Professional Documents
Culture Documents
New Frontiers in Obesity Treatment - GLP-1 and Nascent Nutrient-Stimulated Hormone-Based Therapeutics
New Frontiers in Obesity Treatment - GLP-1 and Nascent Nutrient-Stimulated Hormone-Based Therapeutics
125
INTRODUCTION
A new generation of highly effective, hormone-based pharmacotherapeutics for obesity is on the
horizon. This is driven, in part, by the understanding of obesity as a disease (1) of energy regula-
tion with complex underlying pathophysiology whereby the energy homeostasis system defends
an elevated fat mass set point (2). In particular, investigation of the role of hormones in regulation
of metabolism and appetitive behavior, and their biological effect on neural energy regulation,
have shifted the obesity therapeutic landscape to target underlying mechanisms with the devel-
opment of hormone-based medications. Among the array of nutrient-stimulated pancreatic and
intestinal hormones that provide appetitive signals is glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Originally
developed as therapeutics for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) based on their incretin ef-
fect, GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are emerging as highly effective obesity therapeutics.
GLP-1 RAs can be deployed as monotherapy, combined with other hormone-based medications,
or engineered as a dual or triple receptor agonist. This article reviews current knowledge regard-
Access provided by 189.163.72.104 on 08/14/23. See copyright for approved use.
ing the biology and pharmacological application of GLP-1 RAs for the treatment of obesity and
Annu. Rev. Med. 2023.74:125-139. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org
Past Medications
Based on early investigations of rudimentary feeding behavior, a dual-center hypothesis of feed-
ing emerged, with the ventromedial hypothalamus and lateral hypothalamus categorized as
the satiety and hunger centers in the brain, respectively. The monoamine neurotransmitters
norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine were identified as circuitry mediators. Accordingly,
the initial medications synthesized for treatment of obesity were sympathomimetic adrenergic
agents, e.g., phentermine, that functioned by stimulating norepinephrine release or by block-
ing its reuptake. A fixed-dose product containing a combination of phentermine and topiramate
(a gamma-aminobutyric acid agonist) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) in 2012, and another combining naltrexone (a nonselective opioid receptor antagonist)
and bupropion (an inhibitor of dopamine and norepinephrine transporters) was approved by the
FDA in 2014. Orlistat, a gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor approved by the FDA in 1999, is the
only FDA-approved antiobesity medication that does not exert action in the brain. Excess weight
loss for these agents compared to placebo at 1 year ranges from 2.6 kg to 8.8 kg (3). In 2014, the
FDA’s approval of liraglutide 3.0 mg established a new direction for hormone-based treatment for
obesity. Liraglutide is the first GLP-1 RA that was licensed for chronic weight management.
a
Physiologic function as it related to energy regulation and obesity.
b
The focus of Table 1 is entero-endocrine and endo-pancreatic hormones as therapeutic targets for obesity. Leptin and adiponectin are not included as
they are secreted in adipose tissue.
Abbreviations: AMY, amylin; AP, area postrema; CCK, cholecystokinin; CNS, central nervous system; CTR, calcitonin receptor; FDA, US Food and Drug
Administration; GCG, glucagon; GHS, growth hormone secretagogue; GI, gastrointestinal; GIP, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide; GLP-1,
glucagon-like peptide-1; LPL, adipocyte lipoprotein lipase; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius; OXM, oxyntomodulin; RA, receptor antagonist; RAMP,
receptor activity modifying proteins; SC, subcutaneous; T2D, type 2 diabetes; VTA, ventral tegmental area.
The paracrine mechanisms responsible for appetite and weight reduction have been studied
in animals and involve multiple brain regions comprising the homeostatic and hedonic pathways
(9–11). Uptake of semaglutide, one of the two GLP-1 RAs that are currently approved for chronic
weight management, appears to access selected brain regions involved in appetite regulation by di-
rect and circumventricular routes including the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus, the nucleus
tractus solitarius of the brain stem, and projections to other appetite-modulating relay nuclei (11,
12). Appetitive brain areas such as the striatum, insula, and orbitofrontal cortex that are commonly
activated by viewing rewarding and energy-dense food pictures (13) are also significantly reduced
by GLP-1 RA (14). Subsequently, weight reduction occurs when these biological actions are trans-
lated into reduced food intake, diminished food cravings and prospective food consumption, and
increased satiety (15–17).
