Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Civil Law From Basics of Law
Civil Law From Basics of Law
Learning outcomes
By the end of the chapter, students are expected to:
Article 2 Law on Normative Legal Acts of the Kyrgyz Republic, 20 July 2009
114
No.241
106 BASICS OF LAW
115 https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts
CHAPTER VII. INTERNATIONAL LAW 107
Full Partial
18 years old Children 0-14 y.o. Adolescents 14-18 y.o.
Before reaching 18 y.o. General Rule (art.63.1 General Rule (art.61.1
through emancipation CC): CC):
(art.62 CC): all transactions on all transaction are
1. Marriage (17 their behalf are concluded with the
y.o. art.14 Family concluded by written permission of
Code); parents/custodian; parents/guardian;
2. Employment transactions transactions concluded
or self- concluded by without written
employment: children are void. permission are
by the decision of voidable.
the State Body Exception (art.63.2 CC) Exception (art.61.2 CC)
for the Protection Can be concluded Can be concluded
of Children if independently: independently:
both parents or a 1) small domestic 1) dispose of their earnings,
guardian give transactions; student allowance, and other
permission; by 2) transactions directed to incomes;
the court decision gratuitous receipt of 2) exercise an authorship
if there is no such benefits, not requiring right to works of science,
permission. notarial certification or literature, or arts, invention or
state registration; other results of their
3) transactions on disposal intellectual
of funds provided by the activity protected by the law;
lawful representative or 3) make deposits in credit
given, by consent of the institutions and dispose of
latter, by a third person for these under the legislation;
a certain purpose or free 4) engage in small domestic
disposal. transactions and other
transactions stipulated in
point 2, Article 63 of the Civil
Code.
Liability Liability
Parents/Custodian bear Adolescents bear
the liability unless they can responsibility individually.
prove that an obligation
was violated without their
fault.
The Civil Code (part 1) of the KR. regulates the process of liquidation.
According to article 96 of the CC, liquidation of a legal entity “entails its
termination without transfer of rights and obligations in succession to
other persons.”
A legal entity may be liquidated based on the decision of:
expiration of the term for which the legal entity was created,
Board of Directors
(art. 40-1, 40-2, 40-3 of Law117)
Optional
Can be established by the GMP
Executive Body
Can be 1 person or a Board
Fulfills daily activities
Board of Directors
(art. 40-1, 40-2, 40-3 of Law120)
Article 53 of the Law on JSC, “The Board of Directors shall carry out the
general management of the Company's activity, except for the issues
referred by this Law to the exclusive competence of the general meeting
of shareholders.”
Exclusive competence (art. 54 Law on JSC):
establishment of strategic purposes of a joint-stock company and
formation of its policy, and also control for its implementation by the
executive body;
adoption and approval of internal documents of the Company,
changes, and additions to them, except for the cases stipulated by this
Law;
deciding on large transactions;
election of an executive body and the head of it, establishment of
amounts of remuneration to be paid; deciding on the pre-scheduled
termination of powers of the executive body;
preparation of recommendations on the size of the dividend on shares
and the order of its payment;
submission of the grounded recommendations concerning
reorganization of the JSC, and also on the creation of branches and
opening of representations of the JSC;
Classification of Objects
Based on the transferability of objects in civil turnover, all objects
can be divided into the following 3 categories:
a. Objects that be freely transferred;
b. Objects that are limited in their transfer (e.g.
medications);
c. Objects that are prohibited for transfer (e.g. narcotic
substances, weapons).
Things can be classified based on various legal grounds and
regulation of their transfer in civil law depends on this classification.
1. Moveable and immoveable things are divided based on their
physical connection to the land or provisions of the law. Article 24
CC states that “Immovable things (immovable property,
immovables) shall be land plots, areas of mineral resources,
detached water objects, and all that is firmly connected with earth,
that is, objects which cannot be transferred from one place to
another without inflicting damage disproportionate to their
purpose, including forests, long-term plantations, buildings,
constructions, etc. Other property can also be identified as
immovable by the legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic.”122 Moveable
things are defined by the CC as “those things which are not
attributed to immovables, including money and securities….”123
This classification is important as the ownership right for an
immoveable thing should be registered and emerges from the
moment of such registration (for instance, ownership rights for
land plots, residential and non-residential premises should be
registered according to the Law on State Registration of Rights on
Immoveable Property and Related Transactions124).
