important to have line wide identity across MMSP. RO lift design is in line
with promotional video & PO could follow the same

Indicative price

Indicative Unit Price

PO Section Unit
[Php]

Fully Tempered Laminated Glass m2 18,849.60

Glass Fixing (Framed) m2 6,625.92

RO Section
Fully Tempered Laminated Glass m2 18,849.60
Glass Fixing (Spider) each 5,443.20
D05. FE stairs handrail
PO
Sub-standard handrail design (non continuous
lower handrail) , non compliant with FCP,
though compliant with BP 344
Discontinuous handrail
Clarification:
RO
• DOTr to confirm if sub standard
FCP & BP 344 compliant handrail handrail design by CP 101 JV can be
(continuous lower handrail) used in MMSP project
• DOTr to check if BFP will accept non
FCP compliant design
Handrail – as per BP 344:
Minimum Suggested

Handrail – as per FCP:

1. As per FCP, Section 10.2.5.4, H 4. c. Handrail to permit continuous sliding of hands on them.
2. As per FCP, Section 10.2.5.4, H 5. d. Guard details, the guard to be sub divided or filled.
• Intermediate rail, distance between rail should not exceed 255mm
• Vertical baluster space not more than 152.5mm
D06. TSO counters Clarification:
PO RO
• DOTr to instruct GC if NSCR to be
applied for line wide(PO/RO).
• Including the below point of
confirmation to follow:
 Window C/C – 2.4m
 Ramp access

POS heights : 1.1m for standard window, CP 104:

0.75m for PWD POS heights : unified height of 0.75m
Windows c/c (min) : 1.2m
CP 102/103/105 to 109:
POS heights : 1.0m for standard window
0.75m for PWD

Windows c/c (min) : 1.4m