Pharmacological application of native GLP-1 requires modification to its structure to resist
rapid proteolytic degradation by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4), a ubiquitous enzyme that is found
in multiple organ beds. Depending on the specific GLP-1 RA, resistance to DPP-4 action has
been accomplished by amino acid substitutions at selected points in the protein structure and by
prolonging its half-life by attachment to large proteins such as albumin or immunoglobulin (18).
The most common side effects associated with the GLP-1 RA agents, to be discussed below, are
gastrointestinal, including nausea and diarrhea. These are likely caused by direct interactions with
central nervous system GLP-1 receptors, including in the area postrema, and mainly occur at ini-
tiation of treatment during dose escalation. These gastrointestinal side effects wane with time and
weight mangement.
Annu. Rev. Med. 2023.74:125-139. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org
Table 2 Results of phase III clinical obesity trials with liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide
Liraglutide 3.0 mg SC daily Semaglutide 2.4 mg SC weekly Tirzepatide
SCALE
SCALE SCALE Obesity and SCALE
SCALE Diabetes SCALE Maintenance Prediabetes TEENS STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 8
(24) (25) IBT (26) (27) (28) (29) (33) (34) (35) STEP 4 (36) (37) SURMOUNT-1
130
Sema 2.4
weekly Tirzepatide
Obesity + Weight Obesity + 12–17 years Obesity + Weight versus Lira 5 mg, 10 mg,
Obesity T2D IBT maintenance prediabetes old Obesity T2D IBT maintenance 3.0 daily 15 mg
Jastreboff
n 3,731 846 282 422 2,254 251 1,961 1,210 611 902 338 2,539
•
Mean BMI 38.3 (6.4) 37.1 (6.5) 39.3 (6.8) 38.2 (6.2) 38.8 (6.4) 35.3 (5.1) 37.9 (6.7) 35.7 (6.3) 38.0 (6.7) 38.3 (7.0) 37.5 (6.8) 38 (6.8)
(kg/m2 )a
Kushner
Mean age (y)a 45.1 (12.0) 55.0 (10.8) 45.4 (11.6) 45.9 (11.9) 47.5 (11.7) 14.6 (1.6) 46 (12.7) 55.3 (10.6) 46.2 (12.7) 46.4 (11.9) 49 (13.0) 44.9 (12.5)
Comorbid ≥1 T2D Not ≥1 ≥1 0–≥1 ≥1 T2D ≥1 ≥1 ≥1 0–≥1
conditions specified
(cardiovas-
cular and
metabolic)
Duration 56 56 56 56 160 56 68 68 68 68 68 72
(weeks)
Mean weight 8.0 versus 6.0 versus 7.5 versus 6.2 versus 0.2 6.1 versus 1.9 –2.65 versus 14.9 versus 9.6 versus 16.0 versus 17.4 versus 5.0 15.8 versus 20.9 versus 3.1
loss (%) 2.6 2.0 4.0 +2.37 2.4 3.4 5.7 6.4b
with
treatment
versus
placebo
Placebo- 5.4 4.0 3.4 6.1 4.3 5.01 12.4 6.2 10.3 12.4 9.4b 17.8d
subtracted
weight loss
(%)
Categorical 33.1 versus 25.2 versus 30.5 versus 26.1 versus 6.3 24.8 versus 9.9 26.1 versus 69.1 versus 45.6 versus 75.3 versus 79.0 versus 20.4 70.9 versus 83.5 versus 18.8d
change in 10.6 6.7 19.8 8.1c 12 8.2 27.0 25.6b
≥10%
weight loss
with
treatment
versus
placebo
a
Mean age and BMI from active group for total population.
b
Semaglutide versus liraglutide.
c
Participants achieving ≥10% reduction in BMI (rather than % weight loss).
d
Tirzepatide 15 mg weekly dose versus placebo.
Abbreviations: IBT, intensive behavioral therapy; Lira, liraglutide; SC, subcutaneous; SCALE, Satiety and Clinical Adiposity – Liraglutide Evidence; Sema, semaglutide; STEP, Semaglutide
Treatment Effect in People with Obesity; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
once weekly in 2017 and at 2.0 mg once weekly in 2022. It was subsequently approved at doses up
to 2.4 mg once weekly for chronic weight management in the setting of obesity in 2021.