2. Main thing and its fixture are differentiated as it is assumed
that a fixture follows the main thing. For instance, a painting
(main things) and its frame (fixture) are sold together, if the
painting is sold, its frame is supposed to be sold as well.
3. Divisible and indivisible things are classified based on the
possibility of their physical division without changing their
purpose. For instance, the land is divisible as it can be divided
between several owners, whereas a cup is indivisible as it cannot
be used for its purpose after division.
The seizure of property against the will of the owner is allowed only by a
court decision.
Compulsory seizure of property without a court decision is permitted in
cases provided for by law to protect national security, public order, public
health and morals, and the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
The legality of such withdrawal is subject to mandatory review by the
court.
The seizure of property for public needs, as defined in the law, may be
affected by a court decision with fair and prior security for the
reimbursement of the value of this property and other losses caused
because of alienation.
3. The conversion into state ownership of property owned by citizens and
legal entities (nationalization) is carried out based on the law with
reimbursement of the value of this property and other losses.
4. The Kyrgyz Republic protects the property of its citizens and legal
entities, as well as its property located in the territory of other states.
5. The earth, its soils, airspace, waters, forests, flora, and fauna, other
natural resources are the exclusive property of the Kyrgyz Republic, are
used to preserve a unified ecological system as the basis for the life and
work of the people of Kyrgyzstan and are under the special protection of
the state.
The land can also be in private, municipal and other forms of property
ownership, except for pastures that cannot be privately owned.
6. The limits and procedure for the exercise by the owners of their rights
and guarantees for their protection are determined by law.
From the article above, we can highlight the forms of ownership
as private property ownership and state property ownership.
These two forms of property differ in relation as to who has the attribution
of belonging of a thing, would it be individuals, legal entities or state and
municipality.128
The Constitution Art.12 (2) says that “the property is inviolable.
No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.” The following excerpt
from the decision of the Constitutional Chamber of the Kyrgyz Republic
emphasizes that it is the owner of the property has a right to terminate her
right of ownership:
5. The owner shall bear the burden of maintaining the property belonging
to him unless otherwise provided by law or the contract, and cannot
unilaterally transfer such a burden to a third party.
6. The owner bears the risk of accidental loss or accidental damage to
property unless otherwise provided by law or contract.
One of the abilities of the owner to transfer her rights being still
the owner (for example, lease agreement – based on the lease the owner
provides a property to another person for temporary use).
Acquisition (emergence) of ownership right
There are two ways of ownership right acquisition, e.g. how a
person is to get ownership right over something, and these ways are
primary (not dependent on the previous owner) and derivative (the
ownership right occurs based on the will of the previous owner (most
commonly based on the contract)131.
Primary
Newly created property
[e.g. you baked a cake, where you will have an ownership right for the
cake]
see Art. 251(2) of the CC KR
Things, products or income received as a result of using the property
[e.g you borrowed a cow from your neighbor, and you take the milk that
the cow produces]
see Art.29 of the CC KR
Property created as a result of the processing of existing materials
See Art.253 of the CC KR
Things that are generally accessible for collection
[e.g. berries, fish]
see Art. 254 of the CC KR
Property that is not owned by anyone, or the owner is unknown, or an
entity given up an ownership
131 Suhanov, Grazhdanskoe Pravo. Tom 1 [Civil Law. Vol 1]. p.493
CHAPTER VII. INTERNATIONAL LAW 133
[e.g. this may include cases when the dogs or houses are being
abandoned]
see Art.257-264
- Stray animals
- Treasure
- Lost property
Derivative
Based on the agreement
[e.g. sale contract, exchange contract, gift contract, or any contract as a
result of which the property is transferred from one to another entity]
Inherited property
Nationalization or Privatization
see Art.288 of the CC KR
Confiscation
see Art.287
132 Suhanov, Rossiiskoe Grazhdanskoe Pravo. T.1 [Russian Civil Law. Vol.1].
134 BASICS OF LAW
“117. The Tribunal has found that in 1999 the Claimant became the sole
owner of the hotel, and that the Claimant's ownership rights in the hotel
were abrogated by the decision of the Leninskiy District Court of the City
of Bishkek dated June 27, 2005, which was upheld by the decision of the
Bishkek City Court dated August 30, 2005 and the decision of the Kyrgyz
Supreme Court dated November 2, 2005, invalidating the July 1999 Share
Purchase Agreement. The effect of those decisions was supported by the
decision of the Bishkek Interdistrict Court dated June 17, 2005, annulling
the bankruptcy of Ak-Keme.