The STEP (Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity) program is designed to
investigate the effect of semaglutide versus placebo on efficacy (weight reduction), safety, and tol-
erability in adults with obesity or overweight (Table 2) (32). In the first four STEP trials, ∼5,000
participants were randomly assigned to receive semaglutide 2.4 mg SC once weekly versus placebo
over 68 weeks. Participants in all treatment groups received lifestyle intervention. In STEP 1, in-
dividuals randomized to semaglutide achieved an average weight reduction of 14.9% compared
to 2.4% for placebo (treatment difference of 12.4%). Furthermore, one-third of the semaglutide
group lost ≥20% body weight versus only 1.7% achieving this target in the placebo group (33). In
the STEP 2 trial (individuals with T2D), participants randomized to semaglutide 2.4 mg, semaglu-
tide 1.0 mg, or placebo lost 9.6%, 7.0%, and 3.4% body weight, respectively (34). The STEP 3 trial
evaluated the effect of adding IBT along with an initial 8-week low-calorie diet. Estimated mean
weight change from baseline was 16% with semaglutide versus 5.7% with placebo (mean differ-
Access provided by 189.163.72.104 on 08/14/23. See copyright for approved use.
Annu. Rev. Med. 2023.74:125-139. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org
ence of 10.3%) (35). Compared to the STEP 1 trial, individuals in the STEP 3 placebo group lost
more weight with the addition of IBT; however, mean weight reduction in the semaglutide group
was only 1% greater than that observed in STEP 1. Last, in the STEP 4 trial, all participants
received semaglutide during a 20-week run-in period. Thereafter, individuals who reached the
2.4 mg dose (average weight reduction of 10.6%) were randomized to either continue semaglutide
or switch to placebo. During the subsequent 48 weeks, participants who remained on semaglutide
lost an additional 7.9% body weight whereas the placebo group gained 6.9% body weight (36).
The more recently published STEP 8 trial demonstrates the superiority of weekly semaglutide
2.4 mg versus daily liraglutide 3.0 mg (treatment difference −9.4% body weight) (37).
The first four STEP trials demonstrate the significant biological effect of a sustained-release
GLP-1 RA on subsequent weight reduction over 68 weeks. The STEP 5 trial (37a) evaluates the
effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg versus placebo over 2 years. The weight regain data seen in STEP
4 (36) and the STEP 1 extension study (38), where participants discontinue active medication,
strongly suggest that pharmacological treatment must be sustained to combat the adaptive physi-
ological forces that hinder long-term weight reduction (39). The SELECT (Semaglutide Effects
on Heart Disease and Stroke in Patients with Overweight or Obesity) trial, a randomized double-
blind study investigating whether semaglutide 2.4 mg is superior when added to standard care for
secondary prevention of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with established CVD
and overweight or obesity, is currently under way (8).
nutrient intake (44, 45). It suppresses postprandial glucagon and delays gastric emptying (46).
The first amylin analogue, pramlintide, was FDA approved in 2005 as an adjunctive therapy to
insulin for individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Amylin’s impact on appetite and food in-
take, through action in the brain (46–50), has inspired a renewal of focus on amylin analogues
as potential antiobesity medications. Amylin acts on (a) appetitive/energy-regulating neurons in
the hypothalamus impacting food intake, (b) dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area
impacting reward and motivation, and (c) chemoreceptive neurons in the area postrema/nucleus
tractus solitarius (51).
Cagrilintide, a long-acting, weekly injectable analogue of amylin, has been investigated as
monotherapy in a phase II study (52) as well as in combination with the long-acting GLP-1 RA
semaglutide in a phase Ib study (53). In the phase II trial (52), 706 individuals with obesity [average
body mass index (BMI) 37.8 kg/m2 ] were randomized and titrated to receive either five escalating
doses of weekly cagrilinitide, daily liraglutide 3.0 mg, or placebo for 26 weeks. The participants
who received the highest dose of cagrilintide (4.5 mg weekly) lost 10.6% weight versus 8.4% in
the liraglutide group and 2.8% in the placebo group (52). The phase Ib trial, which included 95
participants with obesity (average BMI 32.1 kg/m2 ), investigated the impact of combining doses
of cagrilintide with semaglutide 2.4 mg. After 20 weeks, which included a 16-week dose titration,
the group that received the combination of semaglutide 2.4 mg plus cagrilintide 2.4 mg weekly
lost 17.1% weight, whereas the group that received monotherapy with semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly
lost 9.8% weight (53). Side effects of cagrilintide include nausea, diarrhea, constipation, fatigue,
and injection-site reactions (52). The combination of cagrilintide with semaglutide (cagri-sema)
is anticipated to enter phase III trials in late 2022. Taken together, these initial trials demon-
strate the promising potential for long-acting amylin analogue monotherapy or amylin/GLP-1
RA combinations to be additional tools in the armamentarium of antiobesity medications.
pants who were randomized to the highest dose of tirzepatide (15 mg) lost 20.9% of their body
weight, whereas the placebo group lost 3.1% (treatment difference of 17.8%) (Table 2). Addition-
ally, more than half of the participants randomized to tirzepatide 10 mg or 15 mg lost ≥20% body
weight versus 3.1% achieving this target in the placebo group. SURMOUNT-2 (individuals with
T2D) (NCT04657003), SURMOUNT-3 (lifestyle weight loss program) (NCT04657016), and
SURMOUNT-4 (weight loss maintenance) (NCT04660643) are all ongoing trials with primary
completion dates in 2023. The SURMOUNT-1 trial demonstrates the impact of dual GIP/GLP-1
receptor agonism as a potential new treatment modality for obesity, demonstrating weight re-
duction that has not been previously demonstrated in phase III obesity treatment trials. Dual
GIP/GLP-1 agonism is being further investigated in the ongoing SURMOUNT Obesity trials.
Figure 1
Novel nutrient-stimulated hormone-based therapies in the pipeline for obesity treatment. In a rapidly expanding landscape of
hormone-based therapies, multiple nascent entero-endocrine and endo-pancreatic agents are in various stages of development for the
treatment of obesity. These include oral formulations of GLP-1 RAs as monotherapeutics as well as dual and triple receptor agonists.
Included in the figure are agents in development specifically for obesity treatment with the corresponding NCT numbers of phase I, II,
and III obesity trials. Abbreviations: AMY, amylin; DACRA, dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist; GCG, glucagon; GIP,
glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; LA, long acting; NCT, National Clinical Trial
identifier number; NPA, nonpeptide agonist; RA, receptor agonist; SC, subcutaneous; SCALE, Satiety and Clinical Adiposity –
Liraglutide Evidence; sm, small molecule; STEP, Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity.
in dysglycemia but also results in dysregulated (elevated) defended fat mass set point. Aiming to
restore the balance of these hormones may also help reset the defended fat mass set point by al-
tering complementary central (neural) energy-homeostasis pathways. Recently, a GIP/GLP-1/
glucagon triple analogue (LY3437943) completed phase I studies. In the phase I randomized
double-blind placebo-controlled study, 45 adult participants received a single injection of placebo
or ascending dose of LY3437943 (78). The two highest doses of LY3437943, 4.5 mg and 6 mg,
resulted in weight reduction of 2.9 kg and 3.5 kg at day 8 post dose, respectively, with weight re-
duction maintained at day 43. The most common side effects were gastrointestinal and were mild
to moderate in severity. Based on these results, currently, LY34379943 is in phase II undergoing
further clinical development.
Entero-endocrine and endo-pancreatic hormones work in concert impacting food intake,
weight regulation, and glycemic homeostasis. Combining the hormones may be an approach
that targets the many intertwined mechanisms of obesity. A multitude of novel multi-hormone
therapeutics are in the pipeline (Figure 1).
SUMMARY POINTS
1. Hormone-based pharmacotherapy that leverages entero-endocrine and endo-pancreatic
nutrient-stimulated peptides that govern the gut–brain axis presents a novel, mechanism-
based, and increasingly effective paradigm for the treatment of obesity.
2. Two monotherapy GLP-1 RAs, liraglutide and semaglutide, are currently approved for
chronic weight management, producing average placebo-subtracted weight reduction of
5.2% and 12.5%, respectively. Two oral formulations with GLP-1 RA action are under
investigation for weight management.