Republic.pdf
136 BASICS OF LAW
118. That abrogation was effected by an organ of the Kyrgyz State, for
which the Kyrgyz Republic is responsible. It is well established that the
abrogation of contractual rights by a State, in the circumstances that
obtained in this case, is tantamount to an expropriation of property by that
State. The Court decision deprived the Claimant of its property rights in
the hotel just as surely as if the State had expropriated it by decree. If the
Claimant has been deprived of its property rights by an act of the State, it
is irrelevant whether the state itself took possession of those rights or
otherwise benefitted from the taking.
119. That abrogation of the Claimant's property rights amounts to a breach
of the Article III of the Turkey-Kyrgyz BIT, which forbids the
expropriation of property unless it is done for a public purpose, in a non-
discriminatory manner, and upon payment of prompt, adequate and
effective compensation. Those conditions are not satisfied in this case: in
particular, no compensation has been paid. The Respondent is accordingly
obliged to make reparation for that breach of the BIT. […]
121. The Claimant was deprived of all of its rights in the hotel, and the
appropriate form of reparation is compensation for the value of the hotel.
Article III (2) of the Turkey-Kyrgyz BIT stipulates that in cases of
expropriation compensation "shall be equivalent to the real value of the
expropriated investment before the expropriatory action was taken or
became known.
122. The history of the investment in the Kyrgyz courts is convoluted. Two
things are, however, clear beyond doubt. First, the Claimant operated the
hotel and was treated by the Kyrgyz authorities as owner of the hotel from
1999 to March 2005 — and indeed, for some time afterwards, when the
Kyrgyz authorities appeared disposed to take steps to restore control of
the hotel to Sistem. Second, in March 2005, the Claimant lost control of
the hotel as a matter of fact and, by virtue of the decision of the Kyrgyz
court on June 27, 2005, the Claimant was deprived of all of the rights in
the hotel which it had obtained under the 1999 Agreements.”
Seizure of the lands:
In the Kyrgyz Republic, one of the other challenges that could be
observed is a seizure of lands by individuals, who then may claim their
legalization and ownership rights. For more, you may read Craig Hatcher,
Illegal geographies of the state: the legalization of a “squatter” settlement
in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, International Journal of Law in the Built
CHAPTER VII. INTERNATIONAL LAW 137
Intellectual Property
Related to
Industrial Property Copyright
copyright
https://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/
138 BASICS OF LAW
Thus, the obligation can emerge from the contract. A contract may
be concluded between two persons or more persons, who are often
referred to as “party” or “parties” or the “sides” of the contract. For
example, Nurbek (party/side 1) agreed to sell his cell phone to Bektur
(party/side 2), together referred to as “parties” or “sides". If they have such
type of contract (which is possible under the laws of the Kyrgyz Republic),
the law refers to them as “debtor” and “creditor”, where “debtor has to do
something for creditor as transfer property, render service, pay money
or refrain from doing something, and creditor have a right to require the
debtor to fulfill her obligations.”141 Following the illustration, Nurbek will
be creditor as he can claim money and Bektur is debtor as he is to give
money, but also Nurbek is debtor as he is to give the cell phone, and Bektur
is creditor as he is to claim this cell phone from Nurbek.
Republic] Art.296.
CHAPTER VII. INTERNATIONAL LAW 141
Republic] Art.175.
CHAPTER VII. INTERNATIONAL LAW 143
offer of the initial party. For the formation of the agreement, we need offer
and acceptance.
2. The court may amend or annul the contract at the demand of any party
only:
1) in the event of a material violation of the contract by the other party;
2) in other cases provided by this Code, by other legislation or by the
contract.
A violation shall be deemed material when the breach of the contract by
any party results in such damages for the other party, where she
considerably loses what she anticipated to get when entering into the
contract.[…]
Article 412. Amendment and Annulment of Contract in
Connection with Material Change in Circumstances
1. A material change in circumstances, upon which the parties relied in
entering a contract, shall be the grounds for amendment or annulment of
the contract unless otherwise provided by the contract or arising from the
essence of the same.
Change in circumstances shall be deemed material, where the
circumstances change so greatly that the parties would not have entered
into the contract, or have entered into the same on considerably different
conditions, had the reasonably foreseen such circumstances.