3. Tirzepatide, a novel single-molecule GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, demonstrated av-
erage placebo-subtracted weight reduction of 17.8% with most subjects losing ≥20%
body weight. Combinations or coformulations of nutrient-stimulated hormones such
as GLP-1, GIP, amylin, and/or glucagon as dual or triple receptor agonists target the
multifaceted pathophysiology of obesity.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
A.M.J. serves on scientific/medical advisory boards for Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Eli
Lilly, Pfizer, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, WW, and IntelliHealth; serves as a consultant for Scholar
Rock; and receives institutional research support from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Rhythm Phar-
maceuticals. R.F.K. serves on scientific advisory boards for Novo Nordisk and WW and serves as
a consultant for Altimmune, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
A.M.J. acknowledges institutional research support from the National Institutes of Health/
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK099039 and R01
DK117651).
LITERATURE CITED
1. Jastreboff AM, Kotz CM, Kahan S, et al. 2019. Obesity as a disease: the Obesity Society 2018 position
statement. Obesity 27:7–9
2. Schwartz MW, Seeley RJ, Zeltser LM, et al. 2017. Obesity pathogenesis: an Endocrine Society scientific
statement. Endocr. Rev. 38:267–96
11. Gabery S, Salinas CG, Paulsen SJ, et al. 2020. Semaglutide lowers body weight in rodents via distributed
neural pathways. JCI Insight 5:e133429
12. Secher A, Jelsing J, Baquero AF, et al. 2014. The arcuate nucleus mediates GLP-1 receptor agonist
liraglutide-dependent weight loss. J. Clin. Investig. 124:4473–88
13. Jastreboff AM, Lacadie C, Seo D, et al. 2014. Leptin is associated with exaggerated brain reward and
emotion responses to food images in adolescent obesity. Diabetes Care 37:3061–68
14. Grill HJ. 2020. A role for GLP-1 in treating hyperphagia and obesity. Endocrinology 161:bqaa093
15. Blundell J, Finlayson G, Axelsen M, et al. 2017. Effects of once-weekly semaglutide on appetite, energy
intake, control of eating, food preference and body weight in subjects with obesity. Diabetes Obes. Metab.
19:1242–51
16. Friedrichsen M, Breitschaft A, Tadayon S, et al. 2021. The effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly on
energy intake, appetite, control of eating, and gastric emptying in adults with obesity. Diabetes Obes. Metab.
23:754–62
17. Tronieri JS, Wadden TA, Walsh O, et al. 2020. Effects of liraglutide on appetite, food preoccupation, and
food liking: results of a randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Obes. 44:353–61
18. Nauck MA, Quast DR, Meier JJ. 2021. Another milestone in the evolution of GLP-1-based diabetes
therapies. Nat. Med. 27:952–53
19. Ard J, Fitch A, Fruh S, Herman L. 2021. Weight loss and maintenance related to the mechanism of action
of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Adv. Ther. 38:2821–39
20. Almandoz JP, Lingvay I, Morales J, Campos C. 2020. Switching between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor
agonists: rationale and practical guidance. Clin. Diabetes 38:390–402
21. Gossmann M, Butsch WS, Jastreboff AM. 2021. Treating the chronic disease of obesity. Med. Clin. North
Am. 105:983–1016
22. Knudsen LB, Lau J. 2019. The discovery and development of liraglutide and semaglutide. Front.
Endocrinol. 10:155
23. Bode B. 2012. An overview of the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of liraglutide. Diabetes Res. Clin.
Pract. 97:27–42
24. Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, et al. 2015. A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in
weight management. N. Engl. J. Med. 373:11–22
25. Davies MJ, Bergenstal R, Bode B, et al. 2015. Efficacy of liraglutide for weight loss among patients with
type 2 diabetes: the SCALE Diabetes randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:687–99
26. Wadden TA, Tronieri JS, Sugimoto D, et al. 2020. Liraglutide 3.0 mg and intensive behavioral therapy
(IBT) for obesity in primary care: the SCALE IBT randomized controlled trial. Obesity 28:529–36
27. Wadden TA, Hollander P, Klein S, et al. 2013. Weight maintenance and additional weight loss with
liraglutide after low-calorie-diet-induced weight loss: the SCALE Maintenance randomized study. Int. J.