2. If the parties fail to reach an agreement to make the contract consistent
with the materially changed circumstances or to annul the same, the
contract may be annulled, and on the grounds provided in point 4 of this
Article it may be amended at the demand of the interested party where all
of the following conditions are present:
1) change in circumstances resulted from reasons which the interested
party could not overcome with the good faith and prudence required by
the nature of the contract and the conditions of activity;
2) performance of the contract, without amending its conditions, would
violate the existing balance of property interests of the parties and would
result in such damages for the interested party, that it would considerably
lose what it anticipated to get when entering into the contract;
3) business customs or the essence of the contract does not indicate that
the interested party shall bear the risk of the change in circumstances.
3. When a contract is annulled because of materially changed
circumstances, at the request of any party the court shall define the
consequences of annulling the contract, with consideration given to the
necessity of fair allocation of expenses between the parties, which
expenses were suffered in connection with the performance of the
contract.
148 BASICS OF LAW
Torts (Delicts)
Non-contractual obligations (which are also referred to as Torts
(Delicts) arise out of the circumstances provided in the legislation, and
some of the types of non-contractual obligations in the Kyrgyz Republic
are obligations arising from the causing of harm or unjust enrichment.
In the Kyrgyz Republic obligations arising from the causing of
harm addressing four main issues:
- general principles of liability (Arts.993- 1011);
- compensation for harm caused to the life or health of a citizen
(Arts.1012-1022);
CHAPTER VII. INTERNATIONAL LAW 149
144 E.A. Suhanov, ed., Grazhdanskoe Pravo. Tom 2, Polutom 2 [Civil Law. Vol.2.
Sub-Vol.2], 2002.p.367.
145 Grazhdanskii Kodeks Kyrgyzskoi Respubliki [Civil Code of the Kyrgyz
Republic] Art.1011.
CHAPTER VII. INTERNATIONAL LAW 151
performer of work (service), if they prove that the harm was caused by the
force majeure or resulted from the consumer's violation of the
instructions of use or storage of the goods, results of work or
services.151
Damage inflicted as a result of defective goods (work, service)
must be compensated if it ensued within the warranty period of goods
(work, service) established in accordance with law and if the warranty
period is not specified, within ten year period as of the date of
manufacturing (performance) of the goods (work, service) (art. 1025).
Compensation for Moral Harm
Compensation is paid in cases of non-material injuries such as
psychological damage, emotional distress, or injury to the honor or good
name of a person. If a citizen incurs moral harm (physical or moral
suffering) by actions that infringe the citizen's intangible benefits or
violating his non-property rights, as well as in other cases provided by law,
the court may impose an obligation of monetary or other material
compensation for the harm on the person responsible for the violation
(art.16).
Moral harm is generally compensated only if the wrongdoer is
guilty (art. 1027(1)). However, moral harm can also be compensated
regardless of the guilt of the injurer in the following cases:
- harm is inflicted to the life or the health of the individual by the
source of increased danger;
- harm is inflicted to the individual in the result of an illegal
conviction, illegal holding him criminally liable, illegal
imprisonment or recognizance not to leave as the measures to
secure the appearance of the defendant, illegal imposing of
administrative sanction in the form of arrest or correctional labor;
- harm is inflicted by the dissemination of data that defamed dignity
and business reputation.
Family law
Family law regulates a certain type of public relations, family
relationships arising from marriage, blood relationship, adoption of
children for upbringing to the family.
The family is a collective, united by the most diverse bonds,
where people who are united not only by emotional relationships but also
by mutual rights, obligations stipulated by the norms of law, that form a
separate sphere of legislation - family legislation152.
The subject of regulation of family law are social relations
arising from marriage, blood relationship, adoption of children for
upbringing to the family, where the legislation, in particular, in the Kyrgyz
Republic Family Code:
• establishes conditions and procedure for marriage, termination of
marriage, and invalidation of marriage;
• regulates personal non-property and property relations between
family members: spouses, parents, and children (adoptive parents
and adopted children), and in cases and within the limits provided
by family law, between other relatives and other persons.
Principles of family law.
1. Recognition of marriage entered into only in the registry
office;
2. Voluntariness of marriage union of a man and a woman;
3. Equality of spouses in the family;
4. The resolution of family issues by mutual agreement;
152 A.M. Nechaeva, Family Law. Course of Lectures (Moscow: Yurist, 2000). p .8.