Obes. 37:1443–51
[7–36 amide] but not of synthetic human gastric inhibitory polypeptide in patients with type-2 diabetes
mellitus. J. Clin. Investig. 91:301–7
57. Piteau S, Olver A, Kim SJ, et al. 2007. Reversal of islet GIP receptor down-regulation and resistance to
GIP by reducing hyperglycemia in the Zucker rat. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 362:1007–12
58. Baggio LL, Drucker DJ. 2007. Biology of incretins: GLP-1 and GIP. Gastroenterology 132:2131–57
59. Usdin TB, Mezey E, Button DC, et al. 1993. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor, a member of the
secretin-vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor family, is widely distributed in peripheral organs and the
brain. Endocrinology 133:2861–70
60. Nyberg J, Anderson MF, Meister B, et al. 2005. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide is
expressed in adult hippocampus and induces progenitor cell proliferation. J. Neurosci. 25:1816–25
61. Adriaenssens AE, Biggs EK, Darwish T, et al. 2019. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide
receptor-expressing cells in the hypothalamus regulate food intake. Cell Metab. 30:987–96.e6
62. Coskun T, Sloop KW, Loghin C, et al. 2018. LY3298176, a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor agonist
for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: from discovery to clinical proof of concept. Mol. Metab.
18:3–14
63. Rosenstock J, Wysham C, Frias JP, et al. 2021. Efficacy and safety of a novel dual GIP and GLP-1 receptor
agonist tirzepatide in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-1): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3
trial. Lancet 398:143–55
64. Capozzi ME, DiMarchi RD, Tschop MH, et al. 2018. Targeting the incretin/glucagon system with
triagonists to treat diabetes. Endocr. Rev. 39:719–38
65. Del Prato S, Kahn SE, Pavo I, et al. 2021. Tirzepatide versus insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes and
increased cardiovascular risk (SURPASS-4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase
3 trial. Lancet 398:1811–24
66. Dahl D, Onishi Y, Norwood P, et al. 2022. Effect of subcutaneous tirzepatide versus placebo added to
titrated insulin glargine on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: the SURPASS-5 randomized
clinical trial. JAMA 327:534–45
67. Frias JP, Davies MJ, Rosenstock J, et al. 2021. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients
with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 385:503–15
68. Ludvik B, Giorgino F, Jodar E, et al. 2021. Once-weekly tirzepatide versus once-daily insulin degludec as
add-on to metformin with or without SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes (SURPASS-3):
a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3 trial. Lancet 398:583–98
69. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. 2022. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity.
N. Engl. J. Med. 387:205–16
70. Sutherland EW, Cori CF. 1948. Influence of insulin preparations on glycogenolysis in liver slices. J. Biol.
Chem. 172:737–50
71. Muller WA, Faloona GR, Aguilar-Parada E, Unger RH. 1970. Abnormal alpha-cell function in diabetes.
Response to carbohydrate and protein ingestion. N. Engl. J. Med. 283:109–15
79. Muller TD, Finan B, Bloom SR, et al. 2019. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Mol. Metab. 30:72–130
80. Bliss ES, Whiteside E. 2018. The gut-brain axis, the human gut microbiota and their integration in the
development of obesity. Front. Physiol. 9:900
81. Boyle CN, Lutz TA, Le Foll C. 2018. Amylin—its role in the homeostatic and hedonic control of eating
and recent developments of amylin analogs to treat obesity. Mol. Metab. 8:203–10
82. Lutz TA. 2022. Creating the amylin story. Appetite 172:105965
83. Christoffersen BO, Skyggebjerg RB, Bugge A, et al. 2020. Long-acting CCK analogue NN9056 lowers
food intake and body weight in obese Gottingen minipigs. Int. J. Obes. 44:447–56
84. Zigman JM, Bouret SG, Andrews ZB. 2016. Obesity impairs the action of the neuroendocrine ghrelin
system. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 27:54–63
85. Holst JJ, Rosenkilde MM. 2020. GIP as a therapeutic target in diabetes and obesity: insight from incretin
co-agonists. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 105:e2710–16
86. Holst JJ. 2019. The incretin system in healthy humans: the role of GIP and GLP-1. Metabolism 96:46–55
87. Galsgaard KD, Pedersen J, Knop FK, et al. 2019. Glucagon receptor signaling and lipid metabolism.
Front. Physiol. 10:413
88. Koska J, DelParigi A, de Courten B, et al. 2004. Pancreatic polypeptide is involved in the regulation of
body weight in Pima Indian male subjects. Diabetes 53:3091–96
Annual Review of
Medicine
v
ME74_FrontMatter ARjats.cls December 6, 2022 14:53
vi Contents
ME74_FrontMatter ARjats.cls December 6, 2022 14:53
Indexes
Errata
Contents vii